May 17, To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. Step Two. fixed-guideway. Program. for. Background

Similar documents
To: From: Subject: Program continues to. Overview. the City of. Background. began the. As part of with both

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Executive Summary

LIGHT RAIL: IS ORANGE COUNTY ON THE RIGHT TRACK?

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Measure M2 Progress Report for January 2012 Through March Staff Report

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board. Update on the California High-Speed Rail Program Revised 2012 Business Plan

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Extension BART Phase II Project Update

REGIONAL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY PLAN

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearings

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Chief Executive Officer Action Plan - End of Year Report. Supplemental Info.

Eagle Project Update

Appendix B Meeting Presentation. PowerPoint Presentation Informational Boards

Streetcar Planning Update Dallas City Council Transportation and Environment Committee November 8, 2010

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project

Central City Line Kick-off and Tour

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Legislative Priorities

TAMPA BAY PUBLIC TRANSIT INITIATIVES: A Response to Questions of the MPO citizens advisory committee

Financing Transit Projects with Traditional and Innovative Sources And Mechanisms

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement for Construction of the Placentia Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Project.

Regional Core Circulator Study Final Report

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Long Range Transportation Plan

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

George Washington Region Scenario Planning Study Phase II

Diridon Station Joint Policy Advisory Board MINUTES

Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Route 3 South Managed Lanes Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

Construction of Peña Bridge - March 2013 Jersey Cutoff Bridge October Eagle Project Update. East Corridor Stakeholder Committee April 23, 2013

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Client: Boulder County Transportation Project: SH 119 Bus Rapid Transit & Bikeway Facility Design

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Gold Rush Circulator Study Charlotte, North Carolina REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line

PHILLIP A. WASHINGTON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

Part I. Federal Section 5310 Program

The Value of Metrolink in Relieving Peak-Hour Freeway Congestion

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

The New Incrementalism: Building and Financing US High-Speed Rail

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

Annual Report on Funding Recommendations

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

Lessons Learned for a Transit Public-Private Partnership. Phillip A. Washington, General Manager Regional Transportation District

Build America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation

~BEVE~Y AGENDA REPORT

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

Corporate Report. That Council endorse the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding; and

Technical Advisory Panel Report

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

METRO Blue Line LRT & METRO Green Line LRT (Light Rail) Table of Contents. Operating Grant Worksheets Pages 6-17

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

In This Issue CANCELED. and businesses. Meeting. regional recovery. Shelby Counties. The. commute, and 1-87-RIDEMA

NCHRP Tasks 20 and 25: Analysis of Rural Intercity Bus Strategy

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TOLEDO OH - MI URBANIZED AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

Fort Meade Regional Growth Management Committee BRAC TDM. Vanpool Boot Camp

Puget Sound Gateway Program

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

The RTD FasTracks Plan

Central City Line Steering Committee

Upper Darby Township 100 Garrett Rd. Upper Darby, PA 19082

SILICON VALLEY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR BART EXTENSION TO MILPITAS, SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Early Scoping Report Appendix Attachment B-5:

Smart Region Smart Transportation

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

MID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION.

Kevin Kidney, Kevin & Jody Sue Zuhke, OCTA Linda Johnson, City of Anaheim Felicia Adams, First Transit Jan Strickland, First Transit

Tentative Project Schedule. Non-Discrimination i i Laws. Para Preguntas en español

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

DRAFT METRO TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES POLICY I. POLICY STATEMENT

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

CREATING 21ST CENTURY COMMUNITIES MAKING THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR PLACE

Transportation Improvement Program for Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana for

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

Florida s Future: Funding Growth Through Public Private Partnerships. Ed Turanchik. March 10, 2014

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Developing the Pulse Corridor

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

City of Seattle Partnering Agreement. December 2017

Transcription:

May 17, 2010 To: From: Subject: Transportation 2020 Committee Will Kempton, Chief Executive Officer Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Overview The Go Local Fixed-Guidewaof the program, the City of Anaheim and the City of Santa Ana, in Program continues to move forward. As part of Step Two partnership with the City of Garden Grove, are underway with project development for the cities respective fixed-guideway projects. Staff has prepared an overview of progress made to date and the current status of each project for Board of Directors' review. Recommendations A. Direct staff to continue monitoring project development activities for the Anaheim Rapid Connection and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway as both projects progresss through the Go Local Step Two Program. B. Direct staff to continue to identify and pursue potential funding sources for the next phases of fixed-guideway project development, and ensure work being done on both projects does not preclude eligibility for such funding. Background In early 2006, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) initiated the Go Local Program to encourage cities to develop transit extensions to the Metrolink corridor. In 2008, the City of Anaheim and the City of Santa Ana, in partnership with the City of Garden Grove, each submitted a fixed-guideway concept as part of the Go Local Program that proposed a connection between the cities respective Metrolink stations to nearby destination/activity centers. In May 2008, the OCTA Board of Directors ( Board) determined that the concepts met the Go Local evaluation criteria and awarded each city $5.9 million for additional planning, including an alternatives analysis (AA), conceptual engineering, and state and federal environmental clearance. In January 2009, Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 2 the City of Anaheim initiated the AA process, and the cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove began that process in September 2009. As part of the Go Local Step Two award, OCTA entered into a cooperative agreement with both cities that outlined key milestones within the detailed planning effort in which the Board would review progress made to date. Prior to the Board s review of the cities first milestone completion later this year, staff has prepared a status update of the Anaheim fixed-guideway (recently named the Anaheim Rapid Connection) and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway projects. Discussion Anaheim Rapid Connection The City of Anaheim is underway with evaluating a proposed 3.5 mile east-west transit connection between the multi-modal transit hub, Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), The Platinum Triangle area, and Anaheim Resort. The project is envisioned to operate as a high-capacity system, providing transfers to the Metrolink commuter rail system, Amtrak, local fixed-route bus, future bus rapid transit (BRT), and high-speed train services connecting at ARTIC. This system will provide residents, employees, and visitors a connection between the Metrolink commuter rail system to Anaheim s major employment and activity centers in The Platinum Triangle and Anaheim Resort. To begin the AA process, the City of Anaheim started with a long list of alternatives, including 12 potential alignments and nine different technologies. Based upon a screening framework developed around the goals of the project and the input of the community, the 12 alternatives were refined to reach a short list of build alternatives which will advance through the state/federal environmental clearance process. The project alternatives being studied include: No-Build Alternative Includes all planned and programmed transportation improvements in the greater project area through the year 2035 and does not include any elements of the Anaheim Rapid Connection project. Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative Focuses on low-cost improvements to the project area s transportation system, such as enhanced local bus service, skip-stop and express service, improved traffic signal timing, and incentivized carpooling.

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 3 Semi-Exclusive At-Grade BRT Alternative Calls for BRT service operating at-grade on local city streets in exclusive lanes where sufficient right-of-way exists, as well as in mixed-flow traffic where existing right-of-way does not allow for a dedicated lane. Elevated Fixed-Guideway Alternative (with alignment variations and technology options) Considers a variety of automated fixed-guideway transit technologies, such as an automated people mover, monorail, and low-speed maglev for use along the alignment. Currently, the City of Anaheim is developing the technical studies and reports required to support the AA and environmental clearance. The AA project activities completed to date include, but are not limited to, purpose and need statement, ridership modeling methodology report, alternatives screening report, and cost methodology report. In addition, the project team is also performing technical studies consistent with both the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements, including, but not limited to, biological resources, geology and soil, hydrology and water quality, paleontological resources, growth inducement analysis, and utility report. In support of the CEQA and NEPA processes, the City of Anaheim hosted two scoping meetings in the summer and fall of 2009 as an opportunity for the public to learn about the project and to provide input on the technologies and alignments to be advanced through the environmental clearance phase. The City of Anaheim is expected to complete Step Two of the Go Local Program including environmental clearance in May 2011. Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed-Guideway The cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove are underway with environmental clearance of an approximately four-mile fixed-guideway transit system that would provide a new east-west transit line between the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and Harbor Boulevard. Specifically, the cities are studying the potential for a three-mile minimum operating segment that would run in a loop from SARTC to Bristol Street. This alignment would provide a linkage between SARTC and key areas along the corridor including the Station District, Civic Center, historic neighborhoods, and downtown Santa Ana. Consistent with the AA process, the City of Santa Ana has completed several key project documents, including the study corridor definition report, mobility problem definition report, goals, objectives and evaluation criteria, purpose and need statement, and definition of alternatives. The alternatives under consideration include:

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 4 No Build Alternative Consists of existing transit plans and programmed transportation improvements that have already obtained their project environmental approvals within the project study area. TSM Alternative Focuses on relatively inexpensive projects, operational improvements, or policy actions such as increases in existing bus service, improved signal timing, and incentives to carpooling. BRT Alternative Consists of a new BRT route that would provide a travel experience comparable to the fixed-guideway rail alternative. The service would operate in exclusive running lanes where possible without requiring right-of-way takes or causing impacts to existing traffic, as well as in mixed-flow travel lanes where space and traffic constraints do not allow for dedicated running lanes. At-Grade Fixed-Guideway Rail Alternative This alternative consists of a fixed-guideway rail system that operates on tracks embedded in the street pavement. The service would operate on tracks within a dedicated guideway within a mixed-traffic street environment typical of urban streetcar systems. As of preparation of this report, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is reviewing the project s Notice of Intent, which will invite the public to provide comments on the scope of the environmental studies. Earlier this year, the City of Santa Ana hosted two public listening sessions as an early opportunity for the community to weigh in on project development. The cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove anticipate having a completed environmental document in December 2011. Next Steps Based on current funding projections for Measure M2 revenues, additional funding sources are likely needed to supplement the next phase of the fixed-guideway projects. The most likely funding source will be the federal New Starts and Small Starts programs. In coordination with OCTA s Government Relations Division, staff will continue with regular coordination meetings with the FTA regarding the viability of pursuing funds under the New Starts and Small Starts federal funding programs. In addition, staff will continue to work with both cities to ensure that project development activities adhere to the federal guidelines for obtaining funds under the New Starts and Small Starts programs. As part of this approach, staff will also assist the project teams in identifying opportunities to accelerate the project schedules within the New Starts and Small Starts programs.

Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program Update Page 5 Consistent with the Go Local Step Two cooperative agreement with both cities, staff will return to the Board later this summer with a comprehensive review of the Anaheim Rapid Connection project s alternatives evaluation and in winter with a similar review of the Santa Ana and Garden Grove fixed-guideway alternatives evaluation. Summary Project development continues for the Board-approved Anaheim Rapid Connection and Santa Ana/Garden Grove fixed-guideway projects. Staff has provided an update on both projects for Board review as well as for approval to continue to pursue all eligible funding sources for the next phases of project development. Attachment None. Prepared by: Approved by: Kelly Long Senior Transportation Analyst (714) 560-5725 Darrell Johnson Deputy Chief Executive Officer (714) 560-5343