Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Similar documents
Legislative References. Navajo Partnering Meeting June 18, Flagstaff, Arizona. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016

LPA Programs How They Work

Federal, State, and Local Funding and Assistance Programs. Iowa DOT Office of Local Systems

Understanding the. Program

Funding Programs / Applications A Help Guide on Obtaining Federal and State Funds Breakout Session #3

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year

FHWA SAFETY UPDATE. Michael Griffith Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Highway Safety Improvement Program

Funding Safe Routes to School in California

Nicole Fox, Iowa DOT Office of Local Systems

Robert Limoges, Safety Program Management and Coordination Bureau

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PEER EXCHANGE

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

ATP Technical Advisory Committee Concept Rollout, Stakeholder Comments, Moving Forward

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Availability of Draft Amendment No. 1 to the 2019 FTIP for Interagency Consultation and Public Review

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

South Dakota Department of Transportation. State Planning & Research Program for Local Governments

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance & Application Packet Call for Projects: April 5 th, 2018 May 11 th, 2018

Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Short List WSDOT

Federal Aid 101- How to Spend Federal Dollars. 7 th Annual New Jersey Safety Forum Wednesday, October 19, 2011 Tanya Emam, Local Programs Team Leader

Call in number: Passcode:

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Diagnosis Process. Learning Outcomes. Roadway Safety Management Process Overview MODULE 9. DIAGNOSIS AND COUNTERMEASURE SELECTION

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

Cass County Rural Task Force Call for Projects Deadline: December 12, 2018

Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual

LRSP PROJECT SUCCESSES & CHALLENGES

North Second Street Multimodal Project Design OCTOBER 2017

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

Mississippi Gulf Coast Metropolitan Planning Organization. Transportation Improvement Program FY

Request for Proposals. On-Call General Engineering Services. Public Works Department City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

Section 130 Program Overview and Update. James (Jim) Dahlem FHWA Office of Safety Washington, DC

GAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

ANNUAL REPORT. Pursuant to: Chapters 36 and 152 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly of the Virginia General Assembly

Transforming Transportation Through Innovation

Ohio Department of Transportation. Transportation Funding for LPAs

3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Life-Cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Safety Related Improvements on Roadways

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

A Field Guide. Local Program Opportunities

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Safety Projects and the Local Agency Program (LAP)

April 13, 2007 SUBJECT: GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS OF CITY CONNECTING LINKS OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM - FISCAL YEAR 2011

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

Support by State Departments of Transportation for Local Agency Safety Initiatives

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK

Developing CMFs. Study Types and Potential Biases. Frank Gross VHB

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

Using Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies SHRP2 Case Study

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Major in FY2013/2014 (By and ing Source) Municipal Building Acquisition and Operations Balance $1,984, Contributions from Real Estate

Jackson MPO Transportation Alternatives (TA)

Florida s Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Application

FEDERAL LANDS ACCESS PROGRAM

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

NORTH DAKOTA SIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Request for Statement of Interest (SOI) Traffic Engineering Services On-call Traffic Engineering Assistance

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2018 Budget. Joe Flynn, Secretary of Transportation House Appropriations Committee February 27, 2017

Annual Listing of Projects with Federal Funding for Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD 777 North Capitol Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Section 1201: Requirements for Traveler Information

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

Tribal Safety Champions Workshop Agenda Aloft Hotel Oklahoma City ~ Bricktown November 17-18, 2015

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Guidance for Safety Management at the Local Level

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

NLTAPA Region IV Meeting St. Augustine, FL May 13, 2014

2017 Report for the Transportation Alternatives Program

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

CONTENTS HIGHWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM (HBRRP) 6.1 INTRODUCTION

TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program

AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch

Nevada Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Policy Memorandum Traffic Signal Warrant Approval Process

Memorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)

annual report Dear SHA Customers, Partners, and Employees, Neil J. Pedersen, SHA Administrator

Transcription:

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) For Public Works Officers Institute & Expo March 22, 2017 Richard Ke, P.E. HSIP Manager Division of Local Assistance California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) This presentation covers: Federal Legislation and HSIP Performance Measures; Local HSIP Advisory Committee; Eligible applicants and projects; Funding and project selection; Project delivery requirements and status; and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP).

Federal Legislation The purpose of the HSIP program is to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads (23 U.S. Code 148 (b)(2)) The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST) Signed on 12/4/2015. Includes Performance Measures and Targets HSIP projects: must be based on elements of the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP); Are identified through a data driven process; Target identified safety issue; Reduce fatalities and serious injuries. National Performance Management Measures for the HSIP FHWA Final Rule (released 3/15/2016; effective 4/14/16) Docket Number: FHWA-2013-0020 Five Performance Measures (5-Year Rolling Averages): Number of Fatalities Rate of Fatalities per 100 million VMT Number of Serious Injuries Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT Number of Non-motorized Fatalities and Non-motorized Serious Injuries Target setting: Caltrans will first establish statewide targets by August 31, 2017 HSIP Annual Report for calendar year 2018, and annually thereafter. MPOs will then establish their targets by 1) agreeing to plan and program projects so that they contribute toward the accomplishment of the State targets or 2) committing to a quantifiable HSIP target for the metropolitan planning area.

Local HSIP Advisory Committee Members from: Caltrans; California Transportation Cooperative Committee; California State Association of Counties; League of California Cities; Rural County Task Force; RTPAs; MPOs Provides high level balanced strategic guidance to California s Local HSIP and other safety programs and efforts regarding safety on California local roadways. Meet about 6 times per year. Local HSIP: Eligible Applicants and Projects Eligible applicants: Any local agency that owns, operates, and maintains the public roadways City and County agencies Tribal Governments Others (reviewed on a case by case basis)

Eligible Applicants and Projects Eligible Projects: Generally, any work on publicly owned roadway or bicycle/pedestrian pathway that corrects or improves the safety for users, such as: Safety improvements at intersections (such as providing left turn phase, other signal timing and phasing modifications, improving signal hardware, installing roundabouts, new signals, converting signal to master arm, dilemma zone detection and intersection lighting); Pedestrian/bike projects (such as pedestrian countdown signal heads, sidewalks, pedestrian hybrid beacons, crosswalks, bike lanes, rectangular rapid flashing beacons, etc.); Road diets, roadway safety sign audits, upgrade pavement markings and striping, high friction surface treatments, medians/refuge island installation, new guardrails or guardrail upgrades, etc. Improvement type must have an established Crash Reduction Factor to be included in the Application s Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) calculation; Prefer projects that can be delivered quickly and have minimal ROW and Environmental impacts Local HSIP: Local HSIP apportionments: approx. $81 million per year (2016 2010 average) National California California Local HSIP $2.317 billion/year $204 million/year $81 million/year Calls for Projects: Interval: every one to two years (8 calls from 2007); Most recent call (Cycle 8): May, 2016; Next call (Cycle 9): expected to be around May, 2018.

Key to Successful Applications: 1. Develop good projects: Select locations where safety improvements are most needed (high crash-concentration spots versus systemic approach). Apply effective safety countermeasures. 2. Prepare your applications no fatal flaws. A technical process not grant writing engineer s work. Collect/verify data; Use data correctly. Local HSIP: Cycle 8 Call for Projects (2016): Min: $100k per application; Max: $10 million per agency. Three Categories: 1. Benefit/Cost Ratio (BCR) projects 2. Set aside for guardrail upgrades: for upgrades of existing guardrails and end treatments 3. Set aside for crosswalk enhancements and pedestrian countdown heads

Cycle 8 Call for Projects (2016): Benefit/Cost Ratio Calculation Procedure Local HSIP: Cycle 8 Call for Projects (2016): Application s minimum BCR: 3.5 Countermeasures have different federal eligibility % s: CM Type 100% 90% 50% Total Signalized Intersection (S) 13 4 1 18 Non Signalized Intersection (NS) 12 8 0 20 Roadway (R) 15 23 0 38 Total 40 35 1 76

Cycle 8 Call for Projects (2016): Federal Funds ($M) Applications Selected Projects 247 225 91% $252 $216.9 88% % Selected Selected Projects: Benefit/Cost Ratio: 167 projects / $187.6m of HSIP funds: Average BCR 12.4; Guardrail upgrade set aside: 24 projects / $21.9m HSIP funds; Crosswalk enhancements/pedestrian countdown heads set aside: 34 projects / $7.4m HSIP funds; Local HSIP: Cycles 4-8 - Project Selection Cycle Release Date Number of Applications Number of projects selected Federal funds approved ($M) Average BCR of selected projects 4 2/23/2011 357 179 $74.5 7.9 5 10/19/2012 276 221 $111.3 14.6 6 11/14/2013 389 231 $150.0 10.7 7 11/12/2015 212 182 $160.5 16.9 8 11/21/2016 247 225 $216.9 12.4 Total 1,481 1,038 $713.2 12.9 Expected benefits: $9.2 billion!

Project Delivery Requirements Need to follow federal aid process; Requirements established to ensure safety projects are delivered in a timely manner PE Authorization within 9 months; and CON Authorization within 36 months Can not apply for new HSIP funds if either milestone is not met If there is still no CON authorization within 5 years, project will be removed from the program. Local HSIP Project Delivery Status Status of Local HSIP Projects (as of 1/3/2017) Status Number of Projects (all 8 cycles) % Number of Projects (cycles 1 to 5) No Authorization In Preliminary Engineering / Right of Way 318 23% 8 242 17% 30 In Construction 377 27% 277 Completed 473 34% 464 Total 1410 100% 779

Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) $10 million of state funds allocated by the CTC in October, 2015. Provides funding to do a comprehensive systemic safety analysis on roadway networks. Purpose is to assist local agencies that do not have safety analysis expertise. Up to $250,000 for one agency; up to $500,000 for a joint application (two or more agencies). Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) Selection results announced on 7/15/16 61 projects; $10m state funds 41 are cities / 15 are counties / 5 joint. As of 3/1/17: $7.2 million sub-allocated to 41 projects. 46 applications unselected (requesting $7.7m of state funds) CTC allocated $7.7m in its January, 2017 meeting

Questions? Thank you Local HSIP Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/localprograms/hsip.html Or Google search: Local HSIP