October 7, 2011 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription

1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY DAVIS. IRVINE. LOS ANGELES. MERCED. RIVERSIDE. SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ 1111 Franklin Street Oakland, California Phone; (510) Fax:(510) October 7, 2011 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA I am pleased to provide the enclosed report on the implementation of RE-89, the Regental resolution passed on September 20, 2007, requiring special review, approval, and reporting procedures for proposals to obtain research funding from the tobacco industry. Under RE-89, the President is to prepare and submit to The Regents an annual report summarizing the number of proposals submitted to the scientific review committee established by each campus pursuant to RE-89, the number approved, and the number funded, along with a description or abstract of each proposal. To that end, my office asked each campus to provide this data, along with additional related information. The campus responses are summarized in the enclosed report and are included in the Appendix. Through the end of FY 2011, no campus reported having had any new research proposals or new research awards from a tobacco industry sponsor. Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns about the enclosed report. With best wishes, I am, Sincerely, yours, Enclosures Mark G. Yudof President cc: Chancellors

2 ! PRESIDENT'S REPORT TO THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF ".. ', ' \' " REGENTS: FY 2011 REPORT ON PROPOSALS SEEKING RESEARCH FUNDlNG FROM THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY, BACKGROUND On September 20,2007, the Board of Regents approved RE';;89, a resolution put forward by the Committee on Finance, requiring Chancellors to adopt special review, approval, and reporting procedures 'for proposals to obtain research funding from the tobacco industry. The adopted resolution replaced an earlier version ofre-89 (which,would have restricted University acceptance of such funding). The full text of RE-89, as' adopted, can be found starting on Page 37 of the September 20, 2007 approved Regents Minutes found at:. ' uni versityofcalifomia.edulregents/minutes/2007 Ibmlrd907.pdf. RE_89 directs each Chancellor to 'establish a policy requiring that prior to the submission of any proposal to seek research funding from the tobacco industry, the research proposal must be reviewed by a scientific ~eview committee designated by the Chancellor for this purpose, and that the proposal must be approved by the Chancellor prior to submission. RE-89 requires that The Regents. shall receive timely notice of such grants and a description of the research to be undertaken,: and that for' each proposal reviewed, The. Regents shall receive a copy of the. scientific review committee's report and a copy of the Chancellor's determination letter (stating whether the proposal is to be approved for submission, along with the rationale for the determination). Under RE-89, The Regents also directed the President to prepare and submit to The Regents "an annual report summarizing the number of proposals submitted to the scientific review committee, the number approved, and the number funded, along with a description or abstract of each pt;oposal." The reporting requiremen't is to be kept in place for at least five years,'after\vhich the President is to consult with The Regents to evaluate whether the reporting requirement should be continued. In September, 2008, the President submitted the first annual report to the Regents, including not only specific data about proposals seeking research funding from the tobacco industry, but also. information about systemwide advice that had been distributed to help each campus implement RE-89 and information about the steps each campus had taken to implement the new review and approval procedures. As reported FY 2009, all, ten University of California campuses' adopted policies and/or procedures to implement RE-89., Provided below and in the attached Appendix. is data reg~rding proposals seeking research funding from the tobacco industry'as well as research funding received from the tobacco industry for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1,2010 through June 30, 2011). RE-89 Implementatiori Report - 09/30/11 Page'l.

3 CAMPUS DATA For the reporting period (July 1,2010 through June 30, 2011), no campus reported having a research project that underwent a special scientific review as established under RE-89. Two campuses (Irvine and Los Angeles) reported a total of two ongoing tobacco-industry funded research projects that were initiated prior to RE-89's passage. In all cases, these projects were originally funded by Philip Morris US The two projects amount to $2,883,471 in funding. The individual campus RE-89 implementation reports are attached in the Appendix to this report. RE-89 Implementation Report - 09/30/11 Page 2

4 ,. APPENDIX. CAMPUS RE-89. IMPL;EMENTATION JmPORTS FY 2011 (Jtily 1, June 30, 201l)

5 , '. (.,. ) I"'", RE~89 IMPLEMENTATIO'N::REPORT:. "~.", ~..' '. -.. "..,Division of Agricu1ture,an.d N~tural.... ResQnrces'{ANR)... '.,. '. '......,... - '... :... :....,.', :' ').. \ I".' I '.. ~, ~.,' '., C..' j

6 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year.2011 (July 1, June 30, 2011) Campus: Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources 1. I During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? NOlle Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor?' None...- C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? None 1. For anyresearch proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 2... \ '. Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this Ifyes-Ho:w C.:... Abstract tobacco.~pproyedby the, proposal '. much funding ; industry. Chancellor under. funded b~ a did this proposal, sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a,. of Chancellor's',jndustry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and. date of award)? 3. Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close, offy (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections I and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (Yes/No). Continuing industry projects begun before were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements C.... ("\. ~...." Lynn E. Deetz ~ S ". if) JZ. ~~. Office of ContracIB & Granta. '. A c~~~ Chancell~~s written d.ienn~io*,.~ vidg(or disapprovirig submission of. proposal to seek funding from... tobacc" indu f)' sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE:-:S9,. 2 We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal. following usual University,practice and applicable rules regardi~g publicre.cord... \ RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 10fl,

7 - \ 1' /..-".....' RE-89: IMPLEME]STATIONREPORT:. University of California, Berkeley. -- \' i "

8 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30,2011) Campus: Berkeley 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? NONE Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor? 1 NOT APPLICABLE C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? NOT APPLICABLE " 2. For any research proposals identified in tile previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 1, " : Title DeScription or Proposed Was this proposal Was this Ifyes::"":How ", Abstract toba,~co approved by the proposal 'much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal "' sponsor RE-89? (and date; tobacco ' receive from a " of Chancellor's industry tobac~o iiidustry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and" ' date of award)? " ' C Provide titles, sponsor, and award atllqunts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at" " your campus active as of close offy201o-11 (June 30, 2011). Include' not only awards captured in~ections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage, of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007). and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco; Amount Subject to RE-89 review?(y eslno). Continuing industry projects begun b40r~ 09/20/2007were no/subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements None C.... '-:', I A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE-89. i 2 We will request that detailed information aboot any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. ' RE-89 Campus Reporting Template' Pagel'ofl

9 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT: University of California, Davis

10 , " Campus RE-89 Implementat.ion for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30,2011) Campus: Dav~ ~, 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review~ommittee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industrysponsor?non~, Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor?1 N/ Ai C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor?' inl Ai <- 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirementsjor FY ); please provide the foliowing information 2, Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this lfyes~how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89?(and date to,bacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination),sponsor? sponsor (and' date ofaward)? N/~ N/~ N/~ N/~ N/~ ~ N/~ N/~ N/~ Nl~ N/~ ( 3. Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco indus!!)' sj)onsors at your campus active as of close offy (June 30, 2011). No awards were. active on June 30, 201~ Include not only awards' captured in sections -1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/apriroval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE~89 r~view? (YeslNo). Continuing industry projects begun,~before 09/20/2007wer~ nqt subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements', ' N/Al N/~ N/Al N/A! N/Al N/Al N/Al N/Al! I A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a' tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents; under RE-89. ' 2 We will request that'detailed infonnation about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following UsUal University ~ practice and applicable rules regarding publibecord. '.RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Pagelof 1

11 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT: - ~-. Unlversity of California, Irvine

12 Campus RE-89 Implementati9nfor Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30, 2011) Campus: UC Irvine 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, bow many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? None Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry. sponsor? 1 C. or those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? ) 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposalssubjeetto RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY 2010~11), please provide the followin~ information. 1.. Title c. Description or Abstract. Proposed tobacco industry sponsor Was this proposal approved by the Chancellor under RE-89? (and date of Chancellor's dete.rmin~tion) Was this proposal.funded by a tobacco industry spon~or? If yes-how much funding. did this proposal. reeeivejroma.. ' I.' ~obacco industry sponsor (and date of awa'rd)? 3. Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known. research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close of FY (June 30, 2011). Inc1tide not only a'yards cap~ed in sections J and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09120/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. ~. A Novel Nonselenocystenic Phospholipid Glutathione Peroxidase Mediating Oxidative Stress Serves as a Prognostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer C. Tobacco industry sponsor Phillip Morris USA Amount Subjectto RE-89 review? (Yes/No). Continuing projects begun before. 09/20/2007 were not subject to. RE-89 review/approval requirements.'. $$883, No... RE-89 Campus Reporting Template.. Page 1 of2.

13 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT: University of California, L,os Angeles.

14 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July It June 30, 2011) Campus: Los Angeles 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review commit~e to be establisbed under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? None Dftbose, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission. by the campus to a tobacco industry~ sponsor?l N/A. C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? N/A 2. For any researchproposals identified in the. previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information:!. Title Description or Proposed' Was this proposal Was this Ifyes~How Abstract tobacco. approved by the proposal mucbfunding industry Chaocellornnder funded by a did this proposal' sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a,: of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor"? sponsor,(anet date of award)? C. ~ 3. Provide titles, sponsor, and. award amounts tor all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close offy (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/ ), and therefore not subject to RE-89'g new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (Yes/No). Continuing industry projects begun before 09/20/2007 were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements UCLA Adolescent Philip 52,000,000. No - fundhig was reviewed in 2010 as 'reported Smoking Cessation Center Morris Project last yea~. USA funded through C. 1 A copy ofthecbancellors written detennination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher,the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed infonnationabout any unfunded research proposals be kept intemal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record., RE-89 Campus Reporting Template' Page J ofl

15 I. A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 2 of2

16 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT: University of C:aiifornia, Merced. \

17 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30,2011) Campus: Merced 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under~re-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? None Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor? 1 NA C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? NA 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information Z Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this If yes-how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and date of award)? C Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close offy (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (Yes/No). Continuing industry projects begun before were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements C.... I A copy of the Chancellor's written detennination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 1 of1

18 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT: U niversityof California, Riverside,'..

19 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year'2011(July 1,2010 -June 30; 2011) :.' - Campus: RIVERSIDE' ' A~ During FisCal Year 2011, bow' many researchproposais'(i(ariy) at your. campus were submitted to the scientific reviewcomniittee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to II tobacco industry sponsor? NONE "..'. '.. ' '.. '.' \ Ofthose, how many did the Chancellor approve for 'submission by the campus to atobacco industry sponsor?1 N/A.',... C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? N/A. ~.' -) '1'- 2. For any research proposals identified in the prev.iou~ section' above. (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for Fy' ), please provide the foliowinginformation 1 N/A... '.... '.., '.. \ '.' '\..." '.,. ' Title Description or Proposed'.. Was this proposal Was this Uyes-:How Abstract tobac~o : approved by 'the. proposal,much funding.: industry'. Chancellor under funded bya did this. prop()sal sponsor. RE-89? (and date tobacco receive Croma ( 'of Chancellor~s'". '. industry tobacco industry -., de!erniination): spoosor? sponsor (and..,.--.. date of award)? '.' J J.. C.. -,I... I.' 3. Provide titles, sponsor,~nd!lward amo~ts for,all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at yourcampus'active asofclose offy 201O-1l(June 30, 2011). NONE.... I Include not only awards ~aptured in sections 1 ~d 2 above; but alsoac~ve awards begun prior to passage of RE-89.(begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to ~'"89'snew review/approval, requirements. Title Tobacco Amount. Subject to ~89 rev~~w? (Y eslno). Continuing industry projects begun be!ore were not subject to sponsor : RE-89reviewlapprovalrequirements ~ ".',. r., C. 1 i... \~,... ' ~~C-h-an~~-e-llo-r-"s-wn-'-tt-en-d-' e-termination approviri g or qi~approying,~~bmi'ssion of a proposal to' seek funding from a -1 A-C-OP-y-O-f-th:-" tobacco industry'sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the'ucpresident, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record.. RE-89 Campus Reportillg Template Page l ofl

20 RE-89IMPLEMEN,TATION:,REPORT: ".'.'. ".,.. University of California, San ])iego

21 Campus RE-89 Im]!lementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30,2011) Campus: Univenity of California San Diego Prepared by Linda Collins, A VC Office of Contract & Grant Administration 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? 0 Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor? 1 NA C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? N A 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 2 Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this If yes-how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and date of award)? None to Report during FY 2011 C Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close of FY (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections I and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco industry Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (YeslNo). Continuing sponsor projects begun before 09/20/2007 were not subject to RE-89 review/approval requirements None to Report during FY 2011 C. 1 A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 1 ofl

22 RE-89 IMPLEMENTATION :REpORT:... U niversityof'california, SanFr~ncisco...,"",,';... - ;'.'-".,

23 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30,2011) Campus: San Francisco 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? 0 Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor? 1 0 C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? 0 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 2 Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this If yes-how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and date of award)? c Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close of FY (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (Yes/No). Continuing industry projects begun before 09/20/2007 were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements C... I A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 1 of1

24 \, '".. '~". '. RE~89IMPLEMENTATION REPORT:. UniversityofCalifornia,Santa>lIarbara... ""....

25 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30, 2011) Campus: Santa Barbara 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? In FY 2011 UCSB submitted no proposals requiring review under RE-89. Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor?1 N/A C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? NI A 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 2 Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this If yes-how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and date of award)? C Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close offy (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (YeslNo). Continuing industry projects begun before 09/20/2007 were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements C A copy of the Chancellor's written determination approving or disapproving submission of a proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 10(1

26 ,: RE-89 IMPLEMEN,TATIONRE,PORT:,., University of California, Santa Cruz.. ~, '

27 Campus RE-89 Implementation for Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, June 30, 2011) Campus: Santa Cruz 1. During Fiscal Year 2011, how many research proposals (if any) at your campus were submitted to the scientific review committee to be established under RE-89, for review prior to submission to a tobacco industry sponsor? None. Of those, how many did the Chancellor approve for submission by the campus to a tobacco industry sponsor?1 N/A C. Of those, how many were funded by a tobacco industry sponsor? N/ A 2. For any research proposals identified in the previous section above (i.e., any research proposals subject to RE-89's review/approval requirements for FY ), please provide the following information 2 Title Description or Proposed Was this proposal Was this If yes-how Abstract tobacco approved by the proposal much funding industry Chancellor under funded by a did this proposal sponsor RE-89? (and date tobacco receive from a of Chancellor's industry tobacco industry determination) sponsor? sponsor (and date of award)? C Provide titles, sponsor, and award amounts for all known research awards from tobacco industry sponsors at your campus active as of close of FY (June 30, 2011). Include not only awards captured in sections 1 and 2 above, but also active awards begun prior to passage of RE-89 (begun before 09/20/2007), and therefore not subject to RE-89's new review/approval requirements. Title Tobacco Amount Subject to RE-89 review? (Yes/N 0). Continuing industry projects begun before 09/20/2007 were not subject to sponsor RE-89 review/approval requirements C.... IA copy of the Chancellor's written detenrunation approving or disapproving submission ofa proposal to seek funding from a tobacco industry sponsor is to have been sent to the researcher, the UC President, and the Regents, under RE We will request that detailed information about any unfunded research proposals be kept internal, following usual University practice and applicable rules regarding public record. RE-89 Campus Reporting Template Page 1 ofl