DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
|
|
|
- Mavis Dennis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland
2 DoD Analysis Initiatives OSD ATL Developmental Planning Army USA/VCSA Strategic Assessment ASA(ALT) SoS Systems Engineering AMC AMC Analysis Center Multiple Initiatives at Multiple Levels 2
3 Putting the Pieces Together OSD ATL: Early Development Planning Army USA/VCSA: Strategic Assessment ASA(M&RA) G1 HCCE Board MCE Board RCE Board SICE Board TRADOC ARFORGEN ASA(ALT) G4, G8 AMC USA G3/5/7 FORSCOM ARFORGEN Synch Board Human Capital Materiel Readiness Objective: Efficient Delivery of Outputs ASA(I&E) G2, G6, ACSIM IMCOM Services & Infrastructure Objective: Effective Delivery of Outcomes Trained and Ready Forces for the Combatant Commanders Iterative, rapid anticipatory interface between operational and technical community. Mature, valid concepts and technical models to enter and bolster the AoA. Engineering analysis that is broad based, considering strategic and operational direction, SoS and legacy integration. Improve ARFORGEN Adopt an Enterprise Approach Reform Requirements & Resource Processes CE Core Enterprise ASA(ALT): SoS Sys Engineering Organization AMC: Analysis for the Materiel Enterprise All Materiel Solutions All Network Solutions Integrate across the entire Army and across the POM years. Relevant, Integrated and Affordable Capabilities Focus on Lifecycle Analysis Support Key Ongoing Initiatives Provide an Opportunity to Better Sync Analysis, Enterprise Assessment and SoS System Engineering to Improve Acq & T&E 3
4 Where Does Development Planning Fit? OSD Lead: Systems Engr. Directorate Office of DDR&E Analysis, Tightly Coupled with SoS System Engineering during Development Planning Strongly Supports Improved Acq and T&E of Programs w/ Realistic Reqmts and Lower-Risk Solutions Plus, the Tools, Knowledge & Data Developed Early On --- Support T&E 4
5 Army is Updating Its Assessment Process Problem Statement: The problems with the Army s current assessment process are: (1) time constraints, (2) lack of cross-functional perspective and (3) lack of visibility into past, present or planned analysis. How does the Army ensure that senior-level decision makers and forums have all relevant information and analysis? HQDA Forums Army Enterprise Board As Needed ASA(M&RA) G1 HCCE Board MCE Board RCE Board SICE Board TRADOC ARFORGEN ASA(ALT) G4, G8 AMC USA G3/5/7 FORSCOM ARFORGEN Synch Board Human Capital Materiel Readiness Objective: Efficient Delivery of Outputs ASA(I&E) G2, G6, ACSIM IMCOM Services & Infrastructure Objective: Effective Delivery of Outcomes Trained and Ready Forces for the Combatant Commanders ARFORGEN Synchronization Board Improve ARFORGEN Adopt an Enterprise Approach Reform Requirements & Resource Processes CE Core Enterprise P M R S Will Directly Impact Army Acquisition and T&E Processes 5
6 ASAALT s SoS Systems Engineering Org. New Organization (SoSSEO) All Materiel Solutions All Network Solutions Integrate across the entire Army and across the POM years. Relevant, Integrated and Affordable Capabilities Materiel Enterprise (ME) Analysis to Improve the Army Acquisition Process Identify capability gaps Identify potential efficiencies Identify redundancies SoSSEO Can Be a Focal Point for Integrating Analysis Support to the ME 6
7 An AMC Step To Army Enterprise Analysis Analysis Capabilities Req d Strategic Decision Support & Business Ops Analysis Logistics Engineering Analysis Materiel Performance and Effectiveness Analysis Cradle-to-Grave A Transformed AMC Analytic Capability To Provide: Materiel Lifecycle Analysis Integrated Log, Mat, Cost Enterprise Focus Which Enables AMC & the Materiel Enterprise to: Achieve Affordability Enhance Perf/Effectiveness Provide Timely, Informed Warfighter Support Working within VCSA Assessment Support Capability Framework Examples: Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) AoA PEO-CS&CSS Fleet Mgt Study Responsible Retrograde Task Force (R2TF) Army Materiel Mgt Strategy Study (AMMSS) ME Materiel Enterprise Integrated Lifecycle Data, Info & Analysis to Improve Enterprise Decision-Making 7
8 ASA(ALT) SoSSEO & AMSAA Collaboration AMC AMSAA Needs, Trends, Issues, Priorities, etc. ASA(ALT) SoS SE Organization Strategic Decision Support & Business Ops Analysis M&S Cross Organization Collaboration & Coordination Capabilities/Requirements Analysis & Decomposition Logistics Engineering Analysis & Data Data Analysis Conduct independent assessments of technology feasibility, technical maturity/risk, & supportability for PEO/PM s Integrated Architectures Technology Transition / Insertion Focused Trade Decision Support Materiel Performance & Effectiveness Analysis & Data SME Mechanisms, Governance, & Processes Strategic Communications Perform integrated AMC analysis across entire materiel lifecycle in support of Army s ME. Apply SE at SoS-level across Army Enterprise to support Senior Army decision-making process. Both Organizations Collaborate to Inform Senior Army Enterprise Decision Making --- to Facilitate Delivery of Relevant, Integrated & Affordable Materiel Solutions 8
9 Some Parting Thoughts Successful acquisition and its associated T&E are dependent on doing our homework upfront --- realistic requirements & acceptable-risk solutions. That upfront piece needs to be better addressed by the analysis and SoS Systems Engineering communities during Development Planning. All of the tools, the data, the methodologies and the knowledge gained during that upfront phase can be directly applied to the follow-on T&E. Finally, continuing a lifecycle, SoS, and enterprise mindset throughout the acquisition cycle will improve the product & facilitate T&E. A Few Observations & Insights From an Army Analyst. 9
10 BACKUP 10
11 Analysis Myth Myth Doing more analysis earlier in the acq. cycle always leads to better system development, T&E, and acquisition. Another View Doing better analysis, tightly coupled with SoS Systems Engineering, as part of early Development Planning --- leads to: More realistic reqmts Better solutions Key Drivers of Successful Acquisition and T&E A Few Observations & Insights From an Army Analyst. 11
12 Enterprise Assessment Capability End States End State: Senior leaders supported by analysis that is unified, comprehensive, prioritized, and focused End State: Aligned set of outcomes, objectives, and metrics that provide information used to assess the Army s results and the effectiveness of strategies, investments, and decisions. End State: Senior leaders supported by a dedicated, objective, and group of analysts and subject matter experts who sense and respond to provide timely and integrated analysis. (Push v Pull Together) Enterprise Assessment Support Capability to support strategic decision making End State: Reliable, cohesive, transparent, and accessible data. End State: Alignment and availability of appropriate tools (e.g., business intelligence software, simulation modeling, forecasting) to enable assessment and analysis. End State: A focused and comprehensive assessment capability for senior decision makers that is strategically aligned, integrated, coordinated, and prioritized. Such a capability should respond to senior decision-maker requests while simultaneously monitoring the enterprise to sense less obvious trends and shifts. 15 Dec 09 This Is A Work In Progress --- and It Will Influence Acquisition & T&E 12
13 Developmental Planning in the Army Leveraging Full Body of Work TF 120 & Beyond GCV GCV CPDs GCV CPDs CPDs Operational Requirements Documentation GCV ICD GCV CDD MRAP, Stryker, Abrams, Bradley, Network Docs GCV AoA CURRENT SYSTEM UPGRADE CDD / CPD OIF/OEF LESSONS LEARNED GOVERNANCE USMC Docs CAPABILITY GAP ASSESSMENT; ATTRIBUTES BALANCING ANALYSIS; CAPABILITY BASED ASSESSMENT Battle Command Network ICD BRIGADE MODERNIZATION GTN Annex Network AoA FCS ORD 2.0 SoS PDR SO E-IBCT CPD JROC Approved BRIGADE MODERNIZATION CDD BCT CAP PACKAGE CPD FY UNMANNED GROUND SYSTEMS ICD BCT CAP PACKAGE CPD FY Army DP is integrated into Army force management process and addresses capability sets needed to address future threats Initial Draft Final Draft JROC approved Future Work Army s Enterprise Approach to ARFORGEN Will Change the Way We Approach Acquisition, T&E --- and Our Supporting Analysis & SE 13
14 Pre MS-A Development Planning Activities (Being Promoted by OSD-ATL) Understand need in the context of operations and other systems Put the need into operational, threat and systems context (CONOPs, and mission threads, thread profile and current SoS architecture) Identify ideas/concepts for solutions Communicate capability needs and gaps to concept generating organizations (i.e., industry, academia, S&T community, etc.) Receive and catalogue ideas and concepts Assess ideas/concepts to identify feasible material solution options Apply MS&A to confirm military utility (via modeling, via prototyping) Identify the impact on current systems Conduct initial lifecycle cost estimate Technical analysis of the proposed concepts Conduct SE and refine concept technical analysis artifact on promising concepts to provide technical foundation (via prototyping) Identify best mechanism to provide solution based on need & solution options Formal acquisition program, technology refresh, rapid fielding, etc. Continue System Analysis and SE support into the solution development For acquisition, technical advisor supporting the AoA study and analysis teams Tools/Data/Knowledge Dev d Here Provide Healthy Foundation for T&E Later. 14
Development Planning Working Group Update
Development Planning Working Group Update Ms. Aileen Sedmak Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 16th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Arlington, VA October
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
Applying Enterprise Architecting within Army Transformation
Applying Enterprise Architecting within Army Transformation Prof. Nightingale / LTC Matty 22 January 2009 http://lean.mit.edu 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Nightingale 11/17/08-1 Agenda Enterprise
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Army
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition
JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition By Gregory P. Cook Colonel, USAF (Ret) INTRODUCTION The past decade has seen significant change in the way the Department of Defense
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps Logistics Chain Management Increment 1 (GCSS-MC LCM Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update Ms. Aileen Sedmak Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 15th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
Overview of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program Requirements Process
Overview of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program Requirements Process 14 March 2012 Director, Joint Requirements Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense J-8, The Joint
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2006 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Joint Command and Control /PE 0303158K COST (in Millions) FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Joint Command and Control
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
An Independent Perspective From a former PM & PEO. NDIA 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 26 Oct 10
n Independent Perspective From a former PM & PEO NDI 13th nnual Systems Engineering Conference 26 Oct 10 Purpose To offer some thoughts on how System Engineering can (should) contribute as The DoD seeks
The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy
The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy Lt. Col. Carlos Wiley, USA Scott Newman Vivek Agnish S tarting in October 2012, the Army began to equip brigade combat teams that will deploy in 2013
US Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT Forward to STE As Is 1980s technology limits ability to train Combined Arms operations 47 terrain formats Concurrency challenges and not designed
UNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Actual Total Program Element (PE)
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System - Army Increment 2 (GCSS-A Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents
UNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2005 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, Defense-Wide/05
/PE 0303158K A. Mission Description & Budget Item Justification: (JC2) is the next generation of command and control for the Department of Defense (DoD). JC2 is the follow-on to the Global Command and
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 19.610 5.856 8.660-8.660 14.704 14.212
TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges
TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges 2012 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Conference 6 February 2012 Mr. Christopher Lowman Maintenance Directorate, G-4 Headquarters, Department of the Army
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 MISSILE Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line Item #128 To
OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 9.155 18.550 20.396
It s All about the Money!
2011 DOD Maintenance Symposium Breakout Session: It s All about the Money! Chien Huo, Ph.D. Force and Infrastructure Analysis Division (FIAD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Office of the
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Deliberate and Crisis Action Planning and Execution Segments Increment 2A (DCAPES Inc 2A) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
U.S. Army representatives used the venue of the 2012
By Scott R. Gourley U.S. Army representatives used the venue of the 2012 AUSA Annual Meeting and Exposition to outline a wide range of fielding, modernization and sustainment activities for its fleet of
Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 3528A: Distributed Common Ground/ FY
Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment
UNITED STATES ARMY Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment Organizations / Processes / Challenges & Priorities COL Frank M. Muth Director of Materiel, Force Development, Army 2 Agenda FOUO Agenda Organizations
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 3170.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, J, S JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM References: See Enclosure C 1. Purpose. The purpose
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #36 To Program Element - 7.074 10.429 28.764-28.764 21.717 22.687 20.902 20.383 Continuing
Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E
Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/DDR&E Chris DiPetto 12 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Agenda DT&E Title 10 USC overview Organization DDR&E imperatives What Title 10 means for
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Base Information Transport Infrastructure Wired (BITI Wired) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4151.22 October 16, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 19, 2018 SUBJECT: Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM + ) for Materiel Maintenance References:
Joint Warfare System (JWARS)
Joint Warfare System (JWARS) Update to DMSO Industry Days June 4, 1999 Jim Metzger JWARS Office Web Site: http://www.dtic.mil/jwars/ e-mail: jwars@osd.pentagon.mil 6/4/99 slide 1 Agenda Background Development
2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)
A Concept for Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ) Brigadier General Marc Rogers Director, Standing Joint Force Headquarters United States Joint Forces Command 1 Overview History The Joint Command
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125
Move from individual initiatives to enterprise-wide synchronization across multiple lines of operations
0 Over the past decade the Army has moved toward implementation of a sustainability framework by promulgating key initiatives to include the Army Strategy for the Environment; the Army Installation Energy
Enabling Greater Productivity
Enabling Greater Productivity An Imperative to Improve Materiel Readiness Panel Discussion June 2017 Productivity Defined Productivity* [proh-duhk-tiv-i-tee, prod-uhk ] noun 1. the quality, state, or fact
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Logistics Modernization Program Increment 2 (LMP Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army Increment 2 (IPPS-A Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Mission Planning System Increment 5 (MPS Inc 5) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System-Increment 1 (DEAMS Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED
Advanced Simulation Course for Army Simulation Management Professionals
Advanced Simulation Course for Army Simulation Management Professionals Gene Paulo Department of Systems Engineering Naval Postgraduate School eppaulo@nps.edu (831)656-3452 Introduction In 2009 NPS was
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Complete F58 NON LINE OF SIGHT
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
Joint Interoperability Certification
J O I N T I N T E R O P E R B I L I T Y T E S T C O M M N D Joint Interoperability Certification What the Program Manager Should Know By Phuong Tran, Gordon Douglas, & Chris Watson Would you agree that
AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb
AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb In February 2002, the FMI began as a pilot program between the Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) and the Materiel Command (AMC) to realign
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 90-16 31 AUGUST 2011 Special Management STUDIES AND ANALYSES, ASSESSMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Integrated Strategic Planning and Analysis Network Increment 4 (ISPAN Inc 4) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
Warfighting Capabilities Determination
Army Regulation 71 9 Force Development Warfighting Capabilities Determination Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 December 2009 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 71 9 Warfighting Capabilities
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION TM Office, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment Methodology & Analysis for Energy Security in Military Operations (MAESMO)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
Technical Data (an Output of Systems Engineering) in the Context of the LCMC
Technical Data (an Output of Systems Engineering) in the Context of the LCMC 9 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 23-26 October 2006 San Diego, CA R. Miller 1 Today s Agenda Statement of Purpose
Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6th Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium February 13-14, 2018: Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria,
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 3170.01F DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, J, S JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM References: See Enclosure D 1. Purpose. The purpose
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855
Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855 Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 20th Annual NDIA Systems
Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems
Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems Report to Congress March 2012 Pursuant to Section 901 of the National Defense Authorization
BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY
BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY 9 TRANSFORMATION Managing risk is a central element of both the Defense Strategy and the Army program. The Army manages risk using the Defense Risk Framework. This risk management
JCIDS Overview. Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System. Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System 1 JCIDS Overview Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division 2 Previous Requirements and Acquisition Process Frequently produced stovepiped
Report to Congress on Recommendations and Actions Taken to Advance the Role of the Chief of Naval Operations in the Development of Requirements, Acquisition Processes and Associated Budget Practices. The
Applying the Army Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel Methodology to Analyses of Alternatives
Applying the Army Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel Methodology to Analyses of Alternatives Dave Hull Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost and Economics (ODASA-CE) 31 March 2010 Agenda
U.S. Army Analysis & Center for Army Analysis (CAA) Overview
U.S. Army Analysis & Center for Army Analysis (CAA) Overview Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, CAA What kind of analysis are we talking about? Ends: Analyses as part of the Army and Joint leaders decision-making
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Combat Identification FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 7.74 29.884 - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration
US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration Maj Gen Dan Dick Director for Requirements and Integration, U.S. Joint Forces Command Unclassified Overview DoD Top Ten Priorities (FY03)
MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Presented to: THE SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE WORKING GROUP MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW Distribution Statement A - Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited. Review completed by AMRDEC Public
UNCLASSIFIED
A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The mission of the Advanced Information Technology Services Joint Program Office (AITS-JPO) is to expedite the transition of new Information Technology
MCO B C March Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS)
C 061 10 March 2008 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.15B From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS) Ref: (a) MROC Decision Memorandum
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Key Management Infrastructure Increment 2 (KMI Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+) #
Integrating the Systems Engineering "V" in a Systems of Systems
Integrating the Systems Engineering "V" in a Systems of Systems 3 March 2009 Mr. Jack Sheehan (jhs@orsacorp.com) Dr. Paul H. Deitz (Paul.H.Deitz@us.army.mil) Dr. David M. Bassan Bottom Line Up Front Employ
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3224.03 October 1, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) References: (a) DoD Directive 3224.3,
U.S. Army Munitions HQ DA G-3/5/7
U.S. Army Munitions HQ DA G-3/5/7 Richard J. Mason, Jr. COL, GS Chief, DA G3 Munitions NIPR: richard.mason@us.army.mil SIPR: richard.mason@hqda-s.army.smil.mil Agenda DA G-3/5/7 Munitions Mission Army
February 2009 Updated 31 July 2009 MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
MANUAL FOR THE OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM 1. Purpose. This manual sets forth guidelines and procedures for operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Command and Control. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element 3.140 0.000 0.000 0.000