Becoming a Conversation Ready Organization

Similar documents
Becoming a Conversation Ready Organization

Is Your Health Care System Conversation Ready?

IHI Expedition. Improving Patient Experience and Making It Stick Session 5. Expedition Coordinator

Are you Conversation Ready?

GETTING STARTED KIT. Conversation Ready Health Care Community

IHI Expedition Expedition: Making Mental Health Care Safer in the Hospital Setting Session 6: Being Proactive and Avoiding Crises

Digital Transformation of MOLST: Getting Started and Ensuring Sustainability

IHI Expedition. Improving Care for Frail Older Adults with Complex Needs Session 3

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

POLST Registry Vendor Webinar. October 8, :00 11:00am

Massachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care Committee - As of December 2016

Federal Policy Agenda / 2016 & Beyond

Advanced Illness Management Leveraging Person Centered Care and Reengineering the Care Team Across the Continuum

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

Session Three Foundational Element: Engagement

M1: Flipping Healthcare: Operationalizing What Matters Most

Outline. I. Overview of QIO Care Transitions. II. Analyses: patient trajectory III. Palliative and end-of-life care

IHI Expedition Reducing Readmissions by Improving Care Transitions Session 4

Expedition: Improving Safety and Reliability for Surgical Procedures

POLST Discussions Doing it Better. Clinical Update in Geriatric Medicine. Judith S. Black, MD, MHA. POLST Overview. Faculty Disclosure PART I

A20, B20. This presenter has nothing to disclose

Overview 6/25/2014. Advanced Directives. 2. Out of Hospital DNR/DNI 3. University i Hospital DNR/DNI implementation 4. Special circumstances

Quality of Life Conversation On Advance Care Planning

Hospital Readmissions

Virtua/CHOP Virtua and The Children s Hospital Of Philadelphia: An Example Case Study for Seamless Data Integration

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

TOOL 2-6 Sample MOLST Policy for Acute Care Hospitals 1

Care Transitions: What Does It Really Look Like?

Navigating the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

From Reactive to Proactive: Creating a Population Management Platform

CHRONIC CARE MANAGEMENT. A Guide to Medicare s New Move Toward Patient-Centric Care

Driving Advanced Care Planning

Advocate Cerner Partnership Creates Big Data Analytics for Population Health

Breaking Down Silos of Care: Integration of Social Support Services with Health Care Delivery

How ACO s Are Thinking of Home Care: the Atrius Health Experience

Reducing Hospital Admissions Through the Use of IT. Steven Milligan MD Medical Director of ACO Management Colorado Health Neighborhoods

POLST: Advance Care Planning for the Seriously Ill

Community Care Coordination Cross Continuum Care IHC Medical Home Conference September 5, 2012 Des Moines IA

Career Options in Health Care Informatics

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Using Facets of Midas+ Hospital Case Management to Support Transitions of Care. Barbara Craig, Midas+ SaaS Advisor

JULY 2012 RE-IMAGINING CARE DELIVERY: PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE HOSPITALIST MODEL IN THE INPATIENT SETTING

New Opportunities for Case Management Leadership in our Changing Environment

Developing Post- Hospital Follow-Up Care Plans and Real-time Handover Communications Peg Bradke

Outside the Box: A. Social Service Model of Community-based Palliative Care. Seniors At Home A division of Jewish Family and Children s Services

Value-Based Health Care Delivery: Reimbursement, System Integration, and Growth

Give Me My Health Records! OpenNotes: Status Update

Hospital Readmissions Survival Guide

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Models of Accountable Care

Chronic Care Management. Sharon A. Shover, CPC, CEMC 2650 Eastpoint Parkway, Suite 300 Louisville, Kentucky

Palmetto GBA Hospice Coalition Questions August 7, 2001

Data Sharing Consent/Privacy Practice Summary

Agenda. ACMA A Strong Base

Variables that impact the cost of delivering SB 1004 palliative care services. Kathleen Kerr, BA Kerr Healthcare Analytics September 28, 2017

HCFA Suggested 2014 Patient and Family Advisory Council Annual Report Template

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING: WHY, HOW, AND IMPACT ON THE TRIPLE AIM

Advanced Care Planning and Advanced Directives: Our Roles March 27, 2017

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Improving Transitions Across the Continuum of Care

Advancing Patient Engagement in Behavioral Health

Digitalization of Advance Care Planning

Database Profiles for the ACT Index Driving social change and quality improvement

Transitional Care Management Services: New Codes, New Requirements

Improving Care Coordination to Manage an ACO Population. Greater Baltimore Medical Center

Texas ACO invests in the Quanum portfolio to improve patient care

L8: Care Management for Complex Patients: Strategies, Tools and Outcomes

Clinical Integration and P4P: Using Pay for Performance to Build Clinical Integration within a Physician-Hospital IPA

IHI Expedition. Reducing Readmissions by Improving Care Transitions Session 2. Expedition Coordinator

Advance Care Planning Exploratory Project. Rhonda Wiering, MSN, RN,BC, LNHA Regional Director, Quality Initiatives Avera Health October 18, 2012

The New Right Way: Introducing New Staffing Models on Vancouver Island

Core Item: Hospital. Cover Page. Admissions and Readmissions. Executive Summary

Meaningful Use: A Brief Overview for Society of Health Systems

Pennsylvania Patient and Provider Network (P3N)

Healthcare Solutions Nuance Clintegrity Quality Management Solutions. Quality. The Discipline to Win.

Improving End-of-life Care: A Community Approach Patricia Bomba, MD, MACP VP & Medical Director, Geriatrics, Excellus BlueCross Blue Shield

2012 National Patient Safety Goals and National Priorities Partnership Goals addressed in this case study

ACO Practice Transformation Program

PRISM Collaborative: Transforming the Future of Pharmacy PeRformance Improvement for Safe Medication Management

Analytics in Action. Using Data to Improve Care and Reduce Costs CUSTOM MEDIA SPONSORED BY

Webinar Instructions. A nonprofit service and advocacy organization National Council on Aging

Overview of Presentation

Pave Your Path: How to Improve-Will, Ideas and Execution

Accountable Care Atlas

CPC+ CHANGE PACKAGE January 2017

Disclosure. Objectives. POLST Education for Healthcare Professionals Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA) E Learning

INTEGRATED DATA ANALYTICS AND CARE WORKFLOW OPTIMIZATION

Conversation Starters: Research Insights from Clinicians and Patients on Conversations About End-of-Life Care and Wishes

CMS Oncology Care Model s Standards for Patient Navigation

PFAC as Consultant to Hospital Initiatives

STAAR Initiative STate Action on Avoidable Rehospitalizations

Katherine Schneider, MD, MPhil Senior Vice President, Health Engagement July 29, 2011

Chronic Care Management

Advance Care Planning: Goals of Care - Calgary Zone

IMPACT - Connecting Nursing Facilities and Home Care to the Healthcare System of the Future

Examining the Differences Between Commercial and Medicare ACO Models

Online Data Supplement Medical Record Quality Assessments of Palliative Care for ICU Patients: Do They Match Nurses and Families Perspectives?

Best Practices for emeasure Implementation. Breakout Session #2: Implementation in Office-Based Practice Settings

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

Marc Tucker DO,FACOS,MBA Vice President-Compliance and Physician Education

Transcription:

June 20, 2017 These presenters have nothing to disclose Becoming a Conversation Ready Organization Session 3 Steward: Achieving the reliability of allergy information Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD Kelly McCutcheon Adams, MSW, LICSW

Senior Project Manager Angela G. Zambeaux, Senior Project Manager, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, has managed a wide variety of IHI projects, including a project funded by the US Department of Health and Human Services that partnered with the design and innovation consulting firm IDEO around shared decision-making and patientcentered outcomes research; the STAAR (STate Action to Reduce Avoidable Rehospitalizations) initiative; virtual programming for office practices; and in-depth quality and safety assessments for various hospitals and hospital systems. Prior to joining IHI, Ms. Zambeaux provided project management support to a small accounting firm and spent a year in France teaching English to elementary school students.

Faculty Kelly McCutcheon Adams, LICSW has been a Director at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement since 2004. Her primary areas of work with IHI have been in Critical Care and End of Life Care. She is an experienced medical social worker with experience in emergency department, ICU, nursing home, sub-acute rehabilitation, and hospice settings. Ms. McCutcheon Adams served on the faculty of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Organ Donation and Transplantation Collaboratives and serves on the faculty of the Gift of Life Institute in Philadelphia. She has a B.A. in Political Science from Wellesley College and an MSW from Boston College.

Faculty Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD, is a hospitalist and the Associate Director of Inpatient Quality at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston. He has worked in southern Africa on multiple occasions, completed medical school and residency at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and worked as an attending physician at the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle before joining BIDMC. On the wards, his work includes collaborating as a member of interdisciplinary teams of health care providers, coaching medical students and residents as they develop their communication skills, and caring for a broad variety of patients and their families. In his quality improvement role he leads several projects, including Conversation Ready at BIDMC.

Today s Agenda Introductions Debrief Session 3 Suggested Action Steward: Achieving the reliability of allergy information Leaving in Action

Webinar Series Objectives At the conclusion of this webinar series, participants will be able to: Articulate the vision and mission of The Conversation Project and different ways to approach end-of-life care conversations. Describe strategies that have worked for pioneer organizations to engage patients and families in discussions to understand what matters most to them at the end-of-life Explain ideas for reliably stewarding this information across the health care system, including strategies for working with electronic health records Teach ways to engage communities that help to activate the public in having these conversations in advance of a potential medical crisis Test methods to help staff engage in this work personally before exemplifying it for their patients Describe changes to CMS reimbursement policies for advanced care planning conversations

Conversation Ready Principles 1. Engage with our patients and families to understand what matters most to them at the end of life 2. Steward this information as reliably as we do allergy information 3. Respect people s wishes for care at the end of life by partnering to develop shared goals of care 4. Exemplify this work in our own lives so that we understand the benefits and challenges 5. Connect in a manner that is culturally and individually respectful of each patient Engage Steward Respect Exemplify Connect

Schedule of Calls Session 1 The Conversation Project: Reaching people where they live, work, and pray Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2017, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time Session 2 Engage: Moving from passive to proactive Date: Tuesday, June 6, 2017, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time Session 3 Steward: Achieving the reliability of allergy information Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time Session 4 Respect: Meeting people where they are as illness advances Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2016, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time Session 5 The Exemplify Principle in Action/ Connecting In a Culturally Respectful Manner Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time Session 6 CMS Reimbursement Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2:00 PM-3:00 PM Eastern Time

The Steward Principle Achieving the reliability of allergy information Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD

Suggested Action (spans sessions 3 and 4) Review the charts of the last 20 patients* who died in your setting. As you review the charts, note evidence of the following: Advance directive documents are accessible and can be understood by the care team (i.e., not just a Yes/No notation that the patient has an advance directive); Documentation of provider and patient conversation(s) or conversation(s) with a surrogate decision maker, if the patient is not able to participate about What matters? to the patient regarding end-of-life care wishes; Location of death; Whether patient received life-sustaining treatment; A few details about the patient s medical history and situation immediately prior to death; and The presence of indicators about whether the care the patient received was aligned with their documented end-of-life care wishes. Consider including representatives from the involved clinical services in the review, to understand their perspectives on the care provided and to engage them in the work. * We recommend 20 for a fuller picture of your system but if that is a stopper, then do 10.

For today: For each patient chart attribute reviewed, quantify what you learned from this review. For example, for the 20 patient charts reviewed: 85 percent of charts reviewed had documented surrogate decision maker 65 percent of charts reviewed had accessible advance directive 50 percent of charts reviewed had documented provider and patient discussions about end-of-life care wishes Of the patients for whom there was documentation of directive/end-of-life care wishes: 50 percent had indicators that the care received was consistent with the patient s end-of-life care wishes 30 percent had indicators that the care received was not consistent with the patient s end-of-life care wishes 20 percent did not have enough information to indicate either way

What we learned How many charts did you review? What percent had a Documented surrogate decision maker? Accessible advance directive? Documented provider and patient discussions about end-of-life care wishes? Important to identify and navigate around barriers to data collection

Agenda What does it mean to steward? Retaining Hope vs. Reliability Health System Explore the process of advance care planning for an individual patient Describe the vision of population health management Consider the systems needed to do this work reliably Examples of what others are doing Leaving in Action

The Tale of Two Health Systems Retaining Hope Health Care Reliability Health Care A look at the Steward principle

Retaining Hope Health Care At Retaining Hope Health Care, fragmented and unreliable processes and systems cause information about advance directives and conversations about wishes for end of life care to be scattered among patient records and inaccessible across time and boundaries. When asked about documentation of wishes, patients say that they gave a copy to their doctor or have them locked up in a safe deposit box. Although providers have high reliability in tracking patient allergies, the same cannot be said of end of life care wishes.

Reliability Health Care At Reliability Health Care, information about patients wishes for end of life care are inquired about, tracked, and confirmed as reliably as allergy information. An integrated information system makes information about both relevant documents and critical conversations with providers easily accessible in a timely way and across boundaries of care. Just as allergy information should not be hidden in safe deposit boxes, patients understand that their wishes are an important driver of their care plans.

Definitions Steward: Treat information about each patient s end-of-life care wishes as reliably as we do allergy information Reliable: consistently good in quality or performance; able to be trusted

Advance care planning as a process Patient establishes care > > Serious illness Organ failure Terminal illness Frailty Nears the end of life > > Active dying Death Provider A Usually outpatient Forms a relationship Reach and Record: Health care proxy Conversations MOLST Provider B Often inpatient Often no preceding relationship Retrieve data to help ensure care is congruent with wishes Respect Allergy analogy Lunney et al., Profiles of Older Medicare Decedents, J Am Geriatr Soc, 2002

Towards population health management Consensus about serious illness Clinician gestalt surprise question Specific disease criteria Mortality models eprognosis.ucsf.edu Levine and Gagne scores Specific aspects of advance care planning Legally authorized surrogate decision maker Conversations about: Illness, prognosis Full range of options What matters most Appropriate use of POLST/MOLST Tracking, measuring, reflecting Proxy Conversations Illness Prognosis Options What matters most

Pause Questions? Comments?

Build systems that can Steward for one patient while supporting population-level reliability Consider the end users Go to gemba and ask what is their workflow? what data do they find helpful? Collect the data into a single source of truth Consider the types of data and how they are collected E.g. names and phone numbers, scanned PDFs, conversations Manage the collected data Version control Use the collected data Measure and learn

Rule of 5s Change Areas 5 25 125 625 3125 Asking about a surrogate decision maker Physician asks at primary care visit RN asks during vital signs MA asks during rooming Patients enter information through portal??? Conversations about what matters most Pen and paper Standardized form EHR note EHR template??? POLST/MOLST forms Photocopy in paper chart Practice administrator scans Medical records department scans Managed registry with multiple inputs???

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Electronic Medical Record

Virginia Mason Medical Center s Electronic Medical Record

Epic

Reports from the Conversation Ready Community The IHI Project was a great stimulus for us. Our main inpatient successes were getting advance directives prominently available on our EMR, getting information about them earlier and more accurately in the admission process, improving access by having them scanned in daily (we purchased scanners for the unit clerks on every floor) -Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY Chart reviews revealed wrong documents being placed in EMR advance directive file and current AD forms were not user friendly so are being revised also difficult to access advance directives in the EMR, so changed menu to include them and moved them to prime real estate on a summary page for greater visibility/accessibility. Winter Park Memorial Hospital, FL

Reports from the Conversation Ready Community Our Conversation Ready team has continued to meet monthly and is going strong [We are getting] new scanning software with our EMR to make it easier to find the AD and POLST forms St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA We continue to struggle with ease of documentation of these discussions in a single repository where all regional health care providers can access these. Our system is making a move to Epic as our EMR in the next 2 years so we will be aggressively planning to improve that with this change. St. Charles Health System, Bend, OR

Reports from the Conversation Ready Community The IT working group developed EPIC AD scanning capability throughout the hospital This initiative gave unit secretaries the ability to scan in existing AD and access previously obtained AD We are transitioning over the next year to EPIC as the EMR for all Penn care. The CR initiatives helped drive the EPIC chart builds that allowed us to develop a goals tab that supports any member of the team to enter information regarding their goals conversations, ease of access to existing AD and review of these discussions and changes throughout various points of care delivery. we are [also] testing an Advance Directive electronic platform to capture goals and push completed forms to identified emails such as the identified representative and with our goal to place directly in the Penn chart new EMR. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

What about sharing data outside your system? A universal problem How do you do it for other types of medical information? Discharge summaries, medication lists, etc. Leverage existing systems and consider a conversation when it s complex Healthcare information exchange Creating standards for data collection and sharing https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/healthinformation-exchange/what-hie Registries For example: http://www.orpolstregistry.org/

Lessons learned It s really important to get this part right it is a critical foundation for this work There often isn t a fast solution, and you ll need to make adjustments as you scale Consider who you need to engage in this work

Action Period Assignment (spans sessions 3 and 4) Review the charts of the last 20 patients* who died in your setting. As you review the charts, note evidence of the following: Advance directive documents are accessible and can be understood by the care team (i.e., not just a Yes/No notation that the patient has an advance directive); Documentation of provider and patient conversation(s) or conversation(s) with a surrogate decision maker, if the patient is not able to participate about What matters? to the patient regarding end-of-life care wishes; Location of death; Whether patient received life-sustaining treatment; A few details about the patient s medical history and situation immediately prior to death; and The presence of indicators about whether the care the patient received was aligned with their documented end-of-life care wishes. Consider including representatives from the involved clinical services in the review, to understand their perspectives on the care provided and to engage them in the work. * We recommend 20 for a fuller picture of your system but if that is a stopper, then do 10.

To share for session July 11: Briefly document two stories gleaned from the review that illustrate current end-of-life care processes (to help build will among colleagues and create a clearer picture of reasons to engage in work). For example: Mr. S had a note in his patient chart that an advance directive existed, but it was not accessible in the patient chart. There was no documentation of discussions with providers about end-of-life care goals, and the care team was not able to determine alignment of care goals and Mr. S s end-of-life care wishes. Ms. W had an accessible advance directive and detailed notes about end-of-life care goals in her patient record, and she was transferred to an inpatient hospice unit in apparent alignment with her wishes. Information from the review can be used to guide team conversations about setting an aim, selecting a subpopulation, and identifying the best location for pilot testing. Additionally, this information can help build will when discussing work with colleagues.

Session 4 Respect: Meeting people where they are as illness advances Kate Lally, MD, FACP Director of Palliative Care at Care New England Health System and Medical Director of Care New England VNA Hospice Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD Hospitalist and the Associate Director of Inpatient Quality at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) Tuesday, July 11, 2-3 PM Eastern

Thank You! Please let us know if you have any questions or feedback following today s Expedition webinar.

Evaluation Survey & Continuing Nursing Education Eligibility for Nursing CEU requires submission of an evaluation survey for each participant requesting continuing education: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/tcp062017 Share this link with all of your participants if viewing today s webinar as a group (Survey closes June 30) Be sure to include your contact information and Florida nursing license number FHA will report 1.0 credit hour to CE Broker and a certificate will be sent via e-mail (Please allow at least 2 weeks after the survey closes)