FUDS Camp San Luis Obispo Treatability Study San Luis Obispo, California

Transcription

1 SECTION C PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT TREATABILITY STUDY FORMER CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO J09CA SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 7 8 January PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: The performance objective of this task order is to design and execute a Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) remedial action as a Treatability Study that recovers all MEC and Targets of Interest (TOI) that can be detected using advanced EMI technologies and requires the least number of non-hazardous items to be excavated in the process. The detection threshold will be no greater than the equivalent necessary to detect a horizontal 37mm at 30cm subsurface, as demonstrated in Tasks 6 and 7. Government Furnished Property (GFP) will be available as described in Section The performance objective also includes achieving acceptance of the Final Treatability Study Report in compliance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, and Department of Defense, Army, and USACE Regulations and Guidance to include Interim Guidance and Data Item Descriptions (DID) at the referenced Munitions Response Site. It is anticipated that the Final Feasibility Study and Decision Document will recommend a remedial action to include subsurface work within a portion of MRS 05, to include the area covered under this Task Order. The intent of the Treatability Study is to supplement the Feasibility Study with an evaluation on the effectiveness of Advanced EMI sensors during the remedial action phase. 2.0 BACKGROUND: 2.1 Work under this Performance Work Statement (PWS) falls within the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) for the Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Camp San Luis Obispo. The Contractor shall perform all work in compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR Part 300. All activities involving work in areas potentially containing explosive hazards shall be conducted in full compliance with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Department of the Army (DA), and Department of Defense (DoD) regulations. All Unexploded Ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions (DMM) and Munitions Constituents (MC) encountered during this munitions response shall be processed in accordance with the approved work and safety plans. 2.2 Available site specific information will be provided with the request for proposal for contractor reviews and to use either a designated Internet site or delivery of recorded data on CD/DVD. This information may include but is not limited to the general site history, previous investigations and other documentation. 2.3 Location: The Camp San Luis Obispo site is approximately 9,159 acres situated along Highway 1, approximately five miles northwest of. This task covers only the 7 acres within MRS05 Range Complex (2523 acres) depicted in Attachment A, Figure 1. The exact survey boundaries will be finalized during the TPP process. 1

2 2.4 History: The Camp San Luis Obispo was established in 1928 by California as a National Guard Camp. Identified at that time as Camp Merriam, it originally consisted of 5,800 acres. Additional lands were added in the early 1940s until the total acreage consisted of 14,959. During World War II, Camp San Luis Obispo was used by the U.S. Army from 1943 to 1946 for infantry division training. Uses of the camp included artillery, small arms, mortar, rocket, and grenade ranges. According to the Preliminary Historical Records Report (HRR), there were a total of 27 ranges and 13 training areas located on Camp San Luis Obispo during World War II. Following the end of World War II, a small portion of the former camp land was returned to its former private owners. The U.S. Army was making arrangements to relinquish the rest of Camp San Luis Obispo to the State of California and other government agencies when the conflict in Korea started in The camp was reactivated at that time. The U.S. Army again used the former camp during the Korean War from 1951 through 1953 where the Southwest Signal Center was established for the purpose of signal corps training. The HRR identified 18 ranges and 16 training areas present at Camp San Luis Obispo during the Korean War. A limited number of these ranges and training areas were used previously during World War II. Following the Korean War, the camp was maintained in inactive status until it was relinquished to the General Services Administration (GSA) in GSA then transferred the property to other agencies and individuals beginning in the late-1960s through the 1980s, most of which was transferred for education purposes (Cal Poly and Cuesta College). A large portion of Camp San Luis Obispo (the original 5,880 acres) has been retained by the California National Guard (CNG) and is not part of the FUDS program. MRS 05 Range Complex The Range Complex consists of 2,523 acres situated north of Highway 1 and spanning from the western boundary to the eastern boundary with all ranges facing north to northeast. In the fall of 2011, the field work for a Remedial Investigation was completed. Table 2 presents the current CSM of UXO known to exist in MRS 5 and their confirmed maximum depths of recovery. 2

3 Table 2 Current Conceptual Site Model For Munitions In MRS 5 And Their Maximum Depth Of Recovery Munition Type Maximum Depth Recovered (cm) 37mm projectiles 5 MKII hand grenades 10 M1 practice mines 8 M9A1 rifle grenades n/a* MK145 barrage rocket 0 fuze with booster 2.36 rockets with or 8 without motors still attached MK5 and MK23 10 Practice Bombs 60mm mortars 5 81mm mortars 25 3 Stokes mortars 55 75mm projectiles n/a* 105mm projectiles mm projectiles barrage rockets 38 5 rockets n/a* *Fragments of these items were recovered confirming they were used in the MRS. No intact items were recovered in any previous investigation. 2.5 Previous Investigations: See separately provided Archive Search Report (ASR), Site Inspection (SI) Report, 2009 ESTCP UXO Classification Study, and Draft Final Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Report. In September 2013, ESTCP and USACE collected dynamic TEMTADS transects through the area. The resulting target picks are depicted in Attachment A- Figure 1 and the kriged estimated densities (anomalies/acre) are depicted in Figure 2. There is no report from this field effort but electronic data are available with the other site specific information. 3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Contractor Methods: This is a performance based task order. The performance objectives and standards included herein are the basis of the task order requirements. The technical approach and level of effort expended to achieve task order objectives and standards are solely up to the contractor to select and adjust as necessary through the life of the task order. Government recognizes the contractor s right to change the technical approach and level of effort from that proposed with the understanding that the contractor shall still meet all project objectives and gain government Quality 3

4 Assurance acceptance in order to receive payment. If after the TPP but before the field work begins an adjustment in the quantities or types of field investigations are required to achieve the performance standard or the Government determines that the performance standard must be adjusted the Government at its discretion may choose to modify the contract with the price adjustment based upon the prorated unit prices proposed in the accepted offer. Once these adjustments are complete the contractor shall be obligated to deliver the required performance standard making adjustments in the field strategy as may be necessary to achieve the standard without a change in price Quality monitoring and measurement: The contractor will be evaluated periodically during performance of this task order to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations, guidance and DIDs, and to document that acceptance criteria (AC), delivery schedule, and the overall completion date are being met. This evaluation will be performed according to a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). A draft programmatic QASP is provided by the government as a starting point in Attachment B. The government will finalize the Draft QASP during the TPP process to reflect the Contractor s proposed process and quality control procedures. This final QASP will be supplied to the contractor and used by the government to evaluate the contractor s performance. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in a repeat of the work, or a poor performance evaluation, or both Performance Requirements. Performance requirements are addressed in each task and summarized in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) provided in Attachment C. Performance metrics are provided in Attachment D. If discrepancies or ambiguity exists between the documents, the order of precedence is 1) the Task; 2) Performance Requirements Summary; 3) Performance Metrics Task pricing: A pricing schedule is provided in Attachment E, which will be used as a basis for negotiation of price increase or decrease due to government changes in the specified performance objectives Key Personnel: The contractor and subcontractor personnel shall be experienced and competent in the tasks for which they are responsible and currently possess any required certifications, registrations, or licenses required under federal, state, and/or local laws and regulations. The minimum required personnel qualifications are as follows, but not limited to: Project Manager (PM) shall be responsible for implementing specific work under this contract. He/she shall evaluate the requirements of the contract and shall develop and implement a plan to meet those requirements. The Project Manager shall be the primary point-of-contact for the contract. The Project Manager should have, as a minimum the following qualifications: (1) Bachelor s degree from an accredited school in a technically related field such as geophysics, environmental engineering, environmental science, geology, hydrology, environmental chemistry, or other. (2) Professional registration, where applicable. (3) A minimum of ten (10) years experience as Project Manager, with minimum of (a): project management of one (1) advanced classification project to include management at the field operational level; or 4

5 (b): five (5) years experience managing environmental or munitions projects at the field operational level. (4) Working knowledge of applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidance Senior UXO supervisor (SUXO). All UXO personnel shall meet the requirements and qualifications in DDESB TP Project Geophysicist. The project geophysicist shall be responsible for geophysical survey design, dynamic data collection, cued data collection, developing a verification plan, and all aspects of quality control. The Project Geophysicist shall have, at a minimum, the following qualifications: (1) A degree in geophysics, engineering geophysics, or closely related field or equivalent demonstrated proficiency with advanced geophysical methods and concepts related to munitions response and possess 5 years of directly related UXO geophysical experience. (2) Must be experienced with the theoretical and practical aspects of detecting and selecting a wide range of targets of interest (TOI) and non-targets of interest (non-toi). (3) Experienced in the selection and utilization of various types of geophysical instruments and ancillary components to include high-precision global positioning systems, inertial motion sensors and the software used to control and integrate the geophysical system as a whole. (4) Shall have, at a minimum, documented experience performing advanced classification using only advanced EMI instrument survey data, to include documented experience processing and analyzing advanced EMI instrument data, and developing and performing or overseeing quality control procedures for advanced EMI data acquisition, analysis and classification processes Field Geophysicist. The field geophysicist(s) shall be responsible for proper operation of advanced geophysical EMI systems and performing quality control during advanced EMI system surveys. Field Geophysicist(s) shall have, at a minimum, the following qualifications: (1) One year of directly related UXO geophysical experience (2) Documented or independently verifiable experience operating an advanced geophysical EMI system to include the geophysical instruments, high-precision global positioning systems, inertial motion sensors and the software used to control and integrate the geophysical system as a whole Other Requirements: The safety manager and quality manager must be separate individuals. A UXO Safety and UXO QC are required for at least the portions dealing with direct contact with the munitions and depending on the number of personnel those two positions can be dual-hatted. The contractor should have two QCs individuals, one trained on the technology and one for UXO QC. Also, the UXO QC can be part-time position Government Furnished Property. Under this Task Order, government furnished property is available for use by the contractor. GFP provided to contractors shall be in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and , Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) , , , and , and Army FAR Supplement (AFARS) Part 5145, and all provisions and requirements stated in this task order. 5

6 The Government can furnish or make available up to two advanced geophysical sensors. It is the contractor s discretion to identify the GFE required to complete the tasks in this PWS. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide any additional materials or equipment necessary to accomplish the objective of this PWS that are not listed in GFE list. For Government scheduling purposes the Contractor shall identify the GFP a minimum of 30 days in advance of needing it in the field. The following GFP can be furnished or made available: a. Metal Mapper Unit #1 Name Part Numb er Quantity Unit of Measure Acquisition Cost Unique Identifier for tracking Year of manu factu re MM DAQ each 45,000 MM Interface peripherals MM Deployment structure MM assembly components each 6,000 Display, mouse, keyboard each 6,000 Sled, arms, tractor mount, nut, bolts, washers, stand-off each 500 Wood compone nts, fiberglass compone nts, nuts, bolts, washers Batteries each 2,400 LiO battery Battery each 1600 LiO charger battery charger IMU each 2,500 MicroStra in IMU with heading and tilt MM GPS mount each 1,000 GPS mount and 6

7 MM X Tx coil MM Y Tx coil MM Z Tx coil and Rx coils Shipping crate MM wiring harness USB to RS232 adapter hardware each 2,500 Tx-X coil and wire harness each 2,500 Tx-Y coil and wire harness each 20,000 Tx-Z coil and wire harness and 7 Rx cubes each 1,500 Shipping crate compone nts each 700 Power and data wiring harness each 75 Singleport USB adapter b. Metal Mapper Unit #2 Name Part Numb er Quantity Unit of Measure Acquisition Cost Unique Identifier for tracking Year of manu factu re MM DAQ each 45,000 MM Interface peripherals MM Deployment structure MM assembly components each 6,000 Display, mouse, keyboard each 6,000 Sled, arms, tractor mount, nut, bolts, washers, stand-off each 500 Wood compone nts, fiberglass compone nts, nuts, bolts, 7

8 washers Batteries each 2,400 LiO battery Battery charger each 1600 LiO battery charger IMU each 2,500 MicroStra in IMU with heading and tilt MM GPS mount MM X Tx coil MM Y Tx coil MM Z Tx coil and Rx coils Shipping crate MM wiring harness USB to RS232 adapter each 1,000 GPS mount and hardware each 2,500 Tx-X coil and wire harness each 2,500 Tx-Y coil and wire harness each 20,000 Tx-Z coil and wire harness and 7 Rx cubes each 1,500 Shipping crate compone nts each 700 Power and data wiring harness each 75 Singleport USB adapter c. TEMTADS Unit #1 Name Part Numb er Quantity Unit of Measure Acquisition Cost Unique Identifier for tracking Year of manu factu re Sensor Cart T.1 1 Each $9, TEMTADS/ 3D Sensors T.2 4 Each $16,

9 GPS/IMU T.3 1 Each $2, Tripod IMU T.4 1 Each $2, Cable T.5 1 Each $1, Harness Data T.6 1 Each $26, Acquisition System User Tablet T.7 1 Each $2, System T.8 2 Each $3, Battery Charger System T.9 6 Each $2, Battery System Maintenance Kit T.10 1 Each $ d. TEMTADS Unit #2 Name Part Numb er Quantity Unit of Measure Acquisition Cost Unique Identifier for tracking Year of manu factu re Sensor Cart T.1 1 Each $9, TEMTADS/ T.2 4 Each $16, D Sensors GPS/IMU T.3 1 Each $2, Tripod IMU T.4 1 Each $2, Cable T.5 1 Each $1, Harness Data T.6 1 Each $26, Acquisition System User Tablet T.7 1 Each $2, System T.8 2 Each $3, Battery Charger System T.9 6 Each $2, Battery System Maintenance Kit T.10 1 Each $ GFP Limitations of Use 9

10 The contractor is only authorized to use GFP as specified in the contract and this task order unless otherwise provided for in writing by the contracting officer. Also, the contractor shall not modify GFP unless the modifications are reasonable and necessary to complete the scope of work, or are needed as part of normal maintenance. The MetalMapper and TEMTADS systems provided through this task order do not require modifications, except in certain cases where hardware for mounting the structural components to a deployment vehicle may require drilling or welding. In such cases the contractor must work with the Government PA or his assignee to assess if the modifications made by the contractor can remain as-is at the completion of the work or if the contractor will be required to remove their modifications or restore the modified components back to their original state Property Management Plan Before GFP will be made available to the contractor, the contractor shall have a property management plan, and that plan shall be reviewed by the Government s Property Administrator and accepted by the contracting officer. Within 30 days of contract award or as outlined in the contract, the contractor shall send the project administrator, project manager and contracting officer a draft site specific Property Management Plan for review. The following are components (referred to as Outcomes in the FAR) of the contractor s property management plan on which the Government s review will focus: 1. Outcome 1 - Acquisition 2. Outcome 2 Receipt Process Segment under this outcome is Identification. 3. Outcome 3 - Records 4. Outcome 4 Physical Inventory 5. Outcome 5 - Subcontractor Control 6. Outcome 6 - Reports 7. Outcome 7 Relief of Stewardship Responsibility 8. Outcome 8 Utilization Process Segments include: Consumption, Movement, and Storage. 9. Outcome 9 Maintenance 10. Outcome 10 - Contract Close-out (Disposal of Property) Receipt and Receiving The Contractor shall become accountable and responsible for the GFP at the point of receipt. The receipt and receiving process shall follow the process detailed below: Accountability for GFP will be transferred to the contractor, as follows: 1) Property book officers (PBOs) will release the Government property to a contractor as GFP. The transfer of accountability of property provided to a contractor will be accomplished by issuing a DD Form 1149 or DA Form The document transferring accountability will be approved the contracting officer prior to GFP being provided to the contractor. 2) A joint physical inventory of GFP will be conducted by the PBO, the property administrator, and the contractor prior to the beginning of the contract period. On completion of the inventory and written acknowledgment of receipt by the contractor, the PBO will post the transfer document as a loss to the Army's property accounting records. The PBO will continue to maintain the basic property book records with authorization, identification and management data for all GFP transferred to the contractor. 10

11 3) On termination or completion of the contract, a joint physical inventory by the contractor, the PBO and the property administrator will be accomplished. A transfer document transferring accountability back to the Army will be prepared as directed by the property administrator using DD Form 1149 or DA Form The contracting officer will reconcile the transfer document for shortages and will approve the transfer prior to the PBO acknowledging receipt and accepting accountability for the returned GFP Shipping GFP The Government shall furnish GFP in an as-is condition under the provisions of FAR (d)(2)(iii). This places the responsibility on the contractor for determining the operability of the GFP as well as shipping it to the project site. The contractor is responsible to check the operability of the GFP and to perform whatever repairs, replacements or refurbishments needed, at the contractor s expense, to get the GFP ready for its intended use Cannibalization of GFP Swapping components between GFP systems falls under the definition of cannibalization at FAR (a), and doing so is prohibited at FAR (c)(3) unless otherwise allowed in the contract or approved by the contracting officer. In the event a GFP component failure occurs and the contractor would like to swap components for testing or production purposes, the contractor shall contact the project manager, the USACE geophysicist and the contracting officer to initiate his request for approval to cannibalize GFP Additional Liability for GFP The contractor shall be accountable and responsible for GFP according to FAR and in addition the contractor shall return all GFP components (or the entire GFP system) in the same condition provided. The contractor shall be responsible for all costs required to return all components to the same condition in which they were provided to the contractor. 3.1 Task 1, Technical Project Planning (TPP): This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task. Objective: To finalize the work plan, QAPP, and other required plans prior to the start of field activities and to assist in producing a Final Verification Plan prior to the completion of anomaly excavations in Task 8. Performance Standard: Achieve the objectives of each TPP phase as listed in EM , EM , and applicable Interim Guidance Documents. Facilitate meetings in a professional and organized manner. Acceptance Criteria (AC): Acceptance of TPP documents (meeting presentations, agenda, handouts, Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and memorandums) with up to one (1) revision. Contractor assists USACE PM in planning and leading organized meetings; accomplishing requirements of the TPP process; and conducting the meeting in a professional manner. Zero letters of reprimand, grievances, or formal complaints. Measurement / Monitoring: A TPP checklist for each phase, as provided in the EM , EM , and applicable Interim Guidance Documents, will be used to measure and document progress; guidance cited will be used to evaluate content of documents for acceptance / non-acceptance. The 11

12 Government will attend and evaluate organization and facilitation of the meetings, and professional nature of the meetings. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/poor CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: The contractor shall work within the framework of the TPP process to assist the government in obtaining consensus on specific Data Quality Objectives (DQO), measurement criteria, classification processes, verification processes, and classification performance assessment. The contractor shall propose DQOs necessary to achieve the performance standards in Task 4.0.,The proposed DQOs shall be based on the contractor s proposed and accepted technical approach. The Contractor shall plan for meetings to occur at critical decision points in each of the four TPP phases as follows: First phase, define project objectives; Second phase, determine data needs, the types, amount, and quality of the data required to achieve task order objectives, and identify DQOs; Third phase, develop data collection options, outline QAPP content, and develop draft Verification Plan with stakeholders [combined, Phase II and III efforts ensure every piece of data planned for collection has an associated data use and that the appropriate type and quantity of data are planned for collection]; Fourth phase, finalize data collection program, finalize data quality objectives,, finalize QAPP, and assist the government in finalizing the QASP. Some of those decision points, may occur over short periods of time. After each TPP meeting the contractor shall submit meeting minutes and prepare a TPP memorandum or addendum to a previous TPP memorandum that documents all PDT decisions and agreements. It will be necessary to schedule a stakeholder meeting to present and explain all classification results to the Government and regulators, who will use those results and explanations to finalize the Verification Plan. This meeting shall be scheduled prior to performing Task 8. The contractor shall organize and coordinate all TPP meetings; identify and involve all stakeholders, upon approval by the Government; and be responsible for the logistics of these meetings to include, but not limited to, providing a facilitator, obtaining meeting location, and sending invitation letters (pending government review and acceptance). The Project Manager can be the facilitator of the meetings, as long as the Project Manger has experience in facilitating the TPP process. The Contractor shall prepare, submit for review and gain acceptance of a TPP memorandum or addendum for each meeting. If a site visit is planned prior to acceptance of a Work Plan, the Contractor shall prepare and submit for acceptance an Abbreviated Accident Prevention Plan (AAPP). 3.2 Task 2, Treatability Study Work Plan (WP), Project Management Plan (PMP), and Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plan (UFP-QAPP): This is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task. Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of a WP, PMP, and UFP-QAPP which are detailed and comprehensive plans covering all aspects of dynamic detection, anomaly selection, cued detection, processing, classification, dig list verification, intrusive investigation and methodology, and project execution. UFP-QAPP will adhere to, and modify as necessary, the draft UFP-QAPP template on advanced classification provided in Attachment F. Performance Standard: Prepare the WP in accordance with DID WERS and other applicable DIDs for sub plans, EM , EM , EM a, existing Explosives Site Plan (ESP), and other Interim Guidance as appropriate. Prepare the PMP in accordance with DID WERS Prepare the UFP-QAPP in accordance with Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force UFP- 12

13 QAPP Manual, and interim guidance provided by Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), as appropriate. AC: Acceptance of WP, PMP, and UFP-QAPP with two revisions. Measurement / Monitoring: Review of WP, PMP, and UFP-QAPP to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided and meets applicable guidance. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: Incorporate all decisions pursuant to the TPP process. Assist the government in finalizing the QASP to appropriately reflect the UFP-QAPP and Quality Control Program. 3.3 Task 3, Geospatial Data: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: Utilize a geographic information system (GIS) to maintain and manage all project and geospatial data. Performance Standard: Manage and maintain project data in GIS IAW DID WERS , EM , EM and applicable Interim Guidance Documents. AC: Acceptance of Geospatial Data submissions, which also meet quality and formatting requirements. Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government using cited regulations to determine acceptability. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: The Geospatial Data shall include: - A pre and post-project response action geospatial data analysis. - All available existing data that is applicable to the project will be consolidated into the Geospatial Database and analyzed to relay pertinent information to the Project Delivery Team (PDT). If an existing GIS database is available, it will be provided by the government. - The analysis of data from the GIS shall support all decisions made during the TPP and verification plan process. - The information attained through the pre-treatability Study analysis will be documented in the work plan and UFP-QAPP. - The information attained in the post-treatability Study analysis will be documented in the Treatability Study Final Report. - The pre-treatability Study analysis will encompass social, environmental and/or economic entities that will be or may be impacted by response-action activities. - The post-treatability Study analysis will detail entities impacted by remedial activities and impacts of future response action activities. 13

14 - The pre and post-treatability Study analyses may detail the fieldwork strategies, areas of concern, survey requirements, environmental concerns, milestones and/or other factors that affect product delivery and future action planning. - Entities that may be affected by response actions include but are not limited to: landowners, homeowners, rental tenants, schools, utilities, roads, businesses, recreational areas, air traffic, water bodies and/or industries. - The GIS Database shall be a living repository that is refined throughout the life of the project. - Incorporate layers that overlay on maps of the site that identify physical features, and Material Potentially Presenting Explosive Hazard (MPPEH)/Munitions Debris (MD) found during the field work. Examples include: streets, anomalies, Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) positively identified, identifiable MD, non-toi found during ground truth or verification procedures, sampling location, cultural resources, environmental, biological, and socio-economic variables. - Archeological site locations will not be released to the public without written permission from the USACE and the California State Historic Preservation Officer. - Perform civil surveys IAW EM and DID WERS A licensed Professional Land Surveyor in the State of California shall certify all surveying requirements to include all control points, grid corners, transect points, and boundaries as required by the project. - Final GIS deliverable shall include all documentation, reports, meeting minutes databases, etc. created developed or modified under this task order in original and PDF format. This deliverable shall meet QA acceptance prior to payment of final invoice. - Property owner privacy will be preserved. Property owner names shall not be disseminated in any documents. 3.4 Task 4, Surface Sweep: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: Prior to performing mapping efforts or seed placement, the contractor shall conduct surface clearance of Study area and any other locations/pathways needed for equipment ingress and egress. All metallic objects greater in length than 5 cm in any one direction shall be removed from the surface of the Study area. Deviations from the Study area depicted in Attachment A will be selected by the USACE Project Delivery Team as part of the TPP process. Performance Standard: Metallic materials exposed or partially exposed which are equal to or greater than 5 cm in any one direction shall be removed during the surface sweep. Type, estimated mass, and quantity of materials removed will be logged in accordance with the ESP and UFP-QAPP. Should MEC/MPPEH be recovered, documentation and destruction procedures as defined in the approved UFP-QAPP and ESP shall be followed. Teams performing the surface sweep shall consist of a minimum of one SUXOS and one Technician II or III that meet the DDESB TP 18 requirements for the specific category. The Work Plan shall include the number of teams the Contractor will utilize to accomplish Task 4. All MEC/MPPEH operations shall comply with EP , Explosives Safety and Health Requirements Manual-with change 1 and Errata Sheets and DOD Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH). Only UXO qualified personnel, as identified in DDESB TP 18, shall perform MEC and MEC-related tasks. AC: Review and inspect by the government and finding not more than 5 pieces of metal longer than 5 cm in any one direction within any 100 meter square. 14

15 Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government in accordance with QASP, WP, ESP, and UFP- QAPP. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: -Any necessary vegetation activities will be included as part of this task. -All inaccessible areas will be documented as part of Task 3 of this Task Order Task 4a, Mowing of Grasslands (OPTION): This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: The contractor shall cut the grass on the 7 acre study site to as close to the ground as possible and continue to mow the area twice a month until the start of the Treatability Study field work. A separate Work Plan and Anomaly Avoidance Plan will be needed and approved for this effort. The contractor shall not begin this task until directed by the Contracting Officer. Performance Standard: The grass shall be mowed to as close to the ground that can be safely done. AC: Acceptance by USACE COR, OESS, and Biologist Measurement/Monitoring: Review by government in accordance with QASP, WP, ESP, and UFP- QAPP. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: -This task includes any necessary UXO escort requirements to perform mowing activities. An Anomaly Avoidance Plan will need to be submitted and approved by the USACE OESS Task 4b, Install Silt Fence: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: The contractor shall install a silt fence around the 7 acre study site to keep the local endangered Red-Legged Frog from traveling across or residing on the site. The Work Plan and Anomaly Avoidance plan information will be combined with the work plan and anomaly plan created for Task 4a. The contractor shall not begin this task until directed by the Contracting Officer. Performance Standard: The fence shall be installed in such a way to prevent frogs from entering site. AC: Acceptance by USACE COR, OESS, and Biologist Measurement/Monitoring: Review by government in accordance with QASP, WP, ESP, and UFP- QAPP. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. 15

16 Specific Task Requirements: -This task includes any necessary UXO escort requirements to install fence. An Anomaly Avoidance Plan will need to be submitted and approved by the USACE OESS. 3.5 Task 5, Quality Control Blind Seeding: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: To implement the quality control blind seeding plan defined in the approved Work Plan and UFP-QAPP. All seeds shall be emplaced only after the area has been checked by a qualified UXO Technician to determine if the area is free of subsurface anomalies. Performance Standard: Seed Plan, at a minimum, shall consist of inert 37 millimeter (mm) rounds and small, schedule 80, Industry Standard Objects (ISO) as quality control seeds: Additional information on ISO specifications are defined in Geophysical System Verification: A Physics-Based Alternative to Geophysical Prove outs for Munitions Response, Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), July 2009, All seeds shall be documented in accordance with Task 3 and provided to USACE as a separate database prior to start of Task 6. AC: Acceptance of blind seed plan and blind seed database by USACE. Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government in accordance with QASP, WP, and UFP-QAPP. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: -All seed locations shall be surveyed by a California Licensed Surveyor with locations having centimeter accuracy. -Placement of seeds shall be at variable depths and orientations but no deeper than can be reliably detected using advanced EMI sensors. -Seeds will be placed in sufficient quantity to meet all requirements of the Work Plan and UFP-QAPP and with a density of no fewer than 1 seed per team per day of planned cued collection. -Contractor shall keep all knowledge of quality control seeds blind from the data collection and processing teams. The contractor shall submit for review and acceptance the blind seed firewall plan. 3.6 Task 6, Advanced EMI Sensor Detection Survey: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: To detect all TOI within the study area. Contractor shall perform an Advanced EMI detection survey across 7 acres within MRS 05 Range Complex meeting the project DQOs as defined during the TPP process. Performance Standard: Field work, data quantity and quality, and analysis of said data provides the following results in the Treatability Study report: - Demonstrate that 97% of all areas have been covered with no greater than 0.6 meter line spacing and 100% with no greater than 0.75 meter line spacing; 16

17 - Demonstrate survey design and anomaly selection criteria will detect a 37mm lying horizontally at a depth of 0.3m in the study area; - Demonstrate that all blind seeds and government QA seeds have been detected within 30cm of their actual burial location. - Meet the project DQOs as defined by the TPP process. - All geophysics shall be IAW interim guidance from ESTCP, and DID WERS with the following exceptions and additions: section 2, geophysical prove out shall not be used; raw ASCII data from advanced sensors shall be in a.csv format that can be imported directly into UX-Analyze (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; final, processed, advanced sensor data shall be delivered in Geosoft databases that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; inversion results (if calculated) shall be delivered in Geosoft database(s) that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze Version (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; DGM performance requirements established during the TPP process shall take precedence over performance requirements in Appendix D. AC: Conduct the Treatability Study in accordance with the accepted/approved WP, PMP, UFP- QAPP, and QASP. QC data submitted meets requirement described in the WP and QAPP. All final data and QC tests/documentation submitted and Government QA acceptance of QC tests/documentation gained. Measurement / Monitoring: Periodic inspection/review of field work and data. Verify compliance with accepted WP, PMP, UFP-QAPP and QASP. Quality control tests/documentation submitted per the QASP for government review. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: -Contractor shall provide an appropriate data delivery system as described in Task 11 (DVDs, sharepoint, external hard drives, etc) to deliver to USACE all electronic data in accordance with DID WERS with exceptions and additions stipulated above. -Contractor shall utilize a Geophysical System Verification Process (GSV) to include an Instrument Verification Strip (IVS). -Contractor shall submit all initial IVS data and test pit data prior to start of data collection. An IVS Memorandum discussing the IVS results will be submitted within 5 business days. All data collection will be at risk to contractor without concurrence from USACE. -Contractor shall resolve into separate data lines all measurements from individual receivers of the detection instrument used. -All seeds located to within 0.3m of known location. 3.7 Task 7, Advanced EMI Sensor Cued Survey and Classification: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: To correctly classify 100% of the TOI and correctly classify at least 75% of the non-toi throughout the study area. Contractor shall perform an Advanced EMI cued survey on all anomalies meeting the selection criteria determined in Task 6. All cued surveys will be in accordance with the 17

18 DQOs developed during the TPP process and documented in the approved Work Plan and UFP- QAPP. After all cued interrogations have been completed, all anomalies will be classified into Targets of Interest (TOI) and non-targets of Interest (non-toi) and submitted within 2 weeks after completion of data collection. After government acceptance of the final classification scheme, the Verification Plan developed as part of the TPP process should be readdressed and discussed with Stakeholders and documented in a Verification Memo to be submitted to USACE within 2 weeks after formal acceptance of final TOI and non-toi lists. The Verification Plan is designed to provide assurance that there are no native TOI classified as non-toi. The Verification Memo is a living document and may be modified based on the results of the intrusive investigation. The Contractor shall be responsible to update the Government on any and all changes or updates to the classification scheme as those changes or updated may affect how the Government or regulatory stakeholders implement the Verification Plan. Performance Standard: Field work, data quantity and quality, and analysis of said data provides the following results in the Treatability Study report: - Demonstrate that all anomaly sources meeting the selection criteria have been cued within 0.4 meters of the center of the instrument. - Demonstrate that not less than 90% of all inverted seed locations are within 0.2m (x,y) and 0.15 meters (z) of known location and that 100% are within 0.3m (x,y) and 0.25 meters (z) - Demonstrate 100% of the seeded TOI are classified as TOI - Demonstrate inversion results correctly predict one or more physical parameter(s) of the recovered items (specific tests and test objectives to be established during TPP) - Meet the project DQOs as defined by the TPP process. - Perform all geophysics IAW the WP and QAPP. - Classification process shall be approved by USACE -Verification Memo will document the rationale for verification anomalies to be selected in accordance with the DQOs and classification scheme. AC: Conduct the Treatability Study in accordance with the accepted/approved WP, PMP, UFP- QAPP, and QASP. QC data submitted meets requirement described in the WP and QAPP. All final data and QC tests and documentation submitted with Government QA acceptance of QC tests and documentation gained. Measurement / Monitoring: Periodic inspection/review of field work and data. Verify compliance with accepted WP, PMP, UFP-QAPP and QASP. Quality control tests/documentation submitted per the QASP and Verification Memo submitted for government review and approved. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: - Contractor shall provide an appropriate data delivery system as described in Task 11 (DVDs, sharepoint, external hard drives, etc)to deliver all electronic data in accordance with DID WERS to both USACE and ESTCP. - Contractor shall provide the following data deliverables: raw advanced sensor data in.csv ASCII format that can be imported directly into UX-Analyze (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting; final, background-corrected, cued data shall be delivered in Geosoft databases that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze Version (latest version) without need 18

19 of external or additional formatting; inversion results shall be delivered in Geosoft database(s) that can be opened and viewed using UX-Analyze Version (latest version) without need of external or additional formatting and as portable document files (.pdf) illustrating, at a minimum, the three estimated primary axis polarizabilities, the polarizabilities of the best library match, quality indicators for the measured data, quality indicators for the inversion results, all quantitative classification metrics used in the contractors classification scheme. - Contractor shall utilize a Geophysical System Verification Process (GSV) to include an Instrument Verification Strip (IVS). If there are any changes from Task 6, these will be documented in an IVS Memorandum Addendum. - Contractor shall take appropriate background measurements of at least 1 for every 2 hours of data collection. - Contractor shall provide an updated working diglist within 2 days after completion of the each week s data. - Contractor shall provide a Root Cause Analysis for any misclassified QC or QA seeds within 3 days of notice. - Contractor shall revise classification scheme based upon Government review and ground truth data, to include information gained from the Government QA seeds. - Contractor shall submit the Verification Memo within 2 weeks after acceptance of final TOI and non-toi lists. -Contractor shall designate any training data needs to be intrusively investigated first as part of Task 8. All other anomalies dependent on training digs shall be clearly marked and cross referenced as part of the TOI and non-toi database. 3.8 Task 8, Intrusive Investigation: This is a Firm Fixed Price/Unit Price task. Objective: To recover and document all metallic sources associated with anomalies identified in Task 7 as requiring excavation. All excavations are to be in accordance with the Work Plan, UFP-QAPP, ESP, Verification Plan, and the Revised June 2012 edition of ESTCP s Intrusive Investigation Data Collection Instructions, Munitions Response Live Site Demonstrations. Performance Standards: - Proper processing and disposition of UXO, DMM, and MC encountered in accordance with approved plans. - All Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard and munitions debris shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 14, EM and Errata Sheet No Maintain a detailed accounting of all items recovered per the Revised June 2012 edition of ESTCP s Intrusive Investigation Data Collection Instructions, Munitions Response Live Site Demonstrations.- All MEC encountered during this munitions response shall be processed in accordance with the approved work and safety plans. - Demonstrate all TOI and non-toi identified for excavation are completely resolved to the requirements established during TPP; Specific Task Requirements: - Restore all areas to their original condition; all access/excavation/detonation holes shall be backfilled to grade. -The Verification Plan and Memo may be modified based on intrusive results. Contractor is responsible for digging additional TOI and non-toi based on previous results and modifications to 19

20 the classification scheme and verification plan. This may include but is not limited to additional geophysical processing, inversion, and classification. -All training digs shall be investigated first and reported to the Project Geophysicist and USACE within 24 hours. -The Government will allow intrusive work to be conducted prior to the final acceptance of a site dig list in accordance with the approved Work Plan and UFP-QAPP. A blind firewall between the intrusive team and processing team must be maintained. 3.9 Task 9, Treatability Study Report: This task is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task. Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of a Treatability Study Report. Performance Standard: The Treatability Study report shall document the results of the field work (Tasks 3-8 of this Task Order), and the Contractor shall prepare the report in accordance with ESTCP Classification Demonstration reporting requirements or as established through TPP. AC: Acceptance of Treatability Study with two revisions. Measurement / Monitoring: Review of results against guidance and DQOs to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided. Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or reperformance of work at contractor s expense. Specific Task Requirements: - An in depth advanced classification processes report shall be included as an appendix providing a separate post-analysis of the detection and cued surveys. - Verification anomalies shall be discussed as appropriate. - Any lessons learned from the RCAs will be discussed as appropriate in an After Action Report. - Provide modified costing for advanced sensor use and classification to supplement the existing FS report. -Update CSM as necessary and provide complete CSM in the format agreed upon during the TPP process Task 10, Community Relations Support and Other Stakeholder Meetings: This task is a Firm Fixed Price task. Objective: Successfully complete public meetings and other stakeholder meetings in support of the Los Angeles District. Performance Standard: Contractor attends and participates in meetings. Meeting materials are accepted by the government as required. AC: Acceptance of meeting materials with two revisions. Meetings held are organized; and professional in nature. Contractor personnel in attendance are thoroughly familiar with the project. Zero letters of reprimand, grievances, or formal complaints. 20