Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II
|
|
|
- Lydia Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II Success and Challenges of Distributed Testing Mr. Timothy Menke Technical Director ASC/XRA (SIMAF) Wright-Patterson AFB OH timothy.menke@wpafb.af.mil 1
2 Briefing Roadmap Air Force Integrated Collaborative Environment (AF-ICE) AGILE Fire Phase II Customers Executing Organizations/Supporting Organizations Customer Successes in Distributed Testing Distributed Testing Challenges Distributed Testing Requirements Questions
3 AF-ICE Air Force Integrated Collaborative Environments (AF-ICE) An LVC capability for acquisition & testing Analytical Rigor is a foundational element Provide decision quality data for decision support AGILE Fire is SAF/A6 sponsored event with significant contributions from the AGILE partnership AF-ICE: An integration and interoperability range efficient, effective, validated
4 AGILE Fire Theme/Objective Theme: Explore system interoperability integration procedures and information exchange requirements within and between space, air and ground domains to execute operational realistic mission threads Objective: Provide a venue for capturing data based on project requirements and to facilitate planning, technical discussions, to construct a robust integrated Live, Virtual, and Constructive (LVC) environment solution with the main goal to collect analytically relevant data for decision support. Analytical Rigor to support Decision Makers
5 AGILE FIRE Ph II OV-1 Cleared for Public Release: 88ABW , 12 October
6 AGILE Fire Ph II Customers Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL) AFMC/Electronic Systems Center (ESC), SAF/A6W Gateway AFMC/ESC; Air Force Command and Control Integration Center (AFC2IC) AFATDS TACP CASS PM AFATDS/TACP-CASS/Ft Sill FSC Joint Air Ground Integration Cell (JAGIC) ACC/A3D USAF OPR Joint and Combined Integration (JACI) USA OPR Dynamic Air Space Management AFMC/ESC-PM TBMCS/PM TAIS/PM AFATDS Counter Rocket Artillery and Mortar (C-RAM) PEO C3T/PD- CRAM Net-Enabled Weapon (NEW) NEW Interoperability Working Group (NEWIG), SAF/A6W Capability Net Centric Test & Training (CNCTT) 505th Command Control Wing (CCW) AGILE III s Schedule AGILE III s execution is planned for February 2011 Cleared for Public Release: 88ABW , 12 October
7 Executing Organizations ASC/XRA Simulation and Analysis Facility (SIMAF) 46 th TW 46 th Test Squadron/Command & Control Test Facility Guided Weapons Evaluation Facility (GWEF) ESC 653 rd Electronic Systems Wing, Enterprise Integration Division 505 th CCW 605 th Test & Evaluation Squadron/Capability for Net-Centric Test and Training Air Force Command and Control Integration Center (AFC2IC) Central Technical Support Facility (CTSF) White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) USAF USA 7
8 Supporting Organizations Joint Air-Ground Integration Cell (JAGIC) ACC/A3D 712 th Air Support Operations Squadron Joint and Combined Integration (JACI) Fires Center of Excellence (FCoE) TRADOC Capability Manager, Fire Support C3 (TCM-FSC3) PEO C3T/PD CRAM Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (C-RAM) Program Directorate Program Manager AFATDS Program Manager TAIS Program Manager TACP-CASS Net Enabled Weapon Interoperability Working Group (NEWIWG) JFCOM/J8 J84 Capability Test & Evaluation Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability Team (JFIIT) Program Executive Office Integration Product Manager (PM) Joint Interagency Multinational Interoperability (JIMI) Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Interoperability Test & Evaluation Capability (InterTEC) 8
9 AGILE FIRE II CUSTOMER SUCCESSES
10 AFATDS TACP CASS VMF Current issues with integration of two software systems Army system for prosecuting targets using surface fires Air Force system for prosecuting targets using CAS AGILE Fire provided backdrop for risk reduction testing of new software versions to allow interoperability between systems. First time the two actual systems were interfaced issues found and actions recorded to take back to AFATDS and TACP-CASS system engineers to include in next software revision Improvements will be tested in Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) subsequent AGILE Fire events Tactical Air Control Party Close Air Support System (TACP CASS)
11 Dynamic Airspace Management (DASM) Warfighter Problem: Lack of ability to dynamically integrate airspace C2 and fires over and within a Ground Commander s Area of Operation DASM utilizes TBMCS, TAIS and AFATDS to rapidly deconflict airspace for air or ground use During AGILE Fire II DASM prototype exceeded expectations Positive effect on speed of integration Increased speed of deconfliction Particular note made of ability to deconflict rockets used in joint airspace Future AGILE Fire events will be used to influence development of emerging TTPs and C2 systems Theater Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) Tactical Airspace Integration System (TAIS) Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS)
12 AGILE Fire II Successes AGILE Team has matured the distributed event process making it easier to systematically execute distributed LVC events (planning, integration and execution) Positive Impacts to numerous programs; results in combat! JMETC has proven to be a reliable network for AGILE Efficient & collaborative use of Joint analytical resources (in addition to service capabilities) Assess systems/capabilities with joint application (e.g. DASM) Capture data, conduct analysis and reporting AF-ICE PE for sustainment of the developing environment Facilitation team, continuity, distributed execution Technical Joint Windows Warfare Assessment Model (JWINWAM) configuration and software support 12
13 AGILE Fire II Challenges (1/2) Information Assurance Services/systems adhere to different standards, policy and procedures Time to achieve a C&A for tools/models/systems Modified DIACAP (MDIP) to establish a DAA authority able to adjudicate non approved software for use in the RDT&E environment Event Control /Management Tools V&V of distributed environments Bringing on New participants 13
14 AGILE Fire II Challenges (2/2) Planning management IA strictures and documentation requirements are changing more rapidly than procedures and techniques to meet them Technical and Operational architectures for both tactical-system realism and commensurate instrumentation - continue to increase in detail, scope, and complexity Planning the Operational contexts and technical environments is becoming more SME-specific, and man-hour intensive Un-synchronized (tools and technique) collaboration, across Service and vendor ranges and labs, using non-integrated process-management, creates continuous detail and versioning errors (distributed man-hours) (Requirement: need a tool like Team-Center SE across the enterprise) Continues to be a discovery effort across the Enterprise Real-Time Analysis capability continues as an underlying imperative Exploration and development of tools and techniques is often discouraged by (local and installation) Security mandates and objectives are currently imposed upon even the RDT&E environment Sharing of GOT s SW tools across the Enterprise is often stopped short by Security, licensing, and inadequate support 14
15 AGILE Fire II Requirements Central Tool Host/Repository: Have tools provided at a central location ADOBE, Chat, SharePoint Formalized LVC V&V: V&V of LVC environment characteristics and customer interactions needs to be formalized Training: A process for educating organizations new to distributed LVC testing Process to support rapid C&A of tools for use in the RDT&E LVC environment 15
16 AGILE Fire II Requirements Dedicated documentation of the AF-ICE/AGILE Fire joint distributed test environment Documentation of the AF-ICE playbook as it relates to specific AGILE events Data mining of customer project plans and reports to support various data calls Products include: AF-ICE overall TAP, briefings, playbook, Information management Book_boss Standardized, reusable products: test run matrix, mission threads, analysis plan, DMAP/DCAP, spiral plans, comm./chat/optask instructions, player list, ports and protocols, site architectures and environment architecture, Joint Collaboration Tool to support System Engineering process and products across the Distributed LVC Enterprise
17 Requirements to support Joint Interoperability Testing Automated DIS/TENA compliance tool (could be part of environment VV&A) Need a System Model Availability & Accreditation repository and authority Where do the services obtain models of the other service systems? Who authenticates the models for interoperability test purposes? Need for Radio/Terminal, Network, Application, and Propagation models Who does the V&V and accredits the models for use? Consensus on how we model communication effects in a distributed environment Need for a standard communication server?
18 Summary AGILE is a cost effective venue using LVC for distributed testing of air and ground Integration/Interoperability Proven itself to its customers/many successes JMETC has demonstrated its value and reliability over a series of events during the last three years Challenges remain in the areas of maturing these types of venues to support the growing requirement for integrated system of systems assessment and testing
Aeronautical Systems Center
Aeronautical Systems Center Engineering for War Fighter Integration of Net- Centric Systems Presentation to the 13 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 27 October 2010 Ms. Eileen Bjorkman SAF/A6W Pentagon,
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview Prepared for ITEA Test & Evaluation (T&E) of System of Systems (SoS) Conference 24-27 January 2012 Mr Jesse Flores Test Engineer / JICO 46TS/OGEJ (Jacobs/TYBRIN)
MANAGING LARGE DISTRIBUTED DATA SETS FOR TESTING IN A JOINT ENVIRONMENT
MANAGING LARGE DISTRIBUTED DATA SETS FOR TESTING IN A JOINT ENVIRONMENT Thomas Bock thomas.bock@jte.osd.mil Tonya Easley tonya.easley@jte.osd.mil John Hoot Gibson john.gibson@jte.osd.mil Joint Test and
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 5.829 5.779 5.699-5.699 5.762 5.881 6.046 6.124 Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 0.000 35.533
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 22.113 15.501 10.448-10.448 19.601 18.851
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training
Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training Joint Theater Level Simulation Global Operations Don Weter, CIV Joint Staff J7 Environment Operations Division JTLS & JCATS Program Manager M&S Analysis
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 19.873 20.466 20.954 0.000 20.954 21.254 21.776 22.071 22.305 Continuing Continuing 771: Link-16
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0203726A Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to Program Element
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 2 - Applied Research 0602308A - Advanced Concepts and Simulation COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE and Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Actual Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #222
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+) #
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207434F PE TITLE: Link 16 Support and Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
COE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force
COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES Generating Force COE Enables Increased Capability Agility Reduced Life Cycle Costs Flexible Standards-based Infrastructure Enhanced Cyber Protection Command Post Data
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 16-1002 1 JUNE 2000 Operations Support MODELING AND SIMULATION (M&S) SUPPORT TO ACQUISITION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)
U.S. ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) MG John W. Charlton 8 November 2017 Mission What does ATEC do for the Army? ATEC plans, integrates,
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A
IFPC Inc 2-I DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 31 IFPC Inc 2-I Mission Mission: Primary Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 Intercept (IFPC Inc
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 8320.2 December 2, 2004 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: Data Sharing in a Net-Centric Department of Defense References: (a) DoD Directive 8320.1, DoD Data Administration,
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207701F PE TITLE: Full Combat Mission Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
Interoperability Test & Evaluation Capability (InterTEC) Application of InterTEC Capabilities in Test and Training Events
Interoperability Test & Evaluation Capability (InterTEC) Application of InterTEC Capabilities in Test and Training Events InterTEC T E Inter operability T & E C apability OSD-funded, NAVAIR led project
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 23.812 29.5 32.556-32.556 33.14 3.238 28.483
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207445F PE TITLE: FIGHTER TACTICAL DATA Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Adv Field Artillery Tactical Data System
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Program Element 29.127 24.622 29.546-29.546 24.448 24.593 24.444
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207434F PE TITLE: Link 16 Support and Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED The Joint Staff Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #107
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Complete Program Element 0.000 3.230 7.402 7.002-7.002 6.839 6.938 7.086 7.086 Continuing Continuing P787:
THE JOINT STAFF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense-Wide Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Budget Estimates
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 R-1 Line Item Nomenclature: 227 0902298J Management HQ ($ IN Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Total PE 3.078
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2016 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 0.000 24.500 23.016-23.016 25.350 26.026
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 1.425 29.831 14.926-14.926 24.806 25.592 26.083
Joint Terminal Control Training & Rehearsal System (JTC TRS)
Joint Terminal Control Training & Rehearsal System (JTC TRS) Lt Col Dan Hodgkiss 677 AESG/TO 937 255 3801 daniel.hodgkiss@wpafb.af.mil Date: 15 May 2007 Government disclaimer: all information is provided
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 22.756 - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing 675043: Fighter Tactical
Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010
Building Next Generation Range Capabilities Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010 1 Test Resource Management Center (TRMC)
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Army Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #54 To Complete Total
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element P857: Joint Deployable Analysis Team (JDAT)
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Total Program Element 6.541 6.405 7.102 - - - - - - - - 20.048 P857:
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
Capability Integration
SoS/Interoperability IPT Integrating Lockheed Martin Strengths Realizing Military Value Integration Framework for Developing C4ISTAR Solutions Dr David Sundstrom Director, Network Centric 21 September
Joint Test and Evaluation Program
Joint Test and Evaluation Program The primary objective of the Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) program is to provide rapid solutions to operational deficiencies identified by the joint military community.
Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama
Cybersecurity As the birthplace of the Internet, the United States has a special responsibility to lead a networked world. Prosperity and security increasingly depend on an open, interoperable, secure,
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE Sensor Tech COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1322.18 January 13, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 23, 2017 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Military Training References: (a) DoD Directive 1322.18, subject as
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
JAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide
by MAJ James P. Kane Jr. JAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide The emphasis placed on readying the Army for a decisive-action (DA) combat scenario has been felt throughout the force in recent years. The Chief
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems
ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 111 116 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems Stephen F. Conley U.S. Army Evaluation Center,
Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 6th Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium February 13-14, 2018: Mary M. Gates Learning Center 701 N. Fairfax St. Alexandria,
Operational Testing: From Basics to System-of- Systems Capabilities
ITEA Journal 2011; 32: 39 51 Operational Testing: From Basics to System-of- Systems Capabilities Col Michael W. Kometer, Ph.D. School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, Maxwell AFB, Alabama Kent Burkhart
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 4.846 3.825 4.316-4.316 3.813 3.582 3.336 3.379 Continuing Continuing
Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization - Mission -
Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization - Mission - The Joint Improvised Threat Defeat Organization (JIDO) enables Department of Defense actions to counter improvised-threats with tactical responsiveness
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Program Element 15.31 15.787 13.926-13.926 13.92 14.19 14.43
GLOBAL INFORMATION GRID NETOPS TASKING ORDERS (GNTO) WHITE PAPER.
. Introduction This White Paper advocates United States Strategic Command s (USSTRATCOM) Joint Task Force Global Network Operations (JTF-GNO) and/or AF Network Operations (AFNETOPS) conduct concept and
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004
PE NUMBER: 27438F PE TITLE: Theater Battle Management Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 24 7 Operational System Development 27438F Theater Battle Management Cost ($ in Millions) 23
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) ARMY COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS) (TIARA) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Improving Distributed Test Capabilities NDIA Annual T&E Conference
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Improving Distributed Test Capabilities NDIA Annual T&E Conference Chip Ferguson Program Manager March 16, 2011 Agenda TRMC Distributed Testing What is
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address
The Role of T&E in the Systems Engineering Process Keynote Address August 17, 2004 Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Top Priorities 1. 1. Successfully Successfully Pursue Pursue the the Global
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.05 August 18, 2011 Incorporating Change 1, November 22, 2017 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO DoD CIO SUBJECT: Electromagnetic Spectrum Data Sharing References: See Enclosure
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #142 To Complete Total
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000
PE NUMBER: 0604740F PE TITLE: Integrated Command & Control BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000 PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST ($ in Thousands) Actual FY 2002 FY
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense. JWARN Description
Overview Mr. Chuck Walker JWARN Acquisition Program Manager Joint Project Manager Information Systems (858) 537-0215 chuck.walker@jpmis.mil 1 2 JWARN Description Connects CBRN sensors directly to Joint
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 3.350 3.874 - - - 1.977 - - - Continuing Continuing 645121: Physical
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Military Engineering Advanced Technology
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
Making the Case for Distributed Testing
ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 347 354 Making the Case for Distributed Testing Bernard Chip Ferguson Test Resource Management Center, Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program, Arlington, Virginia
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 752.328 704.475 722.071-722.071 701.000 702.979 716.873 725.979
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 2.885
Briefing for Industry
Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico Briefing for Industry Mr. Quentin Saulter Naval Representative High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office August 18, 2015 DISTRIBUTION D: Distribution
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Complete Program Element 0.000 0.000 5.013 12.652-12.652 12.895 12.982 13.020 13.231 Continuing Continuing
Headquarters U. S. Air Force. The Air Force s Perspective
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e The Air Force s Perspective Mr. Jack Manclark Phone: 703-697-4774 or DSN 227-4774 E-mail: John.Manclark@pentagon.af.mil
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY1999 Actual FY 2002 FY 2003 FY2004 FY2005 to Program Element (PE) 33993 38970 33420 37335 35713 23230 23441 Continuing Continuing
Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview
1 Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview 25 October 2005 Dr. Jerry Hoffman JOEF Acquisition Program Manager jerome.hoffman@navy.mil 2 Background PROGRAM SUMMARY: Enables warfighters
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 205 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name)
ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield
Headquarters Air Combat Command ACC/C2ISR Delivering Desired Effects on the Battlefield Col Tom Wozniak ACC/A8C 25 July 2006 This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Overview Tactical Level Programs TTNT, TACP,
Implementing a COI Service Joint COI Data Implementation
Implementing a COI Service Joint COI Data Implementation CAPT Mike Salvato USJFCOM J68 Net Centric Operations, Interoperability & Systems Integration Conference 24 Mar 05 1 The Joint Battlespace Data Challenge
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational s Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.02 August 5, 2013 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Sharing Data, Information, and Information Technology (IT) Services in the Department of Defense References: See Enclosure
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands) PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE FY 2000 ACTUAL FY 2001 ESTIMATE FY 2002 ESTIMATE ** ** 83,557 CONT. ** The Science and Technology Program Elements (PEs) were restructured in FY