Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

2:17-cv RMG Date Filed 04/04/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. the Estate of NOLAN MICHAEL BURCH, Deceased, by their attorneys, Brewer &

9/21/2017 4:16:26 PM 17CV41502 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF MINE SAFETY COAL MINE RESCUE TEAM AGREEMENT

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :08:22 AM

H 7297 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

EARLY-CAREER RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP GRANT AGREEMENT

Case 1:08-cv TWT Document 1 Filed 09/18/08 Page 1 of 27

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

(4) "Health care power of attorney" means a durable power of attorney executed in accordance with this section.

Workforce Development Learning Center Course Outline. Haz-mat Level I FIP 3351

NAS Grant Number: 20000xxxx GRANT AGREEMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AUDITING SERVICES. Chicago Infrastructure Trust

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TITLE 47: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER II: ILLINOIS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PART 385 FORECLOSURE PREVENTION PROGRAM

V. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CSB:

EARLY-CAREER RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP GRANT AGREEMENT [SAMPLE Public Institutions]

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL AN ACT

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

The telecommuting option is not an employee benefit it is a management option that provides an alternative means to fulfill work requirements.

MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR THE ANALYTIC TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ROUNDTABLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF HENRICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE POLICY

A PERSONAL DECISION

Mandatory Reporting Requirements: The Elderly Oklahoma

Giant Tiger s Home for the Holidays Christmas Contest Official Rules

Aberdeen School District No North G St. Aberdeen, WA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 21 ST CENTURY GRANT PROGRAM EVALUATOR

PUBLIC BEACH & COASTAL WATERFRONT ACCESS PROGRAM. NC Department of Environmental Quality Division of Coastal Management

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Shire/ACMG Foundation Next Generation Medical Genetics Training Award Program

Case 3:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 30

CASE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO.

MERGING OF CITY OF NOVATO AND CITY OF SAN RAFAEL POLICE CRISIS RESPONSE UNITS

A PATIENT S GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVES. By Maureen Kroning EdD, RN

Health & Safety Policy DCP 017

SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH20205-MG-112 (03/24) Short Title: Enact Death With Dignity Act. (Public)

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

V Valor: Courage and bravery; Strength of mind and spirit that enables one to encounter danger with firmness

ADVANCE MEDICAL DIRECTIVES

World Bank Iraq Trust Fund Grant Agreement

VISITING SCIENTIST AGREEMENT. Between NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. And

DALLAS CYBER TASK FORCE. Standard Memorandum of Understanding. Between THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. and

RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT THIS RESIDENT PHYSICIAN AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made by and between Wheaton Franciscan Inc., a Wisconsin nonprofit

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

Planning Ahead: How to Make Future Health Care Decisions NOW. Washington

N EWSLETTER. Volume Nine - Number Nine September Why Wording is Important in Collaborative Practice Agreements

483.10(b)(4) and (8) Rights Regarding Advance Directives, Treatment, and Experimental Research

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. Senate Bill 519

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No: COMPLAINT

MASTER RELATIONSHIP AGREEMENT FOR THE OWNERSHIP, OPERATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ST. CROIX VALLEY BUSINESS INCUBATOR

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION

Small Business Enterprise Program Participation Plan

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0164. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Esquibel, Alden and Tipton and Senator(s) Job and Mockler A BILL. for

NYS PERB Contract Collection Metadata Header

TRAINING AWARD JOINT INDIVIDUAL/INSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION

Teaching Methods. Responsibilities

Health Care Directive. Choose whether you want life-sustaining treatments in certain situations.

Health Care Directive. Choose whether you want life-sustaining treatments in certain situations.

Case 4:10-cv Document 33 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

ADVANCE DIRECTIVE FOR A NATURAL DEATH ("LIVING WILL")

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT

Defence Act 1 of 2002 section 94(2)

~ Rhode Island ~ Durable Power of Attorney For Health Care Christian Version

Title 18-A: PROBATE CODE. Article 5: PROTECTION OF PERSONS UNDER DISABILITY AND THEIR PROPERTY

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED R E S E R V A T I O N P R O C E D U R E S F O R T H E R I T Z - C A R L T O N C L U B, L A K E T A H O E

CHAPTER TEXT: 1 of 30 3/23/2010 3:04 PM LAWS OF NEW YORK, 2010 CHAPTER 8

ATTACHMENTS A & B GRANT AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

ARIZONA HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE SAMPLE (LIVING WILL / HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY) John Doe

For more information and additional resources go to Name:

LOUISIANA ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE (Rhode Island Version) You must be at least eighteen (18) years of age.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME, INC., ET AL. **********

Goals & Objectives 4/17/2014 UNDERSTANDING ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVES (AHCD) By Maureen Kroning, EdD, RN. Why would someone need to do this?

Pfizer/ACMG Foundation Clinical Genetics Combined Residency for Translational Genomic Scholars FELLOWSHIP AWARD

COUNCIL OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS USA

ACCIDENT AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM (AIPP)

Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation IOLTA GENERAL GRANT PROVISIONS SEPTEMBER 1998

Case 1:14-cv WMS Document 8 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13

Lands and Investments, Office of

The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment this term involves treatments that may be considered

DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

ASSEMBLY HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: JUNE 13, 2011

Collective Bargaining Agreement. Cerenity Care Center Bethesda Care Center LPN Agreement. SEIU Healthcare Minnesota

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT

MARATHON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Texas Equal Access to Justice Foundation BASIC CIVIL LEGAL SERVICES (BCLS) GENERAL GRANT PROVISIONS

KENTUCKIANA DETACHMENT # 729 DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES AND HEALTH CARE PLANNING

ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND LIVING WILL

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health (Department), files this

The District of Columbia Death with Dignity Act (Patient Request for Medical Aid-in-Dying)

Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

- vs - Index No.I Assigned Justice John M. Curran. Respondents. Upon the annexed petition of Mary Holl, verified October 12,

Transcription:

First Amended Complaint By the Szymanski Koroll Litigation Group, Cynthia Szymanski Koroll, Cynthia Szymanski Koroll, #6380, The Szymanski Koroll Litigation Group, One Court Place, Suite 102, Rockford, IL 61101, 815.639.9000, 815.639.9066 - Fax. COUNT I WRONGFUL DEATH 740 ILCS 180 INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. and complaining of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., states as follows. 1. At all times relevant hereto, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and next best friend of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and ALEX O'CAMPO, a minor, was a resident of Winnebago County, Illinois. 2. At all times relevant hereto, the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC. was a home care specialist company providing home care services to catastrophic survivor patients. Defendant's place of business is located at 6707 North Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois, Cook County. 3. On or about April 12, 2005 INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. contracted with the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, to provide home care services and nursing care to her daughter, EVELYN ZAGAL. 4. EVELYN ZAGAL, a minor child, had a tracheostomy site on her body through which a trachea cannula was inserted. The tracheostomy and inserted cannula was necessary to maintain the airway of EVELYN ZAGAL. 5. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. hired EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER as their employee and allowed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to provide home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 6. On and about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL required observation and skilled nursing care to monitor her respiratory status and to maintain the patency of her tracheostomy cannula. 7. EVELYN ZAGAL's home was equipped with monitoring devices and life saving medical equipment ordered by her medical providers. 8. It was the duty of the Defendant, by and through its employees and agents, and apparent agents to possess and apply the knowledge and use the skill and care ordinarily used by reasonably well-qualified medical personnel in the same or similar circumstances as alleged herein. 9. That the Defendant, by and through its' employees, agents and apparent agents, including specifically, but not limited to: Edna Briggs-Gunther, Tamara Muller, and Celeste Clark, was negligent in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL in one or more of the following respects: a. Failed to observe that the patient had decannulated; Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 1

b. Failed to establish an airway before alerting a family member; c. Failed to establish an airway; d. Failed to promptly perform resuscitation when required; e. Failed to monitor; f. Failed to provide supplemental oxygen; g. Failed to avoid decannulation; h. Failed to continuously observe Evelyn Zagal; i. Failed to provide adequate nursing care to Evelyn Zagal; j. Failed to treat pain and discomfort; k. Failed to note evidence of suffocation; l. Failed to protect Evelyn Zagal from injury, m. Handled the child in a rough manner thus causing decannulation; n. Failed to comply with the Illinois Nurse Practice Act; o. Accepted the assignment to attend to Evelyn Zagal despite knowledge that she lacked the necessary nursing skills to properly attend to the child; p. Accepted the assignment to attend to Evelyn Zagal despite her sleepless state that prohibited her from being mentally alert to properly attend to the needs of the child; q. On information and belief was sleeping on duty at the Zagal home; r. Had consumed medications that affected her alertness and impaired her ability to attend to Evelyn Zagal; s. Misrepresented her qualifications regarding pediatric training; t. Failed to ensure qualified nursing personnel were in place to attend to the needs of Evelyn Zagal, a disabled infant. 10. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts or omissions, EVELYN ZAGAL suffered severe anoxia and multi-system organ failure and was declared brain dead and died on May 11, 2006 as a result of suffocation and asphyxiation. 11. The acts and omissions of employees, agents and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. including specifically, but not limited to: Edna Briggs-Gunther, Tamara Muller, and Celeste Clark, deprived EVELYN ZAGAL of an opportunity to survive or recover from her condition. 12. That EVELYN ZAGAL left surviving her mother and father, TERESA AND CARLOS ZAGAL who have been deprived of their child's love, affection, companionship, friendship, comfort and society and her brother ALEX O'CAMPO a minor, who has been deprived of his sister's love, affection, companionship, comfort and society. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, and next best friend of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and ALEX O'CAMPO, a minor, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT II FAMILY EXPENSE ACT 750 ILCS 65/15 (a) (1) INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 2

and complaining of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., states as follows. 1.- 11. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 11 of Count I as paragraphs 1 through 11 of this Count II as though fully set forth verbatim herein 12. As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the foregoing acts of negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was caused to incur medical expenses in an effort to be cured of her illness and injury and expended necessary expenses for the decedent's funeral, burial, and related services. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT III SURVIVAL ACTION INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. and complaining of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., states as follows. 1.-11. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 11 of Count I as paragraphs 1 through 11 of this Count III as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 12. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died and suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering, including but not limited to the pain of suffocation and pain and suffering due to lack of oxygen and to the death of the organs of her body prior to her death and had she survived she would have been entitled to bring an action for such damages and such action survived her death. 13. That pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/27-6, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, has the right to bring this survival action. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT IV (FOUR) RES IPSA LOQUITOR INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. and complaining of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., states as follows. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 3

1.-8. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 8 of Count I as paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Count IV as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 9. That on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL was a patient of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 10. That EVELYN ZAGAL was an infant incapable of monitoring her own tracheostomy site and ensuring its' placement and patency. 11. That EVELYN ZAGAL relied on INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC. to provide a nurse to continuously monitor and protect her tracheostomy site and to ensure the continuous placement and patency of the tracheostomy cannula and to specifically prevent decannulation and, in the event of decannulation to act immediately to restore the site and to resuscitate EVELYN. 12. That at all times pertinent hereto the duty to monitor the tracheostomy site was in the sole and exclusive control of an employee, agent and or apparent agent of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., namely EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, RN. 13. That the selection of the nurse to monitor the placement and patency of the tracheostomy site and cannula and to specifically prevent decannulation and, in the event of decannulation to act immediately to restore the site and to resuscitate EVELYN, was in the sole and exclusive control of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 14. That on May 9 at 11:00 pm through May 10, 2006 up to and including the time of the respiratory arrest of EVELYN ZAGAL, the nursing care of EVELYN ZAGAL was in the sole and exclusive control of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER an employee of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 15. While EVELYN ZAGAL was in the care of the employees, agents or apparent agents of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., EVELYN ZAGAL suffered severe and permanent injuries which resulted in her suffocation, severe suffering, death of her body organs and death. 16. That the injuries to EVELYN ZAGAL would not have occurred in the absence of negligence on the part of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., by their agents, employees and apparent agents, including but not limited to Edna Briggs-Gunther, Tamara Muller and Celeste Clark. 17. That the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., by its agents, employees and apparent agents including but not limited to Edna Briggs-Gunther, Tamara Muller and Celeste Clark had a duty to avoid negligence in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL. 18. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died and suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including the pain of suffocation and pain and suffering due to lack of oxygen and due to the death of the organs of her body prior to her death. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT V (FIVE) Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 4

NEGLIGENT HIRING, TRAINING AND PLACEMENT INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. and complaining of the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., states as follows. 1.-8. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 8 of Count I as paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Count V as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 9. That prior to May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER was hired at INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 10. That the only pre-employment in-person interview of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER was one conducted by INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., Scheduling Coordinator Nicole Stracka, said interview was conducted at a book store. 11. That Nicole Stracka is not a registered nurse. 12. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., had a duty to perform a background check on EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER prior to placing her in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL, a disabled infant. 13. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., had a duty to perform an investigation to determine that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER had adequate skills and training to monitor and manage the tracheostomy tube in the neck of EVELYN ZAGAL and to prevent decannulation and to act promptly in the event of decannulation and to resuscitate EVELYN if required. 14. That on May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER was not certified in Pediatric Advanced Life Support. 15. That prior to the care of EVELYN ZAGAL, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER had not previously provided home care to a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place. 16. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC., failed to provide skills lab training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER to train her in the home care, including avoidance of decannulation, treatment of decannulation and resuscitation of a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place. 17. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC., required nurses attending to EVELYN ZAGAL to be trained in IPI Vent and SCI training. 18. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. failed to provide IPI Vent and SCI training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER before placing her in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL. 19. That at the time of hiring and placement into the home of EVELYN ZAGAL, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER lacked the requisite skills and training to provide homecare services to a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place including skills and training in the avoidance of decannulation, treatment of decannulation and resuscitation. 20. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. did not require EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER to be certified in Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) prior to placing her in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 5

21. That employees, agents and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER also had employment as a nurse on the day shift at a Rockford nursing home. 22. That employees, agents and apparent agents of INDEPENDCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER claimed she had the daily responsibility for raising the children of her deceased daughter. 23. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., by and through its employees, including but not limited to Tamara Muller and Celeste Clark, had a duty to determine the fitness for duty of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER prior to assigning her to night shift duty at the home of EVELYN ZAGAL. 24. That Celeste Clarke, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. Director of Social Work and Director of Human Resources knew or should have known that on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER also had employment as a nurse on the day shift at a Rockford nursing home. 25. That Tamara Mueller, President of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER also had employment as a nurse on the day shift at a Rockford nursing home. 26. That agents, employees and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that EVELYN ZAGAL required diligent, constant observation and care to monitor her airway and tracheostomy cannula and to protect her from decannulation. 27. That Celeste Clarke, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. Director of Social Work and Director of Human Resources knew or should have known that EVELYN ZAGAL required diligent, constant observation and care to monitor her airway and tracheostomy cannula and to protect her from decannulation. 28. That Tamara Muller knew or should have known that EVELYN ZAGAL required diligent, constant observation and care to monitor her airway and tracheostomy cannula and to protect her from decannulation. 29. That agents, employees and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew prior to placing EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER has been reported to be sleeping soundly on the job. 30. That agents, employees and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER'S lack of training and skills created unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. 31. That agents, employees and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER'S propensity for sleeping on the job created unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. 32. That agents, employees and apparent agents of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER'S daytime job and home schedule prevented her from having the required degree of alertness on night shift and created an Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 6

unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. 33. That on or before May 9 and 10, 2006 Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., had a duty by and through its agents, servants, employees and nurses to exercise that degree of skill and care in the hiring, training and placement of Defendant EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL, as required of home health care services, servants, employees, agents and apparent agents in the same or similar localities. 34. That not withstanding the above mentioned duty, the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., by and through its' agents, employees and apparent agents including specifically, but not limited to: Tamara Muller, and Celeste Clark, committed one or more of the following acts of negligence: a. Failed to follow its' own policies and procedures in checking the references of EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER; b. Negligently hired EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER; c. Negligently retained EDNA BRIGGS -GUNTHER; d. Negligently placed EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER in the ZAGAL home; e. Failed to provide IPI Vent and SCI training ; f. Failed to provide Pediatric Advanced Life Support certification; g. Failed to provide training to EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER; h. Failed to provide specific instructions regarding the care of EVELYN ZAGAL; i. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when it knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was not so qualified, fit, adequately trained, or competent to render pediatric care to Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL; j. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when it knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was unfit for night shift duties as she was employed in a full time day position, had responsibility for the care of her grandchildren and had been found sleeping soundly on the job and utilized medications that impaired her alertness, therefore increasing the likelihood of her lack of attentiveness, sleeping and lethargy rendering her unqualified or unfit to perform pediatric nursing services exposing Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, to an unreasonable risk of harm. 35. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died and suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including the pain of suffocation and pain and suffering due to lack of oxygen and due to the death of the organs of her body prior to her death. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 7

COUNT VI (SIX) WRONGFUL DEATH 740 ILCS 180 EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER NOW COMES the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL as Special Administrator of the Estate of and complaining of the Defendant EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER states as follows. 1. At all times relevant hereto, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and next best friend of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and ALEX O'CAMPO, a minor was a resident of Winnebago County, Illinois. 2. At all times relevant hereto, the Defendant, INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC. was a home care specialist company providing home care services to catastrophic survivor patients. Defendant's place of business is located at 6707 North Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois, Cook County. 3. On or about April 12, 2005 INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. contracted with the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, to provide home care services and nursing care to her daughter, EVELYN ZAGAL. 4. EVELYN ZAGAL, a minor child, had a tracheostomy site on her body through which a trachea cannula was inserted. The tracheostomy and inserted cannula was necessary to maintain the airway of EVELYN ZAGAL. 5. That INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. hired EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER as their employee and allowed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to provide home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 6. On and about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL required observation and skilled nursing care to monitor her respiratory status and to maintain the patency of her tracheostomy cannula and to protect her from decannulation, promptly treat decannulation if it occurred and to resuscitate EVELYN if required. 7. EVELYN ZAGAL's home was equipped with monitoring devices and life saving medical equipment ordered by her medical providers. 8. It was the duty of the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER, a registered nurse providing pediatric homecare nursing services to apply the knowledge and use the skill and care ordinarily used by reasonably well-qualified registered nurses in the same or similar circumstances as alleged herein. 9. That the Defendant EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER was negligent in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL in one or more of the following respects: a. Failed to observe that the patient had decannulated; b. Failed to establish an airway before alerting a family member; c. Failed to establish an airway; d. Failed to promptly perform resuscitation when required; e. Failed to monitor; f. Failed to provide supplemental oxygen; Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 8

g. Failed to avoid decannulation; h. Failed to continuously observe Evelyn Zagal; i. Failed to provide adequate nursing care to Evelyn Zagal; j. Failed to treat pain and discomfort; k. Failed to note evidence of suffocation; l. Failed to protect Evelyn Zagal from injury, m. Handled the child in a rough manner thus causing decannulation; n. Failed to comply with the Illinois Nurse Practice Act; o. Accepted the assignment to attend to Evelyn Zagal despite knowledge that she lacked the necessary nursing skills to properly attend to the child; p. Accepted the assignment to attend to Evelyn Zagal despite her sleepless state that prohibited her from being mentally alert to properly attend to the needs of the child; q. On information and belief was sleeping on duty at the Zagal home; r. On information and belief had consumed medications that affected her alertness and impaired her ability to attend to Evelyn Zagal; s. Misrepresented her qualifications regarding pediatric training; t. Failed to ensure qualified nursing personnel were in place to attend to the needs of Evelyn Zagal, a disabled infant. 10. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts or omissions, EVELYN ZAGAL suffered severe anoxia and multi-system organ failure and was declared brain dead and died on May 11, 2006 as a result of suffocation and asphyxiation. 11. The acts and omissions of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER deprived EVELYN ZAGAL of an opportunity to survive or recover from her condition. 12. That EVELYN ZAGAL left surviving her mother and father, TERESA AND CARLOS ZAGAL who have been deprived of their child's love, affection, companionship, friendship, comfort and society and her brother ALEX O'CAMPO a minor who has been deprived of his sister's love, affection, companionship, comfort and society. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT VII (SEVEN) FAMILY EXPENSE ACT 750 ILCS 65/15 (a) (1) EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER states as follows. 1.- 11. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 11 of Count VI as paragraphs through 11 of this Count VII as though fully set forth verbatim herein 12. As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the foregoing acts of negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was caused to incur medical expenses in an effort to be cured of her Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 9

illness and injury and expended necessary expenses for the decedent's funeral, burial, and related services. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT VIII (EIGHT) SURVIVAL ACTION EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER, states as follows. 1.-11. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 11 of Count VI as paragraphs through 11 of this Count VIII as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 12. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died and suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering from suffocation and pain due to the death of her organs before her death occurred. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT IX (NINE) RES IPSA LOQUITOR EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER and complaining of the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, states as follows. 1.-8. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 8 of Count VI as paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Count IX as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 9. That on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL was a patient of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER. 10. That EVELYN ZAGAL was an infant incapable of monitoring her own tracheostomy site and ensuring its' placement and patency. 11. That EVELYN ZAGAL relied on EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER to monitor and protect her tracheostomy site and to ensure the continuous placement and patency of the tracheostomy cannula, to avoid decannulation, to promptly treat decannulation if it occurred and to promptly resuscitate EVELYN if required. 12. That the duty to monitor and protect the tracheostomy site was in the sole and exclusive control of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 10

13. That the nursing care of EVELYN ZAGAL, an infant child was in the sole and exclusive control of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER. 14. That on May 9 at 11:00 pm through May 10, 2006 up to and including the time of the respiratory arrest of EVELYN ZAGAL, the nursing care of EVELYN ZAGAL was in the sole and exclusive control of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER an employee of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 15. While EVELYN ZAGAL was in the care of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER she suffered severe and permanent injuries which resulted in her suffocation and death. 16. That the injuries to EVELYN ZAGAL would not have occurred in the absence of negligence on the part of the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER. 17. That the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER had a duty to avoid negligence in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL. 18. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured, suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering and disability prior to her death. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT X (TEN) WRONGFUL DEATH -NEGLIGENCE TAMARA MULLER NOW COMES the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL as Special Administrator of the Estate of and complaining of the Defendant TAMARA MULLER states as follows. 1. At all times relevant hereto, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and next best friend of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and ALEX O'CAMPO, a minor was a resident of Winnebago County, Illinois. 2. At all times relevant hereto, the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER was President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC., a home care specialist company providing home care services to catastrophic survivor patients. Defendant's place of business is located at 6707 North Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois, Cook County. 3. On or about April 12, 2005 TAMARA MULLER as Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. contracted with the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, to provide home care services and nursing care to her daughter, EVELYN ZAGAL. 4. EVELYN ZAGAL, a minor child, had a tracheostomy site on her body through which a trachea cannula was inserted. The tracheostomy and inserted cannula was necessary to maintain the airway of EVELYN ZAGAL. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 11

5. That TAMARA MULLER as Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, hired EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER as her employee and allowed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to provide home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 6. TAMARA MULLER, as Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC. permitted EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to provide home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL on or about May 9 and 10, 2006. 7. On and about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL required observation and skilled nursing care to monitor her respiratory status and to maintain the patency of her tracheostomy cannula, to protect her from decannulation, to treat decannulation if it occurred and to resuscitate EVELYN if required. 8. EVELYN ZAGAL's home was equipped with monitoring devices and life saving medical equipment ordered by her medical providers. 9. It was the duty of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER as a Registered Nurse and Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, to apply the knowledge and use the skill and care ordinarily used by reasonably well-qualified Registered Nurse and Chief Nurse Executive officers in the same or similar circumstances as alleged herein. 10. That the Defendant TAMARA MULLER was negligent in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL in one or more of the following respects: a. Failed to follow company policies and procedures in checking the references of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; b. Negligently hired EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; c. Negligently retained EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; d. Negligently placed EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER in the ZAGAL home; e. Failed to provide IPI Vent and SCI training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; f. Failed to provide Pediatric Advanced Life Support training to EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER; g. Failed to provide training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; h. Failed to provide specific instructions regarding the care of EVELYN ZAGAL; i. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was not so qualified, fit, adequately trained, or competent to render pediatric care to Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL; j. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was unfit for night shift duties as she was employed in a full time day position, had responsibility for the care of her grandchildren and had been found sleeping soundly on the job and used medication decreasing her alertness on the job, therefore increasing the likelihood of her lack of attentiveness, sleeping and lethargy rendering her unqualified or unfit to perform pediatric nursing services exposing Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, to an unreasonable risk of harm. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 12

11. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts or omissions, TAMARA MULLER as a Registered Nurse and as Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. allowed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to be negligent in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL and EVELYN ZAGAL suffered severe anoxia and multi-system organ failure and was declared brain dead and died on May 11, 2006 as a result of suffocation and asphyxiation. 12. The acts and omissions of TAMARA MULLER deprived EVELYN ZAGAL of an opportunity to survive or recover from her condition. 13. That EVELYN ZAGAL left surviving her mother and father, TERESA AND CARLOS ZAGAL who have been deprived of their child's love, affection, companionship, friendship, comfort and society and her brother ALEX O'CAMPO a minor who has been deprived of his sister's love, affection, companionship, comfort and society. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, TAMARA MULLLER n a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XI (ELEVEN) FAMILY EXPENSE ACT 750 ILCS 65/15 (a) (1) TAMARA MULLER O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER states as follows. 1.-12. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 12 of Count X as paragraphs 1 through 12 of this Count XI as though fully set forth verbatim herein 13. As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the foregoing acts of negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was caused to incur medical expenses in an effort to be cured of her illness and injury and expended necessary expenses for the decedent's funeral, burial, and related services. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XII (TWELVE) SURVIVAL ACTION TAMARA MULLER O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER, states as follows. 1.-12. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 12 of Count X as paragraphs 1 through 12 of this Count XII as though fully set forth verbatim herein. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 13

13. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died, suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain her pain and suffering from suffocation and pain due to the death of her organs before her death occurred and had she survived she would have been entitled to bring an action for such damages and such action survived her death. 14. That pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/27-6, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL individually and as Executor of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, has the right to bring this survival action. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER, in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XIII (THIRTEEN) RES IPSA LOQUITOR TAMARA MULLER and complaining of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER states as follows. 1.-9. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 9 of Count X as paragraphs through 9 of this Count XIII as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 10. That on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 TAMARA MULLER permitted EVELYN ZAGAL to be a patient of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER. 11. That EVELYN ZAGAL was an infant incapable of monitoring her own tracheostomy site and ensuring its' placement and patency. 12. That EVELYN ZAGAL relied on TAMARA MULLER to provide a homecare nurse to monitor her tracheostomy site and to ensure the continuous placement and patency of the tracheostomy cannula.: 13. That TAMARA MULLER as a Registered Nurse and Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. had in her sole and exclusive control the right to assign EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER to the nursing care of EVELYN ZAGAL, an infant child. 14. That on May 9, 2006 at 11:00 pm through May 10, 2006 up to and including the i time of the respiratory arrest of EVELYN ZAGAL, the nursing care of EVELYN ZAGAL was in the sole and exclusive control of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER an agent, employee or apparent agent of TAMARA MULLER. 15. While EVELYN ZAGAL was in the care of EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER she suffered severe and permanent injuries which resulted in her suffocation and death. 16. That the injuries to EVELYN ZAGAL would not have occurred in the absence of negligence on the part of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER. 17. That the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER had a duty to avoid negligence in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 14

18. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured, suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering and disability prior to her death. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XIV (FOURTEEN) NEGLIGENT HIRING, TRAINING AND PLACEMENT TAMARA MULLER and complaining of the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER, states as follows. 1.-8. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 8 of Count X as paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Count XIV as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 9. That prior to May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER was hired at INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 10. That the only pre-employment in person interview of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER was one conducted by INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. Scheduling Coordinator Nicole Stracka. 11. That Nicole Stracka is not a registered nurse. 12. That TAMARA MULLER had a duty to perform a background check on EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER prior to placing her in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL, a disabled infant. 13. That TAMARA MULLER had a duty to perform an investigation to determine that EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER had adequate skills and training to monitor and manage the tracheostomy tube in the neck of EVELYN ZAGAL and to protect EVELYN from injury from decannulation and to resuscitate EVELYN if required. 14. That at the time of hiring and placement into the home of EVELYN ZAGAL, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER lacked the requisite skills and training to provide homecare services to home care to a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place. 15. That TAMARA MULLER had a duty to determine the fitness for duty of EDNA-BRIGGS GUNTHER prior to assigning her to night shift duty at the home of EVELYN ZAGAL. 16. That TAMARA MULLER allowed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to work at the ZAGAL home on May 9 and 10, 2006. 17. That TAMARA MULLER, as a Registered Nurse and Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC, endorsed the placement of EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER in the ZAGAL home to provide homecare services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 18. That TAMARA MULLER as a Registered Nurse and the Owner, President and Chief Nurse Executive of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. knew or should have known that on or about May 9 and 10, 2006 EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER also was employed full time on the day shift at a Rockford nursing home. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 15

19. That TAMARA MULLER knew or should have known that EVELYN ZAGAL required diligent, constant observation and care to monitor her airway and tracheostomy cannula and to protect her from injury due to decannulation. 20. That TAMARA MULLER knew prior to her endorsement of the placement of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL that EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER had been reported on INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. job evaluation to be sleeping soundly on the job. 21. That TAMARA MULLER knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER'S lack of training and skills created unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. 23. That TAMARA MULLER knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER'S propensity for sleeping on the job created an unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. 24. That TAMARA MULLER knew or should have known that EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER'S daytime job and home schedule prevented her from having the required degree of alertness on night shift and created an unfitness for the position of homecare nurse to EVELYN ZAGAL so as to create a danger of harm to EVELYN ZAGAL. That EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER was not certified in Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS). 25. That prior to the care of EVELYN ZAGAL, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER had not provided home care to a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place. 26. That TAMARA MULLER failed to provide skills lab training to EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to train her in the home care to a pediatric hygroma patient who had a tracheostomy cannula in place. 27. That TAMARA MULLER required nurses attending to EVELYN ZAGAL to be trained in IPI Vent and SCI training. 28. That TAMARA MULLER failed to provide IPI Vent and SCI training to EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER before placing her in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL. 29. That on or before May 9 and 10, 2006 Defendant, TAMARA MULLER as a Registered Nurse and chief nurse executive had a duty to exercise that degree of skill and care in the hiring, training and placement of Defendant EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER in the home of EVELYN ZAGAL as required of Presidents and Chief Nurse Executives of home health care services in the same or similar localities. 30. That not withstanding the above mentioned duty, the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER committed one or more of the following acts of negligence: a. Failed to follow company policies and procedures in checking the references of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER; b. Negligently hired EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER; c. Negligently retained EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER; d. Negligently placed EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER in the ZAGAL home; e. Negligently permitted the placement of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in the Zagal home; f. Failed to provide IPI Vent and SCI training; Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 16

g. Failed to provide Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) training; h. Failed to provide training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; i. Failed to provide specific instructions regarding the care of EVELYN ZAGAL; j. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was not so qualified, fit, adequately trained, or competent to render pediatric care to Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL; k. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was unfit for night shift duties as she was employed in a full time day position, had responsibility for the care of her grandchildren and had been found sleeping soundly on the job and used medications decreasing her alertness, therefore increasing the likelihood of her lack of attentiveness, sleeping and lethargy rendering her unqualified or unfit to perform pediatric nursing services exposing Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, to an unreasonable risk of harm. 31. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured, suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering and disability prior to her death. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, TAMARA MULLER in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XV (FIFTEEN) WRONGFUL DEATH -NEGLIGENCE CELESTE CLARK NOW COMES the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL as Special Administrator of the Estate of and complaining of the Defendant CELESTE CLARK states as follows.x 1. At all times relevant hereto, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and next best friend of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, and ALEX O'CAMPO, a minor was a resident of Winnebago County, Illinois. 2. At all times relevant hereto, the Defendant, CELESTE CLARK was a Social Worker employed as a Medical Social Worker and Director of Social Work at INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC., a home care specialist company providing home care services to catastrophic survivor patients. Defendant's place of business is located at 6707 North Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois, Cook County. 3. At all times relevant hereto, the Defendant, CELESTE CLARK was employed as Human Resources Director at INDEPENDENCE PLUS INC., a home care specialist company Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 17

providing home care services to catastrophic survivor patients. Defendant's place of business is located at 6707 North Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois, Cook County. 4. On or about April 12, 2005 INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. contracted with the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL, to provide home care services and nursing care to her daughter, EVELYN ZAGAL. 5. EVELYN ZAGAL, a minor child, had a tracheostomy site on her body through which a trachea cannula was inserted. The tracheostomy and inserted cannula was necessary to maintain the airway of EVELYN ZAGAL. 6. That CELESTE CLARK as Director of Human Resources and Director of Social Work of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., was responsible to review EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER'S job description, and task and duty job directly related to EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER'S placement as an employee providing home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 7. That CELESTE CLARK as Director of Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., was responsible to ensure compliance with all legal obligations of the company. 8. That CELESTE CLARK as Director of Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., had the authority to hire, fire, promote, discipline, any employee of the company. 9. That CELESTE CLARK as Director of Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., was required to help establish, document, update, maintain, communicate and enforce all company policies and procedures. 10. That the job description of CELESTE CLARK as Director of Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC., required her to oversee training and safety programs. 11. That sleeping while on duty was against the policies and procedures of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. 12. That CELESTE CLARKE, as Director of Social Work and Director of Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC, endorsed placement of EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to provide home care services to EVELYN ZAGAL. 13. On and about May 9 and 10, 2006 EVELYN ZAGAL required observation and skilled nursing care to monitor her respiratory status and to maintain the patency of her tracheostomy cannula. 14. EVELYN ZAGAL's home was equipped with monitoring devices and life saving medical equipment ordered by her medical providers. 15. It was the duty of the Defendant, CELESTE CLARK, Director of Social Work and Human Resources of INDEPENDENCE PLUS, INC. to apply the knowledge and use the skill and care ordinarily used by reasonably well-qualified medical social workers and Directors of Human Resources of homecare health companies in the same or similar locale. 16. That notwithstanding said duties, the Defendant CELESTE CLARK was negligent in her roles related to the provision of care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL in one or more of the following respects: a. Failed to follow company policies and procedures in checking the references of EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER; b. Negligently hired EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER to perform services at the ZAGAL home; Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 18

c. Negligently retained EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER; d. Negligently placed EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER in the ZAGAL home; e. Failed to provide or ensure the provision of IPI Vent and SCI training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; f. Failed to provide or ensure the provision of training to EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER; g. Failed to provide specific instructions or ensure the provision of special instructions regarding the care of EVELYN ZAGAL; h. Failed to enforce Company policies and procedures; i. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS-GUNTHER, to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was not so qualified, fit, adequately trained, or competent to render pediatric care to Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL; j. Presented and held out the Defendant, EDNA BRIGGS GUNTHER, (and/or allowed to be presented and held out) to the ZAGAL family as a person who was qualified and fit to perform in home nursing services for Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, when she knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known she was unfit for night shift duties as she was employed in a full time day position, had responsibility for the care of her grandchildren and had been found sleeping soundly on the job, therefore increasing the likelihood of her lack of attentiveness, sleeping and lethargy rendering her unqualified or unfit to perform pediatric nursing services exposing Plaintiffs' decedent, EVELYN ZAGAL, to an unreasonable risk of harm. 17. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts or omissions of CELESTE CLARKE endorsed, permitted and allowed EDNA BRIGGS- GUNTHER to be negligent in the care and treatment of EVELYN ZAGAL and EVELYN ZAGAL suffered severe anoxia and multi-system organ failure and was declared brain dead and died on May 11, 2006 as a result of suffocation and asphyxiation. 18. The acts and omissions of CELESTE CLARK deprived EVELYN ZAGAL of an opportunity to survive or recover from her condition. 19. That EVELYN ZAGAL left surviving her mother and father, TERESA AND CARLOS ZAGAL who have been deprived of their child's love, affection, companionship, friendship, comfort and society and her brother ALEX O'CAMPO a minor who has been deprived of his sister's love, affection, companionship, comfort and society. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, CELESTE CLARK in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XVI (SIXTEEN) FAMILY EXPENSE ACT 750 ILCS 65/15 (a) (1) CELESTE CLARKE Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 19

O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE states as follows. 1.- 18. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 18 of Count XV as paragraphs through 18 of this Count XVI as though fully set forth verbatim herein 19. As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the foregoing acts of negligence of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was caused to incur medical expenses in an effort to be cured of her illness and injury and expended necessary expenses for the decedent's funeral, burial, and related services. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XVII (SEVENTEEN) SURVIVAL ACTION CELESTE CLARKE O'CAMPO, a minor by her attorneys, THE SZYMANSKI KOROLL LITIGATION GROUP, and complaining of the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE, states as follows. 1.-18. Plaintiff realleges and reaffirms paragraphs 1 through 18 of Count XV as paragraphs through 18 of this Count XVII as though fully set forth verbatim herein. 19. That as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the aforesaid negligent acts, EVELYN ZAGAL was injured and died and suffered personal and pecuniary damages, including her pain and suffering as a result of her suffocation and oxygen deprivation and the death of her body organs and disability prior to her death and had she survived she would have been entitled to bring an action for such damages and such action survived her death. 20. That pursuant to 755 ILCS 5/27-6, the Plaintiff, TERESA ZAGAL individually and as Executor of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, has the right to bring this survival action. Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE, in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. COUNT XVIII (EIGHTEEN) RES IPSA LOQUITOR CELESTE CLARKE and complaining of the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE states as follows. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, THERESA ZAGAL individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of EVELYN ZAGAL, Deceased, prays for judgment against the Defendant, CELESTE CLARKE in a sum in excess of $50,000.00 plus costs of suit. Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) 424-5757 20