Call in number: Passcode:
|
|
- Jessica Horton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Welcome! Call in number: Passcode:
2 Welcome Housekeeping SafetyAnalyst Update Today s Agenda HSIP Final Rule Presentation Discussion on HSIP Reporting Requirements Polling Questions and Q&A
3
4 Final Rule Issued in Federal Register on December 24, 2008 Website Link: Rule took affect January 23, 2009
5 Why did FHWA change the regulation? 23 CFR Part 924 written long ago August 2005: SAFETEA-LU established new core HSIP structure t and funding to make significant progress in reducing highway fatalities Program statutory requirements established in 23 USC 148 Final Rule incorporates new statutory t t requirements
6 Section titles remain unchanged: Purpose Definitions Policy Program Structure Planning Implementation Evaluation Reporting
7 So, what s new?
8 Section Purpose Evaluation explicitly added to list of comprehensive HSIP components
9 Section Definitions Added 17 definitions 23 USC 148(a) definitions used as basis Clarifies terms used in text of proposed regulations
10 Section Policy Paragraph (a) Added: evaluate the program on an annual basis Clarified program s objective: significantly reducing the occurrence of and the potential for fatalities and serious injuries resulting from crashes on all public roads.
11 Section Policy Paragraph (b) NEW Emphasizes that States shall first consider whether the activity maximizes opportunities to advance safety Requires States to fund safety projects that are most likely to reduce the number of, or potential for, fatalities and serious injuries
12 Section Policy Paragraph (c) NEW Highlights that other Federal-aid funds are eligible to support and leverage the safety program Suggests that safety improvements as part of broader projects should use the same funding source as the broader project Recommends other funding sources
13 Section Policy Paragraph (d) NEW Reiterates that traffic control devices that are installed using HSIP funding must be compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
14 Section Program Structure Paragraph (a) NEW Requires HSIP to include data-driven SHSP HSIP to include high-risk rural roads and railway-highway grade crossings
15 Section Program Structure Paragraph (b) g p ( ) Requires that each State s HSIP include processes for evaluating the HSIP and the SHSP Processes shall be developed in consultation with the FHWA Division Administrator
16 924.9 Planning Overall Changes Provides more information regarding HSIP planning process Reorganizes section Adds more detail regarding individual elements of the planning process Places emphasis on data and data systems Places emphasis on data and data systems improvement
17 Section Planning Paragraph (a) Five Planning Process Elements: 1) Collect and maintain safety records and data 2) Advance capabilities for safety data collection and analysis NEW 3) Analyze available safety data 4) Conduct engineering studies and develop highway safety improvement projects 5) Establish priorities and implementation schedules for improvement projects
18 Section Planning Paragraph (a) 1) Collect and maintain safety records and data on all public roads Encourages States to make databases more comprehensive: Crash Roadway Traffic Vehicle NEW
19 Section Planning Paragraph (a) 2) Advance capabilities for safety data collection and analysis NEW Emphasizes: Timeliness Accuracy Completeness Uniformity Integration Accessibility of safety data or traffic records
20 Section Planning Paragraph (a) 3) Analyze available safety data Provides detailed information for developing data-driven program: Projects and priorities based on crash data, severity, other safety information, and evaluation process Data-driven SHSP includes stakeholders and identifies key emphasis areas, performance-based goals, priorities, and approved by Governor High-Risk Rural Roads program applies to Stateand non-state-owned roads Railway-Highway Grade Crossing Program
21 Section Planning Paragraph (a) 4) Conduct engineering studies Adds roadway safety audits and other safety assessments and reviews as types of studies to be used
22 Section Planning Paragraph (a) 5) Establish priorities for implementing highway safety improvement projects Elements of process: Potential reduction in number of fatalities and serious injuries Cost effectiveness of projects and available resources SHSP priorities NEW Correct and prevent hazardous conditions NEW Other safety data-driven criteria Integrate with statewide transportation processes and programs NEW
23 Section Planning Paragraph (b) Finance Planning Process with funds made available through: 23 USC USC USC USC USC USC 104(f) where applicable in Metropolitan Planning Areas
24 Section Planning Paragraph (c) NEW Links highway safety improvement projects with Statewide and Metropolitan Transportation Planning Processes
25 Section Implementation Overall Changes Expanded to provide more detailed explanation regarding implementation requirements
26 Section Implementation Paragraph (a) Simplified language to tie implementation to planning Editorial change: reference to 23 CFR Part 630 relocated as new Paragraph (i)
27 Section Implementation Previous Regulation Paragraph (b) Deleted this paragraph (Hazard Elimination Program) Program repealed by SAFETEA-LU Funds now apportioned under 23 USC 104(b)(5)
28 Section Implementation Paragraph (b) NEW Allows up to 10% of amount apportioned under 23 USC 104(b)(5) for a fiscal year to be used for safety projects under any other section of Title 23 USC if the State has met infrastructure safety needs relating to: Railway-highway grade crossings Highway safety improvement projects Establishes approval process
29 Section Implementation Paragraph (c) NEW Funding set asides from 23 USC 104(b)(5) for construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads
30 Section Implementation Paragraph (d) Clarifies requirements for use of funds set aside pursuant to 23 USC 130(e) for railway-highway grade crossings: 50% of 23 USC 130(f) funds must be made available for installation of highway- railway grade crossing protective devices 23 USC 130(k): Use no more than 2% of these funds for compilation and analysis of safety data in support of Section (a)(2) annual report requirement
31 Section Implementation Paragraph (e) No significant changes formerly Paragraph (d)
32 Section Implementation Previous Regulation Paragraph (e) Deleted this paragraph 23 USC 219 Safer Off-System Roads repealed in 1987
33 Section Implementation Previous Regulation Paragraph (f) Deleted this paragraph 23 CFR part 650, subpart D (Special Bridge Replacement Program): Very specific activity address only in part 650, not HSIP
34 Section Implementation Paragraph (f) Adds that awards for highway safety improvement projects shall be in accordance with: 23 CFR Part 172 engineering and design 49 CFR Part 18 nonhighway construction projects
35 Section Implementation Paragraph (g) NEW Safety projects funded under 23 USC 104(b)(5) shall be accounted for in the statewide transportation improvement program and reported on annually
36 Section Implementation Paragraph (h) NEW Safety projects under 23 USC 104(b)(5): Federal share = 90% max For States with a large percentage of Federal Lands: Federal share = 95% max (sliding scale) Some types of projects: Federal share = up to 100% No more than 10% of the sums apportioned under 23 USC 104 shall be at this rate Some railway-highway grade crossing projects: Federal Share = up to 100% Subject to 10% limit for funds apportioned under 23 USC 104
37 Section Evaluation Overall Changes Revised to clearly describe: Evaluation process Information to be used Mechanisms to be used for financing evaluations
38 Section Evaluation Paragraph (a) Requires States to evaluate: Overall HSIP Results achieved in reducing number of crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries or potential crashes Reaching performance goals identified in the planning process SHSP Evaluate on a regular basis to: Ensure the accuracy and currency of safety data Identify factors affecting priorities, strategies, and improvements Identify issues demonstrating ti need to update SHSP
39 Section Evaluation Paragraph (b) Expanded to require information from evaluation process be used for: Setting priorities for highway safety improvement projects Assessing overall effectiveness of HSIP Reporting required in Section
40 Evaluation Paragraph (c) No significant changes
41 Section Reporting Overall Changes Expands to specify requirements for States to submit annual reports
42 Section Reporting Paragraph (a) Reports to be submitted: Report describing progress in implementing State HSIP Report describing progress in implementing railway-highway grade crossing improvements Transparency report
43 Section Reporting Paragraph (a) Report describing progress to implement State HSIP: Progress in implementing projects Assess effectiveness of improvements effectiveness of HSIP highway safety trends (number and rate) extent to which improvements contributed to performance goals Describe High-Risk Rural Roads program
44 Section Reporting Paragraph (a) Report describing progress to implement railway-highway y grade crossing improvements: in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 130(g) effectiveness of improvements
45 Section Reporting Paragraph (a) Transparency Report Describes not less than 5% of a State s highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs that: Identifies potential remedies, costs and impediments to implementing those remedies Emphasizes fatality and serious injury data Uses current data (3 to 5 years) Identifies data years and extent of coverage Identifies methodology used to determine locations Is compatible with the requirements of 29 USC 794(d), Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
46 Reporting Paragraph (b) No significant changes
47 HSIP Reporting Guidance Discussion Issues/Concerns with Existing Guidance Additional Guidance Needed? Project Categories
48 What should I do now? Download and become familiar with the new rule New rule took affect January 23, 2009 Obtain new rule at: Update your HSIP processes, where needed, to comply with the new rule and ask questions if you have them Submit required reports to FHWA Division Administrator by August 31, 2009: HSIP progress report Highway-railway grade crossing improvements report Transparency report
49 Contact tinformation Erin Kenley (202)
GAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate November 2008 HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Further Efforts
More informationAPPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK
APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK General Approach The Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization (YMPO) encourages Proposers to be creative in developing a sound approach which achieves the goals for this project.
More informationLegislative References. Navajo Partnering Meeting June 18, Flagstaff, Arizona. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Navajo Partnership Meeting Purpose of the HSIP To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non
More informationSection 130 Program Overview and Update. James (Jim) Dahlem FHWA Office of Safety Washington, DC
Section 130 Program Overview and Update James (Jim) Dahlem FHWA Office of Safety Washington, DC Agenda Overview of Section 130 5 minutes Latest Updates on Section 130 15 minutes FY 2014 Funding Apportionments
More information49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION SUBTITLE VI - MOTOR VEHICLE AND DRIVER PROGRAMS PART B - COMMERCIAL CHAPTER 311 - COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL AUTHORITY AND STATE GRANTS 31100. Purpose
More informationRULES CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Transportation Development RULES CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 2 CCR 601-19 [Editor s Notes follow the text of the rules at
More informationIncentive Grants for the States Webinar
MAP-21 and Traffic Safety: Incentive Grants for the States Webinar April 3, 2013 Dial 888-437-3195 for the webinar audio Speakers Mary D. Gunnels, PhD, MS NHTSA Associate Administrator Regional Operations
More informationOverview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) For Public Works Officers Institute & Expo March 22, 2017 Richard Ke, P.E. HSIP Manager Division of Local Assistance California Department of
More information9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS
9. REVENUE SOURCES This Chapter summarizes multimodal revenue sources and estimates that are applicable to the City of Coolidge and the Town of Florence, together with financial constraints and opportunities
More informationMAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements
Date: July 13, 2012 Subject: MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements The recently enacted Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) includes a number of substantial changes
More informationIllinois Grant Accountability and Transparency Act Programmatic Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Illinois Grant Accountability and Transparency Act Programmatic Risk Assessment Questionnaire In response to the requirements of 2 CFR 200.205, the awarding agency is required to review the programmatic
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016
Regional Transportation Commission TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016 Contents 1.0 Purpose and Eligibility... 2 2.0 Process... 5 3.0 Implementation of Funded Projects... 5 Attachment
More informationHighway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual
Highway Safety Improvement Program Procedures Manual February 2017 Division of Planning Office of Systems Planning and Program Management Contents Section Page Preface... iii HSIP Program Procedure...
More informationModule 2 Planning and Programming
Module 2 Planning and Programming Contents: Section 1 Overview... 2-2 Section 2 Coordination with MPO... 2-4 Section 3 Functional Classification... 2-6 Section 4 Minute Order for Designation as Access
More informationUsing Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies SHRP2 Case Study
Using Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies Leveraging Section 130 Funding through Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) Improving Railroad Crossing Safety Using Section 130 Funds and SHRP2 Strategies
More informationFY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program
1 FY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program Summary This notice announces the availability of funding for the Value Pricing Pilot Program (VPPP). In addition this notice identifies
More informationNorthern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1
Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1 State Fiscal Year 2017 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017 I. Work Program Purpose Each year the Arizona Department of Transportation Multimodal
More informationIRR Program, Inventory and Funding Formula Update
IRR Program, Inventory and Funding Formula Update TRIBAL TRANSPORTATION AT A CROSSROAD: TRIBAL LEADERS FORUM ON THE CURRENT STATE OF TRIBAL TRANSPORTATION National Congress of American Indians Palm Springs,
More informationLPA Programs How They Work
LPA Programs How They Work Ann Wills, P.E. Transportation Engineering Conference 2018 www.dotd.la.gov Requirements For ALL LPA Projects 1. Risk Assessment 2. Entity-State Agreement 3. Responsible Charge
More informationTRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions
TRANSPORTATION STATEMENT OF BASIC PHILOSOPHY The National Association of Counties (NACo) believes that the nation s transportation system is a vital component in building and sustaining communities, moving
More informationSection 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight
Section 8 Certification and Federal-Aid Project Oversight Certification MoDOT certifies that the transportation planning process is being carried out in accordance with the following requirements in 23
More informationMoving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) ATP 6 Discussion June 28, 2013 Minnesota Overview: MAP-21 vs. SAFETEA-LU Overall apportionment consistent
More informationDeveloping the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program
Transportation Decisionmaking Information Tools For Tribal Governments Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 4 What is the TTIP?
More informationAppendix 5 Freight Funding Programs
5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program
More informationHighway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Fiscal Year 2008-09 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HISP) 23 USC Section 148 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Program (BPSP) Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety
More informationThe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 http://www.dot.gov/recovery/ Enacted February 17, 2009 A Rose by any other name The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Was commonly referred
More informationSMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.
SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently
More informationMemorandum. Date: May 13, INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act)
Memorandum Subject: INFORMATION: Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside Implementation Guidance (Revised by the FAST Act) Date: May 13, 2016 / Original signed by / From: Gloria M. Shepherd Associate
More informationLocal Control Funding Formula Spending Regulations Comparison and Feedback Response Chart
Page 1 of 11 Local Control Funding Formula Spending Comparison and Response Chart Overview At the November 6-7, 2013, State Board of Education (SBE) meeting, Agenda Item 13 presented a preliminary draft
More informationFederal Aid 101- How to Spend Federal Dollars. 7 th Annual New Jersey Safety Forum Wednesday, October 19, 2011 Tanya Emam, Local Programs Team Leader
Federal Aid 101- How to Spend Federal Dollars 7 th Annual New Jersey Safety Forum Wednesday, October 19, 2011 Tanya Emam, Local Programs Team Leader Federal-aid Highway Program (FAHP) Established by Title
More information9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs
9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9.1. Grant Funding Overview Grant funding continues to be a key factor for ports in meeting capital investment requirements. Grants can
More informationTxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program
TxDOT Funding and Accelerated Construction Program RANDY C. HOPMANN, P.E. DIRECTOR OF DISTRICT OPERATIONS TXAPA s 42nd Annual Meeting September 22, 2016 Highway Transportation in Texas: Today and Our Future
More informationSAMPLE. Programmatic Risk Assessment Questionnaire. Program Agency:
Programmatic Risk Assessment Questionnaire Program Agency: The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the programmatic risk of applicants for grant funding through the Illinois Criminal Justice Information
More informationDCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015
DCHC MPO ing Overview & Guidance draft January 2015 General Ratio APD Bond R CMAQ DP SHRP Appalachian Development Highway Revenue Bond Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Demonstration, Priority, and
More informationPUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN 10263 The Kankakee County Planning Department, acting as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Kankakee, Illinois Urbanized Area and through the Policy Committee
More informationMOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY
MOVE LV Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY Services PLANNING DATA + ANALYSIS EDUCATION PROJECTS + LAWS FUNDING Federal Government State Government Regional
More informationPurpose. Funding. Eligible Projects
SMART SCALE is a statewide program that distributes funding based on a transparent and objective evaluation of projects that will determine how effectively they help the state achieve its transportation
More informationSAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background
SAFETEA-LU This document provides information related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) that was previously posted on the Center for
More informationSTATE DOT ADMINISTRATION
STATE DOT ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ROAD SAFETY AID Prepared for: NCHRP Project 20-24, Task 87 National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies Prepared
More informationSummary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014
H.R. 4348, THE MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY ACT CONFERENCE REPORT Summary of Key Highway and Research Provisions The following summary is intended to highlight thee highway and research
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/16/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-05354, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-22-P]
More informationPlease complete your phone connection now:
Today s seminar will begin shortly. Please complete your phone connection now: 1. Dial the toll free number: 1-866-275-3495. 2. Enter the meeting number *4671867* on your phone keypad. Enter the star (*)
More informationIowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.
Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E. Hilton Garden Inn September 29, 2016 Member of the Day Personal Updates M.J. Charlie Purcell Promoted to Project Delivery Bureau Director
More informationThe NDOT Subrecipient Risk Assessment Questionnaire FFY19
The NDOT Subrecipient Risk Assessment Questionnaire FFY19 The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the technical and financial risk of the Section 5310, 5311, 5311(f), and 5339 applicants. Limited
More informationTRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) PROGRAM WORKSHOP. Call for Projects 2017 and 2018
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) PROGRAM WORKSHOP Call for Projects 2017 and 2018 WELCOME! Casual atmosphere Please silence your phones Restrooms: turn right when you leave this room and they will be around
More informationBrownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?
Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, 2012 What is FHWA? 2 1 What does FHWA do? The Federal Highway Administration: Improves Mobility on the Nation s highways through National Leadership, Innovation
More informationTitle VI: Public Participation Plan
Whatcom Council of Governments Public Participation Plan Adopted October 14, 2009 Updated November 12, 2014 Whatcom Council of Governments 314 East Champion Street Bellingham, WA 98225 (360) 676 6974 Whatcom
More information2018 Call for Projects Guidebook
2018 Call for Projects Guidebook Project Selection for the NFRMPO CMAQ, STBG, and TA Programs in FY2022 and FY2023 October 8, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Section 1 - Call Overview... 2 1.1
More informationNon-Motorized Transportation Funding Options
Non-Motorized Transportation Funding Options Bicycle and pedestrian projects are broadly eligible for funding from nearly all major federal highway, transit, safety, and other programs. To be eligible
More informationSupport by State Departments of Transportation for Local Agency Safety Initiatives
Support by State Departments of Transportation for Local Agency Safety Initiatives Final Report July 2009 Sponsored by the Iowa Highway Research Board and the Iowa Department of Transportation About the
More information6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues valuation County Transportation Excise Tax
6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction This chapter discusses local, state and federal highway funding sources. Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues Once the Board of Supervisors has established a roadway,
More informationOVERALL WORK PROGRAM. Process and Procedures
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM Process and Procedures As Recommended for Approval by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 11, 2015 Approved by the OahuMPO Policy Board on September XX, 2015 Prepared by
More informationANNUAL REPORT. Pursuant to: Chapters 36 and 152 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly of the Virginia General Assembly
ANNUAL REPORT Pursuant to: Chapters 36 and 152 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly of the Virginia General Assembly Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 November
More information49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 49 - TRANSPORTATION SUBTITLE VI - MOTOR VEHICLE AND DRIVER PROGRAMS PART B - COMMERCIAL CHAPTER 311 - COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL AUTHORITY AND STATE GRANTS 31102. Grants
More information2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS
2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Background... 3 A. Policy Framework... 3 B. Development of the 2019-2022 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)..
More informationPublic Participation Plan
Lowcountry Area Transportation Study (LATS) Metropolitan Planning Organization Approved January 24, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction and Background... 1 Purpose... 1 LATS Organization... 4 Public Participation
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/26/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-25894, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-22-P]
More informationTexas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 19 Public Transportation. (a) Purpose. Title 49 U.S.C. 5329, authorizes the
Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 SUBCHAPTER D. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.. Public Transit Safety Program. (a) Purpose. Title U.S.C., authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. DOT to create and implement
More informationBehavior. Programs. Safety. December Research. lives, guidance, unsafe behaviors. However, problem. administration.
Behavior al Traffic Safety Cooperative Research Program FY2018 December 2017 Announcement of Research Projects A forum for coordinated and collaborative research, the Behavioral Traffic Safety Cooperative
More informationThe FAST Act: New Department of Transportation Tribal Self-Governance Program and Tribal Transportation Provisions
The FAST Act: New Department of Transportation Tribal Self-Governance Program and Tribal Transportation Provisions Self-Governance Communication and Education (SGCE) Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker, LLP January
More informationPlaying by the Rules
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Office of Community Planning and Development Community Development Block Grant Program Playing by the Rules A Handbook for CDBG Subrecipients on Administrative
More informationDELAWARE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY (DSHA) FY18 DELAWARE CDBG APPLICATION FORM. A. Name, address, phone number, DUNS number, and EIN number of Applicant:
I. General Application Information DELAWARE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY (DSHA) FY18 DELAWARE CDBG APPLICATION FORM A. Name, address, phone number, DUNS number, and EIN number of Applicant: B. Name, position
More informationFormal STIP Amendment
FHWA/FTA AND MNDOT GUIDANCE FOR FORMAL STIP AMENDMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STIP MODIFICATIONS Effective: April 15, 2015 The STIP may be updated periodically throughout the course of the year for project
More informationTxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers
TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers Below are some common questions received in TxDOT s 2017 TA Set-Aside Call for Projects. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Texas Administration
More informationNavigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects
Navigating MAP 21 Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects Presenters Dave Tyahla NRPA Christopher Douwes Federal Highway Administration Margo Pedroso Safe Routes to School National
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY. General Management and Development Program Rules HFA 101
NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY General Management and Development Program Rules HFA 101 Table of Contents HFA 101 PART ONE: Overview, Purpose, Applicability 101.01 Overview and Purpose 101.02
More informationYouth Homelessness Demonstration Program Frequently Asked Questions
Youth Homelessness Demonstration Program Frequently Asked Questions These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) provide applicants with general information about the Youth Homelessness Demonstration Program
More informationFederal Policies Toward State Emergency Medical Services
I Chapter 6 Federal Policies Toward State Emergency Medical Services States use many different sources to fund their emergency medical services (EMS) activities and EMS resources vary dramatically by State.
More informationAppendix B. FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria
Appendix B Connecticut DOT: LOCHSTP Process Steps and Timeline FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria Coordinated Planning Process Interim Guidance
More information3. Update on the North Winchester Area Plan John Madera, NSVRC & Terry Short, VDOT
Winchester-Frederick County MPO Policy Board Meeting Agenda Frederick County Administrative Offices - First Floor Conference Room 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, VA September 19, 2018-10:00 a.m. 1. ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationMAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions
MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions This paper provides an overview of the project delivery provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). It also briefly summarizes
More informationGuidance for Safety Management at the Local Level
Guidance for Safety Management at the Local Level NCHRP Project 17-18(15) January 2016 Submitted by: CH2M Traffic Safety Solutions, LLC Contents Section Page Acknowledgements... iii Acronyms... v I. Summary...
More informationt J{li Northwestern Indiana
Lake, Porter, and La Porte Counties, Indiana for State Fiscal Years 2018-2021 May 18, 2017 List Version DF6 t J{li Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission 6100 Southport Road (219) 763-6060 Portage,
More informationBasis of Payment and Appeal Procedure; Out-of-State Hospital Services. Authorized By: Jennifer Velez, Commissioner, Department of Human Services.
HUMAN SERVICES 45 NJR 2(2) February 19, 2013 Filed January 17, 2013 DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES Hospital Services Manual Basis of Payment and Appeal Procedure; Out-of-State Hospital
More informationAppendix E: Grant Funding Sources
Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources Federal Programs The majority of public funds for bicycle, pedestrian, and trails projects are derived through a core group of federal and state programs. Federal funding
More informationBOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Fiscal Year 2016 Unified Planning Work Program Approved by Policy Committee - April 13, 2015 Prepared by Bowling Green-Warren County Metropolitan
More informationKYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Sub-allocated Funding Process and Application Package This packet includes information and guidance about the process used by KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission to
More informationState of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Program Announcement, Call for Projects, and NDOT Guidance for Potential Applications for 2019-2020 Funding www.nevadadot.com/tap
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Guidance
Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) partners with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area
FFY 2015-2016 Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area A Grant Program of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) U.S. Department of Transportation
More informationGuidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014
1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program
More informationFEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM AND NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM Competitive Grant Application for the Tampa Bay Metropolitan Area, including the urbanized areas of Pasco, Pinellas,
More informationTransportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP) www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/transportation_alternatives/overview/presentation/ 1 Transportation Alternatives Program Authorized
More informationU. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 49 U.S.C.
APRIL 2011 20.516 JOB ACCESS REVERSE COMMUTE State Project/Program: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM (JARC) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Authorization: Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
More informationFederal Financing of Transportation in Texas
Federal Financing of Transportation in Texas LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF MARCH 2012 FEDERAL FINANCING OF TRANSPORTATION IN TEXAS SUBMITTED TO THE 82 ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE MARCH 2012 PREPARED BY LEGISLATIVE
More informationAPPENDIX 5. Funding Plan
STUDY: FINAL REPORT APPENDIX 5 Funding Plan May 2015 V:\2073\active\2073009060\report\DRAFT Final Report\rpt_MalPCH_DRAFTFinalReport-20150515.docx Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study: Funding Plan City
More informationFY 2018 Work Program
Southeast Alabama Rural Planning Organization (RPO) FY 2018 Work Program Prepared for the RPO by the Southeast Alabama Regional Planning & Development Commission September 2017 WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR
More informationMERCATUS ON POLICY. How to Fix Roads and Bridges without Increasing the Fuel Tax: Reform Federal Highway Policy and Use the Savings for Roads
MERCATUS ON POLICY How to Fix Roads and Bridges without Increasing the Fuel Tax: Reform Federal Highway Policy and Use the Savings for Roads Tracy Miller and Megan Hansen July 2015 A s gas prices have
More information(Billing Code ) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Costs. Related to Counterfeit Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D010)
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/30/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-20475, and on FDsys.gov (Billing Code 5001-06) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationSection 1201: Requirements for Traveler Information
NATMEC Improving Traffic Data Collection, Analysis, and Use June 21-24, 24, 2010 Seattle, Washington Section 1201: Requirements for Traveler Information Presented by: Walter T. During, PE Transportation
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Town of Hope Mills Multi-Modal Congestion Management Plan September 19, 2016 Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Proposal Due Date: 3:00 PM Eastern Time, 28 th October,
More informationUnderstanding the. Program
Understanding the Transportation Improvement Program Aka: TIP 101 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Federally Mandated for all MPO s by USDOT Short Range (no more than four years) All federally
More informationRequest for Applications to Participate In Demonstration Projects to Evaluate Direct Certification with Medicaid
ATTACHMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program Request for Applications to Participate In Demonstration Projects to Evaluate
More informationAMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21
AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21 SAFETEA LU PROGRAMS 2012 MAP-21 PROGRAMS ANALYSIS 3 Distinct programs with their own funding, and mechanics
More informationA Field Guide. Local Program Opportunities
A Field Guide Local Opportunities Local Opportunities Fact Sheets: 1 Surface Transportation (STP) 2 Highway Safety Improvement (HSIP) 3 High Risk Rural Roads (HRRR) 4 Railway-Highway Grade Crossing 5 Congestion
More informationUSDA Farm to School Grant Program: Conference/Event Grants
USDA Farm to School Grant Program: Conference/Event Grants March 14, 2014 For audio, dial 888-989-7679, passcode: 3915580. Today s Presenters Matt Russell, Grant Manager, Farm to School Program Gregg Walton,
More informationTrails and Recreational Access for Alaska (TRAAK) Project Nomination Package
Trails and Recreational Access for Alaska (TRAAK) Project Nomination Package Project Title: Jensen- Olson Arboretum Trailhead Parking and S.E. Alaska Botanical Center A project qualifies under TRAAK if
More informationSMART SCALE Policy Guide
What is SMART SCALE? Virginia s SMART SCALE ( 33.2 21.4) is about picking the right transportation projects for funding and ensuring the best use of limited tax dollars. It is the method of scoring planned
More informationQuestions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009
Questions & Answers Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009 All Programs: 1. June 2007 Q. Do applicants have to list
More informationDRAFT Subject to Modifications
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M DRAFT Subject to Modifications To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5I From: Date: Subject: Staff June 15, 2012 Council Meeting Local Government
More information