Headlines of my presentation
|
|
- Timothy Poole
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geo and JC3IEDM enabled C2 Kay Lindgaard Pedersen Head of Solution Center, Systematic Software Engineering Headlines of my presentation Interoperability according to Systematic The Mother of JC3IEDM The Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP) from an Industry standpoint What is MIP after all? How broadly used is the MIP standard? MIP as foundation for Interoperability? Geo-Enabled Battle Command Geo and C2 what is the difference? How can COA bridge betw. Geo, M&S and C2? Information Superiority As Force Multiplier? How do we make all available information actionable? The technology is here, but is it in the hands of the warrior? 2 1
2 Interoperability of Yesterday HQ s planning - Written Orders - Plastic overlays Dispatch Riders distributing: - Written Orders -Paper maps - Plastic overlays... measured in hours 3 Interoperability requirements Today! Must be deployable for Coalitions and Joint Proven to work in theater through extensive tests Update cycle... measured in seconds 4 2
3 Interoperability according to Systematic Net- Centric Coalition Partner Net-Centric Battlefield Network Web Services Replication Messaging (MTF) Complete Interoperability Solution from Systematic National Information System 5 Interoperability according to Systematic National MIP Information Coalition Partner System National Messaging Information Coalition Partner System Net- Centric Coalition Partner Net-Centric Battlefield Network Web Services Replication Messaging (MTF) MIP Coalition Partner Complete Interoperability Solution from Systematic Messaging Coalition Partner National Information System 6 3
4 What is MIP after all? The aim of the Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP) is to achieve: international interoperability of Command and Control Information Systems (C2IS) interoperability at all levels from corps to battalion, or lowest appropriate level to support multinational combined and joint operations (MIP Organization) 7 The MIP challenge Task Org. wise xxx xx xx x x XX x x l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l II II II II X X l 8 4
5 MIP is broadly used Association of voluntary and independent Nations FULL MEMBERS CAN TacC2IS DNK DACCIS + NMS FRA SICF, SIR DEU HEROS-2/1 ITA SIACCON NLD ISIS NOR NORTaC/NORCCIS ESP SIMACET TUR TACCIS GBR ATacCS/ComBAT USA MCS ASSOCIATE MEMBERS AUS JCCS, BCSS LTU TAVVIS AUT PHOENIX POL SZAFRAN BEL ISIS PRT SICCE BUL FICIS ROU SIAAB CZE GF-TCCS SVN SITAWARE FIN FINACCIS SWE ISMARK,SLB GRC HARCCIS ACT BiSC - AIS HUN HAVIR JFC *Country codes according NATO STANAG 1059 Ed 8. 9 MIP as foundation for Interoperability 1 Comprehensive tests to prove interoperability: MIP System level Test 1 (MSLT 1 (Internet Test)) MIP System level Test 2 MSLT 2 (Internet/On-site Test)) MIP System level Test 3 MSLT 3 (On-site Test)) MIP Operational Level Test (MOLT) (On Site Test)) Triad Vignette Dissemination Vignette Continuous Vignette 10 5
6 MIP as foundation for Interoperability 2 Inception Elaboration Construction Baseline 2 Integration Transition Baseline Release Inception FOC Elaboration In service period Construction Baseline 3 Integration FOC Transition Baseline Release In service period Inception Elaboration Baseline 4 Construction Integration Today FOC Transition B4 Release In service p MIP as foundation for Interoperability 2 Combined Endeavor (CE) Multi-National Corps Trial Coalition Warrior Interoperability Demonstration (CWID) Nato Response Force (NRF) scenario ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION
7 MIP wrap-up The best trade-off between Benefit: Operational readiness Extensive test program that requires commitment Time synchronized releases may slow development Benefit: Shortening the decision cycle Benefit: No single point of failure Instant and ongoing data sharing (one-off not good enough) Benefit: Internationally accepted Occasional foot dragging (the nations struggle to keep pace) Benefit: Honoring the physical limitations on Band-Width Sending small portions ( over-normalized database) High granularity in specifications (makes JC3IEDM complex) 13 Geo-Enabled Battle Command 14 7
8 Geo and C2 what is the difference C2 C2 is supporting the Art of War (MDMP, exec.) Plans & Orders, Situational Overview, Holdings, Timeline Geo is essential in understanding the Battlefield Key component in Situational Overview, IPB and BTRA JC3IEDM focus is full coverage of C2 and some Geo Today: Two overlapping environments Future: Closer integration between C2 and Geo/ERP/M&S/FASS... Geo (from road to route) Geo C2 ERP FASS Powerful MDMP and Tactical Solution M&S 15 From Road to Route Geo DB: The road from A to B (red) is represented as geo-feature by points JC3IEDM: The tactical graphic (black) that describes the advance route from A to B is represented by 7 points as used in JC3IEDM Merge of the two paradigms: Route described by references to Geo DB: geo-feature (the road) start point A end point B Back A B 16 8
9 The Systematic ESRI product offering MIP Coalition Partner MIPDEM A merge of two Of-The-Shelf products ArcGIS Engine 9.2, 3D Analyst Extension, MOLE SitaWare Information Superiority 18 9
10 Information Overload or Force Multiplier? How can the enormous amount of information become a competitive advantage? How can industry help? 19 Computerized decision support Aggregate and filter information from both people and sensors to keep the commanders focused on the overall picture allow distribution on limited tactical networks provide value to a large audience route right information to relevant audience Terabytes Megabytes UAV's Digitized terrain data Plans and Situational Picture Infra Red sensors Satellite feed Radars Actionable data 20 10
11 Funnel example Course Of Action Satellite feed Radars IR sensors Mission Analysis Develop COAs Analyze COAs (Wargaming) and decision Write OPORD Terrain Weather Population Obstacles... (The Fairfax Framework) Continuous IPB process 21 Funnel example Course Of Action Satellite feed Radars IR sensors Mission Analysis Develop COAs Analyze COAs (Wargaming) and decision Write OPORD Terrain Weather Population Obstacles... (The Fairfax Framework) Continuous IPB process 22 11
12 Funnel example Course Of Action Satellite feed Radars IR sensors Mission Analysis Develop COAs Analyze COAs (Wargaming) and decision Write OPORD Terrain Weather Population Obstacles... (The Fairfax Framework) Continuous IPB process 23 Live Demo
13 Wrap up on Product Demo SitaWare provides Interoperability through: A globally accepted standard MIP Instant Connectivity and Replication between Coalition Partners Merge of GIS and MIP in a C2 solution Intuitive User Interface COTS product 25 SitaWare variants Battle Management System (BMS) 26 13
14 Integrated Solution with C2 and Office Tools The information portal is the entry to the CCIS The user has a set of tightly integrated tools: C2 SitaWare Office Documents Messaging Outlook & IRIS IOM FAS tools 27 Effective Working Environment The right tools are available: Tactical graphics Geographic overview Making orders/plans, briefings, memos, as on paper. Collaboration through: Portal Alerts Military Messages C2 information Chat Forums Support by: Workflows Templates Re-use of previous orders/plans, briefings, Automatic briefings? 28 14
15 Thank you for your attention Questions? 29 Back-up slides 30 15
16 The Fairfax Framework participants C 4 I Center 31 The Fairfax Framework objectives George Mason University US Army TEC SitaWare og ESRI (BTRA) (Future) Mäk Systematic (SitaWare) 32 16
17 The Fairfax Framework evolution The past Today The future Fairfax Framework 33 The Fairfax Framework whitepaper Whitepaper awarded at European Simulation Interoperability Workshop (Euro SIW) June 2007 Authors: Dr. J. Mark Pullen Dr. Michael R. Hieb C4I Center - George Mason University David Swann Gary Scoffield ESRI Kay Pedersen James Muguira Systematic Software Engineering Back Michael W. Powers Topographic Engineering Center US Army ERDC 34 17
18 From Road to Route Geo DB: The road from A to B (red) is represented as geo-feature by points JC3IEDM: The tactical graphic (black) that describes the advance route from A to B is represented by 7 points as used in JC3IEDM Merge of the two paradigms: Route described by references to Geo DB: geo-feature (the road) start point A end point B Back A B 35 MIP Organization MIP Steering Group (MSG) Chair Vice Chair Programme Management Group (PMG) Chair Vice Chair EJR TS, FIN, JIC JRL, RBJ Operational Working Group Chair (OWG) Systems Engineering & Architecture Working Group (SEAWG) Data Modelling Working Group (DMWG) Test & Evaluation Working Group (TEWG) Configuration Control Working Group (CCWG) Deputy NDAG Back Multi-Disciplinary Working Parties (MDWPs) 36 18
19 MIP Block 2 MSLT 3 test coverage 37 MIP Block 2 MSLT 3 test result 38 19
20 Systematic s IRIS products IRIS Forms IRIS Organisational Messaging 39 IRIS Information Mapping Tool (IMT) 40 20
C4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationBattle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning
A Geospatial Battle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning Presented to the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium Paper I-110 Michael Powers Topographic Engineering
More informationIntegrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation
Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation Dr. J. Mark Pullen and Dr. Stanley Levine C4I Center, George Mason University Dr. Kevin Heffner, Pegasus Simulation Lionel Khimeche,
More informationC-IED Working Group Update to the C-IED Conference. COL Juan GÓMEZ MARTIN C-IED WG Chairman
C-IED Working Group Update to the C-IED Conference COL Juan GÓMEZ MARTIN C-IED WG Chairman 21 June 2016 1 Agenda WG Composition Last meeting AJP-3.15 Way Ahead NATO C-IED Action Plan Revision 2 (APR2)
More informationEnhancing Joint and Coalition Interoperability
U.S. Joint Staff J6 Deputy Directorate for Cyber and C4 Integration (DD C5I) Enhancing Joint and Coalition Interoperability 25 October 2017 Scott Shephard Coalition Interoperability Division J6 Strategic
More informationE CONOMIC IMPACT OF P RECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT
E CONOMIC IMPACT OF P RECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT The Case for Decent Work, UNITE, 23 July 2015 Daragh McCarthy NERI (Nevin Economic Research Institute) Daragh.McCarthy@nerinstitute.net www.nerinstitute.net OVERVIEW
More informationLESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW
LESSON DESCRIPTION: LESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW In this lesson you will learn the requirements and procedures surrounding intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB).
More informationLessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations
Lessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations Jean-Pierre FAYE (Behalf the MSG-128 TG) MSG-143 Symposium, Bucharest,
More informationISU World Synchronized Skating Championships 2018, Stockholm / SWE
ISU World Synchronized Skating Championships 2018, Stockholm / SWE Wednesday, April 4 Thursday, April 5 Friday, April 6 Saturday, April 7 Free Practice 0 Free Practice 0 Free Practice 0 Free Practice 0
More informationLONG-TERM CARE DATA: PROGRESS AND PROPOSED NEXT STEPS. Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents Paris, October 2012
LONG-TERM CARE DATA: PROGRESS AND PROPOSED NEXT STEPS Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents Paris, 11-12 October 2012 Purpose Review progress in data collection on long-term care (LTC) over
More informationThe effectiveness of R&D tax incentives
The effectiveness of R&D tax incentives Pierre Mohnen Workshop on the revision of state aid rules for research and development and innovation (R&D&I) Indirect government support through R&D tax incentives
More informationCooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence
Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence Col Ilmar Tamm Director 02 November 2010 Disclaimer This briefing is a product of the CCD COE. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0305192N - JOINT MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM Prior
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationMSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation
MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb 24-25 2010 Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the
More informationTowards more comparable data to assess the performance of health systems: Past, present and future work at OECD
Towards more comparable data to assess the performance of health systems: Past, present and future work at OECD Gaetan LAFORTUNE, OECD Health Division EUPHA Conference, Helsinki, 12 October 2007 1 1 Overview
More informationREGIONS BRIDGING THE DIVIDE: THE ROLE OF TRADABLE SECTORS AND WELL FUNCTIONING CITIES
REGIONS BRIDGING THE DIVIDE: THE ROLE OF TRADABLE SECTORS AND WELL FUNCTIONING CITIES 14th Meeting of the Expert Group on TERRITORIAL COHESION AND URBAN MATTERS 18 June 2018 Alexander C. Lembcke Economic
More informationCollaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems
Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems May 21, 2008 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Information Integration & Operations) ODUSD (Advanced Systems & Concepts Defense Research & Engineering 703-695-7938
More informationBattle Management Language Transformations
Battle Management Language Transformations Major Frederic Bernard CDEF / DSRO 1 Place Joffre 75005 Paris France frederic.bernard@cdef.terre.defense.gouv.fr Lionel Khimeche Délégation Générale pour l Armement
More informationhttps://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/index.html GOING DIGITAL IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND JOBS Research Institute for Economy, Trade and Industry, Tokyo, 7 March 2018 dirk.pilat@oecd.org Outline 1. The Digital
More informationAdding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048
Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048 Dr. Mark Pullen, Douglas Corner, Samuel Singapogu and Nicholas Clark, GMU C4I Center, USA Nicolas Cordonnier and Mohammad Mennane,
More informationDefence Expenditure of NATO Countries ( )
15 March/mars 2018 COMMUNIQUE PR/CP(2018)16 Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2010-2017) NATO collects defence expenditure data from Allies on a regular basis and presents aggregates and subsets of
More informationUse of Simulations in Support of the Multi-Sensor Aerospace-Ground Joint ISR Interoperability Coalition (MAJIIC) Project
Aerospace-Ground Joint ISR Interoperability Coalition (MAJIIC) Project Mr. Thomas Kreitmair and Ms. Diana Norgaard NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency Oude Waalsdorperweg 61 2597 AK The Hague
More informationC2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled
ABSTRACT Dr. J. Mark Pullen George Mason University C4I Center Fairfax, VA 22030 USA mpullen@c4i.gmu.edu Dr. Robert Wittman MITRE Corporation Modeling and Simulation Technical Center 7515 Colshire Drive,
More informationConsideration on Global Harmonization
ICDRA Workshop I Consideration on Global Harmonization Oct. 25, 2012 Dr. Nobumasa Nakashima Director, Office of International Programs PMDA, Japan 1 Current Harmonization Activities ICH: International
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
More informationGeographic Intelligence
MCWP 2-12.1 Geographic Intelligence U.S. Marine Corps 6 July 2000 PCN 143 000067 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, DC 20380-1775 6 July 2000 FOREWORD Marine
More informationPERFORMANCE OF THE BELGIUM HEALTH SYSTEM IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
PERFORMANCE OF THE BELGIUM HEALTH SYSTEM IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON Academic session: Looking back with an eye on the future 13 January 2017 Mark Pearson - Deputy Director Employment, Labour and Social
More information21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability
21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability Topics Interoperability/Integration and Security Names of Authors Dr. Kenneth
More informationExtensible Battle Management Language
Extensible Battle Management Language Dr. Michael Hieb Alion Dr. Hieb is an Architect of the US Army Simulation to C4I Interoperability Overarching Integrated Product Team. He can be reached at (703) 933-3376.
More informationUnified Action USJFCOM and Center for Army Lessons Learned Sectoral Handbooks
Unified Action USJFCOM and Center for Army Lessons Learned Sectoral Handbooks December 2008 Distribution Statement C Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors, representatives
More informationHazim Hodžić LTC (AF BiH)
Conference on Regional Security Dynamics in the Western Balkans Session 3 Regionalization of security and defense policies, comparing Nordic with Balkan experiences - Perspective from Peace Support Operations
More information10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. The Future of C2
10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium The Future of C2 THE ROLE OF THE COALITION WARRIOR INTEROPERABILITY DEMONSTRATION IN THE CANADIAN FORCES JOINT EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM
More informationIntelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Cpt.instr. Ovidiu SIMULEAC Intelligence Preparation of Battlefield or IPB as it is more commonly known is a Command and staff tool that allows systematic, continuous
More informationUS Army Europe Joint Multinational Training Command
US Army Europe Joint Multinational Training Command TSAE Tap In: Disseminating US Army Europe Training and Exercise Capability with ArcGIS Esri IUC 2016 28 Jun 2016 Sustainable Range Program Responsible
More informationCommand and staff service. No. 10/5 The logistic and medical support service during C2 operations.
Command and staff service No. 10/5 The logistic and medical support service during C2 operations. Course objectives: to clear up of responsibilities and duties of S-1,S-4 and health assistant at the CP,
More informationEvaluating the Proposed Coalition Battle Management Language Standard as a Basis for Enhanced C2 to M&S Interoperability
J. Mark Pullen, D.Sc. Michael R. Hieb, PhD. Center of Excellence in C4I George Mason University 4400 University Drive Fairfax, VA 22030 USA Voice: (1) 703-993-3682 Fax: (1) 703-993-1706 mpullen@gmu.edu
More informationEvolution of the SHAPE Staff Structure, 1951-Present
1 June 2017 Evolution of the SHAPE Staff Structure, 1951-Present This paper describes the different ways that the staff of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe has been organized, beginning with
More informationNel Agency training requests for 2019
Nel Agency, E&T Service Line Oude Waalsdorperweg 61 2597 AK The Hague The Netherlands Telephone: +31 70 3743730 E-mail: training@ncia.nato.int To Subject See Distribution Nel Agency training requests for
More informationARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call
Electronic Systems Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook Forecast International projects that the
More informationFiscal Policies for Innovation and Growth
Fiscal Policies for Innovation and Growth Chapter 2 of the April 2016 Fiscal Monitor Peterson Institute March 31, 2016 1 Growth at the frontier United States Real GDP per Capita, 1929-2030 (2009 dollars,
More informationObstacle Planning at Task-Force Level and Below
Chapter 5 Obstacle Planning at Task-Force Level and Below The goal of obstacle planning is to support the commander s intent through optimum obstacle emplacement and integration with fires. The focus at
More informationCapabilities Development & Integration Directorate. Dismounted Mission Command
Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate Dismounted Mission Command 1 Dismounted Mission Command Transition to Mobile HH CE Incremental Modernization Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate
More information[ Command & Control systems ] member of ICZ GROUP
[ Command & Control systems ] member of ICZ GROUP WHERE WE ARE ICZ a. s., Na hřebenech II 1718/10, 140 00 Prague 4, Czech Republic tel.: +420 222 271 111 E-mail: delinfo@iczgroup.com, marketing@iczgroup.com
More informationGeospatial Battle Management Language (geobml)
Geospatial Battle Management Language () Geo-environmental Information Response to et-centric and Distributed Operations Objective of Geo-environmental Information To increase the agility of Battle Command
More informationMSA Gap Analysis Training & Material
MSA Gap Analysis Training & Material 10 OCTOBER 2013 CDR (TUR N) Mahmut KARAGOZ Current MSA Gaps Training No training plan is in place (either a formal course or on the job training). Information sharing
More informationDeveloping a Tactical Geospatial Course for Army Engineers. By Jared L. Ware
Developing a Tactical Geospatial Course for Army Engineers By Jared L. Ware ESRI technology, such as the templates, gives the Army an easy-to-use, technical advantage that helps Soldiers optimize GEOINT
More informationSingle Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
More informationCollaborative coordination of fire support mission execution
Negative Impacts of Ignoring Stakeholder Quality Attributes Joint Fire Support (FS) Command and Control (C2) Case Study May 2007 Presented to SATURN By John Andrew Landmesser PROJECT MANAGER BATTLE COMMAND
More informationThe Concept of C2 Communication and Information Support
The Concept of C2 Communication and Information Support LTC. Ludek LUKAS Military Academy/K-302 Kounicova str.65, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic tel.: +420 973 444834 fax:+420 973 444832 e-mail: ludek.lukas@vabo.cz
More informationTHE JOINT STAFF Fiscal Year (FY) 2008/2009 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 228 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE
More informationFuture Battle Command: Geospatially-Enabled
Future Battle Command: Geospatially-Enabled ESRI Federal User Conference 21 February, 2008 John J. Day Director, Defense Business Development ESRI, Inc. 1 Outline Geospatially-enabled Battle Command What
More informationJoint Command and Control Capability Portfolio Management (JC2 CPM)
Joint Command and Control Capability Portfolio Management (JC2 CPM) Transforming the Force to Efficiently and Effectively Execute Precision Engagement to Precision Strike Association Summer Forum 11 July
More informationFM AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS
Field Manual No. FM 3-01.7 FM 3-01.7 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 31 October 2000 FM 3-01.7 AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY BRIGADE OPERATIONS Table of Contents PREFACE Chapter 1 THE ADA BRIGADE
More informationThe Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control
The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control Major Ulf Jinnestrand Swedish Armed Forces Headquarters Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting
More informationEvent with description Dates Location
BLACK SWAN 18 To train the integration of Special Forces and General Purpose Forces on tactical level in unconventional and hybrid environment. To create conditions to conduct SOFEVAL for two SO(L)TGs.
More informationTHE CZECH ARMY C2 AND SIMULATION SYSTEMS AND DECISION MAKING SUPPORT ARCHITECTURE
THE CZECH ARMY C2 AND SIMULATION SYSTEMS AND DECISION MAKING SUPPORT ARCHITECTURE BURITA Ladislav, HOPJAN Miroslav Military Academy in Brno 65, Kounicova Street, K-303, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic Phone:
More informationMission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
More informationEnhancing tactical communications with more cohesive solutions
Photo courtesy of US Department of Defense Enhancing tactical communications with more cohesive solutions There s no need to state the importance of tactical communications to defence forces the world
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationJoint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description
Overview Mr. Chuck Walker JWARN Acquisition Program Manager Joint Project Manager Information Systems (858) 537-0215 chuck.walker@jpmis.mil 1 2 JWARN Description Connects CBRN sensors directly to Joint
More informationSIMULATION AS A MISSION PLANNING AND REHEARSAL TOOL. William M. Garrabrants
Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference D.J. Medeiros, E.F. Watson, J.S. Carson and M.S. Manivannan, eds. SIMULATION AS A MISSION PLANNING AND REHEARSAL TOOL William M. Garrabrants VisiCom
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task Number: 07-6-1063 Task Title: Conduct a Linkup (Battalion - Brigade) Distribution Restriction: for public release; distribution is unlimited. Destruction Notice:
More informationCHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
More informationEUROCORPS, a tool for the European Union, NATO and UN. Use it or lose it!
26 th Feb. 2015 Brussels Subcommittee on Security and Defence Lieutenant-general BUCHSENSCHMIDT Commander Eurocorps EUROCORPS, a tool for the European Union, NATO and UN Use it or lose it! 1 EUROCORPS
More informationAcquisition Directorate Telephone: NCIA/ACQ/2017/ February 2017.
Acquisition Directorate ijeoma.ezeonwuka@ncia.nato.int Telephone: +32 2 707 8104 NCIA/ACQ/2017/1054 27 February 2017 To: Subject: Distribution List Amendment 1 to the Notification of Intent to Invite Bids
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
More informationTMD IPB MARCH 2002 AIR LAND SEA APPLICATION CENTER ARMY, MARINE CORPS, NAVY, AIR FORCE MULTISERVICE TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES
ARMY, MARINE CORPS, NAVY, AIR FORCE TMD IPB MULTISERVICE TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES FOR THEATER MISSILE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLESPACE FM 3-01.16 MCWP 2-12.1A NTTP 2-01.2
More informationIntroduction RESPONSIBILITIES
Introduction Throughout history, the knowledge and physical effects of terrain have played a dominant role in the development of society during both peace and war. Terrain is a portion of the earth s surface
More informationSummary Report for Individual Task 150-IPO-0009 Produce a Combined Information Overlay Status: Approved
Report Date: 10 Dec 2015 Summary Report for Individual Task 150-IPO-0009 Produce a Combined Information Overlay Status: Approved Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
More informationInformation Society and egovernment Developments in Croatia
Informatica 31 (2007) 501-yyy 501 Information Society and egovernment Developments in Croatia Božidar Kliček University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics Pavlinska 2, HR-42000 Varaždin,
More informationIntroduction of the Network Centric Warfare concept to Czech Armed Forces
Introduction of the Network Centric Warfare concept to Czech Armed Forces Paper Pavel Eichelmann and Luděk Lukáš Abstract One of the features determining the strength of troops is command and control.
More informationDefense Solutions: Overview. Karl Terrey Natalie Feuerstein
Defense Solutions: Overview Karl Terrey Natalie Feuerstein Meet the team Our Vision Provide a series of useful maps, apps, and tools that help ArcGIS user in the defense, intelligence, and para-military
More informationMission Definition. Joint: Army:
Its About the Mission Mission Definition Joint: 1. The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason for the action. 2. In common usage, especially when
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
More informationJoint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division JTLS & JCATS Program Manager M&S Analysis
More informationFM (FM ) Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the Field Artillery Battalion
22 March 2001 FM 3-09.21 (FM 6-20-1) Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the Field Artillery Battalion DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. ARMY HEADQUARTERS,
More informationJoint Battle Management Language (JBML) Project (Phase 1) Dr. Stan Levine. Outline. JBML Phase 1 Description/Status
Joint Battle Management Language (J) Project (Phase 1) Dr. Stan Levine May 18, 2007 Slide 1 Outline Purpose J Phase 1 Description/Status Demonstration Results J Future Plans/Summary/Conclusions Slide 2
More informationIntegration of Topographic Engineering Skills and Tools
Integration of Topographic Engineering Skills and Tools Providing Assured Mobility With C2 Systems By Mr. Ken Bergman Officer career-level topographic engineering instruction at the Engineer School incorporates
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Any Mission, Anywhere UNCLASSIFIED
Presentation Outline Company Intelligence Support Team (CoIST) Battalion Level CoIST Training Programme Tactical Gaming and Simulations In Support of Battalion Level CoIST Training Results of Battalion
More informationIntelligence Support for Military Operations Using
Intelligence Support for Military Operations Using the ArcGIS Platform April 2016 Copyright 2016 Esri All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The information contained in this document
More informationRepresentability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM
12th ICCRTS Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM Brian Ulicny a, Christopher J. Matheus a, Gerald Powell b Robert Dionne a and Mieczyslaw M. Kokar a,c a VIStology, Inc., 5 Mountainview Drive,
More informationAn Approach to Achieving Digital Interoperability for the DoD: A discussion of the Joint Staff J6 Coordinated Implementation Methodology
An Approach to Achieving Digital Interoperability for the DoD: A discussion of the Joint Staff J6 Coordinated Implementation Methodology Marsha Mullins, JS J6 DDC5I Joint Fires Division marsha.d.mullins4.civ@mail.mil
More informationA Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) Brigadier General Marc Rogers Director, Standing Joint Force Headquarters United States Joint Forces Command 1 Overview History The Joint Command
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
More information150-MC-0002 Validate the Intelligence Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved
Report Date: 09 Jun 2017 150-MC-0002 Validate the Intelligence Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution
More informationJoint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System
(24 APRIL 2006) Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System MIDS International Review Board JTRS Moving Forward JPEO JTRS 5 May 2006 Mr. Howard Pace Deputy JPEO JTRS 619-524-4498 Howard.Pace@navy.mil
More informationJOINT STAFF FY 2005 Budget Estimates Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification : February 2004 RDT&E, Defense Wide, Joint Staff 0400 / BA7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE: 194 PE: 0902298J Management
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 174.037 11.276 8.610 1.971-1.971
More informationCOE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force
COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES Generating Force COE Enables Increased Capability Agility Reduced Life Cycle Costs Flexible Standards-based Infrastructure Enhanced Cyber Protection Command Post Data
More informationNet-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Army Joint STARS (TIARA) 5316 25676 17898 17713 12833 14372 11527 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Justification: The
More informationDefense Solutions: Tactical Operations Centers. Derek Foll Lyle Wright
Defense Solutions: Tactical Operations Centers Derek Foll Lyle Wright Overview of Defense Solutions Esri solutions for Defense customers Over 50 maps, apps, and tools - Configurable and extensible Analysis
More informationCommon to all Engineer Senior Leader Courses
Common to all Engineer Senior Leader Courses Army Physical Fitness Test / Height and Weight Write a paper (APA format) Write a memorandum Physical Readiness Training and Physical Readiness Training Plan
More informationTransforming Intelligence for 21st Century Missions ESRI UC 2015
Transforming Intelligence for 21st Century Missions ESRI UC 2015 Mr John Teufert JISR SL/Geospatial Services Branch Head Directorate of Application Services (DAS) NATO UNCLASSIFIED Agenda Introduction
More informationJC3IEDM - Annex J - IPT3 V3.1.4 ANNEX J. REFERENCES. NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, AAP-6(2008), NATO Military
ANNEX J. REFERENCES AAP-6 (V) 1998 AAP-6 (2008) AC/322-D(2004)0021 AC/322-D(2004)0022 AC/322(SC/4)WP/054- REV1 (INV) 15 Dec 2003 AC/322(SC/4)WP/054- REV1 (INV) 15 Dec 2003 ACCS 1995a ACCS 1995b ACE Directive
More informationRapid Force Structure Analysis
Rapid Force Structure Analysis Capability Effectiveness Tool October 22, 2008 1 David Blancett Mgr, Systems Analysis & Simulation Kurt Dittmer Dir, Advanced CONOPS Northrop Grumman Corporation Overview
More informationA Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization
A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization Colonel (Retired) Randy G. Alward Consulting and Audit Canada, Information Security 112 Kent St, Tower B Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5 CANADA 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More information