Presented by: James Moose Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, LLP. With: Stephen L. Jenkins, AICP Michael Brandman Associates

Similar documents
CEQA Basic Training What is CEQA?

CITY OF ORANGE LOCAL CEQA GUIDELINES

COUNTY OF VENTURA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES

Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 As Amended

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.

RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program

4.b. 6/22/2017. Local Agency Formation Commission. George J. Spiliotis, Executive Officer

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplemental Revised Final. Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed United States

State Clearinghouse Handbook

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER WEST TOWER PROJECT

Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\PPA90 POLLUTION PREVENTION ACT OF 1990

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA 300 Richards Blvd. DEPARTMENT

CAIS Trustee Head Conference 2014 Developing a Successful Project Entitlements Team & Strategy

PART ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Ascon Landfill Site Announcement of Scoping Meetings and Public Comment Period for Notice of Preparation for Draft Environmental Impact Report

ATTACHMENT A. Nova Homes Residential Project. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City Council Resolution

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Policy Office. Upon publication of notice as final in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

Safety Zone, Barrel Recovery, Lake Superior; Duluth, MN. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone

coordination and collaboration between St. Mary s College and the Town of Moraga

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SUBCHAPTER III INDOOR RADON ABATEMENT

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund 2013Annual Report

CDBG Crosscutting Issues: Environmental Review

Subject: SRRA - DEP proposed rule to eliminate and delay mandatory timeframes inconsistent with legislative intent

Brevard County Public Schools Growth Management. School Concurrency Review Fees

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS and ENTITLEMENTS REPORT FOR the SFUSD ArtsCenter Campus

Chapter 5 CIVIL DEFENSE*

TABLE OF CONTENTS. SUBCHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 5: Statement of purpose 3 5: Definitions 3

Draft Community Outreach Plan for the Climate Action Plan Update

ORDINANCE NO

P.L. 2003, CHAPTER 28, approved March 10, 2003 Assembly, No (Second Reprint)

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO. September 14, 2010

SAN BERNARDINO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (SBIAA) CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES MANUAL. Page 1 of 34

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project

Crystal M. Craig, Local Government Analyst II LAFCO ANNEXATION 21 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA 134. (SPECIFIC PLAN 327)

ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE FORUM:

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM 1

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

The City of Oxnard invites qualified consulting firms or individuals to submit qualifications for On-Call Permit Processing Services.

I. Preamble: II. Parties:

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Public School Facilities Element (PSF) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

Your Development Project and the Public Works Department Part

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET, NW WASHINGTON, DC

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS (TYPICAL)

SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port of New Orleans (COTP New. Orleans), under the authority of the Magnuson Act,, established

This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited and referred to as the Emergency Management Ordinance of the Town of Brandon, Vermont.

APPLICATION PROCEDURE TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS IN CULVER CITY

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Purpose of Developer Fees. Developer Fees: An Overview of the Law and Recent Developments. Overview. September 19, Purpose of Developer Fees

City of Roseville and Roseville Economic Development Authority Public Financing Criteria and Business Subsidy Policy Adopted October 17, 2016

Safety and Security Zones; New York Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

CRS Report for Congress

HOUSE BILL M3, C5 9lr2951 CF SB 4 By: Delegate Niemann Introduced and read first time: February 13, 2009 Assigned to: Environmental Matters

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2877

ATTACHMENT A: DRAFT PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK

DPAS Defense Priorities & Allocations System for the Contractor

Part 11. TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING. Chapter 216. CONTINUING COMPETENCY 22 TAC 216.1, 216.3

SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is removing. the regulation for the safety zone at Snake Island, also known as

Downtown Oakland Specific Plan Frequently Asked Questions

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 400

BACKGROUND, PURPOSE & SCOPE 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions

CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

(132nd General Assembly) (Amended Senate Bill Number 37) AN ACT

Chapter 14 Emergency Projects

Local Emergency Planning Committee Responsibilities

MOOSE MANLEY LLP. September 30, 2015

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 484

REPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

SENIOR SERVICES AND HEALTH SYSTEMS BRANCH DIVISION OF HEALTH FACILITIES EVALUATION AND LICENSING OFFICE OF CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND HEALTHCARE FACILITY

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

Page 1 CHAPTER 31 SCREENING OUTREACH PROGRAM. 10: Screening process and procedures

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

California s Compliance Offset Program

CITY OF LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

Chapter 9 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments. Related to Sources of Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D013)

ANNEX 13 ESF-13 - LAW ENFORCEMENT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

SOURCE SELECTION AND BID PROTESTS: PRE- AND POST-AWARD CONSIDERATIONS. Daniel Forman Amy O Sullivan Olivia Lynch Robert Sneckenberg

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Kaiser Riverside-Cirby Medical Office Building Project

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Board of Directors Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Comprehensive Plan 2009

TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Transcription:

CEQA FUNDAMENTALS for LAFCo s Presented by: James Moose With: Stephen L. Jenkins, AICP Michael Brandman Associates 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 443-2745 Fax: (916) 443-9017 e-mail: info@rtmmlaw.com Sacramento Office: (916) 383-0944 Irvine Office: (714) 508-4100 e-mail: sjenkins@brandman.com

Opening Comments James Moose Goal of course: achieve a general familiarity with CEQA principles with special attention as to how they apply to LAFCos

Opening Comments Stephen L. Jenkins CEQA is an ART - not a Science CEQA is ONE tool in the decision process Does your Commission want you to be a LEADER or a FOLLOWER? Lead Agency AND Responsible Agency roles are BOTH a Double-edged Sword. Always beware of UNKNOWN Plaintiffs

What is CEQA? State law enacted in 1970 State law analog to the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) Located in the California Public Resources Code (section 21000 et seq.)

The CEQA Guidelines: Roadmap for Compliance 1. Legal effect of the Guidelines 2. CEQA Guidelines updates 3. Implementing procedures of individual agencies (each LAFCo should adopt them)

Purposes of CEQA 1. Information 2. Disclosure/Participation 3. Mitigation 4. Accountability

Procedure Analyze impacts in a public setting with input from other agencies and citizens Substance Mitigate impacts to the extent feasible

Who conducts environmental review? -- Agency planning staff -- Environmental consulting firms -- Agency staff and consultants

Determination of Agency Roles 1. Lead agency 2. Responsible agency 3. Trustee agency

The lead agency is the one with the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. The lead agency will decide how to proceed under CEQA and have ultimate responsibility for the process. OPR decides the Lead Agency if there is a dispute per Section 15053 CEQA Guidelines

LAFCo is the Lead Agency for: Incorporations and Disincorporations (see OPR Guide Oct 2003) Municipal Service Reviews (see OPR Guide Aug 2003) Sphere of Influence (see OPR General Plan Guidelines 2003 P. 187) Sphere of Influence AND Annexation??? (this is a grey area)

A responsible agency has some permit authority or other approval power over some aspect of the proposed project. A responsible agency relies on the lead agency s environmental document in its decision-making, provides comments to the lead agency in the CEQA process, and ultimately makes its own required findings regarding the analyzed impacts.

LAFCo is the Responsible Agency For: Annexations (with prezoning) (CEQA Guidelines 15051 (b) (2) Annexation AND Sphere of Influence??? (this is a grey area)

Responsibilities of Responsible Agencies: Lead Agency shall consult with Responsible Agencies before preparing document (CEQA Section 21080.3) Responsible Agency shall specify to Lead Agency the scope and content of environmental information that it needs (CEQA Section 21080.4 (a)

Responsibilities of Responsible Agencies (continued): The information specified by the Responsible Agency shall be included in the EIR (CEQA Section 21080.4 (a) During public review, Responsible Agency may identify significant impacts and propose mitigation measures (CEQA Guidelines Section 15204 (f)

A trustee agency is an agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project which are held in trust for the people of the State of California.

Three-step CEQA process for reviewing a proposal: 1. Is it a Project subject to CEQA? 2. What are its potential impacts? (Initial Study) 3. Prepare a negative declaration or an EIR?

What is a Project? Project is defined as activity approved by a public agency that may cause a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Discretionary: CEQA review is required for any discretionary project[] proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, including a large and open-ended list of activities, such as development permits, general plan adoption and amendments, and zoning activities.

A project may be: An activity carried out by a public agency (such as a general plan, policy, or regulation) An activity funded by a public agency; or An activity approved by a public agency (such as a housing subdivision or a conditional use permit)

What is an approval? Approval means a commitment to a definite course of action Environmental review should be conducted as early as feasible in the planning process -- early enough to influence design yet late enough to provide meaningful information

Is the project exempt? Certain types of projects are statutorily or categorically exempt from CEQA

Statutory exemptions Created by statute, not regulation; Generally apply regardless of the level of environmental impact; Major examples are: ministerial actions actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency closing of public school or the transfer of students to another school if resulting physical changes would be categorically exempt

Categorical Exemptions Created by regulation by Resources Agency pursuant to statutory authority; Apply to classes of discretionary agency actions supposed generally not to result in significant environmental effects Subject to exceptions that can defeat the exemption

Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions: Project will be carried out in a sensitive environment Cumulative impacts will result over time from successive projects of same type in same place Significant impacts will result due to unusual circumstances Project may result in damage to scenic resources Site is on a state list of contaminated sites Project may cause substantial adverse change to an historical resource

Common Sense Exemption Even if the project does not fall within a statutory or categorical exemption, CEQA does not apply if: it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines, section 15061(b)(3).) Use of this Exemption requires supporting evidence.

Procedural Devices: 1. Initial Study 2. Negative Declaration 3. Environmental Impact Report ( EIR )

Initial Study If the proposed activity is then -- a project, subject to -- discretionary approval and -- is not exempt the agency must perform an initial study to determine whether the project could have a significant effect on the environment. The lead agency must consult with all responsible and trustee agencies affected by the project.

If the initial study reveals no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that significant impacts may occur, then the agency can prepare a negative declaration instead of a full-blown EIR.

Agencies may adopt thresholds of significance as criteria for determining whether a given impact is significant Certain circumstances prompt mandatory findings of significance requiring preparation of an EIR Some projects automatically require an EIR (such as military base reuse plans or initial issuance of a hazardous waste facilities permit)

Environmental Justice Issues This is a NEPA Requirement created by Executive Order (Bill Clinton) This is NOT a CEQA requirement State has adopted policy suggesting that State Agencies address this topic See OPR Guide for Incorporation See OPR Guide for Municipal Service Reviews.

A negative declaration involves: 1. Public notice of availability 2. Public review period: 20-30 days 3. Consideration and approval of the negative declaration 4. Decision on the project 5. File Notice of Determination with Office of Planning and Research and County Clerk (triggers statute of limitations)

If the initial study reveals that significant impacts might occur, then the agency must prepare either a mitigated negative declaration or an EIR If the project proponent agrees to modify the project to reduce or eliminate any significant or potential significant impacts, the agency can proceed with a mitigated negative declaration The mitigated negative declaration must be circulated for public comment just like a negative declaration. Otherwise, the agency must proceed with an EIR.

Environmental Impact Report Notice of Preparation (NOP): When an EIR is required, the lead agency must prepare a notice of preparation which is distributed to all responsible and trustee agencies Scoping: After issuance of the NOP, the lead, responsible, and trustee agencies will consult to: discuss the proper scope of the EIR to provide assistance in identifying potential impacts and mitigation options The lead agency is not required to involve the public in this process, but often does

Project, Program and Master EIRS Project EIR: typical, single purpose EIR prepared to analyze a specific proposal Program EIR: analyzes the environmental consequences of broad policies or programs at the planning stage; more detailed analysis is prepared in subsequent documents Master EIR: similar to program EIR; used to analyze the impacts expected to result from a broadly defined planning or policy program; focused EIRs are prepared to provide more detailed analysis of specific projects that follow

A Draft EIR is prepared by the lead agency or by a consultant under contract with the lead agency. Treatment of environmental impacts: The EIR must focus on the possible significant environmental impacts of a proposed project; including cumulative impacts.

Treatment of environmental impacts: An EIR focuses on the project s possible SIGNIFICANT environmental impacts, including CUMULATIVE impacts.

For any significant impact, the agency must require feasible mitigation measures, or feasible environmentally superior alternatives to the project as proposed

Formulating Mitigation In devising mitigation measures, an agency may exercise only its EXPRESS or IMPLIED powers provided by law other than CEQA.

Deferred Mitigation: Speculative mitigation measures fail to satisfy CEQA s requirements Deferral of mitigation may be permissible to the extent that the agency commits to a realistic performance standard

Consultation with Responsible and Trustee Agencies The lead agency must submit the Draft EIR to all responsible and trustee agencies for comment Failure to comply with these requirements can invalidate the document

When the Draft EIR is complete, the lead agency must file a Notice of Completion with the Governor s Office of Planning and Research At the same time as it sends the Notice of Completion, the lead agency is required to provide public notice of the availability of the Draft EIR for public review and comment

The public notice is required to be: mailed to anyone who has previously requested notice in writing to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected, posted on and off the site in the area affected, and provided by direct mail to owners and occupants of contiguous properties.

Public Review and comment period: The lead agency must allow public review and comments for a period of at least 30 and no more than 60 days If the lead agency or a responsible agency is a state agency, the minimum public review and comment period is generally 45 days The lead agency must also make copies of the Draft EIR available for public review in its office and in all public libraries in the area affected

Recirculation Significant project changes or significant new information regarding the project, the environmental setting, or the impacts may trigger the requirement to recirculate the draft EIR for additional public review and comment

Preparation of the Final EIR : After the close of the public review and comment period on the Draft EIR, the lead agency must prepare a Final EIR. The Final EIR consists of: -- the Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft EIR; -- a summary or verbatim reproduction of the comments received; -- a list of commenters; and -- the agency s responses to significant environmental points raised

Responses to comments: The lead agency must consider public comments on significant environmental issues and provide a good faith reasoned analysis in response.

Consideration of the Final EIR Lead agency s decision-making body must independently review and analyze the Final EIR The lead agency s certification must be made on the basis that the document is legally adequate and reflects the independent judgment of the agency

Mitigation monitoring program: The agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program designed to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented. The mitigation measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures.

CEQA Findings Must be made for each significant effect identified in the EIR Findings must state that the impact is either: 1. Mitigated by project conditions or adoption of an alternative; 2. Subject to the jurisdiction of an agency other than the lead agency; or 3. Infeasible to mitigate

Statements of overriding considerations: If the lead agency determines that it is infeasible to mitigate a significant environmental impact, the agency must adopt a statement of overriding considerations. The statement of overriding considerations, as all the required findings, must be supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Notice of determination: Upon approval of the project, the agency must file a notice of determination ( NOD ). If the lead agency is a state agency, the NOD is filed with the Governor s Office of Planning and Research. If the lead agency is a local agency, it must file the NOD within 5 working days with the county clerk. All members of the public who have requested a notice must also receive a copy of the NOD.

Proper filing and posting of the NOD triggers a 30-day statute of limitations. Failure to file or post an NOD triggers a 180-day statute of limitations.

SUBSEQUENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL EIRS -- Post-certification of Final EIR. -- New information or substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding it (Pub. Resources Code section 21166)

Master Environmental Assessments MEAs catalog information that may be repeatedly useful for preparing CEQA documents Typically include physical and biological data that will be repeatedly relevant for future projects

Special Situations Redevelopment Projects Residential State Prisons Military Base Reuse Plans Environmentally-mandated Projects Reformulated Gasoline Certain Caltrans Projects

Functional Equivalents State regulatory programs may be certified by the Secretary of the Resources Agency Must meet specified criteria to be allowed to follow a simplified environmental review process Environmental review documents prepared by these agencies are called functional equivalents of EIRs

Appendix A to CEQA Guidelines

Questions and Answers