Testing in a Distributed Environment
|
|
|
- Hannah Cole
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Testing in a Distributed Environment Mr. Stephen Kreider, SES Acting Deputy Program Executive Office Integration DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
2 PEO Integration Mission and Vision Mission The PEO Integration will utilize the Family of Systems approach to ensure integration and interoperability between Army Programs of Record (PORs), current force systems, urgent need systems, and other DOTL-PF elements to achieve integrated unit capabilities for a fullspectrum force. This integration approach will be implemented through development, acquisition, testing, product improvement and fielding while ensuring total ownership cost reduction. Vision To field fully integrated and tested capability packages composed of vehicles, network elements, equipment, and supporting infrastructure to modernize BCTs to achieve unprecedented joint combat capability in conjunction with the ARFORGEN process. The Army remains committed to an integrated development path for all capabilities, so while the individual systems will be under portfolio management by various PEOs, PEO Integration will be given the expanded mission for ensuring integration across those PEOs and associated portfolios. 2 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
3 Challenges with Testing a Network Environment There is no synchronized plan (short or long term) driving testing of Systems of Systems Integrated Network There are many players and many processes and that are not synchronized (JMETC, JOIN, FANS, JITC, ATIN, JTEN, BLCSE, MATREX DVL) Army Test and Evaluation Command no longer has a Virtual Proving Grounds Program and over the last 5 years capability on the ATEC Testing and Infrastructure Network (ATIN) has decreased little to no expertise in Army distributed testing (testing done local) The Army lacks requirements for designing, developing, integrating, testing and fielding of a Systems of Systems capability OSD policy towards Live only many times discourages distributed events Resulting in Test Officers wanting everything present for duty Continued to lack standard capabilities, instrumentation across test centers increases difficulty 3 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
4 Need a Network Acquisition Strategy Path to Success Align POR Milestone Events/Decisions (Schedules) Fully resourced cyclical, integrated test events Align Army labs support to the developmental process EXORD provides initial direction Rapid Fielding of Capability BCT Integrated Test Exercises (BCTIE) BCTIE schedule and team Facilitate agile acquisition Link BCTIEs to IT&E for risk reduction 4 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
5 Enabler: NDAA 2010, Section 804 *Source: MAR09 DSB Rpt on Acq of IT Systems DOD Initiative BCTIE #1 Exercise BCTIE #2 IT&E Annual Exercise Exercise Integrated Network Baseline Enhanced Network Baseline Enhanced Network Baseline Establish a BCT Network Baseline And Then Build On It Rapidly 5 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
6 EXORD Implementation Given Guidance to conduct integrated test we have developed a executable plan First fully integrated BCT Network test in FY12 is the final event. Has several individual program IOT&Es, but must also serve as the fully integrated BCT Network test in Mar 2012 Need multiple events culminating in an integrated network event 6 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
7 Integration and Test Cycle (CP/CS 15/16) 7 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
8 APG C4ISR Network Integration Partnership BRAC fosters a Collaborative Partnership among Army C4ISR Organizations at APG: ORGANIZATION LAB / CAPABILITY PEO C3T Tactical Systems Integration Lab (TSIL) PEO IEW&S DCGS-A, IMETS, DTSS, CGS PEO I Network Analysis & Integration Lab (NAIL) CERDEC C4ISR Systems Integration Lab (SIL) SEC Joint On-Demand Interoperability Node (JOIN) DTC (ATC) C4ISR Instrumentation Other Stakeholders: CTSF PEO Aviation RDECOM USMC (FBCB2) SED PM C4ISR OTM 8 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
9 Why: Better, Faster and Cheaper Network Integration Provides GFX with distributed capability for all (access to ABCS systems) within scope of org at no additional cost TSIL Access to federated networks via connection to JOIN infrastructure; built in link to Joint & Coalition networks Reuse of existing Army infrastructure/resources for new purposes: An Army efficiency initiative Documented facility cost savings Significant TDY reduction; significantly increased synergy Risk reduction for Army Integrated Network Tests integrate at APG, seamless hand-off to WSMR for first-run success with the Soldier Army Interoperability Certification preparation and execution: A C5ISR COE Building tomorrow s Army network together, today 9 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
10 APG---C4ISR team GOAL is to Build Efficiencies for Army C4ISR Community: Share organic subject matter expertise across organizations Leverage infrastructure / equipment don t duplicate resources Performance: Integrate products across PEOs before certification using a scalable distributed test network. Costs: Reduce travel / TDY costs + Share common facilities Schedule: Deliver integrated / interoperable solutions to the Warfighter more rapidly than at present. DT Hub APG OT Hub Ft Bliss / WSMR The Partnership Vision 10 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
11 PEO I LVC Contributions and Relationships Processes/Investments Leveraged Cross Command Collaboration Effort (3CE) JTRS Network Emulator (JNE) Communications Effects Server BCT Simulation Environment UOL/TNS/ SOSCOE IBCT Backbone NW Virtualization GOV AMSAA/NAIL/FFRDC/ CERDEC Fine Fidelity Network Performance MS Baseline Test-Beds GMR SIT C4ISR OTM HB SIL PEO I Large Scale Live- Virtualized Tactical Comms TRADOC Analysis Center ATEC/ WSMR IRCC NSC PEO I Integration Exercises NAIL PEO I T&E ACCN Partnership JOIN Lab SEC NAIL 11 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
12 Partnership Vision for Integrated Distributed Testing Network Integration Center (NIC) Operational Test APG Partnership SoS Test & Integration ASA (ALT) SSEI 12 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
13 Army Network Integration: Partnership s Vision Process People Organizations Systems Facilities Theater ATEC/FFID C4ISR Community E-Date: N/A Auth: 3768 PAX TOE Model: G-Series X AETF CAV 1CAB 2CAB FIRES BSB BSTB HHC BSTB H HT HHC HHC HHB HHC HHC MI M7 77 E W FSC FSC 2-1 AD (AETF) Government and Industry Partnership is Key FSC FSC Maintain continuous connectivity between multiple locations 13 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
14 Summary BRAC construction and movement still underway; unprecedented synergies to be gained in 2012 and beyond APG Partnership proactively moving to accelerate these synergies, linking within and beyond APG APG & WSMR: Same team, same mission. An Integrated Army Network, Now. 14 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
15 Backup/Other Thoughts 15 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
16 Acronym List 3CE Cross Command Collaboration Effort ABCS Army Battle Command System ACCN Aberdeen Common Control Node AETF Army Evaluation Task Force AMSAA Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity AoA Analysis of Alternatives APG Aberdeen Proving Ground ARFORGEN Army Force Generation ATC Aberdeen Test Command ATEC Aberdeen Test & Evaluation Center ATIN ATEC Testing & Infrastructure Network BCT Brigade Combat Team BLCSE Battle Lab Collaborative Simulation Environment BRAC Base Realignment and Closure C3T Command Control Communications Tactical C4ISR Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance C5ISR - Command, Control, Communications, Computer, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance CERDEC Communications Electronic Research, Development and Engineering Center COE Center of Excellence CP/CS Capability Package / Capability Set CTSF Central Technical Support Facility DCGS-A Distributed Common Ground System-Army DOTLPF Doctrine, Organization, Training, Leadership and Education, Personnel and Facilities DT Development Test DTC Developmental Test Command DTSS Digital Topographic Support System DVL Distributed Virtual Laboratory EXORD Executive Order FANS Federation of Army Network Sites FFRDC Fully Funded Research & Development Center GFX Government Furnished GMR Ground Mobile Radio HB Huntington Beach 16 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
17 Acronym List IBCT Infantry Brigade Combat Team IEW&S Intelligence, Electronics, Warfare & Sensors IMETS Integrated Meteorological System IRCC Inter-Range Control Center IOT&E Initial Operational Test & Evaluation IT&E Integrated Test Exercise JEMTC Joint Mission Environmental Test Capability JITC Joint Interoperability Test Command JNE JTRS Network Emulator JOIN Joint On-Demand Interoperability Node JTEN Joint Training and Experimental Network JTRS Joint Tactical Radio System JUONS Joint Urgent Operational Needs NAIL Network Analysis & Integration Laboratory NDAA National Defense Authorization Act NIC Network Integration Center NSC Network Simulation Center ONS Operational Needs Statement OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense OT Operational Test OTM On-The-Move PEO Program Executive Office POR Program of Record RDECOM Research, Development, and Engineering Command S&T Science & Technology SEC Software Engineering Center SED Software Engineering Directorate SIL Software Integration Laboratory SIT System Integration Test SSEI Systems of System Engineering & Integration T&E Test & Evaluation TRADOC Training and Doctrine Command TSIL Tactical System Integration Laboratory USMC US Marine Corps WSMR White Sands Missile Range 17 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
18 Brigade Combat Team Integration Exercise July 2010 Digital Network Capabilities Aerial SRW Network Extension Lower Tactical Network SRW EW & CC (Voice & Data) Company Command Post Increment I Network Integration Kit with Ground Mobile Radio (GMR) and Warfighter Information Network Tactical (WIN-T) Higher Tactical Network NCW (Voice & Data) Nett Warrior Rifleman s Radio Soldier Radio Waveform Images Position Location Indicators Sensor Information Voice Inc 1 Robotics & Sensors Handheld & Man-portable Devices HMS Manpack Real-time Collaboration w/higher HQs SIPR access Documents Battle-tracking Robotics and Sensor Data Management Voice Crossbanding SRW to WNW to SRW The Inc I NIK provides an integration hub for current and future network systems Wideband Networking & NetCentric Waveforms w/ Blue Force Tracker Images Streaming Video Battle Space Objects Battle Command Applications Sensor Information Voice Battle Command Applications TIGR CPOF AFATDS TacWeb MS Outlook Web Access 18 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
19 Cooperative Network Engineering and Integration Will Enable Rapid Capability Growth CS13-14 Current NIK INC2 Fully Integrated Company Post CS13-14 (Objective) Reduced SWAP- C Lower Cost and Better Integrated Transport POP/ SNE Integrated Company Command Post Network Management Suite Common, Modular, Computing Environment JBC-P Better Platform Integration Soldiers and Sensors in the Network 19 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Case Jan 2011.
BCT Network Integration and Technology Insertion
BCT Network Integration and Technology Insertion Richard S. Cozby Associate Director for C4ISR Program Executive Officer for Integration - System of Systems Test and Evaluation ATTN: SFAE-INT-TE, Bldg
Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON
UNCLASSIFIED Simulation and Emulation in Support of Operational Networks: ALWAYS ON NDIA 15 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 25 October 2012 Dr. Nancy Bucher ASA(ALT) OCSE/PoR nancy.bucher@us.army.mil
Future Combat Systems
Future Combat Systems Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry (APBI) BG John Bartley 15 October Overarching Acquisition Strategy Buy Future Combat Systems; Equip Soldiers; Field Units of Action (UA) Embrace
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 3528A: Distributed Common Ground/ FY
The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)
U.S. ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) MG John W. Charlton 8 November 2017 Mission What does ATEC do for the Army? ATEC plans, integrates,
NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION OPENING REMARKS
NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION OPENING REMARKS January 9, 2012 NIE 14.1 Industry Day Mr. Terry Edwards Director, SoSE&I NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATION AN ENDURING ARMY PROCESS January 9, 2012 NIE 14.1
FCS Update & Testing. Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR
FCS Update & Testing Bud Irish SAIC Vice President FCS Integrated Phases, Simulation & Test Deputy IPT MGR 3/13/2009 10:36:11 AM 1 Army Leadership s View Future Combat Systems is the core of our modernization
The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy
The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy Lt. Col. Carlos Wiley, USA Scott Newman Vivek Agnish S tarting in October 2012, the Army began to equip brigade combat teams that will deploy in 2013
PEO C3T PD Cyber Operations & Defense
PEO C3T PD Cyber Operations & Defense Jerry Cook CLASSIFICATION Designation Army Mission Command Network Vision Achieve distributed, uninterrupted mission command through a network comprised of intuitive,
SFC Paul Ray Smith Simulation & Training Technology Center (STTC)
SFC Paul Ray Smith Simulation & Training Technology Center (STTC) Individual Warfighter Effectiveness and Survivability in a CBRN Threat Environment 7 April 2010 Chris Gaughan, MATREX Technology Program
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018
NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018 THE ARMY WILL FIELD A NETWORK THAT IS EASY TO USE, WORKS IN ALL ENVIRONMENTS,
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
Capability Set Production and Fielding
Association of the United States Army for the Army Support for the October 2012 Capability Set Production and Fielding: Enhancing the U.S. Army s Combat Effectiveness Capability Set Production and Fielding
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605602A Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0305208A Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual to Total Total Program Element (PE) 128334 68662 188425 Continuing
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet
Net-Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) & Network Integration LandWarNet / LandISRNet 1 LandWarNet (LWN) Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) / Network Enabled Mission Command (NeMC) ICD LandISRNet Intel Appendices
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #82
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016
MATREX - Modeling Architecture for Technology, Research and EXperimentation Presentation to DoD M&S Conference 2008 Tutorial 10 March 2008
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command MATREX - Modeling Architecture for Technology, Research and EXperimentation Presentation to DoD M&S Conference 2008 Tutorial 10 March 2008 MATREX
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5100.91 October 28, 2008 USD(I) SUBJECT: Joint Intelligence Interoperability Board (JIIB) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Establishes
Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division
UNCLASSIFIED //FOR FOR OFFICIAL OFFICIAL USE USE ONLY ONLY Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (Critical Technology) 31 March 2016. Other
US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)
US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC) Activities Update Las Cruces Chamber of Commerce Military Affairs Committee 2 August 2013 TRAC Mission and Organization The mission
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
Speaking with One Voice
Roadmap to Army Networks in 2025 Speaking with One Voice By Kyle D. Barrett 2 Spring - 2016 The Network Modernization Roadmap illustrates our Army leaders strategy to fill capability gaps and make necessary
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)
FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2) Army ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 59,522 TRW Total Program Cost (TY$): $1.8B Average Unit Cost (TY$): $27K Full-rate production:
Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2016 Automatic Injury Detection Technology Assessment 05 October February 2016 Battle Lab Report # 346
Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2016 Automatic Injury Detection Technology Assessment 05 October 2015 19 February 2016 Battle Lab Report # 346 DESTRUCTION NOTICE For classified documents, follow
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0603008A Electronic Warfare Advanced Technology ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Total Program Element
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Program Element (PE) 33993 38970 33420 37335 35713 23230 23441 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT
ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT Our Army, combat seasoned but stressed after eight years of war, is still the best in the world and The Strength of Our Nation.
Single Integrated Ground Picture
Single Integrated Ground Picture 2003 Interoperability and System Integration Presented by: Anthony Lisuzzo Director, Intelligence and Information Directorate US ARMY CECOM 732-532-5557 Email: anthony.lisuzzo@mail1.monmouth.army.mil
DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION TM Office, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy and Environment Methodology & Analysis for Energy Security in Military Operations (MAESMO)
PM Mission Command AFCEA APG Chapter December 19, 2012
PM Mission Command AFCEA APG Chapter December 19, 2012 COL Jonas Vogelhut Project Manager, Mission Command VERSION XX The Command Post Challenge TAIS ISYSCON v4 AFATDS Warlock BFT/ FBCB2 SKL GBS DCGS-A
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
Communications- Electronics Command
U.S. Army Communications- Electronics Command Campaign Plan FY 2017 The "materiel integrator" for C4ISR Readiness CONTENTS 3 4 5 7 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 15 15 16 17 From the Commanding General Strategic
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
COE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force
COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES Generating Force COE Enables Increased Capability Agility Reduced Life Cycle Costs Flexible Standards-based Infrastructure Enhanced Cyber Protection Command Post Data
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Concepts Experimentation Program FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 Base PE 65326A: Concepts Experimentation
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System
(24 APRIL 2006) Joint Program Executive Office Joint Tactical Radio System MIDS International Review Board JTRS Moving Forward JPEO JTRS 5 May 2006 Mr. Howard Pace Deputy JPEO JTRS 619-524-4498 Howard.Pace@navy.mil
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY 2005 to Force XXI Battle Command, Brigade & Below (FBCB2) 52003* 65176 63601 37699 29154 12179 0 0 264137 * Database presently shows 56328. Internal
ASA(ALT) Office of the Chief Systems Engineer (OCSE) Info Brief Integrated SoS Architecture
ASA(ALT) Office of the Chief Systems Engineer (OCSE) Info Brief Integrated SoS Architecture 27 October 20 Mr David Poole Director of Architecture ASA(ALT) OCSE davidpoole@usarmymil Systems Architecture
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
Presentation to AFCEA
Presentation to AFCEA 14 MAR 2017 Approved for Public Release U.S. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS- ELECTRONICS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER COL Matthew F. Schramm Military Deputy Director Communications-Electronics
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 33.896 32.015 43.986-43.986 42.760 41.790
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603850F PE TITLE: Integrated Broadcast Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 03 Advanced Technology Development (ATD) 0603850F Integrated Broadcast
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 214 Army DATE: April 213 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 212 FY 213 # ## FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 To Program Element - 35.46 253.959 177.532-177.532 219.937
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) Total Program Element (PE) Cost 64312 68659 71079 72540 77725 77145 78389 Continuing Continuing DV02 ATEC Activities 40286 43109 44425 46678 47910 47007
COMMON OPERATING ENVIRONMENT COE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. OCTOBER 2015
COMMON OPERATING ENVIRONMENT COE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. OCTOBER 2015 > COE: WHAT IT MEANS TO THE SOLDIER Ten years ago, chances are you had a calculator, a calendar and
Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
Executive Summary Linking Resourse Decisions to Army Strategy Army Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Objectives and Priorities...
Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Linking Resourse Decisions to Army Strategy... 2 Army Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Objectives and Priorities... 10 Equipment Portfolio Overviews... 13 Soldier...14 Mission
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab
The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab Helping to Improve Acquisition Timelines Jeffrey D. From n Brett R. Burland 56 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield
Headquarters Air Combat Command ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Col Tom Wozniak ACC/A8C 25 July 2006 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview Tactical Level Programs TTNT, TACP,
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Tactical Electronic Surveillance System - Adv Dev. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6th Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium February 13-14, 2018: Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria,
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
Delivering the Tactical Network
Delivering the Tactical Network BG Daniel P. Hughes Program Executive Officer AFCEA Aberdeen Technical Workshop Capable but Less Complex Network Simplify Streamline Realign Coalition the network for the
Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment
UNITED STATES ARMY Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment Organizations / Processes / Challenges & Priorities COL Frank M. Muth Director of Materiel, Force Development, Army 2 Agenda FOUO Agenda Organizations
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Army Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #54 To Complete Total
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams
FCS AND THE UNIT OF ACTION ACCELERATING TECHNOLOGY TO THE MODULAR FORCE An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright Meg Williams BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright, Program Manager Unit of Action (PM UA), recently
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
Battle Lab Simulation Collaboration Environment (BLSCE): Multipurpose Platform for Simulation C2
Battle Lab Simulation Collaboration Environment (BLSCE): Multipurpose Platform for Simulation C2 BCBL (Gordon) Mission FY03 & Beyond BCBL (GORDON) MISSION TASKS Support all TRADOC battle labs and proponents
Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing
Future Future Industry Day Briefing MG Joseph L. Yakovac Program Executive Officer, Ground 11 February 2003 Program Manager s Intent: Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Integrated Broadcast Service (DEM/VAL) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 24.438 20.580 20.046-20.046 19.901
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 19.610 5.856 8.660-8.660 14.704 14.212
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview
Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview Ted Bujewski, Director, Rapid Innovation Fund Program Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering) August 2018 Most of the disruption that
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Soldier Systems - Warrior Dem/Val
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 20.602 20.886 48.309-48.309 60.003 53.434
Ground Combat Command and Control Family of Systems / ABCS SE&I
Ground Combat Command and Control Family of Systems / ABCS SE&I Mr. Randall Matura Chief, Business Management Division PM Ground Combat Command and Control (732) 427-3303 Randall.Matura@c3smail.monmouth.army.mil
Towards a Robotics Strategy
Towards a Robotics Strategy LTG Michael A. Vane Deputy Commanding General, Futures, and Director, Army Capabilities Integration Center US Army Training and Doctrine Command 25 Mar 09 Army Capabilities
CECOM LCMC Past, Present, and Future Sights Fixed on Soldiers. Timothy L. Rider
CECOM LCMC Past, Present, and Future Sights Fixed on Soldiers Timothy L. Rider In late June 1917, Camp Little Silver, NJ, consisted only of pup tents and tent pegs. The First and Second Reserve Telegraph
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview Prepared for ITEA Test & Evaluation (T&E) of System of Systems (SoS) Conference 24-27 January 2012 Mr Jesse Flores Test Engineer / JICO 46TS/OGEJ (Jacobs/TYBRIN)
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 29.127 24.622 29.546-29.546 24.448 24.593 24.444
Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate. Dismounted Mission Command
Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate Dismounted Mission Command 1 Dismounted Mission Command Transition to Mobile HH CE Incremental Modernization Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #36 Complete Total Program Element - 18.216 - - - - - - - - - 18.216 644778:
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($
UNITED STATES ARMY. FCS - Sensors. LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov Army Strong 1
UNITED STATES ARMY FCS - Sensors Army Click Precision Modernization to add Strike Briefing Annual Strategy Review Title and April Approach 15, 2008 LTG Stephen Speakes 14 Nov 2007 Army Strong 1 AGENDA