2012 CHF South Sudan Second Round Allocation

Transcription

1 2012 CHF South Sudan Second Round Allocation com/forum/southern-sudan-wash-forum/

2

3 Justification To provide agreed WASH core pipeline supplies for 900,000 people (36% of total response target by the CAP response) through the CHF, CERF and other funds. The planned interventions will provide water and sanitation facilities and services, and hygiene messages in emergency situations. It will also provide some long term facilities to vulnerable populations. It will include establishment of management committees and training to ensure continuous use and sustainability. It will ensure participation of women in key aspects.

4 CATEGORY A Replenishing WASH core pipelines and ensuring adequate logistics support. To support the most time sensitive and underfunded needs and ensure that essential common services are in place in priority states. The pipeline should also cater for the needs of Abyei returnees.

5 One (1) project USD 4,500,546 OVERVIEW: Category A Emergency water equipment, essential spares, water treatment inputs, hygiene Kits, latrine slabs & tools, soap, tarpaulin, water collection, treatment and storage containers, filter cloth, WASH stickers & posters USD 2,527,100. (56%) Transportation, handling and storage USD 1,482,918 (36%) Staffing USD 162,100 (3.6%) Around 1/3 of the total core pipeline requirements will be covered. 300,000 emergency affected people provided with WASH humanitarian supplies.

6 CATEGORY B Supporting front line WASH services in vulnerable states States with large numbers of vulnerable groups, particularly IDPs, returnees, host community in northern border states and areas prone to conflict, food insecurity and high levels of malnutrition.

7 Seven (7) projects Total US$ value of projects: $2,500,881 OVERVIEW: Category B Covering the needs of around 260,000 affected population in Jonglei, Upper Nile, Unity, Warrap (including people displaced from Abyei), and Northern Bahr el Ghazal. Activity Emergency WASH (facilities and supplies) 10,675 15,000 1,100 2,000 30,000 Sustained access to safe water supply 14,000 2,500 6,000 15,000 10,000 27,000 5,000 Sustained hygienic sanitation 15,000 3,200 Community hygiene and sanitation campaign 18,000 12,000 50,000 School hygiene and sanitation campaign 4,500 School latrine rehabilitation 2,000 2,000 1,635 HH latrines 1,200 8,400 1, Training - Hygiene & sanitation, management, maintenance, etc Total 51,051 11,050 24,540 30,000 13,105 41,840 88,230

8 Cluster Strategy The WASH cluster strategy aims to increase WASH access to vulnerable populations strengthen their abilities to withstand crises facilitate behaviour change.

9 Why the projects? Address key strategic areas of provision of emergency supplies, services and facilities, sustainable use, and behaviour change The recommended projects target areas currently affected by disasters They compliment on-going works from CHF 1st round and other funding received

10 260, , Returnees IDPs Refugees 2 1

11 Lessons Learnt It is crucially important to procure and preposition WASH core pipeline supplies at strategic locations before the onset of the rainy season. Coordination and communication between State and Juba levels and with Government need to be streamlined for effective humanitarian response. Continuity within the WASH Cluster coordination and backup mechanism

12 With the current Portfolio: Key Lessons and Current Portfolio Procurement of WASH core pipeline supplies through the CHF 2nd round funding will be done immediately to fill in critical gaps. Stocks will then be moved to hubs during the dry season when road access is reestablished. State Focal Points have been identified from NGOs, and are being supported through the WASH cluster in 5 critical States to improve on coordination and communication at State level and with Juba. Presence of backup co-lead agency, and strengthen volunteer participation of key WASH partners in cluster coordination.

13 NGO CHF Round 1 Implementation by the WASH cluster from CHF 1st round is currently at 60% approx. CARE South Sudan PPA Approved Amount Quarterly Disb to NGO Q3 Amount Total % Disbursed Reported NGO Exp Amount 450, , , ,681 56% Medair 450, , , ,133 1% NHDF 400, , , , ,935 58% Intersos 749, , , ,688 22% Oxfam GB 999, , , ,688 64% ACF-USA 700, , , ,716 69% % Liquidated Solidarites Int 500, , , % GOAL 400, , , , ,062 63% NGO Total 4,649,864 1,631, ,902 1,855, ,903 42%

14 Allocations Round 2 Project Title Reduced Morbidity and Prevention of Malnutrition in South Sudan by Addressing Chronic and Acute Water, Hygiene, and Sanitation Needs of the Population Ayod Safe Drinking Water Systems and Sanitation Project Response to humanitarian needs of Water, Sanitation & Hygiene Services for returnees, IDPs and host communities in Warrap and Western Bahr el Ghazal States. Provision of Safe Water, adequate Sanitation and hygiene promotion to Vulnerable Persons in Areas Impacted by High Levels of Returns and Emergency WASH supplies to affected population by emergencies in South Sudan Provide WASH Emergency support to Returnees, IDPs and Vulnerable host Communities in Upper Nile state WASH Services Provision and Emergency Response in Northern Bahr-el-Ghazal State Project Budget (US$) Secured Funding/ Source (US$) Indirect Costs (%) PRT after revision $4,000,000 $1,400,000 25% $500,000 Target Areas (State/ county) Warrap (Twic and Gogrial West counties, including Warrap-Abyei border areas) Northern Bahr el Gazal (Aweil East, Aweil North counties and Aweil Town), No. of Direct CHF Beneficiaries $280,800 $30,150 9% $100,828 Jonglei State Ayod County 12,300 $800,000 $332,017 14% $399,894 Gogrial East and West, Warrap State 18,000 $5,264,974 $750,002 16% $400,000 Emergency Affected Populations' Conflict 100% in Upper Nile State- Renk County $655,000 $0 28% $149,956 Upper Nile( Nasir and Ulang Counties 2,572 $3,867,161 $326,496 8% $500,000 Northern Bahr el Ghazal State, Aweil North County, Awei East County 46,000 15,000 29,000 Emergency WASH Preparedness, Response and Coordination in South Sudan $21,479,200 $11,186,630 8% $4,500,546 Jonglei Pibor, Uror and other counties Upper Nile Fashoda, Maban, Melut, Renk and other counties Unity Mayom, Mayendit, Koch and other counties Warrap Twic and Gogrial West counties Northern Bahr el Ghazal Aweil North, Centre and East counties Other states where emergencies may arise 300,000 21% $450,203 Jonglei Uror, Ayod and Akobo West counties Upper Nile Fashoda, Maban, Melut, Renk and Nasira Unity Mayendit, Koch, and Panyijar counties Northern Bahr el Ghazal Aweil Town 50,000

15 Overview of Allocation Process in the cluster Submissions were checked against the CAP 2012 prioritisation, with a focus on the high priority ones; then against the WASH cluster strategies for CHF. The compliant ones were then reviewed and rated, and returned for clarification. Medium rated projects were then reviewed for Upper Nile state and low rated ones for Jonglei, to select some for required critical response therein. Per capita costs were calculated, but judgment was based on realistic costs of delivering the planned activities. The indirect costs and overheads were reviewed and rationalized with the different agencies. RANKING CRITERIA CAP MYR Rank Population vulnerability Geographical area Presence on the ground Participation in the Cluster Agency Capacity Value for money

16 Challenges in the process The time available for this process was inadequate. There was misunderstanding on the implications of the CAP budget, and major differences between the submissions and the FTS on funds received to date. The application of the definition of indirect costs as defined in the guidelines was difficult. Interpretation of guidelines in general.

17 How to do it better The secretariat to increase the timeframe dedicated for this process. Disseminate to the cluster membership information on the importance of correct CAP forecasts and updates, and the FTS. Work with the secretariat to agree and get full understanding of guidelines for submissions by cluster coordinators before adoption for use.

18 NEXT STEPS The WASH cluster has tried to be as objective and self-ruthless as possible during the peer review, so does not expect the need for a budget reduction. Since rates have already been well reviewed, the expected outputs on some projects would have to be reduced, in case of a budget cut. A budget cut will be translated in a considerable reduction of beneficiaries of WASH projects.

19 Monitoring Process The WASH cluster has an established monthly monitoring system through which member agencies submit progress on key indicators. This applies to the CHF, CERF and other funds. Monthly WASH cluster meetings in states also track progress in responding to humanitarian situations. There is a separate monitoring mechanism used for the core pipeline supplies. With the strengthening of the staffing capacity, joint monitoring visits will be arranged with the partners and possibly government.

20