SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Similar documents
AD HOC Committee for Transit To Start Immediately After Management and Finance Committee

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

AGENDA. 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of October 18, 2017 ACTION State Transportation Improvement Program ACTION Funding Recommendations

Cancellation. November.

AGENDA. 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of November 15, 2017 ACTION. 9. Updates / Requests from the Committee

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. Senate Bill 1 (SB1) State Funding Strategy for U.S. 101 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane and Parallel Projects

2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program

Meeting Agenda Thursday, September 6, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15

Regional Planning Partnership

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Long Range Transportation Plan

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Special Meeting Agenda

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

Meeting Agenda Thursday, March 1, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m.

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

San Francisco County Transportation Authority Proposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

Intentional blank page. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, :00 PM

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

INTRODUCTION... 1 OVERVIEW... 2 SECTION I: FUND LISTING AND ELIGIBILITY CHART... 5 SECTION II: FUNDING SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS... 8

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: August 21, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 9

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Fiscal Year 2017/18 Final Draft April 19, 2017

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

ATTACHMENT B. Opportunities to Implement Measure M Through New and Expanded State and Federal Transportation Funding Programs

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, :00 PM

FISCAL YEAR OVERALL WORK PROGRAM

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Key Topics: Legislative Requirements. 2. Legislative Intent and Application to San Francisco

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Funding the plan. STBG - This program is designed to address specific issues

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

Public Participation Plan

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

LPA Programs How They Work

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

Understanding the. Program

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

MINUTES WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) NOVEMBER 18, :15 P.M. FIFTH FLOOR, PUBLIC MEETING ROOM, BRYCE A

Chapter 8. Glossary and Index. Chapter 8

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Transportation Improvement Program

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

Plans and Programs Committee: Commissioners Campos (Chair), Chu (Vice Chair), Avalos, Chiu, Wiener and Mirkarimi (Ex Officio)

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Transcription:

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SJCOG Conference Room 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 Thursday, October 8, 2015 10:00 A.M. Teleconference Number:(650) 479-3208 Participant Code: 800 954 745 The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at (209) 235-0600 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. PARKING: For your convenience, parking is available at the COG Regional Center. There is additional parking available at Public Parking Lot K, located on American Street, just south of Weber Avenue. Additional meter parking is available on Weber Avenue. 1. Call to Order / Introductions / Roll Call 2. Minutes: September 10, 2015 A G E N D A 3. Public Presentation At this time, the public may address the Technical Advisory Committee on any non-agendized item that is within the subject matter of this agency. If a member of the public wishes to speak on an agenda item he or she is invited to address the Technical Advisory Committee at the time the item is up for consideration. A five-minute maximum time limit for a speaker will apply to all items from the audience. The determination of whether an item is within the subject matter of the Committee is a discretionary decision to be made by the chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. 4. Technical Items: B through C are available for action by the committee. The left hand column identifies only recommendations from staff. Action Presentation Discussion A. Consent Calendar Item: D through F B. Commute Connection New Multi-Modal Commute Trip Planning System Demostration - McNickle C. 2015 Regional Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) Policy Considerations - Nguyen

CONSENT CALENDAR Action Action Action D. 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding Recommendations for Fiscal Years 2016/2017, 2017/2018, and 2018/2019 Ripperda E. 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program Ripperda F. 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment #2, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis Taylor 5. Other Matters of Business 6. Meeting Adjourned to Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

1. Call Meeting to Order/Introductions: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E Weber Ave. Stockton, CA 95202 Thursday, September 10, 2015 MINUTES Charles Swimley called the meeting to order at 10:01 a.m. and introductions were made. Committee Members Present: Charles Swimley City of Lodi Zabih Zaca City of Tracy Cindy Erdman City of Stockton Robin Borre City of Stockton Wes Johnson City of Stockton Michael King City of Lathrop Phil Carlson City of Escalon Tracie Madison City of Manteca James Pease City of Ripon Paula Fernandez City of Lodi Steven Martinez Caltrans, District 10 Josh Swearingen Caltrans, District 10 Mark Houghton City of Manteca George Lorente SJRTD Nate Knodt SJRTD Dero In SJRTD Brian Schimdt SJRRC Bob Schiffler SJRRC Shelehia Meisner SJRRC John Andoh City of Escalon Committee Members Not Present: Dameon Flores City of Lathrop Todd Greenwood City of Stockton Eric Alvarez City of Stockton Mike McDowell City of Stockton David Stagnaro City of Stockton James Wong City of Stockton Karla Cervantes City of Stockton Ian Turner Stockton Metropolitan Airport Ronald Elliott Stockton Metropolitan Airport Ed Lovell City of Tracy

Khoder Baydoun City of Tracy Dorothy Kam City of Lodi Juan Villanueva Port of Stockton Kevin Werner City of Ripon Georgia Lantberger City of Manteca Nabil Hasan Caltrans, District 10 Parminder Singh Caltrans, District 10 Tom Dumas Caltrans, District 10 Nicholas Fung Caltrans, District 10 Harry Mavrogenes Stockton Metropolitan Airport Darell In SJRTD John Cadrett SJVAPCD Mahmoud Sagga San Joaquin County Mike Selling San Joaquin County Dave Mendoza San Joaquin County Firoz Vohra San Joaquin County Mahmoud Sagga San Joaquin County SJCOG Staff Present: Diane Nguyen Kim Anderson Ryan Niblock Stephanie Maynard Daniel Meza David Ripperda Jonathan Spencer Melody Lin Katy Castro Deputy Director Senior Regional Planner Senior Regional Planner Administrative Analyst Assistant Regional Planner Assistant Regional Planner Assistant Regional Planner Assistant Regional Planner Administrative Clerk 2. Meeting minutes from August 13, 2015: It was moved/seconded (Fernandez/ Schmidt) to approve minutes from August 13, 2015. Motion passed unanimously by voice vote. 3. Public Presentation: None. 4. B. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: Ms. Lin stated that SJCOG staff is currently coordinating with staff from the other 7 Valley MPOs and the Air District to develop a series of workshops to help potential FY 15/16 and beyond AHSC program applicants. The workshops will be some time in October 2015. SJCOG Staff anticipates ARB to release its draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Investment Plan in September 2015.

C. 2015 Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) Policy Considerations: Mr. Niblock stated that SJCOG staff is in the process of finalizing projected transit capital and operating expenses over a 10-year period, as well as anticipated revenues. Current information indicates that transit needs for regional transit operations exceed anticipated revenue. As a result, the RTSP will make recommendations on funding. Mr. Houghton commented that the CMAQ policy is not going to be favored on the transportation, street and roads, side. Ms. Fernandez and Mr. Lorente commented that their transit agencies rely on the CMAQ funds and would like to have a dedicated resource of CMAQ funds specific to transit. D. Annual Demographic Update and Regional Economic Indicators Symposium State of the Northern San Joaquin Valley: Ms. Anderson stated that this year SJCOG and UOP have decided to combine these efforts, with UOP having received sponsorship from Chase Bank to offset expenses. The regional event is scheduled at the Waterfront Hotel in Stockton on October 13, 2015 from 8:00 am to 11:15 am. Ms. Anderson commented on the Stockton Metropolitan Airport Public Open House and Workshop on September 14 th. from 6pm to 8pm. E. Fiscal Year 16/17 Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Grant Program: Mr. Ripperda stated that Caltrans has released a call for FY 16/17 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Applications. A total of $9.8 million is available for transportation planning projects statewide. Grant applications are due October 30, 2015. Caltrans District 10 will be holding a workshop to provide information on the grant program on Tuesday, September 15 th from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. F. Federal Project Delivery Status: Mr. Niblock stated since the August 2015 TAC meeting, three additional projects with RSTP funding have been obligated, and one project with both CMAQ and RSTP funding was obligated. To date, these additional authorizations bring the region s obligation authority delivery for CMAQ and RSTP projects up to 114 percent. 5. Other Matters of Business: Mr. Zaca asked SJCOG staff, to hold the meeting via conference when there are only information items to discuss. Ms. Nguyen stated that the option is available to all committee members. 6. Adjournment: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:27 a.m. to Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

October 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Commute Connection New Multi-Modal Commute Trip Planning System Demonstration Info only, Presentation DISCUSSION: SUMMARY: The Commute Connection program staff is pleased to introduce a new system to help commuters find a better way of commuting. The Program has operated a ridematching system to promote the use of alternative transportation options such as carpooling, vanpooling and using transit for San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties. The new system provides the user the opportunity to view side-by-side comparisons of various modes, including biking and walking--all from a single source. The innovative tool includes better information on inter-jurisdictional travel mode alternatives to help encourage commuters switch from driving alone to alternate modes, with the ultimate goal of reducing traffic congestion and improve air quality. BACKGROUND In 2013, the SJCOG Board accepted the analysis and recommendations of an Interregional Multi-Modal Commute Trip Planning Study to develop a web-based trip planning system to promote alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) commuting. The study concluded that no single information source with all commute alternatives existed. This provided the opportunity to enhance Commute Connection s existing system to respond to the changing needs and advances in technology. The new system will achieve the following: Integrate all modes into a single, convenient, accessible system Engage commuters and employers with personalization, incentives and challenges Provide local governments and the community with data and information Serve as a resource to employers subject to Air District Trip Reduction Rule 9410 Provide staff with a powerful administration and management tool to assess performance Prepared by: Yvette Davis, Senior Regional Planner

October 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2015 Regional Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) Policy Considerations Discussion SUMMARY: San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) staff has completed the process of cataloguing transit capital and operating expenses over a 10-year period, as well as anticipated revenues. The data indicates that transit needs for regional transit operations exceed anticipated revenue. As such, the RTSP reviews existing revenue sources, and determines the potential effect of funding policy adjustments on overall transit revenue. BACKGROUND: The 2015 RTSP is the first, 10-year step toward implementing the long-range regional transit vision in the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Anticipated transit costs in the San Joaquin region over a 10-year period have been catalogued and are being compared with the anticipated funding need. The result will be a complete transit funding outlook for San Joaquin County. From the data it is apparent that the transit funding need of the region exceeds anticipated revenues. Based on this finding, not only is it important for the RTSP to explore the best ways to distribute future transit funding throughout the region, it is essential that existing funding and established policies be reexamined to ensure that the County s transit demands can be met. Last month, conceptual policy considerations have been discussed with the SJCOG committees. These conceptual policy considerations included: Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Assessment of a Community Share of RTD and ACE services Stockton Urbanized Area (UZA) funding split Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) designation Designated Recipient for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds The committees asked for precise numbers in order to evaluate financial impacts to jurisdictions from policy scenarios. In response to this, SJCOG has provided the potential effects of the conceptual policy considerations on transit revenues in Attachment A to this report.

NEXT STEPS October 21, 2015: November: Late December/January: February 25, 2016: SJCOG Board workshop on October 21 st, 2015 from 7:30am to 9:00am to update the Board on the RTSP, committee input to date, and feedback from SJCOG Board on policy scenarios. This workshop will be open to all members of the public. Interagency Transit Committee continues to review chapters and working documents for development of the administrative draft of the RTSP; continued policy refinement on RTSP through SJCOG Committees and Board. Release of public review Draft RTSP. SJCOG Board adoption of RTSP. RECOMMENDATION: Provide input and direction to SJCOG staff on policy elements. All input received will be used to shape the discussion and recommendations presented in the draft RTSP. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. The Regional Transit Systems Plan is anticipated to bring forward funding policy recommendations that will have direct fiscal impacts. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Quantified Effects of Conceptual Policy Considerations on Transit Revenues Exhibit B: San Joaquin County Population Projections Prepared by: Diane Nguyen, Deputy Director, Ryan Niblock, Senior Regional Planner

Exhibit A: Quantified Effects of Conceptual Policy Considerations on Transit Revenues Local Transportation Fund FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT The RTSP considers a scenario where the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (SJRRC) LTF apportionment is increased to $4,000,000 per year. Table 1 below summarizes the effect of this adjustment on other LTF apportionments. Table 1: LTF Apportionments after SJRRC Adjustment LTF Recipient FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Apportionment Apportionment Difference SJRRC $700,209 $4,000,000 $3,299,791 RTD $13,883,531 $11,983,723 ($1,899,808) Escalon $240,662 $203,955 ($36,707) Lathrop $631,479 $561,288 ($70,191) Lodi $2,098,196 $1,801,549 ($296,647) Manteca $2,331,644 $2,062,763 ($268,881) Ripon $485,432 $420,449 ($64,983) Stockton $0 $0 $0 Tracy $2,802,048 $2,409,934 ($392,114) Unincorporated $763,298 $669,239 ($94,059) Community Share of Regional Bus Transit (RTD) and Rail Transit (ACE) Services The concept of the Community Share cost of RTD and SJRRC services is under consideration. SJCOG staff is in the process of working with the Interagency Transit Committee in developing methodology for a Community Share of costs. As a scenario for discussion purposes, FTA 5307 apportionments were presented for consideration as the funding source in Community Share calculations. Table 2: FTA 5307 Funds for FY 14/15 FTA 5307 Recipient FY 14/15 Apportionment Lodi UZA $1,494,685 Manteca UZA $2,107,827 Stockton UZA $7,241,307 Tracy UZA $1,813,086

Stockton Urbanized Area (FTA 5307) FTA 5307 funds apportioned to the Stockton UZA are split between RTD and SJRRC. Table 3 illustrates the existing 71:29 split of these funds, as well as a conceptual 80:20 split. Table 3: Stockton UZA FTA 5307 Recipient FY 14/15 Apportionment (with 71:29 Split) FY 14/15 Apportionment (with 80:20 Split) Difference SJRRC $2,099,979 $1,448,261 ($651,718) RTD $5,141,328 $5,793,046 $651,718 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program The concept of designating a minimum set percentage of CMAQ funds for all transit projects is under consideration. In this scenario, transit projects compete with transit projects for 50% of the CMAQ funds. One those are ranked, other transit projects which do not secure funding from this 50% transit category can then compete with the non-transit projects in the remaining 50% of CMAQ funds. Table 4 shows annual CMAQ apportionments, and the designation of 50 percent of CMAQ funds for Transit Projects. Table 4: CMAQ Project Type Annual CMAQ Apportionment 50% for Transit Transit $4,857,105 $9,714,209 All Other Projects $4,857,105

Consolidated Transit Services Agency The concept of designating RTD the CTSA for the region is discussed in the RTSP. Such a designation would result in an up to five percent (maximum) off the top apportionment to RTD. Table 5 summarizes the effect of this adjustment on other LTF apportionments, assuming that $4,000,000 is also taken off the top for SJRRC. Table 5: LTF Apportionment Adjustments after CTSA Designation LTF Recipient FY 14/15 FY 15/16 Apportionment Apportionment Difference SJRRC $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 RTD $11,983,723 $12,390,182 $406,459 Escalon $203,955 $193,757 ($10,198) Lathrop $561,288 $533,224 ($28,064) Lodi $1,801,549 $1,711,472 ($90,077) Manteca $2,062,763 $1,959,625 ($103,138) Ripon $420,449 $399,427 ($21,022) Stockton $0 $0 $0 Tracy $2,409,934 $2,289,437 ($120,497) Unincorporated $669,239 $635,777 ($33,462) Designated Recipient of Stockton Urbanized Area The concept of SJCOG being identified as the Designated Recipient for all FTA funding apportionments in the region is under discussion in the RTSP. Currently, San Joaquin RTD is the Designated Recipient for the Stockton Urbanized Area FTA 5307 funding. Such a change in designation would not have an impact on total funding levels. However, the duties of programming funds and allocating to projects would become SJCOG responsibility.

Exhibit B:

October 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: DISCUSSION: 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding Recommendations for Fiscal Years 2016/2017, 2017/2018, and 2018/2019. Recommend the SJCOG Board approve the 2015 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Project Funding Recommendations OVERVIEW: The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) has completed the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Project Selection Process. An Active Transportation Multidisciplinary Committee was established, per state guidelines, which reviewed the projects and developed a programming recommendation for the $2.9 million in available ATP funds. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the SJCOG Board approve the Scoring Committee s 2015 ATP Cycle 2 funding recommendation for Fiscal Years 2016/2017, 2017/2018, and 2018/2019, as identified in Attachment A. Included in the funding recommendation is also a contingency list of four projects in the event of cost savings or a non-deliverable project from the funded list. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the 2015 ATP funding will result in $2.9 million to be programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). BACKGROUND: What is the Active Transportation Program? The Active Transportation Program (ATP) was created in 2013 by Senate Bill 99 and Assembly Bill 101 to promote the increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking & walking. The ATP consolidates funding from the federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), the federal Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, the state Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program, and the state Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA). Consistent with the federal TAP requirements, the ATP Guidelines distribute the total annual funding capacity between three

separate programs with 10% going to small urban/rural areas with populations of 200,000 or less, 40% going to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urban areas with populations greater than 200,000 and 50% going to a statewide program. All funding must be competitively awarded with the requirement that 25% of the funds in each program benefit disadvantaged communities. The ATP has two separate grant processes one led by the State and the other led by the nine large MPOs including SJCOG. Previous 2014 ATP Cycle 1 In 2014, the SJCOG board approved using $50,000 in Measure K funds to provide consultant assistance to local jurisdictions for applications for the first ATP Cycle. 29 applications were submitted by San Joaquin County jurisdictions, among 770 applications statewide that requested a total of over $1 billion. Four projects from the City of Stockton received approximately $3 million from the statewide portion of the ATP. During the regional portion of the ATP, the SJCOG Board approved eight projects from the cities of Lathrop, Lodi, Ripon, Stockton, Tracy, and the County of San Joaquin to receive a combination of $2.97 million in ATP funds and $1.5 million of Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds. The SJCOG Board approved using these RSTP funds from the 25% SJCOG regional share to supplement the limited ATP funds available. The CTC adopted these recommendations on November 12, 2014. 2015 ATP Cycle 2 For ATP Cycle 2, no discretionary funding was available to provide consultant assistance or to supplement the regional ATP funding set aside for SJCOG. SJCOG staff offered technical assistance to local jurisdictions for the preparation of grant applications, including providing mapping support and providing assistance related to Disadvantaged Communities and census data. As shown in Exhibit A, 16 applications from the region were part of the 617 applications statewide which competed for approximately $180 million in statewide ATP funds. These 617 applications requested a total of over $1 billion. The City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin were the only local jurisdictions to submit ATP applications for Cycle 2. Statewide ATP Cycle 2 Funding Results The California Transportation Commission staff have recommended $396,000 in statewide ATP funding for the City of Stockton s Greater Downtown Active Transportation Plan. This recommendation will be tentative until formally adopted by the CTC on October 22. Regional ATP Cycle 2 Funding Recommendation SJCOG considered all of the applications submitted in the State level competitive process for the supplemental regional funding opportunity. SJCOG also held a supplemental call for projects for the regional funding pool of $2.9 million from June 1 to July 31; no additional project applications (not previously submitted to the state process) were received.

As required by the State ATP Guidelines, SJCOG formed a multi-disciplinary committee to assist in the project selection process, the format of which was approved by the SJCOG Board in May 2015. On Tuesday September 22, the scoring committee convened and reviewed all 16 projects. Table 1: 2015 ATP Cycle 2 Multidisciplinary Advisory Scoring Committee Membership Name Organization Title Expertise San Joaquin County Senior Deputy Director Barb Alberson Public Health Public Health Services Policy & Planning Director of Infill Development, David Garcia Ten Space Development Community Development Bike/Ped Advocacy Research and Grant San Joaquin County Nou Hendricks Development SRTS Grants Office of Education Program Manager Craig Hoffman City of Lodi Senior Planner Land Use Planning San Joaquin Regional Transit Operations George Lorente Grants Manager Transit District and Grants Katelyn Environmental Justice Disadvantaged Catholic Charities Roedner Sutter Program Manager Communities Deputy Greg Showerman City of Manteca Civil Engineering Public Works Director Kristine Williams San Joaquin Bike Coalition Executive Director Bicycle Advocacy The Scoring committee evaluated project merits by examining the following: Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking; Increase the safety and mobility of non-motorized users; Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals as established pursuant to SB 375; Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity, through the use of programs including but not limited to projects eligible for Safe Routes to School Program funding; Projects that are either in large urban, small urban or rural areas. Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program; and Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users. Increase walking and bicycling through targeted strategies: increasing access to transit services, increasing access to schools, eliminating gaps or removing barriers in the bicycle/pedestrian network, and completing facilities Reduce the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries Identification of the community-based public participation process that culminated in the project proposal, which may include noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders. Improve public health through the targeting of populations with high risk factors for obesity, physical inactivity, asthma or other health issues Provides benefit to a disadvantaged community and includes project features that provide a direct benefit for members of this community (one quarter of the region s ATP funds must be spent in a disadvantaged community). Use of the California Conservation Corps

Exhibit A: Active Transportation Program Process

Average project scores were generated by gathering the eight final scores, omitting the high and low scores for each project, and averaging the remaining six scores. The resulting ranked list is shown in Attachment A. Due to the limited amount of ATP funds that were available, the scoring committee recommended only the highest ranked project be funded, the City of Stockton s Miner Avenue Complete Streets Improvements project. Attachment B provides additional information describing this project. As the original funding request exceeds the amount of ATP funding available, City of Stockton staff have indicated that they can provide local funds to make up the $41,000 difference. In addition, the scoring committee, determined the next four projects on the scoring list will make up the contingency project list for this ATP cycle as shown in Attachment A. SJCOG staff supports the Multidisciplinary Scoring Committee s recommendations, including the contingency list, and recommends consideration for approval. NEXT STEPS/SCHEDULE: CTC adopts Statewide ATP projects October 22, 2015 SJCOG board adopts Regional ATP projects October 22, 2015 MPO project recommendations due to CTC November 15, 2015 CTC adopts MPO project recommendations December 10, 2015 ATTACHMENTS: A. Regional ATP Project Ranked Scores and Funding Recommendations B. Miner Avenue Complete Streets Improvements Project Summary Prepared By: David Ripperda, Assistant Regional Planner

Attachment A Regional ATP Cycle 2 Projects Ranked by Average Score Jurisdiction Project Name Score Rank Request Recommended Stockton Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvements 83.42 1 $2,939,000 $2,898,000 Stockton Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Improvements 79.33 2 $1,788,000 *Contingency Project List Stockton *Recommended by Active Transportation Plan in Greater Downtown 77.83 3 $396,000 CTC for Statewide District Funding Stockton East Bay MUD Corridor Class I Bicycle & Pedestrian Path *Contingency Project 76.83 4 $1,266,000 Improvements List Stockton Accessible Pedestrian Signal at Various Locations 76.33 5 $699,000 *Contingency Project List *Contingency Project List Stockton El Dorado Street Bike and Pedestrian Access Improvements 75.17 6 $1,778,000 Stockton Pedestrian Safety Action Plan 73.17 7 $300,000 - Stockton Ryde Pedestrian Bridge ADA and Safety Retrofit 72.92 8 $1,307,000 - Stockton Safe Routes to School Pilot Program Phase 3 72.08 9 $550,000 - Stockton Pedestrian Crossing Improvements at Pershing/Argonne and Victory Park Sidewalk 71.50 10 $1,090,000 - Stockton Calaveras River Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge Rehabilitation 71.33 11 $251,000 - Stockton Bear Creek & Pixley Slough Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 68.25 12 $1,480,000 - Stockton Traffic Safety Awareness Program 67.08 13 $300,000 - San Joaquin County Elmwood Elementary School Access Improvements 66.58 14 $1,772,000 - San Joaquin County San Joaquin County Woodbridge School Access Improvements 62.08 15 $289,000 - Bicycle Master Plan Update 61.00 16 $400,000 - Total Recommended: $2,898,000

Attachment B Miner Avenue Complete Street Improvement Project In Fiscal Year 2009/2010, the City of Stockton and the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission were awarded a Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant from Caltrans to prepare the Miner Avenue Streetscape Plan (MASP). The purpose of the MASP was to develop a comprehensive design for the corridor that establishes Miner Avenue as a prominent complete street, emphasizing pedestrian amenities and multimodal transportation between the Robert J. Cabral Rail Station and the Weber Point Events Center. The plan also included recommendations for future building locations, proposed land uses, and façade enhancement guidelines to activate the street with pedestrian-oriented storefronts, signage, and lighting. In Spring 2014, the SJCOG Board awarded Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funds to the City of Stockton for their Bus Rapid Transit Phase 1B project, which includes replacing the traffic signal at the Miner Avenue and Sutter Street intersection with a roundabout consistent with the MASP. In 2014 the City of Stockton submitted an application during the first cycle of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for funding to complete the environmemental and design phases for complete street improvements to the nine-block Miner Avenue Corridor. Recognizing the future potential of this project, in September 2014 the SJCOG Board approved allocating $861,000 in federal funds for the environmental phase of this project. In Fall 2014, VCOR, LP, a partnership between Visionary Homebuilders and Ten Space Development, proposed to construct an affordable housing and retail project called Grand View Village on Miner Avenue. This project competed for state Affordable Housing and Sustainable Community funds in 2015, however it was not selected for funding and is anticipated to be resubmitted in 2016 for consideration. As a part of the project, VCOR is proposing to construct a portion of the Miner Avenue improvements. In Spring 2015, the City of Stockton submitted an application for the second cycle of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) to allow the completion of design and construction of the first two blocks of the Miner Avenue Complete Street improvements between Center Street and Hunter Street. The improvements will include removing one traffic lane in each direction, adding a landscaped median, Class II bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and replacing the diagonal parking with parallel parking.

CENTER ST EL DORADO ST HUNTER ST SAN JOAQUIN ST SUTTER ST CALIFORNIA ST AMERICAN ST STANISLAUS ST GRANT ST AURORA ST CMAQ Funded FY 16/17 Existing Aerial Plan Phase 1 ATP Cycle 2 Phase 2 ATP Cycle 3 Improvements Proposed to be Constructed by VCOR, LP using Affordable Housing Sustainable Community (AHSC) Funds Proposed Complete Streets Plan Existing Street View Typical Proposed Street Cross Section Rendered Street View of Proposed Complete Streets Improvement

October 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program Approve 2016 STIP SUMMARY: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) will consider the 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for adoption in March 2016. SJCOG is required to submit our region s programming priorities to CTC in the form of the 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) by December 15, 2015. The 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts there is zero programming capacity available. Therefore, no new projects may be added to the STIP and some existing projects will need to be delayed to later years in which there is funding capacity; however, no existing STIP projects are in danger of losing their funding. SJCOG staff have prepared programming recommendations for the 2016 STIP in coordination with the other seven Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the San Joaquin Valley. This coordination explores ways to keep existing STIP projects (already programmed) from being delayed. One approach is identifying opportunities where one agency s delay can help leverage programming capacity and keep another project on schedule. RECOMMENDED ACTION: SJCOG staff recommends the TAC approve the proposed programming recommendations. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. There is no new funding in the STIP and the action reflects schedule changes only. Specifically, there are no STIP dollar amount changes for existing programmed projects. BACKGROUND: In August 2015, SJCOG staff informed the SJCOG committees and Board of the challenges facing the State Transportation Improvement Program. The STIP is a funding program that covers a five-year period and is updated every two years. In the last two STIP cycles, SJCOG had available, in each cycle, $25 million (approximately) for programming to various transportation projects. The California Transportation Commission (and Caltrans) has notified regional agencies that the reduction in gasoline excise taxes has resulted in an adverse impact on STIP revenue. The 2016 STIP Fund Estimate as adopted by the CTC forecasts zero programming capacity. Therefore, no new projects may be added to the STIP; many of the existing projects will need to be reprogrammed to years where there is funding capacity available. STIP Reprogramming is not a choice, but a must.

The STIP revenue forecasts further shows there is no ability to meet the existing, programmed commitments of the 2014 STIP. Projects are over-committed against the revenue/cash flow available and again, will need to be pushed back. Existing Commitments of RTIP Funding The 2014 STIP funded projects to be carried over to the 2016 STIP/RTIP include: Project Sponsor Project Title Existing STIP Funding 2014 STIP Programming Year Proposed 2016 STIP Programming Year Lodi SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements $3,061,000 2017/18 2018/19 Manteca SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange $12,300,000 2018/19 2018/19 Ripon Stockton Avenue Widening $1,000,000 2016/17 2017/18 Tracy MacArthur Drive Widening (Schulte Road to Valpico Road) $3,194,000 2015/16 2016/17 SBCAG Carpenteria Creek-Sycamore Creek Route 101 HOV Lanes (in Santa Barbara County) 1 $8,853,000 2018/19 2018/19 SJCOG Planning, Programming, and Monitoring TOTAL = $29,008,000 $600,000 Multiple Multiple 1 In November 2012, the SJCOG Board approved the revenue neutral exchange of $8.853 million in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP shares with $8.853 million in State and Local Partnership Program (SLPP) from the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG). This action included the prioritization of the programming of an $8.8 million project for SBCAG in SJCOG s 2014 RTIP. Through this exchange SJCOG was able to immediately exchange the $8.853 million of SBCAG s SLPP funds for $8.853 million of Measure K Renewal funds committed to the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project. The SJCOG Board subsequently included in their action the dedication of the $8.853 million in Measure K Renewal funds freed from the State Route 99 South Stockton Widening project to fully fund the construction of the County of San Joaquin s Lower Sacramento Road Widening (Pixley Slough to Harney Curve) project. NEXT STEPS/SCHEDULE The following are the major actions and dates remaining for the completion of the 2016 STIP: August 27, 2015: STIP Fund Estimate and Guidelines adopted by CTC. October 15, 2015: Caltrans submits its draft ITIP (Interregional Improvement Program) to the CTC November 19, 2015: SJCOG Board scheduled to adopt 2016 RTIP (this is the formal planning document that identifies 2016 STIP projects) December 15, 2015: STIPs (Final ITIP and RTIP) are due to the CTC February 19, 2016: CTC staff releases its recommendations March 17, 2016: Following public hearings on January 21 and 26th, the CTC is scheduled to adopt the STIP. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Projects Prepared By: Ryan Niblock, Senior Regional Planner and David Ripperda, Assistant Regional Planner

Summary of 2016 RTIP Projects San Joaquin Council of Governments 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program Project and Funding Summary Existing 2014 Regional Improvement Program ($1,000s) PPNO Title Sponsor TOTAL PRIOR 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 PAED PSE RW SUP CON SUP RW CON 3045 SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements Lodi, City of 3,061 0 0 0 0 3,061 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,061 3046 SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Manteca, City of 12,300 0 0 0 0 0 12,300 0 0 0 0 0 12,300 6627 Stockton Avenue Widening Ripon, City of 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 6629 MacArthur Drive Widening Tracy, City of 3,194 0 0 3,194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,194 6630 Harney Lane Grade Sep / UPRR* Lodi, City of 12,100 0 0 0 12,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,100 7101 Carpenteria Crk-Sycamore Crk Rte 101 HOV Lanes SBCAG 8,853 0 0 0 0 0 8,853 0 0 0 0 8,853 0 7952 Planning, programming and monitoring SJCOG 1,000 0 200 200 200 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 Totals 41,508 0 200 3,394 13,300 200 9,053 0 0 0 0 8,853 17,294 *Project received early allocation June 2015. Proposed 2016 Regional Improvement Program ($1,000s) PPNO Title Sponsor TOTAL PRIOR 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 PAED PSE RW SUP CON SUP RW CON 3045 SR 99/Turner Road Operational Improvements Lodi, City of 3,061 0 0 0 3,061 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,061 3046 SR 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Manteca, City of 12,300 0 0 0 12,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,300 6627 Stockton Avenue Widening Ripon, City of 1,000 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 6629 MacArthur Drive Widening Tracy, City of 3,194 0 3,194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,194 7101 Carpenteria Crk-Sycamore Crk Rte 101 HOV Lanes SBCAG 8,853 0 0 0 8,853 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,853 0 7952 Planning, programming and monitoring SJCOG 600 0 200 200 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 Totals 29,008 0 3,394 1,200 24,414 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,853 20,155 Proposed Programming Changes to Existing STIP Projects New STIP Projects/Programming (n/a) M:\Transportation Planning and Programming\RTIP_STIP\2016 STIP\Draft RTIP\2016 RTIP_Project Spreadsheet for Draft RTIP.xls 09/30/2015

October 2015 TAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment #2, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis Motion to Approve 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment #2, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis DISCUSSION: SUMMARY: SJCOG released 2014 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment #2, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Amendment # 14, and the corresponding conformity analysis on August 31, 2015. A public meeting was held September 17, 2015. As of the drafting of this staff report, no comments have been received. 2014 RTP Amendment #2 and 2015 FTIP Amendment #14 makes numerous funding, scope, and/or schedule changes to the projects listed in the background section of this staff report. The SJCOG board is anticipated to take action on the 2014 RTP Amendment #2, 2015 FTIP Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis at their regularly scheduled October board meeting. Federal and state approval is required and is anticipated to occur on or before December 31, 2015. The amendment documentation can be found at the SJCOG website at www.sjcog.org. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the SJCOG OWP.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is to provide the vision for long range transportation planning in San Joaquin County, and to guide public policy decisions regarding transportation expenditures and financing. The plan recognizes that our transportation network is a tremendous resource that has a significant bearing and impact on the region s quality of life and economic vitality. The basic premise behind the FTIP is that it s the incremental implementation (four years) of the long-range Regional Transportation Plan (20 years). The FTIP is a fiscally constrained document developed by SJCOG through its member agencies and in cooperation with state and federal agencies and the other seven San Joaquin Valley counties. The FTIP presents federal funding agencies with manageable components for funding the long-range plan. The FTIP compiles individual projects and project lists from various sources. Any surface transportation project requiring federal funding or a federal action to proceed must be included in the FTIP. SJCOG released 2014 RTP Amendment #2, 2015 FTIP Amendment #14, and corresponding conformity analysis for 30-day public comment August 31, 2015. No comments were received. The SJCOG board will be requested to take action approving the amendment at its October 22, 2015 meeting. Federal and state approval of the amendment is anticipated no later than December 31, 2015. 2014 RTP Amendment #2 makes changes to the following projects: Woodward Island Bridge (changes the open to traffic date) McHenry Avenue Improvements and Bridge Replacement (changes open to traffic date) Stockton Hammer Lane Phase III (changes project scope to match Measure K Cooperative Agreement) 2015 FTIP Amendment #14 makes funding changes and/or minor scope changes to the following projects: McHenry Avenue Bridge City of Tracy Transit Operations RTD Preventative Maintenance RTD Transit Planning City of Tracy Fixed Route Bus Replacement RTD Transit Safety and Security RTD Grant Administration Thornton Road Widening Hammer Lane Phase III B RTD Operations RTD Bus Replacement Caltrans Minor Program Caltrans Highway Maintenance Program

Additional details describing the changes resulting from 2014 RTP Amendment #2 and 2015 FTIP Amendment #14 contained in attachments one and two of this staff report. The above mentioned project changes require SJCOG document that the 2014 RTP Amendment #2 and 2015 FTIP Amendment #14 continue to conform to the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act. The associated conformity analysis documents SJCOG s compliance. NEXT STEPS: October 22, 2015 Anticipated SJCOG board approval December 31, 2015 Anticipated State and Federal Approval of Amendment ATTACHMENT: 1. 2014 RTP Amendment #2 Summary of Changes 2. 2015 FTIP Amendment #14 Summary of Changes 3. Resolution R-16-03: 2014 RTP Amendment #2, 2015 FTIP Amendment #14, and Corresponding Conformity Analysis Prepared by: Tanisha Taylor, Senior Regional Planner

Attachment 2: 2014 RTP Amendment 2 Summary of Changes 2014 RTP Amendment # 2 Summary of Changes The RTP as amended conforms to the applicable State Implementation Plans (SIPs), meets all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450, and meets the transportation conformity regulations. These changes require a formal RTP amendment (new regional emissions analysis). These changes are necessary to change the scope and/or schedule for the projects listed below. There is no impact to the 2014 RTP fiscal constraint. Table 6.3 has been updated accordingly. 2014 RTP Amendment #2 makes the following changes to the 2014 RTP: Woodward Island Bridge (SJ07 3608) Changes project open to traffic date from 2017 to 2019. See below for project details. MPO RTP ID Jurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Total Project Cost Open to Traffic SJ07 3608 San Joaquin County Bacon Island Bridge HBRR Bacon Island Bridge over Middle River Woodward Island Ferry replacement with 2 lane bridge. Bacon Island over Middle River Woodward Island Bridge $13,015,200 2019 McHenry Avenue Improvements and Bridge Replacement (SJ11 3025) Changes project open to traffic date from 2017 to 2019 MPO RTP ID Jurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Total Project Cost Open to Traffic SJ11 3025 San Joaquin County McHenry Avenue Improvements and Bridge Replacement Widening McHenry Avenue to install a twoway left turn lane and replacing two bridge structures Stanislaus River Bridge to Jones Avenue $28,309,200 2019

Attachment 2: 2014 RTP Amendment 2 Summary of Changes Stockton Hammer Lane Phase III (SJ11 3006) Changes the project scope from Widen from 2 to 4 lanes from Alexander Rd to Thornton Rd including Pershing Ave intersection to Widen from 4 to 6 lanes from Alexandria Place to Thornton Road and changes the open to traffic date from 2018 to 2016. MPO RTP ID Jurisdiction Facility Name/Route Project Description Project Limits Total Project Cost Open to Traffic SJ11 3006 Stockton Hammer Lane (Phase III) Widen from 2 4 to 4 6 lanes Alexander Rd Alexandria Place to Thornton Rd including Pershing Ave intersection $12,700,000 2016

Attachment 1: 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 Summary of Changes Summary of Changes SJCOG Amendment Number 14 Existing / New CTIPS ID PROJECT TITLE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Phase CTIPS Fund Type PRIOR CTIPS Amt. CURRENT CTIPS Amt. FFY Financial Table Fund Source Net Increase / Decrease Total Project Cost Change % Comments Existing 112-0000-0142 McHenry Avenue Improvements Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. CON County Funds $0 $363,630 15/16 Local Funds $363,630 PE STP Local $5,499,000 $0 17/18 RSTP ($5,499,000) CON STP Local $0 $4,302,350 17/18 RSTP $4,302,350 -$833,020-15% Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. Project will use EPSP to advance RSTP funds to FY 15/16. Toll Credits apply. Technical corrections made to PE and ROW programming in Prior Years. Existing 212-0000-0008 HBRR McHenry Ave Bridge No 29C0166 Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. CON Local Transportation Funds - AC $0 $2,114,100 15/16 Local Funds $2,114,100 CON STP Local $0 $273,900 17/18 RSTP $273,900 CON LTF $256,000 $0 18/19 Local Funds ($256,000) $153,000 7% Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. Project will use EPSP to advance RSTP funds to FY 15/16. Technical corrections made to PE and ROW programming in Prior Years. CON Local HBRR $1,979,000 $0 18/19 HBP ($1,979,000) Existing 212-0000-0149 Operating Assistance Reduces FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 15/16 CON FTA 5307 $835,961 $600,000 15/16 FTA 5307 ($235,961) CON TDA $835,961 $600,000 15/16 Local Funds ($235,961) -$471,922-9% Reduces FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 15/16 CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,823,256 16/17 FTA 5307 $1,823,256 CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,859,721 17/18 FTA 5307 $1,859,721 Existing 212-0000-0161 Preventative Maintenance Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,896,916 18/19 FTA 5307 $1,896,916 CON TDA $0 $455,814 16/17 Local Funds $455,814 CON TDA $0 $464,930 17/18 Local Funds $464,930 $4,603,721 104% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON TDA $0 $474,229 18/19 Local Funds $474,229 CON FTA 5307 $520,000 $0 14/15 FTA 5307 ($520,000) Existing 212-0000-0167 Planning Removes FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $520,000 $0 15/16 FTA 5307 ($520,000) CON TDA $130,000 $0 14/15 Local Funds ($130,000) -$1,300,000-100% Removes all FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 14/15 and FY 15/16. CON TDA $130,000 $0 15/16 Local Funds ($130,000) CON Local Transportation Funds - AC $0 $16,085,900 15/16 Local Funds $16,085,900 CON STP Local $0 $922,750 17/18 RSTP $922,750 Existing 212-0000-0290 HBRR McHenry Ave Bridge No 38C0032 Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit $0 $238,576 15/16 Prop 1B $238,576 Account Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit CON $239,000 $0 18/19 Prop 1B ($239,000) Account CON Stanislaus County Funds $0 $922,750 15/16 Local Funds $922,750 CON Stanislaus County Funds $1,846,000 $0 18/19 Local Funds ($1,846,000) -$1,024 0% Adjusts programming to reflect current project understanding. Project will use EPSP to advance RSTP funds to FY 15/16. Technical corrections made to PE and ROW programming in Prior Years. CON Local HBRR $16,086,000 $0 18/19 HBP ($16,086,000) Existing 212-0000-0350 Fixed Route Bus Replacement Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $980,000 15/16 FTA 5307 $980,000 CON TDA $0 $245,000 15/16 Local Funds $245,000 $1,225,000 116% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 15/16. Project description adjusted. CON FTA 5307 $0 $53,574 16/17 FTA 5307 $53,574 CON FTA 5307 $0 $54,646 17/18 FTA 5307 $54,646 Existing 212-0000-0474 Safety and Security Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $55,739 18/19 FTA 5307 $55,739 CON TDA $0 $13,394 16/17 Local Funds $13,394 CON TDA $0 $13,661 17/18 Local Funds $13,661 $135,275 104% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON TDA $0 $13,935 18/19 Local Funds $13,935 CON FTA 5307 $0 $286,645 16/17 FTA 5307 $286,645 CON FTA 5307 $0 $292,378 17/18 FTA 5307 $292,378 Existing 212-0000-0475 Project and Grant Administration Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $298,225 18/19 FTA 5307 $298,225 CON TDA $0 $71,661 16/17 Local Funds $71,661 CON TDA $0 $73,094 17/18 Local Funds $73,094 $723,778 104% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON TDA $0 $74,556 18/19 Local Funds $74,556 Existing 212-0000-0563 Thornton Road Widening Adjusts programming to reflect currrent understanding. PE SJC Measure K $215,000 $670,000 14/15 Local Funds $455,000 CON SJC Measure K $0 $13,830,000 15/16 Local Funds $13,830,000 $14,285,000 6644% Adjusts programming to reflect full Measure K funding for PE phase and CON phase. Existing 212-0000-0565 Hammer Lane Phase IIIB Adjusts programming to reflect currrent understanding. PE SJC Measure K $240,000 $400,000 14/15 Local Funds $160,000 CON SJC Measure K $0 $9,100,000 15/16 Local Funds $9,100,000 $9,260,000 4307% Adjusts programming to reflect full Measure K funding for PE phase and CON phase. Project description updated to correct scope of widening. CON FTA 5307 $0 $222,229 16/17 FTA 5307 $222,229 CON FTA 5307 $0 $226,674 17/18 FTA 5307 $226,674 Existing 212-0000-0610 Capital Tire Lease Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $231,208 18/19 FTA 5307 $231,208 CON TDA $0 $55,557 16/17 Local Funds $55,557 CON TDA $0 $56,669 17/18 Local Funds $56,669 $561,129 104% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON TDA $0 $57,802 18/19 Local Funds $57,802 Existing 212-0000-0673 Capital Cost of Contracting Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 15/16 CON FTA 5307 $0 $504,430 15/16 FTA 5307 $504,430 CON TDA $0 $126,108 15/16 Local Funds $126,108 $630,538 159% Adds FTA 5307 and TDA funds in FY 15/16 New 212-0000-0684 GPF Safety Improvements - Minor Program Adds new Caltrans grouped listing CON SHOPP Advance Construction (AC) $0 $2,673,000 15/16 CT Minor Program $2,673,000 $2,673,000 100% New 212-0000-0685 GPF Resurface/Rehab on SHS - Highway Maintenance Adds new Caltrans grouped listing CON National Hwy System $0 $4,473,000 15/16 Highway Maintenance $4,473,000 CON Surface Transportation Program $0 $1,085,000 15/16 Highway Maintenance $1,085,000 $5,558,000 100% CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,045,423 14/15 FTA 5307 $1,045,423 CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,066,331 15/16 FTA 5307 $1,066,331 CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,087,658 16/17 FTA 5307 $1,087,658 CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,109,411 17/18 FTA 5307 $1,109,411 New 212-0000-0686 Direct Operational Costs New project with FTA 5307 and TDA funds CON FTA 5307 $0 $1,131,599 18/19 FTA 5307 $1,131,599 CON TDA $0 $1,045,423 14/15 Local Funds $1,045,423 CON TDA $0 $1,066,331 15/16 Local Funds $1,066,331 CON TDA $0 $1,087,658 16/17 Local Funds $1,087,658 CON TDA $0 $1,109,411 17/18 Local Funds $1,109,411 $8,617,646 100% CON TDA $0 $1,131,599 18/19 Local Funds $1,131,599 CON FTA 5339 $0 $1,027,622 14/15 FTA 5339 $1,027,622 CON FTA 5339 $0 $524,087 15/16 FTA 5339 $524,087 CON FTA 5339 $0 $534,569 16/17 FTA 5339 $534,569 CON FTA 5339 $0 $545,260 17/18 FTA 5339 $545,260 New 212-0000-0686 Bus Replacements New project with FTA 5339 and TDA funds CON FTA 5339 $0 $556,166 18/19 FTA 5339 $556,166 CON TDA $0 $256,906 14/15 Local Funds $256,906 CON TDA $0 $131,022 15/16 Local Funds $131,022 CON TDA $0 $133,642 16/17 Local Funds $133,642 CON TDA $0 $136,315 17/18 Local Funds $136,315 $3,289,423 100% CON TDA $0 $139,041 18/19 Local Funds $139,041 Sum of Net Change by Federal Fiscal Year and Fund Source 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Totals CT Minor Program $0 $2,673,000 $0 $0 $2,673,000 Highway Maintenance $0 $5,558,000 $0 $0 $5,558,000 RSTP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA 5307 $1,045,423 $1,290,370 $3,473,362 $3,542,830 $9,351,985 FTA 5339 $1,027,622 $524,087 $534,569 $545,260 $2,631,538 State Bond $0 $238,576 $0 $0 $238,576 Local Funds $1,787,329 $43,618,880 $1,817,726 $1,854,080 $49,078,015 Total $3,860,374 $53,902,913 $5,825,657 $5,942,170 $69,531,114

RESOLUTION SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS R-16-03 In the Matter of: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE San Joaquin Council of Governments 2014 RTP Amendment 2, 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 AND THE 2015 CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FOR THE 2008 OZONE AND 2012 PM2.5 STANDARDS WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Metropolitan Planning Organization, pursuant to State and Federal designation; and WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require Metropolitan Planning Organizations to prepare and adopt a long range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) for their region; and WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require that Metropolitan Planning Organizations prepare and adopt a Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) for their region; and WHEREAS, a 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment 2 has been prepared in full compliance with federal guidance; and WHEREAS, a 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment 2 has been prepared in accordance with state guidelines adopted by the California Transportation Commission; and WHEREAS, federal planning regulations require that Metropolitan Planning Organizations prepare and adopt a short range Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) for their region; and WI~REAS, the 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Amendment 14 (2015 FTIP Amendment 14) has been prepared to comply with Federal and State requirements for local projects and through a cooperative process between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the State Department of Transportation Page

2of3 R-16-03 (Caltrans), principal elected officials of general purpose local governments and their staffs, and public owner operators of mass transportation services acting through the SJCOG forum and general public involvement; and WHEREAS, the 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 program listing is consistent with: 1) the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment 2; 2) the 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program; and 3) the 2015 Conformity Analysis for the 2008 Ozone and 2012 PM2.5 Standards; and WHEREAS, the 2015 FTIP contains the MPO's certification of the transportation planning process assuring that all federal requirements have been fulfilled; and WHEREAS, the 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 and 2014 RTP Amendment 2 meets all applicable transportation planning requirements per 23 CFR Part 450. WHEREAS, projects submitted in the 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 and 2014 RTP Amendment # 2 must be financially constrained and the financial plan affirms that funding is available; and WHEREAS, the MPO must demonstrate conformity per 40 CFR Part 93 for the RTP and FTIP; and WHEREAS, the 2015 Conformity Analysis for the 2008 Ozone and 2012 PM2.5 Standards supports a finding that the 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 and 2014 RTP Amendment 2 meet the air quality conformity requirements for carbon monoxide, ozone and particulate matter; and WHEREAS, the 2014 RTP Amendment 2 and 2015 FrIP Amendment 14 do not interfere with the timely implementation of the Transportation Control Measures; and WHEREAS, the 2014 RTP Amendment 2 and 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 conforms to the applicable SIPS; and WHEREAS, the documents have been widely circulated and reviewed by SJCOG advisory committees representing the technical and management staffs of the member agencies; representatives of other governmental agencies, including State and Federal; representatives of special interest groups; representatives of the private business sector; and residents of San Joaquin County consistent with public participation process adopted by SJCOG and 2

Page 3 of 3 R-16-03 WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on September 17, 2015 to hear and consider comments on the 2014 RTP Amendment 2, 2015 FTIP Amendment 14, and 2015 Conformity Analysis for the 2008 Ozone and 2012 PM2.5 Standards; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that San Joaquin Council of Governments adopts the 2014 RTP Amendment 2, 2015 FTIP Amendment 14, and 2015 Conformity Analysis for the 2008 Ozone and 2012 PM2.5 Standards Conformity Analysis. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the San Joaquin Council of Governments finds that the 2014 RTP Amendment 2 and 2015 FTIP Amendment 14 are in confornuty with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments and applicable State Implementation Plans for air quality. THE FOREGOIlVG RESOLUTION was passed and adopted by the San Joaquin Council of Governments this 22 d day of October, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Signed: ANTHONY SILVA Chair I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution of the San Joaquin Council of Governments duly adopted at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22 d day of October, 2015. Signed: Executive Director 3