Analyzing Sustainment and Maintenance Alternatives. Moderator Ms. Lisha Adams Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Material Readiness
|
|
- Kory Bradley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Analyzing Sustainment and Maintenance Alternatives Moderator Ms. Lisha Adams Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Material Readiness
2 Mr. Christopher Lowman Director for Maintenance Policy, Programs and Processes for US Army, Office of the Deputy of Staff, G-4 Mr. Jeff Sorenson Vice President and Partner, AT Kearny Colonel Christopher Coombs Chief, KC-46 Division, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas, Honeywell Mr. Dennis West Deputy Commander for Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command
3 The Environment and What We Know Supporting the Warfighter remains the Department s top priority Fact: Defense spending declines after every major conflict Discretionary spending (the budget trade space we operate within to support the warfighter) has decreased over time National Security Strategy resource challenge: ensuring readiness for tomorrow. Active Duty Military PB15 BCA Capped Budget data: table 8.7 Let our advance worrying become advance thinking and planning. Winston Churchill
4 Balancing Act Resources National Security Our Ends superior support to the Warfighter Our Means fiscal, materiel, and personnel Our Ways? Without failure; we must now apply resources in a most efficient manner
5 *excerpt from 10 USC Sec Life-cycle management and product support Why We Need to Analyze Alternatives? 10 USC 2337 To Comply with Law DoDI PSM Guidebook DoDI DAG To Make the Best Possible Use of Limited Funds To Identify the Optimum Solution for Achieving a Stated Goal or Objective To Reflect an Enterprise Perspective To Make an Informed Decision To Consider 2 nd and 3 rd Order Effects PBL Guidebook PPP Guidebook Product Support Manager Responsibilities*: Use appropriate predictive analysis and reduce operation and sustainment costs conduct appropriate cost analyses to validate the product support strategy prior to each change in the product support strategy or every five years, whichever occurs first, revalidate any business-case analysis
6 Mr. Christopher Lowman Director for Maintenance Policy, Programs and Processes for US Army, Office of the Deputy of Staff, G-4 Mr. Jeff Sorenson Vice President and Partner, AT Kearny Colonel Christopher Coombs Chief, KC-46 Division, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas, Honeywell Mr. Dennis West Deputy Commander for Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command
7 DoD Maintenance Symposium Analyzing Sustainment and Maintenance Alternatives Nov 17, 2014 Jeff Sorenson, President and Partner A.T. Kearney Public Sector and Defense Services, LLC
8 Benchmarking and Alternative Assessments Why benchmark? Develops quantifiable metrics for analyses Helps determine best in class performance Identifies areas for continuous improvement Illustrates competitive edge Applications of benchmarking to derive alternative assessments Determine should cost of product Provides corresponding substitute for actual data that is not available Identifies process performance gaps for evaluation Contributes to better understanding of outside industry sector best practices 8
9 Benchmarking in DoD can be difficult across programs and or primes due to differences in metric/process definitions Comparable Benchmarks Benchmarking rates should be done with caution as disclosure statements vary from company to company and organic comparable rates are difficult to collect 9
10 Base Level Support Supply Inventory Control Point Engineering R&M Benchmarking can be used to evaluate different sustainment business models at the major activity level based on the proposed scope of execution Baseline Program Program #2 Program #3 Alternative As-Is Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Supply in Alternative 1 does not change, so the baseline program is the best proxy for supply performance in this alternative R&M does change in Alternative #1 to a processes similar to the process used in Program #3, so R&M performance is best approximated by Program #3 10
11 In the absence of desired of required data, priorities can be with different proxies or benchmarks A.T. Kearney BCA Evaluation Models Data Priority Financial Analysis 11) Operating Costs 12) One Time Costs 13) Net Present Value 14) Sensitivity/Tipping Point Is Program Data Available? Y 1 Program Actual 15) Worst Case Scenarios Financial Evaluation of Alternatives N N Y 2 Existing Historical Data Benefits Analysis 16) W/S Performance 17) Knowledge Analysis N Y 3 Program Estimated Data 18) Capability Analysis 4 19) Effectiveness Analysis 20) Tools and Proc. Analysis Y New Proxy Data Collection 21) Government I&O 22) Enterprise Fit Completed Benefit Analysis N 5 Simulation Modeling Approach 11
12 This can be presented to program management to assure alignment early in a project Module D Financial Analysis E Benefits Analysis Analysis Program Actual Program Estimated New Proxy Data Collection o Simulation Existing Historical u Supply Chain Sustaining Eng. Fleet Mgmt Field Support 11) Operating Costs 12) One-Time Costs 13) Net Present Value 14) Sensitivity / Tipping Point 15) Worst Case Scenarios 16) Weapon System Performance o o o o 17) Knowledge u u u u 18) Capability u u u u 19) Effectiveness u u u u 20) Tools & Procedures 21) Government I&O u u u u 22) Enterprise Sustainment Fit 12
13 Mr. Christopher Lowman Director for Maintenance Policy, Programs and Processes for US Army, Office of the Deputy of Staff, G-4 Mr. Jeff Sorenson Vice President and Partner, AT Kearny Colonel Christopher Coombs Chief, KC-46 Division, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas, Honeywell Mr. Dennis West Deputy Commander for Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command
14 2014 DoD Maintenance Symposium Analyzing Sustainment and Maintenance Alternatives Panel Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas
15 Overview Industry supports Competition however it is critical to ensure that analysis of alternatives (AoA) consider total cost of ownership to gain best value sustainment: Status Quo Comparability Best Value is critical Risk is the forgotten element Government probability More than one customer Industry wants the DoD to adopt optimal sustainment solutions that are both affordable and executable we need to work together on these challenges as we move forward 15
16 Status Quo Only Cost Comparability The DoD AoA more times than not is an exercise of determining the current status quo cost The DoD seems to only look at the bottom line price when constructing AoA industry doesn t see many instances when value or cost avoidance is factored into the analysis Simply comparing proposal price PBL or another sustainment contract vehicle limits the DoD s ability to secure best value for warfighter requirements 16
17 Best Value is Critical to Sustainment Value brought to the AoA through engineering support is rarely captured in considering alternatives We are called back in to help the new source or the DoD when a problem arises Contractors (OEM s) use Field Service Engineers, Repair Engineers and Design Engineers to solve the problem quickly and efficiently and engineering value is often not included in the AOA 17
18 Risk is the Forgotten Element Risk is commonly misunderstood or overlooked In most sustainment proposals, we are asked to provide lower costs and improve performance The amount of risk to achieve better performance always drives cost to the USG - - Performance: Product Improvements Best Comm Practices - Quality: Refined work scope & experienced Artisans (Avionics) - Availability: RBOM piece part planning proficiency (Mechanical) - Cost: Awarding to Suppliers that sub contract the R&O or buy parts from the OEM why? 18 Switching cost risk should be the biggest area of concern for DoD
19 Government Probability The DoD AoA should develop a true alternative add more people, purchase additional equipment, implement different maintenance practices or fund reliability improvements and calculate the probability of achieving those metrics The DoD AoA does not calculate probability of government achieving the required performance metrics 19
20 More Than One Customer Multiple customers - the warfighter, PM, functional support teams (contracting, lawyers, policy experts) and when using a public-private partnership, depot leaders It is common that each customer has their own unique requirements (availability, reliability, Source of Repair, 50-50, CORE, and Better Buying Power) that often times conflict with lower price Example - when directed to transition work into the depot, the government s AoA s won t account for those costs or the functional experts remove that from the sustainment request for proposal 20
21 Challenges with Analysis of Alternatives Status Quo Comparability using only one alternative that calculus today s cost limits best value Best Value is critical - engineering value is often not included Risk is the forgotten element - always drives price often after the contract is in place Government probability AoA should calculate ability to achieve stated performance metrics More than one customer creates competing requirements that creates inefficiencies and drives cost Industry wants the DoD to adopt optimal sustainment solutions that are both affordable and executable we need to work together on these challenges as we move forward 21
22 Mr. Christopher Lowman Director for Maintenance Policy, Programs and Processes for US Army, Office of the Deputy of Staff, G-4 Mr. Jeff Sorenson Vice President and Partner, AT Kearny Colonel Christopher Coombs Chief, KC-46 Division, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas, Honeywell Mr. Dennis West Deputy Commander for Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command
23 COMFRC Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers Cost Comparability November 2014 Presented By: Mr. Dennis West
24 Mission/Deliverables Mission: Develop a common framework and methodology for the determination of costs and savings associated with consolidation of like and similar organic depot maintenance workloads Deliverables: Final recommendation on the analysis outcome for the APU workload Cost Comparability Manual with context on when and how to use Existing workloads with multiple sources of repair at organic depots New workload where competition between organic sites is warranted Future efficiencies FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 24
25 Cost Comparability Working Group Service Team Members (with the Service vote) Army Navy Air Force Marine Corps *Heather Knox/ Danita Daniels *Debbie Vergos (Team Lead) *Gene Pierce/ Gary Willey *John Reed/ Sheron Mathis Financial Representatives OSD *John Stankowski (Team Co- Lead) Navy Navy FRCE Air Force Air Force OO- ALC * Service Voting Member Mark Wagner Kemmy Morgan Christie Thompson Doyle Dittmore FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 25
26 Process Overview Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Standardized Cost Data Collection/ Data Call/ Internal Review Comparative Analysis Recurring Cost Analysis Non- Recurring Cost Analysis Report Results and Make Recommendation s Cost Comparability tool establishes a common framework and language for decision-making FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 26
27 Methodology Maintenance strategy and business rules are defined upfront Looks at total cost over three years Direct Labor Hours (DLHs) are the denominator, not units At the end of the process, a cost per hour is generated that can be compared to the billing/sales rate. This is the check and balance to ensure all costs are captured Cost Comparability is not a stand alone analysis process; it is intended to be used with other analytical processes and tools FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 27
28 Takeaways Cost comparability model has been developed and tested/tweaked Cost Comparability Handbook has been written and is in review Handbook is going through the required coordination before being signed and published All future efficiency studies will use this methodology for comparing recurring costs across organic sites for like/similar work FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 28
29 Mr. Christopher Lowman Director for Maintenance Policy, Programs and Processes for US Army, Office of the Deputy of Staff, G-4 Mr. Jeff Sorenson Vice President and Partner, AT Kearny Colonel Christopher Coombs Chief, KC-46 Division, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Mr. Heath Patrick Vice President, Defense Aftermarket Americas, Honeywell Mr. Dennis West Deputy Commander for Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval Air Systems Command
Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322. Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities
Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322 Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities Update for the DoD Maintenance Symposium Monday October 26, 2009 Phoenix, Arizona Goals For Today
More informationPerformance-Based Logistics
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY Performance-Based Logistics 31 August 2016 WARFIGHTER FIRST PEOPLE & CULTURE STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT FINANCIAL STEWARDSHIP PROCESS EXCELLENCE
More informationH-60 Seahawk Performance-Based Logistics Program (D )
August 1, 2006 Logistics H-60 Seahawk Performance-Based Logistics Program (D-2006-103) This special version of the report has been revised to omit contractor proprietary data. Department of Defense Office
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
More informationHQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES
HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M TO MCO 4000.56 dtd MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES 1. Please insert enclosure (1) pages 1 thru 7, pages were inadvertently left out during the printing
More informationReport to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017
Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
More informationThe Beginning. GEN Kern s Memo, 20 Aug 02 Creating Lean A Mgmt Tool for the Future. there is potential for great progress.
Lean The Beginning. GEN Kern s Memo, 20 Aug 02 Creating Lean A Mgmt Tool for the Future there is potential for great progress. WHY DO LEAN EVENTS? To put out a fire? Misconception!! For performance appraisals!
More informationWe acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan
The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications
More informationARS 2004 San Diego, California, USA
ARS 2004 San Diego, California, USA The Challenge of Supporting Aging Naval Weapon Systems RDML Michael C. Bachman Assistant Commander for Aviation Logistics Naval Air Systems Command PRESENTATION SLIDES
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 4: Advanced Component Development
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4151.22 October 16, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 19, 2018 SUBJECT: Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM + ) for Materiel Maintenance References:
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Office of Secretary
More informationStrategic Cost Reduction
Strategic Cost Reduction American Society of Military Comptrollers May 29, 2014 Agenda Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Budget Uncertainty Efficiencies History Specific Efficiency Examples 2 Cost
More informationGAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate July 2011 AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND Budgeting
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationDefense Logistics and Materiel Readiness Summit
Defense Logistics and Materiel Readiness Summit Maintaining Support for Continued Global Operations May 22-23, 2012 Mary M. Gates Learning Center, Alexandria, VA Featured Speakers Include: Sue Dryden,
More informationTHE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS
DOD INSTRUCTION 4151.20 DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES DETERMINATION PROCESS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: May 4, 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationCOMFRC. Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers. 07 Dec Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers. Presented to: Attendees, 2016 DoD Maintenance Symposium
5 COMFRC Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers 07 Dec 2016 Presented to: Attendees, 2016 DoD Maintenance Symposium Presented by: Capt. Chuck Stuart Fleet Readiness Center
More informationSoftware Sustainment: Continuous Engineering to
Software Sustainment: Continuous Engineering to Deliver Warfighter Capability Michael H. McLendon (SEI) John Stankowski (OSD) Dr. Forrest Shull (SEI) Stephany Bellomo (SEI) Software Engineering Institute
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationa GAO GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION DOD Should Strengthen Policies for Assessing Technical Data Needs to Support Weapon Systems
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2006 WEAPONS ACQUISITION DOD Should Strengthen Policies for Assessing Technical Data Needs to Support Weapon Systems
More informationBe clearly linked to strategic and contingency planning.
DODD 4151.18. March 31, 2004 This Directive applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of
More informationDHA & DLA-TS Supported MEDLOG Shared Services Update for AMSUS-SM September 16,
CAPT Bernie Poindexter (DHA) Ms. Geneva Polini (DLA-TS) DHA & DLA-TS Supported MEDLOG Shared Services Update for AMSUS-SM September 16, 1 DHA Vision A joint, integrated, premier system of health, supporting
More informationIt s All about the Money!
2011 DOD Maintenance Symposium Breakout Session: It s All about the Money! Chien Huo, Ph.D. Force and Infrastructure Analysis Division (FIAD) Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Office of the
More informationGAO. DEPOT MAINTENANCE The Navy s Decision to Stop F/A-18 Repairs at Ogden Air Logistics Center
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable James V. Hansen, House of Representatives December 1995 DEPOT MAINTENANCE The Navy s Decision to Stop F/A-18 Repairs at Ogden Air Logistics
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1348.30 November 27, 2013 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Instruction
More informationAir Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan
2012 Air Force Enterprise Corrosion Prevention and Control Strategic Plan 5/21/2012 Table of Contents Purpose and Scope... 3 Background... 3 Purpose... 3 Scope... 4 Strategic Direction... 4 Vision... 4
More informationHeadquarters U.S. Air Force. Ensuring An Adequate Infrastructure To Execute Assigned Maintenance Workload
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Ensuring An Adequate Infrastructure To Execute Assigned Maintenance Workload Jan Mulligan, Deputy Chief Maintenance Management Division HQ USAF Logistics, Installations & Mission
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4140.67 April 26, 2013 Incorporating Change 1, October 25, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Counterfeit Prevention Policy References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) DETERMINATION PROCESS
DOD INSTRUCTION 4151.24 DEPOT SOURCE OF REPAIR (DSOR) DETERMINATION PROCESS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: October
More informationReport to Congress on Recommendations and Actions Taken to Advance the Role of the Chief of Naval Operations in the Development of Requirements, Acquisition Processes and Associated Budget Practices. The
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6015.17 January 13, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, November 30, 2017 SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Facility Portfolio Management References: See Enclosure
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-3000 PR MARINE CORPS ORDER 5220.13 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 90-16 31 AUGUST 2011 Special Management STUDIES AND ANALYSES, ASSESSMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
More informationReport on Feasibility, Costs, and Potential Benefits of Scaling the Military Acuity Model
Report on Feasibility, Costs, and Potential Benefits of Scaling the Military Acuity Model June 2017 Requested by: House Report 114-139, page 280, which accompanies H.R. 2685, the Department of Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justification Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Actual Total Program Element (PE)
More informationhttps://www.metricsthatmatter.com/url/u.aspx?0cbf11b3e Guest Presenter Jay Bottelson
Defense Acquisition University Lunch n Learn Navy VAMOSC 12 April 2017 Session will start at 1230 EDT (1130 CDT). Audio will be through DCS there will be a sound check 30 minutes prior to the session.
More informationDevelopment Planning Working Group Update
Development Planning Working Group Update Ms. Aileen Sedmak Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 16th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Arlington, VA October
More information1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3050.27 N81 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3050.27 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: FORCE STRUCTURE
More informationDepartment of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003
Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table 1.0 Department of Defense Secondary Supply System Inventories A. Secondary Items - FY 1973 through FY 2003
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
More informationTWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges
TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges 2012 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Conference 6 February 2012 Mr. Christopher Lowman Maintenance Directorate, G-4 Headquarters, Department of the Army
More informationF-35 Sustainment Lockheed Martin Corporation
Approved for public release JSF14-569 AER201405004/Australia Industry Forum ; 21 May 2014 F-35 Sustainment 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation A hard copy of this document may not be the document currently
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES DEFENSE ACQUISITION REFORM PANEL UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: MISSION OF THE AIR FORCE GLOBAL LOGISTICS SUPPORT
More informationNAVAIR News Release AIR-6.0 Public Affairs Patuxent River, MD
Marine Corps Deputy Commandant for Aviation Jon Dog Davis and Brig. Gen. Greg Masiello, Commander for Logistics and Industrial Operations, Naval Air Systems Command (AIR-6.0) discuss how CBM+ can increase
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 32.797 23.511
More informationThis is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!
1 The Capability Production Document (or CPD) is one of the most important things to come out of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase. It defines an increment of militarily useful, logistically
More information2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective
2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference OSD Perspective Jose M. Gonzalez OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions Discussion
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 3200.14, Volume 2 January 5, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Principles and Operational Parameters of the DoD Scientific and Technical
More informationOPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.349 DNS OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.349 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
MARINE CORPS ORDER 44 0 0.2 00 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 4400.200 JAN 1 8 2012 From: Commandant of the Marine
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5420.199 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1 000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 5420.199 DUSN (M) From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of the Navy NAVAL INNOVATION
More informationUnited States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees February 2005 MILITARY PERSONNEL DOD Needs to Conduct a Data- Driven Analysis of Active Military Personnel Levels Required
More informationresource allocation decisions.
Remarks by Dr. Donald C. Winter Secretary of Navy National Defense Industry Association 2006 Naval Science and Technology Partnership Conference Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Washington, D.C. Wednesday August
More informationStrike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory MIT and ONR Objectives Office of Naval Research (ONR), PMR-51 Coordinates, executes, and promotes the S&T programs of the Navy and Marine Corps.
More informationDepartment of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5105.84 May 11, 2012 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DCAPE) References: See Enclosure 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Assigns the
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - - 93.867-93.867 158.218 315.238 397.880
More informationDefense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Systems Engineering Chapter Update Ms. Aileen Sedmak Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 15th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
More informationTotal Ownership Cost. CAPT Tom Ryan OPNAV N414
Total Ownership Cost CAPT Tom Ryan OPNAV N414 1 Quotes Increased fiscal pressures mandate that we scrupulously examine all activities and accounts and ensure that our limited resources are appropriately
More informationMEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:
MEDIA CONTACTS Mailing Address: Defense Contract Management Agency Attn: Public Affairs Office 3901 A Avenue Bldg 10500 Fort Lee, VA 23801 Phone: Media Relations: (804) 734-1492 FOIA Requests: (804) 734-1466
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8260.04 December 18, 2009 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Support to DoD Strategic Analysis References: (a) DoD Directive 5124.02, Under Secretary
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: Distribution Process Owner (DPO) NUMBER 5158.06 July 30, 2007 Incorporating Administrative Change 1, September 11, 2007 USD(AT&L) References: (a) Unified Command
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Logistics Modernization Program Increment 2 (LMP Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3100.4 PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3100.4 From: To: Subj: Commandant of the Marine Corps
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8011.9C N81 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8011.9C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVAL MUNITIONS
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
More informationINSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES DOD Access to Intellectual Property for Sustainment of Weapon Systems Richard Van Atta, Project Leader Royce Kneece Michael Lippitz Christina Patterson August 11, 2017 --
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5105.72 April 26, 2016 DCMO SUBJECT: Defense Technology Security Administration (DTSA) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive reissues DoD Directive
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.60 July 18, 2014 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Defense Industrial Base Assessments References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This instruction reissues DoD Instruction 5000.60
More informationAcquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006
March 3, 2006 Acquisition Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D-2006-059) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Report
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: DoD Munitions Requirements Process (MRP) References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 3000.04 September 24, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L) 1.
More informationFrequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)
Frequently Asked Questions 2012 Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) The Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Human Resources Strategic Assessment
More informationThis publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 21-1 25 FEBRUARY 2003 Maintenance AIR AND SPACE MAINTENANCE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY NOTICE: This publication
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Missile Defense Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Missile Defense Agency
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003
COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 2865 Manufacturing Technology 55,694 44,381 39,396 40,112 39,505 40,157 40,787 41,336
More informationDepartment of Defense
Department of Defense Environmental Management Systems Compliance Management Plan November 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 I. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. DOD ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 5
More informationMission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
More informationDoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps Logistics Chain Management Increment 1 (GCSS-MC LCM Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 P-1 Line #50
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force Date: February 2016 3010F: Aircraft Procurement, Air Force / BA 05: Modification of Inservice Aircraft / BSA 5: Other Aircraft ID Code (A=Service
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. 1. PURPOSE. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) (Reference (a)), this Instruction:
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4715.17 April 15, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, November 16, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Environmental Management Systems References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In
More informationDefense Health Agency PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTION
Defense Health Agency PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6025.08 Healthcare Operations/Pharmacy SUBJECT: Pharmacy Enterprise Activity (EA) References: See Enclosure 1. 1. PURPOSE. This Defense Health Agency-Procedural
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationOSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605804D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Program Element (PE) Cost 9.155 18.550 20.396
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line Item #30 To Program Element 25.144
More informationGAO DEFENSE INVENTORY. Navy Logistics Strategy and Initiatives Need to Address Spare Parts Shortages
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives June 2003 DEFENSE INVENTORY Navy Logistics Strategy and
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Mission Planning System Increment 5 (MPS Inc 5) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common
More informationGAO. BASE OPERATIONS Challenges Confronting DOD as It Renews Emphasis on Outsourcing
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Readiness, Committee on National Security House of Representatives March 1997 BASE OPERATIONS Challenges Confronting
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
More informationThe Current State of Performance Based Logistics and Public-Private Partnerships for Depot-Level Maintenance: Operating Models, Outcomes, and Issues
The Current State of Performance Based Logistics and Public-Private Partnerships for Depot-Level Maintenance: Operating Models, Outcomes, and Issues By: Jacques S. Gansler, William Lucyshyn, Lisa H. Harrington,
More informationNumber: DI-MGMT Approval Date:
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Technical Data Report Number: DI-MGMT-82165 Approval Date: 20171116 AMSC Number: 9871 Limitation: DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: CAPE Project
More informationDEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY THE NATION S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY THE NATION S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DLA Information Operations (J6) AFCEA Mr. Robert Foster Deputy Director, DLA Information Operations April 4, 2018 WARFIGHTER FIRST
More informationExecuting our Maritime Strategy
25 October 2007 CNO Guidance for 2007-2008 Executing our Maritime Strategy The purpose of this CNO Guidance (CNOG) is to provide each of you my vision, intentions, and expectations for implementing our
More informationJacksonville Defense Business Conference
Jacksonville Defense Business Conference - 2015 Doing Business with Military Bases in Florida Tuesday - July 28, 2015 7:30am - 4:00pm University of North Florida (Herbert Conference Center) 12000 Alumni
More informationDefense Logistics Agency
Defense Logistics Agency BRAC 2005 DLR Procurement Road Ahead Mr. Stephen E. Rodocker 27-29 Aug 07 1 Agenda BRAC Initiatives Implementation Strategy Strategic Sourcing Overview Challenges Progress Questions
More informationWhere Sustainment Meets Deployed Forces
Where Sustainment Meets Deployed Forces Do You Really Know Who s Going to Maintain Your Aircraft and Where It s Going to be Maintained? Cmdr. Mark Nieto Ann Wood Mike Kotzian Duane Mallicoat 28 Did you
More information