The Continuity of Care Maturity Model (CCMM) John Rayner Regional Director HIMSS Analytics

Similar documents
Continuity of Care Maturity Model Going Beyond EMRAM

CONTINUITY OF CARE MATURITY MODEL. James E., Gaston, MBA FHIMSS Sr. Director maturity Models, HIMSS Analytics

Measuring Digital Maturity. John Rayner Regional Director 8 th June 2016 Amsterdam

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

Value of HIT. Pat Wise VP, Health Information Systems HIMSS North America June 21, 2017

Model of Good Practice tools for risk reduction and clinical governance

IS IT WORTH TRYING TO GET TO STAGE 7? The vision of a big Spanish public hospital trying to increase IT value

ehealth in caring for people with multimorbidity in European countries

Jumpstarting population health management

Achieving Organizational Excellence Through Health

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

E-Health System and EHR. Health and Wellness Atlantic Access and Privacy Workshop June 27-28, 2005

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Advocate Cerner Partnership Creates Big Data Analytics for Population Health

IMPROVING TRANSITIONS OF CARE IN POPULATION HEALTH

Ontario Shores Journey to EMRAM Stage 7. October 21, 2015

Core competencies* for undergraduate students in clinical associate, dentistry and medical teaching and learning programmes in South Africa

THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY CareTech Solutions

Quality, Cost and Business Intelligence in Healthcare

Driving Business Value for Healthcare Through Unified Communications

Improving Patient Care through. Clinical Audit. A How To Guide

Health System Outcomes and Measurement Framework

The Pain or the Gain?

JOB DESCRIPTION. Clinical Nurse Specialist (Chronic Pain Management) Chronic Pain Service Department of Anaesthetics, Borders General Hospital

BETTER IT BETTER HOSPITAL?

2011 Measures 2013 Objectives Goal is to guide and support care processes and care coordination

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

The Value of HIT Latest insights from HIMSS and HIMSS Analytics

PCMH 2014 Recognition Checklist

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Care Management Policies

ehealth Report for Ed Clark November 10, 2016 My Background and Context:

Integrated Health and Care in Ipswich and East Suffolk and West Suffolk. Service Model Version 1.0

Potential of the use of electronic patient information for clinical research in the pharmaceutical industry

KPMG Digital Health Pulse April 2017

Introduction: Physical Therapy Utilization Management Program

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Tips for PCMH Application Submission

Current and future standardization issues in the e Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary

Achieving HIMSS Level 7 Implications for HIM. Children s Health System of Texas

HIE Data: Value Proposition for Payers and Providers

Health Information Exchange. Anne Dobbins, RN Operations Director Minnesota Health Information Exchange (MN HIE)

Discharge to Assess Standards for Greater Manchester

Provider Orientation to Magellan s Outpatient Behavioral Health Model

Pennsylvania Patient and Provider Network (P3N)

EMPI Patient Matching Solution Product Use Cases: Epic Electronic Health Record Integration

Managing Risk Through Population Health Initiatives

FIVE FIVE FIVE FIVE FIV

Digital Financial Services: Job creation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Increasing the Impact

Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL ) Certification Exam. Subdomain Weights for the CNL Certification Examination Blueprint (effective February 2012)

LESSONS FROM DIGITAL LEADERS

Transforming Care in the NHS through Digital Technology

Journey to HIMSS18: HIMSS Physician Community. JOHN LEE, MD CMIO, Edward Hospital and Health Services Chair, HIMSS Physician Committee

A Comprehensive Emergency Management Program

National Standards Assessment Program. Quality Report

Post-Acute Care. December 6, 2017 Webinar Louise Bryde and Doug Johnson

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

UK Renal Registry 20th Annual Report: Appendix A The UK Renal Registry Statement of Purpose

Overview of Health Information Exchange (HIE) Prepared by the HIMSS Health Information Exchange Steering Committee August 2009

HIMSS CEO Addresses Leveraging Information and Technology to Minimize Health s Economic Challenges Session # 96 March 6, 2018 Hal Wolf CEO, HIMSS

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

REPORT SUMMARY SHEET

HEALTHCARE TRENDS IN NORTH AMERICA ANDY TIPPET SR. MARKETING MANAGER HEALTHCARE, AMERICAS. ScanSource Smart VAR Conference August 21, 2014

the BE Technical Report

Medicare / Accountable Care Organization CHS Finance Division CPE Day November 2, 2015

Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment Toolkit A Tool for State Migrant Directors. Summer 2012

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

PPC2: Patient Tracking and Registry Functions

Decreasing Medical. Costs. Are your members listening to you? PRESENTED BY: September 22, 2016

Adopting Standardized Definitions The Future of Data Collection and Benchmarking in Alternate Site Infusion Must Start Now!

Foundational Informatics: INFORMATICS COMPETENCIES

Health Cluster Coordination Meeting. Friday December 4, 2015, Kiev

Document Details Clinical Audit Policy

Delivering the Five Year Forward View Personalised Health and Care 2020

Accountable Care Atlas

Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation

Measurability of Patient Safety

SUPPORT FOR VULNERABLE GP PRACTICES: PILOT PROGRAMME

Dr. Matt Hoffman, Chief Medical Informatics Officer

Member webinar: What is an ideal European Reference Network? Matt Johnson, EURORDIS 10 February 2016

Improving Hospital Performance Through Clinical Integration

Mitzi Cardenas Sr. VP/Strategy, Business Development and Technology Truman Medical Centers

NHS Bradford Districts CCG Commissioning Intentions 2016/17

Hospital Strength INDEX Methodology

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

The NHS Confederation s Decisions of Value

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual

Operationalizing Guidelinebased. Derek Ritz

2013 Call for Proposals. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF) Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Connecting Care Across the Continuum

Is there an impact of Health Information Technology on Delivery and Quality of Patient Care?

London CCG Neurology Profile

Nurse Managers Role in Promoting Quality Nursing Practice

Building a Better Home: Transformation to a Patient Centered Health Home. Anna M. Gard, FNP-BC Association of Clinicians for the Underserved

Reducing Hospital Admissions Through the Use of IT. Steven Milligan MD Medical Director of ACO Management Colorado Health Neighborhoods

CINAHL Complete & Nutrition Reference Center

Roadmap to accountable care: The chicken or the egg technology investment or clinical process improvement?

Enhanced service specification. Avoiding unplanned admissions: proactive case finding and patient review for vulnerable people 2016/17

Transcription:

The Continuity of Care Maturity Model (CCMM) John Rayner Regional Director HIMSS Analytics

HIMSS HIMSS Vision Improve health through the better use of technology and information.

Global presence and influence.. 1961 2012 2006 2009 2007 2014

EVENTS IN 2016

MEDIA EUROPEAN HEALTH IT NEWS AND VIEWS

ANALYTICS Provider Solutions Industry Solutions Maturity Model Assessments Stage 6/7 Validations and Mock Visits Best Practice Hospital Excursions IT Implementation and Benefits Realization Consulting Certified Educator Programme European Hospital Database Proprietary Market Research Maturity Model Consulting Market Reports and Executive Briefings Certified Educator Programme 3 European hospitals

Going beyond the EMRAM The whole system approach Recognising transfers of care Hospitals are not always at the centre Care is managed by several providers in a number of care settings

Continuity of Care What is it? Citizens perspective Non-disruption of my care as I move across care settings and care providers.

Continuity of Care What is it? Health care providers perspective: Alignment of healthcare resources, across care settings, coordinated in a way that delivers the best healthcare services and value possible for a defined population

Transfers of care

Some Enablers of Integrated Care Exchange of Information Culture and Leadership Procedures Funding Attitude to risk Patient choices Governance Clinical Practice Patient Engagement

Patient scenario - Ana Discharged home after routine surgery Poor pain relief No physiotherapy Delayed discharge summary Post op complication Anti-coagulants required

Patient scenario - Frank Contradicting directives No social care intervention Confused patient Poor medicines compliance No district nurse Fall Re-admission

Patient scenario - Robert Heart Surgery in Acute Care facility Discharged with no way to monitor heart rhythm Poor medicines compliance Weight gain Emergency Department visit and readmission to hospital

Some of the key barriers Separate information systems or ones that are not interoperable No single assessment process Money doesn t follow the patient Highly risk averse organisations Service users exercising absolute choice Clinical responsibility is not clear Unwillingness to transfer care Culture where is the power? 15

Coordinated Care Robert. Discharged with mhealth weighing scale Care coordinator explains best practice follow-up Weight tracked by technology, alerts sent if issues arise Care coordinator verifies adherence to medications and therapy regime Alerts for patient and core care team when problems arise Patient engagement is strong Consistent coordinated care and care across all care settings

CCMM Why do we do it? Provide orientation, knowledge, awareness What characterises good continuities of care Benchmarking How am I doing, how are my peers doing? Action and strategy What gaps do I need to close Global applicability and comparison Recognise that holistic integrated care is the gold standard

Copyright HIMSS Analytics CCMM.

Multiple Model Stakeholders.. Administrators CEO/COO/CFO/CSOs Forge agreements, policies, and standards that allow and enable progress Drive clinical activities that enable and enhance coordinated care, pop health Clinical/Medical Leaders CMIO/CNO/CNIOs Technology Leaders CIOs Build out Information & Technology that facilitates key strategies

Three perspectives

Governance Focus CCMM Governance Focus National and local policies are aligned. Policies address non-compliance. Best clinical practices are derived from care community healthcare data and operationalised across the community Policies in place for collaboration, data security, mobile device use, and interconnectivity between healthcare providers and patients Data governance across organisations Policies drive clinical coordination, semantic interoperability. Change management is documented and standardised Policies for CofC strategy, business continuity, disaster recovery, And security & privacy. Data governance is active Governance is informal and undocumented Copyright HIMSS Analytics 21

Clinical Focus CCMM Clinical Focus Comprehensive pop-health. Completely coordinated care across all care settings. Integrated personalised medicine Dynamic intelligent patient record tracks closed loop care delivery. Multiple care pathways/protocols. Patient compliance tracking Community-wide patient record with integrated care plans, bio-surveillance. Patient data entry, personal targets, alerts. Shared care plans track, update, task coordination with alerts and reminders. eprescribing. Pandemic tracking and analytics. Multiple entity clinical data integration. Regional/national PACS. Electronic referrals, consent. Telemedicine capable. Patient record available to multi-disciplinary internal and tethered care teams. EMR exchange. Immunization and disease registries. Limited shared care plans outside the organization. Leverage 3rd party reference resources. Basic alerts. Engaged in EMRAM maturation Copyright HIMSS Analytics 22

IT Focus CCMM IT Focus Near real-time care community based health record and patient profile Organisational, pan-organisational, and community-wide CDS and population health tracking Patient data aggregated into a single cohesive record. Mobile tech engages patients. Community wide identity management All care team members have access to all data. Semantic data drives actionable CDS and analytics. Comprehensive audit trail Aggregated clinical and financial data. Medical classification and vocabulary tools are pervasive. Mobile tech supports point of care Patient-centered clinical data presentation. Pervasive electronic automated ID management for patients, providers, and facilities Some external data incorporated into patient record. Data is isolated Copyright HIMSS Analytics 23

Methodology Defining the Whole System The population who s continuity of care is being profiled Client selected care settings 1. Primary Care 2. Acute Care 3. Home based Care 4. Urgent Care 5. Long Term Care Data collection Several quality assurance rounds Stakeholder by focus area discussions / workshops Data Analysis and Reporting Executive summary with scores On-site presentation of the results

SCORING TUTORIAL.. 7 Stage model, like the EMR Adoption Model Lowest is Stage 0, highest Stage 7 Compliance measured using a 5-point Likert Scale % 70% Overall and stage level achievement reported as a percentage Conveys overall achievement against requirements Color scale shows % achievement against each stage (from red to green) Shows areas of strength and opportunity Achieving a stage requires 70% or more compliance On that stage and all previous stages Your Stage standing is the highest stage achieved Accommodates different approaches in priorities, resources types, and execution of healthcare advancements Stage Progress (example data) OVERALL RESULTS Stage 1 Total Achievement 41% Stage 7 9% Stage 6 27% Stage 5 35% Stage 4 47% Stage 3 37% Stage 2 55% Stage 1 72% Stage 0 83% CARE SETTING RESULTS Stage 0 0 0 0 0 Total Achievement 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Stage 7 Stage 6 Stage 5 Stage 4 Stage 3 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 0 1 2 3 4 5 STAKEHOLDER RESULTS Stage 0 0 0 Total Achievement 0% 0% 0% Stage 7 Stage 6 Stage 5 Stage 4 Stage 3 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 0 1 2 3

Example Results Information Tech Stakeholder Achievements Stage Achievement: Stage 1 Overall Achievement: 33% Total 33% Stage 7 0% Stage 6 13% Stage 5 39% Stage 4 35% Stage 3 42% Stage 2 40% Stage 1 70% Stage 0 75% Information Technology Stakeholder Group Achievement Info Tech Primary Care Acute Care Post Acute Care Home Based Care Long Term Care Total 38% Total 55% Total 23% Total 22% Total 23% Stage 7 0% Stage 7 0% Stage 7 0% Stage 7 0% Stage 7 0% Stage 6 25% Stage 6 25% Stage 6 8% Stage 6 8% Stage 6 0% Stage 5 58% Stage 5 67% Stage 5 21% Stage 5 17% Stage 5 33% Stage 4 32% Stage 4 55% Stage 4 27% Stage 4 36% Stage 4 27% Stage 3 30% Stage 3 90% Stage 3 50% Stage 3 20% Stage 3 20% Stage 2 36% Stage 2 77% Stage 2 23% Stage 2 32% Stage 2 32% Stage 1 67% Stage 1 75% Stage 1 83% Stage 1 67% Stage 1 58% Stage 0 75% Stage 0 100% Stage 0 75% Stage 0 75% Stage 0 50% Copyright HIMSS Analytics 26

Example Results Acute Care Setting Achievements Acute Care Overall Governance Clinical Info Tech Total 40% Total 31% Total 48% Total 55% Stage 7 7% Stage 7 10% Stage 7 Stage 7 0% Stage 6 30% Stage 6 24% Stage 6 56% Stage 6 25% Stage 5 29% Stage 5 16% Stage 5 19% Stage 5 67% Stage 4 51% Stage 4 46% Stage 4 56% Stage 4 55% Stage 3 56% Stage 3 50% Stage 3 55% Stage 3 90% Stage 2 63% Stage 2 63% Stage 2 50% Stage 2 77% Stage 1 80% Stage 1 86% Stage 1 73% Stage 1 75% Stage 0 56% Stage 0 40% Stage 0 50% Stage 0 100% Recommendations Work with Info Tech Stakeholders to document and implement an overarching information and communications technology strategy Develop master patient, provider and facility indexes that are common Develop an overarching care coordination strategy, focusing on higher volume care settings and eventually extending into all care settings Develop care plans that can be shared and leveraged across all care settings as appropriate Build a patient-centered data repository supporting analytics, patient engagement, and coordinated care Aggregate clinical and financial patient data into repository, including some externally sourced data Further expand multi-level clinical decision support systems (CDSS) including into other care settings (e.g.: across acute care facility service lines, in all facilities) Provide actionable clinical decision support and advanced analytics (batch and on-demand), including drug interaction, age and sex appropriate findings, and diagnosis recommendations Copyright HIMSS Analytics 27

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Responsible Client Objective Define the population who s continuity of care is being profiled (e.g. all citizens in a certain geographic region, only citizens with chronic diseases, only citizens >65 years etc.) Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation Responsible Client Objective: Define the care settings that should be profiled. Currently proposed: Primary Care Acute Care Emergency Care Social/Home Care Please add a definition (or examples from facilities/tasks) for each of those care settings. Please note: HIMSS accepts a maximum of 3 different responses per capability requirement from within each care setting (e.g. you could have multiple hospitals within your Acute Care Setting that might have different capabilities in terms of Continuity of Care. HIMSS accepts to survey a maximum of 3 hospitals from this Acute Care Setting. The same applies to Primary Care, Long-term care, Home care etc.).

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance Responsible Client Objective Ideally each care setting nominates a representative from each stakeholder group (Clinical, IT, Governance) that completes the survey. HIMSS accepts a maximum of 3 different responses per capability requirement from within each care setting. On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Responsible HIMSS Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation Responsible Client Objective Completion of CCMM Checklist by relevant stakeholders Ideally each care setting nominates a representative from each stakeholder group (Clinical, IT, Governance) that completes the survey. HIMSS accepts a maximum of 3 different responses per capability requirement from within each care setting. Duration Maximum 3 weeks Administrative requirements Each respondent needs to have access to MS Excel

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation Responsible HIMSS (with support from survey respondents) Objective Merge all data into 1 database containing relevant responses from all 4 care settings and all 3 stakeholder groups. If multiple facilities within 1 care setting have participated (e.g. 3 hospitals for the Acute Care Setting) HIMSS will consolidate different responses so that only one ( average ) response is left per capability item. Duration Maximum 2 weeks (depends on how quick responses to clarification questions will be provided by participants)

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation Responsible HIMSS and Client Objective Discuss current status and challenges with relevant stakeholders. Clarify open questions from the survey process and achieve consensus about responses with all relevant stakeholders. Workshops will be separated by the 3 key stakeholder groups: Clinical, IT and Governance. Duration 2 hours (per Workshop), i.e. 6 hours in total (plus breaks). To be done in 1 day Audience Stakeholders from the different care settings assessed. Ideally have at least 1 representative from each care setting, separated by focus area.

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance Responsible HIMSS (with support from survey respondents) Objective Calculation of final Achievements (Scores) and preparation of Executive Summary, incl. recommendations. Duration Minimum of 1 day On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation

STEP BY STEP PROCESS Define Care Population Define Care Settings Define Stakeholders HIMSS distributes survey Completion Phase Quality Assurance On-Site Workshops Report Results Presentation Responsible HIMSS Objective Present the findings of the CCMM assessment to relevant stakeholders and enable a discussion around those findings and conclusions. Depending on the discussion HIMSS will make some updates to the final report. Agenda Review of methodology Facts & Figures about the organization Achievements & Recommendations overall, by stakeholder group and by care setting Wrap-up, discussion, next steps Duration 2 hours

Thanks!! John Rayner John.Rayner@himssanalytics.org +44 (0) 7798877252 @himssjohn