FINANCE & PERSONNEL REPORT

Transcription

1 FINANCE & PERSONNEL REPORT SUMMARY RESULTS FROM THE STATE OF THE STATES FINANCE & PERSONNEL SURVEY In 2014, directors and designated representatives of state health department injury and violence prevention (IVP) programs were asked to complete the Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013 State of the States (SOTS) Finance & Personnel Survey. The summary table below reflects the amount of funding utilized by the 40 state injury and violence prevention programs that responded to the survey. (NOTE: All funding data discussed in this issue brief is self-reported and does not reflect a financial audit of participating state injury and violence prevention programs. Funding amounts for each funding source were prorated to better represent the amount of funding received by state injury and violence prevention programs in : October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013). Table 1. Funding Utilized by State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs (of 40 Survey Respondents) Funding Source Amount Spent by the Injury and Violence Prevention Program ($) Total Min Max Avg. Amount per State ($) Percent of Total National IVP Funding (%) States Reporting Funding (N) State General Revenue 26,758,262 6,476 18,900,000 1,274, % 21 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)/ Maternal Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Title V Block Grant Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/ National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) Rape Prevention and Education 25,855,357 5,000 11,486,655 1,436, % 18 16,786,869 70,058 3,880, , % 26 Dedicated State Funding Stream 8,277,950 40,000 1,800, , % 16 CDC/NCIPC Core Violence and Injury Prevention Programs 7,942,435 49, , , % 20 (VIPP) 1 CDC Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant 7,882,874 15,039 1,942, , % 25 State Highway Safety Office 3,101,469 20,000 1,144, , % 14 CDC/NCIPC National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) 2,983, , , , % 13 U.S. Department of Justice 2,348,368 58,553 1,234, , % 4 Funding Sources 2,300,311 6, , , % 15 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) State and Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention Grants 2,231,249 50, , , % 6 State Funding Sources 1,200,964 20, , , % 10 Emergency Management Agency 1,037, , , , % 2 Funding Sources 541,452 10, ,400 77, % 7 HRSA/MCHB Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) 520, , , , % 4 SAMHSA Campus Suicide Prevention Grants 480, , , , % 1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 290, , , , % 2 Foundation 211,667 15, ,000 70, % 3 Nonprofit Organizations 203, ,176 50, % 4 Universities 193,600 34,600 70,000 48, % 4 NHTSA Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) 140,893 20,893 40,000 35, % 4 CDC/NCIPC Residential Fire-related Injury Prevention Program 108, , , , % 1 Corporate/Private 42,825 14,325 28,500 21, % 2 Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) 16, ,000 2, % 7 Grand Total $111,456,302 Lowest State Total $54,933 Average State Total $2,786,408 Highest State Total $22,798, Core VIPP includes Basic Integration Components and other expanded components (Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention, Regional Network Leaders, Falls Injury Prevention, and Surveillance Quality Improvement). Page 1

2 TYPES OF FUNDING SOURCES 2 In 2013, $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs. This is an average of $2.8 million per state program (median of $1.5 million, ranging from $54,933 to $22.8 million). Investments in state injury and violence prevention programs come from a variety of funding sources, including federal agencies, state governments, non-profit organizations, and foundations. Of the 251 awards that state injury and violence prevention programs received from 21 different funding sources, 68% were federal grants, 24% were from state sources, and 8% were from other sources in sources contributed $70.9 million (64%) of all funding through 170 funding awards to state injury and violence prevention programs nationwide (Figure 1). State funds contributed $39.3 million (35%) and other sources of funding (i.e., universities, private/corporate, non-profits, etc.) contributed $1.2 million (1%). A greater number of awards came from federal sources than from state and other sources combined. Figure 1. Funding Source Types Awarded to State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, 2013 $1.2M 1% 20 8% State $39.3M 35% State 61 24% $70.9M 64% % While all states that were surveyed reported receiving federal funding, four (10%) of states reported receiving funding from federal sources only (Figure 2) and another four (10%) of states reported not receiving any federal funding. The majority of states (N=32, 78%) received funding from federal and state sources only. Only 10 states (25%) reported receiving funding from federal, state, and other sources. Figure 2. Funding Source Types Awarded to State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, and State, State, and 4 (10%) states did not receive federal sources 4 (10%) states received federal sources only 32 (78%) states received federal and state sources 4 (10%) states received state sources only 25 (63%) states received federal and state sources only 10 (25%) states received federal, state, and other sources 2. All funding data discussed in this issue brief is self-reported and does not reflect a financial audit of participating state injury and violence prevention programs. Funding amounts for each funding source were prorated to better represent the amount of funding received by state injury and violence prevention programs in : October 1, 2012 September 30, 2013 Page 2

3 State injury and violence prevention programs received funding from a median of five total funding sources (ranging from one to 14 funding sources). They received funding from a median of four federal sources (ranging from one to 10 sources), two state sources (ranging one to three sources), and two other sources (ranging from one to three sources). STATE & NATIONAL PER CAPITA COMPARISONS In a single year, injuries and violence will ultimately cost the United States $406 billion, which includes over $80 billion in medical costs and $326 billion in lost productivity. 3 This is an annual cost of nearly $1,303 for every individual living in the U.S. In contrast, only about $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs in This amount resulted in a national average investment of only $0.45 per person in the United States. While five state injury and violence prevention programs were funded at amounts close to or equal to the national average of $0.45 per person, 21 state programs were funded at less than the national average (Figure 3). Five state programs received between $0.16 and $0.30 per person, while eleven state programs received funding that equated to less than $0.15 per person. At the other end of the spectrum, several state programs received funding amounts equal to or greater than the national average. Thirteen state programs received between $0.45 and $1.00 per person, while another four state programs received and invested more than $1.00 per person to support injury and violence prevention efforts. Figure 3. State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention 2013 Funding per Capita: State Funding per Capita Compared to National Funding per Capita ($0.45 per capita) State IVP Funding per Capita Less than $0.15 per person $ $0.30 per person $ $0.44 per person $ $1.00 per person More than $1.00 per person No data available 3. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; Page 3

4 ALLOCATION OF FUNDING AND PROGRAMMATIC TOPIC AREAS SUPPORTED In 2013, the majority of state injury and violence prevention program funding ($60.6 million, 54%) was allocated to grants, minigrants, and contracts that supported programmatic efforts (Figure 4). The next highest allocation of funding ($29.0 million, 26%) went to support personnel. Overhead expenses, safety equipment, and other spending categories made up the remaining 20% of all expenses incurred by state injury and violence prevention programs in Figure 4. Allocation of State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention Funding Nationwide, 2013 $60.6 M $29.0 M $9.2 M In Fiscal Year 2013, $111.4 million was invested nationally in state public health injury and violence prevention programs $5.2 M $4.0 M $3.4 M Grants/Mini-Grants/ Contracts Personnel (Salary & Fringe) Safety Equipment Contractor/Consultant (Company or Individual) Overhead Expenses (Indirect Costs) States were asked to list the injury and violence topic areas addressed by each funding source. Almost all funding sources were used to address multiple topics. The five most common injury and violence-related topics that were supported by all funding sources were: 1. Motor vehicle injury prevention 2. Fall injury prevention 3. Sexual assault/rape prevention 4. Suicide/self-inflicted injury prevention 5. Poisoning/prescription drug overdose prevention As shown in Table 2, state injury and violence prevention programs used a variety of funding sources to address the five most common injury and violence topic areas in Eighteen (18) sources and 80 awards were used to address motor vehicle injury prevention efforts nationally. The most commonly reported funding sources used to support motor vehicle injury prevention were CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, State Highway Safety Office, State General Revenue, and HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant. Fall injury prevention efforts were supported by a total of 13 funding sources and 56 awards nationwide. The most commonly reported funding sources for fall injury prevention were CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, the CDC Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant, and the HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant. Sexual assault/rape prevention efforts were supported by a total of 12 funding sources and 55 awards nationwide. The most commonly reported funding sources for sexual assault/rape prevention were CDC/NCIPC Rape Prevention and Education, CDC PHHS Block Grant, and State General Revenue. Table 2. Five Most Common Injury and Violence Topic Areas and Supporting Funding Sources, 2013 Rank IVP Topic Area No. of Funding Sources (No. of Awards) 1 Motor vehicle injury prevention 18 (80) 2 Fall injury prevention 13 (56) 3 Sexual assault/rape prevention 12 (55) Most Commonly Reported Funding Sources State Used to Support IVP Topic Area CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP; State Highway Safety Office; State General Revenue; HRSA/ MCHB Title V Block Grant; CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP; CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue; HRSA/ MCHB Title V Block Grant CDC/NCIPC Rape Prevention and Education (RPE); CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue 4 Suicide/self-inflicted injury prevention 17 (55) CDC/NCIPC NVDRS; State General Revenue; HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant 5 Poisoning/prescription drug overdose prevention 13 (51) Core VIPP; CDC PHHS Block Grant; State General Revenue; HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant 4. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; Page 4

5 INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES AND FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE) A total of $60.6 million from 21 different funding sources supported 431 individual employees working in state health department injury and violence prevention programs. Of these individuals, 341 (79%) were full-time or part-time paid staff, 49 (11%) were full-time or part-time contractors, and the remaining 41 (10%) worked in other capacities. Staff time that is dedicated to state injury and violence prevention programs is measured in terms of full-time equivalents (FTEs). 5 The 431 individual employees working in state injury and violence prevention programs in 2013 equated to a total of FTEs. State programs had a median of 7.50 FTEs and an average of 8.54 FTEs, with values ranging from 0.55 to FTEs. A quarter of states had less than 3.00 FTEs in their injury and violence prevention program, 50% had between 3.50 and FTEs, and the remaining 25% had more than FTEs. FTEs contributed to injury and violence prevention efforts through a variety of primary roles, including intervention/program coordination (32%), data collection and analysis (15%), and management (13%) (Figure 5). The majority of states did not have any FTEs with primary roles in public policy (75%), evaluation (63%), or technical assistance and training (55%). Only three states had staff with time dedicated to all of the nine primary staff roles depicted in Figure 5. Figure 5. Distribution of FTE Primary Staff Roles from All Funding Sources, % 15% 13% 11% 9% Intervention & Program Coordination Data Analysis & Collection Management Support Staff/Administrative Coalition Building & Coordination 9% 6% 2% 2% 1% Evaluation Technical Assistance & Training Public Policy & Advocacy Communications Full-Time Equivalents Worked within State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs in Fiscal Year Full-time equivalents (FTEs): the total number of hours worked by an individual employee divided by the total number of work hours in a full-time schedule (defined as 40 hours per week). Page 5

6 TOP FUNDING SOURCES Of the 21 funding sources included in the 2013 State of the States (SOTS) Finance and Personnel Survey, six sources accounted for 84% ($93.5 million) of the total amount of funding utilized by state injury and violence prevention programs in These sources included State General Revenue, HRSA/MCHB Title V Block, CDC/NCIPC RPE, Dedicated State Funding Stream, CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP, and CDC PHHS Block Grant (Figure 6). Of these six top funding sources, four were federal sources and two were state sources. State General Revenue contributed the most dollars to state injury and violence prevention programs. In 2013, 21 states received a combined total of $26.8 million (24% of state program funding nationally) from State General Revenue. In contrast, the CDC PHHS Block Grant provided less total funding to state injury and violence prevention programs ($7.9 million or 7% of state program funding nationally), but provided funding to more states (N=25). Additionally, although fewer states received Dedicated State Funding Stream dollars, this funding source contributed slightly more funding to state injury and violence prevention programs than CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP or the CDC PHHS Block Grant. Figure 6. Number of States that Reported Receiving the Funding Sources vs. Total Provided by Each Funding Source, Funding Source Type: State Top Funding Sources State General Revenue HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant Total Provided by Each Funding Source ($) Millions Dedicated State Funding Stream CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP CDC/NCIPC RPE CDC PHHS Block Grant P Q A G L M R C H D O B E F I, J L L N 0 K Number of State IVPs that Reported Receiving the Funding Source A. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Campus Suicide Prevention Grants B. CDC/NCIPC Residential Fire-related Injury Prevention Program C. Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) D. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) E. Corporate/Private F. Foundation G. U.S. Department of Justice H. HRSA/MCHB Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) I. NHTSA Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) J. Nonprofit Organizations K. Universities L. SAMHSA State and Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention Grants M. Funding Sources N. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) O. State Funding Sources P. CDC/NCIPC National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) Q. State Highway Safety Office R. Funding Sources Page 6

7 The six top sources supported FTEs, or 70% of all staff of state health department injury and violence prevention programs (Figure 7). Although State General Revenue contributed the largest dollar amount to support FTEs, CDC/NCIPC Core VIPP funding supported the highest number of FTEs (59.48). Figure 7. Comparison of FTEs in Top Six Funding Sources to All Sources 30% FTEs 70% FTEs 70% FTEs Remaining 15 Funding Sources FTEs Supported by Top Funding Sources: CDC/NCIPC Core FTEs State General Revenue FTEs HRSA/MCHB Title V Block Grant FTEs CDC/NCIPC RPE FTEs CDC PHHS Block Grant FTEs Dedicated State Funding Stream FTEs 18% 18% 11% 11% 8% 5% BUDGET CUTS Sixty percent of states (N=25) experienced budget cuts in These budget cuts impacted numerous funding sources and, in turn, adversely affected the activities and services provided by state health department injury and violence prevention programs. The most commonly reported consequences of budget cuts were reductions in support to partners (68%), services (64%), and surveillance efforts (44%), as well as the loss of staff through attrition (36%) (Figure 8). Figure 8. Anticipated Impacts of Budget Cuts, 2013 Reduction in support to partners Reduction in services Reduction in surveillance efforts Loss of staff through attrition Elimination of entire program(s) Reduction in support to local health departments Staff layoffs Staff furloughs 8% 12% 24% 24% 36% 44% 68% 64% Safe States Alliance 2200 Century Parkway, Suite 700 Atlanta, Georgia (770) (Phone) (770) (Fax) Page 7