ONLINE BENCHMARKING AND DATA VISUALIZATION TOOL

Transcription

1 Request for Proposals ONLINE BENCHMARKING AND DATA VISUALIZATION TOOL The International Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc. 44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 2 Alexandria, VA July 214 Tool 1

2 Summary The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) seeks to partner with a qualified vendor to create an online benchmarking and data visualization tool for law enforcement agencies use in conducting comparative analyses with peer agencies. About the IACP The IACP is the world s leading association of law enforcement executives with over 2, members from around the world. In addition to chiefs of police and law enforcement personnel of other ranks, IACP members include city and county managers, criminal justice researchers, university faculty, and members of many other professions. The IACP was founded in 1893 to encourage cooperation and exchange of information among police administrators, and to promote the highest standards of performance and conduct within the police profession. Headquarters staff comprises approximately 1 professionals engaged in a variety of activities, from grant management and research to training and technical assistance, all designed to advance leadership and professionalism in policing. Project Background The notion of a nationwide platform for comparative police performance analytics is borne out of the IACP s Midsize Agencies Section, a progressive group of nearly 3 police executives from jurisdictions ranging in population from 5, to 5,, and inspired by the Overland Park, Kansas, Police Department Benchmark Cities Survey. Benchmark Cities Survey. In 1997, then-overland Park, Kansas, Police Chief John Douglass sought a way to compare his department with other similarly situated and resourced departments. Working with City Hall and the local Chamber of Commerce, he identified more than two dozen comparable cities and began what has since evolved into the Benchmark Cities (BMC) Survey. The survey, updated annually, provides a broad range of information about each of the participating departments, including agency demographics, resources, crime, arrests, and traffic data. With that information, participating agencies can set better goals and objectives, and compare their performance in various areas. The survey results are posted to the Overland Park, Kansas, website each fall in a series of PowerPoint slides that are highly anticipated by participants, researchers, and the media: IACP Midsize Agencies Section. Chief Douglass championed the idea of nationalizing the survey during his tenure as chairperson of the IACP s Midsize Agencies Section. The majority of departments participating in the Benchmark Cities Survey are also active members of the IACP Midsize Agencies Section. Expanding the Benchmark Cities Survey concept to a broader national IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 1

3 audience became goal of the Section, led by Chief Douglass and a subcommittee devoted to this task. Grant Funding. IACP staff works closely with the Section to advance its goals. To that end, in 213, IACP was awarded funding from the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (the COPS Office) to develop an online nationwide benchmarking and data visualization tool, market its availability to the law enforcement community, provide technical assistance to agencies using the tool, and conduct analysis and follow-up on the resulting global data set. The vision is to create an online nationwide benchmarking and data visualization tool that would serve not only as a means for individual agencies to make performance comparisons, but also a source of promising community policing strategies to benefit the field. Objectives / Scope of Work The IACP seeks a qualified firm to adapt the existing Benchmark Cities Survey data collection instrument into a secure online environment where participating agencies can Create secure online profiles Input data for a variety of variables (see examples in Table 1) and/or import from external sources Receive a recommended list of peer cities based on data input Self-select / identify comparable jurisdictions and benchmarking factors/variables View the benchmark results in a series of easy to interpret and visually appealing graphics (charts, graphs, tables) Export benchmark results and data in.pdf and/or.xls or similar Connect with and contact other participating agencies, either through an integrated forum (preferred) or externally (sharing of contact information) Perform comparable analytics (i.e., compare their jurisdiction to the average results of benchmarked cities) The number, type, and complexity of variables to be collected and benchmarked is not yet finalized. The selected vendor will work collaboratively with IACP staff and BMC/Midsize subject matter experts to define and standardize benchmark variables. The existing Benchmark Cities Survey includes more than 2 discrete data points, too many to logically include in a nationwide online solution. (See attachment I for a sample of the current BMC data collection instrument.) IACP staff categorized the existing survey questions and asked current BMC participants and Midsize Section members to rate the importance of each category on a scale of one to five: 1 = not important for a national survey; 5 = very important. The results are summarized in Table 1, below. IACP will focus on and prioritize those categories identified as most important by our stakeholders for inclusion in the nationwide online survey. IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 2

4 Table 1: Types of Benchmark Questions, by Importance Question Category (examples) City Demographics (population, age, ethnicity, square miles, median income, home value, education level, unique features (major university, stadium, airport, etc) Avg Importance 4.91 Workload - Calls For Service (total calls, avg response time, # calls by category) 4.78 Department Demographics (# sworn and non-sworn by race, gender, age, rank, education level, assignment) 4.75 Crime Statistics (breakdown by Part I, Part II overall and by crime) 4.72 Budget information (city budget, police budget, incl personnel, training, overtime) 4.66 Clearance Rates (arrest breakdown by Part I, Part II overall and by crime, juvenile and adult) 4.63 Use of Force Deployments (by type, frequency) 4.44 Officer Safety (OTJ injuries, vest-wear policies, on duty crashes) 4.38 Internal Affairs (citizen and internal complaints, founded, unfounded, etc) 4.13 Crime Analysis (staffing, types of analysis) 4.13 Traffic Crashes & Citations (# and types, causes) 4. Training (hours in-service, external by category) 3.84 Fleet (total miles driven, replacement criteria, take home cars) 3.69 Alarms (ordinance, verified response, # false alarm responses) 3.41 K-9 (# dogs, unit assigned, yrs experience, apprehensions credited to) 3.38 Property & Property Room (total $ stolen/recovered, # items in/out) 3.38 The solution should be flexible enough to accommodate Clear definitions of data requested to ensure a standardized, apples to apples comparison The addition of new categories of questions as needed in the future (i.e., scalable) IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 3

5 Multiple years worth of data for historical comparisons across years A core set of required data, augmented by a more detailed, optional set. Interactivity i.e., the ability to click on and off comparable jurisdictions and variables. Free form narrative block for comments, annotations, etc. An unlimited number of users Basic analytics (comparing straight numbers, as well as averages, standard deviation, etc.) To the extent which funding allows, the IACP would like to explore the possibility of importing data from external sources (e.g., FBI UCR, U.S. Census, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Education, Department of Transportation, and departmental computer aided dispatch and records management systems) Budget As a grant funded initiative, limited funds are available to achieve the desired result. We have budgeted $5, for the items requested in this RFP. Co-Branding / Sponsorship. Partnering with the IACP to develop an online police performance benchmarking tool may represent an opportunity for some vendors to showcase broader technologies and services they offer that may be of interest to police agencies or their parent jurisdictions. The IACP will entertain proposals where our budget is maximized through a co-branded partnership option. Timeline The IACP hopes to award a contract by September 15, 214. The online benchmarking and data visualization tool should be complete and integrated into the IACP website ( by October 1, 215. Ideally, a beta version would be available in time for the 215 annual BMC meeting and 215 Midsize Agencies Section midyear meeting. Both are typically held in the spring. Technical Requirements Vendors should provide information regarding how they will address the following: - Section 58 - As a federally funded endeavor, the tool must be meet the minimum level of accessibility set forth in the Section 58 Technology Standards. - Site Hosting - The tool should seamlessly integrate into the existing IACP website, either linked to and hosted separately or through the provision of code or files to the IACP for uploading to the site. IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 4

6 - Security - Data should be secure, owned by the IACP, and accessible only to those participating in / contributing to the system - User authentication The vendor should propose a method of validating users and limiting access to law enforcement agency personnel Vendor Evaluation Criteria Upon the closing date of this RFP, the IACP will review the responses based on each vendor s ability to meet the overall objective and each of the criteria outlined above. Finalists may be invited to demonstrate or discuss their solutions. The IACP may contact current users of the vendor s solution to evaluate its performance in an actual production environment and to obtain user feedback. Upon completion of the demonstrations and such further evaluation as deemed necessary, the IACP may determine, at its sole discretion, not to select a vendor and to initiate another search at a future date. IACP may also, at its sole discretion, award components of the process to different vendors. Vendor Submission Requirements Vendors responding to this RFP must submit the following information. Responses should be limited to 15 pages, but ancillary literature, such as marketing materials and team-member resumes, can be included as attachments. The IACP will assume no costs for the preparation of the requested information. Submission requirements include: A narrative description of the proposed solution(s) addressing the desired objectives and technical requirements above. A description of the vendor's organization, methodology, and support, including number of years in business, total staff size, experience levels and length of service of staff, etc. Indicate the amount of experience you have working with associations. A description and explanation of the vendor's implementation strategy, to include a breakdown of the various tasks, implementation timeline, support, etc. The contact information for a minimum of three current users of the vendor s solution whose requirements closely resemble those of the IACP. Costs associated with the proposed solution, including maintenance Resumes for proposed project team members. IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 5

7 All vendor responses will be used solely for the purposes described herein. Requests for Interpretation of the RFP All questions and requests for clarification or interpretation of the meaning of the RFP, and any other correspondence concerning the RFP, should be directed to: Tracy Phillips The IACP reserves the right to share any information given as a result of a response or clarification with all other vendors responding to the RFP. Deadline for Submission of Responses Complete vendor responses must be received at the IACP Headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, no later than 5pm EDT on August 8, 214. Vendors may arrange for hand-delivery, deliver their responses electronically, or use mail or delivery services, provided that the submission is received by the deadline regardless of mailing date. Proposal files submitted via attachment should not exceed 1MB. Address and contact information is provided below: Jenny Gargano IACP 44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 2 Alexandria, VA (fax) gargano@theiacp.org Vendor demonstrations, reference checks, etc., if required by the IACP, will occur in August 214. Type of Contract It is the IACP s intent to avail itself of the most favorable terms and conditions it can negotiate. It is the IACP s intent to award a contract based on proposed time and cost estimates that stipulate that the vendor assumes responsibility for the completeness and performance of its work product. This Request for Proposal, any written materials altering the Request for Proposal, the vendor s initial response and all addenda to that response may be incorporated as part of the contract. IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 6

8 As recipients of federal funds, the IACP must meet certain requirements outlined by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. We are also responsible of assuring that any subcontractors also comply with all of the applicable Federal regulations. Prospective vendors should be willing to enter into contract with the IACP that certifies compliance with the applicable requirements. Reservation of Rights This Request for Proposal does not commit the IACP to award a contract or pay for any cost incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal. The IACP reserves the right to waive or modify any particular requirement(s) in this RFP, with or without notice and with or without cause, to accept any proposals, and to reject any and all proposals and to call for new proposals. IACP - RFP Online Benchmarking and Data Visualization Tool 7

9 ATTACHMENT I: Sample of the current Benchmark Cities data collection instrument 21 Benchmark City Survey "A Coalition for Mutual Support" Agency Responses (213 Data) Please use calendar year 213 data when responding to the survey questions. Please provide a response for every question, even if that response is, "unknown or not tracked." Do not use "N/A" as a response. 4 City Name 5 Chief's Name 6 Chief's Phone Number 7 Chief's 8 Chief's Mailing Address 9 City, ST, ZIP 1 Survey POC 11 POC Phone 12 POC 13 City & Department Demographics 14 City Population 15 What Percentage of your population is: Note: Population percentages must equal 1% 16 White 17 African American 18 Asian 19 Other 2 Ethnicity: What percentage of your population claims Hispanic ethnicity? 21 City Size - Square Miles 22 Lane Miles - What is the number of lane miles in your jurisdiction? Note: One lane mile = one traffic lane one mile in length. Include only paved streets within the City Limits. % 23 City Budget Note: Use General Funds only. 24 Police Budget Note: Use General Funds only. 25 Training portion of budget Note: Training budget includes a combination of actual training costs and related staff (overhead) costs. 26 Personnel portion of budget Note: Include salary and benefits only. 27 Personnel is what percentage of the Department's Budget? Note this figure is #DIV/! automatically calculated. 28 What percentage of the Personnel Budget is paid as Overtime 29 What is the average salary increase (decrease) per civilian employee? Note: show a decrease as (3%) 3 What is the average salary increase (decrease) per officer? Note: show a decrease as (3%) 31 Employee Layoffs If you had to layoff employees in calendar year 21, what was the number of layoffs by category civilian / officer? 32 Civilian Employee layoffs 33 Officer layoffs 34 Are your Commissioned Officers Unionized (Yes/No) No 35 Authorized Strength Note: This field is automatically calculated based on your input in lines 36 and 37 below. 36 Sworn (Note: Do not include jail positions) 37 Non-Sworn Note: Include full-time equivalents. 38 Assigned Sworn by category Note: This field is automatically calculated based on your input in lines below. 39 White male 4 African American male 41 Hispanic male 42 Asian male 43 Other male 44 White female 45 African American female 46 Hispanic female 47 Asian female 48 Other female 49 Assigned Non-Sworn by category Note: This field is automatically calculated based on your input in lines 5-59 below. 5 White male 51 African American male 52 Hispanic male 53 Asian male 54 Other male 55 White female 56 African American female

10 57 Hispanic female 58 Asian female 59 Other female 6 Commissioned Officers by job function 61 What is the authorized strength of sworn officer positions in any rank of First Line Supervisor or above? 62 What is the authorized strength of sworn officer positions below the rank of First Line Supervisor? 63 Total sworn strength Note: this figure will be calculated for you. It is the sum of the two preceeding questions and MUST equal your response in line # 36 above (Authorized Strength - Sworn) 64 What is the authorized strength of First Responder positions? What is the authorized strength of First Responder positions? First Responder positions are defined as sworn police officer positions in any rank below the rank of First Line Supervisor assigned to any nof the following units: Community Oriented Policing; Emergency Response Units; K-9; Patrol; School Respource Officers; Traffic. 65 What is the ratio of First Responder positions to staff officer positions? Staff officer positions are defined as any sworn officer position regardless of rank that is not a First Responder position as defined above. Note: No response is necessary - this ratio will be calculated for you. 66 What is the breakout of authorized sworn officer positions by rank? Note: Please categorize your authorized sworn officer positions into any of the following categories (lines 67-7). The sum of lines 67-7 is shown to the right and MUST equal your response in line # 36 (Authorized Strength - Sworn) 67 Executive Level (Chief and 2 steps below) 68 Mid Level (Ranks 3 steps below the Chief to one step above First Line Supervisor) 69 First Line Supervisor 7 Line Officer (All ranks below First Line Supervisor) 71 What is the breakout of authorized civilian positions by rank? Note: Please categorize your authorized civilian positions into either of the following categories (lines 72-73). The sum of lines is shown to the right and MUST equal your response in line # 37 (Authorized Strength - Non-Sworn) 72 Civilian - First Line Supervisor or above 73 Civilian - Employee (All ranks below First Line Supervisor) 74 What is the breakout of authorized sworn officer positions by function? Note: Please categorize your authorized sworn officer positions into any of the following categories (lines 75-96). For positions serving multiple functional areas, place them in the area where they spend the majority of their time. Do not include positions assigned to jail duties. The sum of lines is shown to the right and MUST equal your response in line #36 (Authorized Strength - Sworn) 75 Comand Staff (Division Commanders and above) 76 Communications 77 Community Oriented Policing 78 Crime Analysis 79 Crime Prevention 8 DARE or equivilent program 81 Emergency Response Units (full time SWAT, EOD, Water Rescue, etc.) 82 Evidence Technician/Crime Lab 83 Intelligence 84 Investigations 85 K-9 Unit 86 Narcotics 87 Patrol 88 Personnel (hiring, polygraph, background, etc.) 89 Professional Standards/Internal Affairs Unit 9 Property Room 91 Records 92 School Resource Officers 93 Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force 94 Traffic 95 Training (fulltime training staff and academy instructors) 96 All Other (to include Administration) 97 Minorities and Women in Staff Positions Includes Sergeant & above and civilian equivalents 98 Minorities 99 Female 1 Graduates What is the number of graduates from the following institutions assigned to your department: Note: this field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines below. 11 FBI Academy 12 Southern Police Institute 13 SLEI, Command Course 14 Other Command Schools 15 Northwestern Univ., Traffic Institute 16 General Section

11 17 Citizen Complaints Total Citizen complaints are defined as a citizen s concern/complaint directed at a department employee s actions that may be a violation of policy, procedure, or code of ethics and is turned over to an internal affairs unit for investigation. Note: this field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines & Sworn 19 Founded Founded means evidence shows the officer was at fault. 11 Unfounded Unfounded means evidence shows the officer was NOT at fault. 111 Not Substantiated Not Substantiated means evidence shows the claim has no merit/didn t happen. 112 Currently Under Investigation 113 Non-sworn 114 Founded Note: Founded means evidence shows the officer was at fault. 115 Unfounded Unfounded means evidence shows the officer was NOT at fault. 116 Not Substantiated Not Substantiated means evidence shows the claim has no merit/didn t happen. 117 Currently Under Investigation 118 Internal Complaints Total Internal complaints are defined as a department employee s concern/complaint directed at another department employee s actions that may be a violation of policy, procedure, or code of ethics and is turned over to an internal affairs unit for investigation. Note: this field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines & Sworn 12 Founded Founded means evidence shows the officer was at fault. 121 Unfounded Unfounded means evidence shows the officer was NOT at fault. 122 Not Substantiated Not Substantiated means evidence shows the claim has no merit/didn t happen. 123 Currently Under Investigation 124 Non-sworn 125 Founded Founded means evidence shows the officer was at fault. 126 Unfounded Unfounded means evidence shows the officer was NOT at fault. 127 Not Substantiated Not Substantiated means evidence shows the claim has no merit/didn t happen. 128 Currently Under Investigation 129 Complaints against officers by type 13 What are the top three types of citizen complaints against officers? (See lines below) Include all parts of a citizen's complaint. For example if during a single incident, a citizen complained that an officer was "disrespectful" and used excessive force you will count one complaint for unprofessional conduct and one complaint for excessive force. 131 # # # Response To Resistance 135 What is the number of deployments of each of these levels of force? (See lines ). Note: count the number of incidents, not the number of officers involved in the incident. Example if 5 officers are involved in a single incident involving the use of lethel force you would only report 1, not 5 deployments of lethal force. 136 Precautionary Force: Weapon displayed in presence of suspect 137 Verbal Direction 138 Empty Hand Control 139 Intermediate Weapon: Chemical, etc. 14 Impact Weapon: Primary or alternate i.e. stun gun, Taser, nightstick, ASP, etc. 141 Lethal Force: Use of a firearm or any force which has a reasonable likelihood of causing death or serious physical harm. 142 What is the number of Taser deployments by catagory? (See lines below). 143 Taser display 144 Taser use 145 What is the number of adverse reactions to Taser deployments? 146 Provide any anicdotal information on adverse reactions to Taser deployments 147 K-9 Data (See lines below). 148 What is the number of assigned police dogs 149 What is the average years of experience for assigned police dogs. 15 What is the number of dog bites by assigned police dogs 151 What is the number of apprehensions credited to assigned police dogs 152 What is the number of drug finds (positive hits) by assigned police Dogs 153 What is the number of bomb searches by assigned police dogs? 154 Total Calls for Service Note: Include only calls where someone telephoned to request police response. Do not include officer-initiated calls. 155 Median Response Time - Priority I Calls (response time is displayed in fractions of minutes. Example: 5.75 = 5 minutes and 45 seconds.) Note: Priority I Calls are defined as: Those public safety calls that require the immediate presence of a law enforcement officer in order to protect individuals from injury of life-threatening situations or other emergency situations that require and depend upon an immediate response. Response time includes the minutes and seconds from the time the call is received by dispatch to the time the officer arrives on scene.

12 156 Target Response Time - Priority I Calls What is your agency's target response time? (displayed in fractions of minutes) Example: 5.75 = 5 minutes and 45 seconds. 157 Top Five Calls For Service by Type (lines below) 158 #1 159 #2 16 #3 161 #4 162 #5 163 Annual Training What is the average number of training hours received annually per each officer by category? Note: this field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines 164 & 165 below. 164 In-House Training (Average # of hours per Officer) Note: In-house includes classroom and hands-on training. 165 Formal Training (Average # of hours per Officer) Note: Formal includes all outside training regardless of what agency sponsored or hosted the training. 166 Total $ stolen (excluding vehicles) 167 Total $ recovered (excluding vehicles) 168 Total $ stolen (vehicles) 169 Total $ recovered (vehicles) 17 Total Traffic Crashes Note: Include only public property traffic crashes. 171 Fatality Traffic Crashes Note: Include only public property traffic crashes. 172 Injury Traffic Crashes Note: Include only public property traffic crashes. 173 Non-Injury Traffic Crashes Note: Include only public property traffic crashes. 174 Alcohol Related Fatality Traffic Crashes Note: Include only public property traffic crashes. 175 What is the percentage of all traffic crashes that resulted in the issuance of a traffic citation? 176 What are the top three primary causes for all traffic crashes? (i.e.: speed, alcohol, inattention, etc.) (See lines below) 177 #1 178 #2 179 #3 18 Traffic Citations This field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines 181 & 182 below. 181 Non-Moving Violations 182 Moving Violations This field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines below. 183 Alcohol (arrests and/or citations) 184 Speed 185 Failure to Comply with Traffic Control Device (Red Light Violations) 186 Other moving violations 187 Does your agency use Red Light Cameras? (Yes/No) 188 Top three causes of on-the-job officer injuries? Note: injuries could be related to a variety of causes such as traffic accident, training, accidental weapon discharge, etc. (See lines below) 189 #1 19 #2 191 #3 192 Total miles driven by department patrol vehicles 193 What is your patrol vehicle replacement criteria (mileage, age, etc)? 194 On-Duty Officer Involved Traffic Crashes This field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines 195 & 196 below. 195 At fault 196 Not at fault 197 Burglar alarm ordinance (Yes / No) Does your jurisdiction have an alarm ordinance? 198 Verified Response (Yes / No) Does your jurisdiction require verified response? Note: Verified Response" is defined as: requiring the alarm company to verify (through a telephone call, video surveillance, or onsite inspection) that the alarm signal is valid before an officer will be dispatched to investigate. 199 Suspension of police response (Yes / No) Is suspension of police response allowed under your ordinance? 2 Suspension allowed after how many alarms? 21 Total # alarm users 22 Total # false alarm responses False Alarms" are defined as: An alarm activation where the responding offices found no evidence of actual or suspected criminal activity. Note: Count only responses where the officers actually responded to the scene, not cancelled alarms. 23 Crime Analysis 24 Does your agency have a ful-time crime analysis unit? (yes / no) 25 If yes, what division is it assigned to? 26 If yes, how many analysts do you have? 27 If yes, is the unit staffed with civilians, commissioned officers, or both? 28 If yes,what types of analysis do they do? Check all that apply. (Lines below) 29 Tactical 21 Strategic 211 Administrative 212 Property Room

13 213 Staffing - How many employees are assigned to your Property Room? This field is automatically calculated based on your responses in lines 214 & 215 below. 214 Civilian 215 Commissioned 216 Work Load - How many items flowed through the Property Room? The total number displayed at the right is the sum of your responses in lines below. 217 Number of items taken in 218 Number of items released to owner 219 Number of items released for court 22 Number of items destroyed or disposed of 221 Crime Statistics 222 Part I Total Includes Aggravated Assault/battery, Arson, Auto Theft, Burglary, Homicide, Rape, Robbery, and Theft. Please use UCR reporting format. If you can't use UCR indicate that in a Remark (lines ). 223 Part I Violent Includes Aggravated Assault/battery, Homicide, Rape, and Robbery 224 Part I Property Includes Arson, Auto Theft, Burglary, and Theft 225 Part II Total 226 Aggravated Assault/Battery 227 Arson 228 Burglary (Commercial & Residential) 229 Domestic Violence 23 Fraud/Forgery 231 Homicide 232 Rape 233 Robbery 234 Sex Offenses (not Rape) 235 Theft (Auto) 236 Theft (From Motor Vehicle) 237 Theft (Not Auto Theft or From Motor Vehicle) Report all Thefts if unable to break out 238 Vandalism 239 Clearance Rates Note: Clearance is defined as cleared by arrest or lack of prosecution. Unfounded or lack of jurisdiction are not counted as they are subtracted from the # of crimes reported. Clearance rate is equal to the # cleared divided by the # reported. 24 Part I Total Includes Aggravated Assault/battery, Arson, Auto Theft, Burglary, Homicide, Rape, Robbery, and Theft 241 Part I Violent Includes Aggravated Assault/battery, Homicide, Rape, and Robbery 242 Part I Property Includes Arson, Auto Theft, Burglary, and Theft 243 Part II Total 244 Aggravated Assault/Battery 245 Arson 246 Burglary (Commercial & Residential) 247 Domestic Violence 248 Fraud/Forgery 249 Homicide 25 Rape 251 Robbery 252 Sex Offenses (not Rape) 253 Theft (Auto) 254 Theft (From Motor Vehicle) 255 Theft (Not Auto Theft or From Motor Vehicle) Report all Thefts if unable to break out 256 Vandalism 257 Grant Programs Provide Grant information for your three most recent grant awards. Please include complete name of the grant source. 258 Source 259 Amount 26 Purpose Source 263 Amount 264 Purpose Source 267 Amount 268 Purpose Remarks Place any remarks here that you feel will help explain your response to any given survey question. Please be specific and identify the question (Line #) you are commenting on. 271 Remark # Remark # Remark # Remark # Remark # Remark # Remark # Remark # 8

14 279 Remark # 9 28 Remark # Remark # Remark # Suggestions for next year's survey Please list any additions, deletions or changes (clarifications) you would like to see on next year's survey. 285 Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # 5 29 Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion # Suggestion #