Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm

Transcription

1 Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA ITEM AGENCY I. CALL TO ORDER Probation A. Roll Call B. Additions or Corrections to Agenda II. PUBLIC COMMENT Pursuant to the Brown Act, each public agency must provide the public with an opportunity to speak on any matter within the subject matter of the jurisdiction of the agency and which is not on the agency's agenda for that meeting. Comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes per speaker. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approve Regular Meeting Minutes for November 13, 2017 Attachment: Minutes November 13, 2017 (Action Item) B. Approve the Revised CCP meeting schedule for 2018 Attachment: Revised CCP Meeting Schedule 2018 (Action Item) Approve the Revised CCP meeting schedule for 2018 replacing the November 12 th meeting with November 28 th. C. Receive the AB 109 Criminal Justice Realignment Service Delivery Probation Report FY Attachment: (No Action) D. Receive the Public Safety Realignment Annual Report for FY Probation Attachment: Public Safety Realignment Annual Report for FY (No Action) E. Receive Statistical Data Report Probation Attachment: Monterey County CCP Quarterly Statistical Report: October 1, 2017 December 31, 2017 (No Action)

2 IV. SCHEDULED ITEMS: A. Receive quarterly fiscal update on AB 109 Funding and Budget Probation Attachment: Summary of Total Funding and Annual Expenditures (No Action) B. Approve FY Public Safety Realignment Budget Probation a. Approve the baseline Budget for FY including Recommended Reallocations b. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $294,664 by Sheriff s Office c. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $81,560 by the Public Defender d. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $204,006 by the Probation Department for housing services e. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $144,766 by the Superior Court, sponsored by Probation Attachment: Staff Report (Action Item) V. ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT: The next CCP meeting will be held on February 22, 2018 at 3:30 pm at the Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers, 168 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA Brown Act information: If requested, the agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC Sec ), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. A person with a disability who requires a special modification or accommodation in order to participate in the public meeting should contact the Monterey County Probation Department at (831) as soon as possible, and at a minimum 24 hours in advance of any meeting.

3 Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, November 13, :30 p.m. III. A Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 W. Alisal St. Salinas, CA I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Marcia Parsons at 3:30 p.m. A. Roll Call Staff: Anne Brereton, County Counsel CCP Members Present: Marcia Parsons (Chair), Stephen Bernal, Susan Chapman, Ana Galvez (Representing Pamela Patterson), Yvette Irving (Representing Nancy Kotowski), Robert Masterson, Robin McCrae, Elliott Robinson, Aimee Miller, Chris Ruhl (Representing The Honorable Mark E. Hood), Korey Woo (Representing Chris Donnely). CCP Members Absent: Dean Flippo, Manuel Gonzalez. B. Additions or Corrections to Agenda One of the attachments for Scheduled Item IV.A titled FY CCP Approved Budget with FY Actual Expenditures was accidentally omitted in the agenda packet and was distributed at the meeting. II. Public Comment There were no public comments. III. Consent Calendar A. Approve Regular Meeting Minutes of August 14, 2017 B. Receive Statistical Data Report Program Manager II Robin Rodriguez presented the quarterly AB 109 Statistical Report for July 1, 2017 through September 30, A motion was made by Susan Chapman, seconded by Elliott Robinson, to approve the Consent Calendar. Vote: Passed 6:0 (Absent: Dean Flippo) IV. Scheduled Matters A. Receive a quarterly fiscal update on AB 109 Funding and Budget Finance Manager (FM) Dawn Soza presented a summary of the Total Funding and Annual Expenditure report which reflected revenue, budgeted funds and actual expenditures through Fiscal Year Board Comments: There were no board comments. Public Comment: There were no public comments. 1

4 B. Approve additional Budget Augmentation Request by the Sheriff s Office for FY Undersheriff John Mineau discussed the need for the one-time augmentation request in the amount of $1,081,378 for increased health care cost. Board Comments: Chris Ruhl inquired if the augmentation would be required in the future. Robin McCrae supports the request if it improved the medical care of inmates. Susan Chapman indicated that the CCP funds was a good approach to fund inmate health care, as it was a critical need. Public Comment: There were no public comments. A motion was made by Elliott Robinson, seconded by Robert Masterson, to approve the additional Budget Augmentation Request in the amount of $1,081,378 by the Sheriff s Office for FY Vote: Passed 5:0 (Abstain: Stephen Bernal, Absent: Dean Flippo) C. Approve the FY Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) survey due to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) by December 15, 2017 Director Nancy Hatton presented the proposed survey to the CCP members. Board Comments: There were no board comments. Public Comment: There were no public comments. A motion was made by Robert Masterson, seconded by Susan Chapman to approve the FY Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) survey due to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) by December 15, Vote: Passed 6:0 (Absent: Dean Flippo) D. Approve the CCP meeting schedule for 2018 A motion was made by Chris Ruhl, seconded by Stephen Bernal, to approve the CCP meeting schedule for Vote: Passed 6:0 (Absent: Dean Flippo) Announcements: Chief Parsons recommended that the CCP meeting scheduled for December 11, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. at the Board of Supervisors Chambers be cancelled. A motion was made by Elliott Robinson, seconded by Susan Chapman, to cancel the December 11, 2017 CCP meeting. Vote: Passed 6:0 (Absent: Dean Flippo) Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Trisha Hidalgo, Senior Secretary Monterey County Probation Department 2

5 III. B Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Meeting Schedule for the Calendar Year 2018 Revised 2/12/18 Meeting Date Time Location February 12, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers February 22, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers May 14, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers August 13, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers November 28, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers November 12, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers December 10, :30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers Special CCP meetings may be scheduled as needed.

6 III. C FISCAL YEAR MONTEREY COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JANUARY 10, 2018

7 Table of Contents Public Safety Realignment (AB109 Service Delivery. 2 AB109 Service Providers; Probation Referral Data for FY OET Kickstart 6 Turning Point Employment Program... 7 Turning Point Housing Program.. 8 Reentry Program (30 day) 9 Behavioral Health.. 10 Day Reporting Center.. 11 Rancho Cielo Terms and Definitions. 13 1

8 Public Safety Realignment (AB109) Service Delivery AB109 funding has made it possible for Monterey County to provide extensive service delivery for reentry, employment, housing, and behavioral health and substance abuse treatment. These areas of service delivery have been identified through the assessments conducted by officers for each person supervised by the probation department. When new or different needs are identified by the populations served, applications for qualified vendors and service providers are solicited through the designated County process. Other services and support are coordinated through collaborative relationships between County departments. Specifically, Social Services remains a non-funded collaborative partner to assist probationers with accessing community benefits by providing on site staff to help with eligibility related questions and applications. The majority of all AB109 services are co-located at the Probation Department s Reentry Services Center or located nearby. Assistance with transportation is provided as needed for those living outside of Salinas. Reentry Services The transition from prison or jail to life in the community can have profound implications for public safety. There are currently two programs specializing in reentry services. The first program is a short-term orientation that provides services during the first month of an offender s release from custody. This program provides a cognitive behavioral approach to introduce participants to a range of life skills to set the stage for a successful term of supervision and break down any initial barriers to treatment so that participants may become treatment ready for longer term programs. During their time in the program, each offender is assessed and their immediate needs and short-term reentry goals are identified. The second program is a long-term treatment program for high risk offenders and it is also used as an alternative to custody for offenders that are in violation of their supervision. This is a nine to twelve-month program that operates seven days per week and provides individualized tailored programming, depending on the participant s risk level and criminogenic needs. Service delivery includes a continuum of intense supervision, monitoring, drug testing, cognitive behavioral treatment and education services. Advancement through the program is divided into three phases. To complete the program, each participant must be employed or enrolled in school, demonstrate at least three months of sobriety, secure stable housing and complete all assigned services. Employment Services Securing gainful employment can be very difficult after release from incarceration, but is critical for a successful re-integration back into the community. A coordinated approach to job readiness, training and employment placement is necessary for many individuals to have a future of self-supporting employment. 2

9 Employment programs offered can support a combination of educational goals and specialized training. There are currently three employment programs funded through AB109, which offer a combination of services ranging from helping people develop the skills, knowledge and tools needed to search for employment, to receiving specialized training, on the job training and subsidized work experience. Service delivery is tailored to the needs and interests of each participant. Housing Services Affordable housing can be especially challenging in Monterey County. Ex-offenders trying to successfully integrate back into the community have significant challenges in finding housing that is affordable, stable, and conducive to making the life style changes needed to avoid negative influences or substance abuse. Emergency housing is available for those trying to reconnect with family or friends and transitional housing is available for those needing longer term support. Both men and women are receiving assistance that includes supervised housing, meals and case management. Participants of the transitional housing program are expected to secure employment and save money for a successful transition into more stable housing. Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Mental health and substance abuse treatment are a critical component of AB109 service delivery. In fact, the highest percentage, roughly one-third of referrals made for treatment, were to address mental health/substance abuse. Reducing recidivism for offenders with mental illness and/or substance abuse requires the use of cognitive behavioral treatment about criminal thinking, anger management and other behavioral issues. Drug abuse treatment can help many offenders change their attitudes, beliefs and behaviors towards drug use, avoid relapse, and successfully remove themselves from a life of substance abuse and crime. Assessment and services for mental health treatment to evaluate psychiatric and mental health needs and provide direct services for short term therapy, group therapy, and crisis management are all offered services. Referrals for other in-patient or out-patient rehabilitate treatment as needed are also included in the services provided. 3

10 AB109 Service Providers: Probation Referral Data for FY The Probation Department has continued to utilize data collection through Social Solutions, Efforts To Outcomes (ETO) program. Referrals submitted to Behavioral Health, Turning Point Housing and Employment Programs, KickStart Employment Program, and the Reentry Program are all tracked in ETO. Rancho Cielo and Day Reporting Center referrals are submitted separately and not included in the data below. Total Number of Referrals Submitted Through ETO: 1013 Total Number of Individuals Referred Through ETO: 511 4

11 Probation Officers can refer probationers who are at high risk for re-offense, or those being supervised under PRCS or Mandatory Supervision. The chart below shows the different areas of need identified by the populations served. 5

12 KickStart Program; Monterey County Workforce Development Board: FY KickStart is an employment program that provides job preparedness workshops and activities, subsidized work experience, on-the-job training and classroom/vocational training. Case management is provided which includes an assessment and individualized employment plan. Supportive services including work related attire, equipment, tools, and other incentives are provided as appropriate. FY Expenditures $351,535 Active Enrollments During the FY 179 Average Service Cost* $1, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 134 Referrals received 77 Assessments were completed 217 In-person contacts made 34 individuals attended: 32 hours of orientation and 576 hours of employment related workshops 30 people received opportunities for Work Experience (fully subsidized employment training) 5 People received On the Job Training (partially subsidized employment training) 13 People participated in vocational training programs 11 people obtained employment through direct referrals, placement, or on their own merit Financial Support given: $9, was provided for supportive services (work attire, tools, transportation, medical and other) $1, was given to participants as incentives for workshop participation $36, was paid for vocational training programs N= 102 Reasons for Non-Completion Generally Unsuccessful 41 45% Never Engaged or Participated 35 17% Unable to Complete Due to Other Issues 17 38% % n= 9 *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 6

13 Turning Point of Central California Employment Program; FY Turning Point is an employment program that provides job preparedness workshops and activities, on-thejob training, and assistance with job search and referrals for employment. Case management is provided which includes an assessment and individualized employment plan. Supportive services including work related attire, equipment, and tools as appropriate. FY Expenditures $280,272 Active Enrollments During the FY 156 Average Service Cost* 1, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 152 Referrals received 65 Assessments were completed 277 In-person contacts made 85 Individuals attended: 86 hours of orientations and 656 hours of employment related workshops 25 People received On the Job Training (partially subsidized employment training) 17 People obtained employment through direct referrals, placement and on their own merit Financial Support given: $ was provided for supportive Services (work attire, tools, transportation, medical and other) Reasons for Non-Completion Generally Unsuccessful 57 59% Never Engaged or Participated 27 28% Unable to Complete Due to Other Issues 12 13% % n= 29 *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 7

14 Turning Point of Central California Housing Program; FY The Turning Point Housing Program provides emergency housing and on-site transitional housing. Program participants receive case management, which includes an assessment, housing related case plan, referrals, coordination or direct placement into emergency, short-term, interim or transitional housing. Short-term subsidized housing (security deposit, 1 st month rent) is available as an incentive for those that are in full compliance with their supervision and have a sustainable income. FY Expenditures $346,892 Active Enrollments During the FY 221 Average Service Cost* $1, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 171 Referrals received 108 Assessments were completed 592 In-person contacts made 80 People received emergency shelter for a total of 2,515 nights 40 Men entered the Transitional House and 35 exited o Of those that exited, 16 people (46%) completed the program 17 Women entered the Transitional House and 15 exited o Of those that exited, 7 people (47%) completed the program N= 188 Reasons for Non-Completion Generally Unsuccessful 82 69% Never Engaged or Participated 32 27% Unable to Complete Due to Other Issues 5 4% % N=69 *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 8

15 GEO Reentry Program FY The Reentry program is a short-term orientation that provides services during the first month of an offender s release from custody. A cognitive behavioral approach is used to introduce participants to a range of life skills to set the stage for a successful term of supervision and service delivery. The primary short term goal for this program is to help participants overcome initial barriers so that they may become treatment ready for longer term programs. Participants are asked to identify their immediate needs and short term goals to work towards while in the program. Program completion is based on the attainment of their short-term reentry goals. Most participants complete the program within their first 30 days of release from custody. FY Expenditures $155, Active Enrollments During the FY 266 Average Service Cost* $ Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 248 Referrals received 165 Assessments were completed 151 Individuals identified short term needs and goals. Top 5 are listed below: N= 253 Reasons for Non-Completion Generally Unsuccessful 64 55% Never Engaged or Participated 32 27% Unable to Complete Due to Other Issues 21 18% % *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 9

16 Monterey County Behavioral Health; FY Behavioral health clinical staff is assigned to the AB109 Access Probation/High Risk Offenders Program at the Probation Department. Officers submit referrals through ETO for mental health and substance abuse assessment and treatment. Although most service delivery is captured in the Behavioral Health case management system, ETO is utilized to capture data as it pertains to referrals submitted and general areas of service delivery. Included is direct services provided by the clinicians and the external referrals made for contracted service providers for inpatient and outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling. FY Expenditures $906,474 Active Enrollments During the FY 456 Average Service Cost* $1, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 338 Referrals received 436 Direct Services were provided in the categories of brief therapy, case management, group therapy, medication management and mental health rehabilitation o 28% Completed services during the fiscal year 96 External referrals were made to other contracted service providers for mental health and substance abuse treatment. o 65 Referrals were made for in-patient residential substance abuse treatment o 24 Referrals were made for out-patient substance abuse treatment N= 337 n= 96 *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 10

17 GEO Reentry Services, Day Reporting Center; FY The Day Reporting Center (DRC) serves a dual purpose. It is a long-term treatment program for high risk offenders and it is used as an alternative to custody for offenders that are in violation of their supervision. This is a 9 to 12 month program that operates seven days per week and provides individualized tailored programming, depending on the participant s risk level and criminogenic needs. Service delivery includes a continuum of intense supervision, monitoring, drug testing, cognitive behavioral treatment, and education services for high risk adult participants. Advancement through the program is divided into three phases. To complete the program, each participant must be employed or enrolled in school, demonstrate at least 90 days of sobriety, 90% rate of compliance, have stable housing, and probation approval for graduation. FY Expenditures** $737,010 Active Enrollments During the FY 336 Average Service Cost* $2, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 268 Referrals received Average daily population receiving case management each month: 67 Average daily count of actively enrolled participants moving through the phase levels: 67 o Average population in each phase: 34 participants: Phase 1 19 participant: Phase 2 4 participants: Phase 3 o Average daily population in Aftercare: 13 (not included in the active daily population) Number of risk/needs assessments conducted: 284 Number of groups conducted: 1,456 Number of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) sessions conducted: 1,327 Rate of scheduled program check-ins: 83% Average percentage of participants that secured/maintained stable employment or education while in the program: 64% Average length of stay for people who complete the program: 456 days N= 335 Reasons for Non-Completion Absconded 11% Generally Unsuccessful 36% Unable to Complete due to Other Issues 53% * Probation subcontracts approximately 1/3 of the contract to CDCR Parole. The total amount of expenditures and statistics in the data shown are for entire populations served, which include parolees. **Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program. 11

18 Rancho Cielo; FY Rancho Cielo is a job readiness and placement program for year old participants. The program lasts 6 months and offers job training and paid employment. It also includes training for soft skills, counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy and an opportunity to earn a high school diploma or G.E.D. Participants complete a volunteer work phase of 40 hours and then move into a paid employment phase where they complete construction related projects on the Rancho Cielo campus and within the community. An educational component is available for those who are interested. FY Expenditures $217,463 Active Enrollments During the FY 15 Average Service Cost* $14, Aggregate Counts of Service Delivery During the Fiscal Year 21 Participants referred / 12 Accepted into the program 4 Participants on average are enrolled each month for subsidized work 3 participants received behavioral health services 9 Independent Development Plans Were Completed During the fiscal year, 10 participants completed the volunteer phase and moved on to subsidized work training During the fiscal year, 8 participants completed the subsidized work phase During the fiscal year, 14 participants were closed, of which 8 completed the program. 4 participants were hired by construction related employers and 4 worked collaboratively with Turning Point through subsidized opportunities. Program Completions Of the 8 participants that completed the program, 100% were employed at the time of their exit. Completed 57% Did not complete 43% N= 14 *Average Service Cost is calculated by the total expenditures divided by number of participants served. It does not account for length of program participation, administrative overhead or indirect costs. 12

19 Terms and Definitions Populations served through AB109 Funded Programs: PRCS (Post Release Community Supervision) Offenders with a prior conviction for a serious or violent felony and had been incarcerated in prison for non-violent, non-serious and non-sexual related crimes who had served their full prison sentence are released and supervised by probation instead of parole. PRCS may be referred to as community supervision since these individuals are not on a traditional grant of probation. Mandatory Supervision Offenders convicted of non-violent, non-serious and non-sexual related crimes may receive a local prison sentence in the county jail as well as a portion of their sentence on supervision with the probation department. Mandatory supervision may also be referred to as community supervision since these individuals are not on a traditional grant of probation. High Risk Probationers: Offenders who received a grant of probation in lieu of prison or a local prison sentence and are assessed to be high risk for reoffending. ETO (Efforts to Outcomes): Implemented in January of 2015 to collect AB109 service provider data as a result of collaboration with Social Services who offered to share their enterprise license. The software has been beneficial in capturing case management, service delivery efforts and outcomes. The Probation Department is currently evaluating other cost effective and user friendly alternatives for future data collection. ETO Outcomes: Completed: Program participant completed the activities or services that were asked of them. Did not Complete: ETO users have the ability to specify why an individual did not complete a program. People referred for housing assistance, mental health, substance abuse treatment and employment programs are not required to participate or complete the program as part of their supervision terms and conditions. The probation officers make referrals based on the participants criminogenic needs and willingness to receive services. Participation is highly encouraged and included within the case plan. However, probation or community supervision cannot generally be revoked as due to non-participation. Generally Unsuccessful: Includes the following categories: Absconded, Stopped Attending, Failed to Participate, Returned to Custody, Violation of Program Rules Never Engaged or Participated: Reflects those that never showed up for the initial intake. Unable to Complete Due to Other Issues: Includes the following categories: Medical Issue, Entered Residential Treatment, Moved, Case Transferred, Case Expired, Unable to Serve, Deceased, Obtained Employment. 13

20 Annual Report July 1, June 30, 2017 III. D

21 Acknowledgments The Monterey County Probation Department would like to acknowledge the members of the Community Corrections Partnership. It is through their ongoing support, leadership and collaboration that the criminal justice realignment continues to be integrated into all aspects of public safety and service delivery. We hope to utilize the data and information collected to better understand the impact of these efforts. Monterey County Probation Department Marcia Parsons Chief Probation Officer Todd Keating Assistant Chief Probation Officer Nancy Hatton Adult Division Director Report prepared by Robin Rodriguez, MSW AB109 Program Manager II

22 Table of Contents Report Overview 3 Review of Public Safety Realignment AB109 Summary 3 Crime Trends in California 4 Community Correction Partnership and Allocation of AB109 Funds 10 Realignment and the Monterey County Jail Population 11 Utilization of Mandatory Supervision 13 Alternatives to Custody 14 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) 17 Mandatory Supervision 25 AB109 Funded Service Providers 33 References 34 2

23 Report Overview California s Public Safety Realignment (AB109/117) was enacted on October 1, 2011, resulting in a significant impact to public safety agencies in Monterey County. The legislative changes affected the sentencing structure of new crimes, jail population and composition, and community supervision through probation and parole. The purpose of this report is to review the events, statistics and trends over the last fiscal year that have impacted areas of public safety in relation to the County of Monterey and partnering agencies. The data utilized was obtained through the Probation Department, Sheriff s Department and California Department of Justice. Review of Public Safety Realignment AB109 Summary The public safety realignment represented one of the most significant changes to California corrections and public safety in decades. Assembly Bills 109 and 117 were enacted primarily as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision requiring a reduction of the prison population. Years of state and local government budget deficits and an unacceptably high recidivism rate for criminal offenders were all factors of the realignment. The public safety realignment is most known for the following changes: To be sentenced to state prison, an individual must have a current or prior serious or violent felony conviction, or be required to register as a sex offender. Inmates serving state prison sentences as a result of convictions defined as non-violent, nonserious and non-sexual are released to the supervision of county probation departments instead of parole. These individuals are referred to as Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS). Individuals convicted of non-violent, non-serious, or non-sexual felonies and have no prior convictions of serious, or violent felonies, no longer receive a state prison sentence. Instead, they are sentenced to a local prison sentence at the county jail. This is defined by statute in the California Penal Code and referred to as 1170(h). Custody credits for jail time served are now equivalent to 50% to mirror the day-for-day custody credits that inmates in state prison receive. Mandatory supervision was created to give Courts the additional tool of splitting the local prison sentence, thereby dividing the sentence between jail custody and supervision by a probation officer in the community. 3

24 Individuals who were being supervised by State Parole are no longer sent back to prison for parole violations, with some exceptions. Instead, they now serve a parole revocation in the local county jail for up to six months. After July 2013, new laws required the local Courts, rather than the State Board of Parole, to conduct parole violation hearings. Crime Trends in California Given the changing variables over the last few years combined with normal shifts in crime trends over time, it continues to be difficult to accurately evaluate the impact of California s legislative changes. The implementation of Proposition 47 affected statistical records that separate felony and misdemeanor crimes, sentencing, and the number of people in custody and on supervision. According to the most recent research conducted by the California Department of Justice, reported crime and arrest rates have continued to shift. Their annual report, Crime in California, 2016, highlights the following: After reaching a low in 2014, the violent crime rate increased by 8.4% and 4.1% from Conversely, the property crime rate decreased by 2.9 % from after increasing 6.6% from Between 2011 and 2016, motor vehicle theft increased by 14.7% and burglary dropped by 22% Over the same period of time, aggravated assault increased by 8.9% Total arrest rates for felonies and misdemeanors decreased by 4% from In 2016, the total violent offense arrest rate decreased 1.5%. The homicide arrest rate remained the same, while rape and kidnapping arrest rates increased by 2.5% and 3.8%. The full report is accessible on their website at and includes additional data and information pertaining to dispositions of adult felony arrests, adult probation, domestic violence, citizen complaints, and officer assaults and deaths. 4

25 Crime trend comparisons between California and Monterey County: From 2015 to 2016, property crime decreased slightly in California, but increased in Monterey County. Violent crime increased slightly in California, but decreased slightly in Monterey County. Chart Reported Crime in California Violent Crimes Property Crimes Chart 2 Reported Crime in Monterey County Violent Crimes Property Crimes 5

26 The next two charts show a breakdown of the reported property crime which is comprised of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. In California, there was a sharp increase in vehicle theft and a decrease in larceny between 2014 and However, in Monterey County, vehicle theft increased for the last 2 years in a row, while burglary decreased. Chart 3 Property Crimes Burglary , ,162 Larceny-Theft , ,676 Motor Vehicle Theft , ,542 Chart 4 Property Crimes Burglary ,812 1,666 Larceny-Theft ,831 2,518 Motor Vehicle Theft ,892 6,212 6

27 These two charts show a breakdown of the reported violent crime which includes the following categories: homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. All categories of violent crime have continued to increase over the last two years in California. Between 2015 and 2016, most categories of violent crime decreased slightly in Monterey County. Chart Reported Violent Crime in California Homicide Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Violent Crime Homicide Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Chart 6 Reported Violent Crime in Monterey Homicide Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Violent Crime Homicide Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault

28 Felony arrests decreased in the last two years, both in Monterey County and California, whereas misdemeanor arrests haven increased slightly overall in both Monterey County and California. The passage of Proposition 47, in November of 2014 reduced some crimes to misdemeanors, previously categorized as felonies. It appears the shift in trends below may have been impacted by this change. People who were arrested for crimes considered to be felonies prior to Prop 47, would have been charged with a misdemeanor after Prop 47. This may have resulted in a reduction of felony arrests as well as an increase in misdemeanor arrests. Chart FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS IN CALIFORNIA NUMBER OF PEOPLE Felony ,27 523,27 499,62 466,44 448,55 419,91 429,80 442,74 439,95 314,74 308,86 Misdemeanor ,58 992,58 1,010, 970,22 918,27 825,45 792,29 750,98 762,00 835,37 804,56 Chart FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS IN MONTEREY COUNTY NUMBER OF PEOPLE Felony ,384 5,047 4,710 4,620 4,425 4,520 4,212 4,513 3,403 3,197 Misdemeanor ,559 9,116 8

29 These two charts compare the categories of all felony arrests for While the crime rates and trends are sometimes very different between California and Monterey County, interestingly, the categories specifying reasons for arrest are very similar. Chart Felony Arrests in California Sex Offenses 2% Other Offenses 26% Drug Offenses 13% Property Offenses 24% Violent Offenses 35% Chart Felony Arrests in Monterey Other Offenses 28% Violent Offenses 38% Sex Offenses 2% Drug Offenses 9% Property Offenses 23% 9

30 Community Corrections Partnership and Allocation of AB109 Funds The Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) was originally established through the Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act of 2009 (SB 678). The executive committee (voting) membership is defined as the Chief Probation Officer (Chair), Chief of Police, Sheriff, District Attorney, Public Defender, Superior Court Presiding Judge or his/her designee and one Board of Supervisors-designated representative from either the Head of Social Services, Head of Mental Health, or Head of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Programs. As a result of AB109, the CCP became responsible for developing a local plan and making recommendations for the distribution of state AB109 funds. The Executive Committee is the decision-making body of the CCP and has the authority to implement policies and programs consistent with the goals identified by the realignment plan in order to maximize the effective investment of criminal justice resources with evidence based strategies and programs. Monterey County receives a yearly allocation to implement the public safety realignment. Chart 11 Table 1 Allocation and Planned Distribution of Funds Fiscal Year Planned Distribution of Expenditures Treatment FY ,777,510 31% 23% 41% 5% FY ,855,898 30% 25% 39% 6% FY ,064,817 30% 25% 39% 6% FY ,436,473 27% 30% 34% 9% *Miscellaneous includes the following: Victim services (District Attorney), training, data, evaluation and infrastructure development 10 Supervision & Detention Alternatives Incarceration Misc.

31 Realignment and the Monterey County Jail Population Extreme overcrowding in California s prison system was the origin of public safety realignment. The State s mandate to drastically reduce its prison population by tens of thousands by shifting lower level felony offenders to the counties changed the composition of jails across the state. The Monterey County jail has a design bed capacity of 825, but at times has housed up to 1,150 detainees. When public safety realignment was implemented it was anticipated the jail population would continue to increase. Monterey County and the Superior Court utilize programs that help offset the jail population. The Own Recognizance (OR) Policy to release people from custody on their own recognizance, the Work Alternative Program, Pre-Trial Release Program and Residential Substance Abuse Placement Program are all programs currently utilized. Despite added services and alternatives to custody, the jail population initially continued to expand. Part of the AB109 allocated funds dedicated to incarceration also enabled the County to transfer inmates to other counties who had extra jail capacity. The jail utilized Alameda County for additional bed space but since the inmate population has declined during the last fiscal year, the need to transport inmates out of county has diminished. At the end of June 2017 there were only two inmates remaining in Alameda County s Jail. Chart Average Daily Jail Population for FY Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 11

32 Chart 13 Average Daily Population Per Month by Fiscal Year FY FY FY FY FY Public safety realignment changed the composition of inmates housed in the jail. Prior to realignment, local jails housed people who were pending sentencing for new charges or inmates who had been sentenced to less than one year of incarceration. The realigned population includes those that would have been sent to prison, but are now sentenced to jail, for a local prison sentence served in the county jail. This has resulted in inmates being housed for a longer period of time, requiring additional medical and mental health treatment, rehabilitative services and programs. Monterey County has now started construction on their jail expansion to provide additional space for rehabilitative services, treatment, and programs. As of June 2017, inmates serving a local prison sentence (1170(h)) represented 17% of the total average daily population and 51% of the sentenced population. Chart 14 Percentage of 1170(h) Inmates Serving Local Prison Sentences Within the Total Jail Population 16% 15% 14% 15% 15% 14% 17% 17% 16% 20% 19% 17% Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 12

33 Utilization of Mandatory Supervision Realignment gave the courts the additional tool to split sentences. A split sentence allows a judge to split the time between custody and supervision in the community. The period of supervision is referred to as mandatory supervision. Conversely, inmates that receive a straight jail sentence are released from custody once their sentence is served without any supervision. The chart below shows the number of 1170(h) straight jail sentences given by the court in comparison to the mandatory supervision sentences. 30 Chart (h) Sentences by Straight Jail and Mandatory Supervision Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Straight Jail Mandatory Supervision It was anticipated that the number of Mandatory Supervision sentences would continue to increase each year. The Passage of Proposition 47 in November of 2014 coincides with the reduction beginning in the fiscal year, which may have played a role in the overall decline. Chart 16 13

34 Alternatives to Custody The safety of the community is always considered when determining the need for incarceration. There are well established strategies to manage risk to the community when diverting or releasing certain individuals from custody and several of these are utilized by Monterey County for both sentenced and unsentenced populations. Own Recognizance (OR) In the last fiscal year, there were approximately 10,103 bookings into the Monterey County Jail, for an average of 842 per month. Chart 17 Number of Arrestees Released on Own Recognizance (OR) Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Work Alternative Program: New Bookings per Month The Monterey County Jail Work Alternative Program allows offenders to perform physical labor as an alternative to jail custody. They are given a date to appear for their work assignment and then booked and enrolled into the program at the jail on the scheduled date. During the fiscal year, 2,177 people participated in the Work Alternative Program, for an average of 181 per month. Chart 18 Work Alternative Bookings Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 14

35 Supervised Home Confinement (SHC): New Bookings per Month SHC is a program that utilizes electronic monitoring and supervision for those who voluntarily apply. Approved participants are released from custody with an electronic monitoring device and supervised by the Probation Department. On average, 30 new participants are enrolled each month. Chart 19 Supervised Home Confinement - New Bookings Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Residential Substance Abuse Placement Program Many inmates need treatment in a residential setting to address their substance abuse and addiction. Facilitating their application process and transporting them directly from custody to the treatment facility allows many people to be released from jail prior to completing their sentence. Within the fiscal year, 197 inmates were placed into residential treatment programs throughout the Central Coast and Northern California. Chart 20 Residential Substance Abuse Placement Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 15

36 Pre-Trial Supervision The Probation Department completes risk assessments and court reports prior to arraignment for newly booked inmates that are potentially eligible for release. At the beginning of 2017, the court started to make referrals directly to the Pre-Trial program. Judges determine who will remain in custody or be released for pretrial supervision pending subsequent court appearances and hearings. Chart 21 Individuals Released For Pre-Trial Supervision Each Month JUL-16 AUG-16 SEP-16 OCT-16 NOV-16 DEC-16 JAN-17 FEB-17 MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 The number of defendants released for pre-trial supervision has continued to increase. During the fiscal year, 118 people were released from the Monterey County Jail, whereas in the previous year, 60 were released. As a result, the number of people actively being supervised each month has increased. Chart 22 Individuals Active on Pre-Trial Supervision Each Month Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 16

37 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) PRCS individuals are those who have served their prison sentence and are released to Probation for three years of supervision instead of being released to Parole. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) identifies eligible inmates who were convicted of non-violent, non-serious, nonsexual related crimes to be released to their county of residence for PRCS supervision. During the fiscal year, Monterey County Probation received 213 new PRCS cases for supervision with an average of 18 people being released each month. Most of the individuals are released directly from CDCR; however, the County may also receive people who transfer from a different county of residence. Chart 23 Of the individuals released from prison during the fiscal year, 7% failed to initially report for supervision. Of the 1,331 people received for PRCS supervision since the beginning of realignment in 2011, 5.4% failed to initially report for supervision. Warrants of arrest are issued by the court for people who fail to report after being released or abscond during supervision. Of the individuals who initially absconded, 72% have been apprehended. 17

38 The average number of PRCS active cases during the fiscal year was 356. Of the total number of cases supervised, there are approximately 34% on warrant at any given time. This chart below displays number of cases, active and warrant, on the last day of each month. Chart Monthly Active PRCS Cases Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 PRCS Active Cases PRCS Warrants Risk Assessments: The use of a comprehensive risk assessment tool is an integral component of evidence based practices that support reentering offenders. It is necessary to identify individuals who are at a higher risk to re-offend, so that they can receive appropriate levels of supervision and rehabilitative services targeted to meet the areas of assessed need. The Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) is the designated tool utilized by the Probation Department and scores individuals from low to very high in terms of risk for re-offense. 54% of PRCS individuals scored high and very high for risk to reoffend. Their scores are higher on average than the general probation population. 18

39 During the fiscal year, there were a total of 547 people supervised. The chart below shows the levels of risk and supervision for the PRCS population and is inclusive of anyone who had an open case during the fiscal year. Chart 25 PRCS Level of Risk and Supervision High* 45% Very High* 9% Moderate 31% Low 15% Table 2 ORAS Assessment Number of Individuals Percentage Low 83 15% Moderate % High* % Very High* 51 9% Total % *High risk level scores indicate the need for higher levels of supervision and treatment 19

40 PRCS demographic information is presented for all individuals supervised from July 1, 2016 through June 30, Chart 26 N=547 PRCS Age PRCS Race % % % 6% 20% 31% Hispanic 66% White 19% Black 12% Asian Other 2% 1% PRCS Gender Male 93% Female 7% PRCS Homeless Population 5.7% (31 people) were homeless. Of the homeless population, the majority (68%) were residing in Salinas with 16% on the Peninsula and 16% in other parts of the county. Probation identifies someone as homeless when they do not have a stable or verifiable address. This includes people who are transient, sleeping in different locations, shelters, or vehicles. 20

41 PRCS Violations: Probation officers providing supervision to PRCS individuals are responsible for monitoring their compliance with designated terms and conditions specified upon their release from prison. These conditions may include reporting instructions, drug testing and rehabilitative program participation, among other activities specific to their individual needs. Chart 27 When an individual fails to comply with their terms and conditions, they may be found in violation of their supervision. During the Fiscal Year 16-17, 251 people, (46% of the population) had a total of 547 violations. There are three categories of violations. Technical violations involve issues relating to non-compliance with terms and conditions of supervision, whereas felony and misdemeanor violations reflect new arrests or charges filed. Of all violations recorded for the population, technical Violations Individuals Supervised With No Violations 54% Individuals With One or More Violations 46% N = 547 Table 3 violations occur at the highest rate of frequency and include failure to show for scheduled appointments, refusal to participate in a rehabilitative program, drug use, failure to report address, or other noncompliant behavior. In accordance with evidence based practices, the Probation Department uses graduated sanctions in response to violations. The objective is to hold people accountable and assist them with a successful integration back into the community, with the longer-term goal of reducing recidivism. Technical violations are viewed as part of the rehabilitative process and the sanctions or response to a technical violation may include an admonishment, written assignment or journaling, increased drug testing or increased frequency of reporting to the probation officer, as well as additional or increased treatment requirements. 21

42 Some violations may result in the individual returning to jail. Probation officers evaluate the severity of misconduct and public safety when determining whether or not to return an individual to custody for a violation. During the fiscal year, 31% (170 people) of those supervised (547) were booked in the county jail for a custodial sanction. Custodial sanctions for the PRCS population are limited to 180 days. Flash incarceration is a tool used to impose brief periods of incarceration, between one to ten days. If a more significant period of incarceration is warranted, an individual on PRCS can receive up to 180 days of custody. This term of incarceration may be the result of a petition to revoke supervision followed by a formal court hearing, or the individual may admit the violation and accept the term of incarceration proposed and waive a formal court hearing. Custodial sanctions are primarily used when non-custodial sanctions have not been effective in correcting non-compliance. Probation officers generally start with lower level sanctions, and increase the sanction if non-compliant behavior continues to be an issue. Chart 28 n = 304 N =

43 PRCS Closed Cases: Of those supervised in the fiscal year, 180 cases were closed. Successful closures are defined as individuals who have had no custodial sanctions or violations for six months which qualifies as an early closure. By operation of law, all cases must be closed after twelve months if there were no custodial sanctions. The category of successful cases also includes those that have expired. PRCS cases expire after three years of supervision. Transferred cases represent those that no longer reside in Monterey County. Cases that are unsuccessful represent those who committed a technical violation or new law violation and consequently their PRCS case was terminated by the Court. Chart 29 PRCS Case Outcomes FY Successful 61% Unsuccessful 29% Transferred 9% N= 180 Deceased 1% 23

44 PRCS Recidivism and Prison Returns The Probation Department has historically been limited to capturing new felony or misdemeanor convictions that resulted in a case closure. The majority of new felony convictions result in a formal revocation and case closure, although some misdemeanor convictions do not. For future reporting, we will increase our reporting to include situations where a new conviction occurred during supervision, but did not result in a case closure. This will be due to an expansion in our internal data collection. Of the PRCS population supervised during the last fiscal year (547), 53 people (10%) had a new misdemeanor or felony conviction which resulted in a case closure. Chart 30 Chart 31 Types of New Convictions N = Table 4 New Felony Conviction New Misdemeanor Conviction Outcome of New Convictions Returned to Prison Number of People Who Returned to Prison: 34 Percentage of the Unsuccessful cases 64.2% Percentage of the supervised population: 6.20% Local Prison Sentence (1170H) Number of People Sentenced 1170H: 17 Percentage of the Unsuccessful cases 32.1% Percentage of the supervised population: 3.10% 24

45 Mandatory Supervision Monterey County s mandatory supervision population started off relatively small, but has continued to gradually increase over time. People are sentenced by the court and after serving a designated period of time in jail, they are released for mandatory supervision. The chart below illustrates the number of individuals sentenced and those released for supervision over the last several fiscal years. Chart FY FY FY FY FY FY People Sentenced People Released During the fiscal year, 67 people were released from custody and started mandatory supervision, an average of 12 per month. Chart 33 Inmates Released for Mandatory Supervision Each Month (FY 16-17) Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 25

46 As of June 30, 2017, there were 106 people on mandatory supervision with 30% having an active warrant. The chart below displays number of active and warrant cases on the last day of each month during the fiscal year. Chart Monthly Active Mandatory Supervision Cases Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 MS Active Cases MS Warrants 26

47 Mandatory Supervision Risk Assessments: The Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) is also used for mandatory supervision cases. 62% of those supervised scored high and very high for risk to reoffend. The Mandatory Supervision population has the highest risk for re-offense when compared to PRCS or other probationers. Chart 35 Mandatory Supervision Level of Risk and Supervision High* 51% Moderate 23% Very High* 11% Low 15% Table 5 ORAS Assessment Number of Individuals Percentage Low 24 15% Moderate 36 23% High* 80 51% Very High* 17 11% Total % *High risk level scores indicate the need for higher levels of supervision and treatment 27

48 Mandatory supervision demographic information is presented for all individuals supervised from July 1, 2016 through June 30, Chart 36 N=157 Mandatory Supervision Age Mandatory Supervision Race % % % 25% Hispanic 51% White 39% % % Other 1% Asian 1% Black 8% Mandatory Supervision Gender Male 80% Female 20% Mandatory Supervision Homeless Population 6.3% (10 people) were homeless. Of the homeless population, the majority (70%) were residing in Salinas and 30% on the Peninsula. Probation identifies someone as homeless when they do not have a stable or verifiable address. This includes people who are transient, sleeping in different locations, shelters, or vehicles. 28

49 Mandatory Supervision Violations: Probation officers providing supervision to people on Mandatory Supervision are responsible for monitoring compliance with designated terms and conditions specified by the Court. These conditions may include reporting instructions, drug testing or rehabilitative program participation, among other things specific to their individual needs. When an individual fails to comply with their terms and conditions, they may be found in violation of their supervision. During the Fiscal Year 16-17, 67 people (43% of the population) had a total of 115 violations. There are three categories of violations. Technical violations involve issues relating to non-compliance with terms and conditions of supervision, whereas felony or misdemeanor violations reflect new arrests or charges. Chart 37 Violations Individuals Supervised With No Violations 57% Individuals With One or More Violations 43% Of all violations recorded for the population, technical violations occurred in Mandatory Supervision cases at the highest rate of frequency and include failure to show for scheduled appointments, refusal to participate in a program, drug use, failure to report a new address or other non-compliant behavior. In accordance with evidence based practices, the Probation Department uses graduated sanctions in response to violations, with the goal of improving compliance and increasing a successful completion of probation. Table 6 FY Types of MS Violations Technical % Misdemeanor % Felony % Total % Technical violations are viewed as part of the rehabilitative process and the sanctions or response to a technical violation may include an admonishment, written assignment, increased drug testing or increased frequency of reporting to the probation officer, as well as additional referrals for service delivery when needed. 29

50 Some violations can result in the individual returning to jail. Probation officers evaluate the severity of misconduct and public safety when determining whether or not to return an individual to custody for a violation. During the fiscal year, 36%, or 56 people, of those supervised (157) were booked into the county jail for a custodial sanction. Custodial sanctions for the Mandatory Supervision population were originally limited to an individual being arrested for violating their terms and conditions and the officer filing a petition with the court to revoke supervision. However, because of legislative changes during the fiscal year, flash incarceration (from one to ten days) can now be utilized as a custodial sanction for this population. This change was implemented towards the end of the fiscal year and therefore, no flash incarcerations occurred within the time frame of this report. The custodial sanctions in this chart represent individuals who were returned to custody with a formal petition being filed with the court. If the individual is found to be in violation, the judge may revoke their supervision and incarcerate them, modify the conditions of their supervision or terminate their case. Chart 38 Mandatory Supervision Custodial Sanctions Individuals Supervised with No Custodial Sanctions 64% Individuals Who Received a Custodial Sanction 36% N=157 30

51 Closed Cases: Of those supervised in the fiscal year, 63 cases were closed. Since some individuals were being supervised on more than one case, the percentages below reflect all closed cases in the time frame. 9.4% of the population being supervised had more than one case Successful closures represent those who had an outcome of successful or expired. Transferred cases represent those that moved out of county. Cases closed due to Proposition 47 reflect those that qualified to have their charge reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor. Cases that closed unsuccessfully represent those who committed a technical violation or new law violation and their Mandatory Supervision case was revoked and terminated by the Court. Chart 39 Mandatory Supervision Case Outcomes FY Successful 30% Unsuccessful 59% Prop 47 6% N =157 Transferred 5% 31

52 Mandatory Supervision Recidivism and Prison Returns The Probation Department has historically been limited to capturing new felony or misdemeanor convictions that resulted in a case closure. The majority of new felony convictions result in a formal revocation and case closure, although some misdemeanor convictions do not. For future reporting, we will increase our reporting to include situations where a new conviction occurred during supervision, but did not result in a case closure. This will be due to an expansion in our internal data collection. Of the Mandatory Supervision population supervised during the last fiscal year 16 people (10.2%) had a new misdemeanor or felony conviction which resulted in a case closure. Chart 40 Chart 41 N=157 Table 6 Outcome of New Convictions Returned to Prison Number of People Who Returned to Prison: 3 Percentage of the Unsuccessful Closures 8.1% Percentage of the supervised population: 1.9% Local Prison Sentence (1170H) Number of People Sentenced 1170H: 5 Percentage of the Unsuccessful Closures 13.5% Percentage of the population supervised: 3.2% 32

53 AB109 Funded Services AB109 funds continue to provide services and case management in the areas of re-entry, employment, housing, behavioral health and substance abuse treatment. Social Services remains a non-funded collaborative partner to assist with accessing community benefits by providing on site staff and helping with eligibility related questions. Many of our AB109 Partners are co-located at the Probation Department s Reentry Services Center or located close by. For statistical data in relation to service providers, please refer to the AB109 Service Delivery Report, located at the County of Monterey, CCP website. 33

54 References California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) at Guidelines for Recidivism Studies: Performance Metrics for Community Corrections: BSCC Data Dashboards at State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General at: Interactive Crime Statistics Tables for Arrests ( Interactive Crime Statistics Tables for Crimes ( Crime in California-2016 Report: at Chief Probation Officers of California CPOC Issue Brief, Realignment Perspective; A first Look at Statewide Data Trends and Impacts, July

55 Monterey County Community Corrections Partnership Quarterly Report: October 1, 2017 December 31, 2017 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) active cases on the last day of each month: III. E 420 Active PRCS Cases Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Mandatory Supervision active cases on the last day of each month: Active Mandatory Supervision Cases Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 In the last quarter, 22% of all 1170(h) local prison sentences included Mandatory Supervision. When inmates are released with Mandatory Supervision, they have an opportunity to participate in all AB109 related rehabilitative services as well as receiving the additional support and supervision provided by their Probation Officer. Ratio of Mandatory Supervision Sentences to 1170(h) Straight Local Prison Sentences 1170(h) Local Prison Sentences 78% *Percentage based on individuals Mandatory Supervision Sentences 22% 1 1

56 AB109 Demographic Data All data reported represents 556 people who had an active Mandatory Supervision or Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) case during the quarter. AB109 Geographic Residency AB109 Case Type PRCS 78% Salinas 43% Mandatory Supervision 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%. Other* 26% Monterey Pennisula 16% South County 11% North County 4% 7% AB109 Age Range 40% 27% 19% 6% 1% AB109 Race/Ethnicity AB109 Gender Other 2% Asian Black 2% 11% Male 90% Female 10% White 24% Hispanic 61% AB109 Levels of Risk and Supervision Moderate 34% High 45% Very High 9% Low 12% Risk Assessment: Probation utilizes the ORAS (Ohio Risk Assessment System) to calculate an individual s risk to re-offend. Effective probation supervision utilizing evidence based practices indicate that those with a score of moderate to high are most likely to benefit from rehabilitative services. Supervision correlates with risk; those that are at a higher risk to reoffend are monitored more closely. 22

57 Monterey County Jail Data Average Daily Jail Population Per Month Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 *Numbers represent the average daily population per month. Does not include those transfered to another facility 1000 Sentenced vs Non-Sentenced Inmates Gender of Inmates % 39% 39% (352) (342) (332) 61% 61% 61% Male 88% Female 12% 200 (552) (540) (514) 0 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Non-Sentenced Inmates Sentenced Inmates Note: This is not a reflection of the number of individuals eligible for pretrial release. The number of Non-Sentenced inmates reflects everyone in custody without a release date, including parole and probation violators. Calculation based on quarterly average of ADP As of 12/31/2017, 1170(h) sentenced inmates represent 17% of the total ADP and 44% of the total sentenced population. Jail Population Oct 2017 Nov 2017 Dec 2017 Inmates transported to other facilities Inmates being housed in another facility at the end of the month Number of 1170(h) Inmates in custody at the end of the month (This count may also include Parole, Probation, PRCS and Mandatory Supervision) Number of offenders sentenced to 1170(h) Local Prison Sentence (This count may also include Parole, Probation, PRCS and Mandatory Supervision)

58 Probation and Jail Alternatives to Custody Oct 2017 Nov 2017 Dec 2017 Non-Sentenced Inmates Released Total Number of Inmates Released on their Own Recognizance The count provided represents inmates who qualified to be released on their own recognizance after booking pursuant to the Jail Own Recognizance (O.R.) Policy, Superior Court of California, County of Monterey Criminal Bail Schedule, Appendix C. Pre-Trial Supervision Releases This program supervises defendants in the community while they await the outcome of their charge(s). These defendants were formally authorized by the Court to be released onto pre-trial supervision Work Alternative Program: New Bookings Per Month This count represents the number of people who are booked into the Work Alternative Program instead of serving time in jail custody. They are booked and enrolled into the program and given a date in the future to appear for their work assignment Supervised Home Confinement This count represents sentenced people who applied and were accepted into the Supervised Home Confinement Program in lieu of serving time in jail. Electronic monitoring is utilized to monitor their compliance with rules of the program Residential Substance Abuse Placement This count represents people who were approved to participate in a residential substance abuse treatment program in lieu of serving time in jail or for a portion of their custody time

59 Summary of Total Funding and Annual Expenditures Public Safety Realignment Actual and Projected Expenditures, Funding and Reserve July 1, 2015 through June 30, /7/2018 IV. A In FY15-16 the Base Allocation % set for Counties & Growth Formula updated FY17-18 is the first year of realigned and "actual" expenditures. This factor, along with the new formalized Base Alloc % for revenue supports a more refined and realistic forecast for FY18 and beyond. Factors that affect forecast include: State Sales Tax and VLF collection, County department savings (unspent budget), unplanned appropriation of Fund Balance, unstable Growth allocation and State budget projections that typically occur in January and May for the forthcoming fiscal year. Current Year ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 Main Allocation (Base)* 11,159,775 11,704,760 12,505,297 13,354,727 14,053,440 14,748,860 Planning Grant ** 150, , , , , ,000 Growth Allocation *** 844, , , , , ,024 Total Annual Funding 12,154,307 12,437,477 13,336,414 14,203,440 14,898,860 15,608,885 Fund Balance/Reserve 5,218,053 7,269,328 9,922,795 8,741,358 8,186,906 8,089,044 Total Funding 17,372,360 19,706,805 23,259,209 22,944,798 23,085,767 23,697,928 Total Budget: 12,855,898 13,064,817 13,436,473 14,757,892 14,996,723 15,596,592 11/13/17 Sheriff's Office Augmentation 1,081,378 Annual Expenditures**** 10,103,032 9,784,010 14,517,851 14,757,892 14,996,723 15,596,592 Year End Fund Balance (less Annual Reserve) 7,269,328 8,057,173 7,822,274 6,056,390 5,854,215 5,760,004 Annual Reserve (resides in Fund Balance) 0 1,865,622 2,000,462 2,130,516 2,234,829 2,341,333 Less: Annual Reserve Requests 0 0 (1,081,378) Net Annual Reserve Balance: 0 1,865, ,084 2,130,516 2,234,829 2,341,333 Total Fund Balance: 7,269,328 9,922,795 8,741,358 8,186,906 8,089,044 8,101,336 Notes: *Main Allocation (Base) for FY is based on the published Base and Growth table provided on September 13, 2017 by California State Association of Counties. Base projection for FY18-19 has been updated to reflect the Govenor's January Proposed State Budget. From FY and on, the projections assume State sales tax revenues meet base allocation requirements. Each year base allocation projection at State level is derived from the prior years base allocation plus growth allocation. **Planning Grant assumes continuation of $150K Planning grant, approved yearly by the State, and subject to submission of annual CCP survey to BSCC ***Effective FY 16-17, Growth Allocation reflects a 10% reduction for the Local Innovation Subaccount -Growth estimates are generated, and actual funds received, in arrears, after the end of the related fiscal year -Growth allocation for FY18-19 has been updated to reflect the Govenor's January Proposed State Budget with increases forecasted at 2.1% per year. ****Annual Expenditures projections are based on the FY18-19 recommended budget of $14,757,892 and include in FY and FY ; 1) a 4% COLA to cover cost escalators and 2) decreases for the one- time budget items included in the FY18-19 of $193,200 for Probation ITD programming and $144,766 for the Text Reminder program.

60 IV. B M E M O R A N D U M COUNTY OF MONTEREY PROBATION DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION February 7, 2018 TO: FROM: Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Members Probation Staff MEETING: February 12, 2018 SUBJECT: Item IV. B FY Budget a. Approve the baseline Budget for FY including Recommended Reallocations b. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $294,664 by the Sheriff s Office c. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $81,560 by the Public Defender d. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $204,006 by the Probation Department e. Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $144,766 by the Superior Court, sponsored by Probation The Recommended Budget for FY 18-19, in the total amount of $14,757,892, constitutes a variance of $1,321,419 from the FY Budget of $13,436,473, and is composed of: Baseline Budget for FY in the amount of $14,032,896, which supports all existing programs at the current service level, including: o Escalators for negotiated salary and benefits increases for County staff; and o Realignment of funding in the amount of $795,708 to more closely reflect actual expenditures and support additional needs within the Probation, Public Defender and Sheriff s budgets, and specifically: $47,638 reallocation within Probation s budget as service administrator to reflect a negotiated decrease in the contract for employment services with Rancho Cielo to better align the number of participants served; $42,734 reallocation within the Public Defender s budget due to lower position cost for Early Court Resolution to offset cost of 1.00 FTE Legal Secretary; $705,336 reallocation within the Sheriff s budget from multiple areas to partially support the increase inmate health care costs associated with higher levels of care. Augmentation requests in the amount of $724,996 for: o Funding in the amount of $294,664 to partially support the Sheriff s inmate heath care costs;

61 o o o Funding in the amount of $81,560 towards 1.0 FTE Legal Secretary in the Public Defender s budget to support residents who have criminal convictions with postsentence relief; Funding in the amount of $204,006 in Probation s budget as service administrator to the contract with a provider of housing services to increase service capacity; Funding in the amount of $144,766 in Probation s budget as service administrator for a one-time augmentation request for a new service, the Text Reminder Program, managed by the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey. The Text Reminder Program utilizes a technology solution to generate text message reminders in order to improve offenders appearance rate to criminal Court hearings. Recommended Budget The combined result of the realigned budgets, cost escalators, reallocations, and augmentations for FY amounts to $14,757,892, a $1,321,419 (or 9.83%) increase from the prior year, and is funded by the projected yearly allocation of $14,203,440 plus $554,452 from Fund Balance. These actions would leave an estimated Fund Balance of $6,056,390, assuming the current fiscal year budget will be fully spent in FY 17-18; otherwise, the current Fund Balance projections would increase. This Fund Balance is in addition to the policy-established FY Reserve of $2,130,516. It is therefore recommended that the CCP: a) Approve the baseline Budget for FY 18-19, including recommended Reallocations as presented; b) Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $294,664 by the Sheriff s Office; c) Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $81,560 by the Public Defender; d) Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $204,006 by the Probation Department; and e) Approve FY Funding Augmentation Request in the amount of $144,766 by the Superior Court, sponsored by Probation. Attachments: A. AB 109-Public Safety Realignment FY Budget with Reallocations and Augmentations B. Summary of Reallocations and Augmentations Requests FY FY Public Safety Realignment Budget Page 2 of 2

62 Page 1 of 2 IV. B Monterey County Community Corrections Partnership 2/7/2018 AB109-Public Safety Realignment FY Requested Budget with Reallocations and Augmentations CCP Approved Fiscal Year Requested Fiscal Year Major Program Dept/Agency Program/Service Description FY Staffing FY Staffing County FTE Total CCP Approved Budget County FTE Department Requested Budget Variance from FY FTE Psychiatric Social Worker 3.0 FTE Psychiatric Social Worker II II 2.0 FTE Sr Treatment Behavioral Health Assessment 2.0 FTE Sr Psychiatric Social Worker Psychiatric Social Worker , ,179 1,782 Treatment Behavioral Health Pharmacy Outpatient/Residential (Substance Abuse , ,000 0 Treatment Behavioral Health & Dual Diagnosis) , ,145 (1,644) Treatment Behavioral Health Other Special Department Expenses ,000 8, ,297, ,305,324 8,138 Supervision Probation Alternative to Detention 4.0 FTE Probation Officer II 4.0 FTE Probation Officer II , ,440 36,640 Supervision Probation Pre-trial and Adult Placement 2.0 FTE Probation Officer II 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III 1.0 FTE Probation Aide 2.0 FTE Probation Officer II 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III 1.0 FTE Probation Aide , ,149 34,071 Supervision Probation Pre-trial-Probation Aide 1.0 FTE Probation Aide , ,885 2,011 Supervision Probation Electronic Monitoring , ,000 0 Supervision Probation Community Corrections 8.0 FTE Probation Officer II 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III 1.0 Probation Services Manager 1.0 Office Assistant II 8.0 FTE Probation Officer II 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III 1.0 Probation Services Manager 1.0 Office Assistant II ,767, ,971, ,216 Supervision Probation Evidence Based Compliance 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III 1.0 FTE Probation Officer III , ,283 17,163 Supervision Probation Training , , FTE Management Analyst III 1.0 FTE Accountant I 1.0 FTE Business Tech Analyst II 1.0 FTE Departmental Information Systems Coordinator 1.0 FTE Senior Secretary 1.0 FTE Management Analyst III 1.0 FTE Accountant I 1.0 FTE Business Tech Analyst II 1.0 FTE Departmental Information Systems Coordinator 1.0 FTE Senior Secretary Supervision Probation Data Eval/Fiscal & Program Compliance/Admin , ,200 45,482 Supervision Probation Program Manager II 1.0 FTE Program Manager II , ,278 7, ,423, ,769, ,173 Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator OET - Employment 2.0 FTE Workforce Investment Board Representative II 1.8 FTE Workforce Investment Board Representative II.20 Office Assistant II , ,755 2,870 Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator Adult Day Reporting Center (ADRC) , ,375 0 Criminal Justice Data Infrastructure Supervision Probation Project , ,200 0 Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator Data Evaluation , ,000 0 Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator Housing , , ,006 Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator Employment , ,508 (47,638) Re-Entry Probation - Service Administrator Treatment , ,800 0 Supervision Probation - Service Administrator Pre-trial Text Reminder Program - Superior Court , , ,453, ,757, ,004

63 Page 2 of 2 IV. B Monterey County Community Corrections Partnership 2/7/2018 AB109-Public Safety Realignment FY Requested Budget with Reallocations and Augmentations CCP Approved Fiscal Year Requested Fiscal Year Total CCP County Approved County Department Requested Variance from FY2017- Major Program Dept/Agency Program/Service Description FY Staffing FY Staffing FTE Budget FTE Budget 18 Victim Services District Attorney Victim Services 1.0 FTE Victim Advocate 1.0 FTE Victim Advocate , , Early Resolution Court-Deputy Distict Alternative to Detention District Attorney Attorney IV 1.0 FTE Deputy District Attorney IV 1.0 FTE Deputy District Attorney IV , ,879 3, , ,334 4, FTE Deputy Sheriff - Classification 1.0 FTE Deputy Sheriff - Custody Sheriff Supervision Classification , ,368 21, FTE Deputy Sheriff -Transport 1.0 FTE Deputy Sheriff -Transport 1.0 FTE Criminal Intelligence Specialist 1.0 FTE Criminal Intelligence 2.0 FTE Management Analyst III Specialist 2.0 FTE Management Analyst III Custody Sheriff Transportation & Data Evaluation , ,538 76,549 Custody Sheriff Custody-Deputies Supervisor 1.0 FTE Sheriff's Sergeant 1.0 FTE Sheriff's Sergeant , ,522 27,433 Custody Sheriff Jail Safety Equipment , (350,000) Custody Sheriff Catastrophic Medical , (100,000) Custody Sheriff In-Custody Treatment , ,000 (30,000) Custody Sheriff Parole Beds in County , ,506 (225,336) Custody Sheriff Jail Beds Out-of-County , , FTE Deputy Sheriff FTE Deputy Sheriff - Custody Sheriff Medical Escort Deputies and Transport Jail/Corrections Jail/Corrections ,403, ,556, ,883 Custody Sheriff Intake Nurse Services , ,373 3,858 Custody Sheriff Inmate Healthcare Program ,000,000 1,000, ,677, ,254, ,227 Early Resolution Court - Public Defender Alternative to Detention Public Defender IV 1.0 FTE Public Defender IV 1.0 FTE Public Defender III , ,330 (42,734) Re-Entry Public Defender Post Sentence Relief 1.0 FTE Legal Secretary , , , ,624 81,560 Grand Total: ,436, ,757,892 1,321, %

64 IV. B CCP Summary of Reallocations and Augmentations Requests FY Type of Request Reallocation County Department Probation as Service Administrator Program Name/ Area Description Amount Requested County Staffing Required Notes/Comments Employment services Reallocation within Probation s budget as service administrator to reflect a negotiated decrease in the contract for employment services with Rancho Cielo to better align the number of participants served. (47,638) N/A Reallocation Public Defender Early Resolution Court Lower position cost due to underfill and reduction in services and supplies 42,734 Reallocation Sheriff Inmate health care Augmentation Sheriff Inmate health care Funding to address increasing standards of care for long term sentences on local inmates. Realignment and subsequent litigation resulted in additional heath care personnel allocations to address medical, mental health, and dental issues in jail, as well as quality assurance enhancement requiring services accredited by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC), with higher health standards, continuity of care, aid in re-entry and post release treatment for inmates that will frequent local clinics once they leave custody. Funding to address increasing standards of care for long term sentences on local inmates. Realignment and subsequent litigation resulted in additional heath care personnel allocations to address medical, mental health, and dental issues in jail, as well as quality assurance enhancement requiring services accredited by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC), with higher health standards, continuity of care, aid in re-entry and post release treatment for inmates that will frequent local clinics once they leave custody. 705, ,664 Requested in FY as onetime cost Requested in FY as onetime cost The total $1.0 Million request is a combination of reallocation of $705,336 and an augmentation of $294,664 to support increasing inmate health care costs associated with higher levels of care. The total $1.0 Million request is a combination of reallocation of $705,336 and an augmentation of $294,664 to support increasing inmate health care costs associated with higher levels of care. Augmentation Public Defender Offender post-sentence relief services Provide post sentence relief to offenders, such as Penal Code Section (expungement), Penal Code 17(b) (reducing felony convictions to misdemeanors), Prop. 57 and 64 (reducing marijuana convictions), Certificates of Rehabilitation and/or Pardons, and Prop. 47 (reduces certain felonies to misdemeanors). The total number of individuals served is projected to increase by approximately thirty percent with the addition of a full time legal secretary. 81, FTE Legal Secretary Augmentation Probation as Service Administrator Housing Increase the contract with Turning Point of Central CA by $204,006 annually to expand capacity for transitional housing at a rate of $55/day for 28 individuals per day. It will also include a $6,000 budget for short term motel stays and rental assistance. 204,006 N/A Augmentation Probation as Service Administrator Court's Text Reminder Program Clients cited by law enforcement and defendants released from the Monterey County Jail will receive a reminder text message the evening before their initial court appearance. The Text Reminder Program will reduce the failure to appear (FTA) rates in criminal courts, reduce the number of warrants that are processed and issued, reduce incarceration rates, and promote finality of judgments, which enhances both deterrence and rehabilitation. 144,766 N/A One-time funding 2/7/2018

65 IV. B. E Monterey County Superior Court Criminal FTA Status Report Executive Summary Criminal failures to appear (FTAs) at Monterey County Superior Court increased dramatically, exceeding eleven thousand occurrences in The composition of cases resulting in a FTA reflects significant change as well: FTAs associated with misdemeanor cases are up significantly from 2012, while those resulting from felony cases ended 2016 slightly lower than 2012 levels. FTAS BY CALENDAR YEAR Criminal Case Filings Annual criminal case filings could potentially drive changes in the FTA rate. Criminal FTAs increased 47% since In 2016, a record 11,291 FTAs were recorded in Salinas courtrooms an increase of over 3,600 missed court hearings per year from 2012 levels. Average Cases 10,874 11,291 Felony and misdemeanor filings have remained relatively steady over the past five fiscal years, averaging 9,918 cases per year. FTA Count 7,681 7,767 8,186 Trend Criminal filings in the latest three years are slightly lower than the longer-term average, indicating a possible declining trend. The Bottom Line Rapid growth in FTAs occurred at a time when overall criminal case filings are trending lower The annual rate increase in FTAs has varied significantly. In 2013, FTAs increased just 1.1%, while in 2015 the court experienced a 32.8% leap in the number of criminal FTAs. Growth continued in 2016 at a rate of 3.8% Increase in Criminal FTAs by Year 1.1% 5.4% % 32.8% 1/11/2018 Monterey County Superior Court

66 Criminal FTA Status Report 2 FTAS BY OFFENSE LEVEL Growth in FTAs has been uneven by offense level. Failures to appear associated with misdemeanor cases climbed rapidly since 2014, while felony FTAs peaked in 2014 before declining to levels not seen since Criminal FTAs increased every year from , an increase of 47% Highest Year The greatest single year increase was 32.8% in 2015 Felony FTAs The long-term increase in FTAs reflects a diverging trend for felonies and misdemeanors. From 2012 to 2014, felony FTAs climbed, while misdemeanor FTAs declined marks a pivotal change in the composition of FTAs by offense level. In 2015, felony FTAs declined by 11.2%, followed by an additional 21.7% in At the same time, misdemeanor FTAs surged over 50.4% in 2015 and rose an additional 9.8% in Over the long term, felony FTAs have trended lower after peaking in 2014 Misdemeanor FTAs After declining for two years, misdemeanor FTAs rose 50.4% in 2015, with growth continuing in 2016 Reducing the number of FTAs would decrease the number of warrants issued and the number of jail days served by individuals under pretrial release. Implications Over 95% of FTAs result in the issuance of a bench warrant. 1/11/2018 Monterey County Superior Court

67 Criminal FTA Status Report 3 MONTEREY COUNTY PRETRIAL TEAM STUDY Tracking and processing individuals who fail to appear for court appearances uses valuable resources. The FTA rate for initial court hearings in Monterey County Superior Court misdemeanor cases has been especially problematic. A collaborative effort of the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, Monterey County District Attorney s Office, Sheriff s Office, Probation Department, and Public Defender s Office tested text-message reminders of initial court BetaGov is a free program that promotes practicioner-led research that tests locally generated advances in education, criminal justice, health and human services. appearances for reducing FTA rates on a limited number of defendants who were cited to appear in misdemeanor cases. TRIAL DESIGN Monterey County s Pretrial Team worked with BetaGov, a program of NYU Think Tank Litmus, to design a local randomized control trial (RCT). Individuals booked and charged with a misdemeanor through the Monterey County Jail were informed about the possibility of receiving text message reminders for the initial court hearing. Approximately half of those who chose to participate were randomly selected to receive a text message reminder (intervention group) in both English and Spanish the evening before their initial court appearance. The remaining half (the control group) did not receive a text message reminder. PRELIMINARY RESULTS The Pretrial Team s Text Reminder RCT is nearly complete. Preliminary information supports the proposition that text messages are a promising method for reducing FTA rates. Key findings to date: Nearly all defendants are able to participate (have access to a cell phone and are able to understand a text message) Most defendants wanted the opportunity to receive a text and provided a valid mobile phone number Receiving a single court reminder text the evening prior to a court date improves the appearance rate Additional data provides insight into the effectiveness of receiving a text to increase court appearance rates based on specific age, gender, language, and offense type. 1/11/2018 Monterey County Superior Court

68 Criminal FTA Status Report 4 Key findings to date (Cont d.) ABILITY TO RECEIVE A TEXT MESSAGE WILLINGNESS TO RECEIVE A COURT HEARING TEXT REMINDER FTA RATE CURRENTLY 20.6% LOWER FOR THOSE RECEIVING A TEXT REMINDER Data cost is 2 cents per text This is a reminder that you have a court appearance on Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 09:30 AM Este es un recordatorio de que tiene una audiencia en la corte el jueves, enero 11, 2018 a las 09:30 AM 1/11/2018 Monterey County Superior Court