Range Clearance in Contingency

Similar documents
HUNTSVILLE. Chief, Military Munitions Design Center Ordnance and Explosives Directorate. Center, Huntsville 21 November 2013

ORDNANCE & EXPLOSIVES DIRECTORATE - HUNTSVILLE

WORKING INTERNATIONALLY SUPPORT TO THE WARFIGHTER

SUMMARY COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF CCW PROTOCOL V 1. Canada. REPORTING PERIOD: 01/04/2012 To 31/03/2013 (dd/mm/yyyy) (dd/mm/yyyy)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007)

HIGH CONTRACTING PARTY: Republic of Lithuania NATIONAL POINT(S) OF CONTACT:

UN/CCW Protocol V Norway 2009

OFFICE OF WEAPONS REMOVAL AND ABATEMENT BUREAU OF POLITICAL-MILITARY AFFAIRS

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 4, June 2013

IMAS First Edition 01 September 2007 Amendment 3, June 2013

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

REPORT BY THE STATES PARTIES TO THE AMENDED PROTOCOL- II TO THE CCW COVERING PERIOD FROM 16 AUGUST 2006 TO 15 AUGUST 2007 DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

Ministry of Defence Sudan Mine Action Programme IMSMA Monthly Report- February 2017

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Programmatic Update to NAOC

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 5, October 2014

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

JMAC-EST 19 March 2014

EOD Courses ATOM Training Ltd Courses 2018

Call For Proposals (CFP): Provision of Mine/Explosive Remnant of War (ERW) Risk Education in Afghanistan UNOPS Ref.: AFG/UNMAS/ /2017/004

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

FSC.EMI/174/17 30 May ENGLISH only

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) A Quick Look Threat Analysis

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTSVILLE CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1600 HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 3S

The Challenging Scope of the. Improvised Explosive Device Battlespace. Commander ADF Counter-IED Task Force Brigadier Wayne Budd.

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 20 JULY 1994

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Submissions

Defense Environmental Funding

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Procedures

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

REPORTING FORMS COMPLIANCE

Federal Facilities. Restoration and Reuse Office. NGA Working Group on the Cleanup of. 2 October 2008

Navy Munitions Response Program Explosives Safety Oversight

ESTONIA. National annual report

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

MINE ACTION SUB-CLUSTER

Munitions Response Program. PA/SI Overview

Battle Area Clearance (BAC): Guadalcanal Posted At : October 31, :24 PM Posted By : Admin Related Categories: UXO Guest Author Article

APPENDIX E. Resumes of Key Personnel

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

REDUCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF UNPLANNED EXPLOSIONS AT MUNITIONS SITES (UEMS)

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Convention on Nuclear Safety

Appendix I: Native Americans

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL ARTICLE 7 REPORT

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) ALBANIA

Environmental & Munitions Center of Expertise (EM CX) Information Fact Sheet US Army Corps of Engineers

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

SIGAR. CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY: DOD Has Limited Assurance that Contractors with Links to Enemy Groups Are Identified and their Contracts Terminated

UNMAS LIBYA: Humanitarian Mine Action and Arms and Ammunition Management

USACE Range Support Center

Joint & Coalition Operational Analysis Division Update

Department of Toxic Substances Control

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

Please proceed to the next page, after filling out the information below, and take the 25 pretest questions.

GAO MILITARY BASE CLOSURES. DOD's Updated Net Savings Estimate Remains Substantial. Report to the Honorable Vic Snyder House of Representatives

State Perspective of DoD MMRP PA/SI Program

CRS Report for Congress

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Military Munitions Support Services

Appendix D. Resumes of Key Personnel

4 Other Agency. Oversight

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

4 Other Agency. Oversight

SIGAR. $14.7 Million Warehouse Facility at Kandahar Airfield: Construction Delays Prevented the Facility from Being Used as Intended J U L Y

USMC CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION STRATEGIC PLAN

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

July 30, SIGAR Audit-09-3 Management Information Systems

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

EOD publications - overview

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

Ordnance Holdings, Inc. (OHI)

Technical Information Paper

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Homeland Security Recommendations Related to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Record of Decision Del Rey Oaks Munitions Response Area Track 2 Munitions Response Site. Former Fort Ord, California

Long term ERW management in Southeast Asia

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

HIMSS Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence Case Study Nebraska Medicine October 10, 2017

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Continue to Face Challenges in Tracking Contractor Personnel and Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND 250 DALLAS STREET PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

Fort George G. Meade and secure DoD facility former Mortar Range Site User Training Guide

STATEMENT OF MR. RAYMOND F. DUBOIS, JR. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)

USCENTCOM ENGINEER BRIEF

Lebanon Mine Action Center. Brigadier General Mohamed Fehmi

PROTOCOL V PREVENTIVE MEASURES REGARDING EXPLOSIVE STORAGE DURING MANUFACTURING AND DISPOSAL

FY2013 LTA - MARION ENGR DEPOT EAST

United States Air Force Explosives Site Plan Report and Explosives Safety Program Support Initiatives

FISCAL YEAR 2012 DOD BUDGET

Improvised Explosive Devices: Unclear Whether Culvert Denial Systems to Protect Troops Are Functioning or Were Ever Installed

REPORTING FORMS COVER PAGE

Transcription:

Range Clearance in Contingency Nicholas J. Stolte, P.E. Former Environmental Chief, U.S. Forces Afghanistan Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise Huntsville, AL 18 NOV 14 US Army Corps of Engineers

Topics Overview of the Mission Timeline of Events Range Clearance Process Regulatory Environment U.S. and International Policy Challenges Making a decision Successes

Overview of the Mission Afghanistan Range Clearance Mission is to clear all U.S. High Explosive Training Ranges (HETRs) of Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) by 31 DEC 15. Ranges to be transferred to Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) for continued use will not be cleared.

Timeline of Events Spring through Summer of 2013 Orders published requiring Regional Commands to identify ranges and input them into the database of record; the Combined Information Database Network Exchange (CIDNE) OCT 13 An 8 year old girl was killed while collecting scrap metal on a U.S. range. DEC 13 International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) published SOP 10614, Operation and Clearance of ISAF Ranges and Sites of Kinetic ISAF Engagements. DEC 13 USACE HNC awarded $48M Task Order on the Worldwide Environmental Remediation Services (WERS) MATOC for identification, survey, and surface clearance of ranges. APR 14 Article Published in the Washington Post titled, A Rising Number of Children Are Dying From U.S. Explosives Littering Afghan Land. Followed by increased senior level leadership and congressional visibility and involvement of the range clearance program. APR 14 COMISAF set a date for completion of 31 DEC 15. MAY 14 Draft language to authorize range clearance was submitted for inclusion in the NDAA FY15. JUL 14 HNC awarded 2 nd T.O. on the WERS ($250M) to complete surface and subsurface clearance. SEP 14 Continuing Resolution passed with a section to authorize the use of up to $250M for surface and subsurface clearance of U.S. ranges in Afghanistan.

Range Clearance Process Phase 1: Survey all U.S. High Explosive Training Ranges (HETRs) Determine the size and location of U.S. ranges scheduled for closure. Transferring ranges not surveyed or cleared. Phase 2: Surface Clearance Clear surface ERW to remove most immediate and accessible hazards. Receive Surface Clearance Certificates from the Mine Action Coordination Centre Afghanistan (MACCA). Perform geophysical investigation (data logging) to develop a heat map of potential subsurface contamination. Phase 3: Subsurface Clearance Initially no authority to conduct this phase. Planned to clear Defined Hazard Areas (DHAs) to a depth of one meter. Receive Clearance Certificates from MACCA.

Clearance photos

BUILDING STRONG

BUILDING STRONG

BUILDING STRONG

BUILDING STRONG

Regulatory Environment Mine Action Coordination Centre of Afghanistan (MACCA) and the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) are the regulators. There are published standards and processes for clearance: Afghanistan Mine Action Standards (AMAS). MACCA/UNMAS owned the process; wrote and updated AMAS. USACE HNC helped develop processes for range clearance. Contractors were accredited and licensed by MACCA. MACCA performs independent, 3 rd party Quality Assurance (QA). MACCA issues clearance certificates after completion and QA inspection.

U.S. and International Policy The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V) DoD Directive 4715.12, Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States. DoD Instruction 4715.08, Environmental Remediation for DoD Activities Overseas. CENTCOM Regulation 200 2, CENTCOM Contingency Environmental Guidance NDAA FY99 ISAF SOP 10614, Operation and Clearance of ISAF Ranges and Sites of Kinetic ISAF Engagements. DoD 6055.09 M, Volume 7, DoD Ammunition and Explosive Safety Standards: Criteria for Unexploded Ordnance, Munitions Response, Waste Military Munitions, and Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard.

Challenges Precedence Standards and processes were developed for mine clearance and new standards had to be written for range and battle area clearance. Digital geophysical technology had never been used for this purpose in Afghanistan. Political Existing policies and funding were determined to be inappropriate for range remediation/clearance in a contingency. Records No comprehensive database of range locations and areas potential range locations had to be identified and surveyed. Security Could not work in areas of high kinetic activity and experienced numerous kidnappings and threats from anti government agencies. Access Some ranges were still hot and could not be cleared until NATO forces no longer had a operational need. Scope Total range area to be cleared initially estimated to be 533 km 2 (about 3 times the size of Washington, D.C.) grew to approx. 850 km 2 Time COMISAF set a suspense of 31 DEC 15 Perception WaPo article and other media outlets created a negative perception.

Making a Decision Determination had to be made for subsurface clearance. All Defined Hazard Areas (DHAs) must be cleared to a depth of 1 meter per AMAS. Decision is where to draw the line on the DHA. Geophysical data is analyzed by the Contractor and HNC geophysicists to determine DHA. DHA reported to MACCA and original footprint is reduced in the database. Done in accordance with AMAS 05.01, Land Release.

Making a Decision Subsequent to the surface clearance, Geophysical data is collected and used to determine where subsurface hazards are; i.e., the DHA. Original Confirmed Hazard Area (CHA) is reduced to the DHA and the remaining land is released from suspicion of ERW hazards. DHA is cleared to a depth of 1 meter IAW AMAS and then is also released. MACCA issues clearance certificates for cleared areas.

Successes Annex A, Range Clearance Operations to AMAS 06.02 was developed by MACCA and USACE HNC to accommodate Range Clearance. USFOR A and ISAF leadership advocated with congress for authorization and funding. U.S. Law enacted (Continuing Resolution for FY15) to authorize surface and subsurface clearance and appropriate funds. Increased priority of mission resulted better communication and efficiency. Working relationship with MACCA and successful clearances led to more positive outlook from the Government of Afghanistan and the international community. Successfully implemented the use of geophysical data, for the first time in Afghanistan, to significantly reduce the subsurface clearance requirement.

Thank You.