Appendix E: Public Participation

Appendix E: Public Participation

TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION... E-1 E.1 PROJECT WEBSITE... E-1 E.2 GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE SCOPING PERIOD... E-1 E.2.1 PUBLIC SCOPING NOTIFICATION... E-1 E.2.1.1 Scoping Notification Letters... E-1 E.2.1.2 Postcard Mailers... E-3 E.2.1.3 Press Releases... E-3 E.2.1.4 Newspaper Display Advertisements... E-3 E.2.2 SCOPING MEETINGS... E-3 E.2.3 PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS... E-4 E.2.3.1 Proposed Action/Alternatives... E-5 E.2.3.2 Study Area... E-5 E.2.3.3 Marine Mammals/Sea Turtles... E-5 E.2.3.4 Marine Mammal Monitoring... E-5 E.2.3.5 Fish/Marine Habitat... E-5 E.2.3.6 Terrestrial/Birds... E-5 E.2.3.7 Water Quality... E-5 E.2.3.8 Air Quality... E-5 E.2.3.9 Noise... E-6 E.2.3.10 Cultural Resources... E-6 E.2.3.11 Reefs... E-6 E.2.3.12 Land Use... E-6 E.2.3.13 Commercial/Recreational Fishing... E-6 E.2.3.14 Regional Economy... E-6 E.2.3.15 Public Health and Safety... E-6 E.2.3.16 SONAR/Underwater Explosions... E-6 E.2.3.17 Marianas Trench National Monument/Piti Marine Preserve... E-6 E.2.3.18 Mitigation... E-6 E.2.3.19 Cumulative... E-7 E.2.3.20 Other... E-7 LIST OF TABLES TABLE E-1: PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENT SUMMARY... E-4 LIST OF FIGURES There are no figures in this section. APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION i

This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ii

APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION This appendix includes information about the public s participation in the development of the Mariana Islands Training and Testing (MITT) Activities Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Overseas EIS (OEIS). E.1 PROJECT WEBSITE A public website was established specifically for this project: http://www.mitt-eis.com/. This website address was published in the Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Overseas Impact Statement (Notice of Intent) and has subsequently been re-printed in all newspaper advertisements, agency letters, and public postcards. The Scoping Meeting Fact Sheets and various other materials will be available on the project website throughout the course of the project. E.2 GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE SCOPING PERIOD The public scoping period began with the issuance of the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register on 16 September 2011. This notice included a project description and scoping meeting dates and locations. The scoping period lasted 60 days, concluding on 7 November 2011. Section E.2.1 describes the United States (U.S.) Department of the Navy s (Navy s) notification efforts during scoping. The scoping period allowed a variety of opportunities for the public to comment on the scope of the EIS/OEIS. E.2.1 PUBLIC SCOPING NOTIFICATION The Navy made significant efforts at notifying the public to ensure maximum public participation during the scoping process. A summary of these efforts follows. E.2.1.1 Scoping Notification Letters Elected Officials: U.S. Congressional Delegate, Washington D.C. Office Guam Office of the Governor 31st Guam Legislature Village of Agana Heights Village of Agat Village of Asan-Maina Village of Barrigada Village of Chalan Pago-Ordot Village of Dededo Village of Hagåtña Village of Inarajan Village of Mangilao Village of Merizo Village of MongMong-Toto-Maite Village of Piti Village of Santa Rita Village of Sinajana Village of Talofofo Village of Tamuning-Tumon-Harmon Village of Umatac Village of Yigo Village of Yona APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-1

13th Rota Municipal Council Rota Mayor's Office Saipan Mayor s Office Tinian Mayor s Office CNMI House of Representatives CNMI Public Information and Protocol Office CNMI Senate Government Agencies Federal: Federal Aviation Administration National Park Service, War in the Pacific National Historic Park National Marine Fisheries Service Habitat Division, Guam Office National Marine Fisheries Service, CNMI Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District U.S. Coast Guard Sector Guam Officer in Charge Marine Inspections U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, West Area Office U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Saipan Service Center U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Insular Affairs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, Pacific Islands Contact Office, Honolulu U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Guam U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Guam National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office Government Agencies Local: A.B. Won Pat International Airport, Guam Department of Military Affairs/Guam Air National Guard Guam Bureau of Statistics and Plans, Coastal Management Program Guam Chamorro Land Trust Commission Guam Department of Agriculture Guam Department of Agriculture, Division of Aquatics and Wildlife Resources Guam Department of Parks and Recreation, Historic Preservation Office Guam Environmental Protection Agency Guam Environmental Protection Agency, Water Resources Management Program Guam Homeland Security, Office of Civil Defense Guam Visitors Bureau Guam Waterworks Authority CNMI Coastal Resources Management Program CNMI Department of Community and Cultural Affairs, Historic Preservation Office CNMI Department of Lands and Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture CNMI Department of Lands and Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife CNMI Department of Lands and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation CNMI Department of Public Lands CNMI Department of Public Safety, Office of the Commissioner APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-2

CNMI Department of Public Safety, Tinian Fire Division CNMI Division of Environmental Quality Other: CNMI Northern Marianas College Cooperative, Research, Extension and Education Service Saipan Chamber of Commerce Guam Community College University of Guam University of Guam Water and Environmental Research Institute An additional 10 stakeholders were sent a personalized notification letter on 9 September 2011, that offered a briefing. Recipients included: Congressional Delegate Guam District Office Congressional Delegate Saipan District Office Guam Office of the Governor 31st Guam Legislature Mayors' Council of Guam Military Integration Management Committee CNMI Department of Commerce Guam Chamber of Commerce Saipan Chamber of Commerce Tinian Chamber of Commerce E.2.1.2 Postcard Mailers On 12 September 2011, postcards announcing the Notice of Intent and providing the scoping meeting dates, locations, and times were mailed to 475 organizations and individuals on the project mailing list, which was compiled from the previous Mariana Islands Range Complex (MIRC) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) project mailing lists. E.2.1.3 Press Releases Press releases to announce the Notice of Intent were distributed on 9 September 2011. E.2.1.4 Newspaper Display Advertisements Advertisements were made to announce the scoping meetings in the following newspapers on the dates indicated below: Marianas Variety Pacific Daily News Saipan Tribune 9 September 2011 9 September 2011 9 September 2011 21 September 2011 16 September 2011 19 September 2011 27 September 2011 21 September 2011 23 September 2011 28 September 2011 22 September 2011 24 September 2011 29 September 2011 23 September 2011 26 September 2011 E.2.2 SCOPING MEETINGS Five scoping meetings were held on September 22, 23, 26, 27, and 29 in the villages of Mangilao, Guam; Santa Rita, Guam; Susupe, Saipan; San Jose Village, Tinian; and Songson Village, Rota, respectively. At APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-3

each scoping meeting, staffers at the welcome station greeted guests and encouraged them to sign in to be added to the project mailing list to receive future notifications. In total, 229 people signed in at the welcome table. The meetings were held in an open house format, presenting informational posters and written information, with Navy staff and project experts available to answer participants questions. Additionally, a digital voice recorder was available to record participants oral comments. The interaction during the information sessions was productive and helpful to the Navy. What is a scoping meeting? The scoping period determines the extent of the EIS in terms of significant issues. Scoping meetings allow the face-to-face exchange of information and ideas to ensure relevant topics are identified and properly studied and that the Draft EIS is thorough and balanced. E.2.3 PUBLIC SCOPING COMMENTS Scoping participants submitted comments in five ways: Oral statements at the public meetings (as recorded by the digital voice recorder) Written comments at the public meetings Written letters (received any time during the public comment period) Electronic mail (received any time during the public comment period) Comments submitted directly on the project website (received any time during the public comment period) In total, the Navy received comments from 34 individuals and groups. Because many of the comments addressed more than one issue, 135 total comments resulted. Table E-1 provides a breakdown of areas of concern based on comments received during scoping. The summary following Table E-1 provides an overview of comments and is organized by area of concern. Table E-1: Public Scoping Comment Summary Area of Concern Count Percent of Total Proposed Action/Alternatives 9 7 Study Area 7 5 Marine Mammals/Sea Turtles 7 5 Marine Mammal Monitoring 5 4 Fish/Marine Habitat 8 6 Terrestrial/Birds 10 7 Water Quality 5 4 Air Quality 1 1 Noise 2 1 Cultural Resources 5 4 Reefs 3 2 Land Use 5 4 Commercial/Recreational Fishing 6 4 Regional Economy 9 7 APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-4

Table E-1: Public Scoping Comment Summary (continued) Area of Concern Count Percent of Total E.2.3.1 Public Health & Safety 6 4 SONAR/Underwater Explosions 6 4 Marianas Trench National Monument/Piti Marine Preserve Area 3 2 Mitigation 8 6 Cumulative 8 6 Other 21 16 TOTAL 134 99 Proposed Action/Alternatives Comments in this category included whether NEPA applied in the open ocean, if other training sites were options, and whether some proposed sites in the Study Area could be avoided. E.2.3.2 Study Area Participants expressed concerned regarding the larger size of Study Area. Participants expressed confusion between the MIRC Study Area and the new MITT Study Area and why the boundaries have changed. E.2.3.3 Marine Mammals/Sea Turtles Participants expressed concern that military activity would drive marine mammals to other locations. Participants expressed concern over impacts from Sound Navigation and Ranging (sonar) and underwater explosives. E.2.3.4 Marine Mammal Monitoring Respondents inquired as to whether monitoring was taking place and if it would continue, and generally requested the results of any monitoring that had taken place to date. E.2.3.5 Fish/Marine Habitat Concerns in this area were related to potential harm to fish and habitat during military training activities. E.2.3.6 Terrestrial/Birds Comments in this category included concerns regarding military training impacts on seabirds on Farallon de Medinilla, general injury of wildlife, monitoring of the Mariana fruit bats/swiftlets/common moorhen, and bird aircraft strike hazards. E.2.3.7 Water Quality Water quality comments included general concerns regarding potential contaminants in the water. E.2.3.8 Air Quality One respondent noted a general concern regarding the impact of military training on air quality. APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-5

E.2.3.9 Noise Respondents commented on the potential impact of noise on the public, wildlife, and areas outside of military installation boundaries. E.2.3.10 Cultural Resources One respondent was concerned about impacts on and access to historical medicinal plants. Other respondents made comments related to the historical resources of the region. E.2.3.11 Reefs Participant expressed concern regarding the impact of military training on reefs. E.2.3.12 Land Use Land use comments ranged from respondents not wanting the military to use the land at all to concerns regarding overall cumulative effects on land-based resources. E.2.3.13 Commercial/Recreational Fishing Comments concerned the limitations placed on fishermen as a result of military activity. One participant suggested that additional military personnel brought to the region should be given a special orientation regarding the local population and resources. Additional comments included concern regarding restrictions to prime fishing areas. E.2.3.14 Regional Economy There were several comments regarding regional economic concerns, including questions about the effects on commercial shipping and commercial fishing. E.2.3.15 Public Health and Safety Respondents commented on the overall potential cumulative impacts related to public health and safety. E.2.3.16 SONAR/Underwater Explosions Concerns were expressed regarding the impact of sonar and underwater explosives on marine mammals and sea turtles. E.2.3.17 Marianas Trench National Monument/Piti Marine Preserve One participant questioned whether the Marianas Trench National Monument was included in the Study Area and, if it was, whether special environmental precautions would be taken in the vicinity of the monument. E.2.3.18 Mitigation Participants wanted to ensure that mitigations were discussed in the Draft EIS/OEIS and asked for reports of the effectiveness of mitigations put in place as a result of the MIRC Record of Decision. A suggestion was made that a communication line be established between the military and the office of the Mayor of Rota for notification of military exercises at least two weeks ahead of time. APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-6

E.2.3.19 Cumulative Comments in this category expressed concern about the overall impact of military activity in Guam and in overall MITT Study Area. E.2.3.20 Other This category of comments related to the desire for the military activities to take place somewhere other than the Mariana Islands, that the documents were not available at the library that had been publicized, issues with use of the project website, concern regarding the way information was conveyed to the public, concern regarding termination of public leases as a result of the Proposed Action, a desire for reporting of the adequacy of Notices to Mariners and Notices to Airmen, excitement regarding their ability to be involved in the NEPA process, and praise to the Navy presenters at the public meetings. APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX E PUBLIC PARTICIPATION E-8