The Impact of CPOE and CDS on the Medication Use Process and Pharmacist Workflow

Similar documents
COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY (CPOE)

Medication Safety Technology The Good, the Bad and the Unintended Consequences

In-Patient Medication Order Entry System - contribution of pharmacy informatics

Medication Reconciliation

Supplementary Appendix

Thanks to Anne C. Byrne, RN, Medical Monitor at Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital. This presentation was developed from one she designed for that

Health Management Information Systems: Computerized Provider Order Entry

Assessing Medical Technology- Are We Being Told the Truth. The Case of CPOE. David C Classen M.D., M.S. FCG and University of Utah

CRAIG HOSPITAL POLICY/PROCEDURE

Maryland Patient Safety Center s Annual MEDSAFE Conference: Taking Charge of Your Medication Safety Challenges November 3, 2011 The Conference Center

Go! Guide: Medication Administration

Order Source Misattribution: The Impact on CPOE Metrics

Medication Reconciliation with Pharmacy Technicians

The Evolution of eprescribing The Start of the Journey Professor Jamie Coleman

Best Practices and Performance Measures for Systemic Treatment Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems (ST CPOE) in Chemotherapy Delivery

Who Cares About Medication Reconciliation? American Pharmacists Association American Society of Health-system Pharmacists The Joint Commission Agency

HIT Usability and Data Breaches. Ritu Agarwal University of Maryland

Advanced Practice Provider (APP): Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician s Assistant (PA).

Re-Engineering Medication Processes to Capitalize on Technology. Jane Englebright, PhD, RN Vice President, Quality HCA

Bar Code Medication Administration and MAR Resource Manual

Fast & Furious: erx/epcs Implementation and Optimization

Objectives MEDICATION SAFETY & TECHNOLOGY. Disclosure. How has technology improved the way we dispense and compound medications AdminRx AcuDose Rx

Health Management Information Systems

University of Mississippi Medical Center University of Mississippi Health Care. Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Medication Use Evaluation

EMR Adoption: Benefits Realization

OHTAC Recommendation. Implementation and Use of Smart Medication Delivery Systems

Belgian Meaningful Use Criteria for Mental Healthcare Hospitals and other non-general Hospitals

Guidance for Medication Reconciliation and System Integration Process

Section 2 Medication Orders

Preventing Adverse Drug Events and Harm

Fully Featured Safe and Secure eprescribing from PatientSource. Patient Care Safely in One Place

Toward the Electronic Patient Record:

APPENDIX 8-2 CHECKLISTS TO ASSIST IN PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS

Medicine Reconciliation FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS NATIONAL MEDICATION SAFETY PROGRAMME

Objectives. Demographics: Type and Services 1/22/2014. ICAHN Aggregate Results. ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment for Hospitals

How can oncology practices deliver better care? It starts with staying connected.

SHRI GURU RAM RAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE MEDICATION ERRORS

17/06/2014. Clinicians Driving Technology - Developing ST CPOE Practice Guidelines and Supporting Their Adoption. Objectives. Cancer Care Ontario

Achieving Organizational Excellence Through Health

NOTE: The first appearance of terms in bold in the body of this document (except titles) are defined terms please refer to the Definitions section.

Medication Safety Action Bundle Adverse Drug Events (ADE) All High-Risk Medication Safety

IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON MEDICATION SAFETY

Optimizing Medication Safety in Maryland Assisted Living Facilities. Panel Discussion Moderated by: Nicole Brandt, PharmD

E-Prescribing: What Is It? Why Should I Do It? What's in the Future?

NOTE: The first appearance of terms in bold in the body of this document (except titles) are defined terms please refer to the Definitions section.

High Returns Pharming COWS

Aged residential care (ARC) Medication Chart implementation and training guide (version 1.1)

Meaningful Use Is a Stepping Stone to Meaningful Care

Go! Guide: Adding Medication Administration History

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

How Pharmacy Informatics and Technology are Evolving to Improve Patient Care

How BPOC Reduces Bedside Medication Errors White Paper

Patient Care: Case Study in EHR Implementation. With Help From Monkeys, Mice, and Penguins. Tom Goodwin, MHA MIT Medical Cambridge, MA March 2007

Medication Module Tutorial

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Human Factors. Frank Federico, RPh. This presenter has nothing to disclose.

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Medication Reconciliation: Preventing Errors and Improving Patient Outcomes

1. What are the two types of medication orders? Match the terms in Column A with the correct definitions in Column B.

Issue Brief. E-Prescribing in California: Why Aren t We There Yet? Introduction. Current Status of E-Prescribing in California

Maimonides Medical Center Makes a Quantum Leap with Advanced Computerized Patient Record Technology

Medication Reconciliation in Transitions of Care

Medication Management and Use. Anadolu Medical Center. August, Departman Tarih

Improving patient safety and infection. Patient Safety Forum Dr J Coleman 1 ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT (CDS)

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

3/9/2010. Objectives. Pharmacist Role in Medication Safety and Regulatory Compliance

Ensuring Safe & Efficient Communication of Medication Prescriptions

Millennium PowerChart Orders Reference Guide Created by Organizational Learning & Development, Clinical IT/Nursing Informatics: June 4, 2013

Medication Errors in Chemotherapy PORSCHA L. JOHNSON, PHARM.D. CLINICAL PHARMACIST II MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2016

Electronic Medication Administration Process and Tips

CPOE EVALUATION TOOL (V3.5) USER INSTRUCTIONS (FOR ADULT AND GENERAL HOSPITALS ONLY)

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

NYS E-Prescribing Mandate

Overview of the Leapfrog CPOE Evaluation Tool. An educational update to the HIMSS EIS Steering Committee August 13, 2009

eprescribing Information to Improve Medication Adherence

Medication Safety in LTC. Objectives. About ISMP Canada

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

TITLE: Processing Provider Orders: Inpatient and Outpatient

Medication Safety Way Beyond the 5 Rights

Electronic Prescribing of Chemotherapy-It s Not a Video Game!

One or More Errors in 67% of the IV Infusions: Insights from a Study of IV Medication Administration

Successful Clinical Process Redesign in a Connected Healthcare Community. Linus Diedling Allison Foley, MD Elliot Sternberg, MD Michelle Woodley, RN

Pharmacy s Role in Decreasing Hospital Readmissions

BPOC/eMAR Spotlight on Performance Improvement

MEDICINES RECONCILIATION GUIDELINE Document Reference

North York General Hospital Policy Manual

2011 Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program

To establish a consistent process for the activity of an independent double-check prior to medication administration, where appropriate.

04/08/2015. Thinking Beyond the Hospital Walls: Readmission Reduction Strategies for Pharmacists. Pharmacist Objectives. Technician Objectives

A PRIMER ON MEDICATION SYNCHRONIZATION JULY 14, :45 8:45 AM

Learner Manual. Document Best Possible Medication History (BPMH)

POLICY AND PROCEDURE DEPARTMENT: Pharmacy Operations

SafetyFirst Alert. Improving Prescription/Order Writing. Illegible handwriting

Definitions: In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:

Medication Reconciliation: Using Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Care. Becky Johnson, CPhT Megan Ohrlund, PharmD Steve Finch, RPh

Just Culture Toolkit Scenarios

Bar Code Medication Administration and MAR Resource Manual

Medication Reconciliation: Using Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Care. Objectives THE BASICS AND USING TECHNICIANS 3/22/2017

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Medication Reconciliation

Transcription:

The Impact of CPOE and CDS on the Medication Use Process and Pharmacist Workflow Conflict of Interest Disclosure The speaker has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. Anne M. Bobb, R.Ph., CPHIMS Administrator Clinical Quality Excellence Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children s Hospital of Chicago Learning Objectives Discuss the evidence supporting improved medication safety and quality with CPOE and CDS. List 2 3 unintended consequences of CPOE implementation. Learning Objectives Describe the pros and cons of an incremental CPOE implementation. Identify a potential pitfall of the cognitive change necessary for pharmacists to transition from order entry or transcription to order verification. My main job responsibility is: A. Pharmacy Director B. Pharmacy Manager C. Informatics Pharmacist D. Staff/Clinical Pharmacist E. Pharmacy Technician My organization s progress with the EHR / CPOE is: A. Fully implemented EHR and CPOE B. Partial EHR, including CPOE C. Partial EHR, excluding CPOE D. Planning stages E. No plans to implement 1

Overview Evidence of improved medication use with CPOE and CDS EHR and CPOE rollout strategies Unintended dconsequences Impact of MMIT on the Medication Use Process Implications for pharmacist workflow Clinical Decision Support (CDS) challenges Conclusions AHRQ MMIT Whitepaper Technology Studied by Phase Thorough review of literature on medication management information technology (MMIT) Seven key questions Within and across phases of medication management, what evidence exists that technology is effective? What Randomized Controlled Trials exist to support improved quality and safety with CPOE +/ CDS McKibbon KA, et al. Enabling Medication Management Through Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 201. 2011. Health IT CDS CPOE e-prescribing Barcode Med Administrati on emar Prescribing Order Communication/ Dispense Administration Monitoring 177 12 5 63 90 17 9 11 31 13 4 2 1 2 20 0 2 4 14 0 Healthcare Process Outcomes 379 studies 225 (60%) studied process changes Considered a positive outcome if at least 50% of outcomes studied were positively impacted by MMIT Phase Process Outcome Setting Percent Positive Prescribing Patient Safety Related Hospital 87% Ambulatory 68% Guideline Adherence Hospital 83% Ambulatory 64% There is strong evidence that CPOE and Clinical Decision Support improve outcomes. A True A. True B. False 2

Randomized Controlled Trials 77 RCTs primarily CDS Prescribing 71% Monitoring 29% Poor to mediocre study quality 67% (24/36) had positive process outcomes 15% (5/34) had positive clinical outcomes Clinical Outcomes and Conclusions 76 studies measured clinical outcomes or ADEs 34% reported significant benefits Most trials were conducted at institutions with a strong history of MMIT (Partners, Kaiser) Highly targeted interventions appear to be more effective than more diffusely focused systems such as CPOE and CDS. Challenges of studying patient outcomes Where to start? Big Bang vs. Incremental If you had the power to make the choice (EHR + CPOE), would you choose Big Bang or incremental for a single hospital implementation? A. Big Bang B. Phased per area or clinical unit C. Phased per EHR module NMH Roll-out Clinical Decision PHYSICIAN NURSING ANCILLARY IT Support Surgery All Results On- Line Foundation Technology Bedside Nursing Documentation Lab Order Entry Pharmacy System Electronic Medical Record Ambulatory/ Clinic Rollout CPOE with basic Decision Support (order sets, allergies) Electronic Medication Administration Record Leapfrog Test Select Focused Alerts Physician Documentation Ancillary & Procedural Documentation Radiology System Drug Interactions Dose Alerts Data Warehouse Incremental CPOE Adoption Less common as time goes by Meaningful Use incentives Significantly more implementation experience than 10 years ago Vendors have improved their support Risks include Moving too slowly may stop progress completely Missed information when partial paper, partial EHR Operational areas that have adopted will be ready for optimization, but IT resources will still be tied up in the implementation phase Challenge of Big Bang Go live resources needed 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 3

Pharmacist Involvement The #1 Design Consideration USABILITY Critical to the success of CPOE for medications Best understanding of the medication use process Appreciation for the provider and the nurse responsibility within the medication use process Need both informatics pharmacist input and clinical pharmacist input Pharmacist should have 100% responsibility for medication orders sentence build May be review of 3 rd party content Pharmacist should review all order sets with medications Order Build Guiding Principles Build orders from the physicians point of view But recognize paradigm shift in the medication use process Standardized and build most common choices into CPOE Hardwire the safest path (easy to do the right thing) Requireall fields, no abbreviations Side / site confusion Lock down fields when necessary If possible, keep responsibility with clinician best equipped to make the decision Role of nurse and pharmacist Order Sets Provide next level of CDS building blocks Group orders together with associated guidance Standardize evidence based care protocols and implement across all order sets Evidence based order sets large impact on quality and reportable measures Convenience is highly valued by clinicians Present opportunities to enhance safe and effective care Embedded notes and protocols Prompts for required activities Use of Order Sets for More Guidance Evidence-based Clinical Care Protocols Standardized Care Protocol 4

Unintended Consequences Which of the following would be considered an unintended consequence of CPOE implementation? A. Two doses of metoprolol 50mg PO BID scheduled within an hour of each other on the emar B. Missed TPNchange C. Increase in duplicate order errors D. More pharmacist time available to spend on clinical activities E. All of the above Unintended Consequences Eighteen studies (all except 2 involved CPOE) Categories More work for clinicians Unfavorable workflow issues Never ending system demands Problems related to paper persistence Untoward changes in communication patterns and practices Negative emotions Generation of new kinds of errors Changes in the power structure Overdependence on the technology McKibbon KA, et al. Enabling Medication Management Through Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 201. 2011. Increased Errors despite CDS Metropolitan Hospital Center with CPOE and CDS for allergies, drug drug interactions, drug duplication, dose range checking (Igboechi 2003) Overall medication errors were reduced by more than 40% Increase in therapeutic duplication problems Duplicate medication ordering errors increased after CPOE/CDS implementation (Wetterneck 2011) 48 errors (2.6% total) pre to 167 errors (8.1% total) post p<0.0001 Most post implementation duplicate orders were for the same medication Identical Order 15 to 69 (p<0.0001) Same Medication 13 to 75 Same therapeutic class 20 to 23 Implications for Pharmacist Workflow o The Good Things Decreased medication delays Improved turn around time from order to medication available to the nurse No lost orders Decrease in pharmacist distractions / interruptions ti Complete orders received (no missing information such as route of administration) Fewer phone calls from providers (formulary questions, how do I order drug X) Fewer calls from nurses (where is drug X) Fewer calls to providers and nurses (clarifications) 5

The Good Things Significant reduction in time pharmacist spends entering / transcribing provider orders Transcription phase is removed leading to decreased processing mix ups and transcription errors such as omissions i Immediate access to patient notes and labs allowing more informed clinical decision making during order verification Easy to identify who wrote to order when clarification is necessary Which of the following can be considered a negative consequence of pharmacists moving from order transcription to order verification? A. Speed B. Ability to alert providers with medication CDS C. Auto calculation of weight based dosing D. None of the above E. All of the above The Bad Things Errors are much more difficult to identify No longer a discrepancy between the chart order and the pharmacist order Wrong patient and pick list errors are easier to make Errors can reach the patient quickly Errors can spread easily (Med Rec) Pharmacist intuition paper orders occasionally had visual clues (incorrect units or misspelled drug) that a provider was not sure what they were ordering The Bad Things Providers are now responsible for decisions that pharmacists used to make Medication start times (problem should not be under estimated) Product formulation (piggyback vs IV push) Alert overrides MD put in an override reason that makes sense, but how do I know if he really evaluated the alert? Pharmacists become the default Help Desk for CPOE and emar issues The Bad Things Change in pharmacist cognitive requirements when transitioning from order transcription to order verification Verifying orders is much quicker, easier to miss a problem Pharmacists must pay as much attention to system and order entry errors as clinical issues Problem orders or clinical requests no longer have that paper visual cue Can get missed altogether or 2 pharmacists may duplicate efforts Possible over reliance on alerts MD saw the same alert so it must be OK Operations Opportunities / Considerations EXPAND PHARMACY SERVICES! No longer tethered to the pharmacy Pharmacists have more time Pharmacist order entry into CPOE vs the Pharmacy Information system Verbal orders Phone orders Protocol orders (Pharmacist to Dose) Pharmacist double check Routing to MD for signature 6

Medication Clinical Decision Support Challenges with CPOE Clinical Decision Support Override reasons Pharmacist responsibility if the physician overrides the alert Alert fatigue affects both physicians and pharmacists Alert overrides should be reviewed, but the number of overrides is not a perfect measure of success or failure MD assessments of eprescribing alerts Benefits Improve quality of care 78% Prevent medical errors 83% Enhance patient satisfaction 71% Enhance clinician efficiency 75% Action in response to alert tin past t30d days Modified a potentially dangerous prescription 35% Action other than discontinue or modify prescription 63% Problems Alerts triggered on discontinued medications 58% Alerts failed to account for appropriate combinations 46% Excessive volume of alerts 37% Conclusions EHRs and CPOE are here to stay Evidence that CPOE and CDS are effective in improving both process and clinical outcomes is growing These technologies are disruptive; we must adapt and change our practice with them Embrace the change and think creatively to improve your patients outcomes and engage your staff and peers in new ideas Weingart S et al. Arch Intern med. 2009;169(17). State of the EHR in the US 7

The Impact of CPOE and CDS on the Medication Use Process and Pharmacist Workflow Anne Bobb, RPh, CPHIMS 0121 9999 13 032 L04 P 0121 9999 13 032 L04 T Post Test Questions 1) Which of the following Health information technologies related to the medication use process are the most studied? A. CPOE (Incorrect: This is the second most studied) B. E Prescribing (Incorrect, though some recent studies incorporate large numbers of physicians) C. Barcode Medication Administration (This is the least studied) D. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) 1) There is strong evidence that CPOE and CDS improve process outcomes. A. True B. False (Incorrect Answer: the majority of studies looking at process outcomes are positive) 2) Order sets are a form of decision support that provide value in their ability to do all of the following except A. Embed prompts for required activities (Incorrect: Order sets are commonly used for admission and post op orders and provide a convenient way to prompt users to complete required work such as Med Rec or DVT assessment.) B. Standardize common care elements across different practices and clinicians (Incorrect: Building CPOE order sets is a great time to standardize care across the organization by creating subsets of medications approved by P&T. Examples include guidelines for pain and post op nausea and vomiting. C. Force providers to do what they are supposed to do D. Group orders together with associated guidance (Incorrect: Order sets are a convenient way to remind users to order a PTT when starting a heparin infusion. This is a more acceptable way to deliver the decision support than an alert.) E. Improve quality (Incorrect: Due to all of the above reasons, order sets are a common form of CDS used to improve quality and safety.) 3) Which of the following are considered an unintended consequence of CPOE implementation? A. More work for clinicians B. Problems related to paper persistence C. New kinds of errors D. Pharmacists spend less time on order transcription E. All of the above. 4) Drug duplication alerts work well for preventing therapeutic duplication errors in CPOE A. True (Incorrect: Though this makes intuitive sense, I am not aware of published literature showing that this is true.) B. False

5) Some of the workflow benefits of CPOE include all of the following except A. Improved medication turn around time (Incorrect: This is an expected benefit of CPOE) B. Complete orders (Incorrect: The separate fields in a medication order should be required, so pharmacists should receive complete orders) C. More physician phone calls to pharmacists for clinical advice D. Immediate access to more patient specific clinical information (Incorrect: This is more a benefit of an EHR, but E. Easier to identify the provider writing the order 6) CPOE implementations that extend over 6 12 months have been shown to be more successful than big bang implementations. A. True B. False 7) Identify a new type of risk associated with the change in pharmacist workflow that comes with CPOE. A. Orders entered on the wrong patient are easy to identify. B. A prescribing error is more difficult to identify because there are fewer visual cues when verifying orders than when transcribing orders. C. Pharmacists must make decisions regarding when to contact the prescriber about a potential medication issues, even if the prescriber saw the same alert that the pharmacist is seeing. D. All of the above.