CCG authorisation Case Study Template. NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group. Patient Navigation (PatNav) 3 of 3

Similar documents
CCG authorisation Case Study Template NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group. Urgent Care Redesign

NHS standard contract letter templates for practice use

REQUIREMENT. Identify a minimum of 4 theme areas which are considered to have caused concern for patients during 2012/13

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

5. Does this paper provide evidence of assurance against the Governing Body Assurance Framework?

REPORT TO CROYDON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY Meeting in Public. 30 October 2012

Chase Farm Paediatric Assessment Unit Frequently Asked Questions October 2016

Implementation of a colorectal 2-week wait telephone triage pathway. Melinda Kemp Lead CNS for 2WW Pathway Cassie Dovey Lead Colorectal CNS

The interface between primary and secondary care Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers

Milton Keynes CCG Strategic Plan

REFERRAL TO TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY

Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Length of stay case study. October 2014

JOB DESCRIPTION. Pharmacy Technician

SWLCC Update. Update December 2015

Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery

Referral Management Programme Report to the CCG Board

Managing Elective Waiting Times A checklist for NHS health boards

Utilisation Management

Improving Healthcare Together : NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton clinical commissioning groups Issues Paper

Kingston Clinical Commissioning Group. NHS 111 Service Specification

Performance and Quality Report Sean Morgan Director of Performance and Delivery Mary Hopper Director of Quality Dino Pardhanani, Clinical Director

Author: Kelvin Grabham, Associate Director of Performance & Information

REPORT TO MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY PART 1

Appendix 1: Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group Risk Register and Board Assurance Framework - 9th April 2013

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

SUPPORTING PLANNING 2013/14 FOR CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPs

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

Putting patients at the heart of an integrated diabetes service

Plans for urgent care in west Kent:

Hospital Generated Inter-Speciality Referral Policy Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives

Integrated Care in North Central London

Sandwell Secondary Mental Health Service Re-design consultation

Seven day hospital services: case study. South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust

This paper explains the way in which part of the system is changing to become clearer and more accessible, beginning with NHS 111.

NHS England London Southside 4th Floor 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT. 24 th July Dear Daniel, Fiona and Louise. Re: CCG Annual Assurance

Policy for Patient Access

Rapid improvement guide to appointment slot issues

Update on NHS Central London CCG QIPP schemes

NHS. Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services. NHS Improvement - Diagnostics. NHS Improvement Diagnostics CANCER

Children and Young Peoples Health Dataset (CYPHS) Presentation for Casemix Community Expert Reference Group

Hillingdon 111 Programme: An introduction to the new 111 telephone helpline and Directory of Services (DOS) Helen Delaitre, Lead for Unscheduled Care

Recommendations of the NH Strategy

This SLA covers an enhanced service for care homes for older people and not any other care category of home.

Bristol CCG North Somerset CGG South Gloucestershire CCG. Draft Commissioning Intentions for 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 27 September 2017 Agenda Item 5.2

Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group Clinical Leadership Meeting Minutes

DELIVERING THE LEFT SHIFT IN ACUTE ACTIVITY THE COMMUNITY MODEL

James Blythe, Director of Commissioning and Strategy. Agenda item: 09 Attachment: 04

Committee is requested to action as follows: Richard Walker. Dylan Williams

NHS 111 Clinical Governance Information Pack

Mental Health Short Stay

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations

The Local Health Economy : Understanding Finance in the NHS

Wolverhampton CCG Commissioning Intentions

NHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30TH NOVEMBER C Hickson, Head of Management Accounts

18 Weeks Referral to Treatment (RTT) Standard Recovery Planning and Assurance Framework

THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER

NORTH EAST ESSEX CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP CONSULTANT TO CONSULTANT REFERRAL POLICY

Mental Health Crisis Care: Barnsley Summary Report

Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Access Policy

Personal health record (PHR) case study.

PATIENT RIGHTS ACT (SCOTLAND) 2011 ACCESS POLICY FOR TREATMENT TIME GUARANTEE

Main body of report Integrating health and care services in Norfolk and Waveney

November NHS Rushcliffe CCG Assurance Framework

Delivering the Five Year Forward View. through Business Intelligence

Integration learning to support responding to the Parliamentary Review of Health and Social Care in Wales and the delivery of new models of care

Minutes of Part 1 of the Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Tuesday, 26 th January 2016

Tier 4 Review Findings

Our Journey to Discharge to Assess (D2A)

Ambulatory emergency care Reimbursement under the national tariff

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Your Care, Your Future

Engaging clinicians in improving data quality in the NHS

Clinical Assessment Services

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust & Wolverhampton CCG consultation on proposals to deliver planned care at Cannock Chase Hospital

ACCESS POLICY FOR ELECTIVE CARE PATHWAYS

Managing Waiting Lists and Handling Referrals Nickie Yates, Head of Information & Contracting

ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES POLICY FOR CONTINUING HEALTHCARE FUNDED INDIVIDUALS

Diagnostics FAQs. Frequently Asked Questions on completing the Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity monthly data collection

Background and progress

OCCG SERVICE SPECIFICATION (2017/18) PRIMARY CARE SERVICE FOR THE PROVISION OF ARRHYTHMIA DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES

Longer, healthier lives for all the people in Croydon

Business Case Authorisation Cover Sheet

Agenda item 7 Date 2/2/2012

Community capacity mapping

Trust Operational Policy. Elective Access

London s Crisis Care Coordination Function

Process Mapping Tool Kit

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015

Governing Body meeting on 13th September 2018

Oxfordshire Primary Care Commissioning Committee. Date of Meeting: 3 January 2017 Paper No: 9

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Equality Impact Assessment Tool for Frontline Patient Services

Job Description. Job title: Uro-Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist Band: 7

Framework for Cancer CNS Development (Band 7)

Any Qualified Provider: your questions answered

Efficiency in mental health services

IUC and Vanguard. Greater Nottingham Integrated Urgent Care 1

Economic analysis of care pathways for Prostate Cancer follow up services

How are we doing? Adult Local Services at the heart of our community. Leisure Centre F RUIT & VEG

Transcription:

CCG name: Case study title: CCG authorisation Case Study Template NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group Patient Navigation (PatNav) CCG case study number: Does the case study provide core evidence? Does the case study provide supplementary evidence? Patient groups 3 of 3 Mothers and newborns People with need for support with mental health People with learning disabilities People who need emergency and urgent care People who need routine operations People with long-term conditions People at the end of life People with continuing healthcare needs Y Y Word length for this case study 882 (up to a maximum of 3,000 words in total across the submitted case studies) If yes, state domain criteria by deleting as appropriate: 1.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2.1, 4.3.1, 5.1, 6.2 If yes, state for which domain criteria: 3.1.1D,3.1.2B,4.2.1C Please tick all relevant: X X X 1

1) Context Overview We created a simple, low cost process where administrators help to navigate patients through their pathways, to ensure patients only attend follow-up outpatient appointments when their presence is absolutely necessary. This has saved 3905 appointments and 162,000 net and is being rolled out across specialties, and to other hospitals. Why Patient journeys are frequently inefficient and include appointments that do not add value: Test results missing when the patient attends, Patients attend only to be discharged, following normal test results, The appointment results in new tests being ordered, when based on the available information they could have been ordered beforehand, Telephone appointments can be more efficient and preferable for the patient We learned this from: The results of the National Inpatient Survey for Croydon University Hospital Feedback from individual patients to GPs Discussions with consultants and outpatients staff. Observation of 80+ outpatient appointments The effect was: Poor patient experience Pressure on 18 week access Inefficient use of resource, for the hospital and the CCG. Involvement When Commissioners GPs Patients Hospital Director of Operations Urology Service Lead & Urology Consultant Clinicians across specialties The service was piloted within Urology in April-August 2011. Since then, the service has continued to roll out to a specialty each month, on average, in the QIPP programme. 2

2) Action The CCG proposed the introduction of Patient Navigation as a collaborative improvement with the hospital, to be piloted in a service with a high first to follow-up ratio. The lead consultant for Urology was particularly engaged with the concept of Patient Navigation, so Urology became the pilot. Virtual Clinics replace actual clinic time. The Patient Navigator, a Band 3 administrator, books patients they believe to be appropriate into an upcoming virtual clinic and ensures that all the information required to make a clinical decision is available at the virtual appointment. This includes requesting case notes from medical records, finding test results on IT systems and printing information on shared care protocols with primary care. The consultant/clinician attends the virtual clinic in the same way that they would attend an actual outpatient clinic. The Patient Navigator attends with the case notes and test results for each of the virtual patients. Typically, with the support of the navigator, the consultant/clinician will review approximately 25 patients in a onehour session. The navigator captures the clinical decision made by the clinician and takes the following actions: 3

This enables a change in the pathway from: to 4

In addition, the Patient Navigator acts as the lead for Patient Navigation in a minimum of one specialty, including: Supporting GPs in securing discharge of patients that the GP believes could be cared for in primary care, by liaising directly with the appropriate consultant, gaining agreement to discharge the patient, informing the GP of the consultant s decision and undertaking the necessary admin duties to ensure that the patient is discharged as per hospital procedures Becoming the knowledge-point for their lead services, becoming the point of contact for GPs and Commissioners for queries and redesign for that service Meeting regularly with commissioners to discuss trends becoming apparent during virtual clinic, informing commissioning decisions and pathway redesign. The pilot in Urology established a method, which was rolled out to other specialties. Patient Navigators start by attending outpatient clinics and reviewing outpatient clinic letters to improve their understanding of the specialty. They meet with specialty clinicians to understand which patients would be suitable for a virtual clinic (eg what a normal result may be). Early in the project, financial results were limited, and the scheme was considered for closure. However, the CCG s leading clinicians took up the case and championed the initiative. Dr Tony Brzezicki, then leading one of our Pathfinder CCGs, resolved some early obstacles with the lead consultant in Urology. He presented the benefits to an Open Meeting of GPs. He spotted the opportunity for the Patient Navigators to act as a point of contact in the hospital for GPs. Now, as a result of this idea, the Navigators visit GP practices regularly to explain how PatNav can help GPs to discharge patients back into their care. 3) Impact 5

3,395 inappropriate appointments were saved, with a net saving to the CCG of 162,000 from 1 August 2011 to 30 September 2012. Improved first:followup ratios: Projected net savings for 2012/13 are 421,000. Patients only attend hospital when a physical examination or face to face consultation required Waiting times are reduced as inappropriate appointments taken out of the system Patient pathways become more robust, and clearer to the patient. Patient experience is improved. Trends are analysed and reported on, to inform commissioning decisions and pathway redesign GPs have a dedicated point of contact within the hospital through which they can discuss referral queries and pathway ideas, or to request that patients are considered for discharge back to primary care Croydon University Hospital now fund 3 additional Patient Navigators in specialties where activity reductions have been agreed with the CCG, and are seeking to take over the whole team from 2013. The approach has been extended to Daycases, Endoscopies and Colonoscopies, and will soon extend to ward discharges and ambulatory care. The CCG is collaborating with the four other CCGs in SW London to introduce PatNav to St George s Hospital, and discussions are underway to spread the approach to Enfield. 6