From To Employer Position Held

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "From To Employer Position Held"

Transcription

1 PIERRE THIVEND SENIOR SYSTEM ENGINEER (ECSA Professional Engineer, Reg ) EDUCATION 1976 MSc in Aeronautical and Space Engineering from Ecole Nationale Supérieure de L Aéronautique et de l Espace (ENSAE SUP AERO with special interest in Avionics and Radar. ENSAE is the leading French engineering school in the field of Aeronautical and Space Engineering Advanced Course in Systems Engineering Management from ENSAE SUP AERO. OTHER INTERESTS o o o Glider Pilot Private Pilot, Instrument Rating 1000 flight hours CAREER SUMMARY From To Employer Position Held 08/ /1985 Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet Aviation Avionics and Weapon Systems Integration Centre Brétigny Flight Test Centre - France Schlumberger Well Services 05/ / Austin Engineering Centre, Austin, Texas - USA 07/ /1986 Schlumberger - Sentry Test Systems San Jose, California - USA Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet Aviation 11/ / Logistic Support Centre (DSE) in Velizy, France Sagena Manufacturing, part of the ATE group 03/ /1988 Midrand, South Africa Sagena Manufacturing, part of the ATE group 01/ /1990 Midrand, South Africa 08/ /1993 Aéronautique et Systèmes, part of the ATE group Evry, France Advanced Technologies and Engineering 04/ /1996 Midrand South Africa Advanced Technologies and Engineering 01/ /1998 Midrand South Africa Advanced Technologies and Engineering 04/ /2000 Midrand South Africa 06/ /2011 ATE International Advanced Technologies and Engineering then Paramount Advanced Technologies 10/2011 Date Midrand South Africa Avionics Integration Engineer Section Manager, System Test System Test Engineer Section Manager, Maintenance Training Simulators System Engineer Consultant at ATLAS Aviation Program Manager, ROOIVALK Integration Benches Development System Engineer - Consultant System Engineer, Pilatus Trainer Program Integration Manager, Mirage F1 Avionics Upgrade Division Manager, Integration and Test Senior System Engineer Senior System Engineer

2 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Current: Senior System Engineer at Paramount Advanced Technologies (previously Advanced Technologies and Engineerin), reporting to the Engineering Director. I am currently responsible for: Integration. testing and qualification of the Main Sighting Systems for the Mi24 and EC635 helicopters. Integration, testing and qualification of the BARIER and INGWE Anti-Tank missile systems on the Mi24 and EC635 helicopters Integration, testing and qualification of the Laser Designator on the EC635. In 2007, ATE was contracted to provide a new avionics and weapons package for the MIL Mi-24 attack helicopters for a foreign customer. In January 2009, ATE was contracted by EUROCOPTER (now AIRBUS HELICOPTERS) to develop the Stand Alone Weapons System (SAWS) upgrade package for the EC635 light helicopter. Both programs have been running concurrently, and are currently in the final qualification phase, with ongoing delivery of production kits and modification of production helicopters. In addition, a refurbish and requalification of the INGWE missile system is currently ongoing on the Algerian Mi24 fleet. As Senior System Engineer in charge of the development, integration and qualification of the Main Sight Systems and Laser Guided Weapons, I have been responsible for: Technical development, integration and qualification of the new Main Sighting Systems Integration and qualification of the BARIER and INGWE anti-tank missile Integration of the Laser Designator weapons guidance system on the EC635 helicopter Providing customer support to the Algerian Air Force for the refurbish / upgrade of their existing Mi24, and for the requalification of the INGWE missile after the refurbish. Contract Negotiations: Part of the ATE team responsible for the contract negotiation with EUROCOPTER for the EC635 SAWS upgrade. Participating in the selection of, and contractual negotiations with, the main subcontractors for the development and procurement of Main Sight and Guided Weapons Systems equipment. System Design and Specification: Preparing the system level and component level specifications, and software functional requirement specifications for the laser guided weapons for the Mi-24 and the EC635 helicopters: System Safety: Preparing the safety justification of the laser guided weapons for both programs and presenting the results to PAT Safety Review Board for the Safety of Flight clearance of the laser guided weapon systems. As Laser Safety Officer for PAT, I am also responsible for Paramount Laser Safety Procedure to comply with Occupational Health and Safety and international guidelines for the safe use of hazardous laser systems. System Integration: Supervising the integration of the laser guided weapons with the main sight and with the other helicopter systems at the Avionics Integration Bench (AIB), and on the helicopters. Flight Testing: Preparing Flight Test Requirements, providing engineering support during flight test execution and analysing flight test results for the Main Sight and for the Laser Guided Weapons on the Mi-24 and EC635 helicopters. February 2006 to November 2007: Employed by ATE International as Senior System Engineer and Technical Coordinator, reporting initially to ATE International Vice- President Fixed Wing Aircraft (Mr Alain Alexandre) and then to the Program Manager (Mr Dirk De Villiers) In March 2006 ATE was contracted by a foreign customer for the definition of an upgrade package for the C130 transport aircraft. The contract also included an audit of the existing customer industrial capabilities. I was initially part of the marketing team, responsible for the technical aspects of the contract, and then I was appointed as Senior System Engineer

3 and Technical Coordinator for this program. This program involved spending approximately 7 month in the customer country. Prepare the contract Technical Proposal, Technical Development Plan and Statement of Work. Negotiate the contract with the customer as part of ATE marketing team. Set-up and manage ATE on-site office in the customer country. Coordinate and manage the engineering teams in ATE and in the customer country. Prepare and maintain the System Development Specifications for the upgrade. Prepare budgetary estimates and technical development plans with ATE engineering specialists and with the customer. Prepare the Qualification / Certification strategy. Manage technical reviews with the customer and the end user. Audit existing customer capabilities with ATE specialists. Prepare audit report and present audit results to the customer. Prepare detailed facilities requirements and budgetary estimates for the execution of the program by the customer. September 2005 to June 2006: Employed by ATE International as Senior System Engineer, reporting to ATE International Vice-President (Mr. André Lacroix). The VULTURE is an Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) developed by ATE for the South African Army. The digital autopilot developed by ATE includes a fully automatic landing mode which flies the UAV into a recovery net. The accuracy of the autopilot during recovery was unacceptable, compromising the mission and delaying the delivery of the entire system. I was appointed to lead the corrective action team responsible for the modification of the autopilot. After modification, the system was successfully demonstrated to the South African Army and ARMSCOR in February The evaluation included 20 successful automatic recoveries witnessed by the customer. During the same period, I was also responsible for investigating a Total Energy Control Autopilot for the UAVs. Technical management of the team Review the autopilot design, and analyse flight test and simulation results to understand the causes of the problem. Update the UAV simulation models (aerodynamic, engine and autopilot) to represent more accurately the aircraft dynamic. Tune the simulation models to match data recorded during flight tests, and identify the main causes of disturbances during final approach. Modify the autopilot design to improve the accuracy and robustness during the final approach phase, and validate the changes by simulation and hardware in the loop stimulation at the UAV integration bench. Specify flight tests requirements to perform simulated approach trajectories. Analyse tests results to verify the autopilot performances under real flight conditions and clear the system for customer demonstration. March 2003 to March 2005: Employed by ATE International as Senior System Engineer, reporting to ATE International Vice-President (Mr. André Lacroix). ATE was contracted by the Algerian Army for an upgrade of the BMP1 Infantry Fighting Vehicle and T72 Main Battle Tank. The BMP1 upgrade included full day/night fighting capabilities and anti-tank capability with INGWE missile. The T72 upgrade included full day/night fighting capabilities, and digital fire control system. ATE partnered with IST (now BAE Land Systems) for this development. A joint development team was set up in RSA with representative of the Algerian Army, IST and ATE to design the upgrades. After initial development and testing in RSA, the modifications were implemented on the Algerian Army BMP and T72 demonstrators and handed over to the customer for operational evaluation. I was appointed System Engineer in charge of both upgrades, in RSA and in Algeria. This program involved spending approximately 4 month in Algeria to supervise the modification of the prototypes, train the customer crews and provide support during the operational evaluations at the firing ranges. Unfortunately ATE was not contracted for production. Technical management of the joint engineering team Define, review and approve system requirements and detailed components specifications, based on the inputs provided by the customers and by the SANDF. Coordinate with IST the modification of both prototype vehicles in South Africa

4 Integrate and test the prototype in South-Africa, including live firing of the INGWE missile and T72 main gun. Coordinate with IST the modification of the BMP and T72 demonstrators at the Base Centrale Logistique in Algeria, using the customer s workforce and facilities. Train the customer s personnel and perform the operational evaluation of the upgraded vehicles with the customer. Analyse test results and provide inputs to the customer for the operational evaluation report. June 2000 to March 2003: Employed by ATE International as Senior Engineer, reporting to the Vice-President Helicopters (Mr André Lacroix) The INGWE Anti-Tank missile developed by KENTRON (now DENEL DYNAMICS) was selected as the main weapon for the Algerian Mi-24 upgrade. During initial flight tests in RSA, the missile performance was unacceptable, with a hit probability less than 20%, causing serious delays in the delivery of the weapon system, and putting the whole contract at risk. I was put in charge of the joint ATE / KENTRON / KREON corrective action team. We identified and corrected several hardware and software issues in the missile guidance unit, in the missile position measurement system and in the missile autopilot. After implementation of these corrections, the missile achieved a hit probability greater than 85%. More than 2700 production missiles have subsequently been delivered to this customer. This program involved spending approximately 9 month in Algeria. Technical management of the joint team. Analyse existing test results (flight video, flight test data and missile data logger) with KENTRON specialists to identify the problems affecting the missile performances. Update the missile flight simulation model developed by KENTRON, to simulate more accurately the missile launch and capture phase on the MI-24 helicopter. Analyse simulations results and optimise the autopilot capture and guidance laws for the helicopter: o Take into account the helicopter flight dynamics and rotor aerodynamic disturbances o Improve the missile stability at high speed, and make the autopilot more tolerant to disturbances of the guidance beam o Improve the missile launch envelope Modify the guidance system in the main sight to minimise disturbances during missile capture and improve position measurement accuracy. Organise ground and flight tests in RSA and in Algeria, and analyse the results with KENTRON to validate the modifications. Organise the missile evaluation and final customer acceptance in the customer country: The acceptance included firing two live missiles on each production helicopter. May 1999 to March 2003: Employed by Advanced Technologies and Engineering, as Integration and Test Manager for the Mi24 upgrade program, reporting to ATE Managing Director (Mr Carel De Beer), then to ATE International Vice-President Helicopters (Mr André Lacroix). In 1998 ATE was contracted by the Algerian Air Force to deliver Mi-24 attack helicopters fitted with modern avionics and weapons package providing night fighting and long range anti-tank capabilities. The system was developed and qualified in South Africa, with initial flight tests performed on ATE prototype Mi24. The retrofit of the fleet was performed by a joint ATE / Customer team in the Algerian Air Force upgrade facility. 48 Mi-24 helicopters were modified and delivered. This task involved spending approximately 6 month in Algeria. Technical management of the integration team locally and overseas. Identify the electrical interfaces on the prototype helicopter to interface ATE equipment with existing Russian systems. Integrate and test the new avionics and weapon system. Provide support to the flight test team during flights tests of the prototype helicopter in RSA. Organise integration support for the production line in Algeria, prepare production test procedures and test equipment. Install the avionics upgrade kits on the production helicopter, and perform production acceptance (each production helicopter acceptance required a team of 3 integration specialist for 2 weeks on site). Prepare flight acceptance procedures and train customer flight crew for the execution of the production acceptance flights. Manage flight line and organise production helicopter acceptance with the customer. Each helicopter acceptance required 3 successful acceptance flights, including live weapons firing tests on each helicopter.

5 April 1998 to June 2000: Employed by Advanced Technologies and Engineering as Manager, Integration and Test Division, reporting to ATE Managing Director (Mr Carel De Beer). The Integration and Test Division was providing integration and test services to the Fixed Wing, Helicopter and UAV divisions in ATE. The main purpose was to establish common integration standards, methodology and tools across the various programs in ATE, as part of ATE ISO 9001 quality accreditation by BVQI. Manage avionics integration engineers and engineering technicians Plan and control the budget for the division Specify avionics integration facilities and personnel requirements Prepare Integration Operational Procedure for ATE Quality Assurance Manual. Review the procedure with ATE QA and BVQI Support ATE QA during the company audit by BVQI in order to achieve ISO 9001 quality accreditation. January 1996 to April 1998: Employed by Advanced Technologies and Engineering as System Integration Manager in charge of the Mirage F1 Avionics Upgrade program, reporting to ATE Program Manager (Alain Alexandre). In 1996 ATE was sub-contracted by THALES for a Radar, Navigation and Weapon System upgrade for 55 Mirage F1C fighter aircraft for the Spanish Air Force. ATE was responsible for the development, testing and qualification of the upgrade package, and the acceptance of the upgrade kits on the production aircraft. System integration was done by ATE in South Africa, flight tests were performed by SABCA in Belgium, and CASA was responsible for the production aircraft upgrade in Spain, using upgrade kits delivered by ATE. I was appointed Avionics Integration Manager, with a team of 2 engineers and 2 technicians. Train and manage the integration team in RSA, Belgium and Spain during the development and production phase of the program. Specify requirements for the integration facilities. Prepare the Prime Item Development Specifications for the Avionics Integration Benches (AIB). Manage the AIB development with the subcontractors and with other ATE departments: Two integration benches were produced: one for system integration in South Africa, the second to support the prototype flight tests and the aircraft production line in Spain. Manage day to day integration activities at the AIB. Prepare and validate the System Acceptance Test Procedures for the prototype and for the production systems. Manage system configuration under test at the AIB and on the prototype aircraft. Manage and resolve non-conformance reports. Manage the integration of the prototype avionics equipment before delivery to flight test. Test and validate mission software. Integrate the ballistic weapons and demonstrate ballistic accuracy by real time simulation tests at the AIB: Set up flight test support bench at SABCA. Install the system on the prototype aircraft, and perform with SABCA the ground acceptance tests for each flight test configuration. Provide support to flight test to analyse flight test data and rectify problems identified during flight tests. Manage production acceptance test of each upgrade kit before delivery. March 1993 to January 1996: Employed by Advanced Technologies and Engineering as Avionics System Engineer for the PILATUS PC7 ASTRA Trainer Aircraft program, reporting to ATE Program Manager (Carel De Beer). In March 1993 ATE was sub-contracted by PILATUS AIRCRAFT Ltd. for the development of an integrated avionic suite for the South African Air Force PC7 trainer Aircraft. The system featured dual glass cockpit with integrated HMI, radio and radio-navigation managed by ATE mission computer. ATE was contracted for the development, qualification and delivery of 60 production sets plus spares. The first production set was delivered 18 month after placement of contract, and the total contract was completed in 48 month. I was appointed Avionics System Engineer for this program. Prepare and maintain the System Development Specifications, and ensure requirement traceability and compliance during development. Liaise with the PILATUS, the Air Force, and ARMSCOR on all technical matters.

6 Coordinate system evaluation with the customer, analyse and specify new requirements. Manage subcontractors and ATE in house development team on all technical aspects. Review and accept equipment specifications, monitor qualification results, manage non-conformances and check implementation of changes. Manage system integration at the Avionics Integration Bench, identify problems and validate design changes. Plan and execute system acceptance at the bench. Install the system on the prototype aircraft at PILATUS facility in Switzerland, and perform the ground acceptance tests with PILATUS team. Provide support to PILATUS during flight tests in Switzerland. Prepare and coordinate flight test of the system in RSA with the South African Air Force Flight Test Centre (TFDC), brief test crew, provide support during the tests and analyse test results. Prepare and present the IFR qualification of the Avionics System to the Air Force Certification and Qualification Board. Train ATE integration and field service engineers. January 1992 to March 1993: Employed by Aéronautique et Systèmes (part of the ATE group) as Project Manager, reporting to the Managing Director (Mr Michel Porta) In January 1992, A&S was contracted by the Paris Public Transport Company (RATP) to develop a technology demonstrator for providing real time geolocation, guidance and alarm monitoring for the public transport busses in Paris. The system used differential GPS hybridised with gyro and odometer to provide accurate localisation and guidance. It linked into the existing RATP radio communication network to report vehicle position and alarm status to RATP main control centre. I was appointed system engineer for this project. The system was successfully demonstrated in July 1992, and it was selected by RATP to be presented at the 1992 UIT Congress in Paris. Manage the project, select and procure equipment. Define the interfaces with RATP control centre. Develop the gyro/odometer acquisition interfaces, the hybridisation algorithm, and the radio management software. Set up and calibrate the differential GPS reference station. Install the system in the demonstration vehicles and perform the operational evaluation and demonstrations with RATP January 1991 to January 1992: Employed by Aéronautique et Systèmes as Consultant Engineer, reporting to the Managing Director (Mr Michel Porta) In January 1991, I was seconded to CESELSA / AISA in Madrid (Spain) as Consultant Engineer, to provide support for the preparation of an avionics upgrade proposal for the Spanish Air Force Dassault Mirage III. This contract involved spending approximately 4 month in Madrid, Spain. Review the upgrade specifications with CESELSA engineering team to identify risk area and technical solutions. Coordinate visits of ATE and A&S specialists to reviews critical aspects of the program with CESELSA: Program plan and schedule Avionics System architecture definition Performances simulation and prediction Ground Tests / Flight Tests / Qualification plan Software architecture and software development plan July 1990 to September 1991: Employed by Aéronautique et Systèmes as Project Manager, reporting to the Managing Director (Mr Michel Porta) In August 1990, Aéronautique et Systèmes was contracted by SAGEM (now part of the SAFRAN group) to modify a Mirage 2000 aircraft in order to demonstrate in flight the new gravity bomb delivery system (DFR) developed by SAGEM. The new ballistic algorithms were implemented by SAGEM in the Inertial Navigation Unit, and the modified INU was then integrated on the Mirage 2000B prototype of the French Flight Test Centre (CEV) in Bretigny. I was appointed as Project Manager in charge of the integration of the modified system at the CEV integration bench and on the prototype aircraft. The system was successfully tested in flight by the CEV in September 1991.

7 Prepare the contract Technical Proposal and Statement of Work, and participate in contractual negotiations with SAGEM and the CEV. Prepare the MMI Requirements, User Requirement and System Requirements with SAGEM and the CEV. Prepare detailed design specification for the modification of the Mirage 2000 Mission Computer software. Coding, testing and acceptance of the MC software modification With support of SAGEM and CEV team, integrate and validate the modification at the CEV integration bench and on the prototype M2000B aircraft. January 1988 to July 1990: Employed by Sagena Manufacturing Pty (part of the ATE group), as Program Manager reporting to ATE Managing Director (Jean-Marc Pizano). In December 1987 Sagena was contracted by ATLAS (Now DENEL AVIATION) for the procurement of the Avionics Integration Bench for the ROOIVALK Attack Helicopter and for the training of the Rooivalk integration team. A subsequent contract for the development of the Rooivalk Navigation Integration Bench was awarded by KENTRON (Now DENEL DYNAMICS) early The total amount for these contract was approximately 3.5M$. Both integration benches were delivered by ATE at the beginning of The bench was actively used to support the ROOIVALK helicopter program for more than 10 years. Manage program budget and schedule Recruit, train and manage the project team in ATE Report to the customers (ATLAS and KENTRON) Prepare/review/approve the detailed development specifications for the AIB and associated test equipment Manage subcontractors in RSA and in France, perform design reviews and major component acceptance Assemble, test and commission the Integration Benches in ATLAS and KENTRON Train ATLAS integration team, and provide engineering support during initial system integration. March 1987 to January 1988: Employed by Sagena Manufacturing Pty (Part of ATE Group) as System Integration Specialist, seconded to ATLAS for the definition of the Avionics Integration Facility for the ROOIVALK Attack Helicopter. ATE was contracted by ATLAS for the definition of the Avionics Integration Facilities for the ROOIVALK Attack Helicopter. As consultant engineer seconded to ATLAS, my responsibilities included: Specify personnel and facility requirements for the ROOIVALK Avionics Integration Bench Specify the Avionics Integration Bench and associated integration tools and support equipment. Specify the Flexible Acquisition and Stimulation Tool (FAST) used to test the avionics system at the AIB. Specify the data interface requirements between the Integration Facility and the Flight Test Facility. Participate in contractual negotiations with ATLAS for the procurement of the AIB and FAST systems November 1986 to March 1987: Employed by Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet Aviation ( as manager of the Maintenance Training Simulator Section, at the Logistic Support Centre (DSE) in Velizy (France), in charge of a team of 7 engineers and technicians. The Maintenance Training Simulator Section was responsible for procurement and support of documentation, tools and simulators used for training the ground crew in the O Level maintenance of the Mirage 2000 and Mirage F1 fighter. Management personnel, budget and plan work for the section Review and approves procurement specifications from subcontractors Manage sub-contractors, perform design reviews and system acceptance July 1986 to November 1986:

8 Employed by Schlumberger - Sentry Test Systems in San Jose, California as Test Engineer, reporting to the manager of the production test division. Sentry was producing a new range of high speed tester for the microprocessor industry. Typically each tester featured 128 to 256 test heads operating at 50MHz. The production rate was 1 2 units per week, and each unit sold between 0.5M$ and 1.5M$. Deliveries were consistently delayed sometimes by several weeks due to problems during the final Acceptance Test. This was creating a serious cash flow problem for the company. I was responsible for providing engineering support to the production team to identify and resolve acceptance snags, and to provide feedback to the engineering division to prevent recurring problems. May 1985 to July 1986: Employed by Schlumberger Well Services at the Austin Engineering Centre, Texas as Section Manager, System Test, reporting to the Production Manager (Mr Jean-Paul Vernes) Austin Engineering Centre was responsible for the development and production of the new CSU2000 data acquisition and data analysis system developed by the Austin Engineering Centre for oil well logging. The CSU was a real time data acquisition system integrating mini computers, array processor and graphic processor connected through an Ethernet network. With a team of 3 technicians, I was in charge of planning and execution of the prototype and production systems acceptance: Establish the section and recruit technical staff Prepare the budget and procurement plan Set-up the integration bench and dedicated simulation / monitoring tools, and prepare integration and acceptance test procedures. Set-up the configuration management database Perform production and acceptance tests of the first engineering prototypes, and coordinate with engineering for problems investigation August 1982 to April 1985: Employed by Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet Aviation at the Avionics and Weapon Systems Integration Centre (SNA) in Brétigny (France) as Project Engineer reporting to the Integration Manager (Jean-Louis Cuvillier) Design of the Avionics Integration Benches for the export versions of the Mirage 2000 and for the RAFALE A experimental prototype, including the specific requirements for real time stimulation and monitoring. Development of dedicated simulation/monitoring interfaces used for the integration of complex components: o Airborne Radar (TH-CSF RDI and RDM) o MATRA S530 and 550 guided missile o Electronic Counter Measure System o SAGEM ULISS Inertial Navigation Systems o TH-CSF ATLIS designation pod Development of the test software used to integrate the Air to Air Interception mode of the MIRAGE 2000 C: the RDM radar was stimulated in real time with recorded target data, and the guidance and firing envelope computed by the radar were compared against the outputs of a reference model. This was used to automate the ground acceptance tests of the A/A modes, and to understand flight test results. This project resulted in significant savings in test time during both ground and flight tests. August 1977 to July 1982: Employed by Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet Aviation at the Avionics and Weapon Systems Integration Centre (SNA) in Brétigny as Trainee Integration Engineer, then System Integration Engineer reporting to the Integration Manager (Jean- Louis Cuvillier)

9 Paert of team of two engineers and two technicians, in charge of the Mirage 2000DA Avionics Integration Bench (AIB). The AIB is dedicated to the ground validation of the Navigation, Communication, Radar, Weapons and ECM subsystems before flight tests on the prototype aircraft. We were responsible for: Design and commission the Avionics Integration Bench (AIB) for the Mirage 2000DA program. Specify and validate simulation and test tools used at the AIB, including the real-time simulation system used for hardware in the loop testing of avionics and weapons. Integrate and accept prototype avionics and weapon systems configurations at the AIB: Manage avionics system configuration for the prototype aircraft during flight tests. Providing support to flight test and engineering to analyse flight test results and identify problems. Manage and resolve non compliances Provide support to the production team to design the Production Test Bench and prepare the Production Acceptance Test Procedure.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Army Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #167 To Program Element - 52.811 20.733

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)

AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Preparation (MTPS) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 PE NUMBER: 27133F PE TITLE: F-16 SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 27 7 Operational System Development 27133F F-16 SQUADRONS ($ in Millions) 2671 Total Program Element (PE)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 11.801 10.862

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED : February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 2.885

More information

PROFILE COMBAT SYSTEMS NAVAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION

PROFILE COMBAT SYSTEMS NAVAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION PROFILE COMBAT SYSTEMS NAVAL SYSTEMS AEROSPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LEADERS IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY INNOVATION LEADERS IN DEFENCE & SECURITY INNOVATION 2 A GLOBAL BUSINESS Central Asia Europe South East

More information

ISR Full Crew Mission Simulator. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training

ISR Full Crew Mission Simulator. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 57.205 93.145

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 22.63 3.676 32.789-32.789 35.932

More information

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense. This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/14/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-24622, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 5001-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0401132F PE TITLE: C-130J PROGRAM Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0401132F C-130J PROGRAM Cost ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 3.377

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT. THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS SPS-TA INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT www.thales-airbornesystems.com THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC WARFARE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #232

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #232 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) # FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3 Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3 30 May 2001 R. John Bernard Angela M. Alban United Defense, L.P. Orlando, Florida Report Documentation Page Report Date 29May2001 Report

More information

Air Defense System Solutions.

Air Defense System Solutions. Air Defense System Solutions www.aselsan.com.tr ADSS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Effective air defense is based on integration and coordinated use of airborne and/or ground

More information

Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs

Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs Ralph D. Crosby, Jr. CEO North America North America Investor Forum New York 7 th October 2003 1 EADS Accessing the U.S. Aerospace and Defense Market Executing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System

AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System AMPS Where Innovation Meets Performance The Threat Military aircraft, VIP aircraft and commercial airliners are all exposed to the growing threat of Surface to

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0604633A ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 11676 14167 7578 Continuing Continuing

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 United States Special Operations Command Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Development

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #98 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 R1 Program

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Exhibit R-2 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 to Program Element (PE) 72521 13259 61946 71307 85450 99440

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 174.037 11.276 8.610 1.971-1.971

More information

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems 134 Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems 135 Igor KOROTCHENKO Editor-in-Chief of the National Defense magazine The main task handled by the

More information

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit  or call Electronic Systems Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook Forecast International projects that the

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014

More information

Own the fight forward, build Airmen in a lethal and relevant force, and foster a thriving Air Commando family

Own the fight forward, build Airmen in a lethal and relevant force, and foster a thriving Air Commando family U.S. Air Force Fact Sheet 27TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS WING Cannon Air Force Base, home of the 27th Special Operations Wing, lies in the high plains of eastern New Mexico, near the Texas Panhandle. The base

More information

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17 NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17 Distribution Statement A Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. File: NAVAIR Brief 1 Weapons Systems Integration and

More information

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles Chapter 5 GUIDED MISSILES Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles 5.1 INTRODUCTION Guided missiles have been in the forefront of modern warfare since

More information

WARFIGHTER FOCUSED. Training Systems

WARFIGHTER FOCUSED. Training Systems WARFIGHTER FOCUSED Training Systems Advanced Training Systems for the Warfighter Kratos exhibits the knowledge and skills to put together a lifecycle training program to support your specific training

More information

Fire Control Systems.

Fire Control Systems. Fire Control Systems www.aselsan.com.tr ARTILLERY FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS ASELSAN Fire Control Systems developed for Self Propelled/Towed Howitzers, Mortars and Multiple Launch Rocket

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #227 To Program

More information

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II Army ACAT ID Program Total Number of BATs: (3,487 BAT + 8,478 P3I BAT) Total Number of Missiles: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Full-rate

More information

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World Any Mission, Any Time... the F-16 Defines Multirole The enemies of world peace are changing. The threats are smaller,

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 214 Army DATE: April 213 24: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 212 FY 213 # PE 64746A:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 13 P-1 Line #25

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 13 P-1 Line #25 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2031A: Aircraft Procurement, Army / BA 02: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 10: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0207133F PE TITLE: F-16 SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207133F F-16 SQUADRONS Cost ($ in Millions)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 109.887 133.105 148.297-148.297

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line Item #116 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1506N: Aircraft Procurement, Navy / BA 05: Modification of Aircraft / BSA 1: Modification of Aircraft ID Code (A=Service Ready,

More information

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 50 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2012 Ms.

More information

Specifications for the procurement of a new combat aircraft (NKF) and of a new ground-based air defence system (Bodluv) [German version is authentic]

Specifications for the procurement of a new combat aircraft (NKF) and of a new ground-based air defence system (Bodluv) [German version is authentic] Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sports DDPS 23 March 2018 Specifications for the procurement of a new combat aircraft (NKF) and of a new ground-based air defence system (Bodluv) [German

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Exhibit P-40, Budget Item Justification Sheet: PB 2014 United States Special Operations Command Date: April 2013 Operations Command / BSA 1: Aviation Programs ID Code (A=Service Ready, B=Not Service Ready)

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #47

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #47 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($

More information

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Countering Smart and Adaptive Threats Military pilots and aircrews must be prepared to

More information

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost

More information

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-6 0604759N Major T & E Investment Prior Total COST ($

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 1810N: Other Procurement, Navy / BA 04: Ordnance Support Equipment / BSA 3: Ship Missile Systems Equipment ID Code (A=Service

More information

The Verification for Mission Planning System

The Verification for Mission Planning System 2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications (AITA 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-389-2 The Verification for Mission Planning System Lin ZHANG *, Wei-Ming CHENG and Hua-yun

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE

JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE Army ACAT ID Program Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average CLU Cost (TY$): Average Missile Cost (TY$): Full-rate production: 4,348 CLUs 28,453 missiles $3618M

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 752.328 704.475 722.071-722.071 701.000 702.979 716.873 725.979

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: KC-10S. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: KC-10S. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 Air Force Page 1 of 12 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element

More information

We provide innovative solutions that protect and save lives.

We provide innovative solutions that protect and save lives. 1 We provide innovative solutions that protect and save lives. Defense Commercial Aviation Homeland Security Medical Instrumentation Sustainment & Support 2 Our Corporate Snapshot Elbit Systems of America

More information

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Complete Program Element - 130.376 166.297 132.795 0.000

More information

Department of Defense

Department of Defense 1Gp o... *.'...... OFFICE O THE N CTONT GNR...%. :........ -.,.. -...,...,...;...*.:..>*.. o.:..... AUDITS OF THE AIRFCEN AVIGATION SYSEMEA FUNCTIONAL AND PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION TIME AND RANGING GLOBAL

More information

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)

Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 49 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2011 Mr.

More information

Briefing for Industry

Briefing for Industry Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution

More information

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.350 DNS-3/NAVAIR OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.350 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj:

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 P-1 Line #50

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 P-1 Line #50 Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force Date: February 2016 3010F: Aircraft Procurement, Air Force / BA 05: Modification of Inservice Aircraft / BSA 5: Other Aircraft ID Code (A=Service

More information

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense. This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 000 and available online at https:federalregister.govd0-66, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 500-06 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0207581F PE TITLE: JOINT STARS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207581F JOINT STARS Cost ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total Program Element 0.912 2.292 2.095-2.095 3.633 4.555 - - Continuing Continuing 671325: HH-60G

More information

History of Fire Control and the Application of Implementing Technologies Victor Galgano & Ralph Tillinghast May 2012

History of Fire Control and the Application of Implementing Technologies Victor Galgano & Ralph Tillinghast May 2012 U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command History of Fire Control and the Application of Implementing Technologies Victor Galgano & Ralph Tillinghast May 2012 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved

More information

Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) Version 1.0

Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) Version 1.0 Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) 1. INTRODUCTION Version 1.0 1.1 Scope This Technical Supplement describes the Government s need for a capability

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 19.165 18.599 22.654-22.654 24.342 24.422 24.571 25.715 Continuing

More information

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc

More information

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 6454N: Air Control FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Complete Program Element 6.373 5.665

More information

GAO ELECTRONIC WARFARE. The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System. Report to the Secretary of Defense

GAO ELECTRONIC WARFARE. The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System. Report to the Secretary of Defense GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Secretary of Defense April 2001 ELECTRONIC WARFARE The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System GAO-01-448 Contents

More information

APACHE AVIATION COMBAT AIR TRAINING SUPPORT

APACHE AVIATION COMBAT AIR TRAINING SUPPORT COMBAT AIR TRAINING SUPPORT Nowadays, armed forces are facing a large reduction in the number of combat aircrafts and increased operating cost of sophisticated equipments. Planners need to focus their

More information

BMDO RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

BMDO RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY2000 Actual FY 2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 to Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) 81614 540998 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Theater High Altitude

More information

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification PE NUMBER: 0101113F PE TITLE: B-52 SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS ($ in Millions) FY

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #211

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #211 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 35.208 38.447

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in

More information

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASE BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. SENATE STATEMENT BY J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE

More information

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #142 To Program Element - 2.292

More information

GMV PRESENTATION. A GMV no Programa do Soldado do Futuro. José Neves Seminário 17/02/2016

GMV PRESENTATION. A GMV no Programa do Soldado do Futuro. José Neves Seminário 17/02/2016 GMV PRESENTATION A GMV no Programa do Soldado do Futuro José Neves Seminário AFCEA @IDN 17/02/2016 CONTENTS WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO HOW WE ARE IN THE FUTURE SOLDIER PROGRAMME IoT IN DEFENCE WHO WHO WE ARE

More information

Fire Support Systems.

Fire Support Systems. Fire Support Systems www.aselsan.com.tr AFSAS FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEMS ASELSAN Fire Support System (AFSAS) is a system of systems which provides the automation of planning and execution

More information