Case 1:16-cv RC Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
|
|
- Nora Dalton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CITIZENS UNITED Plaintiff, v. Case Number: 16-cv-48 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Defendant. DECLARATION OF ERIC F. STEIN Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I, Eric F. Stein, declare and state as follows: 1. I am the Acting Co-Director of the Office of Information Programs and Services ( IPS of the United States Department of State (the Department and have served in this capacity since March 21, I am the Department official immediately responsible for responding to requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552, the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and other applicable records access provisions. Prior to serving in this capacity, from April 2013, I worked directly for the Department s Deputy Assistant Secretary ( DAS for Global Information Services ( GIS and served as a senior advisor and deputy to the DAS on all issues related to GIS offices and programs, which includes IPS. As the Acting IPS Co-Director, I have original classification authority and am authorized to classify and declassify national security information. I make the following statements based upon my personal knowledge, which in turn is based upon information furnished to me in the 1
2 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 2 of 15 course of my official duties. I am familiar with the efforts of Department personnel to process the subject request, and I am in charge of coordinating the agency s search and recovery efforts with respect to that request. 2. The core responsibilities of IPS include: (1 responding to records access requests made by the public (including under the FOIA, the Privacy Act, and the mandatory declassification review requirements of the Executive Order governing classified national security information, by Members of Congress, by other government agencies, and those made pursuant to judicial process such as subpoenas, court orders, and discovery requests; (2 systematic review under the Executive Order; (3 records management; (4 privacy protection; (5 national security classification management and declassification review; (6 corporate records archives management; (7 research; (8 operation and management of the Department s library; and (9 technology applications that support these activities. 3. The purpose of this declaration is to inform the Court about the progress that IPS has made on the processing of Plaintiff s FOIA requests in this case and to provide the Court with information concerning IPS structure and resources. To those ends, this declaration provides (i a summary of Citizens United s ( Plaintiff FOIA request; (ii information concerning the Department s FOIA caseload and resources devoted thereto; and (iii a description of how IPS has handled Plaintiff s FOIA requests to date. seeking I. SUMMARY OF PLAINTIFF S FOIA REQUEST 4. On October 20, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department [A]ll s and other records of communications sent or received by Michael Fuchs, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the State Department Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, to or from the following entities: (1 The Clinton Foundation ( domain addresses for the Clinton 2
3 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 3 of 15 Foundation include but are not @cgepartnership.com, generation.org ; (2 Teneo Holdings ( domain addresses for Teneo Holdings include but are not limited Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to the present. IPS assigned Plaintiff s request case number F On November 2, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department seeking: [A]ll s and other records of communications sent or received by Melanne Verveer, former U.S. Ambassador-At-Large for Global Women s Issues, to or from the following entities: (1 The Clinton Foundation ( domain addresses for the Clinton Foundation include but are not @cgepartnership.com, ; (2 Teneo Holdings ( domain addresses for Teneo Holdings include but are not limited Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to February 28, IPS assigned Plaintiff s request case number F On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department seeking: [A]ll s exchanged between Cheryl Mills and the following individuals associated with the William J. Clinton Foundation, renamed the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation: Eric Braverman; Andrew Kessel; Valerie Alexander; Dennis Cheng; Scott Curran; Amitabh Desai; Rain Henderson; Laura Graham; Mark Gunton; Robert Harrison; Bari Lurie; Terri Mccullough; Patti Miller; Craig Minassian; Walker Morris; Maura Pally; Terry Sheridan; Stephanie S. Streett; Dymphna Van Der Lans; Bruce Lindsey; Chelsea Clinton; Former President Bill Clinton; Frank Giustra; Rolando Gonzalez Bunster; Hadeel Ibrahim; Lisa Jackson; Cheryl Saban, Ph.D; and Richard Verma. Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to May 31, IPS assigned Plaintiff s request case number F
4 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 4 of On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department seeking: [A]ll s exchanged between Cheryl Mills and the following individuals: Declan Kelly, Chairman and CEO, Teneo; Doug Band, President, Teneo; Paul Keary, Chief Operating Officer, Teneo; Michael Madden, Chairman, Teneo Capital; Harry Van Dyke, CEO, Teneo Capital; Chris Wearing, President, Teneo Consulting; Jim Shinn, CEO, Teneo Intelligence; Chris Deri, Managing Director, Teneo Strategy; Richard Powell, President, Teneo Strategy; Orson Porter, Washington D.C. Managing Director, Teneo; Ken Miller, Senior Advisor, Teneo Capital; and Karim Shariff, Teneo Capital Dubai. Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to February 28, IPS assigned Plaintiff s request case number F On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department seeking: [A]ll s exchanged between Huma Abedin and the following individuals: Declan Kelly, Chairman and CEO, Teneo; Doug Band, President, Teneo; Paul Keary, Chief Operating Officer, Teneo; Michael Madden, Chairman, Teneo Capital; Harry Van Dyke, CEO, Teneo Capital; Chris Wearing, President, Teneo Consulting; Jim Shinn, CEO, Teneo Intelligence; Chris Deri, Managing Director, Teneo Strategy; Richard Powell, President, Teneo Strategy; Orson Porter, Washington D.C. Managing Director, Teneo; Ken Miller, Senior Advisor, Teneo Capital; and Karim Shariff, Teneo Capital Dubai. Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to May 31, IPS combined this request with Plaintiff s similar request in paragraph 7 above and also assigned it case number F On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff submitted an online FOIA request to the Department seeking: 4
5 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 5 of 15 [A]ll s exchanged between Huma Abedin and the following individuals associated with the William J. Clinton Foundation, renamed the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation: Eric Braverman; Andrew Kessel; Valerie Alexander; Dennis Cheng; Scott Curran; Amitabh Desai; Rain Henderson; Laura Graham; Mark Gunton; Robert Harrison; Bari Lurie; Terri Mccullough; Patti Miller; Craig Minassian; Walker Morris; Maura Pally; Terry Sheridan; Stephanie S. Streett; Dymphna Van Der Lans; Bruce Lindsey; Chelsea Clinton; Former President Bill Clinton; Frank Giustra; Rolando Gonzalez Bunster; Hadeel Ibrahim; Lisa Jackson; Cheryl Saban, Ph.D; and Richard Verma. Plaintiff s request covered the time period from January 1, 2009, to May 31, IPS assigned Plaintiff request case number F , Plaintiff filed the instant action based on all of the above listed requests on January II. THE DEPARTMENT S FOIA CASELOAD AND DOCUMENT REVIEW PROCESS 11. Over the past several years, the Department s FOIA caseload has greatly increased. In FY 2008, the Department received fewer than 6,000 new FOIA and Privacy Act requests; that number of new FOIA and Privacy Act requests annually increased, reaching nearly 25,000 in FY 2015 (an increase of over 300%. By the end of Fiscal Year 2015, the Department had nearly 22,000 FOIA and Privacy Act requests pending. The Department currently has approximately 29,000 FOIA and Privacy Act requests pending and is engaged in 106 FOIA litigation cases, many of which involve court-ordered document production schedules. At a time when the FOIA caseload is increasing dramatically, the funds available to process FOIA requests have remained nearly constant since Fiscal Year For instance, the Department spent approximately $16.5 million in FY 2013, $15.9 million in FY 2014, and $16.3 in FY 2015 on FOIA personnel costs associated with processing FOIA requests. 12. The review process undertaken by IPS, which follows the searches throughout the 5
6 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 6 of 15 Department for potentially responsive documents, is involved and complex. Because IPS s document review system, known as FREEDOMS 2 (or F2 cannot ingest most forms of electronic data, most of the potentially responsive documents must be printed (if they were provided to IPS in an electronic format and then scanned into F2. Each document is assigned a unique identification number, and an IPS employee manually inputs certain bibliographic data associated with each document, such as the date, to, from, and subject line (if available. IPS then assigns those documents for review to an IPS employee, or reviewer, with appropriate clearance and subject matter expertise to handle that set of documents. 13. The reviewer performs a line-by-line review of the document to determine whether the document is responsive to the request, whether it contains any classified or other sensitive information that must be withheld under one of the nine FOIA exemptions, and whether it contains information belonging to other federal agencies. During this process, the reviewer may consult other Department employees (including, for example, employees in regional bureaus or attorneys as s/he sees fit. These consultations often occur more than once in the process and are extremely important, particularly when the documents being reviewed were created around the same time they were requested under the FOIA. The bureaus being consulted are the most knowledgeable parties concerning the sensitivity of the documents or subject matter at issue. For instance, such documents may concern the views or activities of individuals who could suffer reprisals if their identities or opinions are revealed. The documents may also reflect certain policies, activities, or other information of a heightened sensitivity to U.S. foreign relations. Consequently, IPS requires its reviewers to clear documents that were created within the previous five years and contain substantive information with the relevant bureaus prior to finalizing release determinations. In addition to clearing with 6
7 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 7 of 15 relevant regional and functional bureaus and offices, all documents must be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser, a process that often involves consultations between the attorneyadviser and IPS as well as with other Department offices. 14. If the reviewer determines that a document originated with the Department, but contains another federal agency s information (or equities, an IPS employee will send that document to the relevant federal agency for consultation. If the reviewer determines that a document originated with another federal agency, s/he redacts any Department information that must be withheld under the FOIA, and the document is sent to that federal agency for review and direct reply to the requester. The Department will also refer a document to an outside organization whenever its confidential business information may be at issue in accordance with Executive Order and 22 C.F.R to allow that organization the opportunity to object to the disclosure of the information on the basis that the information in the document is exempt from disclosure under FOIA Exemption 4, 15 U.S.C. 552(b( Finally, for cases that are in litigation, documents proposed for release must be reviewed by attorney-advisers within the Office of the Legal Adviser, a process that often involves consultations between the attorney advisers and IPS as well as other Department Offices. 16. After completing the internal and external consultation processes, the reviewer redacts any information that must be withheld under the FOIA and marks the documents that the Department will release in full or in part with the required stamps, indicating the release determinations and FOIA exemptions applied. If the reviewer completing this process is relatively inexperienced then his or her work must undergo second-level review by a senior reviewer to ensure that FOIA exemptions were properly applied to the document and 7
8 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 8 of 15 consultations with relevant Department bureaus and federal agencies occurred. After this process is completed, the Department provides those documents to the requester with a cover letter indicating that responsive documents were located, which (if any exemptions were applied to documents withheld in full or in part (including a list of the available FOIA exemptions, and whether the requester should expect to receive additional release determinations from the Department in the future or whether the Department s response to the request is complete. The Department also provides an explanatory letter in the event that no responsive documents were located or all responsive documents were withheld in full. 17. The Department engages the services of approximately 71 part-time, retired Foreign Service Officers 1, some of whom have served as Ambassadors, to serve as subject matter experts in reviewing potentially responsive documents for Department equities, to make inter-agency consultations, and to apply appropriate FOIA exemptions to protect exempt information. 18. However, only 15 of these part-time reviewers are dedicated to IPS s 106 FOIA litigation cases, while the remaining are assigned to work on the approximately 29,000 FOIA requests that are not in litigation. Due to the growing number of cases in active litigation, the Department has been assigning some non-litigation reviewers to litigation cases on an ad-hoc basis in order to meet the demands of various court ordered production schedules. Today, more than 80 percent of these non-litigation reviewers are being used to do work on litigation cases to meet existing production deadlines required by court orders. 1 Each of these retired Foreign Service hours has an individual work schedule varying from 16 to 40 hours per week. The exact number of reviewers is in flux at any given point in time, as many of these reviewers work schedules vary throughout the calendar year. 8
9 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 9 of The Department is currently subject to court orders in at least 27 of its active litigation matters that, in sum, require the Department to process 2 a minimum of approximately 7,500 pages per month. The Department reasonably anticipates that new court-ordered production schedules will continue to be imposed in coming months. In addition, the litigation reviewers continue to review documents for release in the approximately 23 additional litigation matters in which the Department is currently still producing documents. Due to competing Court deadlines and the part-time nature of reviewer s schedules, reviewer resources are often shifting between cases, and one reviewer could be handling as many as four litigation cases in any given month. 20. IPS s ability to increase the number of reviewers is constrained by the availability of existing financial resources and also by the need for reviewers to possess the necessary security clearances and subject matter expertise to review materials related to U.S. foreign relations and diplomacy that may be responsive to FOIA requests. IPS cannot determine, based on a request alone, whether any of the responsive material will be classified. Moreover, pursuant to its authority under Executive Order 13526, IPS may determine to classify information responsive to a FOIA request (for example, IPS may determine that certain unmarked information or information marked unclassified must be classified at the confidential or secret level. Finally, F2 operates on a classified network, which requires any reviewers using the system to hold a security clearance of at least the SECRET level. Consequently, IPS reviewers must have clearances because they cannot know from the outset whether they will be handling classified information and because they need the clearances to 2 Process means reviewing a document and (1 determining whether it is responsive to the request; (2 referring the document to another agency or organization for consultation, if necessary; or (3 producing the document (with redactions if appropriate to Plaintiff. 9
10 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 10 of 15 operate in F2, the document review system. III. STATE S SEARCH FOR AND REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS RESPONSIVE TO PLAINTIFF S FOIA REQUESTS 21. After Plaintiff s FOIA requests were submitted, the Department identified the Executive Secretariat, Office of Global Women s Issues, Bureau of Information Resource Management, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, and IPS as the offices that were reasonably likely to possess documents responsive to these requests. The Department also identified its Retired Records Inventory Management System ( RIMS as another place that responsive documents were likely to be found. 22. After these office conducted searches of their records and IPS conducted a search of RIMS and documents provided to the Department in 2015 by former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, and former Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin, the Department identified 6,082 documents that were potentially responsive to Plaintiff s requests and reported this number to this Court in its March 18, 2016, status report. The Department also reported that it believed that these results were over inclusive and that it was likely that a much smaller number of documents would end up being responsive to Plaintiff s requests because various offices conducted searches using the names of the non-state individuals listed in Plaintiff s requests. Such a search would necessarily capture any communication referencing that individual, but not sent to or from that individual, a category that would not be responsive to the requests described above. The results of the Department s sample responsiveness review of 300 of these 6,082 documents, in which it found 126 documents were responsive to Plaintiffs requests, further supported this belief. The Department provided the results of this sample responsiveness review to the Court in 10
11 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 11 of 15 its March 18, 2016, status report to help it evaluate the volume of potentially responsive material and the time required to complete production. 23. After submitting its March 18, 2016, status report, the Department discovered errors in the manner in which the searches had been conducted in order to capture documents potentially responsive to Plaintiff s requests. Specifically, it found that one office had not conducted the search by keyword, but rather had only searched the To and From line of the latest in an communication, a method that would not capture responsive s found only in older communications that were part of an chain. This led the Department to conduct a new search to ensure that all responsive material was captured. After this search, the number of potentially responsive documents increased substantially to 34, IPS then conducted a document-by-document responsiveness review of these 34,116 documents and found that 5,883 documents were responsive 3 to the Plaintiff s requests and that these documents encompassed approximately 14,369 pages. This number of 5,883 responsive documents is considerably more documents to review than the Department initially anticipated, as reported to the Court in it its March 18, 2016, status report and described in paragraph 22 above. 25. While the Department has worked diligently to ingest these documents into its review system (F2 and undertake the above-described review process in this case, further work still needs to be done by the Department to identify the universe of responsive documents. Due to some errors recently identified with the responsiveness review, some attachments to responsive s were inadvertently marked as non-responsive. As a result, 3 This number was reported to the Court in the Department s May 17, 2016, status report. As the Department noted in this report, this responsiveness review focused on headers and it is possible that upon full exemption review of the body of these s, certain documents may later be determined to be non-responsive, if, for example they do not constitute agency records. 11
12 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 12 of 15 IPS is currently re-doing this responsiveness review in order to ensure that no responsive e- mail attachments were missed. This process is very time intensive and requires that IPS manually open and review each with an attachment amongst the 34,116 documents that were identified as potentially responsive to Plaintiff s requests. Hence, as there may be additional attachments that are potentially responsive, the total number of potentially responsive documents to review may increase. The substantive review process in this case is also challenging given the wide-ranging subject matters covered by the documents at issue, which implicate equities across the Department. As a result, reviewers in this case are consulting Department employees in multiple bureaus, including the Bureaus of Western Hemisphere Affairs, European and Eurasian Affairs, East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Economic and Business Affairs, and Public Affairs, and the Office of the Under Secretary for Management. The number of different bureaus and documents involved in such consultations necessarily increases IPS s review time. Additionally, Plaintiff s requests cover communications with outside organizations, and the Department must send documents to these organizations for consultation whenever their confidential business information may be at issue before these documents can be produced. Given the nature of the requests at issue, the Department anticipates that it will have to make a large number of such consultations. This further slows down its review, as the Department cannot anticipate what objections these organizations may have concerning disclosure of their information and how long it will take to resolve such issues. Finally, as with many cases, State must consult with other agencies within the U.S. Government regarding these documents as appropriate. 26. Department resources also limit the pace of review in this matter. Four of the parttime reviewers assigned to this matter are new and are still receiving training on the application 12
13 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 13 of 15 of FOIA and Privacy Act Exemptions, Executive Order 13526, and other relevant statutes and regulations, and on the use of F2. Consequently, these reviewers are not able to review documents as quickly as those who are more experienced. Their lack of experience also requires that their work be reviewed by a senior reviewer, an additional step that also slows the pace of review. Two part-time senior reviewers are currently splitting these duties in this matter because they are both working on several other cases as well as spending time training IPS s new litigation reviewers. 4 The Department is working to meet this Court s production deadlines. Pursuant to this Court s order, the Department made productions of documents to Plaintiff on April 22, 2016, May 23, 2016, and June 22, Aside from the attachments issue noted in paragraph 25, the Department estimates that it still has approximately 13,679 pages to review in this case. 27. Due to the shifting nature of litigation demands and the number of new and inexperienced reviewers on this matter, it is difficult to precisely estimate how quickly review of documents responsive to Plaintiff s requests could be completed. Based on the FOIA and Privacy Act demands IPS is currently facing, the limited number of part-time reviewers currently working on litigation matters, the fact that many of those part-time reviewers, including those working on this case, are inexperienced, and the bottleneck caused by limited senior reviewer capacity, I estimate that the Department is able to review documents for releasability at a rate no faster than 500 pages a month, this figure takes into account both the number of pages produced to Plaintiff, either in full or in part, and those reviewed and 4 One senior reviewer in this case is handling five additional cases and is able to dedicate 16 hours a week to this case. The other senior reviewer is handling four additional cases and is able to dedicate a maximum of eight hours a week to this case. Three of the less experienced reviewers on this case are also each working on one additional case. 13
14 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 14 of 15 determined to be non-responsive or denied in full under the FOIA. 5 It does not reflect those documents that are reviewed by one of IPS s reviewers and then referred externally or internally for further consultation. However, this rate of review for releasability is subject to the consultation process the Department must undertake pursuant to Executive Order 12600, and this may significantly affect the Department s ability to review its goal of 500 pages in some months. 28. At this rate, it would take the Department approximately 27 months to complete its review and produce all of the non-exempt information responsive to Plaintiff s requests although additional time may be necessary if there are significantly more attachments determined to be responsive. 29. Due to the increasingly limited capacity of the Department to commit to the processing of additional pages in any FOIA litigation case, the Department has recently undertaken the task of identifying statistics that would allow the Department to best quantify the work currently underway throughout IPS in non-litigation and litigation cases and the amount of resources available to address that workload. As a result of that analysis, the Department anticipates that its future review capabilities will be more modest. Simply put, any increase beyond the 500 pages per month that the Department will aspire to review in this case would limit the Department s ability to meet its existing FOIA obligations in numerous other cases. IV. CONCLUSION 5 I estimate that, on average, a reviewer is able to finalize approximately pages per month. The term finalized describes the stage at which documents have had their redactions burned. This estimate therefore takes into account the completion of external consultations, either with another agency or an outside organization. However, due to the inexperience of the reviewers in this matter, I am unable to draw any conclusions from this figure with respect to how many documents a month they are able to finalize. 14
15 Case Document 12-1 Filed 06/29/16 Page 15 of 15
Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 13 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) REPUBLICAN NATIONAL ) COMMITTEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:16-CV-00486-JEB
More information9/2/2015. The National Security Exemption. Exemption 1. Exemption 1
The National Security Exemption ASAP 2015 FOIA-Privacy Act Training Workshop Threshold language:[records] (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5405.2 July 23, 1985 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00785 Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 ) Washington, DC 20024,
More informationAPPENDIX N. GENERIC DOCUMENT TEMPLATE, DISTRIBUTION STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENT DATA SHEET and THE IMPORTANCE OF MARKING DOCUMENTS
APPENDIX N GENERIC DOCUMENT TEMPLATE, DISTRIBUTION STATEMENTS AND DOCUMENT DATA SHEET and THE IMPORTANCE OF MARKING DOCUMENTS This Appendix describes requirements for using a standardized document template,
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5200.01 October 9, 2008 SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information References: See Enclosure 1 USD(I) 1. PURPOSE.
More informationCase 1:16-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00461-ABJ Document 19 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:16-CV-461 (ABJ UNITED
More informationCase 1:17-cv JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01167-JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1167-JEB FEDERAL
More informationSUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is revising its procedures
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/30/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-17836, and on FDsys.gov 9110-9B DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
More informationDefense Security Service Academy OCA Desk Reference Guide
Defense Security Service Academy OCA Desk Reference Guide May 007 Final Page OCA Decision Aid The safety and security of the United States depend upon the protection of sensitive information. Classification
More informationCase 1:14-cv RCL Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01242-RCL Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-cv-1242 (RCL) U.S.
More informationREPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005
REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY As part of its responsibilities to oversee agency actions to ensure compliance with Executive Order 12958,
More informationVERIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTING GRS 6.1: MANAGED UNDER A CAPSTONE APPROACH
FOR NARA USE ONLY Number GRS6.1-0263-2017-0001 Received Date Dec 20, 2016 Total Accounts 426 Agencies are reminded that NARA reserves the right to review agency email practices and records. Pursuant to
More informationCase 1:15-cv APM Document 48 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00692-APM Document 48 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-00692 (APM) ) U.S.
More informationNATO UNCLASSIFIED ARCHIVES COMMITTEE. Directive on the Public Disclosure of NATO Information
04 August 2014 DOCUMENT ARCHIVES COMMITTEE Directive on the Public Disclosure of NATO Information The Directive on the Public Disclosure of NATO Information was approved by the Archives Committee under
More informationStudent Guide Course: Original Classification
Course: Original Classification Lesson: Course Introduction Course Information Purpose Audience Pass/Fail % Estimated completion time Define original classification and identify the process for determining
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Public
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5210.50 July 22, 2005 USD(I) SUBJECT: Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Public References: (a) DoD Directive 5210.50, subject as above, February
More informationStudent Guide: Controlled Unclassified Information
Length Two (2) hours Description This course covers the Department of Defense policies on the disclosure of official information. In addition, the nine exemption categories of the Freedom of Information
More informationIdentification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information
ORDER DOE O 471.1B Approved: Identification and Protection of Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Health, Safety and Security DOE O 471.1B 1 IDENTIFICATION
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5230.27 November 18, 2016 Incorporating Change 1, September 15, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Presentation of DoD-Related Scientific and Technical Papers at Meetings
More informationDOD MANUAL DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROGRAM
DOD MANUAL 5400.07 DOD FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROGRAM Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: January 25, 2017 Releasability:
More informationEXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (Federal Register Vol. 40, No. 235 (December 8, 1981), amended by EO 13284 (2003), EO 13355 (2004), and EO 13470 (2008)) PREAMBLE Timely, accurate,
More informationTECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES, AND OF MILITARY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, FROM RELEASE UNDER FREEDOM OF
1 9 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 0 1 SEC.. EXEMPTION OF INFORMATION ON MILITARY TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES, AND OF MILITARY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, FROM RELEASE UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. (a) EXEMPTION.
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1010 October 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES
More informationSubj: PROVISION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DOCUMENTARY MATERIAL
D E PAR TME NT OF THE N A VY OFFICE OF T HE SECRET ARY 1000 NAVY PENT AGON WASHINGT ON D C 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 5000.37 DONCIO SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5000.37 From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: PROVISION OF
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS (ATSD(PA))
DOD DIRECTIVE 5122.05 ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS (ATSD(PA)) Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: August
More informationCase 1:13-cv EGS Document 48 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01363-EGS Document 48 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-1363 (EGS)
More informationCase 1:06-cv RBW Document 10-3 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 6. Exhibit B
Case 1:06-cv-01773-RBW Document 10-3 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 6 Exhibit B Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice, Civ. No. 06-1773-RBW Motion for Preliminary Injunction Case 1:06-cv-01773-RBW
More informationHomeland Security. u.s. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC April I, 2010
u.s. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 April I, 2010 Homeland Security Mr. Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists 1725 DeSales Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036
More informationDirective on United States Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts June 24, 2015
Administration of Barack Obama, 2015 Directive on United States Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts June 24, 2015 Presidential Policy Directive/PPD 30 Subject: U.S. Nationals
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-00561 (RCL U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Defendant. PLAINTIFF S OPPOSITION TO
More informationFOIA PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FOIA PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests that we reviewed appeared to be processed generally in compliance with the FOIA. Some areas needed improvement, as discussed
More informationSUMMARY FOR CONFORMING CHANGE #1 TO DoDM , National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)
Cover Page annotated as Incorporating Change 1, noting date of the change Table of Contents has been updated throughout document to reflect current page alignment (Page 2-12) References have been updated
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5240.04 February 2, 2009 USD(I) SUBJECT: Counterintelligence (CI) Investigations References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction reissues DoD Instruction
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY (VSP) PROGRAM FOR SERVICE MEMBERS
DOD INSTRUCTION 1332.43 VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY (VSP) PROGRAM FOR SERVICE MEMBERS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Effective: November 28, 2017
More informationDerivative Classifier Training
As a cleared contractor employee that creates classified materials you are considered a derivative classifier as outlined in the presidents Executive Order (E.O.) 13526. Page 1 of 21 Derivative classifiers
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301-1010 June 17, 2009 Incorporating Change 6, effective September 10, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN
More informationOFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATION At INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATION At INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511 Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists 1725 DeSales Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 ~ov 2 5 2015 Reference: ODNI
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5240.04 April 1, 2016 Incorporating Change 1, Effective April 26, 2018 USD(I) SUBJECT: Counterintelligence (CI) Investigations References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
More informationRelease of Official Information and Appearance of Witnesses in Litigation
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/14/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-29835, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 5001-03 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5110.4 October 19, 2001 DA&M SUBJECT: Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) References: (a) Title 10 of the United States Code, "Armed Forces" (b) DoD Directive
More informationSUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION
SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION.0100 - ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION 09 NCAC 03M.0101 PURPOSE Pursuant to G.S. 143C-6-23, the rules in this Subchapter
More informationAddress: 62 Britton Street, London, EC1M 5UY, Great Britain Phone: +44 (0) Website:
Address: 62 Britton Street, London, EC1M 5UY, Great Britain Phone: +44 (0) 20 3422 4321 Website: www.privacyinternational.org December 13, 2016 VIA FACSIMILE AND POST National Security Agency ATTN: FOIA
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Disclosure of Classified Military Information to Foreign Governments and International Organizations
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5230.11 June 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Disclosure of Classified Military Information to Foreign Governments and International Organizations USD(P) References: (a) DoD Directive
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5710.25B N3/N5L OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5710.25B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: INTERNATIONAL
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. Inspector General of the Department of Defense (IG DoD)
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5106.01 April 20, 2012 DA&M SUBJECT: Inspector General of the Department of Defense (IG DoD) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive reissues DoD Directive
More informationv. : 18 U.S.C. 371, 951 & 2 MICHAEL RAY AQUINO, : I N D I C T M E N T a/k/a "Ninoy" The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,
2005R00881/SJR/KHB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No. 05- v. : 18 U.S.C. 371, 951 & 2 MICHAEL RAY AQUINO, : I N D I C T M E N T a/k/a "Ninoy" The
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 5370.7C NAVINSGEN SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5370.7C From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWER
More informationINTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501 DISCOVERY AND DISSEMINATION OR RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (EFFECTIVE: 21 JANUARY 2009) A. AUTHORITY: The National Security Act
More informationReporting Period: June 1, 2013 November 30, October 2014 TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN
(U) SEMIANNUAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 702 OF THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT, SUBMITTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE DIRECTOR OF
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1010 June 21, 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 17-007 Interim Policy and Guidance for
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5210.48 December 24, 1984 USD(P) SUBJECT: DoD Polygraph Program References: (a) DoD Directive 5210.48, "Polygraph Examinations and Examiners," October 6, 1975 (hereby
More informationSECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1000 10 MAR 08 Incorporating Change 1 September 23, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS
More informationReview of the SEC s Compliance with the Freedom of Information Act
Review of the SEC s Compliance with the Freedom of Information Act Prepared by: Elizabeth A. Bunker, Contractor September 25, 2009 Page i Review of the Securities and Exchange Commission s Compliance with
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5200.39 September 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Security, Intelligence, and Counterintelligence Support to Acquisition Program Protection ASD(C3I) References: (a) DoD Directive
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 65-302 23 AUGUST 2018 Financial Management EXTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO A INT 29 Aug 89
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC 20380-0001 MARINE CORPS ORDER 5510.16A MCO 5510.16A INT From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: USMC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRANT F. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-01431 (TSC CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Grant F. Smith, proceeding
More informationAAHRPP Accreditation Procedures Approved April 22, Copyright AAHRPP. All rights reserved.
AAHRPP Accreditation Procedures Approved April 22, 2014 Copyright 2014-2002 AAHRPP. All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS The AAHRPP Accreditation Program... 3 Reaccreditation Procedures... 4 Accreditable
More informationUNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. PRIMARY ORDER. A verified application having been made by the Director of
-7 DPSYCRETncomENT-#140-Ficabl 1 UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. IN RE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING THE PRODUCTION OF
More informationUNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT (UOCAVA) (As modified by the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2010)
UNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT (UOCAVA) (As modified by the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2010) TITLE I REGISTRATION AND VOTING BY ABSENT UNIFORMED SERVICE VOTERS AND OVERSEAS
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5230.27 October 6, 1987 USD(A) SUBJECT: Presentation of DoD-Related Scientific and Technical Papers at Meetings References: (a) DoD Directive 3200.12, "DoD Scientific
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 73-1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J.
More informationCase 3:10-cv AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:10-cv-01972-AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA ) CONNECTICUT GREATER HARTFORD ) CHAPTER 120 and
More informationThis page left blank.
This page left blank. Introduction 2 Reminders 2 SECTION 1 Originally Classified Documents 3 Portion Marking 5 Overall Classification Marking 6 Classification Authority Block Classified By line 7 Reason
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20301-1010 April 9, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF
More information) V. ) Civil Action No. 1: (PLF)
Case 1:05-cv-00475-PLF Document 16 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 2 of 7 UNITED SiATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SCOTT BJNGHA Plaintif, V. Civil Action No. 1:05-00475 (PLF UNITEDSTATESDEPARTiNT OF JUSTICE,
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5230.24 March 18, 1987 USD(A) SUBJECT: Distribution Statements on Technical Documents References: (a) DoD Directive 5230.24, subject as above, November 20, 1984 (hereby
More informationCommercial Solutions Opening (CSO) Office of the Secretary of Defense Defense Innovation Unit (Experimental)
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Authority Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) Office of the Secretary of Defense Defense Innovation Unit (Experimental) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR)
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reviews and Reports
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 7650.02 November 20, 2006 Incorporating Change 1, Effective January 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reviews and Reports IG DoD DCMO References:
More informationo Department of Defense DIRECTIVE DoD Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality (NAFI) Employee Whistleblower Protection
o Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1401.03 June 13, 2014 IG DoD SUBJECT: DoD Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality (NAFI) Employee Whistleblower Protection References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
More informationI. Preamble: II. Parties:
I. Preamble: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE SUBJECT: Clearance of DoD Information for Public Release References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 5230.09 August 22, 2008 Certified Current Through August 22, 2015 DA&M 1. PURPOSE.
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 5200.45 April 2, 2013 Incorporating Change 1, Effective April 6, 2018 USD(I) SUBJECT: Instructions for Developing Security Classification Guides References: See Enclosure
More informationTHE NATIONAL DECLASSIFICATION. Releasing What We Can, Protecting What We Must
THE NATIONAL DECLASSIFICATION CENTER Releasing What We Can, Protecting What We Must Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist for Records Services National Archives and Records Administration National Declassification
More informationHIPAA Privacy Rule and Sharing Information Related to Mental Health
HIPAA Privacy Rule and Sharing Information Related to Mental Health Background The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule provides consumers with important privacy rights
More information[Federal Register: August 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 154)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 46051-46071] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr10au06-8] [[Page 46051]]
More informationCase 1:17-cv CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:17-cv-01928-CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADAM JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17 Civ. 1928 (CM) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
More informationRobert J. Hanson Supervisory SECURITY SPECIALIST Command Security Manager Staff CMS Responsible Officer Designated Disclosure Authority Head,
Robert J. Hanson Supervisory SECURITY SPECIALIST Command Security Manager Staff CMS Responsible Officer Designated Disclosure Authority Head, Security Branch COMMAND SECURITY Information and Personnel
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER O-5205.13 April 26, 2012 DoD CIO SUBJECT: Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CS/IA) Program Security Classification Manual (SCM)
More informationTexas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 19 Public Transportation. (a) Purpose. Title 49 U.S.C. 5329, authorizes the
Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 SUBCHAPTER D. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.. Public Transit Safety Program. (a) Purpose. Title U.S.C., authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. DOT to create and implement
More informationCase 3:16-cv SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION.
Case 3:16-cv-00995-SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION TENREC, INC., SERGII SINIENOK, WALKER MACY LLC, XIAOYANG ZHU, and all others
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 07-00403 (TFH) ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT S
More informationNational Security Agency
National Security Agency 9 August 2013 The National Security Agency: Missions, Authorities, Oversight and Partnerships balance between our need for security and preserving those freedoms that make us who
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 17, January 17, 2014
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 17, 2014 January 17, 2014 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-28 SUBJECT: Signals Intelligence Activities The United States, like
More informationUnited States District Court
Case 1:17-mj-00024-BKE Document 5 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 1 A091(Rcv. 11/1 1) Criminal Complaint United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia United States of America V. REALITY LEIGH
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00545 Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER 1718 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 200
More informationDOE B, SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC SYMBOL, AND OTHER CHANGES HAVE BEEN BY THE REVISIONS,
DOE 1270.2B THIS WITH PAGE MUST BE KEPT THE INTERNATIONAL WITH DOE 1270.2B, SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. DOE 1270.2B, SAFEGUARDS AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, HAS
More informationCase 1:98-cv TPJ Document 40 Filed 03/05/02 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. C.A.
Case 1:98-cv-02737-TPJ Document 40 Filed 03/05/02 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT, Plaintiff, v. C.A. 98-2737 NA TIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
More informationSecurity Classification Guidance v3
Security Classification Guidance v3 September 2017 Center for Development of Security Excellence Lesson 1: Course Introduction Course Overview Welcome to the Security Classification Guidance Course. The
More informationNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE Lee Road Chantilly, VA
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 14675 Lee Road Chantilly, VA 20151-1715 B June 2017 Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists 1725 DeSales Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 REF: NRO Case
More informationDerivative Classification Requirements
MARFORPAC SECURITY Derivative Classification Requirements 2009 (original thought not required) UNCLASSIFIED Sources of Requirements President Issues Executive Orders NSC National Security Council Sets
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE PAST CONFLICT PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING POLICY
DOD DIRECTIVE 2310.07 PAST CONFLICT PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING POLICY Originating Component: Effective: Change 1 Effective: Releasability: Reissues and Cancels: Approved by: Change 1 Approved by: Office of the
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION AVIATION HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS (AHIRAPS)
DOD INSTRUCTION 6055.19 AVIATION HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS (AHIRAPS) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT
DOD DIRECTIVE 5148.13 INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: April 26, 2017 Releasability: Cleared for public
More informationOrthopedic Specialty Clinic, Ltd. Updated 05/2014
Orthopedic Specialty Clinic, Ltd. Updated 05/2014 THIS NOTICE DESCRIBES HOW MEDICAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU MAY BE USED AND DISCLOSED AND HOW YOU CAN GET ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION. PLEASE REVIEW IT CAREFULLY.
More informationRFI /14 STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
RFI 002-13/14 STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) to provide on a contingency fee basis recovery audit services for the
More informationCase 1:12-cv ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00327-ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil
More informationOPEN ACCELERATOR. Introduction
OPEN ACCELERATOR Z-Cube Call for Applications for the OPEN ACCELERATOR Program 2017. Dedicated to the aspiring entrepreneurs in the life science field who are eager to receive accelerated training and
More informationState of Florida Department of Children and Families
State of Florida Department of Children and Families Rick Scott Governor Mike Carroll Secretary REQUEST FOR INFORMATION #23FS16006 Behavioral Health Training for the Child Protective Investigation Professional
More information