Putting Innovation into Practice
|
|
- Nicholas Bryant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Putting Innovation into Practice Connections 2015 Paul Works TRADOC Analysis Center Fort Leavenworth (TRAC-FLVN)
2 Purpose and Outline Purpose: Provide an overview for how agencies successfully move ideas into practice: accomplishing innovation. Outline Introduction and Innovation Basics. Examples: Ideas Innovations. Arsenal Ship. C3 Driver. Irregular Warfare Tactical Wargame. Synthetic Staff Ride: Mindanao. Lessons Identified/Lessons Learned. 28 July 2015 Putting Innovation into Practice 2
3 Introduction and Innovation Basics Buzzword: Innovation. Widely used and referenced in media, literature, academia, commercial businesses, and governments. Innovation as a concept can be powerful. Overuse dilutes its meaning. Its application to conceal lack of substance can be disingenuous. When used to structure an organizational mindset it can enable a flexible workforce and a corporate capability to respond to current and future challenges. Continually introduces new ideas or ways of thinking, then translates them into action to solve specific problems or seize new opportunities. Innovation can be loosely categorized into three levels. Incremental. Small changes to processes or products. Breakthrough. Change giving customers something new. Transformational. Transforms the way work is done. Rare. There are nearly always risk-aversion inhibitions. Why change what works? Perceived impacts on credibility and reputation. Problem Solving / Innovation Continuum At the core of innovation is the need to improve or change a product, process, or service. Innovation responds to that need. 28 July 2015 Putting Innovation into Practice 3
4 Example 1: Arsenal Ship Arsenal Ship USN and DARPA Joint Program Office. Non-ACAT, acquisition reform, demonstration project. Description. Vertical Launch Weapons Army Tactical Missile System Standard Missile Tomahawk Land Attack Missile Vertical Gun for Advanced Ships Low observable, carrier-sized platform, manned by approximately 50 personnel, that would carry up to 500 vertical launch tubes for power projection and air-defense operations. Controlled via Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) (+) network. Wargaming Use. Weapons and Tactics Analysis Center (WEPTAC), NAWC-WD, China Lake, CA. Down-selected industry teams applied their system and CONOPS against operational requirements using the WEPTAC II wargame simulation. USN, USA, and USMC participants. Ideas. Multiple solutions presented to meet operational requirements. Sophisticated, multi-agent asset control (sensor-to-shooter); to any echelon, to any service. Weapon control and launch authorization responsibilities, operator out-of-the-loop. Maintenance handled via reach-back web connectivity. Defense requirements vs. information warfare (now called cyber). Ideas Innovations. Concepts informed numerous follow-on efforts. Sensor-to-shooter: SSBN to SSGN conversion, UCAV, US-UK Sensor-to-Shooter. Operator out-of-loop, weapon control, SA requirements, reach-back: FCS, BCT technologies. Network-centric enabling capabilities, and vulnerabilities: Patriot, CEC. ACAT Acquisition Category FCS Future Combat System UCAV Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle BCT Brigade Combat System NAWC-WD Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division USA U.S. Army DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency SSBN Ballistic Missile Submarine USMC U.S. Marine Corps 28 CONOPS July 2015 Concept of Operations SSGN Guided Missile Submarine USN U.S. NavyPutting Innovation into Practice 4
5 Example 2: C3 Driver Command, Control, and Communications (C3) Driver (to present). PEO-STRI and ATEC. Description. Objective: Consolidate the sim / stim / test environment that exists at the CTSF to support ABCS development, integration, test, and certification. Wargaming Use. Joint and Combined Operations Directorate, TRAC-FLVN. JANUS, OneSAF, and MAPEXes used to develop common test scenarios. Ideas. Scenarios require structured [doctrinal] message traffic (mission/message threads) to define ABCS box stimulation and message traffic. Establish single agency for consolidated ABCS functionality requirements. Sophisticated GUI and technology can meet functionality requirements; 14 components, 1 box. Ideas Innovations. Ideas revolutionized how ABCS/battle command system testing is accomplished and enabled system-of-system (SoS) improvements. Doctrinal-based mission/message threads established a full SoS test process. TPIO-BC (later AIMD) established as single-agency test requirements definer. SoS test requirements forced common message formats across all ABCS systems. The C3 Driver system enables a single test officer to plan, execute, monitor, and assess tests. Visual and digital SA on messaging led to modified inter- and intra-toc SoS network structures. ABCS Army Battle Command System GUI Graphical Use Interface PEO-STRI Program Executive Office for AIMD Architecture Integration and Management Div. MAPEX Map Exercise Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation ATEC Army Test and Evaluation Command OneSAF One Semi-Automated Force TPIO-BC TRADOC Program Integration Office - 28 CTSF July 2015Whitfill Central Test Support Facility SWB Software Blocking Battle Putting Command Innovation into Practice 5
6 Example 3: IW Tactical Wargame Irregular Warfare Tactical Wargame (IW TWG) (+) TRADOC Analysis Center + 12 key partners (CNA, OSD CAPE, HSCB). Description. Objective: Create an analytic capability to inform decisions concerning operations in an IW operating environment - how to change, how to invest in change, how to conduct operations, and how to measure impacts. Wargaming Use. TRADOC Analysis Center, SAC/OSD CAPE, CNA, ANL, TRISA, UC Davis, CRA, Texas A&M, NPS, and others developed the IW TWG. Applied IW TWG to support studies, and inform development. Ideas. We can build a tactical wargame (initially, analog) that can show impacts IW TWG Components PAVE CG Model OWA Oz II/III Nexus IESE Model IES Model SAF Model MISO Planning Tool across a range of measures when applying changes systems, organizations, and TTP. We can identify many of the best experts in the field and can leverage their products. Ideas Innovations. Successfully developed the IW TWG, informed other efforts. Directly informed two studies: Civil Affairs at the tactical level. CoIST impacts. Informed two other model development efforts: Athena and COEM. Concepts led to IW LOE/PMESII states-vector and entity cognition research. Army V&V process developed for representing Social science (theory) representations. Operational Wrap-Around (OWA) leveraged for application as a leadership development tool. ANL Argonne National Labs IES Infrastructure and Essential Services PAVE Planning, Adjudication, Visualization Environment CG Cultural Geography IESE Infrastructure, Essential Services, and Economics PMESII Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, CNA Center for Naval Analyses LOE Lines of Effort and Information COEM Complex Operational Environment Model MISO Military Information Support Operations SAC Simulation Analysis Center CoIST Company Intelligence Support Team NPS Naval Post Graduate School SAF Semi-Automated Force CRA Charles River Analytics OSD CAPE Office of the Secretary of Defense Cost TRISA TRADOC G2 Intelligence Support Activity 28 HSCB July 2015 Human, Social, Culture, Behavior Program Assessment and Program Evaluation TTP Tactics, Techniques, Putting Innovation Procedures into Practice 6
7 Example 4: SSR Mindanao Synthetic Staff Ride (SSR): Mindanao. TRAC. Description. Boardgame representing a current-day, complex operating environment (OE) in the Philippines. Wargaming Use. TRAC, CNA, CGSC, and the MCBL designed and developed the SSR: Mindanao. Development support provided by ARI, NPS, TRISA, and UFMCS. Leveraged knowledge of extant wargame/boardgame components and mechanics. Ideas. Provide operational unit staffs (in garrison) and Army students with a wargaming tool that: A. Introduces the participants to a complex Phase 0/1 OE. B. Challenges the participants to understand and navigate the environment. C. Provides leaders, instructors, and participants with insights into ADP 6-22 leadership competencies and attributes. Wargame should enable experiential applications similar to previous Fulda Gap sand tables. Ideas Innovations. Used the SSR at CGSC. March 2015, SSR: Mindanao was used as an end-of-course, practical exercise for the CGSC SOF Advanced Studies course (SOF Element, Department of Joint, Interagency and Multinational Operations, CGSC). Intend to use again in March Provided copies to multiple operational units and agencies. ARI Army Research Institute NPS Naval Post Graduate School CNA Center for Naval Analyses SOF Special Operations Forces CGSC Command and General Staff College TRISA TRADOC G2 Intelligence Support Activity 28 MCBL July 2015 Mission Command Battle Lab UFMCS University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies Putting Innovation into Practice 7
8 Lessons Identified/Lessons Learned What all Attempts to Turn Ideas into Innovations Require Ownership, passion. Persistence, proactive energy by lead. Active management of assets and actions. A vision/concept that can be explained, supporters and support established. Understand concept(s) and how it can be used in new ways, with other products. Identify and explain patterns and synergies. Think win-win. Taking action. Conceptualize, then start doing things. Avoid the not developed here wall. Be willing to admit when someone has an improvement over the base concept. An ability to take risks, make mistakes. Willingness to step outside the box, outside comfort zone. Challenge the status quo. Escaping to think. Secluded brainstorming sessions and workshops; spend time together. Capture thoughts and white board content, write things down. A product/system of more utility than what has been used before. Underlying aspects may be complex, sophisticated, nuanced. Near-term utility must be relatively easy to understand and be tangible. It must be compatible with the way people currently do things. Intermittent, visual successes and products that can be used. Timing and receptiveness. Superior results emerge when all aspects fire in unison. Provide intent and focus for innovation; link to mission. The proof s in the pudding: assess results, measure what s meaningful. 28 July 2015 Putting Innovation into Practice 8
9 Discussion Contact Info Paul Works Director, Analysis Development Group TRADOC Analysis Center Ft. Leavenworth (913) July 2015 Putting Innovation into Practice 9
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Briefing for the SAS Panel Workshop on SMART Cooperation in Operational Analysis Simulations and Models 13 October 2015 Release of
More informationUS Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Activities Update Las Cruces Chamber of Commerce Military Affairs Committee 2 August 2013 TRAC Mission and Organization The mission
More informationJoint Warfare System (JWARS)
Joint Warfare System (JWARS) Update to DMSO Industry Days June 4, 1999 Jim Metzger JWARS Office Web Site: http://www.dtic.mil/jwars/ e-mail: jwars@osd.pentagon.mil 6/4/99 slide 1 Agenda Background Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
More informationU.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview
U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office Overview Monday, October 02, 2017 Distribution Statement A: This presentation is unclassified, releasable to the public, distribution unlimited, and is exempt from
More information10 August Space and Missile Defense Technology Development Panel AMRDEC Missile S&T. Mr. Jeffrey Langhout
Space and Missile Defense Technology Development Panel AMRDEC Missile S&T Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is unlimited. 10 August 2017 Presented by: Mr. Jeffrey Langhout
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
More information21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability
21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability Topics Interoperability/Integration and Security Names of Authors Dr. Kenneth
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
More informationResponsive Decision Making through Automated Policy-Enabled Systems
Responsive Decision Making through Automated Policy-Enabled Systems Anne-Marie Buibish Amy Lange Michael Woitalla Raytheon Company Network Centric Systems 1010 Production Road Fort Wayne, IN 46808-4106
More informationU.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview
U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office Overview Thursday, February 02, 2017 Distribution Statement A: This presentation is unclassified, releasable to the public, distribution unlimited, and is exempt
More informationAPPENDIX A. COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF OFFICER COURSE CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION C3 ILE, ATRRS Code (Bn Option) Academic Year 05 06
APPENDIX A COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF OFFICER COURSE CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION 701 1 250 C3 ILE, ATRRS Code (Bn Option) C100 Foundations Block Academic Year 05 06 These modules are designed to make students
More informationForce 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationDISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc
More informationDoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationNavy Warfare Development Command s (NWDC) Operations Research Chair of Warfare Innovation
Navy Warfare Development Command s (NWDC) Operations Research Chair of Warfare Innovation Great Idea Briefing To CRUSER Chair: CAPT Jeff Kline, USN (ret) Professor of Practice Naval Postgraduate School
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationStrike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory MIT and ONR Objectives Office of Naval Research (ONR), PMR-51 Coordinates, executes, and promotes the S&T programs of the Navy and Marine Corps.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
More informationDepartment of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 71-4 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA
Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 71-4 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA 23651-1047 23 September 2008 Force Development UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Army Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #54 To Complete Total
More informationC4I System Solutions.
www.aselsan.com.tr C4I SYSTEM SOLUTIONS Information dominance is the key enabler for the commanders for making accurate and faster decisions. C4I systems support the commander in situational awareness,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 PE 65866N: Navy Space & Electr Warfare FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Cost To Complete Cost
More informationCapabilities Presentation
Capabilities Presentation Corporate Profile Established in 1977 Small Business (FAR subpart 19.001) Over 300 Professional Staff Members DUNS Number - 094744138 Cage Code - 1W582 Primary NAICS (541330,
More informationThe Verification for Mission Planning System
2016 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications (AITA 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-389-2 The Verification for Mission Planning System Lin ZHANG *, Wei-Ming CHENG and Hua-yun
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationSoftware Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy
Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy Naval Postgraduate School Acquisition Symposium 11 May 2011 Kathlyn Loudin, Ph.D. Candidate Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division
More informationAnnual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6th Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium February 13-14, 2018: Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3100.4 PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3100.4 From: To: Subj: Commandant of the Marine Corps
More informationA Ready, Modern Force!
A Ready, Modern Force! READY FOR TODAY, PREPARED FOR TOMORROW! Jerry Hendrix, Paul Scharre, and Elbridge Colby! The Center for a New American Security does not! take institutional positions on policy issues.!!
More informationMarine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL)
Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) 3 Dec 2009 BGen R. F. Fuzzy Hedelund Commanding General 1 Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) CG, MCCDC DCG, MCCDC Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Capabilities
More informationAssessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS
Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS Professor of Practice Jeff Kline, Operations Research Captain, USN (ret) Naval Postgraduate School
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationAir-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II Success and Challenges of Distributed Testing Mr. Timothy Menke Technical Director
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
More informationTest and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
More informationOPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3360.30D N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3360.30D From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3222.4 July 31, 1992 Incorporating Through Change 2, January 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures USD(A)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
More informationSynthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
More informationAMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION TM Office, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment Methodology & Analysis for Energy Security in Military Operations (MAESMO)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
More informationThe Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century
September How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21st Century Key Points Our ability to execute the Marine Corps Operating Concept in the future operating environment will require a force that has:
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3120.10A PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3120.10A From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To:
More informationSubj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO OPNAVINST 5450.223B N87 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.223B From: Chief of Naval Operations
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification May 2009 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 (RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT) OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES (OT&A) PROGRAM ELEMENT
More informationSimulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON
UNCLASSIFIED Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON NDIA 15 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 25 October 2012 Dr. Nancy Bucher ASA(ALT) OCSE/PoR nancy.bucher@us.army.mil
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationPerspectives on the Analysis M&S Community
v4-2 Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community Dr. Jim Stevens OSD/PA&E Director, Joint Data Support 11 March 2008 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationMission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
More informationExplaining Navy and Marine Corps Disruptive Innovations from 1899 to 2001
Warfighting and Disruptive Technologies: Disguising by Captain Terry C. Pierce USN Explaining Navy and Marine Corps Disruptive s from 1899 to 2001 John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard Doctoral
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationSystem Simulation and Development Directorate (SSDD) Overview
Presented to: Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association (HAMA) 14 Dec 2012 System Simulation and Development Directorate (SSDD) Overview DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution
More informationCollaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems
Collaboration, Interoperability, and Secure Systems May 21, 2008 Mr. Richard Lee ADUSD (Information Integration & Operations) ODUSD (Advanced Systems & Concepts Defense Research & Engineering 703-695-7938
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
More informationWinning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle
Training and Doctrine Command 2017 Global Force Symposium and Exposition Winning in Close Combat: Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle Innovation for Complex World Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
More informationMission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationWe Produce the Future. Air Force Doctrine
We Produce the Future Air Force Doctrine The Role of Doctrine At the very heart of warfare lies doctrine. It represents the central beliefs for waging war in order to achieve victory. Doctrine is of the
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3200.11 May 1, 2002 Certified Current as of December 1, 2003 SUBJECT: Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) DOT&E References: (a) DoD Directive 3200.11, "Major
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To
More informationArmy Experimentation
Soldiers stack on a wall during live fire certification training at Grafenwoehr Army base, 17 June 2014. (Capt. John Farmer) Army Experimentation Developing the Army of the Future Army 2020 Van Brewer,
More informationFuture Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability
More informationThe 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine
1923 1939 1941 1944 1949 1954 1962 1968 1976 1905 1910 1913 1914 The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine 1982 1986 1993 2001 2008 2011 1905-1938: Field Service Regulations 1939-2000:
More informationNAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PRESENTED TO: NAVAIR SMALL BUSINESS AVIATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 1 RDML STEVE EASTBURG ASSISTANT
More informationReconsidering the Relevancy of Air Power German Air Force Development
Abstract In a dynamically changing and complex security political environment it is necessary to constantly reconsider the relevancy of air power. In these days of change, it is essential to look far ahead
More informationAdvanced Operations Course (AOC)
Advanced Operations Course (AOC) The CGSOC Advanced Operations Course (AOC) prepares its graduates to serve as staff members and commanders with the ability to build and lead operational and tactical formations
More informationExtensible Battle Management Language
Extensible Battle Management Language Dr. Michael Hieb Alion Dr. Hieb is an Architect of the US Army Simulation to C4I Interoperability Overarching Integrated Product Team. He can be reached at (703) 933-3376.
More informationJoint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division JTLS & JCATS Program Manager M&S Analysis
More informationLadies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to
062416 Air Force Association, Reserve Officers Association and National Defense Industrial Association Capitol Hill Forum Prepared Remarks by Admiral Terry Benedict, Director of the Navy s Strategic Systems
More informationTraining and Evaluation Outline Report
Training and Evaluation Outline Report Task : 71-8-5702 Task Title: Determine Integrated Airspace User Requirements (Brigade-Corps) Distribution Restriction: for public release; distribution is unlimited.
More informationCommon Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
More informationaselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT November 2014 CONTENTS What Is The Problem? Common Picture? (EW Spectrum) Area of Interest Preemptive Operations EW Spectrum Management Steps For EW Spectrum Management Planning,
More informationFuture Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3000.07 December 1, 2008 USD(P) SUBJECT: Irregular Warfare (IW) References: (a) DoD Directive 5100.1, Functions of the Department of Defense and Its Major Components,
More information6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit March 14-15, 2018 Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria, VA 22314 Program Design
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20557 Navy Network-Centric Warfare Concept: Key Programs and Issues for Congress Ronald O Rourke, Foreign Affairs, Defense,
More informationHEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS
HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 44-100 US ARMY AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OPERATIONS Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited FM 44-100 Field Manual No. 44-100
More informationAUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF No. 46 January 1993 FORCE PROJECTION ARMY COMMAND AND CONTROL C2) Recently, the AUSA Institute of Land Watfare staff was briefed on the Army's command and control modernization plans.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
More informationNaval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
More informationArmy Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2016 Automatic Injury Detection Technology Assessment 05 October February 2016 Battle Lab Report # 346
Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2016 Automatic Injury Detection Technology Assessment 05 October 2015 19 February 2016 Battle Lab Report # 346 DESTRUCTION NOTICE For classified documents, follow
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Implementation of Data Collection, Development, and Management for Strategic Analyses
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8260.2 January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Implementation of Data Collection, Development, and Management for Strategic Analyses PA&E References: (a) DoD Directive 8260.1,
More informationNAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross
NAVAIR Overview PRESENTED TO: Radford University 30 November 2016 PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross NAVAIR NOV 2016 Mission NAVAIR's mission is to provide full life-cycle support of naval aviation
More informationSide-By-Side Comparison of Mobile Force Modeling Methods for Operational Effects and Virtual Prototyping
Side-By-Side Comparison of Mobile Force Modeling Methods for Operational Effects and Virtual Prototyping Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Joint Science and Technology Office Chemical and Biological
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified
Clinton Administration 1993 - National security space activities shall contribute to US national security by: - supporting right of self-defense of US, allies and friends - deterring, warning, and defending
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 29.127 24.622 29.546-29.546 24.448 24.593 24.444
More informationA Tool to Inject Credible Warfighter-Focused Non- Kinetic Attack Effects into the BMDS M&S Environment
A Tool to Inject Credible Warfighter-Focused Non- Kinetic Attack Effects into the BMDS M&S Environment SMD Symposium 2018 Denise Jefferson Software Engineer Northrop Grumman Today s Threats Ballistic Missile
More information