Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs

Similar documents
INDIRECT COST POLICY

Base. Base Determination and Cost Sharing. Bases represent the direct cost activities of an institution. Generally they consist of: 2/10/2014

Financial Administrator Development Program: Indirect Costs/Facilities & Administrative/Overhead

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Policy for Cost Sharing and Matching Funds on Sponsored Projects Effective July 1, 1998

Policy(ies) Superseded: ACAD 301 (portion) Revised: January 2016, March 2016, March 2017

Understanding F&A THE RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT NETWORK. Presented by. TRAIN at the University of South Florida

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS - UPDATE FEBRUARY 2015

Policies Superseded: ACAD 301 (portion) Revised: January 2016: March 2016

Indirect Costs/Facilities & Administrative/Overhead

Understanding F&A THE RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT NETWORK. Presented by. TRAIN at the University of South Florida

Guidelines for the Acceptance and Use of Externally Funded Grants and Contracts

COST SHARING POLICY COST SHARING POLICY PAGE 1 OF 8

Office of Sponsored Programs Budgetary and Cost Accounting Procedures

Cost Sharing Administrative Guidelines

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. AOA Conference Sacramento, CA January 12, 2014

Effective: April 1, 2016

STATEMENT OF POLICY PURPOSE

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

Vanderbilt University Policy for Cost Sharing on Sponsored Projects

7/1/16 - until amended - 9.1%

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SERIES: SESSION 2 BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP Amber Jensen Sarah Marcotte November 17 th, 2016

Financial Oversight of Sponsored Projects Principal Investigator and Department Administrator Responsibilities

Indirect Cost Information, Guidance, and Maximum Indirect Costs Worksheet

Division of Research & Graduate Studies. Office of Grants and Contracts

Academic Medicine Investment in Medical Research Results of AAMC Survey. NECA Conference September 29, 2015

Finding Funding, Budget Preparation, and Proposal Submission for Sponsored Research

UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. Budget Officers Meeting January 28, 2015

Finding Funding, Budget Preparation, and Proposal Submission for Sponsored Research

FAS and SEAS Policy on Assessments on Current Use Gifts and Sponsored Awards

University of Pittsburgh

Table of Contents. Introduction 2 How to Use This Guide 2 Best Practices for Budget Preparation 2

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION FORUM Allowable Costs. Uniform Guide

UC San Diego Policy & Procedure Manual

University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures

Cost Sharing Policy. Background, Scope and Purpose. Policy. Federal Guidance on Cost Sharing

GRANT MANAGER S HANDBOOK

SJSU Research Foundation Cost Share Policy

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE TRANSMITTAL FORM FOR EXTERNALLY FUNDED PROPOSALS

Office of Finance and Treasury. Office of Research and Project Administration. Cost Sharing in Awards. and I. PROCEDURE STATEMENT

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RULES FOR THE PERSONAL ACTIVITY REPORT SYSTEM (PAR)

Indirect Cost Policy

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200

Guidance on Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries

Writing a Proposal Budget: Lab

OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY 7A-4 COST SHARING POLICY. Responsible Executive: Gary K. Ostrander, Vice President for Research

Sponsored Project Personnel Effort Reporting Policy No. GSU: University Research Services and Administration

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT)

Table of Contents. Introduction 2 How to Use This Guide 2 Best Practices for Budget Preparation 2

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY OFFICE SPONSORED PROGRAMS. Matt Kluger, Vice President for Research & Economic Development

Northwestern University Key Effort Reporting Policies Introduction

Grant Proposal Endorsement Form

Gifts vs. Grants Implications for Indirect Costs

OMB Uniform Guidance: Cost Principles, Audit, and Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards

Grant and Contract Accounting

Accounting and Administrative Manual Section 100: Accounting and Finance

Cost Sharing: Management, Challenges, and Impacts Q&A Session June 3, 2013 Julie Schwindt, C&G Presenter

Financial Oversight of Sponsored Projects

National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Office of Grants and Financial Management Awards Management Division Updated April 15, 2014

An Explanation of Effort Classifications for Subsidiary Ledger Accounts and Support Accounts within TAMUS As Interpreted from OMB Circular A-21

Cost Sharing: Policy and Procedures

Indirect Cost Rates Frequently Asked Questions

Grant Administration Workshop. Research and Sponsored Programs

POLICY STATEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE

Post-Award Guidelines for HFSP Research Grants

Commonwealth Health Research Board ("CHRB") Grant Guidelines for FY 2014/2015

Brigham Young University. The Office of Research & Creative Activities (ORCA)

Award Transfer Guidelines

These procedures are issued in accordance with Research Policy 306, Cost Sharing.

Proposal Submission Guidelines

Fiscal Year 2013 Request for Proposals

AFOSR GRANTS OVERVIEW AFOSR. Air Force Office of Scientific Research. RINA MARTINEZ and MATT SLOWIK Air Force Office of Scientific Research

FAQs REGARDING HOPWA ADMINSTRATIVE COSTS AND RELATED ISSUES 07/20/2011

Level of Effort Reporting

Fiscal Year 2016 Request for Proposals

UC San Diego Policy & Procedure Manual

Guidance on Grant Award Transfers

Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) Grant Application Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the Supplemental Competitive Funding Announcement

Function Codes & Definitions

EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY. Sponsored Research Accounting Cost Share Guidelines

PREPARATION OF A SPONSORED PROPOSAL

Guidance on Allocating Real Estate Development Costs in the Neighborhood Stabilization Program

4.12 Effort Certification

Developing Proposal Budgets

SJSU Research Foundation

Grants Dictionary 2 CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part (c)(3) A-110 A-133 A-21 A-21 Certification Abstract

Medical School / University of Minnesota Foundation Faculty Research and Equipment Awards Program. Policies and Guidelines Updated December 2017

Policy on Faculty Effort Reporting Effective July 1, 1998

AAU Association of American Universities APLU Association of Public and Land-grant Universities

Sponsored Programs Roles & Responsibilities

Lawyers for Victims Program Funding Opportunity APPLICATION & INSTRUCTIONS WEBINAR

Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs Cost Sharing. Published 2010

Auburn University. Contracts and Grants Accounting

The OmniCircular - 2 CFR 200

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS JAMES H. ZUMBERGE FACULTY RESEARCH & INNOVATION FUND ZUMBERGE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH AWARD

Accounting and Administrative Manual Section 100: Accounting and Finance

Revised Policy on Indirect Cost Rates. for. Research Conducted. at the. University of Guelph

Research Administration at Emory Foundation Program DAY THREE: Sponsored Projects Administration

Subrecipient Monitoring Procedures

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

Transcription:

Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs UNLV s facilities & administrative (F&A) rate is set by the federal government as the amount of indirect cost recovery associated with supporting our research infrastructure. As a result, UNLV s policy is to apply the full applicable F&A rate to all sponsored projects in accordance with federal guidelines. The full policy can be found at http://research.unlv.edu/policies/ ( Facilities and Administrative Costs on Federally Funded Projects ). F & A Costs? F&A constitutes facilities (F) and administrative (A) costs to the university in order to support its research mission. These are real costs incurred by schools/centers and the institution in support of sponsored activities that cannot be directly identified with (and therefore charged to) a specific grant or contract. The costs result from shared services such as research- specific physical plant operation, maintenance, and utility costs; departmental, unit/school, and sponsored projects administrative expenses; federal compliance requirements; depreciation of buildings and equipment; and libraries. These are real and significant costs that are part of the university budget and must, therefore, be recovered from grants and contracts. The F&A costs recovered on grants allow the institution to build, maintain, and operate facilities that are dedicated to research and research support. It is the obligation of all researchers who use institutional facilities to bring in grant funding that supports their activities, along with the attendant F&A costs. F&A dollars received are not extra dollars but are part of the budget that is fully used to sustain the research enterprise. Without them, research laboratories and facilities cannot be built and maintained, nor could the infrastructure needed to apply for and administer grant funding. F&A costs are periodically reviewed and negotiated with our cognizant federal audit agency, the Department of Health and Human Services/Division of Cost Accounting (DHHS/DCA). The process involves an extensive proposal compiled by the university and submitted to the DCA. After careful analysis of our research funding and space utilization for research (see more details below), the DCA assigns UNLV an F&A rate that will be used for the subsequent several- year cycle. The exact same process is conducted at all other research universities in the country. Therefore, our F&A rate is based on a rigorous analysis from a federal- oversight body that determines the funds needed by the university to most effectively support federally funded research at UNLV. Types of Rate Categories There are three main types of F&A rates for the various types of projects that we undertake. The definitions below are taken directly from the federal circular OMB A- 21:

Organized research means all research and development activities of an institution that are separately budgeted and accounted for. Sponsored research means all research and development activities that are sponsored by federal and nonfederal agencies and organizations. This also includes activities involving the training of individuals in research techniques, commonly called research training, where such activities utilize the same facilities as other research and development activities and where such activities are not included in the instruction function. Instruction means the teaching and training activities of an institution. Except for research training, this term includes all teaching and training activities, whether they are offered for credits toward a degree or certificate or on a noncredit basis, and whether they are offered through regular academic departments or separate divisions, such as extended education, summer school, or extension activities. Other sponsored activities means programs and projects financed by federal and nonfederal agencies and organizations that involve the performance of work other than instruction and organized research. Examples of such programs and projects are health service projects and community service programs. Costs Covered F&A covers the costs of research that cannot be billed as direct costs to individual projects but nevertheless exist. Here is an alphabetical list of the goods and services offered at UNLV that are used by researchers but are not covered by direct costs in grants and are, therefore, directly covered by the F&A generated by our grants and contracts: Animal care and use. Central research administration. College/department research administration and support. Communications costs. Computing (IT) support. Economic development/outreach. Environmental health and safety. Equipment maintenance and support. Facilities and space usage. Faculty startup packages. Graduate student admissions and services. Human subject reviews (IRBs). Internal grants and awards programs. Library collections and services. Research integrity (compliance) office. Risk management (safety committees). Sponsored programs administration. Stockrooms. Technology transfer. Utilities costs of research facilities.

Collected F&A Although the cost components mentioned above help explain the need for F&A funding, some of the actual monies collected can be used to directly support research programs at UNLV. UNLV allocates 40 percent of the funds back to the colleges, departments, and researchers (this 40 percent is well above the national average), with the remaining 60 percent allocated to the vice president for research, the president, the provost, and libraries. The breakdown and uses are as follows: Vice president for research and graduate studies 48% Research administration Research compliance Sponsored programs Human subjects (IRBs) Animal care and use Graduate admissions Graduate services Faculty startups Discretionary support College, department, and PI 40% College research administration Faculty startups Discretionary support Faculty return President 4% Awards programs Major initiatives Provost 4% Faculty startups IT support Libraries 4% Library collections There is no campuswide allocation model for the 40 percent F&A return that goes to the deans. In most colleges, there is an allocation split between the college, the department, and the PI, which enables the PI to have a direct, discretionary account to support additional research costs, such as bridge support between grants, computers, software, professional travel, personal journal subscriptions, etc. PIs should inquire from the dean what the F&A distribution policy is within the PI s college. When F&A Must Be Used All federal research and service grants and contracts that do not have a policy restricting the allowed rate. All projects with commercial companies. All subcontracts from other institutions that are funded by federal or commercial grants or contracts that do not have a policy restricting the allowed rate.

The only situation where our federal F&A rate is not used is with sponsors that have a policy restricting the allowed federally based rate (i.e., have their own established rate). This policy must be consistent across all research universities. In such cases, the policy needs to be officially negotiated and filed with UNLV s Office of Sponsored Programs. Full/Partial F&A Waiver F&A waivers result in an underrecovery of indirect costs. Since F&A represents real costs, any unrecovered indirect costs must be covered by other sources. Some examples include operating budgets, tuition, and endowments. Tuition must be used to support instructional programs. Endowment income is for the most part restricted by the donors to purposes other than sponsored project support. Therefore, underrecovery results in significant impact on our operating budgets and our ability to provide funds to support research. Accordingly, UNLV must recover indirect costs whenever possible since researchers require administrative support for their activities. On- and Off- Campus Rates for Sponsored Programs During our F&A negotiations with the federal government, a distinction is made between those projects that are conducted on campus and those that are conducted off campus. While most projects should be considered on- campus, the determining factor for off- campus projects is whether or not university facilities are utilized. To help in determining the appropriate categorization, we have defined on and off campus as follows: On- campus F&A rate: The on- campus F&A rate will be applied to any sponsored project that requires utilization of space owned or leased by the university, university equipment, and university support infrastructure (i.e., both F and A components of the F&A rate apply). The on- campus rate, therefore, applies to most sponsored projects. Off- campus F&A rate: Off- campus rates imply that there are no facilities costs associated with the project, only administrative costs. Projects are reviewed in their totality, with the following criteria evaluated to determine if the off- campus rate applies: (1) The nature of the work and requirements of the award require that it be performed off campus (convenience or telecommuting are not justification). (2) Buildings and administrative work areas will be leased or purchased through the sponsored project for at least 50 percent of the project term. (3) The off- campus portion of the work must be continuous and occur over at least 50 percent of the project period of performance or will entail more than 50 percent of total salary costs paid directly by UNLV to project staff that do not reside on UNLV campuses. Note: Efforts undertaken by subcontractors are not a factor in the determination of whether an on- or off- campus rate should apply. In addition, because the university must maintain consistent procedures in applying the appropriate rates, split rates for the same project are strongly discouraged. However, if the principal investigator(s) can provide appropriate justification for splitting a budget to use both the on- and off- campus rates and the charges can be clearly separated into on- and off- campus categories, then exceptions may be made.

How F&A Rates Are Established F&A rates are negotiated in a set multiyear cycle with DHHS/DCA. Some of the factors involved in the negotiation are listed below. However, specific questions should be addressed to the controller s office: Total anticipated costs for all indirect services and facilities are computed. Modified direct costs (direct costs less equipment, major alterations, etc.) are estimated for three basic functions of university activity organized research, departmental research/instruction, and other sponsored activities. Total direct costs, with and without space costs, are distributed among the three basic functions (listed above) based on applicability of function, percentage of direct costs in each function, and functional purpose of space. The ratios of indirect costs to modified total direct costs result in two indirect cost rates for each of the three functions on campus (includes facilities costs) and off campus (excludes facilities costs). The indirect cost rates may be further adjusted to account for previous years over- or underrecovery of indirect costs. The ratio of indirect costs to modified total direct costs is the indirect cost (F&A) rate: Indirect cost rate = (indirect costs)/(modified total direct costs) x 100 How are F&A costs calculated for a project budget? Determine whether the project is organized research, instruction, or other. Determine whether the project is on or off campus. Determine if the project should use a TDC (total direct costs) or MTDC (modified total direct costs) indirect cost base. (Always use TDC for off- campus commercially funded projects.) If MTDC based, calculate modified total direct costs. Modified total direct costs are total direct costs minus the following: Equipment items having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. Alterations/renovations of more than $5,000. Patient care costs. The portion of subcontractor budgets in excess of $25,000 for each subcontract. Scholarship, fellowship, and tuition payments. Space rental for off- site facilities. The calculated MTDC should then be multiplied by the appropriate F&A rate to calculate the correct indirect cost to include in the proposal budget.

FAQ About F&A Costs Why are F&A costs so high? All of the indirect costs taken together are a significant portion of the university s expenses and are set by the federal government because they are required to adequately support research at UNLV. Without F&A funds, research programs at UNLV would be forced to make many painful cuts, which would reduce the ability to conduct research and attract future funding. Recovery of F&A costs isn t as high as it may seem. Instead of the 44 percent F&A rate set by the federal government, UNLV collects only about 20 percent in reality. This is because F&A costs for many educational projects and some federal and state grants are capped at a lower rate than the negotiated 44 percent, and most grants from private foundations do not allow full F&A costs. Compared with the rates of other research universities, UNLV s F&A rate is in the bottom half to third (i.e., most universities have higher F&A rates). Why should my grant pay F&A? Most sponsors already anticipate facilities and administration costs when they award a sum of money for a research grant. Therefore, F&A is not actually taking away from direct costs that could otherwise be covered. This is a long- held fallacy among principal investigators that is not shared by their funding agencies. Occasionally, private companies request that F&A costs not be charged to contracts that they wish to fund, but this cannot be agreed to by the university because these contracts require the same university support and services as do federal grants. In fact, agreement to waive F&A for private contracts would require support for those projects from F&A generated by federal grants. This would be a violation of the terms of our F&A agreement and would expose the university to potential audit findings from the federal government. Even researchers who obtain very small grants or use very little space and equipment incur F&A costs. In fact, small grants almost always require a greater percentage of the award than larger grants to support dedicated services to those grants. Although actual F&A costs incurred vary from researcher to researcher, it is important to charge an average. The costs of calculating and charging individual itemized F&A would far exceed the savings that could be generated for any one researcher and would in itself, therefore, drive up F&A costs. How is F&A applied to a research grant? F&A costs do not pay for 100 percent of all indirect costs but just that portion the auditors agree may be allocated to research activities. This percentage is applied not to the entire grant award but to the modified total direct cost. What are reasons for an F&A rate reduction? The agency in question has a set F&A rate ceiling. It is classified as off- campus research.

What are not reasons for an F&A rate reduction? The funding is too small to also pay F&A. PIs should always negotiate a funding amount that allows the work to be done plus full reimbursement for F&A costs. The company does not cover F&A. (Not true. All companies recognize overhead costs.) I need to get a foot in the door with the sponsor and then will pay the full F&A rate later with a larger proposal. This, in reality, does not work and leaves the university accepting a substandard F&A recovery rate from the funding source in question. Institutional fairness is the primary reason not to internally negotiate F&A reductions that are not based on the clear guidelines listed above. Any negotiated F&A rate reduction would require that the university supply that PI with required services that are paid for by other researchers who are paying the full F&A rate. Since the federal government negotiates the lowest rate possible, extensive granting of F&A waivers would result in fewer dollars for research support to all campus researchers, a result that is unfair to those who pay the full F&A rate. Because of this, the university has a firm policy of not granting F&A waivers except in clearly defined circumstances that are justified by our F&A policy.