KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

Similar documents
Stimulus Funding and Transportation

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Delaware Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Borough of Norristown Plymouth Township Montgomery County, PA

Utah Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Capital Investment Program

Florida Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

South Dakota Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

SENATE, No. 876 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE FEASIBILITIY STUDY

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

Overview of Presentation

RURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture

Texas Department of Transportation

Nevada Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Montana Smart Transportation:

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Please complete your phone connection now:

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

Michigan. Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Request for Qualifications For

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

Post Papal Perspective

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

Public Private Partnerships and Transit Not Just for Mega Projects Karin DeMoors October 28, 2015

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Part I. Federal Section 5310 Program

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

S E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016

The RTD FasTracks Plan

MaineDOT Work Plan. Calendar Years. January 201

Chris Bridges CYMPO Administrator

Washington State Department of Transportation

Community Development Agency Capital Improvement Program TIM Fee Program Cash Proforma (by Revenue Grouping)

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

Economic, Cultural, Tourism and Sustainability Grants Policy Program Goals, Categories, Criteria, and Requirements

KANSAS CITY REGIONAL TIGER PROJECT PMOC PROGESS REPORT 2014 Fiscal Quarter 1 October 1 December 31, 2013

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

Formal STIP Amendment

MID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION.

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

SEDA Council of Governments. Harrisburg

Long Range Transportation Plan

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

Staff Recommendation:

First in Safety and Service Our highest priority is to strive to be a high performance organization that is effective, efficient and accountable for

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH

Federal Transit Administration: Section Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. Call for Projects.

Special State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track. October 25, 2012

$787 Billion Economic Recovery Package Clears Congress; Focuses On Long- Term Competitiveness, in Addition to Job Creation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for the Development of Sidewalk Inventory for the DVRPC Region

SSTI s PennDOT Smart Transportation Webinar

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

TRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions

Table of Contents. Page 2

Recent Developments in the Receipt and Distribution of Federal Stimulus Funds in Illinois

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

The FAST Act: Implications for the African-American Community

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

Director of Transportation Planning

NEWS: Senate Committee Approves FY2019 Transportation, HUD Appropriations Bill 1 message

Florida s Future: Funding Growth Through Public Private Partnerships. Ed Turanchik. March 10, 2014

Transcription:

S T I M U L U S F O R G R E A T E R P H I L A D E L P H I A : W H A T I T M E A N S F O R T R A N S P O R T A T I O N I N V E S T M E N T I N T H E R E G I O N KEY TAKEAWAYS Greater Philadelphia will likely receive more than $600 million from the $48.1 billion in transportation stimulus funds, including approximately $318 for highways in southeastern Pennsylvania, $120 million for highways in southern New Jersey, and $193 million for SEPTA. The shovel-ready stipulation limits use of stimulus funds for vision investment. Most of the region s candidate projects focus on clearing deferred maintenance. The stimulus package will not blaze any new trails, but it is an opportunity for the region to play catch up and look to the future on better footing. THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN The $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009 was slightly scaled back from of the original U.S. House and Senate versions but retained most if its spending provisions. But while many have billed this most recent round of government spending as infrastructure stimulus, the reality is that only a small portion of the final package is dedicated to infrastructure, and an even smaller portion to transportation infrastructure. Two-thirds of the stimulus package will be funneled to individuals, businesses, and states through direct aid or tax cuts. The remaining third will fund government projects, the majority of which will be directed to infrastructure spending. Transportation infrastructure will receive $48.1 billion, or just more than six percent of the total stimulus package. More than half, or $27.5 billion, will be used for highway improvements. Another $8.4 billion will go to public transit improvements, $1.3 billion to Amtrak capital improvements, and $1.3 billion to aviation improvements. The final bill also included a new provision of $8 billion for capital investments in designated high-speed rail corridors. 1 P a g e

GREATER PHILADELPHIA S SHARE Highway stimulus funds will be distributed to states by Federal Highway Administration formula. Of the total $27.5 billion, Pennsylvania will receive $1.026 billion and New Jersey $652 million. If the five counties of southeastern Pennsylvania and four counties of southern New Jersey 1 receive their population-based share of highway dollars, 2 Greater Philadelphia will receive $318 million from Pennsylvania and $120 million from New Jersey, for a total of approximately $438 million dedicated to highway capital projects in the region. For public transit, the majority 3 of stimulus funds will be distributed to states by Federal Transit Administration formula. Pennsylvania will receive $263 million and New Jersey will receive $447 million. While states will have general discretion, formulas allocate 80 percent of these funds to urban areas. If Greater Philadelphia receives the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority s ridership-based share 4 of Pennsylvania s total, Greater Philadelphia will receive approximately $193 million 5 dedicated to transit capital projects, plus any transit funds received for New Jersey. 6 Combined, stimulus funds will bring an estimated $631 million to the region for highway and transit projects. 1 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission territory: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer Counties in New Jersey. 2 The final bill requires that states sub-allocate 30 percent by population and 3 percent to transportation enhancements. The remaining 67 percent can be allocated at state discretion. Source: Transportation Weekly, Special Supplement: Highway Formula Funding in the Final Stimulus Conference Report, February 12, 2009. 3 Of the $8.4 billion, $1.5 billion is set aside for new starts and fixed guideway modernization projects and will be distributed on a project basis by the FTA. 4 SEPTA accounts for approximately 75 percent of all Pennsylvania transit trips. 5 SEPTA staff expects its actual allocation to be anywhere from $175 to $200 million. 6 The region will also likely receive funds from New Jersey for transit, but the vast majority of New Jersey Transit ridership is contained within the New York area. 2 P a g e

WHAT THE MONEY WILL BUY Highway and transit officials across Greater Philadelphia have been working to develop projects that satisfy the stimulus package s shovel-ready criteria. Preliminary analysis indicates that the region currently has $1.4 billion dollars of transportation projects that will be ready to break ground within 120 days. The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is working with local and state agencies to expand and prioritize these lists to determine which projects will ultimately receive funding. In Pennsylvania, big-ticket items make up the bulk of the region s wish list. In Montgomery County, $120 million has been requested for bridge repair and repavement on the Blue Route (I-476). In Philadelphia County, $66 million has been requested for repairs to the Girard Point Bridge, which carries I-95 between the Philadelphia International Airport and downtown. PennDOT has requested another $153 million for ramp reconstruction and information technology installation, while county transportation boards have requested $78 million mostly for traffic signals, resurfacing, and new medians. In sum, local and state authorities have requested $423 million for road, highway, and bridge projects in southeastern Pennsylvania. In New Jersey, $227 million has been requested for multiple projects along the I-295 corridor through Camden and Burlington Counties, including a "direct connection" of I-295 with Route 42 and I-76. NJDOT has requested another $37 million more for bridge repair and resurfacing and $13 million for better drainage along Camden County s often-flooded Admiral Wilson Boulevard (U.S. Route 30). County transportation boards have requested another $43.8 million mostly for traffic signals and resurfacing. In sum, local and state authorities have requested $320 million for road, highway, and bridge projects in southern New Jersey. 3 P a g e

For regional transit, SEPTA has requested $478 million for system-wide renewal projects. The most expensive items are $41 million for rehabilitating a bridge on the Route 100 Norristown Line, $37 million for a new audio-visual public address system on the Regional Rail and suburban high-speed lines, $36 million for rehabilitating the Spring Garden Street and Girard Avenue Stations on the Broad Street Subway, and $34 million for a new power and signal substation on the R3-West Trenton Line. SEPTA requests were prioritized based on equitable distribution for city and suburban riders and crosses all service mode bus, subway, trolley, and rail. DRPA also has requested $176 million, mostly for replacing PATCO s existing car fleet. NOTABLE HIGHWAY PROJECTS ACROSS GREATER PHILADELPHIA County Roadway Type of Work Description Request Bucks I-95 Highway safety ITS Installation $36.3 million Phase I of multi-use Chester Chester Valley Trail Transportation enhancement trail $18.0 million Delaware I-95 Highway safety ITS installation $37.5 million Montgomery I-476 Bridge rehabilitation Pavement & structure preservation $120.0 million Philadelphia I-95/Girard Pt. Bridge Bridge rehabilitation Bridge paint and structural repair $66.0 million Burlington I-295 Pavement reconstruction Rancocas-Mt. Holly Road to Rt. 130 $120.0 million Camden I-295/I-76/SR42 Design & right-of-way acquisition Direct connection with Route 42 and I-76 $23.0 million Mercer Rt. 1 Repavement Delaware and Raritan Canal to CR533 $10.0 million Various I-295/I-676 Bridge rehabilitation Corridor painting $6.0 million Source: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission NOTABLE TRANSIT PROJECTS ACROSS GREATER PHILADELPHIA Agency Project Title Type of Work Division Request SEPTA Power substations Overhaul System-wide $61.4 million SEPTA Regional rail stations Renovation & expansion Regional rail $55.0 million SEPTA Broad Street Subway stations (Spring Garden St., Girard Avenue, and Allegheny Avenue) Rehabilitation City transit $41.4 million SEPTA Route 100 Bridgeport Norristown viaduct Rehabilitation Suburban transit $40,9 million Suburban transit SEPTA Audio visual public address (AVPA) systems Installation /regional rail $36.7 million SEPTA Police radio equipment Interoperability City transit $24.5 million Suburban/city SEPTA 40 hybrid buses Purchase transit $17.8 million DRPA PATCO cars Purchase /rebuild PATCO $135.0 million Source: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission 4 P a g e

WHAT IT ULTIMATELY MEANS TO THE REGION More than a half-billion dollar influx of transportation funds will help to chip away at the region s backlog of deferred infrastructure maintenance. In southeastern Pennsylvania, state and local governments spend a total of nearly $700 million each year to maintain 14,450 miles of roads and 2,800 bridges. A one-time influx of $318 million would represent a nearly 50 percent increase in highway spending for the five counties. Stimulus funds will be a particular boon for capital-starved transit agencies like SEPTA. Years of underinvestment have degraded the system s infrastructure. A one-time influx of $193 million will represent a more than 50 percent increase over SEPTA s $368 million capital budget for Fiscal Year 2009, helping the agency play catch up. Still, the stimulus package s shovel-ready criterion limits opportunities for visionary investment. Many of the region s forward-looking projects require several more months if not years of planning and design, and thus would not qualify as a candidate project for stimulus funding. The risk of this approach is devoting scarce resources to expedient, short-term fixes instead of to well-planned investments. The strategy will create jobs and circulate dollars through the economy, but it will do so indiscriminately and without regard to long-run economic impact. In short, the stimulus will not chart a new course for the future. But, with a coherent strategy to leverage this one-time shot-in-the-arm, it can serve as a catalyst for change. Its ultimate impact will depend on the extent to which stimulus funds fuel progress towards the broader objective of a world class transportation network. In this, Greater Philadelphia has an opportunity to anticipate and plan for future needs. And of course, developing a shared vision now will prepare the region for new opportunities that arise in the future and, potentially, another stimulus. 5 P a g e