NELAP ACCREDITATION BODY. REPORT of ON-SITE EVALUATION. According to the 2009 TNI Standard
|
|
- Irma Thornton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NELAP ACCREDITATION BODY REPORT of ON-SITE EVALUATION According to the 2009 TNI Standard California State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Richmond, CA March
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Team Composition...3 Members of California ELAP...3 Dates of On-Site Evaluation...4 Background...5 Findings...6 Summary...11 Attachment 1: Observation of On-site Laboratory Assessment...12 Attachment 2: Fields of Accreditation
3 A. Evaluation Team (ET) Composition, Kristin Brown. Lead Evaluator Utah Department of Health Bureau of Laboratory Improvement 4431 South 2700 West Taylorsville, UT (801) Jack Berges, Evaluator US EPA Region 9 Laboratory 1337 S. 46th St. Bldg 201 Richmond, CA (510) The NELAP Quality Assurance Officer (QAO), Paul Ellingson, AQS, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, employed by the NELAP Board of The NELAC Institute (TNI) accompanied the ET, but did not directly participate in the Evaluation Team s on-site program evaluation. The QAO was present to help assure uniformity of the AB evaluation procedures consistent with the NELAC standards. B. CA ELAP Personnel (Northern California): David Mazzera, Assistant Division Chief Fred Choske, Supervising Chemist Aida Dente, Supervising Chemist Jane Jensen, Staff Chemist Steven Bogs, Staff Environmental Scientist Frank Riley, Staff Environmental Scientist Joseph Ondo, Staff Chemist Wayne Tseng, Chemist Ronald Mills, Staff Chemist Nelia Beaman, Staff Chemist Linda Louie, Staff Chemist Mandy Mok, Chemist 3
4 Dharmendra Rishi, Chemist Karen Lee, Chemist C. Dates of On-Site Evaluation: The on-site program review of the CA ELAP was performed on May 2-3, The observation of the CA assessors performing a NELAP laboratory assessment was performed on May 1, 2012 of Kiff Analytical, nd Street, Davis, CA Background: The California State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (CA ELAP) currently issues primary accreditation to 35 laboratories. In 2012 CA ELAP s NELAP recognition was renewed following satisfactory completion of a comprehensive evaluation of the CA ELAP s program. The following NELAC Standards applied to the 2012 evaluation: June 2003 (Constitution and Bylaws; Program, Policy, and Structure; Proficiency Testing; Accrediting Authority) and May 2001 (On-site Assessment; Accreditation Process; Quality System). The June 2003 version of the NELAC Standards extended the interval between evaluations to three years. Additionally, NELAP gave accreditation bodies due for renewal a one-year extension, due to the shift of the NELAP program from EPA to the NELAC Institute (TNI). Renewals which include on-site evaluations and laboratory assessment observations are required every three years. This evaluation is conducted under the 2009 TNI Environmental Laboratory Sector Standard, adopted by the NELAP Accreditation Council (AC) to become effective July 1, While not all ABs have been able to adopt the Volume 1 laboratory standards, all ABs are expected to modify their operations (where not codified in regulatory or legislative language) to comply with Volume 2, effective that date. In October 2011, CA ELAP submitted its renewal application along with required documentation, including its regulations, rules and standard operating procedures, and the NELAP checklists. This documentation was reviewed for completeness October 31, 2011 and the application was accepted on November 28, The completed application technical review report was sent to CA ELAP on April 27, Due to the short turn around time between the technical review and the program onsite evaluation the CA ELAP was informed that issues found during the technical review would be reviewed during the program onsite evaluation. The CA ELAP has requested that the following areas of accreditation be maintained: Drinking water, Non-Potable Water, Solid and Chemical Materials, 4
5 Please refer to Attachment 1 for a complete listing of all fields of accreditation for which recognition is being sought. Evaluation Process: This evaluation was conducted according to the following standards and procedures: 2009 NELAP Standard, available at administered by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) Accreditation Council (AC) operating within The NELAC Institute ( Standard Operating Procedure For the Evaluation of Accreditation Bodies, Revision 3. Checklist to Determine Accrediting Body Compliance, for the 2009 TNI Standards. The evaluation team reviewed the following materials: renewal application; NELAP completeness checklist; NELAP Technical Review Checklist; statutes authorizing CA ELAP; standard operating procedures comprising the CA ELAP quality system; various CA ELAP applications and checklists; laboratory assessment schedules and program reviews; and the complete program files, covering the period since the last NELAP renewal, for Babcock and Sons, Accutest Laboratories Northern California, Columbia Analytical Services Simi Valley, University of Iowa-Hygenic Lab, Accutest Laboratories SE, Pace Analytical PA, and Midwest Laboratories. During the on-site evaluation, the team: interviewed both CA ELAP assessors and the program s supervisor, Fred Choske. received a detailed description of the steps a laboratory must take to become accredited, including the materials each prospective applicant receives; reviewed the program s system for tracking proficiency testing (PT) data and adjusting its laboratories accreditation; and discussed its findings from the technical review and on-site evaluation with the CA ELAP assessors and their supervisor. The team also observed a CA ELAP laboratory assessment; the report of this observation is attached. 5
6 Findings: Each finding includes a citation of the relevant section of the 2009 NELAP Standard and/or the CA ELAP Quality Manual. In addition we have provided a recommended corrective action which CA ELAP may consider during the development of its corrective action response. 1. Finding: During the onsite evaluation the accreditation body did not have a member of management with the responsibility and authority including reporting to top management on the performance of the management system and any need for improvement. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.2.3(b): The accreditation body's top management shall appoint a member of management who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have responsibility and authority that includes reporting to top management on the performance of the management system and any need for improvement. Discussion/Rationale: The California State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Branch s Chief George Kulasingam had recently retired at the time of the onsite assessment. Roles and responsibilities within the branch were not clearly defined at the time of the assessment. Recommended Corrective Action: The accreditation body needs to assign a Branch Chief or equivalent to the program. The roles and responsibilities of management need to be clearly defined. 2. Finding: The laboratory needs to develop a corrective action procedure that eliminates the causes of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.5: The accreditation body shall also, where necessary, take actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the impact of the problems encountered. Discussion/Rationale: During the onsite evaluation the QAO was interviewed and stated that there have been several problems noted during internal audits that have been reoccurring problems for several years. Recommended Corrective Action: The accreditation body needs to take appropriate action to ensure that problems are eliminated and do not reoccur. 3a. Finding: Several of the CA ELAP documents reviewed during the evaluation had been updated recently. At the time of the evaluation the staff of the CA ELAP were not aware of these changes. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.2.2: The accreditation body shall ensure that the manual and relevant associated documents are accessible to its personnel and shall ensure effective implementation of the system s procedure. 3b. Finding: The program Quality Manual had been updated on November 1, At the time of the evaluation the only staff member who had read the update was the QAO. 6
7 Citation(s): V2, M3, 4.2.7: The accreditation body shall ensure that assessors and, where relevant, experts: (a) are familiar with accreditation procedures, accreditation criteria and other relevant requirements. Discussion/Rationale: During the interviews with the staff of the ELAP it was learned that the staff was unaware of recent updates to CA ELAP documents. Recommended Corrective Action: The Quality Manual and documents related must be accessible to personnel. The accreditation body shall take steps to ensure that the assessors are familiar with accreditation procedures, accreditation criteria and other relevant requirements. 4. Finding: The internal audit does not show that the program conforms to the requirements of the standard, and that the system is implemented and maintained. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.7.1: The accreditation body shall establish procedures for internal audits to verify that they conform to the requirements of this Standard and that the management system is implemented and maintained. NOTE: As an indication, ISO provides guidelines for conducting internal audits. Discussion/Rationale: The internal audit available for review during the evaluation process did not show that the program conforms to the standard. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP internal audits must document that the program conforms to the requirements of the standard, and that the system is implemented and maintained 5. Finding: The program did not have a managerial review available for the team to review at the time of the evaluation. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.8.1: The accreditation body's top management shall establish procedures to review its management system at planned intervals to ensure its continuing adequacy and effectiveness in satisfying the relevant requirements, including this Standard and the stated policies and objectives. These reviews should be conducted normally at least once a year. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP shall conduct a review normally once a year to establish procedures to review its management system at planned intervals to ensure its continuing adequacy and effectiveness in satisfying the relevant requirements, including this Standard and the stated policies and objectives. 5. Finding: The documentation of complaints received by the CA ELAP were incomplete. The documentation did not include the validity of the complaint and the actions taken. Citation(s): V2, M1, 5.9(a); V2, M1, 5.9(c): In established procedures for dealing with complaints, the accreditation body shall decide on the validity of the complaint. In established procedures for dealing with complaints, the accreditation body shall take appropriate actions and assess their effectiveness. 7
8 Discussion/Rationale: Documentation available on complaints received at CA ELAP was sparse with little information. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP needs to review their complaint program to make sure that all employees are aware of what documentation needs to be maintained when a complaint is received. 6a. Finding: During interviews with CA ELAP staff, one staff member of CA ELAP did not show a knowledge of the ability to conduct a successful assessment. Citation(s): V2, M1, 6.1.1: The accreditation body shall have a sufficient number of competent personnel (internal, external, temporary, or permanent, full time or part time) having the education, training, technical knowledge, skills and experience necessary for handling the type, range and volume of work performed. Discussion/Rationale: Several questions were asked to staff members on how to prepare for an assessment and evaluate a laboratory at an assessment. There was significant concern by the team during one interview on the staff member s lack of knowledge in these areas. 6b. Finding: The CA ELAP does not have records to show that its personnel are reviewed for competency and that additional training needs are identified. Citation(s): V2, M1, 6.3.1: In particular, the accreditation body shall review the performance and competence of its personnel in order to identify training needs and V2, M1, 6.3.2: The accreditation body shall conduct monitoring (e.g., by on-site observations, or by using other techniques such as review of assessment reports, feedback from CABs and peer monitoring of assessors) to evaluate an assessor s performance and to recommend appropriate follow-up actions to improve performance. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP must evaluate their training and evaluation process to identify when additional training may be needed. 7. Finding: There is no record of signature or equivalent by the staff to commit themselves to comply with the rules as defined by the accreditation body. Citation(s): V2, M1, 6.1.4: The accreditation body shall require all personnel to commit themselves formally by a signature or equivalent to comply with the rules defined by the accreditation body. Recommended Corrective Action: CA ELAP should develop a procedure to obtain and document the staff commitment to comply with their AB rules as defined. 8. Finding: The records for CA ELAP staff that he is approved to assess both microbiology and chemistry, however records show he has only successfully passed training in Organic Chemistry. 8
9 Citation(s): V2, M1, 6.2.4(b): The accreditation body shall ensure that assessors and, where relevant, experts have undergone a relevant accreditation assessor training. Recommended Corrective Action: Accurate records of training must be kept for all CA ELAP staff. These records must show successful training for all relevant accreditation fields. 9. Finding: The CA ELAP shall observe each assessor on-site regularly, normally every three years, unless there is sufficient supporting evidence that the assessor is continuing to perform competently. Citation(s): V2, M1, 6.3.2: Each assessor shall be observed on-site regularly, normally every three years, unless there is sufficient supporting evidence that the assessor is continuing to perform competently. Discussion/Rationale: This standard is new to the 2009 TNI Standard. Recommended Corrective Action: A process needs to be established to observe each assessor on-site regularly, normally every three years, unless there is sufficient supporting evidence that the assessor is continuing to perform competently. 10. Finding: Review of records maintained by the CA ELAP showed that Test America Sacramento exceeded a 2 and ½ year interval between assessments. Citation(s): V2, M1, 7.7.3: Accreditation bodies shall rely on either reassessment alone or a combination of reassessment and surveillance, as follows: (a) if based on reassessment alone, then the reassessment shall take place at intervals not exceeding 2 years; or (b) if the combination of reassessment and surveillance is relied upon, then the accreditation body shall undertake a reassessment at least every 5 years. However, the interval between the surveillance on-site assessments should not exceed 2 years.it is, however, recommended that the first surveillance on-site assessment be carried out no later than 12 months from the date of initial accreditation. and V2, M3, 5.1: After an initial assessment for accreditation, accreditation bodies shall perform reassessments at intervals of two years plus or minus six months. Once a CAB (i.e., environmental laboratory) is accredited, accreditation bodies reserve the right to assess a CAB at any time during the accreditation period. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP needs to make sure that assessments do not exceed the 2 ½ year time between assessments. 11. Finding: Records reviewed during the onsite evaluation show that several reports were not sent to the CAB within thirty calendar days of the last day of the on-site assessment. 9
10 Citation(s): V2, M3, : The accreditation body or its authorized representative shall present to the CAB within thirty calendar days of the last day of the on-site assessment a final assessment report identifying all confirmed findings. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP needs to make sure that time frames for reports are met. 12. Finding: During the evaluation of the onsite assessment the team did not ensure that PT samples were tracked, prepared, and analyzed in the same manner as routine samples. Citation(s): V2, M2, 6.1: The Primary AB shall assess the laboratory to ensure that PT samples are tracked, prepared, and analyzed in the same manner as routine samples. Discussion/Rationale: During the laboratory shadow of the assessment process the assessment team did not verify that PT samples are being handled like routine samples. Recommended Corrective Action: The assessment team during the process of a laboratory assessment needs to verify that PT samples are being handled like routine samples. 13. Finding: Records of assessor qualification statements were not available during the program evaluation. Citation(s): V2, M3, 4.3.2: Assessors shall sign qualification statements attesting the assessors meet the education and training required by this Standard. Accreditation bodies shall provide those statements to CABs (i.e., environmental laboratories) upon request. Recommended Corrective Action: The CA ELAP shall maintain signed qualification statements attesting the assessors meet the education and training required by this Standard. Accreditation bodies shall provide those statements to CABs (i.e., environmental laboratories) upon request. Observations : Observations are written when there is insufficient evidence to clearly write a finding or failure to follow the standard. These will not carry forward into the final recommendation to the Board. 1. Observation: During the program evaluation concerns about the laboratory s financial resources and budget were expressed. Citation (to standard): V2, M1, 4.5.2: The accreditation body shall have the financial resources, demonstrated by records and/or documents, required for the operation of its activities. The accreditation body shall have a description of its source(s) of income. Discussion/Rationale (if desired): With current state budget concerns and fee increases to the program it was unclear if the CA ELAP was financially stable. Recommended Corrective Action: The accreditation body shall have a description of its source(s) of income and resources to maintain the accreditation program. 10
11 2. Observation: Significant concern was expressed over the programs management system and if it was being implemented successfully in accordance with the Standard. Citation (to standard): V2, M1, 5.1.1: The accreditation body shall establish, implement and maintain a management system and continually improve its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard. Requirements for the management system that take into account the particular nature of accreditation bodies are defined in 5.2 to 5.9. Discussion/Rationale (if desired): After the departure of George Kulasingam records show that the management systems was not being maintain and continually improved. There was little or no communication between the QAO and staff members about updates to program related documents or concerns. Recommended Corrective Action: Clear management responsibilities must be established. All CA ELAP procedures must be available to and used by CA ELAP staff. Summary: In order to continue the evaluation process, a written plan of corrective action for the above findings must be submitted to each member of the evaluation team within 30 days of your receipt of this report. Observations need not be addressed but may be used for quality improvement. If such corrective actions have not been completed at the time of your response, please include a schedule for their completion. All corrective actions must be satisfactorily completed within 30 calendar days of the receipt of this letter. Please refer to NELAP Standard Operating Procedure 3-102, for further details regarding the requirements and deadlines for renewal of recognition. Date of Report: 02/24/13 Signature of Lead Evaluator: Kristin Brown Utah Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Certification Program Kristinbrown@utah.gov 11
12 Attachment 1 12
13 Observation of On-site Laboratory Assessment: Assessment Performed by: Laboratory Name: California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Kiff Analytical, LLC Dates of Observation: 5/1/12 Name of Observer: Kristin Brown, Jack Berges Assessors Observed: Jack Berges, Lead Assessor Karen Lee Wayne Tseng Laboratory areas assessed during this observation included: Wet Chemistry analyses, Volatile Organic Analyses by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Mercury analysis by CVAA Ion Chromatography Quality Systems Comments: 1. The CA ELAP assessors utilized in-house method checklists that cover each of the test methods that the laboratory was accredited. The assessors also relied on copies of the regulated method and knowledge to perform the assessment. 2. The opening conference content conformed with the current requirements in TNI Volume 2, Module 3, Section The conduct of the on-site assessment was representative and a proper balance was achieved. 4. The closing conference content included an oral report of the findings and conformed to the requirements in TNI Volume 2, Module 3, Section (a) and (b) of the Environmental Laboratory Sector standards. 5. Finding 12 listed in the Program Evaluation refers to issues related to the laboratory observation. 13
14 Attachment 2 14
15 Name Technology Description Drinking Water Non-Potable Water Solids and Chemical Air Tissue AMP Amperometric Titration X X AS Alpha Spectrometry X X X ASC Alpha Scintillation Cell Counter ASV Anodic Stripping Voltammetry AUTO Auto Analyzer X X BETA Beta Spectrometery BGCS Beta/Gamma Coincidence Scintillation Counter COND Conductance X X COUL Coulometric Titration X X CVAAS Atomic Absorption-Cold Vapor Spectrometry X X X CVAFS Atomic Fluorescence - Cold Vapor Spectrometry X DCP-AES Atomic Emission - Direct Current Plasma Spectrometry DPP Differential Pulse Polarography X FAAS Atomic Absorption - Flame Spectrometry X X X FAES Atomic Emission - Flame Spectrometry FLUOR Ultraviolet or Visible Molecular Fluorescence Spectrometry X X GALV Galvanic Probe GC-ECD Gas Chromatography - Electron Capture Detection X X X GC-ECD/FID Gas Chromatography - Electron Capture/Flame Ionization Detectrion X GC-ELCD Gas Chromatography - Electrolytic Conductivity Detection X X GC-ELCD/PID Gas Chromatography - Electrolytic Conductivity/Photoionization Detection X X GC-FID Gas Chromatography - Flame Ionization Detection X X GC-FPD Gas Chromatography - Flame Photometric Detection X GC-FTIR Gas Chromatography - Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry X GC-HRMS Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry - High Resolution X X X GC-MS Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry X X X GC-NPD Gas Chromatography-Nitrogen/phosphorus Detection X X X GC-PID Gas Chromatography- Photoionization Detection X X X GFAAS Atomic Absorption-Graphite Furnace Spectrometry X X X GRAV Gravimetry X X GS-HR Gamma Spectrometry-High Resolution X X X GS-LR Gamma Spectrometry- Low Resolution X X X HGAAS Atomic Absorption - Hydride Generation Spectrometry X X X HPLC-ELEC High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrochemical X HPLC-FLUOR High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ultraviolet/visible Molecular Fluorescence X X X HPLC-IR High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Infrared Molecular Absorption HPLC-PBMS High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Particle Beam HPLC-TSMS High Performance Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry-Thermospray X X X HPLC-UV High Performance Liquid Chromatography - Ultraviolet/visible Molecular Absorption X X X IC-COND Ion Chromatography Electroconductivity X X X IC-MS Ion Chromatography Mass Spectrometry IC-UV Ion Chromatography UV X X ICP-AES Atomic Emission - Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry X X X ICP-MS Mass Spectrometry - Inductively Coupled Plasma X X X ISE Ion Selective Electrode X X IMM Immunoassay
16 IMS-FA Filtration-Immunomagnetic Separation - Immunoflourescence Assay IR Infrared Spectrometry X X X LSC Liquid Scintillation Counter X X X LP Lasar Phosphorimetry NAA Neutron Activation Analysis PC Proportional Counter X X X PCM Phase Contrast Microscopy PLM Polarized Light Microscopy X POL Polarographic Probe SEM Scaning Elecron Microscopy TEM Transmission electron microscopy X X TITR Titrimetry - Visual Indicator X X TOC-FID Total Organic Carbon - Flame Ionization Detector TOC-IR Total Organic Carbon - Nondispersive Infrared Detector TURB Turbidity X X TOX Total Organic Halide UV-VIS Ultraviolet or Visible Molecular Absorption Spectrometry X X XRF X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry XRT X-Ray Transmission Spectrometry Other Other CF-QL Chromofluorogenic-Qualitative X CF-QN Chromofluorogenic-Quantitative C-QN Chromogenic/MPN-Quantitative C-QT-QN Chromogenic/Quantitray FB-LE-QL Fermentation Broth-Qualitative X FB-PAE-QL Fermentation Broth(PA)-Qualitative X FB-PAF-QL Fermentation Broth(PA)+Fluorogenic-Qualitative FB-F-QN Fermentation Broth+Fluorogenic-Quantitative FB-QN Fermentation Broth-Quantitative X X FB-A1-QN Fermentation Broth(A-1)-Quantitative X X FFIFV Filtration/FA/IMS/FA/Viability F-HPC-QN Fluorogenic(HPC)-Quantitative X F-QN Fluorogenic/MPN-Quantitative X F-QT-QN Fluorogenic/Quantitray X MF-QL Membrane Filtration-Qualitative X MF-E-QL Membrane Filtration+Fermentation Broth-Qualitative X MF-QN Membrane Filtration-Quantitative X X MF-2S-QN Membrane Filtration(2-Step)-Quantitative MF-MEI-QN Membrane Filtration(Mei)-Quantitative X MF-F-QL Membrane Filtration+Fluorogenic-Qualitative MF-F-QN Membrane Filtration+Fluorogenic-Quantitative MF-MTEC-QN Membrane Filtration(m-TEC)-Quantitative PQ-2S-QN Plaque Counts(2-Step)-Quantitative PQ-SL-QN Plaque Counts(Single Layer)-Quantitative PP-QN Pour Plate-Quantitative X X SP-QN Spread Plate-Quantitative BioTox Toxicity Testing X X
17 MF-E-QN FB-F-QL TOC-UV GC-TEA Membrane Filtration+Fermentation Broth-Quantitative Fermentation Broth+Fluorogenic-Qualitative Total Organic Carbon - UV Spectrometer Gas Chomatography - Thermal Enery Analyzer (method 8070A CF-MUG Chromogenic/Fluorogenic with 4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-glucuronide substrate X MF/Mtec Membrane Filtration and mtec agar X MF/MI Menbrane Filtration and MI medium X MF/NA+MUG Menbrane Filtration, nutient agar with 4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-glucuronide substrate X MF/EC+MUG Menbrane Filtration, EC broth with 4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-glucuronide substrate X SETA Seta Flash X PENSKY Pensky-Martin X GPC Alpha/Beta Gasflow Internal Porportional Counter X X X
AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC
AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that Adirondack Environmental Services, Inc. 314 North Pearl Street, Albany, NY 12207-1322 Laboratory ID: 100307 along with all premises from which
More informationTNI Environmental Laboratory Program- Accreditation Procedure
PJLA offers third-party accreditation services to Conformity Assessment Bodies (i.e. Testing and/or Calibration Laboratories, Reference Material Producers, Field Sampling and Measurement Organizations
More informationNational Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) Accreditation Body Evaluator Training
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) Accreditation Body Evaluator Training 1 1 Logistics Video Conference Please NO NAMES!! - ) Past experiences are to remain anonymous Agenda
More informationAgain, congratulations. If you have any questions, please contact Lauren Schnack, Laboratory Accreditation Specialist, at (703)
February 28, 2018 Laboratory ID: 101574 Robert DiRienzo ALS Environmental 960 West Levoy Dr. Salt Lake City, UT 84123-2547 Dear Mr. DiRienzo: Congratulations! The AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs
More informationAgain, congratulations. If you have any questions, please contact Drake McGregor, Laboratory Accreditation Specialist, at (703)
August 31, 2017 Laboratory ID: 100045 Ethel Patricio Liberty Mutual Insurance Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Laboratory, 71 Frankland Road Hopkinton, MA 01748 Dear Ms. Patricio: Congratulations!
More informationPOSITION DESCRIPTION
State of Michigan Civil Service Commission Capitol Commons Center, P.O. Box 30002 Lansing, MI 48909 Position Code 1. LABSCIA POSITIO DESCRIPTIO This position description serves as the official classification
More informationDirector, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC. A&B Environmental Services, Inc.
acknowledges that A&B Environmental Services, Inc. 10100 East Freeway, Suite100, Houston, TX 77029 Laboratory ID: 101470 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above,
More informationAgain, congratulations. If you have any questions, please contact Lauren Schnack, Senior Specialist, Quality and Accreditation, at (703)
April 28, 2017 Laboratory ID: 100127 James Kenny ESIS Environmental Health Laboratory 100 Sebethe Drive Suite A-5 Cromwell, CT 06416 Dear Mr. Kenny: Congratulations! The AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 940
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 940 Introduced by Assembly Member Ridley-Thomas February 26, 2015 An act to amend Sections 1209, 1260, 1261.5, 1264, and 1300 of the Business
More informationSUPERVISOR: Paul Woodward. RESEARCH FOCUS: Chemical analysis. TITLE: Groundswell Laboratories Internship Scheme
TITLE: Groundswell Laboratories Internship Scheme INSTITUTION: Groundswell Laboratories, 116 Morey Street, South Melbourne VIC 3205 SUPERVISOR: Paul Woodward RESEARCH FOCUS: Chemical analysis RESEARCH
More informationWhat s New at ORELAP and TNI?
What s New at ORELAP and TNI? By Gary K. Ward OELA Annual Environmental Laboratory Workshop May 21, 2015 Gary Ward ORELAP Administrator - June 1, 2011 Background BS Chemistry, Loyola ; MS & PhD studies
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories Document Number: 150-2302-005 Title: Procedures for the Approval and Accreditation of Drinking Water Laboratories In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
More informationCAP Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation Program Standards for Accreditation
CAP Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation Program Standards for Accreditation Preamble Forensic drug testing is a laboratory specialty concerned with the testing of urine, oral fluid, hair, and other specimens
More informationEvaluation of Milk Laboratories
Evaluation of Milk Laboratories 2011 Revision U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration and the National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments PREFACE
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories Document Number: 150-2302-006 Title: Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Manual for Laboratories Seeking Accreditation under the Pennsylvania
More informationNABET Criteria for Food Hygiene (GMP/GHP) Awareness Training Course
NABET Criteria for Food Hygiene (GMP/GHP) Awareness Training Course 0 Section 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Food Hygiene training course shall provide training in the basic concepts of GMP/GHP as per Codex Guidelines
More informationFIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATION SECTOR VOLUME 2
FSMO-V2- -20072012 FIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATION SECTOR VOLUME 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES ACCREDITING FIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATIONS TNI StandardTNI Voting
More informationStandards for Laboratory Accreditation
Standards for Laboratory Accreditation 2017 Edition cap.org 2017 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved. [ T y p e t h e c o m p a n y a d d r e s s ] CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program
More informationPromoting Data Integrity for the Department of Defense
Promoting Data Integrity for the Department of Defense Presented to: DoD Environmental Monitoring and Data Quality Workshop 2011 Edward (Ed) Hartzog Director, Navy Laboratory Quality & Accreditation Office
More informationIAF Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Guide 61:1996
IAF Guidance Document IAF Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Guide 61:1996 General Requirements for Assessment and Accreditation of Certification/Registration Bodies Issue 3, Version 3 (IAF GD 1:2003)
More informationSpecific Accreditation Criteria Human Pathology. NATA/RCPA accreditation surveillance model for Human Pathology
Specific Accreditation Criteria Human Pathology NATA/RCPA accreditation surveillance model for Human Pathology January 2018 Copyright National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia 2014 This publication
More informationSt Brendan s College RTO 30349
160519 RTO policy and procedures Complaints and appeals Policy statement A complaint can be made to the school RTO regarding the conduct of: the school RTO, its trainers, assessors or other school RTO
More informationAccreditation Procedure
PJLA offers third-party accreditation services to Conformity Assessment Bodies (i.e. Testing and/or Calibration Laboratories, Reference Material Producers, Field Sampling and Measurement Organizations
More informationDOD MANUAL DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP)
DOD MANUAL 4715.25 DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: April
More informationNIOSH 582 Equivalency Course Requirements for Listing Effective Date: September 23, 2016
NIOSH 582 Equivalency Course Requirements for Listing Effective Date: September 23, 2016 AIHA Registry Programs 3141 Fairview Park Drive Suite 777 Falls Church VA 22042 Main Phone: (703) 846-0755 Fax:
More informationCrosswalk of Regulations And Guidance Affecting Laboratories Sorted by QSE. May 2017
Crosswalk of Regulations And Guidance Affecting Laboratories Sorted by QSE May 2017 Introduction This crosswalk of regulatory references is arranged by Quality System Essentials (QSEs), the fundamental
More informationFIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATION SECTOR VOLUME 2
FSMO-V2-20072012- Rev0.11.0 FIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATION SECTOR VOLUME 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES ACCREDITING FIELD SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ORGANIZATIONS TNI StandardWorking
More informationPost Graduate Level of Residents Involved PGY levels 3-5 and satisfactorily completed the 4-month Clinical Chemistry rotation
Advanced Toxicology at Hennepin County Medical Center This advanced rotation will provide the resident with additional intensive training in clinical and forensic toxicology. The rotation will cover the
More informationEA Cross Border Accreditation. Policy and Procedure for. Cross Border Cooperation. Between EA Members
Publication Reference EA-2/13 M: 2012 EA Cross Border Accreditation Policy and Procedure for Cross Border Cooperation Between PURPOSE This document states the policy and procedures agreed by EA members
More informationGuarding America...Defending Freedom
Civil Support Team Weapons of Mass Destruction Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Smiley J3 Department Joint Forces Headquarters, California Military Department Unclassified Civil Support Team (WMD) Presidential
More informationDepartment of Defense Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing November 2007
Department of Defense Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing November 2007 This document will be maintained and routinely updated on the Defense Procurement
More informationIAF MLA Document. Policies and Procedures for a MLA on the Level of Single Accreditation Bodies and on the Level of Regional Accreditation Groups
IAF MLA Document Level of Single Accreditation Bodies and on the Level of Regional Accreditation Groups (IAF ML 4:2016) Issued: 11 May 2016 Application Date: 11 May 2016 IAF ML 4:2016, Page 2 of 23 The
More informationApplicable Standards and Improvement Efforts. Preconference Workshop June 1, State Hygienic Laboratory, University of Iowa b
Let s Go,! Applicable Standards and Improvement Efforts Pam Kostle a, Lorelei Kurimski a, Nancy Grove a, Kristine Rotzoll a, Marcia Valbracht a, Kathryn Wangsness b, Jeff Wasson a and Michael Wichman a
More informationACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS
ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS Prepared by: Technical Manager Approved by: Chief Executive Officer Approval Date: 2017-08-10 Effective Date: 2017-08-10 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 3 2. COMPLIANCE
More informationStandards for Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation
Standards for Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation 2013 Edition cap.org Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation Program Standards for Accreditation 2013 Edition Preamble Forensic drug testing is a laboratory
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope: The purpose of these rules is to establish
More informationMicrobiology Expert Committee (MEC) Meeting Summary. January 16, 2013
Microbiology Expert Committee (MEC) Meeting Summary January 16, 2013 1. Roll Call and Minutes: Patsy Root (vice-chair) called the meeting to order at 8am MT in Denver, CO. Attendance is recorded in Attachment
More informationSCIEX Academic Partnership Program 2018 Rules and Application
SCIEX Academic Partnership Program 2018 Rules and Application Introduction SCIEX manufactures analytical tools, including instruments for research in the life science and clinical research communities,
More informationC A L I F O R N I A L A B O R AT O RY P E R S O N N E L
C A L I F O R N I A L A B O R AT O RY P E R S O N N E L Shiu-Land Kwong, CLS Regional Director of Lab Compliance & Risk Management The Permanente Medical Group Speaker Shiu-Land Kwong, CLS, is the Regional
More informationAgain, congratulations. If you have any questions, please contact Drake McGregor, Laboratory Accreditation Specialist, at (703)
July 31, 2017 Laboratory ID: 100967 Lisa Beach Maxxam Analytics 22345 Roethel Drive Novi, MI 48375 Dear Ms. Beach: Congratulations! The AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC s Analytical
More informationPolicy Subject Index Number Section Subsection Category Contact Last Revised References Applicable To Detail MISSION STATEMENT: OVERVIEW:
Subject Objectives and Organization Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Index Number Lab-0175 Section Laboratory Subsection General Category Departmental Contact Ekern, Nancy L Last Revised 10/25/2016 References
More informationCompetency Profile. General Medical Laboratory Technologist. Competencies Expected of an Entry-Level General Medical Laboratory Technologist
Profile General Medical Laboratory Technologist Competencies Expected of an Entry-Level General Medical Laboratory Technologist MAY 2005 Effective with the June 2010 Examination CSMLS March 2016 - Page
More informationIAF Mandatory Document for the Application of ISO/IEC in Medical Device Quality Management Systems (ISO 13485)
IAF MD 8:2011. International Accreditation Forum, Inc.(IAF) IAF Mandatory Document IAF Mandatory Document for the Application of ISO/IEC 17011 in Medical Device Quality Management Systems (ISO (IAF MD
More informationNABET Accreditation Criteria for QMS Consultant Organizations (ISO 9001: 2008)
NABET Accreditation Criteria for QMS Consultant Organizations (ISO 9001: 2008) NABET/ QMS CO/ 0111/00 Page 0 INTRODUCTION A number of consultant Organizations is helping organizations in various sectors
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR ASBESTOS, LEAD, INDOOR AIR QUALITY,
More informationSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE. Rules and Regulations
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER, SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF LABORATORY MEDICINE Rules and Regulations I Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives of the members of the Department shall be to provide the best possible
More informationACCREDITATION PROCESS FOR TESTING/ CALIBRATION/ MEDICAL LABORATORIES
Document No: SADCAS AP 12: Part 1 Issue No: 4 ACCREDITATION PROCESS FOR TESTING/ CALIBRATION/ MEDICAL LABORATORIES Prepared by: Technical Manager Approved by: Chief Executive Officer Approval Date: 2016-07-20
More informationTutorial: Basic California State Laboratory Law
Tutorial: Basic California State Laboratory Law This document is meant to cover basic elements of state laboratory law and should not be relied upon in place of legal advice or the official codes of California.
More informationTITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 307. TNI LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
Codification through the 2015 legislative session. Subchapters 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Board adoption - November 13, 2014 Approved by Governor's declaration on June 8, 2015 Effective date - September 15, 2015
More informationRenewal Inspection Report. Ninewells Hospital Date of Inspection: 13 May 2009 Date of Licence Committee: 12 August 2009
Renewal Inspection Report Ninewells Hospital 0004 Date of Inspection: 13 May 2009 Date of Licence Committee: 12 August 2009 0004 Page 1 of 22 Centre Details Person Responsible Nominal Licensee Centre name
More informationTAF Assessor Management in Laboratory Accreditation. Tim HO Chief of Mechanical Section, TAF 10 July 2013
TAF Assessor Management in Laboratory Accreditation Tim HO Chief of Mechanical Section, TAF 10 July 2013 Contents About TAF Relationship of DSS and TAF TAF Assessor Management in Laboratory Accreditation
More informationAccreditation of conformity assessment bodies with several locations
Accreditation of conformity assessment bodies with several locations 71 SD 0 014 Revision: 1.3 02. August 2016 Scope: This rule contains mandatory criteria, under which the accreditation of a conformity
More informationTITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 302. FIELD LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
Codification through the 2014 Legislative session. Subchapter 9 Board adoption - November 13, 2013 Approved by Governor's declaration on June 19, 2014 Effective date - September 12, 2014 TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT
More information(2) Ensure measures are established to control health and safety hazards from ionizing radiation sources and radioactive material.
Chapter 11 Radiation Safety Program 11-1. General a. Command policies and procedures for the procurement, production, transfer, storage, use, and disposal of radioactive material and ionizing and non-ionizing
More informationMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REGULATORY GUIDE FOR GAS CHROMATOGRAPHS AND X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYZERS Radioactive Materials Unit Minnesota Department of Health 625 Robert Street North P.O. Box 64975
More informationThe EUROPEAN REGISTERED TOXICOLOGIST (ERT) Guidelines for Registration 2016
FEDERATION OF EUROPEAN TOXICOLOGISTS & EUROPEAN SOCIETIES OF TOXICOLOGY Introduction The EUROPEAN REGISTERED TOXICOLOGIST (ERT) Guidelines for Registration 2016 The present document is an update of the
More information2008 All-Hazards Laboratory Preparedness Survey - Printable Version
2008 All-Hazards Laboratory Preparedness Survey - Printable Version Section 1: All-Hazards Preparedness (1) Who is the primary contact in your laboratory for this survey? Public Health Laboratory Director
More information103rd WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION CIVIL SUPPORT TEAM- GENERAL FACT SHEET
103rd WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION CIVIL SUPPORT TEAM- GENERAL FACT SHEET P.O. BOX 5800 Fort Richardson, Alaska 99505-5800 What is the Civil Support Team? The Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team,
More informationMEMORANDUM. PA-DEP Accredited Drinking Water Laboratories. Aaren S. Alger, Chief Laboratory Accreditation Program. DATE: December 7, 2017
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: PA-DEP Accredited Drinking Water Laboratories Aaren S. Alger, Chief Laboratory Accreditation Program DATE: December 7, 2017 RE: SDWA Reporting and Notification Requirements 25 Pa.
More informationAssociated with the District s Measure A Bond Program and Facilities Improvement Projects
Request for Qualifications / Proposal (RFQ/P) for Hazardous Material Assessment, Abatement Plan, Cost Estimating, and Monitoring Services Associated with the District s Measure A Bond Program and Facilities
More information3/14/2016. The Joint Commission and IQCP. Objectives. Before Getting Started
The Joint Commission and IQCP Stacy Olea, MBA, MT(ASCP), FACHE Executive Director Laboratory Accreditation The Joint Commission AACC 2015 Objectives Identify the three components of IQCP Determine a starting
More informationCOMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST
Revised: 09/27/2007 COMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST Disclaimer and Copyright Notice The College of American
More informationTuberculosis (TB) risk assessment worksheet
128 Tuberculosis (TB) Risk MMWR Assessment Worksheet December 30, 2005 Tuberculosis (TB) risk assessment worksheet This model worksheet should be considered for use in performing TB risk assessments for
More informationLABORATORY TECHNICIAN Series Specification
LABORATORY TECHNICIAN Series Specification DEFINITION: This series specification describes three classes which, under supervision, perform standardized analytical laboratory tests on water and wastewater
More informationDOE N /29/95 Expires: [1 year after initiation]
DOE N 441.1 SUBJECT: RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION FOR DOE ACTIVITIES 9/29/95 Expires: [1 year after initiation] The Department of Energy (DOE) undertook an initiative to reduce the burden of unnecessary, repetitive,
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORY ACCREDITATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope: The purpose of these rules is to
More informationCAP Most Frequent Deficiencies and How to Avoid Them. March 11, 2015
CAP 2015 Most Frequent Deficiencies and How to Avoid Them Jean Ball MBA,MT(HHS),MLT(ASCP) Inspection Services Team Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program March 11, 2015 Objectives: Participants will be
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)
L 253/8 Official Journal of the European Union 25.9.2013 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 920/2013 of 24 September 2013 on the designation and the supervision of notified bodies under Council
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 2 SENATE BILL 750* Health Care Committee Substitute Adopted 6/12/18
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 S SENATE BILL 0* Health Care Committee Substitute Adopted /1/ Short Title: Health-Local Confinement/Vet. Controlled Sub. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: May,
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION BROCHURE FOR BLOOD BANKS/ BLOOD CENTRES AND TRANSFUSION SERVICES
GENERAL INFORMATION BROCHURE FOR BLOOD BANKS/ BLOOD CENTRES AND TRANSFUSION SERVICES 2008 Blood Banks/ Blood Centres and Transfusion Services Accreditation Accreditation is a public recognition by a National
More informationP404 - Air Sampling of Asbestos and MMMF and Requirements for a Certificate of Reoccupation Following Clearance of Asbestos
Proficiency Module Syllabus P404 - Air Sampling of Asbestos and MMMF and Requirements for a Certificate of Reoccupation Following Clearance of Asbestos Aim To provide candidates with theoretical and practical
More informationNABH-AG ASSESSOR GUIDE FOR PANCHAKARMA CLINIC. Issue No. 04 Issue Date: 05/15 Page 1 of 13
NABH-AG ASSESSOR GUIDE FOR PANCHAKARMA CLINIC Issue No. 04 Issue Date: 05/15 Page 1 of 13 CONTENTS Sl. Title Page Nos. Content 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Role of Assessment team 3-5 3. Pre-Assessment 5 4.
More informationOSEAN Quality Criteria for Osteopathic Educational Providers
Certification Scheme OSEAN Quality Criteria for Osteopathic Educational Providers Date of issue: V1.0, 2014-10-01 Austrian Standards plus GmbH Dr. Peter Jonas Heinestraße 38 1020 Wien E-Mail: p.jonas@austrian-standards.at
More informationQUALITY POLICY MANUAL. Revision: 05 Author: T. Joseph Issue Date: 6/6/2010 Approved By: Dr S. King
This document together with the procedures specified in this manual, represent the quality management system of Laboratory Services & Consultations Ltd. It has been complied to meet the requirement of
More informationStrengtheningNationalQuality Control Laboratories in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Improve the Quality of Medicines
StrengtheningNationalQuality Control Laboratories in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Improve the Quality of Medicines February 2018 This document is made possible by the generous support of the American
More informationThe Pharmacy and Pharmacy Disciplines Act SASKATCHEWAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY PROFESSIONALS REGULATORY BYLAWS
THE SASKATCHEWAN GAZETTE, OCTOBER 16, 2015 1887 The Pharmacy and Pharmacy Disciplines Act SASKATCHEWAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY PROFESSIONALS REGULATORY BYLAWS Pursuant to The Pharmacy and Pharmacy Disciplines
More informationTESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF BUILDING OFFICIALS SPECIAL INSPECTION REGISTRATION PROGRAM TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY REGISTRATION APPLICATION FORM DIRECTIONS: PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS THOROUGHLY. TYPE
More informationThe AASHTO Accreditation Program. Procedures Manual for the Accreditation of Construction Materials Testing Laboratories.
The AASHTO Accreditation Program Procedures Manual for the Accreditation of Construction Materials Testing Laboratories June 29, 2017* *The changes made to Section 4.4.4 regarding the replacement of the
More informationALTERNATIVE FUEL MECHANIC TRAINING COMPONENT REMOVE II PROGRAM GUIDELINES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES
ALTERNATIVE FUEL MECHANIC TRAINING COMPONENT REMOVE II PROGRAM GUIDELINES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES SECTION I INTRODUCTION T he San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) is seeking applications
More informationAPHL Position Statement
APHL Position Statement Non-governmental Accrediting Bodies for Environmental Laboratories A. Statement of Position APHL supports the ongoing role and responsibility of government in the accreditation
More informationAuthorized Personnel to Review
October 31, 2017 Page 1 of 7 All documents developed or maintained for the Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards ( MFRPS ) are listed below. For each document, the following information is included:
More informationTITLE 11. CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF GAMBLING CONTROL NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING
TITLE 11. CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF GAMBLING CONTROL NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Nonprofit Organization Fundraiser; Required Forms; Registration and Operation of Fundraising Event The California Bureau of
More informationNUCLEAR MEDICINE James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital
NUCLEAR MEDICINE James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital Rotation Director: Dwight Achong, M.D. General Goals: During this rotation, the resident will learn how to perform and interpret dynamic
More informationTRAINING. A. Hazard Communication/Right-to-Know Training
XIII. TRAINING A multitude of training requirements are addressed by OSHA and other safety, health and environmental regulations. A summary of these requirements are presented. A. Hazard Communication/Right-to-Know
More informationThe Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 (SI 2002/253)
The Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 (SI 2002/253) Unofficial consolidated text Effective from 28 July 2017 This consolidated text has been produced for internal use by the Nursing and Midwifery Council.
More informationDepartment of Defense Water Safety on Military Bases
Department of Defense Water Safety on Military Bases May 2018 Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is
More information52nd Civil Support Team
52nd Civil Support Team (Weapons of Mass Destruction) Civil Support Team Mission The 52nd Civil Support Team deploys in support of civil authorities at a domestic Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear,
More informationRequest for Proposal for: Financial Audit Services
Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) Request for Proposal for: Financial Audit Services Due Date: June 23, 2015 at 4:00 pm to the attention of: Jill Batchelder Transit Analyst Eastern Sierra Transit
More informationThe Accreditation and Verification Regulation - Quick guide on the role of the verifier and the CA
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL CLIMATE ACTION Directorate C - Climate Strategy, Governance and Emissions from non-trading sectors CLIMA.C.2 - Governance and Effort Sharing Guidance Document The
More informationEye and Face Protection in Maryland Schools
Eye and Face Protection in Maryland Schools Maryland Code (State Law) Maryland Code/EDUCATION /TITLE 7. PUBLIC SCHOOLS/SUBTITLE 4. HEALTH AND SAFETY OF STUDENTS / 7-407. Protective eye device. 7-407. Protective
More informationCOLLABORATION OPPORTUNITIES ON OSH AMONG OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES: TURKEY S CAPACITY
T.C. ÇALIŞMA VE SOSYAL GÜVENLİK BAKANLIĞI İŞ SAĞLIĞI VE GÜVENLİĞİ GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITIES ON OSH AMONG OIC MEMBER COUNTRIES: TURKEY S CAPACITY Nihat EĞRİ OSH Expert Ankara 2013 CONTENT
More informationRequest for Letters of Intent to Apply for 2015 Technology Initiative Grant Funding
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/17/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-03159, and on FDsys.gov 7050-01 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Request
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures INSTITUTIONAL RADIATION SAFETY POLICY
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures INSTITUTIONAL RADIATION SAFETY POLICY 4-0302 RESEARCH December 2014 PURPOSE 1.01 The purpose of this policy is to formalize Oklahoma State University s (hereinafter
More informationRequest for Proposal for: Financial Audit Services
Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) Request for Proposal for: Financial Audit Services Due Date: March 21, 2018 at 4:00 pm to the attention of: Karie Bentley Administrative Analyst Eastern Sierra Transit
More informationCurrent Job Opportunities Effective Friday, December 1, 2017
Apply Online! http://www.longbeach.gov/civilservice Current Job Opportunities Effective Friday, December 1, 2017 JOB TITLE MONTHLY SALARY FILING DEADLINE Animal Health Technician $3,398 - $4,639 December
More informationPrepublication Requirements
Issued Prepublication Requirements The Joint Commission has approved the following revisions for prepublication. While revised requirements are published in the semiannual updates to the print manuals
More informationPURPOSE: This policy provides an overview of SHANDS Jacksonville Laboratory s commitment to the care and safety of the patients we serve.
PAGE 1 of 5 TITLE: Provision of Care Regarding Laboratory Services PURPOSE: This policy provides an overview of SHANDS Jacksonville Laboratory s commitment to the care and safety of the patients we serve.
More informationDEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. Office of Inspector General. Audit Report A-1415BPR-020
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION RICK SCOTT Governor KEN LAWSON Secretary MELINDA M. MIGUEL Chief Inspector General LYNNE T. WINSTON, Esq., CIG Inspector General Office of Inspector General
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON
THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Radiation-Generating Equipment Quality Assurance Program INDEX I. Design of the Radiation-Generating Equipment Quality Assurance (QA) Program..... 1 A. Purpose of the QA Safety
More informationWilliamson County & Cities Health District Epidemiologist I Foodborne Disease Epidemiologist
Williamson County & Cities Health District Epidemiologist I Foodborne Disease Epidemiologist Position Summary: Under the supervision of the Section Director, serves as a member of the Disease Control and
More information