IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv WMS Document 8 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :08:22 AM

RECRUITING HANDOUT FOR THE COLLEGE BOUND STUDENT-ATHLETE

Plaintiff, Bernard Woodruff ("Woodruff), by the undersigned attorneys, makes the

Case 4:10-cv Document 33 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 8:09-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (GREENBELT DIVISION)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

FINANCIAL AID POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

NCAA Compliance: A Guide for Parents

1 p.m. (Central time) NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions University of Iowa UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO.

Guide for. Four-Year Transfers. For student-athletes at four-year colleges FOUR-YEAR TRANSFER GUIDE 1

[THIS REPORT REFLECTS CHANGES MADE TO PENALTY C-9 BY THE COMMITTEE ON MARCH 15, 2013.] OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT February 7, 2013

Index No. Petitioner, : -against- : VERIFIED PETITION. Petitioner Scott McConnell, by his counsel undersigned, alleges as follows:

EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4:11-cv RBH Date Filed 05/27/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION COMPLAINT

Title IX Athletics Q & A

EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES (LEGAL)

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION AUGUST 21, 2014

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Starbucks College Achievement Plan Program Document

Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

NCAA DIVISION I: NEW LEGISLATION 2013 NCAA REGIONAL RULES SEMINAR

9/21/2017 4:16:26 PM 17CV41502 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

to South Dakota law for breach of contract damages against the above-named Defendant. NATURE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION

Recruiting Guidelines For Collegiate Athletics

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

College Sports Recruiting 101. Presented by Julian Jenkins

2 A student-athlete may miss class in order to attend an entertainment activity in conjunction with a practice. A) True. B) False.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION COMPLAINT

ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES AND INTERPRETATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL LETTER OF INTENT (SIGNED DURING THE SIGNING PERIODS)

U.S v. City of Indianapolis

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY

U SPORTS LETTER OF INTENT (LOI)

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION

REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION DIVISION I INFRACTIONS APPEALS COMMITTEE. April 22, Report No. 372

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D01-501

JURISDICTION. 4. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f), 42 U.S.C. THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 04/03/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:10-cv AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

March Rules. Education. Georgia State University Department of Athletics. Olympic Sports March 26 th, 2015

1 It is permissible to make a phone call to a prospective student-athlete during a dead period. A) True. B) False.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF HENRICO

Coaches Code of Conduct

Possession is 9/10 th of the law. Once a resident has been admitted, it is very difficult under current regulations to effect a transfer.

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv ADS-WDW Document 22 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 173

College Recruitment and the Berkeley Carroll Student-Athlete

Southern Scorpions District School Sport

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION December 21, 2016

Policies and Procedures Recruiting Regulations

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION DECEMBER 20, 2017

SJSU Athletics Compliance Office Coaches Education

SECTION 8: TEAM MANAGEMENT

Summary of NCAA Regulations NCAA Division II

Sandra V Heinsz, Ph.D. Informed Consent Services Agreement

Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights

Case 3:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 30

UNOFFICIAL VISITATION FORM COMPLIMENTARY ADMISSIONS

Practice Exam. 6 A Division II institution may make a four-year athletics scholarship offer to a prospective student-athlete. A) True. B) False.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RISK MANAGEMENT AND MALPRACTICE

NCAA IMPOSES PENALTIES IN TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS CASE

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION November 14, 2017

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. the Estate of NOLAN MICHAEL BURCH, Deceased, by their attorneys, Brewer &

Shoreline Community College Athletic Department Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA)

Chico State Intelligent Systems Lab Summer Robotics Camp General Information

NCAA Division II Essential Rules Reference Guide

MEMORANDUM OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE PEACE CORPS AND NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY

Practice Exam. 3 An institution may make a donation to a local sports club to cover a coach's actual and necessary expenses. A) True. B) False.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Intercollegiate Athletics Information Program Thursday, November 13, 2014 Catonsville HS. Information for your prospective student-athletes (PSA)

PLAYING THE GAME. Inside Athletic Recruiting in the Ivy League. Foreword by Jay Fiedler. Chris Lincoln

Sunday, January 18, 2015

SDSU ATHLETICS COMPLIANCE Commitment to Compliance: Women s Rowing or Swimming & Diving Graduate Assistant Coach

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT SERVICES AGREEMENT COLORADO

Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiffs Wesley Thornton and Antoinette Stansberry bring this Class Action Complaint

CONTACT: David Swank, Chair, NCAA Committee on Infractions VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS REPORT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PIACED ON PROBATION

Case 1:08-cv TWT Document 1 Filed 09/18/08 Page 1 of 27

NCAA RULES EDUCATION CAMPS. All Coaches January 30 th, 2013

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TARA BRADY, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action : v. : No. : SACRED HEART : UNIVERSITY and EDWARD : SWANSON, : : Defendants. : COMPLAINT Plaintiff, by her undersigned attorneys, brings this Complaint against Defendants and in support states the following: INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff Tara Brady, a former Sacred Heart University (Sacred Heart) student who was a starting center on the women s basketball team, brings this action to challenge her involuntary dismissal from the team and forced withdrawal from the school based solely on her pregnancy. Sacred Heart s actions constitute sex discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681. Tara Brady also brings state common law claims of breach of contract against Sacred Heart and tortious interference with contractual or beneficial relations and negligent infliction of emotional distress against her former coach, Edward Swanson, arising out of the same incident. JURISDICTION 1

2. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by: (a) 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343(a)(4), as this is a civil action to redress the deprivation of civil rights secured by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681(a); and (b) 28 U.S.C. 1367, as this action includes state law claims that arise out of the same nucleus of operative facts as the federal claim. PARTIES AND VENUE 3. Plaintiff Tara Brady is a female citizen of the United States who resides in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. 4. Defendant Sacred Heart University is a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I educational institution that receives federal financial assistance and has its main campus in Fairfield, Connecticut. 5. Defendant Edward Swanson is a citizen of the United States who resides in Derby, Connecticut. 6. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). FACTS 7. In the fall of 1999, Tara Brady enrolled at Sacred Heart, choosing that school over several others because she understood that Sacred Heart would give her the opportunity to have significantly more playing time on its basketball team, was a small Division I school, and offered her the best athletic scholarship package. 2

8. Ms. Brady was a member of the women s basketball team during her freshman and sophomore years at Sacred Heart. 9. While a member of the basketball team, Ms. Brady received a full athletic scholarship that covered her tuition, room, board, sports gear, books, computer, and other academic expenses. 10. As part of the basketball team, Ms. Brady also was guaranteed a summer job at Sacred Heart s basketball camp. Furthermore, because of her association with the athletic department over the summer, she was able to receive housing for the summer. 11. Ms. Brady s scholarship was subject to NCAA regulations and was renewed in the summers of 2000 and 2001 in accordance with NCAA regulations. 12. On June 11, 2001, Sacred Heart renewed Ms. Brady s athletic scholarship, granting her $25,710 for the 2001-2002 academic year. 13. Later in June 2001, Ms. Brady discovered that she was pregnant. 14. She immediately informed Edward Swanson (Coach Swanson), the coach of the women s basketball team, about her pregnancy and her intention to continue the pregnancy to term. 15. Coach Swanson responded to this information by telling Ms. Brady that he would talk to the school administration about her status and would get back to her. 16. A few days later, Coach Swanson talked with Ms. Brady and told her that he and other unidentified officials within the Sacred Heart administration had decided that, because of her pregnancy, Ms. Brady would be a distraction to the team, that she had to sit out the academic year at home in Pennsylvania, and that she no longer would receive her scholarship. 3

17. Ms. Brady disagreed with this decision and explained her disagreement to Coach Swanson, but he told her he was going to take away her scholarship and that she should attend community college near her parents residence in Pennsylvania if she wanted to continue her education. 18. Ms. Brady, who was working as a counselor at Sacred Heart s basketball camp at the time, became so upset by Coach Swanson s decision that she left camp in the middle of the week. 19. Coach Swanson also telephoned Tara Brady s father, Mr. Sean Brady, and told him that Ms. Brady could not remain on the basketball team or stay at school during her pregnancy. 20. Mr. Brady told Coach Swanson that his daughter should attend school during the fall semester. Coach Swanson disagreed and insisted that Ms. Brady s continuing school while pregnant would be an insurance liability to the university, a health risk for Ms. Brady, a distraction to the team, and a risk to Coach Swanson s job. 21. Ms. Brady pleaded with Coach Swanson to allow her to remain in school and repeatedly requested to be placed on medical redshirt status while remaining a member of the team. This status would have enabled her to keep her scholarship, attend school, and be a team member, although she would not be allowed to compete. 22. Coach Swanson refused Ms. Brady s repeated requests both to remain in school and to be placed on medical redshirt status. 23. At no point did Ms. Brady volunteer or desire to leave the team or school during her pregnancy. 4

24. Upon information and belief, at no point did Coach Swanson follow NCAA regulations for registering Ms. Brady as a medical redshirt. 25. Instead, prior to the 2001 fall semester, Coach Swanson withdrew Ms. Brady from school, rescinded her full academic scholarship, and removed her from the basketball team, all based solely on Ms. Brady s pregnancy and her decision to continue the pregnancy to term. 26. Pursuant to Coach Swanson s instructions, Ms. Brady did not return to school in the fall of 2001. Also as directed by Coach Swanson, Ms. Brady did not participate in any basketball team activities. Yet, she continued to live in Connecticut and supported her teammates by attending all of her team s home games. 27. During the fall of 2001, Mr. Brady telephoned Coach Swanson and asked again if his daughter could stay in school while pregnant. Once again, Coach Swanson responded that she could not. 28. Sometime in late November or early December 2001, Ms. Brady attended a Sacred Heart women s basketball game as a spectator and noticed that her status was listed in the game s program as medical redshirt. She was shocked to see this heading because she had not been permitted to keep her scholarship, attend school, and be a team member as were other athletes who were medical redshirts. 29. Also sometime in early December 2001, Ms. Brady and her family watched a special on HBO about pregnant college athletes. The information presented in the program led Ms. Brady to believe that she could have stayed on campus and remained a member of the basketball team even though she was pregnant. 5

30. Upon seeing the HBO special and realizing that Coach Swanson had mistreated and misled her, Ms. Brady became severely emotionally distressed. 31. Also sometime in early December 2001, Ms. Brady and her family learned that she was at risk of losing her medical insurance if she did not continue as a full-time student and that the loss of medical insurance would impose great financial hardship on her and her family. 32. Ms. Brady s father again called Coach Swanson to ask if his daughter could return to school and the team. Again the coach refused, telling Mr. Brady that it was his team and up to him to decide what to do about Ms. Brady s situation. 33. Rather than continue to abide by the decision of Coach Swanson, on or about December 23, 2001, Sean Brady, along with Ms. Brady s mother, Cindi Brady, had a phone conversation with Donald Cook, the Sacred Heart Athletic Director, and Kim Callicoatte, the NCAA Compliance Officer, regarding their daughter s reinstatement to school. 34. As a result of that phone call, officials of Sacred Heart reinstated Ms. Brady s full athletic scholarship and allowed her to return to school for the 2002 spring semester. Yet, they told her that she should wait until after the basketball season to approach Coach Swanson about her status with the team. 35. Ms. Brady returned to school as soon as she could and started attending classes in January 2002. 36. Ms. Brady gave birth to a baby boy, Sean, on February 1, 2002. She returned to classes five days later, on February 6, 2002. 37. Once the women s basketball season ended, Ms. Brady tried to approach Coach Swanson to talk about her desire to return to the basketball team. Claiming that he was acting on 6

the instruction of Don Cook, Coach Swanson refused to talk to her. 38. Ms. Brady then met with Don Cook about her problems with Coach Swanson. Mr. Cook denied he had told Coach Swanson not to talk to Ms. Brady but did question Ms. Brady about her ability to play basketball after giving birth. 39. In March 2002, a basketball team member invited Ms. Brady to attend a postseason scrimmage with the team, and Ms. Brady attended. 40. After the scrimmage, Ms. Brady received word from the same team member that Coach Swanson had told the team that it was not permitted to scrimmage with Ms. Brady. 41. On or about March 25, 2002, at a meeting arranged by Don Cook, Coach Swanson told Ms. Brady that the women s basketball program was moving forward and doing well without her and that she would not receive her scholarship for the 2002-03 academic year. 42. On or about April 4, 2002, Ms. Brady received written notice that Sacred Heart had not renewed her scholarship for the 2002-03 academic year. 43. Each of these decisions represented a terrible disappointment to Ms. Brady and a major financial problem, as she was counting on remaining in school and rejoining the team after delivering her baby. 44. Ms. Brady appealed the decision not to renew her scholarship. A hearing was held on May 10, 2002, before the Ad Hoc Financial Aid Review Committee (Aid Committee). 45. At that hearing, Coach Swanson admitted that he removed Ms. Brady from the basketball team and rescinded her athletic scholarship. 46. On May 14, 2002, the Aid Committee ruled that Ms. Brady s scholarship would be renewed for the 2002-03 academic year. 7

47. After the Aid Committee s decision, Ms. Brady also was reinstated to the basketball team. She contacted Coach Swanson to effectuate her return. 48. However, once Ms. Brady was back on the team, Coach Swanson refused to talk directly with Ms. Brady and required her to communicate with him through an intermediary. 49. Also, after being reinstated to the team, Ms. Brady was not invited to two team events that took place in late May and early June 2002. 50. After fighting for her right to be reinstated to school and the basketball team and then being treated terribly after reinstatement, Ms. Brady became emotionally distressed and extremely frustrated and upset by the way Sacred Heart handled her situation. 51. On or about July 17, 2002, Ms. Brady informed Sacred Heart that she was withdrawing from school because she felt that she was not and would not be treated by Coach Swanson in a fair manner. 52. Ms. Brady was unable to transfer to another NCAA Division I school and immediately play basketball with a full scholarship because NCAA rules would have required her to sit out a year before playing basketball. 53. In August 2002, Ms. Brady enrolled at West Chester University, a NCAA Division II school, where, after having to prove herself again as a talented basketball player, she is currently a center on the women s basketball team. 54. West Chester University provides Ms. Brady with a partial athletic scholarship that pays only a portion of her tuition and no other expenses. 55. Upon information and belief, Sacred Heart has permitted other student-athletes who have suffered season-long injuries to remain in school and continue as members of their 8

respective athletic teams, and Sacred Heart never has rescinded such students scholarships. 56. On information and belief, Sacred Heart has permitted male student-athletes who have fathered children to remain in school and continue as members of their respective athletic teams, and Sacred Heart never has rescinded such students scholarships. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF TITLE IX (AGAINST SACRED HEART) 57. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 56. 58. By its conduct described above, Sacred Heart, a federally financed educational institution, subjected Ms. Brady to discrimination in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681, and its implementing regulations. 59. As a result of Sacred Heart s discriminatory treatment, Tara Brady suffered lost educational and professional opportunities and benefits as well as severe emotional distress. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF BREACH OF CONTRACT (AGAINST SACRED HEART) 60. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 59. 61. Sacred Heart breached a valid contract binding upon both parties when it rescinded Ms. Brady s scholarship and withdrew her from school. 62. As a result of that breach of contract, Tara Brady suffered lost educational and professional opportunities and benefits. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF 9

TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL OR BENEFICIAL RELATIONS (AGAINST EDWARD SWANSON) 63. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 62. 64. Edward Swanson knew of Tara Brady s contractual or beneficial relationship with Sacred Heart and intentionally and tortiously interfered with that relationship, causing actual loss to Tara Brady. 65. As a result of that tortious interference, Tara Brady suffered lost educational and professional opportunities and benefits as well as severe emotional distress. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (AGAINST EDWARD SWANSON) 66. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 65. 67. Through conduct that he should have realized involved an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress, Edward Swanson caused Tara Brady to suffer severe emotional distress that might have resulted in illness or bodily harm. 68. As a result of that negligent infliction of emotional distress, Tara Brady suffered lost educational and professional opportunities and benefits in addition to severe emotional distress. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 10

WHEREFORE, Tara Brady respectfully asks this Court to award the following relief: (a) Enter an order declaring that Sacred Heart s actions violated Tara Brady s rights under Title IX and breached the binding scholarship contract between Tara Brady and Sacred Heart; (b) Enter an order declaring that Edward Swanson tortiously interfered with Tara Brady s contractual or beneficial relations with Sacred Heart and negligently inflicted emotional distress upon Tara Brady; (c) Enter an order permanently enjoining Sacred Heart from all unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex and requiring Sacred Heart to institute and enforce a comprehensive athletics and pregnancy policy that complies with Title IX; (d) Award compensatory damages stemming from Tara Brady s loss of equal access to educational opportunities, resources, and/or benefits, her loss of contractual or beneficial relations with Sacred Heart, and the emotional distress she suffered; (e) Award punitive damages; (f) Award reasonable attorney s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988; (g) (h) Award taxable costs of this action; and Award such other relief as this Court may deem proper. REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL 11

Ms. Brady requests a trial by jury as to all claims to which she is entitled under law. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Pulda Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn, & Kelly 557 Prospect Avenue Hartford, Conn. 06105 (860)-570-4626 Hope A. Comisky Richard J. Williamson Maureen Q. Dwyer Pepper Hamilton LLP 3000 Two Logan Square Eighteenth & Arch Streets Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799 (215) 981-4000 Terry L. Fromson David S. Cohen Lauren L. Sorrentino Women s Law Project 125 S. Ninth St. Suite 300 Philadelphia, PA 19107 (215)928-9801 Dated: March 24, 2003 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12