IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
|
|
- Kathleen Barton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No (RCL U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Defendant. PLAINTIFF S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Judicial Watch, Inc. ( Judicial Watch, by counsel and pursuant to Rule 56(f of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respectfully submits this opposition to Defendant Food and Drug Administration s ( FDA motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. As grounds therefor, Judicial Watch states as follows: I. Introduction. MEMORANDUM OF LAW Ours is a government of laws, laws duly promulgated and laws duly observed. No one is above the law: not the executive, not the Congress, and not the judiciary. One of our laws is the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA. That law, no less than any other, must be duly observed. American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep t of Defense, 339 F. Supp. 2d 501, 502 (S.D.N.Y (internal citations omitted. This statement is one regarding which the FDA needs reminding. Inexplicably, after not one, but three instances of non-compliance, the FDA now seeks dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment. The FDA s non-compliance is replete throughout this case; indeed, it is the reason for this
2 case. When served with a FOIA request on August 22, 2006, the FDA did no more than acknowledge its receipt. Only after the FDA was served with a lawsuit after its near-seven months of silence, did the FDA produce records responsive to Judicial Watch s August 26, 2006 request. Similarly, when served with two related FOIA requests in mid-april 2007, the FDA did no more than acknowledge receipt of the requests. It was only after the Court permitted Judicial Watch to amend its complaint to include these two additional claims of non-compliance that the FDA produced records responsive to Judicial Watch s April 2007 requests. Even with the productions, the FDA is still not complying with its FOIA obligations. Namely, the searches performed by the FDA were not reasonable. As evidence of this, are numerous demonstrated examples of missing information as well as the FDA s insufficiently detailed declarations. Despite the FDA s oleaginous assertions to the contrary, genuine issues of material fact do remain and summary judgment should not be granted. II. Argument. A. Summary Judgment Standard. In FOIA litigation, as in all litigation, summary judgment is appropriate only when the pleadings and declarations demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986; Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c. In FOIA cases, the agency decisions to withhold or disclose information under FOIA are reviewed de novo by this court. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service, 297 F. Supp. 2d 252, 256 (D.D.C In reviewing a motion for summary judgment under FOIA, the court must view the facts in the light most favorable to the requestor. Weisberg v. United States Dep t of Justice, 745 F.2d 1476, 1485 (D.C. Cir
3 For an agency to prevail, it must prove that each document that falls within the class requested either has been produced, is unidentifiable, or is wholly exempt from the Act s inspection requirements. Goland v. CIA, 607 F.2d 339, 352 (D.C. Cir Summary judgment is not appropriate in this case because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the adequacy of the FDA s searches. B. The FDA Failed to Conduct a Reasonable Search. FOIA mandates that government agencies make reasonable efforts to search for records responsive to a FOIA request. 5 U.S.C. 552(a(2(E(ii(C. The law of this Circuit regarding the reasonableness of agency FOIA searches is clear. In responding to a FOIA request, an agency is required to show that it made a good faith effort to conduct a search for the requested records, using methods that can be reasonably expected to produce the information requested. Nation Magazine v. United States Customs Service, 71 F.3d 885, 890 (D.C. Cir (quoting Oglesby v. United States Dept. of the Army, 920 F.2d 57, 68 (D.C. Cir An agency is not required to search every record system, but it cannot limit its search to only one record system if there are others likely to turn up the information requested. Campbell v. United States Dept. of Justice, 164 F.3d 20, 28 (D.C. Cir. 1998; Oglesby, 920 F.2d at 68. The burden of persuasion as to the reasonableness of a search falls on the agency. McGhee v. CIA, 697 F.2d 1095, 1101 (D.C. Cir Any affidavit(s submitted by the agency describing its search for documents must be relatively detailed and non-conclusory, and... submitted in good faith. Safecard Services, Inc. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197, 1200 (D.C. Cir (quoting Ground Saucer Watch, Inc. v. CIA, 692 F.2d 770, 771 (D.C. Cir At the very least, the affidavit must denote which files the agency searched, and must explain in a systematic 3
4 way how the agency s documents were located in order to enable the Plaintiff to challenge the procedures utilized during the search. Oglesby, 920 F.2d at 68. Additionally, if the reasonableness of the search is challenged, as it is in this case, the agency must demonstrate beyond a material doubt that the search was reasonable. Truitt v. Dep t of State, 897 F.2d 540, 542 (D.C. Cir (quoting Weisberg v. U.S. Dep t of Justice, 705 F.2d 1344, 1351 (D.C. Cir Missing Records Demonstrate That the FDA Did Not Conduct a Reasonable Search. Agencies are required to make more than perfunctory searches and, indeed, to follow through on obvious leads to discover requested documents. Valencia-Lucena v. U.S. Coast Gaurd, 180 F.3d 321, 325 (D.C. Cir This requirement is fulfilled only if the agency can demonstrate beyond a material doubt that its search was reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents. Id. (quoting Truitt, 897 F.2d at 542. The FDA has failed to demonstrate that it conducted reasonable searches for records responsive to Judicial Watch s requests. Several examples of missing information highlight this point. First, in the Murray production, the FDA included a copy of a portion of a U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee hearing transcript. See Exhibit 1 attached hereto. In response to a question posed by Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro concerning meetings with FDA officials regarding Barr Laboratories application for Plan B over-the-counter status, the response included reference to a briefing given by Dr. Crawford and Dr. Galson to Senators Murray, Clinton, and Kennedy on April 6, Id. Missing from both the Clinton and Murray productions is the briefing material used for that meeting. It is simply unreasonable to think that two medical 4
5 doctors, one the acting director of the FDA s Center For Drug Evaluation and Research at the time, would brief three sitting U.S. Senators and not rely on any notes or written information. Second, all three productions include only the Senators Questions for the Record for Dr. Andrew C. Von Eschenbach, rather than any records of Dr. Von Eschenbach s nomination. 1 Dr. Von Eschenbach is the current FDA Commissioner and his role in obtaining over-the-counter status for Plan B was the subject of much consternation from both sides of the debate, including the very public hold Senators Clinton and Murray placed on Dr. Von Eschenbach s nomination. Surely, the FDA res records regarding Dr. Von Eschenbach s nomination. In fact, in an August 7, 2006 statement and press release, Senator Clinton stated that she questioned Dr. Von Eschenbach about recess appointments. See Exhibit 2, attached hereto. Senator Clinton s Questions of Record contain no such question. See Exhibit 3, attached hereto. Third, Judicial Watch maintains that it is highly unlikely that the FDA has no records of any kind regarding the hold Senators Clinton and Murray placed on Dr. Von Eschenbach s nomination. Senators Clinton and Murray were very public about placing the hold on Dr. Von Eschenbach s nomination, and all three Senators arranged a meeting with him. The assertion that no correspondence or records resulted from either the meeting, or the hold, is risible. 2. Inadequately Detailed Declarations Fail to Support the FDA s Search. To demonstrate the reasonableness of its search, the agency s affidavits must be relatively detailed, nonconclusory, and submitted in good faith. Founding Church of Scientology v. NSA, 610 F.2d 824, 836 (D.C. Cir Because of the peculiarities inherent in 1 All three productions included records on the March 17, 2005 nomination of Dr. Lester Crawford. 5
6 FOIA litigation, with the responding agencies often in sole possession of requested records and with information searches conducted only by agency personnel, courts have relied on the agency affidavits to determine whether the statutory obligations of FOIA have been met. Perry v. Block, 684 F.2d 121, 126 (D.C. Cir However, reliance on agency affidavits is not blind and does not require courts to accept glib government assertions of complete disclosure or retrieval. Id. Additionally, the D.C. Circuit had held that instances of countervailing evidence, inconsistency of proof, and positive indications of overlooked materials can rebut agency affidavits, as well as evidence of bad faith. Id. at (internal citations omitted. The declarations submitted by the FDA are not sufficiently detailed, particularly in light of the above-mentioned examples of countervailing evidence. None of the declarations submitted describe the search terms or the type of search performed. Rather, each declaration simply asserts that the declarant conducted a search or supervised a search. See May 2, 2007 Declaration of Lisa C. Granger at 10 (no search terms or detail of system; June 12, 2007 Declaration of Lisa M. Granger at 11 (no search terms or detail of system; April 26, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mungo at 5 (no search terms; July 11, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mugno at 6 (no search terms; May 1, 2007 Declaration of Karen E. Schifter at 4 (no search terms or system; July 12, 2007 Declaration of Karen E. Schifter at 5 (no search terms or system; Declaration of Carol H. Crim at 4 (no search terms or system; and Declaration of Kelly Palmer at 5 (no search terms or system. Ms. Granger s Declarations state that she searched the Office of Legislation tracking system, but neither declaration described what the OL tracking system is or how it operates. See May 2, 2007 Declaration of Lisa C. Granger at 10; June 12, 2007 Declaration of Lisa M. 6
7 Granger at 11; April 26, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mungo at 5; July 11, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mugno at 6. Similarly, Mr. Mungo s declarations state that she searched the Office of Secretariat s Agency Information Management System ( AIMS but never describes the AIMS system or how it operates. The other declarations fail to identify in any way, what system was used in the searches. Also missing from the FDA s affidavits is any description of how the search was actually conducted, including what each declarant found as a result of the search. The FDA does make clear that Ms. Granger coordinates the production, but none of the declaration state what records were actually found as a result of their nondescript search. 2 See April 26, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mungo at 5 (made the responsive documents available to the Office of Legislation; July 11, 2007 Declaration of Indya Mugno at 7 (forwarded responsive documents to the Office of Legislation; May 1, 2007 Declaration of Karen E. Schifter at 5 (produced non-duplicative documents to the Office of Legislation; July 12, 2007 Declaration of Karen E. Schifter at 6 (produced non-duplicative documents to the Office of Legislation; Declaration of Carol H. Crim at 4 (produced responsive records; and Declaration of Kelly Palmer at 5 (forwarded responsive documents to the Office of Legislation. The D.C. Circuit held that an affidavit that does not show, with reasonable detail, that the search method was reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents does not satisfy the FOIA burden. Oglesby, 920 F.2d at 68. Similarly, an affidavit that fails to identify the terms 2 Ms. Crim does state that the records she produced reflected the dates of meetings between the Commissioner and Senator Clinton. Crim Decl. at 4. Judicial Watch assumes these records consist of the s and reminders of appointments. However, a sufficiently detailed declaration should not require assumptions on the part of the Court or the requestor. 7
8 searched or explain how the search was conducted does not satisfy the FOIA burden. Id. The FDA s declarations have clearly not met FOIA s burden for sufficiently detailed. As the D.C. Circuit held: If the agency can lightly void its responsibilities by laxity in identification or retrieval of desired materials, the majestic goals of the [FOIA] Act will soon pass beyond reach. And if, in the fact of well-defined requests and positive indications of overlooked materials, an agency can so easily avoid adversary scrutiny of its search techniques, the Act will inevitably become nugatory. Founding Church, 610 F.2d at 837. III. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the FDA s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment should be denied. July 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted, JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. /s/ Meredith L. Di Liberto D.C. Bar No Paul J. Orfanedes D.C. Bar No Suite School Street, S.W. Washington, DC ( Attorneys for Plaintiff 8
9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No (RCL U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Defendant. PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE DISPUTE Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. ( Judicial Watch, by counsel and pursuant to LcvR 56.1, submits the following response to Defendant U.S. Food and Drug Administration s ( FDA Statement of Material Facts as to Which There is No Genuine Issue: 1. Undisputed. 2. Undisputed. 3. Undisputed that the FDA sent Judicial Watch records responsive to the Clinton FOIA request. Deny any implication that it was a full production. 4. Undisputed. 5. Undisputed. 6. Dispute that the FDA has produced all records responsive to the Enzi and Murray FOIA requests. 7. Dispute as to the thoroughness of the searches performed by the FDA. 8. Dispute. 1
10 9. Dispute. 10. Dispute. Judicial Watch respectfully submits the following statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue: 1. The FDA failed to comply with the statutory deadlines imposed by FOIA on each of the FOIA requests sent by Judicial Watch. 2. The FDA waited almost eight months to produce records responsive to the Clinton FOIA request. 3. Despite ongoing litigation, the FDA waited almost three months to produce records responsive to the Enzi and Murray FOIA requests. July 30, 2007 Respectfully submitted, JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. /s/ Meredith L. Di Liberto D.C. Bar No Paul J. Orfanedes D.C. Bar No Suite School Street, S.W. Washington, DC ( Attorneys for Plaintiff 2
Case 1:15-cv APM Document 48 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00692-APM Document 48 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-00692 (APM) ) U.S.
More informationCase 1:15-cv NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-cv-11583-NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
More informationCase 1:17-cv JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01167-JEB Document 41 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1167-JEB FEDERAL
More informationCase 1:12-cv EGS Document 11 Filed 09/28/12 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00850-EGS Document 11 Filed 09/28/12 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAUSE OF ACTION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 12 CV-00850 (EGS) ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
More informationCase 1:13-cv ELH Document 28-1 Filed 01/30/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:13-cv-01878-ELH Document 28-1 Filed 01/30/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ORLY TAITZ, : Plaintiff, : v. : Civil No. ELH-13-1878 CAROLYN COLVIN, :
More informationCase 1:16-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00461-ABJ Document 19 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:16-CV-461 (ABJ UNITED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRANT F. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-01431 (TSC CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Grant F. Smith, proceeding
More informationCase 1:15-cv CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPINION AND ORDER
Case 1:15-cv-02088-CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-2088 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
More informationCase 1:08-cv RMC Document 13 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cv-01151-RMC Document 13 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SOPHIA HELENA IN T VELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1151
More informationCase 1:14-cv RCL Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01242-RCL Document 19 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-cv-1242 (RCL) U.S.
More informationCase 1:17-cv CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:17-cv-01928-CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADAM JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17 Civ. 1928 (CM) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
More informationUSCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 53 [ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] No
USCA Case #17-5042 Document #1691255 Filed: 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 53 [ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] No. 17-5042 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE
More informationCase 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00144-APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES MADISON PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:17-cv-00144-APM DEPARTMENT OF
More informationCase 1:12-cv BAH Document 9 Filed 08/09/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00919-BAH Document 9 Filed 08/09/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-919 (BAH)
More informationCase 1:12-cv ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00327-ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 07-00403 (TFH) ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT S
More informationRE: Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA Case 58987)
November 24, 2009 BY CERTIFIED MAIL NSA/CSS FOIA Appeal Authority (DJP4) National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road STE 6248 Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6248 RE: Freedom of Information Act Appeal (FOIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-360 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF DEFENSE, et al., ) ) Defendants.
More informationNO. 3:10cv1953 (MRK) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CON- NECTICUT U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45292
Page 1 SERVICE WOMEN'S ACTION NETWORK, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBER- TIES UNION, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF CON- NECTICUT, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DE- PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00785 Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 ) Washington, DC 20024,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 6, 2015 Decided January 21, 2016 No. 14-5230 JEFFERSON MORLEY, APPELLANT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, APPELLEE Appeal
More informationCase 1:11-cv CKK Document 24 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01072-CKK Document 24 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION v.
More informationCase 1:06-cv RBW Document 10-3 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 6. Exhibit B
Case 1:06-cv-01773-RBW Document 10-3 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 6 Exhibit B Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice, Civ. No. 06-1773-RBW Motion for Preliminary Injunction Case 1:06-cv-01773-RBW
More informationCase 1:13-cv PLF Document 21 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01758-PLF Document 21 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JAYSHAWN DOUGLAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1758 (PLF) ) DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:11-cv JDB Document 12 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-02261-JDB Document 12 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION 1331 G Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:98-cv TPJ Document 40 Filed 03/05/02 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. C.A.
Case 1:98-cv-02737-TPJ Document 40 Filed 03/05/02 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT, Plaintiff, v. C.A. 98-2737 NA TIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
More informationCase 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 3:06-cv-01431-DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOWARD A. MICHEL, -vs- AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
More informationFebruary 20, RE: In Support of Fee Wavier for Freedom of Information Act Request Number: (FP )
Tulane Environmental Law Clinic Via Email: delene.r.smith@usace.army.mil Attn: Delene R. Smith Department of the Army Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300
More informationCase 1:10-cv SAS Document 189 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 27
Case 1:10-cv-03488-SAS Document 189 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK; CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; and
More informationFOIA PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FOIA PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests that we reviewed appeared to be processed generally in compliance with the FOIA. Some areas needed improvement, as discussed
More informationCase 1:11-cv JDB Document 12-2 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-02261-JDB Document 12-2 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION ) CENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 13, 2017 Decided December 15, 2017 No. 17-5042 REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND ASSOCIATED PRESS, APPELLANTS
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00545 Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER 1718 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 200
More informationCase 1:13-cv EGS Document 48 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01363-EGS Document 48 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-1363 (EGS)
More informationCase4:13-cv DMR Document38 Filed12/08/14 Page1 of 21
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed/0/ Page of 0 MELINDA HAAG (CABN United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN Chief, Civil Division JENNIFER S WANG (CSBN Assistant United States Attorney 0 Golden Gate Avenue,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION DEBBIE SOUTHORN and ERIN GLASCO, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR OF ) THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ) ) Defendant.
More informationCase 1:17-cv BAH Document 25 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00652-BAH Document 25 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.
More informationSaman Khoury v. Secretary United States Army
2017 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-27-2017 Saman Khoury v. Secretary United States Army Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2017
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GWENDOLYN DEVORE, ) on behalf A.M., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0061 (ABJ/AK) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 1:10-cv RBW Document 11 Filed 11/02/10 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00851-RBW Document 11 Filed 11/02/10 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) 501 School Street, S.W., Suite 700 ) Washington, DC 20024
More informationCase 1:13-cv PEC Document 51 Filed 11/26/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:13-cv-00834-PEC Document 51 Filed 11/26/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS DONALD MARTIN, JR., et al., : : Plaintiffs, : v. : Civil Action No.: 13-834C : Judge Patricia
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D.B., APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION
More informationCase 1:06-cv HHK Document 48 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:06-cv-00096-HHK Document 48 Filed 09/05/2007 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, v. Plaintiff, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil
More informationCase 1:15-cv RC Document 41-1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00802-RC Document 41-1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FERRING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA M. BURWELL, et al.,
More informationSchaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corporation Inc.
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2014-2015 Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corporation Inc. Lindsey M. West University of Montana School of Law, mslindseywest@gmail.com
More informationCase 1:15-mc ESH Document 14 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-mc-00410-ESH Document 14 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CBS BROADCASTING INC., Misc.
More informationEPIC seeks documents related to the FBI s use of drones, also known as unmanned aircraft systems ( UAS ).
BY EMAIL Email: foiparequest@ic.fbi.gov September 9, 2016 David M. Hardy Chief, Record/Information Dissemination Section Records Management Division Federal Bureau of Investigation 170 Marcel Drive Winchester,
More informationU.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT 1. Name, title, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted with questions
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Civil Action Nos. 17-1167, 17-1175, 17-1189, 17-1212, 17-1830 (JEB) Defendant.
More informationRe: Freedom of Information Act Request Regarding Targeted Violence Prevention Program
July 12, 2018 VIA EMAIL FOIA/PA The Privacy Office U.S. Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Drive SW STOP-0655 Washington, D.C. 20528-0655 foia@hq.dhs.gov Re: Freedom of Information Act Request
More informationI write to appeal the Department s erroneous denial of the above-referenced Freedom of Information Act request.
March 7, 2011 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL Ms. Melanie Pustay Director, Office of Information and Privacy U.S. Department of Justice Flag Building, Suite 570 Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Appeal
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- Alenia North America, Inc. Under Contract No. FA8504-08-C-0007 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 57935 Louis D. Victorino, Esq. Sheppard Mullin
More informationCase 1:10-cv RMU Document 18 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-02119-RMU Document 18 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTHONY SHAFFER, v. Plaintiff, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase 1:16-cv RC Document 18 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
Case 1:16-cv-02410-RC Document 18 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DYLAN TOKAR, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 16-2410 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.:
More information[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED]
USCA Case #11-5320 Document #1374831 Filed: 05/21/2012 Page 1 of 59 [ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] No. 11-5320 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AMERICAN CIVIL
More informationRECENT COURT DECISIONS INVOLVING FQHC PAYMENTS AND METHODOLOGY
ISSUE BRIEF Medicare/Medicaid Technical Assistance #92: RECENT COURT DECISIONS INVOLVING FQHC PAYMENTS AND METHODOLOGY January 2008 Prepared by: Benjamin Cohen, Esq. National Association of Community Health
More informationCase 1:16-cv BAH Document 26 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
Case 1:16-cv-00175-BAH Document 26 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiff, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, RANDY C. HUFFMAN, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, GORMAN COMPANY, LLC, KYCOGA COMPANY, LLC, BLACK GOLD SALES, INC., KENTUCKY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ) ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.: 17-0652-BAH ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION
More informationCase 1:17-cv CKK Document 73 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 73 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationCase 1:16-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00486-JEB Document 13 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) REPUBLICAN NATIONAL ) COMMITTEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:16-CV-00486-JEB
More informationCase 1:17-cv CRC Document 8 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-01669-CRC Document 8 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES Secret Service, Defendant.
More informationFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation legal Division Closing Manual
Description of document: Appeal date: Released date: Posted date: Title of document Source of document: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Legal Division [Case] Closing Manual - Table of Contents
More informationFebruary 13, 2018 VIA ONLINE PORTAL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
February 13, 2018 VIA ONLINE PORTAL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Laurie Day Chief, Initial Request Staff Office of Information Policy Department of Justice, Suite 11050 1425 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC
More informationAugust 30, Dear FOIA Officers:
August 30, 2017 VIA ONLINE PORTAL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Laurie Day Chief, Initial Request Staff Office of Information Policy U.S. Department of Justice 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington, DC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RYAN SHAPIRO, et al. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, v. Civil Action No. 12-1883 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 1:14-cv S-PAS Document 59 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 617 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:14-cv-00353-S-PAS Document 59 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 617 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) STEPHEN FRIEDRICH, individually ) and as Executor of the Estate
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,
Case: 11-55754 12/21/2011 ID: 8008826 DktEntry: 20 Page: 1 of 63 No. 11-55754 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, v. Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationCase 5:13-cv WTH-PRL Document 10-1 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 51
Case 5:13-cv-00420-WTH-PRL Document 10-1 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 51 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION FREEDOM WATCH, INC. v. Plaintiff, DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 1:09-cv RBW Document 14 Filed 09/28/2009 Page 1 of 43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:09-cv-00935-RBW Document 14 Filed 09/28/2009 Page 1 of 43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE ) COUNCIL, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 09-0935 (RBW)
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 09-1163 In the Supreme Court of the United States GLEN SCOTT MILNER, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals for
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 5370.7C NAVINSGEN SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5370.7C From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWER
More informationCase 1:13-cv AT Document 42-1 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 116 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case 1:13-cv-09198-AT Document 42-1 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 116 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNION, and, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
More informationIllinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel P.O. Box 7288, Springfield, IL IDC Quarterly Vol. 14, No. 2 ( ) Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice By: Edward J. Aucoin, Jr. Hall, Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC Chicago The Future of Expert Physician Testimony on Nursing Standard of Care When the Illinois Supreme Court announced in June
More informationStateside Legal Letter Packet Letter from Servicemember Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Protections under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act)
Stateside Legal Letter Packet Letter from Servicemember Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Protections under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act This self-help resource was created by the Stateside Legal
More informationCase 1:10-cv RWR Document 19 Filed 11/03/10 Page 1 of 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00883-RWR Document 19 Filed 11/03/10 Page 1 of 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10 CV 0883
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 19, 2018 Decided July 9, 2018 No. 17-5114 JEFFERSON MORLEY, APPELLANT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, APPELLEE Appeal from
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION NO.
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION NO. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Office of Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Plaintiff/Appellant v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky Defendant/Appellee
More informationCASE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jan 13 2016 11:43:24 2015-CA-00973 Pages: 14 CASE NO. 2015-CA-00973 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM HENSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF BONITA G. HENSON AND
More information10 Government Contracting Trends To Watch This Year
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 10 Government Contracting Trends To Watch
More informationCase 1:17-cv PGG Document 30 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:17-cv-07520-PGG Document 30 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, - against - Plaintiff,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2007-080 FINAL DECISION
More informationCase 1:15-cv AKH Document 70 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case 1:15-cv-09317-AKH Document 70 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and the AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BCMR Docket No. 2008-087 FINAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman. Defendant. /
2:14-cv-10644-MFL-RSW Doc # 58 Filed 09/22/15 Pg 1 of 25 Pg ID 983 GERALDINE WENGLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-10644 Hon.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant.
1 1 1 1 1 1 MICHAEL A. RAMOS District Attorney BRITT P. IMES Supervising Deputy District Attorney SEAN W. DAUGHERTY Deputy District Attorney 1 N. Mountain View Ave. San Bernardino, CA 1 Telephone: (0-00
More informationAddress: 62 Britton Street, London, EC1M 5UY, Great Britain Phone: +44 (0) Website:
Address: 62 Britton Street, London, EC1M 5UY, Great Britain Phone: +44 (0) 20 3422 4321 Website: www.privacyinternational.org December 13, 2016 VIA FACSIMILE AND POST National Security Agency ATTN: FOIA
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEB Document 23 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-00890-JEB Document 23 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) ) Civil Action No. Plaintiff, ) 1:11-cv-00890-JEB
More informationStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2017-2018 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Oliver Wood Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for Correction of Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. 2002-094 FINAL DECISION Ulmer, Chair: This is a proceeding
More informationCOMBINED OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 1:12-cv-00794-CM Document 38 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ x THE NEW YORK TIMES
More informationCase 1:17-cv PAE Document 36 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE
Case 1:17-cv-03391-PAE Document 36 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, v.
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00079-CV Doctors Data, Inc., Appellant v. Ronald Stemp and Carrie Stemp, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationNidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No Curtis Witters, on Behalf of Themselves and Their RJI No.: ST8123 Children,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: THIRD DEPARTMENT In the Matter of an Article 78 Proceeding Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No. 5102-16 Curtis Witters, on
More informationU.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 In the Matter of: ADMINISTRATOR, ARB CASE NO. 03-091 WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
More informationalways legally required to follow the privacy practices described in this Notice.
The ANXIETY & STRESS MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE 1640 Powers Ferry Rd, Building 9, Suite 10 0, Marietta, Georgia 30067, 770-953-0080 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) NOTICE OF PRIVACY
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. NAJI JAWDAT HAMDAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Case: 13-55172 12/17/2013 ID: 8904863 DktEntry: 18-1 Page: 1 of 70 No. 13-55172 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NAJI JAWDAT HAMDAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED
More informationCase 1:05-cv CKK Document 262 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cv-00764-CKK Document 262 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ABDULLATIF NASSER, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit JOHN M. MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellant v. KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Appellee 2015-1053
More information