Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice (CCT) Metrics Reporting

Transcription

1 Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice (CCT) Metrics Reporting ICANN s Affirmation of Commitments mandates that it review the New gtld Program in terms of competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice (CCT). The ICANN community recommended a list of metrics and definitions that would inform this review and the ICANN board approved these metrics. ICANN staff is responsible for collecting data necessary to produce these metrics, which will be part of the recurring CCT review. This webpage serves as a central reporting space for CCT metrics. Each metric includes the number it was assigned by the community in its recommendations. Not all approved metrics are included here, as some were incorporated into other efforts, including a consumer survey, registrant survey and an economic study. Some, but not all, metrics include information about the period prior to the introduction of the first new gtlds in October 2013, and will serve as a baseline of comparison for future data. Those metrics include a footnote indicating which period of the data is considered part of the baseline. ICANN will update the metrics as new data becomes available. The update schedule is noted next to each metric. View Metrics by Category Compliance Registries Registrars Domain Name Registrations Domain Name Navigation Rights Protection Mechanisms Compliance These metrics are drawn from data compiled by ICANN s compliance department. This section will be updated annually, as the ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report is published.

2 1.6 Notices of Breach Issued to registry operators The total number of notices of breach issued to registry operators by ICANN because of contract or policy compliance matters. [Updated Annually] Registry Breach Notices Sources: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report Baseline: Notices of Breach Issued to Registrars for Contract or Policy Compliance Matters The number of notices of breach of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement that ICANN sent to Registrars. [Updated Annually] Notices of Breach Suspensions Terminations Sources: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report Baseline: Registry & Registrar General Complaints The metrics reports on the number of general complaints, regarding both registries and registrars, published by ICANN Compliance. This includes information about registrars, WHOIS information, IP address issues, spam/viruses and website content. [Updated Annually]

3 Registrar Number of Complaints 48,711 26,188 39,869 45,926 Registry Number of Complaints N/A* N/A* 1,921 2,180 Total Number of Complaints 48,711 26,188 41,790 48,106 Sources: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report Baseline: *This data is not available because prior to 2014, there was no consolidated platform to collect data on Registry Complaints Complaints Regarding Inaccurate, Invalid, or Suspect WHOIS Records This metric reports on the number of complaints regarding incomplete or incorrect WHOIS data published by ICANN Compliance. [Updated Annually] Total WHOIS Complaints 30,751 15,283 29,857 36,354 Complaints Regarding Access Complaints Regarding Inaccuracy 30,535 15,158 29,609 34,740 Source: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report Baseline: Total Number of Complaints Received by ICANN Regarding Improper Use of Domains Prior to the delegation of the first new gtld as part of the New gtld Program, ICANN staff compiled a list of closure codes related to confusion or misunderstanding of TLD functions. These codes went into function These closure codes have been used to determine the total number of complaints in this category. Some examples of these closure codes include: hijacking, website content, or spam. This metric reports on annual totals. [Updated Annually]

4 2013* Total Number of Complaints N/A Sources: ICANN databases 8.1 Total Number of Complaints Received by ICANN Related to Confusion or Misunderstanding of TLD Functions Prior to the delegation of the first new gtld as part of the new gtld Program, ICANN staff compiled a list of closure codes related to confusion or misunderstanding of TLD functions that could be used to measure. These closure codes have been used to determine the total number of complaints in this category. Some examples of these closure codes include: private dispute, domain a cctld, and complaint about a wrong website. This metric reports on annual totals. [Updated Annually] Total Number of Complaints 5 3,965 5,063 Sources: ICANN databases 8.3 Registries That Have Been the Subject of Public Interest Commitments (PICs)-related Complaints to ICANN As Reported in ICANN Compliance Reports There have been no reported complaints related to Public Interest Commitments submitted to ICANN's compliance department and published in its Annual Report. [Updated Annually] Source: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report 8.4 Registries Losing a Dispute Resolution Procedure Related to PICs This metric measures the number of registries that have lost a dispute resolution process related to their Public Interest Commitments (PICs). [Updated Annually] There have been no DRPs related to PICs since the launch of the New gtld Program.

5 Source: ICANN Contractual Compliance Annual Report Back to top Registries These metrics are drawn from data sources from IANA root zone data of delegated TLDs, executed Registry Agreements, and registry websites. [Updated Monthly] 2.4 TLDs Using IDN Scripts The number of Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) top-level domains (TLDs) delegated into the Internet's root zone. [Updated Monthly] [As of: 31 March 2016] Language*** Count Arabic 6 Chinese 44 German 2 Hebrew 1 Hindi 3 Japanese 11 Korean 3 Russian 7 Thai 1 Persian 1 Script Type*** Count Arabic 7 Cyrillic 7 Devanagari 3 Han 47 Hangul 2 Hebrew 1 Japanese* 2 Katakana 6 Latin Script* 2 *Note: The two German IDNs are counted in the Latin script category due to the inclusion of IDN characters in the string **(Alias for Han + Hiragana + Katakana) ***Note: Language and script type are defined as those specified by the applicant in questions 14C1 and 14D1 of the new gtld application, respectively.

6 Source: gtld Applications CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice 2.7 Legal Regimes Where New gtld Registry Operators are Based The number of legal regime where new gtld registry operators are based. The Legal Regime is determined using the identification of the parties specified in the Registry Agreement. The Registry Agreements can be found here. [Updated Monthly] [As of: 31 March 2016] ISO Code Count of gtlds AE 3 AT 2 AU 26 BE 3 BH 2 BM 3 BR 10 CA 4 CH 35 CN 27 CO 1 DE 44 DK 4 ES 13 FI 3 FR 27 GB 28 GI 16 HK 15 IE 22 IN 10 IQ 1 IT 6 JP 50 KR 4 KW 2 KY 71 LU 6

7 MX 2 NL 6 NO 2 NZ 1 PT 2 QA 1 RU 7 SA 4 SC 7 SE 9 SG 4 TH 1 TR 7 TW 1 US 427 UY 4 VG 7 ZA 3 European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) 1 Intergovernmental Organization 1 Region Code Count of gtlds AP 156 AQ 0 EUR 339 LAC 15 NA 433 IGO 1 Source: gtld Applications CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice. *This data is categorized using the ICANN Geographic Regions list. **The country codes are based on the ISO standard.

8 3.1 Quantity of TLDs The total number of TLDs before and after expansion of the Domain Name System as a result of the New gtld Program. [Updated Monthly] Baseline Quantity of all TLDs (includes cctlds)* Total Quantity of Delegated TLDs Post-October 2013 [As of: 31 March 2016] Source: IANA Root Zone Database CCT Review Category: Competition 3.2 Quantity of gtlds The total number of gtlds under contract with ICANN before and after expansion. [Updated Monthly] Baseline Quantity of Legacy gtlds* Total Quantity of Delegated gtlds Post October 2013 [As of: 31 March 2016] Source: ICANN gtld Delegated Strings List and IANA Root Zone Database CCT Review Category: Competition *Note: This metric considers the following as legacy gtlds: '.com' '.net' '.org' '.aero' '.asia' '.museum' '.xxx' '.pro' '.cat' '.mobi' '.jobs' '.coop' '.name' '.biz' '.info' '.tel' '.travel', '.post' 3.2.a Quantity of gtlds Removed from the Root Zone The gtld.doosan was removed form the Root Zone on 19 February It therefore has been removed from the total number of gtlds. The Legal Notice regarding its removal can be found here and the IANA Report on revocation can be found here. 3.3 Unique gtld Registry Operators The number of unique* gtld registry operators before and after expansion. [Updated Monthly]

9 Baseline Quantity of Unique* Registry Operators Total Quantity of Unique* Registry Operators [As of: 31 March 2016] Source: Registry Agreement CCT Review Category: Competition *Note: The term 'Registry Operator' refers to the entity holding the registry contract with ICANN. A registry operator is also responsible for providing registry services, some or all of which may be outsourced. A Unique Registry Operator,' however, is considered one that is not already operating a delegated gtld. 3.4 Unique gtld Registry Service Providers The number of unique* gtld Registry Service Providers before and after expansion. Registry Service Providers (RSPs) were identified based on data in new gtld applications. [Updated Monthly] Total Quantity of Unique* gtld Registry Service Providers [As of: 31 March 2016] 41 Source: gtld Applications CCT Review Category: Competition *Note: The term 'Registry Service Provider' refers to an entity providing certain technical operations for a Registry Operator. This term is not meant to include an Emergency Back End Registry Operator (EBERO). A Unique Registry Service Provider,' however, is considered one that is not already providing registry services to a delegated gtld. 3.6 New gtlds Operated by New Entrants The relative share of new gtlds operated by new entrants; Registry Operators* that did not operate a gtld prior to the expansion of the Domain Name System as a result of the New gtld Program. [Updated Monthly] [As of: 31 March 2016] Share Operated by 'New Entrants' Share Operated by 'Legacy*' Registry Operators 97.5% (931 gtlds) 2.4% (23 gtlds)

10 Source: gtld Applications CCT Review Category: Competition *Note: This metric considers the following as 'legacy' gtlds: '.com' '.net' '.org' '.aero' '.asia' '.museum' '.xxx' '.pro' '.cat' '.mobi' '.jobs' '.coop' '.name' '.biz' '.info' '.tel' '.travel' **Note: The term 'Registry Operator' refers to the entity holding the registry contract with ICANN. A registry operator is also responsible for providing registry services, some or all of which may be outsourced. A Unique Registry Operator', however, is considered one that is not already operating a delegated gtld. 7.1 Registry Privacy Policies The number of gtld registries with privacy policies that are clearly and easily accessible by end users.* Metrics Excel File [Baseline Data] *Note: This data table only includes baseline findings related to metrics ICANN staff is currently developing a qualitative method to collect data for metrics Registry Allocation Policies The number of gtld registries with allocation policies that are clearly and easily accessible by end users. Metrics Excel File [Baseline Data] *Note: This data table only includes baseline findings related to metrics ICANN staff is currently developing a qualitative method to collect data for metrics Registry Codes of Conduct The number of registries that disclose end-user information regarding their codes of conduct for sub-domain owners/operators. Metrics Excel File [Baseline Data] *Note: This data table only includes baseline findings related to metrics ICANN staff is currently developing a qualitative method to collect data for metrics

11 Back to top Registrars The metrics included in this category represent registrars that offer registrations in IDNs, as well as the total number of registrars. 2.5 Registrar Websites offering Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) Scripts at the Second Level [Updated Bi-Annually] The number of registrars allowing Internet users to register IDN scripts at the second level through their websites. Month/ Year 08/27/ /24/2016 Total Offering IDNs at the second level Percentage of Registrars Offering IDNs at the second level 14.8% 12.2% Source: List of Registrars offering IDN registrations* CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice *Note: All registries do not publish a list of registrars offering IDN registrations. Numbers based on the list published by Verisign are included here for reference. Note: this list does not specify when Verisign updates it. Submission is open to a wide range of topics and methodological approaches under the broad rubric of public diplomacy. We encourage submissions that are closely aligned with the Center s current research initiatives listed below. A 500-word abstract and CV should be submitted by May 30, 2016, via , tocpd@usc.edu. Quantity of Registrars The number of ICANN-accredited registrars before and after the first delegation of the New gtld Program, along with an indication of regions where registrars are based. [Updated Twice Annually in April and October]

12 April 2011 October 2011 April 2012 October 2012 April 2013 Total Accredited Registrars Total Domains ,327, ,335, ,025, ,838, ,920,457 October 2013 April 2014 October 2014 April 2015 October 2015 April 2016 Total Accredited Registrars Total Domains 149,159, ,272, ,210, ,149, ,805, ,552,998 Regional Breakdown of Registrars North America Europe Asia/ Pacific South America Africa Source: Internal ICANN Reports and ICANN List of Registrars (The number of Registrars may change on a daily basis as registrars are terminated or added. The numbers here are reported as of 31 October each year.) CCT Review Category: Competition Back to top

13 Domain Name Registrations The metrics in this group provide insight into how registrants around the world are entering the domain name market via new gtlds. 2.6 Registrations in IDN TLDs as Compared to the Total Number of Registrations in New gtlds This metric will demonstrate whether growth in IDN TLDs is comparable to growth in all new gtlds. [Updated Monthly] Month/ Year IDN registrations Total New gtld Registrations October November December January ,815 February , ,198 March ,564 April , ,419 May , ,537 June ,459 1,319,344 July ,345 1,793,004 August ,587 2,247,728 September ,126 2,622,744

14 October ,354 3,158,011 November ,875 3,483,028 December ,394 3,807,651 January ,211 4,255,704 February ,592 4,531,623 March ,755 4,849,345 April ,115 5,308,745 May ,032 5,799,230 June ,132 6,306,901 July ,228 6,751,961 August ,633 7,266,258 September ,968 8,082,627 October ,526 8,904,130 November ,100 10,552,144 December ,831 11,313,275 January ,411 12,029,514 February ,852 15,126,818 Source: Bulk Registration Data Access (BRDA) Files CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice 2.9 Relative Share of Domain Names in New gtlds Existing in Legacy TLDs Prior to Expansion

15 This metric looks at the relative share of new gtld registrations already having the same domain in legacy TLDs prior to expansion. The data will be presented as a snapshot in time. A random sample of 25 gtlds was selected to be published in this chart. The same random sample is used for metrics 3.8 and 4.4. [Updated Monthly] gtld Number of Domain Names Existing in Legacy TLDs Prior to Expansion December, 2015 Number of Domain Names Existing in Legacy TLDs Prior to Expansion January, 2016.arte 1 1.bbva 1 1.bet bot 1 1.drive 2 2.fresenius 1 1.game 5 5.gives hosting 15,085 15,207.irish 1,527 1,579.ltd 1 1.origins 1 1.pics 24,504 24,747.realty sandvikcoromant 4 4.solutions 40,342 40,976

16 .style 3,523 3,784.tatamotors 1 1.tiffany N/A 1.weber 1 1.xn--3ds443g 28,381 28,413.xn--fiq64b xn--kcrx77d1x4a 4 4.yandex Source: Bulk Registration Data Access (BRDA) Files CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice 2.11 Jurisdictions Where New gtld Registrants are Located This metric measures the geographic diversity of registrants across all new gtlds, using a sample of names. The number of registrants is based on the sample, not the total number of registrants per country. The sample is based on WHOIS output information as of July 2015 for a sample of 37,500 domain names for the 660 delegated new gtlds. [Updated Annually] Metric 2.11 Excel File. Country Number of Registrants* (As of 07/2015) CN 10,218 US 9,612 JP 2,695 DE 2,602 UK 1,686 CY 1,500 FR 917 CA 913 PA 821 AU 791

17 Source: WHOIS Output information CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice 3.8 Unique Second Level Registrations in the New gtld Space The number of registrations for second-level domain names in the new gtld space that do not appear as a registration in any other TLD. A random sample of 25 gtlds were selected to be published in this chart. The same random sample is used for metrics 2.9 and 4.4. [Updated Monthly] gtld Quantity of unique second level registrations January, 2016 Percentage of unique second level registrations January, 2016.arte %.bbva %.bet 1 0.4%.bot 0 0%.drive 0 0%.fresenius 0 0%.game 0 0%.gives %.hosting %.irish %.ltd 0 0%.origins 0 0%.pics 5, %.realty 0 0%

18 .sandvikcoromant 0 0%.solutions 1, %.style %.tatamotors %.tiffany 0 0%.weber 0 0%.xn--3ds443g 10, %.xn--fiq64b %.xn--kcrx77d1x4a 0 0%.yandex 0 0% Source: Bulk Registration Data Access (BRDA) Files CCT Review Category: Competition 4.4 Percentage of Non-Resolving Domains The percentage of domains in each new gtld that are registered but do not resolve. A random sample of 25 gtlds was selected to be published in this chart. The same random sample is used for metrics 2.9 and 3.8. [Updated Monthly] gtld Number of Non-Resolving Domains January, 2016 Percentage of Non-Resolving Domains January, 2016.arte %.bbva %.bet %

19 .bot 0 0%.drive 1 50%.fresenius 0 0%.game %.gives %.hosting %.irish %.ltd 0 0%.origins 0 0%.pics 1, %.realty 0 0%.sandvikcoromant 3 60%.solutions 1, %.style %.tatamotors %.tiffany 0 0%.weber 0 0%.xn--3ds443g 29, %.xn--fiq64b 2 1.8%.xn--kcrx77d1x4a 3 75%.yandex 0 0%

20 Source: Bulk Registration Data Access (BRDA) Files Back to top Domain Name Navigation These metrics are compiled by ICANN s technical services team and include data on how domain names resolve in web browsers and other end-user applications. These metrics will be added at a later date. Back to top Rights Protection Mechanisms These metrics are compiled from Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedure (UDRP) and Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) providers, as well as complaints to ICANN regarding these procedures. 1.9.a. Filed UDRP and URS Cases against Registrants The number of cases filed with UDRP and URS providers. [Updated Annually] Year Total ,987 (UDRP) ,371 (UDRP) ,436 (UDRP) & 229 (URS) ,466 (UDRP) & 220 (URS) Source: Arbitration Provider Databases 1.9.b. Combined UDRP and URS Complaints to ICANN This metric reports on the number of complaints to ICANN concerning implementation of UDRP and URS decisions. [Updated Annually] Year UDRP Complaints

21 Year UDRP Complaints Year URS Complaints Source: ICANN Databases 1.10 Combined UDRP and URS Decisions Against Registrants The number of UDRP and URS decisions against registrants. [Updated Annually] UDRP Baseline Data: Combined UDRP & URS Data Post Expansion:

22 Source: Arbitration provider databases (Note: Some arbitration providers also provide data on cctlds. This data does not reflect cctld cases. This data is subject to change on the arbitration provider databases. To access the most up-to-date data please review the databases here: List of Approved Dispute Resolution Providers. Please note that only the Asia Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre and the National Arbitration Forum provide URS arbitration services and UDRP services.) 1.12 Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolutions Procedure (RRDRP) Decisions The RRDRP is intended to address circumstances in which a community-based New gtld Registry Operator deviates from the registration restrictions outlined in its Registry Agreement. [Updated Annually] As of 22 February 2016 there have been no RRDRP cases. Source: The National Arbitration Forum Databases 2.8 Share of Sunrise Registrations and Domain Blocks to Total Registrations in Each TLD The number of sunrise registrations in new gtlds and legacy gtlds, to the extent that data was available. Domain blocks are defined as commercial

23 blocking services offered by registries. Consolidated data on domain blocks is not currently available. The data presented here only reports on the share of sunrise registrations to total registrations in each TLD. [Updated Annually] Metric 2.8 Excel File (Updated: 15 December 2015) Source: Trademark Database Reports CCT Review Category: Consumer Choice Back to top