ASFPM Quarterly State Web Meeting/Call (November 8, 2016) Welcome Ceil Strauss, ASFPM Chair. States with Recent Disasters Reduction in PA and HMGP

Transcription

1 ASFPM Quarterly State Web Meeting/Call (November 8, 2016) Welcome Ceil Strauss, ASFPM Chair States with Recent Disasters Reduction in PA and HMGP FEMA denied Kansas. Cut the damages claimed by the state by 90%. Cut in PA funds effects HMGP funding. Happened in Nebraska. Is this a new trend? Send Steve Samuelson examples if happening in your state to steve.samuelson@ks.gov EIU Flood Economics New online resource developed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) under Risk MAP contract. EIU is a research-based consulting firm doing public policy research with focus on disaster mitigation and disaster risk reduction division/sister company to The Economist newspaper. Seeking feedback, impacts, comments, questions re: o Is it useful? o What areas could be expanded? o Are there other audiences to reach out to? Soft launch November 2016 to January Launch February 2017 to September Business case for mitigation and mitigation action. Target Audience Local Officials, Mitigation Specialist, and Community leaders. 11 case studies. Demo the online tool. Categories on the tool include: Flood Mitigation Takeaway, Community Case Study, and The U.S. takes Action. Shows each state with different mitigation categories/actions over a cumulative time period or year by year. FEMA Stakeholder Workshop Call for abstracts currently open. Event to be held at the National Emergency Training Center (Emergency Management Institute) in Emmitsburg, MD - May 31, 2017 to June 2, Abstracts due by November 18, Limited space. SHMO and State NFIP Coordinators invited to submit abstracts and/or attend. Clarification of Newly Mapped

2 Replaces the Preferred Risk Policy Eligibility Extension (PRP EE). Must qualify for the PRP. Yearly rate increase limit of 18 percent. FEMA current increases only 14 to 15 percent. Lose the newly mapped qualifier if lapsed more than 90 days or 2 lapses in more than 30 days. Get your flood insurance policy before the effective date to have a full year to extend the PRP one year. Grandfathering is different from the newly mapped. Grandfather is in most cases A to a V zone change or BFE increases. Newly mapped procedures apply to both Pre and Post FIRM. Post- Flood Substantial Damage Determinations and Data Audience was polled on their access/use of Quick Claims data and BureauNet Quick Claim data may soon be accessed thru Bureau NET. No implementation timeline yet. Issues with Bureau NET limited to only 2 passwords per state.

3 Attendee Report: Qtrly State Call / Web Meeting - November /8/16 10:40 AM Attendee Details First Last State Title Anil Sarda anilsarda@eiu.com DC Consultant, Economic Intelligence Unit Bill Cap bill.cappuccio@dnr.iowa.gov IA State Coordinator Bill Nechamen william.nechamen@dec.ny.gov NY NFIP Coordinator Bruce Bender babender@cox.net AZ ASFPM Insurance Cmte. Co-Chair Ceil Strauss ceil.strauss@state.mn.us MN State Floodplain Manager, ASFPM Chair Chad Berginnis cberginnis@floods.org WI ASFPM Executive Director Corey Garyotis corey.garyotis@adeca.alabama.gov AL State NFIP Coordinator David Radabaugh david.radabaugh@ecy.wa.gov WA NFIP State Coordinator David Willard dwillard@water.nv.gov NV Floodplain Mgr/NFIP Coordinator Del Schwalls dschwalls@schwallsconsulting.com FL Vice Chair Jana Henderson jhenderson@mema.ms.gov MS SHMO Jennifer Walton jennifer.walton@ogilvy.com AZ Community Engagement & Risk Communication Jim Poppen jim.poppen@state.sd.us SD SHMO John Gerber john.gerber@ncdps.gov NC State NFIP Coordinator Joy Duperault joy.duperault@state.ma.us MA State NFIP coordinator/ SHMO Kait Laufenberg Kait@floods.org WI ASFPM Training & Chapter Coord. Karen McHugh karen.mchugh@sema.dps.mo.gov MO State Floodplain Manager Maria Lamm coxm@dnr.sc.gov SC State Floodplain Manager Mary Baker mary.baker@nebraska.gov NE SHMO Maureen OShea maureen.oshea@idwr.idaho.gov ID State NFIP Coordinator miles Anderson miles.anderson@em.myflorida.com FL SHMO Mitch Paine mitch.paine@nebraska.gov NE State NFIP Coordinator Rob Evans rob.evans@vermont.gov VT State FPM/NFIP Coordinator Sarah Devaney Ice sarah.devaney-ice@fema.dhs.gov DC FEMA Sarah Tippens Sarah.Tippens@fema.dhs.gov DC FEMA HQ Stacey Ricks sricks@mema.ms.gov MS State NFIP Coordinator Steve Ferryman saferryman@dps.ohio.gov OH SHMO Steve Samuelson steve.samuelson@ks.gov KS NFIP Specialist

4

5 November 2016 State Floodplain Management & Mitigation Call & Web Meeting November 8, am Central Time (12pm ET, 10am MT, 9am PT, 8am AKT, 7am HT) Today s Moderator Ceil Strauss, CFM ASFPM Chair ceil.strauss@state.mn.us

6 Agenda 1. Welcome & Instructions (5 min.) 2. States w/recent Disasters reduction in PA & HMGP?- Steve Samuelson (5 min.) 3. EIU Flood Economics Website Briefing Kathleen Boyer, FEMA (20 min.) 4. Upcoming FEMA Stakeholder Workshop Call for Abstracts Karen Helbrecht, FEMA (5 min.) 5. Clarification of Newly Mapped Policy & Rate Ceiling (Actuarial or X Zone) Bruce Bender (15 min.) 6. Post-flood Substantial Damage Determinations & Data, Quick Claims & Other Data Available Ceil Strauss(10 min.) 7. RFPs: Green Infrastructure/Low Impact Devel. & Urban Waters Restoration 8. Next WEB Meeting: Feb. 14, 11am States w/ Recent Disasters Reduction in PA & HMGP? Steve Samuelson ASFPM Region VII Regional Director steve.samuelson@ks.gov

7 States with recent Federal Disaster Declarations: Are you seeing PA/HMGP funding reductions from reviewers saying damage was pre-existing and not caused by flooding? Poll Question #1 Yes No Don t Know EIU Flood Economics Website Briefing Sarah Devaney-Ice Outreach Lead FEMA Sarah.Devaney-Ice@fema.dhs.gov Anil Sarda EIU Consulting The Economist Intelligence Unit anilsarda@eiu.com 3

8 The economic imperative for flood mitigation An Economist Intelligence Unit research program and website Floodeconomics.com 8 November 2016 Agenda About the EIU Project objectives Research The online tool Q&A 1 7 4

9 The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) is the research and analysis division of The Economist Group - a sister company to The Economist newspaper. Created in 1946, we have 70 years' experience developing timely, reliable and impartial analysis on economic, policy and development strategies. 1 8 Project purpose Changing the conversation about mitigation Asserts a strong economic and business case for mitigation and mitigation action Highlights the need (and utility) for mitigation investment Links mitigation more closely to the dialogue about community stability, resilience, and growth 1 9 5

10 Audience At the outset, Flood Economics has three target audiences: Local elected officials (i.e., mayors and local council members): The key decision makers Flood mitigation specialists (i.e., floodplain managers and hazard mitigation professionals): The subject experts and advisors Community leaders (i.e., association presidents and advocates): The voice of the community 2 0 Research overview RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH PROGRAM Comprehensive literature review Flood Loss Avoidance Studies Primary interviews with experts and community leaders Expert working group FEMA Hazard Mitigation grants database FEMA & US census data on communities 2 1 6

11 EIU research Core of the research program is the 11 community case studies 2 2 Flood Economics key takeaways 1. Flood mitigation benefits go beyond dollars and cents 2. Research shows community benefits of flood mitigation 3. Solutions exist to support funding challenges 4. Communities that mitigate may benefit from flood insurance premium discounts of up to 45% 5. The benefits of flood mitigation result from local action 2 3 7

12 The online tool Next Steps Soft launch: Nov 2016 Jan 2017 Launch & promotion: Feb 2017 September 2017 Possible launch event at NACo 2017 Speaking engagements at ASFPM 2017, NAFSMA2017, etc. Roadshow community events, targeted media, social media promotion Content additions/changes: TBD Ascertain initial reactions, evaluate impact: Ongoing 10 8

13 For more information Kathleen Boyer Hazard Mitigation Specialist FEMA Sally Goldman Program Director The Economist FEMA Stakeholder Workshop Call for Presenters Karen Helbrecht Mitigation Planner FEMA 9

14 2017 Annual Hazard Mitigation Stakeholder Workshop Mitigate Together: Coordinating Resources for Resilient Communities Emmitsburg, MD May 31 June 2, 2017 Abstracts are due November 18 th Call for Abstracts Submit to Submittal form will be included in the notes from the call Clarification of Newly Mapped Policy & Rate Ceiling (Actuarial or X Zone) Bruce Bender ASFPM Insurance Cmte. Co-Chair babender@cox.net

15 Newly Mapped Procedure Replaced PRP EE Must qualify for PRP (claims) Must be effective within 12 months after new FIRM s effective date Will increase no more than 18% a year Multiplier is applied each January 1 Will lose rating option if policy lapses: Once >90 days after expiration Twice > 30 days after expiration 39 Newly Mapped Procedure 01/10/2017 Map Effective Date 01/09/ mos. after Map Effective Date 2016 Standard Zone X = $2, Zone X 01/08/2017 New Policy Effective Date PRP Policy $400* 1/1/11 Zone AE 01/08/2018 Renewal Date Newly Mapped Property (PRP Rate*) $480 01/08/2019 Renewal Date Newly Mapped Property Rate** $560 01/08/2020 Renewal Date 2020 Newly Mapped Property Rate** $650 $200K/$80K Building/Contents April 2016; excludes HFIAA Surcharge *Current PRP Rates (assumes 3 % increase after 2017) plus higher FPF **Guesstimates Actual planned rate increases unknown 40 11

16 Post-Flood Substantial Damage Determinations & Data, Quick Claims & other Data Available Ceil Strauss ASFPM Chair Did you know that states can get quick claim data from the FEMA Region to give to local officials? Poll Question #2 Yes No Don t Know 12

17 If Yes Has your state had trouble obtaining quick claim data from the Region in a timely manner? Poll Question #3 Yes No Don t Know Does your state have access to BureauNet? Poll Question #4 Yes Use frequently Yes Not sure how to use No Never heard of it No Cannot access Don t Know 13

18 RFP: Integrate GI/LID in Hazard Mitigation Plans EPA seeking RFPs for tech. assist. to States/Locals to integrate Green Infrastructure / Low Impact Development (GI/LID) in Hazard Mitigation Plans $50,000 available for two pilots. Proposals are due by Dec. 15 see notes for details Objectives: 1. Enable FEMA funds to be directed to GI/LID projects for their small storm flood loss reduction benefits 2. Help institutionalize GI/LID in flood risk management planning while emphasizing water quality benefits. RFP: 5 Star & Urban Waters Restoration Grants EPA, USFS, & USFWS seeking applications $2.5 Million in grants nationwide Proposals are due by January 31st see notes for details. Applic. process WEBINAR: Nov. 15th Objective: Devel. Community capacity to sustain local natural resources focused on water quality, watersheds, and species & habitat Projects include: wetland, riparian, forest & coastal habitat restor., water quality monitoring & stormwater mgmt., community outreach, education & stewardship Priority: projects in urban, suburban and/or rural areas that advance water quality in environ. justice communities (minority & low-income populations) 14

19 SAVE THE DATE Feb. 11am Central Time Upcoming Web Meetings/Calls 15

20 Poll Results State Floodplain Management & Mitigation Web Meeting/Call November 8, 11am Central Time Poll Question #1 Poll Question #2 Are you seeing PA/HMGP funding reductions from reviewers saying damage was pre-existing and not caused by flooding? No 47% Yes 18% Don't Know 35% Did you know that states can get quick claim data from the FEMA Region to give to local officials? Yes 65% No 35% don't Know 0% Poll Question #3 Poll Question #4 If Yes Has your state had trouble obtaining quick claim data from the Region in a timely manner? YES - use frequently Does your state have access to BureauNet? 12 Yes 33% Don't Know 27% YES - not sure how to use NO - never heard of it 0 2 No 40% NO - can't access /trouble accessing it Don't Know 1 1

21 CALL FOR ABSTRACTS Abstracts are encouraged for presentations that touch on the workshop theme of Mitigate Together: Coordinating Resources for Resilient Communities. Abstracts will be reviewed and notifications of acceptance will be given electronically in January Please submit only one abstract per presentation. Send your abstracts NLT COB Friday, November 18, 2016 to FEMA Name: Agency: 1. I would like to present a: Panel Discussion Breakout Session Plenary Discussion Best Practice or Success Story Poster Session* 2. Proposed Panel/Breakout/Plenary/Gallery Presentation Title: 3. Provide a brief description of the topic/subject matter: 4. Indicate the length of the presentation including a 15 minute Q&A period: *Poster Session: A 3-foot by 4-foot vertical display space will be provided for your materials. Your participation in one or more events during the workshop is requested to answer questions and discuss your project with meeting attendees. A formal presentation is not required.

22 5. Will you allow FEMA HQ to post a.pdf version of your presentation to the HMA website? Yes No 6. Name/Title/Organization of Primary Presenter: 7. Presenter s 8. Presenter s Phone Number: 9. Primary Presenter s Bio: (Please limit to 200 words or less.) 10. List the Name/Title/Organization of any additional co presenters/panelists.

23 RFP for Technical Assistance for EPA Regions to Provide to State/Local Communities on GI/LID in Hazard Mitigation Planning - Proposals Due 12/15/2016 Objectives: 1) Enable FEMA funds to be directed to GI/LID projects for their small storm flood loss reduction benefits; 2) help institutionalize GI/LID in flood risk management planning while emphasizing its water quality benefits. Why Now? FEMA policy changes in 2014/ 2015 encourage GI/LID and add ecosystem services values in the Benefit/Cost analysis. FEMA clarified that GI/LID in Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) areas are eligible for funding to prevent National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)-insured losses (i.e. sewerage in basements). Not all eligible projects are selected for funding by FEMA. Background: EPA/FEMA (Mitigation) MOU in Office of Sustainable Communities. The current liaison is Adhir Kackar. Adhir leads communication with FEMA, attends FEMA meetings, and leads coordination of Regional partnerships through the Office of Sustainable Communities (OSC) in Regions. Lisa Hair/HQ/NPSCB and Laura Bachle/HQ/Wetlands lead this technical assistance. Potential Funding: Fund two pilots at $50k each. A Regional FEMA co-lead is required, at least for in-kind labor. Regions are to propose how to use funds. Suggestions include: Hiring a third-party technical expert to review local plans and provide recommendations (A peer review entity may also be funded such as university or professional organization); Planning, facilitating and document preparation in support of a workshop or charrette. It is highly recommended that regions leverage other sources, such as local government in-kind labor, state in-kind labor, or other Federal agency (DOT, HUD, NOAA) assistance,. Ideally, the project would be submitted to the State Silver Jackets Team for selection by USACE for implementation as a USACE Flood Risk Management (FRM) group project. This would add substantial technical capability, exposure, and transferability. Funds: Fund are FY 17/18 money and must be obligated by 9/17 and spent by 9/18. Alternatives for Funds Obligation: Regions may identify a contracting vehicle they plan to use to access an appropriate contractor with experience in FEMA flood mitigation plans, green infrastructure, and the local or state area in general. For example, a contractor that worked for FEMA or that locality on the Hazard Mitigation Plan; Region 10 used their Region s Interagency Agreement (IA) to transfer funds to their FEMA co-lead, who used them to fund their Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) EPA HQ has created a Task Order to facilitate this work under the Conflict Prevention and Resolution Services (CPRS) contract with CSRA EPA HQ provides COR services via technical direction, working with a technical contact in the Region. The task order is available to provide a wide range of third-party facilitation and neutral technical expertise. Required of EPA Regional Staff: An Office of Sustainable Communities (OSC)-related staff person and a GI/LID-related staff person to co-lead within EPA. It is not necessary for the co-leads to be on-site. A Division Director taking a POC role is recommended because of the interagency level collaboration.

24 Scope of Work: Collaborate with FEMA and a local or state entity to integrate GI/LID into their State or Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). This can be concurrent with the EPA region or EPA partners priorities regarding wider planning issues or benefits valuation. Because of the limited resources, this funded effort must focus on LID/GI at multiple scales in stream/riverine/urban settings. Coastal, climate change, and ecosystem service valuations, while important, are beyond the scope for these funds, but of course can be integrated by other partners in an overall HMP effort. Integration of watershed plans, MS4 permits, TMDLs, natural resource management plans, municipal planning, parks management plans, transportation, and maintenance plans, local ordinances, etc., may hold potential for increasing GI/LID in the short or long term, reducing flood losses. Identification of potential projects in this context may facilitate implementation or FEMA funding if the benefit/cost criteria are met. Deliverables: Status report on process findings, recommendations for the hazard mitigation plan for the pilot site, and; recommendations for the general process improvement of incorporating LID/GI into hazard mitigation planning, presentation suitable for conference outreach. NOTE: It is not expected that LID/GI will be incorporated into an HMP under this scope, only that recommendations be provided to locality or state on how it could be done, and the associated benefits. All recommendations and stated benefits would need to be reviewed by the FEMA partner to ensure they are appropriate. Proposal to include: 1) Team Office of Sustainable Communities (OSC), LID/GI staff persons from EPA Region, EPA DD Point of Contact, FEMA Regional Mitigation staff partner, town or state; 2) External team members, including locality or state, or planning district, letter of intent and contribution; 3) Project approach including consideration of Silver Jackets; 4) Designation of Team Leader/COR. Selection criteria (not in order): 1. Level of commitment, availability, and nature of team members. 2. Level of experience of contractor in mitigation planning, LID/GI, and knowledge of local hazard mitigation plan and other local plans for the community being evaluated. 3. Feasibility and ease of contracting plan proposed by the Region. 4. Project approach elements that highlight potential for success: Community past engagement in LID/GI, known potential flooding problem areas that LID/GI could help mitigate, the community s past experience and knowledge of working with FEMA and applying for FEMA grants, the extent of environmental-water related plans and permits that could be evaluated for appropriateness to integrate, EPA s past experience in collaborative efforts with the community. 5. Project approach elements that offer a higher-profile return for EPA: such as an Urban Waters Community, or other outstanding characteristic. 6. Schedule with funds to be spent by 9/ Intent for the team (led by the community through the State Hazard Mitigation Officer) to try to apply for Corps Silver Jackets participation. END

25 2017 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Full Proposal Due Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 by 11:59 PM Eastern Time OVERVIEW The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) and the Wildlife Habitat Council (WHC), in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USDA Forest Service (USFS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), FedEx, Southern Company and Alcoa Foundation are pleased to solicit applications for the 2017 Five Star and Urban Waters Restoration program. The Five Star and Urban Waters program will award approximately $2.5 million in grants nationwide. The Five Star and Urban Waters Restoration grant program seeks to develop community capacity to sustain local natural resources for future generations by providing modest financial assistance to diverse local partnerships focused on improving water quality, watersheds and the species and habitats they support. Projects include a variety of ecological improvements including: wetland, riparian, forest and coastal habitat restoration; wildlife conservation; community tree canopy enhancement; and/or water quality monitoring and stormwater management; along with targeted community outreach, education and stewardship. NFWF may use a mix of public and private funding sources to support any grant made through this program. Priority will be given to projects in urban, suburban and/or rural areas that advance water quality goals in environmental justice communities such as neighborhoods with high concentrations of minority and low-income populations. Projects that increase access to the benefits of nature, reduce the impact of environmental hazards and engage these communities in the project planning, outreach and implementation will have priority for funding. We expect at least 50% of the grants made under this RFP to go to projects engaging these communities. GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS Geographic focus depends on funding available from the funding partners. Grants for this program are available nationwide, but additional funding is available for the geographic priorities listed in the Funding Availability section of this RFP. Page 1 of 12

26 PROGRAM PRIORITIES Proposals should address at least one bullet under each of the five following bolded priorities. On-the-Ground Restoration Restore and/or create wetlands, coastal or riparian areas that address key species and habitats and link directly to established watershed and conservation plans Restore, design and/or create forest habitat and/or community tree canopy leading directly to improved water quality of urban watersheds Manage stormwater or address water scarcity by designing and/or implementing green infrastructure, using best management practices like increasing tree canopy, bioswales, permeable pavers, bioretention, green roofs, downspout disconnection, installation of native vegetation and other proven practices for water quality, habitats and species Design and/or create habitat and/or engage residents in restoration at community public areas such as schools, parks, birding trails and more Collect and analyze local waterway samples that could be used to determine the effectiveness of current stream/wetland restoration and green infrastructure efforts and effectively inform future planning and decision-making Develop/implement trash and litter prevention programs designed to keep urban waterways and riverfronts clean Enhance, restore, conserve, and/or improve land and natural resources management in drinking water protection areas through green/natural infrastructure installations, outreach, education and training on watershed protection practices and their impacts on urban drinking water. Projects must demonstrate the linkage between upstream land-use decisions and the quality, quantity and safety of drinking water. Community Partnerships Must involve five or more partners (public and private entities) including the applicant Directly engage a diverse group of community partners to achieve ecological and specific educational outcomes including partnerships among upstream and downstream communities Demonstrate that the project will advance existing local planning and development for resilient communities and/or propose to foster new collaborations to coordinate a diverse stakeholder partnership that develop and/or implements new plans Environmental Outreach, Education & Training Must integrate meaningful outreach, education and training into the proposed on-the-ground activities that advance local watershed and conservation goals Engage the public particularly youth in hands-on, outdoor conservation experiences that build awareness of the importance of protecting and recovering priority species and habitats and promote stewardship. Priority will be given to projects engaging environmental justice communities. Establish or advance a citizen science or water quality monitoring program that involves community members and/or addresses community water quality priorities. Eligible activities include water quality and/or habitat surveys, bird surveys, monitoring efforts that involve the collection, assessment, analysis and communication of water quality data (existing or new) to identify areas of concern Page 2 of 12

27 Provide job training, placement and job performance follow-up for stream/wetlands restoration, green infrastructure installation, operation and maintenance Improve citizen understanding of damaging trash and litter impacts in local waterways that affect community health and local economies Measurable Results Must result in specific, measurable ecological, educational and community benefits Identify measurable activities and metrics which clearly link to watershed and community outcomes Document a high level of community engagement to support fish and wildlife habitat, urban forestry and water quality-related activities and improve understanding across diverse audiences of how fish and wildlife conservation, clean water and healthy forests contribute to community wellbeing Sustainability Must include a plan for maintenance and care of the project beyond the grant period Reflect a commitment to community strength and long-term capacity to remain engaged as partners Directly connect outcomes to community benefits of watershed restoration such as clean water, public health benefits, local economic development and jobs Fulfill or advance priorities identified through local planning efforts, including watershed plans, climate resilience plans and/or sustainability plans METRICS Project Activity Recommended Metric Additional Guidance Land, wetland restoration # Acres restored Provide # and type of habitat restored. If different types of habitat restored, provide # acres for each individual type, including wetlands, springs, saltwater marshes and beach habitat Removal of invasives # Acres restored Provide # acres restored and type of invasives removed Restoration planning/design/permitti ng # Acres restored Provide # acres impacted directly by plan Riparian restoration # Miles restored Provide # miles riverbank planted (decimals are acceptable) Land, wetland restoration # Trees planted Identify the type of tree(s) planted, approximate age and caliper of the trees Page 3 of 12

28 Best Management Practices implementation for livestock fencing Best Management Practices implementation for stormwater runoff Best Management Practices implementation for stormwater runoff Improved management practices Building institutional capacity # Miles of fencing installed # Acres with Best Management Practices Volume stormwater prevented # Acres under improved management # FTE with sufficient training Provide # miles fencing installed Provide # acres implemented with Best Management Practices including the type of green infrastructure being implemented Provide volume of stormwater captured by new green infrastructure practices including Best Management Practices for stormwater management Provide # acres under improved management including Best Management Practices for nutrient and sediment reduction Provide # full-time employees provided with training through the project Building institutional capacity # of organizations contributing to project goals Provide # partner organizations Economic benefits # jobs sustained Provide # jobs continued or sustained through grant project Economic benefits # jobs created Provide number of individuals hired by organization or contractor directly working on project (non-volunteers) Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance # people reached Provide # of people reached Volunteer participation # volunteers participating Provide number of community members directly engaged in project. If volunteers include youth (up to age 18) or veterans, specify # youth or # veterans. Monitoring # streams/sites being monitored Identify the number of sites that will be monitored as part of the project Other # Maps or assessments completed Provide the number of maps or other assessments of green infrastructure resources, tree canopies, trails and other community assets created during the project period Page 4 of 12

29 Other #lbs of trash or debris removed or prevented from entering waterways Provide lbs of trash or debris removed from waterways or other restoration sites or expected amount prevented from entering waterways and specify removal or prevention. ELIGIBILITY Eligible and Ineligible Entities Eligible applicants include non-profit 501(c) organizations, state government agencies, local governments, municipal governments, Indian tribes and educational institutions Ineligible applicants include: unincorporated individuals, businesses, international organizations and U.S. federal government agencies Ineligible Uses of Grant Funds NFWF funds and matching contributions may not be used to support political advocacy, fundraising, lobbying, litigation, terrorist activities or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations. NFWF funds may not be used to support ongoing efforts to comply with legal requirements, including permit conditions, mitigation and settlement agreements. However, grant funds may be used to support projects that enhance or improve upon existing baseline compliance efforts. FUNDING AVAILABILITY Approximately $2,500,000 is available nationwide for projects meeting program priorities. There is one round of full proposals annually for this program. Awards range from $20,000 to $50,000 with an average size of $30,000 and grants awarded per year. Grants should span one to two years in length with a start date in July Applications requesting more than $30,000 should propose projects longer than one year. There is one application submitted to NFWF for all sources of funding. A detailed list of funders is provided to identify areas of the country where additional funds are available and to provide information on any funder-specific recommendations that applicants should include in proposals. Page 5 of 12

30 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Five Star Restoration Training Program Funding Available: Approximately $215,000 is available nationwide from EPA to fund projects. These funds are available nationwide, in any size community. Urban Waters Federal Partnership, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Forest Service Urban Forestry Funding Available: Approximately $522,000 is available from U.S. Forest Service and EPA, through the Urban Waters Federal Partnership, to improve urban water quality, restore riparian habitat and urban forests and increase public access in developed watersheds throughout the United States. Funds are available nationwide for urban areas. Special consideration will be made for projects which directly advance priorities of the 19 Urban Waters Federal Partnership designated locations and/or are in designated source water protection areas. Applicants for this special consideration are strongly encouraged to note in the abstract and narrative which Federal Partnership the project will be located. Please refer to these links to identify those areas: To view Urban Waters Federal Partnership designated locations: To view watersheds critical to sources of drinking water, please reach out to your state drinking water program office or visit the "Source Water Protection for Urban Waters" web map: 17c75 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Urban Programs Funding Available: Approximately $405,000 is available from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to fund projects that engage urban neighbors and foster a sense of stewardship where there are Fish and Wildlife Service lands or offices nearby (within approximately 25+/- miles). Priority areas could also include locations where there are existing Urban Wildlife Refuge Partnerships or with established Urban Bird Treaty Cities with the Fish and Wildlife Service. Proposals should articulate tangible ways the Fish and Wildlife Service can become an asset to the community. Examples of asset building would include: providing technical assistance in fish and wildlife issues, providing pathways for youth employment or community education and recreational enjoyment. $225,000 of these funds comes from the FWS Urban Wildlife Refuge Partnerships to engage communities in conservation on easily-accessible lands that the Service does not own. They involve residents in place-based outdoor experiences that foster connections with fish, wildlife and their habitats. Proposals should address the Urban Wildlife Refuge Partnership priorities (partnerships, measurable results, sustainability) and demonstrate how the project will meet at least one of the Standards of Excellence for Urban Wildlife Refuges and Partnerships (located at Page 6 of 12

31 $180,000 of these funds comes from the Urban Bird Treaty program and projects should have an emphasis on protecting, restoring and enhancing urban habitats for birds, engaging people in bird conservation and citizen science activities, hazard reduction for birds such as bird-safe building programs, and connecting diverse and youth audiences through education and outreach that involves to nature through birding and bird conservation. Projects supported with this funding do not have to be located in an existing Urban Bird Treaty city but grantee/partners must agree to work toward designation if funded. Southern Company Five Star Restoration Program Funding Available: Approximately $360,000 is available from Southern Company and its operating companies (Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power and Mississippi Power) to support on-the-ground wetland, riparian, in-stream or coastal habitat conservation and restoration projects in the Southern Company service area served by its four electric retail subsidiaries. Applicants should clearly describe in their proposal how the project will address any priority and/or at-risk species, habitats or conservation actions identified in their State Wildlife Action Plan (or other recovery or conservation plans), and how the entity in charge of implementing the plan is involved with the project, as applicable. A mixture of urban and rural communities is expected across the applicants for this specific funding. Geographic Priorities: Southern Company will support high quality projects in the following states: Alabama (excluding Lauderdale, Colbert, Lawrence, Limestone, Madison, Marshall, Morgan, Jackson and DeKalb counties) Florida Panhandle (west of the Apalachicola River) Georgia (excluding Union, Fannin and Towns counties) Mississippi (including the following counties, north to south: Leake, Neshoba, Kemper, Scott, Newton, Lauderdale, Smith, Jasper, Clarke, Jefferson Davis, Covington, Jones, Wayne, Marion, Lamar, Forrest, Perry, Greene, George, Stone, Pearl River, Hancock, Harrison and Jackson.) Click here to view a map of the Southern Company Service Area. FedEx: Funding Available: Approximately $412,500 is available from FedEx to support urban conservation and restoration. All proposals in these areas must propose a volunteer event for up to 100 local FedEx employees in the project narrative to be considered for funding under this funding source. Geographic Priorities: These funds will support projects in any of the following metropolitan areas: Boston, MA Los Angeles, CA San Francisco/Oakland, CA Chicago, IL Memphis, TN Seattle, WA Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX Washington, DC Northern NJ/New York, NY Indianapolis, IN Pittsburgh, PA Miami, FL Page 7 of 12

32 Colorado Springs, CO Philadelphia, PA Harrison, AR Phoenix, AZ Cleveland, OH Atlanta, GA Portland, OR Lakeland, FL New Berlin, WI Akron/Uniontown, OH Alcoa Foundation Funding Available: Approximately $30,000 is available from Alcoa Foundation to support community-based restoration and stewardship projects within the selected geographic priorities. Geographic Priorities: Alcoa Foundation will support high quality projects in the following metropolitan areas: Cleveland, OH Barberton, OH Additional Private Foundation Support Funding Available: Canton, OH Farmington Hills, MI Approximately $600,000 is available from private foundation funding to support community-based habitat restoration and stewardship projects in the seven states listed below. Grant recipients should include detailed information on the support of non-game animal species and habitat through grant activities in their proposal, specifically as these habitats related to underserved human communities including tribal communities and the sustained protection of wild animal species and their habitats. A mixture of urban and rural communities is expected across the applicants for this specific funding. Geographic Priorities: This funding will support high quality projects in the following states: Alaska Idaho Washington Montana North Dakota Wisconsin Minnesota MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS The ratio of matching contributions offered is considered during the review process, and projects are required to meet or exceed a 1:1 match ratio to be competitive. Matching contributions must be non-federal in nature, may include in-kind contributions of staff and volunteer time, work performed, materials and services donated, cash or other tangible contributions to the project objectives and outcomes. The cost of recent land acquisition or easement may also qualify as match for a project involving work at the acquired site. Additionally, partner contributions can serve as matching contributions and grantees for this grant program commonly use a large amount of in-kind matching contributions to reach this threshold by utilizing their community partnerships to generate match. Applicants are highly encouraged to Page 8 of 12

33 contact NFWF for assistance in determining what qualifies as in-kind or any other matching contributions. In addition, if they would not be paid with requested grant funding, indirect costs may be applied as match by an applicant with a federally approved indirect rate (more information about using indirect costs as match can be found here). To be eligible, matching contributions typically must be: Not paid by the Federal government under another Federal award Verifiable from the grantee s records Not included as contributions for any other award Necessary and reasonable for accomplishment of project or program objectives Allowable costs based on the program and funding source guidelines Committed directly to the project and used within the period of performance EVALUATION CRITERIA All proposals will be screened for relevance, accuracy, completeness and compliance with NFWF and funding source policies. Proposals then will be evaluated based on the extent to which they meet the following criteria. Required Criteria: Program Goals and Priorities Proposed project contributes to the Five Star and Urban Waters program s overall habitat, water quality and species conservation goals and has specific, quantifiable performance metrics to evaluate project success. Project directly addresses each of the program priorities outlined above in this Request for Proposals. Partnership An appropriate partnership of five or more partners exists to implement the project and the project is supported by a strong local partnership that leverages additional funds and will sustain it after the life of the grant. Identify proposed partners, if known (including potential or contemplated subawards to third party subrecipients of the applicant), the roles they will play in implementing the project and how this project will build new or enhance existing partnerships. (Note: a project partner is any local community, non-profit organization, for profit organization tribe and/or local, state, and federal government agency that contributes to the project in a substantial way and is closely involved in the completion of the project.) Technical Merit Project is technically sound and feasible and the proposal sets forth a clear, logical and achievable work plan and timeline. Project engages appropriate technical experts throughout project planning, design and implementation to ensure activities are technically sound and feasible. Conservation or Watershed Plan and Context The project advances an existing drought management, watershed or conservation plan/strategy. Proposals should include a clear, direct link Page 9 of 12

34 between the proposed project to the plans, what entity is in charge of implementing the plan and how the project outcomes will coordinate results with that entity if not already a project partner. Budget Costs are allowable, reasonable and budgeted in accordance with NFWF s Budget Instructions cost categories. Federally-funded projects must be in compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable (OMB Uniform Guidance). Funding Need Project establishes a clear need for the funds being requested, and demonstrates that activities would not move forward absent funding. Project identifies demographic characteristics of environmental justice communities benefiting from the project. Monitoring Proposal includes a plan for monitoring progress during and after the proposed project period to track project success and adaptively address new challenges and opportunities as they arise. Long-term Sustainability Project will be maintained to ensure benefits are achieved and sustained beyond the life of the grant. Proposal should detail how future funding will be secured to implement necessary long-term monitoring and maintenance activities. Other Criteria: Transferability Project has potential and plan to transfer lessons learned to other communities and/or to be integrated into government programs and policies. Communication Project includes a detailed plan to communicate information about the project to appropriate audiences. Past Success Applicant has a proven track record in implementing conservation and education practices with specific, measurable results. OTHER General Applicants will be required to indicate the status of all permits required to comply with federal, state or local requirements. Procurement If the applicant chooses to specifically identify proposed Contractor(s) for Services, an award by NFWF to the applicant does not necessarily constitute NFWF s express written authorization for the applicant to procure such specific services noncompetitively. When procuring goods and services, NFWF recipients must follow documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations. Publicity and Acknowledgement of Support Award recipients will be required to grant NFWF and applicable funding partners the right and authority to publicize the project and NFWF s financial support for the grant in press releases, publications and other public communications. Recipients may also be asked by NFWF to provide high-resolution (minimum 300 dpi) photographs depicting the project. Page 10 of 12

35 Environmental Compliance Requirements Projects selected to receive Federal funding may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act (state and federal), and National Historic Preservation Act. As may be applicable, successful applicants may be required to comply with such Federal, state or local requirements and obtain all necessary permits and clearances Federal Funding Requirements Projects selected to receive Federal funding may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Historic Preservation Act. Documentation of compliance with these regulations must be approved prior to initiating activities that disturb or alter habitat or other features of the project site(s). Applicants should budget time and resources to obtain the needed approvals. Federally-funded projects must operate in compliance with the OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable to the applicant. Quality Assurance If a project involves significant monitoring, data collection or data use, grantees will be asked to prepare and submit quality assurance documentation ( Applicants should budget time and resources to complete this task. Permits Successful applicants will be required to provide sufficient documentation that the project expects to receive or has received all necessary permits and clearances to comply with any Federal, state or local requirements. Where projects involve work in the waters of the United States, NFWF strongly encourages applicants to conduct a permit pre-application meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers prior to submitting their proposal. In some cases, if a permit pre-application meeting has not been completed, NFWF may require successful applicants to complete such a meeting prior to grant award TIMELINE Dates of activities are subject to change. Please check the Program page of the NFWF website for the most current dates and information (Five Star and Urban Waters program website). Applicant webinar (Click here to register) November 15, 2016, 2 p.m., Eastern Time Full Proposal Due Date January 31, 2017, 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time Review Period February to June 2017 Awards Announced July 2017 HOW TO APPLY All application materials must be submitted online through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation s Easygrants system. 1. Go to to register in our Easygrants online system. New users to the system will be prompted to register before starting the application (if you already are a registered user, use your existing login). Enter your applicant information. Page 11 of 12

36 2. Once on your homepage, click the Apply for Funding button and select this RFP s Funding Opportunity from the list of options. 3. Follow the instructions in Easygrants to complete your application. Once an application has been started, it may be saved and returned to later for completion and submission. APPLICATION ASSISTANCE A PDF version of this RFP can be downloaded at the Five Star and Urban Waters program website. A Tip Sheet is available for quick reference while you are working through your application. This document can be downloaded at the Five Star and Urban Waters program website. Additional information to support the application process can be accessed on the NFWF website s Applicant Information page ( For more information or questions about this RFP, please contact: Danny Bowater (All Geographies) Coordinator, Community-Based Conservation Daniel.Bowater@nfwf.org Lindsay Vacek (Southern Company Service Area only) Coordinator, Southern Regional Office (202) Lindsay.Vacek@nfwf.org Carrie Clingan Program Director, Community Stewardship and Youth Carrie.Clingan@nfwf.org For issues or assistance with our online Easygrants system, please contact: Easygrants Helpdesk Easygrants@nfwf.org Voic Hours: 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday Include: Your name, proposal ID #, address, phone number, program to which you are applying and a description of the issue. Page 12 of 12