Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial 5 th May 2017
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM - Basic Concept The Needs for Cross-Border ATFM in APAC Domestic ATFM Cross-Border ATFM? Regional Central ATFM Unit? 3
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM - Basic Concept Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Network Bases: Common ATFM principles and guidance with harmonized protocols supported by agreed Common Operating Procedures (COP) Effective information sharing and dissemination framework Concept: Independent virtual ATFM nodes supported by interconnected information sharing framework Supplement: A-CDM Process 5
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM - Basic Concept Flight Operations Centre (FOC) ATS Units Pilot Flow Management Position (FMP) Flow Management Position (FMP) ATFM Information ATS Units MET Info A-CDM Airport Operator ARRIVAL ATFM NODE DEPARTURE ATFM NODE 6
Operational Trial Project Overview Phased Approach to the Operational Trial Phase 1 2015-2016 Ground Delay Program supporting Airport Congestions Phase 2 2017 - TBD Ground Delay Program supporting Airspace Congestion Interconnectivity among ATFM systems Phase X Vision Fully interconnected Global ATFM Service Integration with SWIM and 4D-Trajectory Management 7
Operational Trial Project Overview Tiered Participation Model Level 3 ATFM Nodes Generate, Distribute, Comply to CTOT China, Hong Kong China, Singapore, Thailand Level 2 ATFM Nodes Receive and Comply to CTOT Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia Level 1 ATFM Nodes Observers Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines, Viet Nam Advisory ATFM Node Australia 8
Phase 1: Concept and Overview Phase 1 Overview Stage Plan Phase 1 2015-2016 Ground Delay Program supporting Airport Congestions 10
Phase 1: Concept and Overview Phase 1 Overview Stage Plan Phase 1 DCB for Constrained Airports Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Communication Linkage and Protocols Dissemination of Information Demand Prediction Validation Local Table-Top Exercises Cross-Border ATFM Procedures Development and Validation (through demo flights) Phase 2 DCB for Constrained Airspace TBD Limited-Scope Operational Service 11
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Operational Concept and Objective Key Objective: Effectiveness of ATFM in Live Situations To test ATFM Service under real environment; and To implement cross-border ATFM focusing on airport constraints progressively, ensuring readiness of stakeholders ATFM System Infrastructure and Internal Procedures (Readiness Checklist) Communication Infrastructure and Demand Prediction Capability (Stage 1 work) Associated Documents and Stakeholder Awareness (COP, AIP Supplement / AIC, Awareness Campaign) Harmonized and Validated ATFM Processes (Stage 2 work) 16
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Stage 3 Activities in 2016 Aug Sep Oct Nov - Dec Singapore s National Day Royal Thai Air Force Air Show Five Power Defence Arrangement Exercise Northeast Monsoon Season Planned Events Semi-Ad Hoc Events 17
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Singapore National Day Parade 2016 (WSSS) Event Detail Closure of WSSS for NDP 16 aerial flypast between 1035 1105 UTC 16, 23, 30 July and 9 August 2016 ATFM Measure Implemented GDP / CTOT for flights destination WSSS between 0930 1230 UTC on all dates Aug Sep Oct Nov - Dec Singapore s National Day Royal Thai Air Force Air Show Five Power Defence Arrangement Exercise Northeast Monsoon Season 18
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Singapore National Day Parade 2016 (WSSS) CTOT Compliance Result Average CTOT compliance = 70% Program Result Average airborne delay reduction 6 minutes Shorter time required for recovery Aug Sep Oct Nov - Dec Singapore s National Day Royal Thai Air Force Air Show Five Power Defence Arrangement Exercise Northeast Monsoon Season 19
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Stage 3 Activities in 2017 Jan Mar Multi-Nodal/13 Apr Thailand s Children Day Air Display VTBS Runway 19L Maintenance Bangkok, Thailand Continuation of Implementation Semi-Ad Hoc Events Ad-Hoc Implementation 26
Phase 1 Stage 3: Limited-Scope Ops Service Summary of Contributions in Phase 1 Validated cross-border ATFM procedure for airport constraints Demonstration of ATFM programs in live operations Increasing readiness level of stakeholders, with some able to support ad-hoc ATFM measures Incorporation of Multi-Nodal concept into ICAO Doc 9971 (3 rd edition, in print) Representation in CANSO Best Practice Guide on ATFM Implementation (in development) 30
Phase 1 - Forward to Implementation Forward Plan Level 3 ATFM Nodes moving toward Operationally-Ready ATFM Service Singapore: 1 Apr 2017 Thailand: 1 Apr 2017 Combined ATFM measure deployed as needed Strengthened Post-Ops Analysis Framework Increased involvement of Level 2 ATFM Nodes Analysis process closer to actual operations time Strengthened Tiered Participation Model Parallel development of Phase 2 31
Phase 1 - Forward Plan to Implementation Post-Ops Analysis Framework (1/5) Objective: To harmonize Post-Ops Analysis for GDP/CTOT programs Possibility: inclusion in Regional Framework document Focus: 2-sided Post-Ops Analysis Departure ANSP GDP Impact Departure Compliance Departure Situation Feedback on Process Arrival ANSP GDP Impact Departure and Arrival Compliance GDP Effectiveness 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 32
Phase 1 - Forward Plan to Implementation Post-Ops Analysis Framework (2/5) Proposed KPI: Arrival ANSP GDP Impact Data ATFM Delay Statistics Total, Average, Maximum Flight Breakdown By type (Int l vs Dom) By ADEP, airlines By project participation Data Source ATFM System, FPL ATFM System 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 33
Phase 1 - Forward Plan to Implementation Post-Ops Analysis Framework (3/5) Proposed KPI: Arrival ANSP Compliance Data CTOT Compliance Statistics Compliance ratio Distribution of diff(atot, CTOT) CTO / CLDT Compliance Statistics Compliance ratio Distribution of diff(ato/aldt, CTO/CLDT) Compliance Breakdown By type (Int l vs Dom) By ADEP, airlines By project participation 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 Data Source ATFM System, DEP Messages ATFM System, DEP Messages ATFM System, DEP Messages 34
Phase 1 - Forward Plan to Implementation Post-Ops Analysis Framework (4/5) Proposed KPI: Arrival ANSP GDP Effectiveness Data Delay Attribution Overall system (ground + airborne) delay Ratio ground delay : airborne delay Difference in delay between compliant and non-compliant flights Operational Effectiveness Expected flow vs achieved flow Data Source ATFM System ARR Messages / Radar track 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 35
Phase 1 - Forward Plan to Implementation Post-Ops Analysis Framework (5/5) Proposed KPI: Departure ANSP Departure Compliance Data CTOT Compliance Statistics Compliance ratio Departure Time Distribution Statistics on diff(atot, CTOT) Distribution of diff(atot, CTOT) Compliance Breakdown By airlines Commentary on departure facilitation Feedback on process and information distribution Data Source ATFM System, DEP Messages ATFM System, DEP Messages ATFM System, DEP Messages 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 36
Project Phase 1 Participation - Forward to Implementation Multi-Nodal ATFM Network Tiered Participation 24 Mar 2017 Multi-Nodal/13 37
Phase 1 - Forward to Implementation Current Participation Rate 35-50% Target : 70% Building the Momentum to further enhance Multi-Nodal ATFM in Phase 1 Level 2 ANSPs 16 Airports Level 3 ANSPs 16 Airports Total Airports in the Multi-Nodal ATFM Network 32 39
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Beyond Phase 1 of the Operational Trial Phase 1 2015-2016 Distributed Ground Delay Program Airport Arrival Constraints (short-term & medium-term) e.g. weather, runway outage Phase 2 Ground Delay Program supporting Airspace Congestion & Capacity Planning Explore interconnectivity among ATFM systems Phase X Vision Fully interconnected Global ATFM Service Integration with SWIM and 4D-Trajectory Management 40
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Phase 2 Key Objective Key Objective: Distributed ATFM Programs to Support Airspace Constraints To develop ATFM procedure for constrained airspace To validate the procedure and pave way for implementation ATFM System Infrastructure and Internal Procedures Local procedure to support ATFM programs ATFM System-to-System Information Sharing Associated Documents and Stakeholder Awareness (COP, AIP Supplement / AIC, Awareness Campaign) Harmonized and Validated ATFM Processes 41
Part 7 Phase 2: Concept and Overview Initial Activities Jan Feb Mar Multi-Nodal /13 Thailand s Children Day Air Display Cobra Gold 2017 Joint Military Exercise Cope Tiger 2017 Joint Military Exercise Bangkok, Thailand Planned Events Activity Review 42
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Cope Tiger 2017 Joint Military Exercise (BKK FIR) Event Detail Annual large-scale joint military exercise taking up part of BKK FIR; congestion increase on alternate routings 20 31 March 2017 ATFM Measure Planned GDP / CTOT for flights destination VTBS, VTBD via TL, RAMEI, PAKRI Jan Feb Mar Multi-Nodal /13 Thailand s Children Day Air Display Cobra Gold 2017 Joint Military Exercise Cope Tiger 2017 Joint Military Exercise Bangkok, Thailand 45
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Cope Tiger 2017 Joint Military Exercise (BKK FIR) CTOT Compliance Result High compliance ratio, 90+% Program Result Smoothened inbound traffic into BKK TMA Reduced congestion around route converging waypoints Jan Feb Mar Multi-Nodal /13 Thailand s Children Day Air Display Cobra Gold 2017 Joint Military Exercise Cope Tiger 2017 Joint Military Exercise Bangkok, Thailand 46
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Phase 2 Key Items Airspace (dynamic) Capacity Assessment GDP/CTOT for Airspace Constraints Multi-Constraints ATFM Measure(s) ATFM System Information Linkage 48
Phase 2: Concept and Overview Phase 2 Stage Plan Phase 1 Continued Implementation Phase 2 DCB for Airspace Constraints Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Airspace Capacity Assessment Demand Monitoring and Prediction Demand and Flight Trajectory Accuracy Assessment Single-Constraint DCB Combined ATFM Measures ATFM System-to-System Information Linkage Stakeholder Engagement Multi-Constraint DCB (Layered ATFM Measures) 49
Technical Subgroup Allow information sharing Achieve certain degree of synchronization between ATFM Systems Harmonizing data format and infrastructure (possibly FIXM & SWIM Technology) For effective ATFM Operation TSG s objective Need for information sharing between ATFM Systems TSG established to achieve ATFM to ATFM systems interconnection Progress of TSG - Identified Basic Ops Use Cases - Identified Requires Data Fields - Mapped Data Fields to Existing Standards, ie FIXM Next Steps - Testing of sharing of CTOTs information between two ATFM system - Drafting of ICD 50
Q uestions & D i s cuss ions