Supporting Rapid Acquisition with Speed and Agility
|
|
- Clifton Lawrence
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 34th Annual ITEA Symposium: T&E in a Time of Risk and Change Supporting Rapid Acquisition with Speed and Agility Mr. Derrick Hinton Acting Director Test Resource Management Center 5 October 2017
2 2 Topics of Discussion TRMC Overview Rapid Acquisition (RA) Defined Alternative Pathways for Acquisition Sample RA Use Case Characteristics of the RA Process Required Characteristics of T&E Infrastructure to Support RA Identifying and Overcoming Challenges Ultimate Vision Points of Contact
3 TRMC Overview 3
4 TRMC Organization As of 1 Oct 2017 Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics The Honorable Ellen M. Lord Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Director, TRMC Mr. G. Derrick Hinton (Acting) Deputy EA for Cyber Test Ranges PM, NCR Complex Expansion Principal Deputy, TRMC Ms. Sheila Wright (Acting) Deputy PM, NCR Complex Expansion Deputy Director, T&E Range Oversight Deputy Director, Major Initiatives and Technical Analyses PM, T&E/S&T // PM, JMETC Agency Range Oversight Air Force Range Oversight PM, CTEIP Director, TENA SDA Director, NCR Complex Army Range Oversight Navy Range Oversight Deputy PM, CTEIP PM, REP Deputy PM, T&E/S&T Deputy PM, JMETC Deputy Director, NCR Complex 4
5 TRMC Missions (1 of 2) DoD (Charter) Directive MRTFB OVERSIGHT / T&E INFRASTRUCTURE Plan for and assess the adequacy of the MRTFB to provide adequate testing in support of the development, acquisition, fielding, and sustainment of defense systems Support the Department s objective of ensuring compliance with DoDD R Review proposed significant changes to T&E facilities and resources of the MRTFB before they are implemented by the DoD Components Issue guidance to the DoD Components, through the USD(AT&L), with respect to MRTFB planning Maintain an awareness of other T&E facilities and resources, within and outside the DoD, and their impacts on DoD requirements Serve as Executive Agent for Cyber Test Ranges STRATEGIC PLAN Complete a strategic plan for T&E not less often than once every 2 fiscal years Statutory Regulatory 5
6 TRMC Missions (2 of 2) DoD (Charter) Directive BUDGET CERTIFICATION Submit report to the SECDEF containing the comments of the Director concerning all such proposed budgets, together with the Director s certification as to whether such proposed budgets are adequate PROGRAMS Administer the CTEIP (Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program) and T&E/S&T Program CAPABILITIES Manage and operate the JMETC (Joint Mission Environment Test Capability) Multiple Independent Levels of Security (MILS) Network and the Regional Service Delivery Points (RSDP) cloud computing environments Manage and operate the NCR (National Cyber Range) (IAW RMD 407A1, Issue #1, Title: Cyber, Jan 12, 2015) to provide test capability and capacity for the T&E Community Statutory Regulatory 6
7 Rapid Acquisition (RA) Defined 7
8 Rapid Acquisition (RA) Defined 8 CJCSI I, 23 January 2015, Glossary page GL-7: Rapid Acquisition A streamlined and tightly integrated iterative approach, acting upon validated urgent or emergent capability requirements, to: conduct analysis and evaluate alternatives contract using all available statutory and regulatory authorities and waivers and deviations of such, appropriate to the situation; identify and minimize technical development,..; and rapidly produce and deliver required capabilities.
9 Alternative Pathways for Acquisition 9
10 10 A New Acquisition Pathway Today, the DoD predominately uses two acquisition pathways that are well understood and used regularly: Major Defense Acquisition Programs (DoDI ) Urgent/Emerging Operational Needs (DoDD ) DoD s response to Congress on NDAA FY 2017 section 901, requiring the re-org of AT&L, states: in today's near-peer competitive environment, DoD needs alternative pathways to acquire capabilities FY 2016 NDAA provided such an additional pathway: Middle Tier Acquisition
11 Current DoD Policy on Rapid Acquisition 11 DoDD , August 24, 2012, Rapid Fulfillment of Combatant Commander Urgent Operational Needs DoD s highest priority is to provide warfighters involved in conflict or preparing for imminent contingency operations with the capabilities urgently needed to overcome unforeseen threats, achieve mission success, and reduce risk of casualties. DoDI February 02, 2017 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Rapid Fielding of Capabilities Enclosure 13, URGENT CAPABILITY ACQUISITION CJCSI I January 23, 2015 Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System Complies with PUBLIC LAW DEC. 2, 2002 BOB STUMP NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 SEC RAPID ACQUISITION AND DEPLOYMENT PROCEDURES.
12 Sample RA Use Case 12
13 13
14 Characteristics of the RA Process 14
15 Characteristics of the RA Process Global Hawk Examples: Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Office Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles Predator Hellfire Missiles Accepts greater risk than deliberate process Includes rapid development, rapid prototyping, and/or rapid procurement and rapid fielding Synchronizes abbreviated requirements, resourcing and tailored processes and eliminates approval layers Deviates from and/or waives authorities RA delivery includes a CONOP refinement effort after equipment delivery RA organization assists with operationalizing solutions Includes an operational assessment Iterative process; leads to spiral development Solution includes a training element Initial sustainment generally includes Field Service Representatives Adapted from Chris O Donnell (D,JRAC) Rapid Acquisition brief to Product Support Manager Workshop on 8 June
16 Required Characteristics of T&E Infrastructure to Support RA 16
17 Global Hawk Required Characteristics of T&E Infrastructure to Support RA Examples: Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Office Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles Predator Hellfire Missiles T&E must rapidly present environments, targets, threats using: Modeling and Simulation o Red, Blue, and Gray digital intel packages to rapidly integrate and update profiles into simulations o Rapid virtualization of system under test o Common protocols across all M&S and T&E activities Hardware in the Loop & Installed System Test Facilities o Maximize digital/modular interfaces for rapid reconfiguration Open Air Ranges o Core of peer competitors order of battle laydown established o Digital/reconfigurable emulators o Contract authority Real time Data Collection and Presentation o Big data mining o High-speed analysis tools for rapid transition of data to reports 17
18 Rapid Acquisition Test Infrastructure Enablers 18 When speed of delivery is a driving priority, program leadership needs to assess the ability of a candidate range not only to provide technical services, but also to deliver those services and critical administrative enabling functions at a speed acceptable to the fielding requirement.
19 To Support RA Programs, an MRTFB Must 19 Have agile internal processes and procedures Have modeling and simulation support services Be configurable to support RA (ISTFs) Be able to develop and produce tailored T&E products Be able to develop tactics, techniques and procedures concurrent with T&E Be able to begin immediate construction of infrastructure Be able to clear non-traditional air vehicles in time to support RA
20 and Must Also Have the Following Already in Place 20 A variety of funding constructs for RA Appropriate contract vehicles to support immediate activity Environmental Impact Clearances for intended T&E Special Use airspace Spectrum allocations (in place or immediately resolvable) Rapidly configurable Govt and contractor workforce TS/TS-SCI billets and workspaces for Govt, contractors, and foreign partners
21 T&E Infrastructure Support Missile engagement effectiveness requires successful execution of all segments of the offensive kill chain Emulate necessary environment Accept higher risk Demonstrate performance Iterate M&S - DIADS - ITASE - JSE - Etc Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) HWIL / ISTF Rapidly configurable environment Programmable threats EA-18G F-35 Dynamic Targets (5) OAR Teaming Arrangements Transportable Instrumentation Programmable & Mobile Threats MILCON Waiver 21
22 Identifying and Overcoming Challenges 22
23 23 Common Range Instrumentation Challenges & Solutions Challenges Solutions Increasing RF spectrum demand Increasing demand for data accuracy and precision Increasing data quantity driving network and storage capacity SUTs driving need for miniaturization and modularity Common hardware and standards for telemetry and TSPI CTEIP Projects o o o Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) Integrated Network Enhanced Telemetry (inet) Advanced Range Tracking and Imaging System (ARTIS) Supporting T&E/S&T Efforts o Spectrum Efficient Technology Efforts ULTIMATE GOAL: Wireless Inter-Range Network Environment That Seamlessly Supports Any & All Range Operations 24/7/365 In the Most Spectrum-Efficient Manner Possible
24 24 Autonomy Challenges & Solutions Challenges Solutions Range control and safety Establishing user trust Non-intrusive instrumentation Testing see-and-avoid technologies Repeatable testing of cognitive autonomous system interactions DMS/ISTF/OAR correlation Replicating swarming autonomy scenarios CTEIP Projects o Swarm Autonomy and Scoring (SWARM) Supporting T&E/S&T Efforts o o o o Autonomy T&E Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Investment Plan (IGAP) Stress Testing of Autonomy Architectures (STAA) Robustness Inside-Out Testing (RIOT) Safe Testing of Autonomy in Complex, Interactive Environments (TACE)
25 25 Cyber Security Challenges & Solutions Challenges Solutions Keeping pace with rapidly changing cyber threats Ability to present representative operational environments Visualization of cyber battlefield and effects Controlling propagation of threat (isolated from operational systems) Sanitization of the test environment Maximize utility of distributed cyber test environments National Cyber Range (NCR) o o o o Multiple Independent Levels of Security (MILS) architecture; rapid emulation; automation; sanitization capabilities Cyber Table Tops Regional Service Delivery Points (RSDPs) NCR Complex Buildout CTEIP Projects o CTEIP Cyber Test Analysis and Simulation Environment (CyberTASE) Supporting T&E/S&T Efforts o o Advanced Cyber Threat Representation (ACTR) Framework for Automated and Verified Sanitization (FAVS)
26 Ultimate Vision 26
27 VISION: Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) Test Environment CROSS DOMAIN OPERATIONS Programs of Record (e.g., F-35) Tactical Network Emulation Virtual & Constructive Red & Blue System Simulations Mission Based Scenarios System Integration Test Support Network Distributed Data Collection Cloud Services Common Tools Standard Processes and Repositories TENA Solutions TENA Middleware Virtualization V V & A PRE-EVENT Planning Protocol Translators JMETC Networks System Adaptors JTEN Massively Parallel Processing Configuration Management Gateways Security Range Protocols JIOR EVENT Monitoring, Management, Control Big Data Storage High Level Architecture Cross Domain Solutions Information Assurance Distributed Interactive Simulation Big Data Analytics POST-EVENT Data Reduction, Analysis, Visualization MOP Framework
28 VISION: LVC Test Environment A Closer Look
29 TRMC Points of Contact 29
30 TRMC Points of Contact Mr. Derrick Hinton Acting Director, TRMC Acting Executive Agent (EA) for Cyber Test Ranges Mr. Chip Ferguson Deputy EA, Cyber Test Ranges Mr. AJ Pathmanathan Director, National Cyber Range (NCR) Complex Dr. Robert Tamburello Deputy Director, NCR Complex PM, NCR Complex Expansion Mr. G. Derrick Hinton (Acting) Director, TRMC EA, Cyber Test Ranges Ms. Sheila Wright (Acting) Principal Deputy, TRMC Mr. George Rumford Deputy Director, Major Initiatives & Technical Analyses PM, Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) PM, Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) george.j.rumford.civ@mail.mil Ms. Denise De La Cruz Deputy Director, T&E Range Oversight denise.b.delacruz.civ@mail.mil Mr. Christopher Paust PM, Central Test & Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) christopher.w.paust.civ@mail.mil As of 1 Oct
31 Backup 31
32 Concept for Alternative Paths Report to Congress...Response to Section 901 August 2017 Alternative Pathway is not uncommon to smaller acquisitions While DoDI and DoDD processes remain in place USD(R&E) will set policy for implementing the alternative pathways to speed the delivery of capability to the warfighter Additional DoD Initiatives: Project MAVIN -- Agile -- Autonomy Report to Congress,.. Response to Section 901 Alternate Pathways Initiated by operators defining a need or researchers identifying an opportunity Resources applied to procure limited numbers for: Testing, prototyping, user evaluations, operational assessments Deliberate decision point: Further invest to scale up, Divest, Continue modifying, or Harvest technology and move on Figure 6: Alternate Pathways each echelon of the Department must be structured to rapidly adapt and field capabilities that leverage the advances that are occurring at an ever increasing pace in the commercial and defense technology sectors (Report to Congress,.. Response to Section 901 August 2017) 32
33 Test Domain Contribution Test Domains Ground Test Resources Flight Test Resources Modeling & Simulation Low cost, high volume, high statistical significance Validation of engagement models Digital representation of threat offensive capabilities Replication of operational context HW in the Loop & Installed Sys Test Facility Intermediate step in systems engineering development Complexity of replicating phenomenology; RF and IR environment Representative HW and SW Replication of operational context RA programs may exploit test domains to a greater or lesser extent balancing risk to meet schedule Open Air Open Air Captive Carry Live Launch Moderate cost, moderate High cost, low volume of volume, moderate statistical test data, low statistical significance significance Focused on evaluating Complexity and cost of missile seeker commands, replicating complex prior to live fire test scenario and Complexity and cost of environments replicating complex Supports M&S validation scenario and environments Limited by flight safety, Supports M&S validation target operating limits Limited by flight safety, captive carry operating limits 33
34 30 th Space Wing Vandenberg AFB, CA NAWC-WD Point Mugu, CA Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB): The Critical Core 23 Sites: Army-8; Navy-6; Air Force-7; Defense Agency-2 Updated 22 Jul 2015 Legend: Created by Congress Army, Navy, AF, Defense Agency 25,000+ Personnel ~$4B in Funding Annually Cold Regions Test Center Fort Greely, AK NAWC-WD China Lake, CA U.S. Army Kwajalein Atoll Reagan Test Site PMRF Kauai, HI NUWC Keyport (Nanoose & Dabob ranges) Keyport, WA 412th Test Wing Edwards AFB, CA Nevada Test and Training Range Nellis AFB, NV DISA,JITC Fort Huachuca, AZ Tropic Regions Test Center, various locations Utah Test and Training Range Hill AFB, UT West Desert Test Center Dugway Proving Ground, UT Yuma Test Center Yuma Proving Ground, AZ Electronic Proving Ground Fort Huachuca, AZ 96 th Test Wing (Includes 96 th Test Group), Eglin AFB, FL White Sands Test Center, White Sands Missile Range, MN DISA Ft. Meade, MD Army 5.5M Acres Land Navy 1M Acres Land, 165K sq mi Sea, 103K sq mi Air Air Force Western Ranges ALONE 5M Acres Land Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD NAWC-AD Patuxent River NAS, MD Arnold Engineering Development Complex, Arnold AFB, TN 45 th Space Wing, Patrick AFB, FL Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center, Andros Island, Bahamas 34
35 Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) Program Mission: Develop Technologies Required to Test Future Warfighting Capabilities Established in FY02 Joint DDR&E / DOT&E Initiative Transitioned to TRMC in FY05 RDT&E Budget Activity 3 funds Purpose High Risk / High Payoff R&D for Testing Foster technology transition to major DoD test ranges Risk reduction for test capabilities developments Annual Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) Academia Industry Government Laboratories Tri-Service working groups Validate requirements Evaluate proposals Facilitate technology transition 58 Active Projects Central Oversight Distributed Execution High Speed Systems 15 Active Projects Eight Test Technology Areas Unmanned & Autonomous Systems 4 Active Projects Spectrum Efficiencies 8 Active Projects Advanced Instrumentation 9 Active Projects Directed Energy 4 Active Projects Cyberspace 3 Active Projects Electronic Warfare 10 Active Projects C4I & Software Intensive Systems 5 Active Projects Shaping Technology into Tomorrow s T&E Capabilities 35
36 Central Test & Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Mission: Develop or Improve Major Test Capabilities that have multi-service Utility Established in FY91 by Congress with 6.4 RDT&E funds Long-Term multi-service Investments Near-Term Investments JIM-Core 3-5 year requirement horizon EMD of major multi-service test capabilities Development, not procurement Services & Agencies budget for O&M $ M/year, $600- $700M over 5 years Joint Improvement & Modernization (JIM) JIM-EW Special DoD area of emphasis EMD of electronic warfare (EW) test capabilities Assess aircraft performance against complex new threats. Service budget for O&M Total cost ~$465 over ~7 years JIM-Hypersonics Special DoD area of emphasis EMD of hypersonic ground test capabilities Focus on hypersonic cruise & boost glide missiles Service budget for O&M Total cost ~$350 over ~5 years Resource Enhancement Project (REP) 1-2 year horizon EMD of instrumentation to address near term OT shortfalls Coordinated with DOT&E $18-20M/year Threat Systems Project (TSP) 1-2 year horizon Address shortfalls in threat systems representation Coordinated with DOT&E $3-5M/year Biennial multi-service T&E Reliance Nomination Process Multiple DoD EW studies DoD Approved Roadmap Annual review of OT shortfalls Annual review of threat needs Requirements Drivers 31 JIM, 6 EW, 17 Hypersonics, 19 REP, 13 TSP = 86 Projects 36
37 JMETC SECRET Network (JSN) Functional JSN Locations: 46 (access to 77 labs/facilities) Planned JSN Locations: 4 Connection Points to Other Networks: 5 Edwards (2): Ridley 412 th EWG IFAST China Lake (4): F/A-18, IBAR, TSPIL, AV-8B Land Range, WSCI Point Mugu (4): ITEC, EW CyCon, AEA, Sea Range MAGTF EW Camp Pendleton: MCTSSA Corona: NSWC Port Hueneme: NSWC Point Loma : (2) SSC-PAC SSC-PAC CTB LMMT FTEC (Keyport Det.) W. Interconnect Rtr. Rancho Bernardo NGC Triton MHPCC Hawaii Pearl Harbor FIST2FAC (Keyport Det.) Army Air Force Navy Marines Joint Keyport NUWC Industry Dugway Proving Ground Raytheon Tucson Ft Huachuca (4): JITC, JTDL, CMIS, JTRS Leverages the SECRET Defense Research and Engineering Network (SDREN) for connectivity Operates at SECRET classification, available 24/7 Continuous monitoring, troubleshooting, and optimization of the end-to-end network infrastructure Capable of supporting numerous simultaneous test events WSMR IRCC Tinker AFB AWACS Ft. Sill, SMART Lab Greenville Rivet Joint Ft Hood (2): CTSF, TTEC As of 21 Aug 2017 WPAFB: SIMAF Crane (2): NSWC RDT&E, NTN Lab Redstone (12): SMDC RTC: DTCC, DISTL, AvSTIL AMRDEC SSDD AMRDEC SED: Patriot, THAAD, FAAD, GSIL, JLENS, MUSE, C-RAM Eglin AFB (4): AOC, DTF, GWEF, KHILS GTRI LMCO Global Vision Network Pittsfield GD LCS Hanscom AFB CEIF Rome NY AFRL Newport NUWC Melbourne NGC JSTARS Moorestown (2): CSEDS, CPTS Aberdeen: ATC-STE, ARL Arlington IDT Dahlgren: (3) IWSL, DOC, ICSTF Rapid-SIL/C2 Pax River: (11) E2C, E2D, MCL, ATR ACETEF, SAIL, MFS, P-8, E-2C SIL, UASIL, EP-3 Triton Lab JMETC SYSCON East Interconnect Rtr. JS J6 DDC4 C4AD Langley TDLITC Dam Neck CDSA Wallops Island SCSC Newport News NGC VASCIC Manassas LM ASW McLean MITRE NSEL Metro Park JMETC / TENA SDA Lab DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 37
38 National Cyber Range (NCR) Complex Computing Assets/Facility Encapsulation Architecture & Operational Procedures Integrated SW Testing Toolsuite Provides the ability to rapidly design, deploy and sanitize large scale, high fidelity test and training environments Extremely malicious threats can be unleashed on operationally, representative systems and networks to assess the impact on the network, networked weapon systems, the associated mission Significant technological advancements incorporated into integrated tool suite Highlighted by the significant level of automation Ability to support up to four concurrent events, executed in completely isolated testbeds, at different levels of classification Automated sanitization capability Expunges all malicious code from every component used within the event and returns it to a pristine state ready for reuse Sanitizes not only storage but also servers (including non-volatile RAM) and network equipment Time saving In many cases, what previously took weeks or months has been reduced to hours or days Allowing users the ability to rapidly plan, execute, and analyze their test or training initiatives NCR also provides SME Available, at the discretion of the user, to support the planning, execution and analysis of test and training events NCR is able to collaborate with other cyber ranges using secure networks When test events require special capabilities or additional scale 38
Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Perspective
Cleared for Public Release 24 February 2017 Case # 17-S-0939 Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Perspective 32 nd Annual National Defense Industry Association Test and Evaluation Conference Mr. Darrin
More informationBriefing for: NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Improving T&E with Distributive Test Capabilities Briefing for: NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Marty Arnwine Deputy Director, for Operations and Planning
More informationThe National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Conference 2009
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability () Test Resource Management Center Briefing for: The National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Conference 2009 Lowering Technical Risk by Improving
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3200.11 December 27, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) References: (a) DoD Directive 3200.11, Major Range and Test Facility Base,
More informationThe DoD T&E/S&T Program
The DoD T&E/S&T Program George Rumford Program Manager Test Resource Management Center Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology Program (TRMC, T&E/S&T) NDIA 11 TH Annual Science & Engineering Technology
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 50 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2012 Ms.
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 49 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2011 Mr.
More informationJoint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Improving Distributed Test Capabilities NDIA Annual T&E Conference
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Improving Distributed Test Capabilities NDIA Annual T&E Conference Chip Ferguson Program Manager March 16, 2011 Agenda TRMC Distributed Testing What is
More information17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward
17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward Mr. Paul D. Mann (Acting) Principal Deputy Director Test Resource Management Center January 26, 2017 1 2 TRMC
More information46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview
46 Test Squadron Distributed Test Overview Prepared for ITEA Test & Evaluation (T&E) of System of Systems (SoS) Conference 24-27 January 2012 Mr Jesse Flores Test Engineer / JICO 46TS/OGEJ (Jacobs/TYBRIN)
More informationGerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010
Building Next Generation Range Capabilities Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Gerry Christeson Test Resource Management Center 20 October 2010 1 Test Resource Management Center (TRMC)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
More informationProduct Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell
Product Support Manager Workshop Rapid Capabilities Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell June 8, 2017 17-S-1832 Deliberate Requirements vs. Urgent / Rapid Requirements Lanes Urgent
More informationThe Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)
U.S. ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND The Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) MG John W. Charlton 8 November 2017 Mission What does ATEC do for the Army? ATEC plans, integrates,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support
More information2016 DOD T&E Spectrum Activity
2016 DOD T&E Spectrum Activity Western Regional Partnership (WRP) Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) 4800 Mark Center Drive Alexandria, VA 22350 July 12, 2016 Chris Mazur, DoD T&E Ranges Sustainability
More informationMiddle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways
Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways Pete Modigliani Su Chang Dan Ward Contact us at accelerate@mitre.org Approved for public release. Distribution unlimited 17-3828-2. 2 Purpose
More informationCommon Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 48 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2010 Mr.
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3200.11 May 1, 2002 Certified Current as of December 1, 2003 SUBJECT: Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) DOT&E References: (a) DoD Directive 3200.11, "Major
More informationTest and Evaluation/ Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) Program
Test and Evaluation/ Science and Technology (T&E/S&T) Program 8th Annual Science & Engineering Technology Conference/DoD Technology Exposition April 17-19, 19, 2007 Mr. Derrick Hinton T&E/S&T Program Manager
More informationOversight of DoD Test and Evaluation (T&E) Resources
Oversight of DoD Test and Evaluation (T&E) Resources Topics Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) Test Range Issues/Concerns Summary 2 Test Resource Management
More informationThe DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources
The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources Mr. Jason Coker Mr. Christopher Paust March 4, 2009 Test Resource Management Center 1225 South Clark Street, Arlington VA 22202 Outline TRMC Background
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)
PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationCommand Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division
Command Overview Naval Surface Warfare Center, Division CAPT Mark Vandroff Commanding Officer, NSWCCD February 2018 Dr. Paul Shang Technical Director (Acting), NSWCCD Distribution Statement A: Approved
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
More informationAir-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air-Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Phase II Success and Challenges of Distributed Testing Mr. Timothy Menke Technical Director
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base FY 213 OCO FY 213 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5141.02 February 2, 2009 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Reissues DoD
More informationDOT&E Initiatives from the Middle
Dugway Proving Ground DOT&E Initiatives from the Middle NDIA Test & Evaluation Conference Darren Jolley March 12-15, 2012 The Bun Holds Us Together, But Where s The Beef? DOT&E, DUSA-TE and JRO-CBRND OTA
More informationJoint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Overview Briefing
Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Overview Briefing The TRMC Blueprint : Putting Test Capabilities on the DoD Map Defense Strategic Guidance Acquisition Process Service T&E Needs and Solutions
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationAn Enterprise Environment for Information Assurance / Computer Network Defense Testing and Evaluation
An Enterprise Environment for Information Assurance / Computer Network Defense Testing and Evaluation Parker Horner, EWA Gov t Systems Inc. Steve Moore, Booz Allen Hamilton Today s Agenda Introduction
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
More informationMaking the Case for Distributed Testing
ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 347 354 Making the Case for Distributed Testing Bernard Chip Ferguson Test Resource Management Center, Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program, Arlington, Virginia
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total
More informationARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)
ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average Unit Cost (TY$): Low-Rate
More informationFIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)
FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL) Joint ACAT ID Program (Navy Lead) Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 685 Boeing Platform Integration Total Program Cost (TY$): $180M Data Link Solutions FDL Terminal Average
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
More informationCommand Overview. Dr. Joseph T. (Tim) Arcano, Jr. Technical Director, NSWCCD. CAPT Rich Blank Commanding Officer, NSWCCD
CAPT Rich Blank Commanding Officer, NSWCCD Command Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release Dr. Joseph T. (Tim) Arcano, Jr. Technical Director, NSWCCD Division We envision the future
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 FY 212 Base PE 65864N: Test & Evaluation Support FY 212 OCO FY 212 Total FY 213 FY 214 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationWARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY
5th Annual Testing and Training Symposium & Exhibition: Partnering In National Defense at Home and Abroad WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY Presented by Ted Wheeler & Mark Rindler Special
More information2017 Munitions Executive Summit
2017 Munitions Executive Summit Mr. Jose Gonzalez Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Tactical Warfare Systems March 23, 2017 Office of the Secretary of Defense SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Honorable Jim Mattis
More informationConducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
More informationRapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract October 2009
Small Arms Air Platform Integration Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract 8851 28-October 2009 Joseph Burkart Crane Division, Naval Surface
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationStrike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory MIT and ONR Objectives Office of Naval Research (ONR), PMR-51 Coordinates, executes, and promotes the S&T programs of the Navy and Marine Corps.
More informationIndustry Day RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division. 23 May 2012
Industry Day 2012 Presented by: 23 May 2012 RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; 1 distribution is unlimited. Strategic
More informationSSC Pacific is making its mark as
5.3 FEATURE FROM THE SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER PACIFIC INTERNAL NEWSLETTER SSC Pacific C4I scoring direct hit for shore-based ballistic missile defense SSC Pacific is making its mark as a valued partner in
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 92.713 23.188 31.064 46.007-46.007
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 27448F PE TITLE: C2ISR Tactical Data Link Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 27448F C2ISR Tactical Data Link 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Total Actual Complete Total Program Element (PE) Cost
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE J / Joint Integrated Air & Missile Defense Organization (JIAMDO) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 The Joint Staff Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationRapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract May 2011
Small Arms Air Platform Integration Rapid Development and Integration of Remote Weapon Systems to Meet Operational Requirements Abstract 12109 25-May 2011 Joseph Burkart Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification May 2009 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY 6 (RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT) OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES (OT&A) PROGRAM ELEMENT
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-6 0604759N Major T & E Investment Prior Total COST ($
More informationFirst Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
More informationSynthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) The Army s future training capability is the Synthetic Training Environment (STE). The Synthetic Training Environment
More informationSpectrum of Testing. OPERATIONAL testing for the warfighter in the representative BATTLESPACE ENVIRONMENT
Vision Statement To be the best operational test agency, recognized for impartial, accurate, and timely contributions that continuously improve America s warfighting capability. 2 Mission Statement We
More informationJoint Staff J7 Cyberspace Environment Division / Joint Information Operations Range (JIOR) Overview
Joint Staff J7 Cyberspace Environment Division / Joint Information Operations Range (JIOR) Overview Approved for Public Release by Joint Staff Public Affairs - Hampton Roads 18 Dec 15 JIOR Background DoD
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 22.113 15.501 10.448-10.448 19.601 18.851
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 64256A: THREAT SIMULATOR
More informationEXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 0603237N Deployable Joint Command & Control (DJC2) COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationMaking Warfighter Materiel Solutions Better
DoD R&D Laboratories Making Warfighter Materiel Solutions Better Joseph D. Wienand, Technical Director U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center (ECBC) 17 April 2011 Approved for Public Release AGENDA
More informationJoint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP)
Joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP) JDEP Strategy Final Report Dr. Judith S. Dahmann John Tindall The MITRE Corporation March 2001 March 2001 Table of Contents page Executive Summary 1 Introduction
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 119: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA : Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions) FY R1 Program Element
More informationSystem Simulation and Development Directorate (SSDD) Overview
Presented to: Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association (HAMA) 14 Dec 2012 System Simulation and Development Directorate (SSDD) Overview DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605602A Army Technical Test Instrumentation and Targets ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
More informationATEC Testing In Support of the War
ATEC Testing In Support of the War James B. Johnson U.S. Army Developmental Test Command 6 Feb 07 1 Understand Who We Are Full Spectrum Testing All phases of testing; developmental, operational & evaluation
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 242.669 68.656 70.614 82.195-82.195
More informationMANAGING LARGE DISTRIBUTED DATA SETS FOR TESTING IN A JOINT ENVIRONMENT
MANAGING LARGE DISTRIBUTED DATA SETS FOR TESTING IN A JOINT ENVIRONMENT Thomas Bock thomas.bock@jte.osd.mil Tonya Easley tonya.easley@jte.osd.mil John Hoot Gibson john.gibson@jte.osd.mil Joint Test and
More informationDevelopmental Test and Evaluation Is Back
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2010; 31: 309 312 Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back Edward R. Greer Director, Developmental Test and Evaluation, Washington, D.C. W ith the Weapon Systems Acquisition
More informationMiddle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways
Middle Tier Acquisition and Other Rapid Acquisition Pathways Pete Modigliani Su Chang Dan Ward 26 Jun 18 Contact us at accelerate@mitre.org Approved for public release. Distribution unlimited 17-3828-3.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #142
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
More informationTest and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 2 Page 1 of 9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Project Justification February 2006 OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION, DEFENSE (0460) BUDGET ACTIVITY SIX CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM ELEMENT (PE) 0604940D8Z Cost ($
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #189
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Defense Information Systems Agency : March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207701F PE TITLE: Full Combat Mission Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 752.328 704.475 722.071-722.071 701.000 702.979 716.873 725.979
More informationCol Alan Pratt, USMC Commander. Distribution Statement A Approved for Public Release. Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director
1 Col Alan Pratt, USMC Commander Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director 2 TEAM Crane 3 rd Largest Naval Installation in the World (100 Square Miles) TEAM Crane $2.24 B FY 11 Business Base 4,372+ Govt.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Human, Social and Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling Advanced Development FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2010 0400: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide BA 4: Advanced Component & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationPROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)
EXHIBIT R-2, FY 2001 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0305206N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD) (U) COST: (Dollars in
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 205 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name)
More informationA udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001
A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2019 OCO. FY 2019 Base
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2019 Navy : February 2018 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2020
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004
PE NUMBER: 27438F PE TITLE: Theater Battle Management Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 24 7 Operational System Development 27438F Theater Battle Management Cost ($ in Millions) 23
More informationPrepared for Milestone A Decision
Test and Evaluation Master Plan For the Self-Propelled Artillery Weapon (SPAW) Prepared for Milestone A Decision Approval Authority: ATEC, TACOM, DASD(DT&E), DOT&E Milestone Decision Authority: US Army
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element - 13.610 13.355 12.874-12.874
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2005 APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, Defense-Wide/05
/PE 0303158K A. Mission Description & Budget Item Justification: (JC2) is the next generation of command and control for the Department of Defense (DoD). JC2 is the follow-on to the Global Command and
More information