Volume to Value. AMGA CMO Meeting April 3, Richard H. Bone, M.D. Vice President Medical Management Advocate Medical Group

Similar documents
Volume to Value. American Medical Group Association Las Vegas, Nevada March 24, 2015

Three C s of Change in the Value-Based Economy: Competency, Culture and Compensation. April 4, :45 5:00 pm

Accountable Care Organizations Creating A Culture Of Engaged Physicians

Advocate Physician Partners approach to Population Health

Connected Care Partners

Cultural Transformation and the Road to an ACO Lee Sacks, M.D. CEO Mark Shields, M.D., MBA Senior Medical Director

Beyond the Horizon: What s Next? Session PH6, March 5, 2018 Don Calcagno, President, Advocate Physician Partners

POPULATION HEALTH PLAYBOOK. Mark Wendling, MD Executive Director LVPHO/Valley Preferred 1

The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC): Improving Quality While Slowing Spending Growth

Next Generation Physician Compensation Design in a Schizophrenic Payer Environment

Saint Francis Care and Cigna CAC Meeting the Triple Aim Together

A Practical Approach Toward Accountable Care and Risk-Based Contracting: Design to Implementation

The Future of Healthcare Credit Analysis - Seven Emerging Ratios

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates

Physician Engagement

Health Reform and Medicare: What Does it Mean for a Restructured Delivery System?

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

Beyond RVUs: Changing Your Primary Care Compensation Plan from Volume to Value

Sharp HealthCare ACO. Presented by: Donald C. Balfour, M.D. President and Medical Director Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group

Intelligent Healthcare. Intelligent Solutions for Achieving Clinical Integration & Accountable Care. Case Study: Advocate Physician Partners

Thought Leadership Series White Paper The Journey to Population Health and Risk

Medicare / Accountable Care Organization CHS Finance Division CPE Day November 2, 2015

Complex Patient Care Redesign: ThedaCare Innovation. Gregory Long, MD Chief Medical Officer

Advocate Health Care. PURPOSE: Describe briefly the overall purpose of this position, i.e., Why does it exist?

CIGNA Collaborative Accountable Care

The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovations: Programs & Initiatives

Physician Compensation in an Era of New Reimbursement Models

All ACO materials are available at What are my network and plan design options?

Intro to Global Budgeting

Keeping Your Diabetes Education Program Stable In the Era Of Health Care Reform and Accountable Care Organizations

The influx of newly insured Californians through

Gateway to Practitioner Excellence GPE 2017 Medicaid & Medicare

Long term commitment to a new vision. Medical Director February 9, 2011

CLINICAL INTEGRATION DRIVERS, IMPACT, AND OPTIONS JOBY KOLSUN, D.O. MEDICAL DIRECTOR CLINICAL INTEGRATION LEE PHO

Healthcare Financial Management Association October 13 th, 2016 Introduction to Accountable Care Organizations and Clinically Integrated Networks

The Accountable Care Organization Specific Objectives

7/7/17. Value and Quality in Health Care. Kevin Shah, MD MBA. Overview of Quality. Define. Measure. Improve

New Strategies in Value Based Care

REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Health Care Evolution

New York State s Ambitious DSRIP Program

Physician Compensation Trends and Models. Boyd P. Murayama, MBA CPC CPC-I

Succeeding with Accountable Care Organizations

Leadership for Quality A Strategy for Marketplace Success. Requirements for Transformation. Typical State of Shared Vision. It All Starts With Urgency

Value Based Care An ACO Perspective

System Options to Achieve the Triple Aim

Transforming to Value: One Way Forward

Transitioning to a Value-Based Accountable Health System Preparing for the New Business Model. The New Accountable Care Business Model

ACOs the Medicare Shared Savings Program And Other Healthcare Reform Payment Methods

Medicare Shared Savings ACOs: One Organization s Lessons Learned. Gregory A. Spencer MD FACP Chief Medical Officer Crystal Run Healthcare LLP

Business Development in an ACO World, 2.0: Thank You. Is this your day? it s often mine. Driving Quality Growth in a Wellness Environment

Our Journey to the Acclaim Award. David Gano, MSOD Regional Director Ambulatory Performance Improvement

Building a Multi-System Clinically Integrated Network

Value Proposition: Tiered Network Plan Design for Navigator by Tufts Health Plan

Medicare Physician Payment Reform:

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

Value-Based Care Contracting and Legal Issues

Advocate Cerner Partnership Creates Big Data Analytics for Population Health

Accountable Care and the Laboratory Value Proposition. Les Duncan Director of Operations Highmark Health - Home and Community Services

4/10/2013. Learning Objective. Quality-Based Payment Models

A legacy of primary care support underscores Priority Health s leadership in accountable care

Rural and Independent Primary Care.

Aetna Better Health of Illinois

Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians

An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda

Health Policy Update 2017: The Evolution of Physician Payment. Declarations. Agenda 10/11/2017. Revised

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

2013 Physician Inpatient/ Outpatient Revenue Survey

Accountable Care Collaborative: Transforming from Volume to Value

The Cost of a Physician Vacancy

Basic Utilization and Case Management

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

10/20/2016. Working within the Value-Based World

Moving the Dial on Quality

MD, MBA, FACHE, FAAPL

Future Proofing Healthcare: Who Knows?

Payment innovations in healthcare and how they affect hospitals and physicians

Reforming Health Care with Savings to Pay for Better Health

Frequently Asked Questions

The Pain or the Gain?

MIPS, MACRA, & CJR: Medicare Payment Transformation. Presenter: Thomas Barber, M.D. May 31, 2016

Patient-Centered Primary Care

ACOs: California Style

Rebalancing the Cost Structure: Progressive Health Systems, Inc. Bob Haley, CEO Steve Hall, CFO

Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis

University of Iowa Health Care

building the right physician platform

Managing Faculty Performance and Productivity. Sara M. Larch, FACMPE VP, Physician Services Inova Health System. Overview

Population Health or Single-payer The future is in our hands. Robert J. Margolis, MD

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM

Operational Assessments: Utilizing Productivity Standards

Balanced Scorecard Highlights

CoxHealth: A Case Study in Launching a Co-Branded Medicare Advantage Plan

Quality Incentive Programs. By: Amy Yearwood RN, BSN Physicians Network Quality Manager Huntsville Hospital

Aligning Physician Groups to Maximize Managed Care Performance

Payment and Delivery System Reform in Vermont: 2016 and Beyond

Creating an Effective Physician Governance Within a Health System. Donn Sorensen, M.B.A., FACMPE President Mercy East Region

Evolving Rural Healthcare Environment Surviving the Crossing of the Shaky Bridge

Mission Health Care Network. April 2017

Transcription:

Volume to Value AMGA CMO Meeting April 3, 2014 Richard H. Bone, M.D. Vice President Medical Management Advocate Medical Group In times of change, learners inherit the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists. Eric Hoffer (Stolen from Gary Kaplan, his favorite quote) 2 1

3 Agenda Advocate Health Care Advocate Physician Partners Advocate Medical Group 4 2

Sites Of Care Advocate Health Care 12 Hospitals 11 acute care hospitals 1 children s hospital 5 level 1 trauma centers 4 major teaching hospitals 1 critical access hospital 2 Physician Groups 1,400 employed Home Care Company 3.4 Million Patients Served 34,000 Associates Total Revenue $4.9B AA Rating 5 MVP 6 3

7 Advocate Experience 8 4

POSITION (2013) Advocate Health Care leads the market annually, with: 190,300 total admissions (16.2% share*) 9,000+ pediatric admissions (10.1% share**) 2 MILLION hospital outpatient visits 2.8 MILLION medical group visits 459,495 emergency department visits 19,500 infant deliveries 9 * Six County Market Share ** Nine County Market Share The Finances Do Not Look Good 5

Health Care Costs Impact on Federal Budget 11 11 12 6

Unsustainable Cost Curve National Health Care Spending as a Share of GDP 17.6% 16.6% 16.0% 19.6% 12.5% 13.8% 9.2% 7.2% 5.2% 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2008 2009 2019P 13 13 Health Spending-Comparison Health Care Spending in Developed Countries, 2008 $7,538 $2,902 $3,129 $3,737 $3,696 $4,079 $4,627 $5,003 $1,801 PERCENT OF GDP i 6.5% 9.0% 8.7% 10.5% 11.2% 10.4% 10.7% 8.5% 16.0% 14 14 7

Annual per capita healthcare costs 3/25/2014 Costs By Age Categories Heathcare Costs by Age U.S. is spending much more for older ages $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 UK Germany Sweden US Spain $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age Source: Fischbeck, Paul. US-Europe Comparisons of Health Risk for Specific Gender-Age Groups Carnegie Mellon University; September, 2009. 15 15 Colonoscopies Explain Why U.S. Leads the World in Health Expenditures New York Times, June 1, 2013 16 8

Contextual Change Extraordinary price vulnerability 2012 Comparative Price Report (Average Prices) Spain United Kingdom France United States CT Scan Head $119 $175 $183 $566 MRI $230 $335 $363 $1,121 Hospital and Physician Cost Appendectomy $2,245 $3,408 $4,463 $13,851 Hospital and Physician Cost Normal Delivery $2,265 $2,641 $3,541 $9,775 Hospital and Physician Cost Knee Replacement Surgery $7,827 $7,833 -- $25,637 Routine Office Visit Physician $11 -- $30 $95 Total Hospital and Physician Cost Bypass Surgery Source: International Federation of Health Plans Link: http://www.ifhp.com/documents/2012ifhppricereportfinalmarch25.pdf $17,437 $14,117 $22,844 $73,420 17 WHY HEALTHCARE COSTS MUST BE REDUCED Taxes Copyright 2011 Kaufman, Hall & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. 18 9

Collision Course Decreasing Revenues Medicare Medicaid Insurers/employers Utilization Increasing Expenses Wages & Benefits Supplies Technology Infrastructure Investments 19 A Few Observations 1. Healthcare in America is unaffordable for patients, for employees, for state and federal governments 2. Solving the federal deficit requires a solution to the Medicare budget 3. There is a high likelihood that utilization of inpatient hospitals will decline precipitously over the next five to ten years 4. There is no revenue solution to the survivability of hospitals it is now a cost game and a care organization game Copyright 2011 Kaufman, Hall & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. 20 10

Contextual Change An unprecedented need to lower the cost structure of the industry. I am assuming that the future value of our existing cost structure is currently greater than the future value of our expected revenue stream. John Oliverio President Wheaton-Franciscan Healthcare 21 Advocate Ranked Largest ACO in U.S. with 553,000 Covered Lives! - 2013 Modern Healthcare Survey 11

Reimbursement Model Is Shifting 23 Value Based Agreements Contract Lives Total Spend Blue Cross 380,000 $2.0 B Medicare Advantage 32,000 $0.3 B Advocate Employee 22,000 $0.1 B Medicare ACO 106,000 $1.2 B Total 540,000 $3.6 B 24 12

Pluralistic Physician Structure Physicians on Advocate Medical Staffs = 6,000 Advocate Physician Partners (APP) = 4,500 AMG/Dreyer 1,200/200 Independent = 3,100 Non-APP = 1,500 26 26 13

Advocate Physician Partners Our Role: To Drive Improvement in Health Outcomes, Care Coordination and Value Creation Through an Innovative and Collaborative Partnership with Our Physicians and the Advocate Health System Condell PHO Christ Hospital PHO South Suburban PHO Trinity PHO Future PHO Good Shepherd PHO Lutheran General PHO Good Samaritan PHO Future Medical Group Dreyer Medical Clinic Advocate Medical Group Illinois Masonic PHO BroMenn PHO 27 27 What Is Clinical Integration? Collaborative effort by more that 4,500 Physicians (both Employed and Independent) and 12 Hospitals to drive Targeted Improvements in Health Care Quality and Efficiency through a Single Program to Improve Outcomes 28 14

How The CI Program Works Select top impact areas for employers & community: Chronic disease conditions & generics Benefits costs, absenteeism, presenteeism Utilize best evidence-based practices Establish performance targets annually Obtain contracts to reward improvement Provide physicians tools, training & feedback Develop physician progress reporting system Reward performance at end of year 29 Strategy for Transparency Timeframe Year 1 Activity External via Annual Value Report Internal via Annual Value Report and Organizational Level Reporting Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Blinded Comparative Overall Organizational Level Reporting Blinded Comparative Overall Physician Level Reporting with Outstanding Physician Performance Recognition Unblinded Overall Physician Scores within Metrics Unblinded Across All Organizations and Physicians 30 15

From Membership Partnership New Contract Models Require More Engaged and Committed Physicians Increasing financial interdependence Poor performance hurts all APP Pursuing Policies and Tactics Requiring More Integration Participation in All Contracts (incl. MSSP) Increased data sharing Participation in ECM Coordination of Care Programs Mandatory EMR implementation for IM FP by 2014 31 2013 Value Report To download a copy of the 2013 Value Report, go to: advocatehealth.com/valuereport 32 16

Show Me The Money Total Dollars Distributed 17

CI Flow Of Dollars HMO Surplus 2004 FTC Decree leads to CI Funding Payment based off of PPO Billings 2011 Shared Savings but Minus Infrastructure Costs 35 2013 APP Incentive Design Professional HMO Surplus Facility HMO Surplus CI Funding AdvocateCare Shared Savings Minus Infrastructure Costs and Deficits PCP CI Value Pool Specialist CI Value Pool Hospital Value Pool 36 36 18

Change in Incentive Distribution Increase relationship between value contribution and incentive distribution Continue transition to pay-for-performance Value contribution has several key components CI Score Care coordination Number of patients managed 37 Weighting of Domains Based on Point Allocation Chronic Care 24.7% Health and Wellness 18.7% Efficiency 22.9% Care Coordination 25.3% Patient Experience 8.3% 38 38 19

Use All 4 Guiding Principles To Revise PCP Incentive Create Single PCP Value Incentive Use Attributed PPO and HMO Member Months to Calculate PCP Incentive Opportunity Tier Physicians Using Individual CI Score and Care Coordination Score Reward Highest Tier with Higher PMPM Incentive Opportunity than Average Continue to Calculate Incentive Earned Using Individual and Site CI Score 39 PCP Distribution Performance Index: CI Score x Coordination Factor Coordination Factor: In Network Care x Patient Engagement in Care Management 40 20

PCP Distribution Differential pay based on Performance Index and Member Months for Attributed Patients 41 Rank PCPs by Performance 1. PCP Performance Score = 2 * Individual CI Score + Care Coordination Score 2. Physician E Example: CI Score of 85% and Care Coordination Score of 50% = 2 *.85 +.50 = 2.20 3. Rank Physicians High to Low on Performance Rank Physician Score 1 A 2.90 2 B 2.75 3 C 2.45 4 D 2.35 5 E 2.20 6 F 2.15 7 G 2.10 8 H 2.05 9 I 1.70 10 J 1.50 42 21

Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 3/25/2014 Create Three Tiers 4. Add Physician Member Months; Use 600 Member Months to Calculate Minimum Opportunity in 2013* 5. Create Three Tiers Having Equal Member Months 43 Rank Physician Score Member Months % of MM 1 A 2.90 2,500 2 B 2.75 900 33.4% 3 C 2.45 3,600 4 D 2.35 4,100 5 E 2.20 2,300 33.3% 6 F 2.15 600 7 G 2.10 1,700 8 H 2.05 3,300 9 I 1.70 600 33.3% 10 J 1.50 1,400 * Minimum Applies If Average MM Per Physician at the Practice Level Is Below 600 Allocate PCP Pool by Tier 6. Allocate Percent of PCP CI Pool So Tier 1 Has Highest PMPM Opportunity and Tier 3 Has Lowest Opportunity Rank Physician Score Member Months % of MM % of Pool 1 A 2.90 2,500 2 B 2.75 900 33.4% 40.4% 3 C 2.45 3,600 4 D 2.35 4,100 5 E 2.20 2,300 33.3% 33.3% 6 F 2.15 600 7 G 2.10 1,700 8 H 2.05 3,300 9 I 1.70 600 33.3% 26.3% 10 J 1.50 1,400 44 22

PCP Incentive Opportunity = Tier PMPM * Member Months Sample Physician Distribution Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Member Months 3,600 3,600 3,600 Tier Opportunity (pmpm) $ 9.64 $ 7.98 $ 6.28 Individual Physician Opportunity $ 34,704 $ 28,728 $ 22,608 Individual CI Incentive Opportunity (70%) $ 24,293 $ 20,110 $ 15,826 Individual CI Score 0.90 0.90 0.90 Individual CI Incentive Earned $ 21,864 $ 18,099 $ 14,243 Group CI Incentive Opportunity (30%) $ 10,411 $ 8,618 $ 6,782 Group (PHO/Medical Group) CI Score 0.85 0.85 0.85 Group CI Incentive Earned $ 8,850 $ 7,326 $ 5,765 Total Incentive Earned $ 30,713 $ 25,424 $ 20,008 Total Incentive Unearned $ 3,991 $ 3,304 $ 2,600 45 45 Specialist Approach for 2013 Identify Specialties with Greatest Influence on Population Health and Total Cost of Care OB/GYN, Cardiology, Orthopedic Surgery, Hematology/Oncology and Hospitalists Rank by Number of Unique AdvocateCare Patients (HMO, PPO & Medicare) at Specialty Level Patient Volumes Vary Across Specialties Increase Incentive Opportunity for Physicians Seeing Most Patients; Decrease for Physician Seeing Fewest Patients Refine and Expand for 2014 46 23

Incentive Opportunity Changes Based on Unique Patient Tier APP Board to Determine Percent Change in Incentive Opportunity* for Tiers 1 and 3 47 Rank by Unique AdvocateCare Patients Tier Physicians within Specialty Change to Incentive Opportunity* Physicians in Specialty 1 150 +20% Physician A Tier 1: Top Third 120 +20% Physician B 90 0% Physician C Tier 2: Middle Third 60 0% Physician D 30-20% Physician E Tier 3: Lowest Third 5-20% Physician F *Incentive Opportunity is based on allowable billings Sample: Variation in Incentive Opportunity by Tier* of +/- 20% Sample Specialist Physician Distribution Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Unique AdvocateCare Patients 150 80 20 Preliminary Individual Physician Opportunity $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Individual Physician Opportunity (+/- 20%) $ 24,000 $ 20,000 $ 16,000 Individual CI Incentive Opportunity (70%) $ 16,800 $ 14,000 $ 11,200 Individual CI Score 0.85 0.85 0.85 Individual CI Incentive Earned $ 14,280 $ 11,900 $ 9,520 Group CI Incentive Opportunity (30%) $ 7,200 $ 6,000 $ 4,800 PHO (or Dreyer/AMGMC) CI Score 0.90 0.90 0.90 Group CI Incentive Earned $ 6,480 $ 5,400 $ 4,320 Total Incentive Earned $ 20,760 $ 17,300 $ 13,840 Total Incentive Unearned $ 3,240 $ 2,700 $ 2,160 *Tier will be calculated each year based on unique AdvocateCare patients in specialty grouping. Incentive Opportunity continues to be based on allowable billings 48 24

APP s PCP Incentive Fund Design APP Primary Care Physicians Tiers Based on Individual Physician CI & Care Coordination* Scores Care Coordination Includes Percent In- Network Admissions and Care Management Engagement Factor Tier 1 PMPM Individual Physician Opportunity (120% of Tier 2) Tier 2 PMPM Individual Physician Opportunity Tier 3 PMPM Individual Physician Opportunity (80% of Tier 2) Distributed Based on Individual CI Score Distributed Based on Group/PHO CI Score 49 Individual Opportunity (70%) Group/PHO Opportunity (30%) = Individual Distribution + = + Group/PHO Distribution = Individual Physician Total Distribution + Residual Funds from Individual Portion + Residual Funds from Group/PHO Portion = Residual Funds Are Rolled Over Into General CI Fund and Available for Distribution the Following Year APP s Specialist Incentive Fund Design APP Specialist Physicians Tiers Based on Unique AdvocateCare Patient for 5 Specialties* in 2013 * 5 Tiered Specialties: OB/GYN, Cardiology, Orthopedic Surgery, Hematology/Oncology and Hospitalists Tier 1 Individual Physician Opportunity (120% of Tier 2) Tier 2 Individual Physician Opportunity Tier 3 Individual Physician Opportunity (80% of Tier 2) Distributed Based on Individual CI Score Distributed Based on Group/PHO CI Score 50 Individual Opportunity (70%) Group/PHO Opportunity (30%) = Individual Distribution + = + Group/PHO Distribution = Individual Physician Total Distribution + Residual Funds from Individual Portion + Residual Funds from Group/PHO Portion = Residual Funds Are Rolled Over Into General CI Fund and Available for Distribution the Following Year 25

Advocate Medical Group Advocate Medical Group Physician Led & Physician Run One Unified Management Structure for last 6 years Dyad Model 430 Physicians when created Now 1,200 Providers Compilation of Multiple Small Siloed Parts with Multiple Cultures and Compensation Plans 20% of Advocates $5 Billion Dollar Revenue 52 26

Number of Physicians 3/25/2014 The Advocate Medical Group Journey Group Optimization 2012-2013 Rapid Growth and Integration 2010-2011 Physician-led Governing Council 2009 Consolidated, Dedicated Management 2008 53 AMG Growth 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 27

Group Composition APNs/PAs 77 Family Medicine 149 Internal Medicine 151 Other Related Specialists 427 = Specialist (581) Cardiac Related Specialists 113 55 = Primary Care (489) What is the Role of AMG? Advocate Vision To be a faith-based system providing the best health outcomes and building lifelong relationships with those we serve. AMG Role A nationally-recognized, physician-led integrated group committed to delivering the best health outcomes. 56 28

Advocate Health Care Board of Directors Advocate Medical Group Governing Council AMG Regional Councils AMG Governing Council Committees Health Outcomes Committee Operational Improvements Committee Physician Engagement Committee Strategic Planning & Development Committee Finance Committee AMG Practice Sites/ Departments AMG Vice-presidents Medical Management/ AMG Vice-presidents Operations 57 Volume to Volume & Value - Aligning for Better Outcomes Three Components to Value Patient Experience Health Outcomes Service Area Operating Margin 58 29

Patient Experience Two Elements Site score (70%) Region score (30%) Based on Press CGCAHPS Survey Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems administered by Press Gainey Developed and approved by the Physician Engagement Committee 59 Patient Experience Distribution Patient Experience Scaling Targets Category Weight Minimum Goal Maximum Satisfaction Percentile - Site 70% 30 th Percentile 75 th Percentile 90 th Percentile Satisfaction Percentile - Region 30% 30 th Percentile 75 th Percentile 90 th Percentile 60 30

Health Outcomes Three Elements Individual Physician Clinical Integration score (70%) AMG AdvocateCare Index (20%) Patient Safety - AHRQ Regional Survey score (10%) Developed and approved by the Health Outcomes Committee 61 Health Outcomes Distribution Health Outcomes Scaling Target Scores Category Weight Minimum Goal Maximum Clinical Integration 70% 79 83 90 Patient Safety 10% 50 th Percentile 68 th Percentile 90 th Percentile AdvocateCare Index 20% 50 100 150 62 31

Service Area Operating Margin One Element Measured by Service Area Same goals as Service Area management Physicians will be assigned to a Primary Service Area Developed and approved by the Finance Committee 63 Value Measure Details 64 Value Measure Operating Margin Health Outcomes Health Outcomes Health Outcomes Patient Experience Patient Experience Element Operating Margin Service Area Clinical Integration Individual Physician AdvocateCare Index Corporate Patient Safety ARHQ Survey Regional Patient Experience Site Press Ganey Survey Patient Experience Regional Press Ganey Survey Element Percentage Frequency Scoring Period Meaningful Delivery 100% Monthly Annual Quarterly 70% Quarterly corrected summary Annual report after Nov 30th Annual Annual 20% Monthly Annual Annual 10% Annual Annual 70% 30% On demand / Monthly On demand / Monthly Six month rolling average Six month rolling average Annual After October Monthly Monthly 32

Clinical Compensation Year 1 Potential 5% upside Potential 5% downside Upside and downside consist of Health Outcomes 2% Patient Experience 1% Service Area Operating Margin 2% 95% of Clinical Compensation 100% of Clinical Compensation 65 65 AMG Hospitalists Salary Benchmarks Midwest Benchmark MGMA - SHM Today Hospitalist 33

Structure Three parts Base salary divided by 26 pay periods At risk component Bonus component Base Salary Productivity based. All Hospitalists are expected to reach a certain Productivity (RVUs) per year. Once a year reconciliation. If deficit, funds can be deducted from the at risk portion or the Bonus portion. 34

At Risk Component Average Length of Stay Citizenship Quality (CI Program) Bonus component Readmissions Patient satisfaction 35

Value In A Faculty Program Teaching RVUs Advocate Christ Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine Faculty Educational and Administrative Responsibilities (TRVU s) Expected score 6 PER QUARTER Faculty Responsibility Operational Definitions A Evaluation: Face to Face Face-to-face feedback at completion of rotation Tracked by turning in Face-To-Face Feedback Form within 2 weeks after end of rotation or documented in New Innovations Form will be stamped with date of receipt by program coordinator or designee Tracked by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. Activity Level TRVU <80% 0 >80% 1 100% 2 B Evaluation: New Innovations Timely completion of evaluations in New Innovations Defined by submission by due date. Monitored by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. C Evaluation: Mini-CEX Completion of mini-cex, with credit given after CEX form submitted to program coordinator or designee within 1 week of completion Form will be stamped with date of receipt by program coordinator or designee Tracked by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. <80% 0 >80% 1 100% 2 <80% 0 >80% 1 100% 2 D Conference attendance: Grand Rounds Attendance at weekly scheduled Grand Rounds Verified by sign-in sheets Entered into New Innovations/E*Value Tracked by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. Exception only made for vacation and illness <50% 0 50-74%% 1 >75% 2 36

Advocate Christ Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine Faculty Educational and Administrative Responsibilities (TRVU s), Con t. E Faculty Responsibility Conference: Resident Report Operational Definitions Attendance at scheduled Resident report Verified by sign-in sheets Entered into New Innovations/E*Value Tracked by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. Activity Level TRV U <50% 0 50-74% 1 >75% 2 F Faculty Development Attendance at Departmental Faculty Development Sessions Verified by sign-in sheets Entered into New Innovations/E*Value Tracked by Med Ed Program Assistant or designee. G Recruitment Conduct at least 10 interviews with residency applicant Submit completed Applicant Interview Form to residency coordinator or designee by 11am the same day Tracked by Residency Coordinator or designee. <50% 0 >50-74% 1 >75% 2 <5 0 6-9 1 >10 2 H Scholarly Activity Mentor for Trainee project or Personal Project, Publication or Outside Presentation submit completed Scholarly Activity Form to Med Ed Program Assistant or designee for tracking. Each activity 1 Version January 2014 Medicare Risk Score Scale 2012 2013 Risk Score PMPY Payout @ 250 Members Risk Score PMPY Payout @ 250 Members 0.95 to 0.99 $0.00 $0 0.95 to 0.99 $0.00 $0 1.00 to 1.04 $10.00 $2,500 1.00 to 1.04 $10.00 $2,500 VS 1.05 to 1.09 $20.00 $5,000 1.05 to 1.09 $20.00 $5,000 1.10 to 1.14 $30.00 $7,500 1.10 to 1.14 $30.00 $7,500 1.15 to 1.19 $40.00 $10,000 1.15 to 1.19 $40.00 $10,000 1.20 or greater $60.00 $15,000 1.20 to 1.24 $60.00 $15,000 1.25 or greater $80.00 $20,000 Incentive pays a $$ per MA member based on the average risk score of the PCPs MA panel New Achievement Tiers added for risk scores above 1.25 Max Payout increased from $15K to $20K 74 37

2013 MRA Incentive Plan Summary 2011 2012 2013 100% Individual Score 50 % Site & 50% Individual Score 100% Individual Score MRA Score Minumum Risk Score Needed for Paid Out 0.95 1.0 1.0 Max Payout $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 Attributed Membership Member attributed to PCP who saw them the most # of times in 7/12 6/13 If a member see 2 PCPs equally, the member is attributed to PCP last seen If there is no visit history in the attribution period, the member defaults to payor assigned PCP 2013 Incentive will be based on Risk Scores as of January 2014 75 Example Example A B C D E = Based on MRA Score F = C x E PMPY Site Physician Membership MRA Score Achievement 2013 Projection XXX A 87 0.92 $0.00 $0 XXX B 88 1.02 $10.00 $880 XXX C 512 1.07 $20.00 $10,240 XXX D 395 1.12 $30.00 $11,850 XXX E 241 1.17 $40.00 $9,640 XXX F 222 1.22 $60.00 $13,320 XXX G 250 1.28 $80.00 $20,000 Total 1,795 $65,930 2013 PMPY Risk Score PMPY 0.0 to 0.99 $0.00 1.00 to 1.04 $10.00 1.05 to 1.09 $20.00 1.10 or 1.14 $30.00 1.15 or 1.19 $40.00 1.20 or 1.24 $60.00 1.25 or greater $80.00 76 38

Point of Care (POC) Tool Provider MRN Patient DOB Advocate Medical Group - ORLAND PARK xxxxxxx Appointment Date 5/23/2012 xxxxxxx Appointment Time 2:00PM xxxxxxx Plan HUMANA MEDICARE 10/11/1922 - (89) Site ORLAND PARK HCC Category DX Diagnosis Name 2011 2012 LastServDt 131 55 92 585.3 CHRONIC KIDNEY DZ STAGE III (MOD) X 10/17/2011 296.30 RECURR DEPR PSYCHOS-UNSP X 8/15/2011 427.81 SINOATRIAL NODE DYSFUNCT X 10/17/2011 MRA SUSPECT LIST HCC HCC Description Abnormal Value Test Date 80 Congestive Heart Failure BNP=69 04/14/2012 77 Clinical Integration Measures Clinical Integration Measures Last ER Visit Congestive Heart Failure Wellness UTILIZATION Last Hospitalization Wellness Visit in Last 12 Months QUALITY PROGRAM NAME STUDY NAME Incomplete or Abnormal Measure LastService Next Wellness Opportunity 5/23/2010 08/26/2011 08/26/2012 ACE/ARB =No;BetaBlocker=None;Depression Screening =None; Alcohol Assessment=None;Smoking Assessment=None; CaseManager Conditions 2/10/2012 Rick.Bone@advocatehealth.com (708) 408-2444 - Cell 39