SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts

Transcription

1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Data Collection Efforts

2 2 Year 1 Planning Contracted with San Joaquin County Community Data Co-Op 10 year relationship with evaluation work Funds from one-time planning grant Identification of data collection variables Construction of AB109 data framework Training to CCP members/partner agencies Constructing AB109 logic model

3 3 FIGURE 1. AB109 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT LOGIC MODEL - DRAFT Situation Collaborative Partners Inputs Outputs/Activities Short-term outcomes Long-term outcomes Due to prison overcrowding in the State of California, the California State Assembly passed AB109. Effective October 1, 2011, this legislative bill calls for non-serious, non-violent, and non-sex offenders to be sentenced locally at the county level. These offenders are sentenced as LCS cases or Local Community Supervision and either receive straight jail time or a split sentence. In addition, as part of this process, the State of California began releasing offenders from State Prison that fell under the above definition. These individuals, referred to as PRCS or Post Release Community Supervision cases report locally to Probation who leads this realignment effort. This process also includes State parole violators. County Board of Supervisors Probation Superior Court Sheriff s Office Correctional Health Care Stockton Police Department District Attorney s Office Public Defender s Office Behavioral Health Services Human Services Agency WorkNet SJCOE FAYS All other members of the CCP Other agency partners Community members o o o o o o o o o o o o o AB109 Funding Personnel involved in or dedicated to AB109: Probation Superior Court Sheriff BHS HSA WorkNet Etc. Time AB109 Plan CCP planning, coordination, and meetings Workgroups AB109 implementation process (review, structure, steps, contacts, system) Infrastructure Assessment Center Jail and inmate housing Technology CCP meetings (Full CCP, Executive Committee, and workgroups) The processing of all AB109 cases (611 packets from State prison and LCS cases from County Jail) Local Court sentencing of AB109 cases (LCS local offenses and PRCS revocations) Day to day programming and supervision by Probation, Sheriff s Office, and Correctional Health Operation of the Assessment Center, the Day Reporting Center, and the High Risk Unit Referrals for PRCS and LCS cases to community based partners Provision of services to AB109 clients by community partners Enhancement of AB109 CCP and partner collaboration Enhancement of community supervision and systemic practices in San Joaquin County Client completion of AB109 programs (community referrals) o o Completion of EBP Decrease in recidivism Revocations Convictions Successful implementation of initial AB109 framework in San Joaquin County (after one year)

4 AB109 REALIGNMENT: DATA COLLECTION FRAMEWORK

5 5 Year 1 Funding for Data Collection Part of Year 1 Public Safety Realignment Plan Tracking data on overall approach Overall project outcomes and impact Data analysis Preparing reports Recidivism data Key informant interviews Data collection and evaluation process address: Organizational development Collaboration Evidence based principles

6 6 Initial Data Collection Challenges 8 funded agencies Multiple databases/tracking Inability to run queries Probation CMS Probation/Sheriff s Office varying timeframes Inconsistent definitions Cross referencing data

7 7 Data Reporting Solutions Created Access database All data goes to Probation Streamlining of what is reported Creation of a monthly Data Dashboard (Jan.)

8 8 Straight vs. Split Sentences San Joaquin County Public Safety Reallignment January 1, March 31, 2012 Reported To Probation Straight Sentences Split Sentences LCS PRCS PRCS expected 70 60% 69% 57% 31 50% 24 40% % 50% 43% Jan Feb March Total % % 77% Jan Feb March Total Jail Impact P R CS/L CS R evocations F iled Jan Feb March Total Initial FTR Subsequent FTR Other Return To Custody LCS/PRCS Processed 3056 Processed Total AB109's Processed January February March January February March Total w/o new charges 3056 w/ new charges PRCS w/o new charges PRCS w/ new charges LCS w/o new charges LCS w/ new charges

9 9 San Joaquin County Public Safety Realignment April 1, June 30, 2012 Straight vs. Split Sentences Reported To Probation Straight Sentences Split Sentences LCS PRCS PRCS expected 53 68% 30 77% % % April May June Total % April May June Total Jail Impact P R CS/L CS R evocations F iled A pril May June Total Initial FTR Subsequent FTR Other Return To Custody LCS/PRCS Processed 3056 Processed Total AB109's Processed April May June April May June Total w/o new charges w/ new charges PRCS w/o new charges PRCS w/ new charges LCS w/o new charges LCS w/ new charges

10 AB109: PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT IN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY A Preliminary Evaluation Report: The Situation, Response, and Impact Prepared By: San Joaquin Community Data Co-Op Phone: Fax: cbullock@sjgov.org

11 11 Implementation Success One of first in State with Year 1 Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors Overall collaboration and partnership (including State Parole) Improved communication Changes in policies/procedures/practices Creation of new programs

12 12 Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) From October 2011 through March 2012 A total of 536 PRCS cases were released 419 reported to the Assessment Center 95 initially failed to report 22 others (ICE holds, new charges, out-of-county)

13 13 PRCS Cases and Ethnicity Race Count Percent American Indian 4 0.7% Asian % Black % Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2 0.4% Hispanic % White % Other 7 1.3%

14 14 PRCS Assessment Risk Level 56.7% of all PRCS offenders are at high risk of reoffending for a violent crime

15 15 PRCS Arrests Arresting Agency Count Percent CA Parole 1 0.2% CHP 4 0.7% Delta College PD 1 0.2% Lodi PD 7 1.3% Manteca PD 2 0.4% Sacramento County 1 0.2% San Joaquin County SO % Stockton PD % SUSD PD 2 0.4% Tracy PD 2 0.4% 71 (13%) of the PRCS offenders were arrested for new crimes

16 16 Preliminary Recidivism Data Based on CPOC s definition of conviction of new arrest. 5 out of 536 PRCS cases (less than 1%) 0 out of 29 LCS cases released from County Jail 3-tiered Recidivism Report (at one year) Technical violation Arrest for new crime Conviction of new crime

17 17 Local Community Supervision (LCS) From October 2011 through March 2012 A total of 278 cases 171 (61.5%) were split sentences 107 (38.5% were straight sentences The average sentence was three years The longest sentence was 8 years Only 29 have been released from County Jail

18 18 County Jail The County Jail processed 1217 AB109 offenders 1099 were parole violators (90.3%) 350 inmates who were released from custody during the first six months returned to custody for either a revocation or new crime 362 AB109 inmates received in-custody programming GED (160) Ownership (90) Life Skills (39) Office Technology (38)

19 19 Correctional Health Care Services Service Type Total Health Assessments 988 Prescriptions Filled 6251 On-site CHC Clinics 231 Dental 68 SJGH Clinics 52 Emergency Room 13 SJGH Hospitalized Inmates 9 AB109 offenders in custody hit a high of 366 in March, which represented approximately 29% of the jail population.

20 20 High Risk Unit 278 active cases by the end of March Additional 60 with outstanding Bench Warrants

21 21 Day Reporting Center 86 cases were referred in first 6-months Ages ranged from (average age 29.7) 86% were male 14% were female 2/3 rd of the cases were assessed as high-violent 4 offenders did not complete DRC Revocation (2) New Local Prison Sentence (1) Transfer to High Risk Unit (1)

22 DRC Clients Top 3 Risk Factors 22

23 23 DRC Referrals Type of Referrals Number Percent Drug/Alcohol % Job Readiness 2 2.3% Education % Re-referred to Education 3 3.5% MRT Evidence Based Program %

24 24 Post Release Supervision Re-Entry Court 100% 80% 66.7% 74.1% 68.4% 60% 40% 20% 0% Compliance with the provider Compliance with the case manager Compliance with the judge 27 offenders were referred since the program s implementation in in mid-january.

25 25 Post Release Supervision Re-Entry Court 92.3% were referred to substance abuse programs 12 clients in residential treatment 12 clients in out-patient treatment

26 26 Behavioral Health Services 156 AB109 offenders were assessed 151 PRCS/5 LCS Clients were assessed an average of 4.3 days after being referred 25 clients had a medication assessment

27 27 Human Services Agency Type of Services Number of clients General Assistance 151 Food Stamp Employment Training (FSET) 117 Medical 1 Cal Fresh 130 Cash Aid 0 Average General Assistance voucher was $47.48 Average Cal Fresh Allotment was $136.14

28 Human Services Agency 28

29 29 WorkNet 165 AB109 offenders were referred 26 clients participated in workshops

30 30 WorkNet 14 clients secured their I-9 right to work documents 6 clients had secured a job in the first 6-months Electronic Installer Trainee (2) General Labor (2) Auto body and repair trainee (1) Packager (1)

31 31 San Joaquin County Office of Education 19 clients had taken part in One.Canlis through the Day Reporting Center 85 clients enrolled in GED classes while at the County Jail 8 clients completed their GED testing

32 32 Future Evaluations Efforts Longitudinal tracking of outcomes including recidivism data Focus on what services might affect recidivism risk level, employment status, housing status, substance abuse issues, mental health issues Evaluation work centering on cost-effectiveness Key informant interviews Collection and analysis of police crime data

33 33 Next Steps Review of preliminary findings Updating Needs Assessment/Gaps in Services Submitting/Reviewing Year 2 Program Proposals Executive Committee to vote on funding proposals and Year 2 Plan Board Approval of Year 2 Plan