RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

Similar documents
RESOLUTION ADOPTINGPRINCIPLES AND APPROVING A LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECTS AND FUNDING REQUESTS FOR REGIONAL MEASURE 3

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

Finance Committee October 18, 2011

15 1. John Yehall Chin Elementary Safe Routes to School Project;

Long Range Transportation Plan

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Date: To: From: Subject: Guidelines. Summary BACKGROUND. and equity public and. blueprint. The Transportation. tailored. sources.

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Memorandum Plans and Programs Committee June 21, 2016

MEMORANDUM. July 7, 2016

STRATEGIC PLAN. for July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

Mission Bay Master Plan File No M September 27, 1990

SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (TA) 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CA MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

REPORT TO THE DULLES CORRIDOR COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT FOR CLAIMS CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE DULLES CORRIDOR METRORAIL PROJECT

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

Memorandum. P:\Lifeline Program\2014 Lifeline Program\Call for Projects\LTP Cycle 4 Call - Memo.doc Page 1 of 7

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Authority Board March 26, 2013

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

AGENDA. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bacciocco Auditorium, 2 nd Floor 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos, CA 94070

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5

FISCAL & COMPLIANCE AUDITS

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 11/30/17 RESOLUTION NO

State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Update. State Route 91 Advisory Committee June 4, 2010

TRANSMITTAL THE COUNCIL THE MAYOR TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED. ERIC GARCETTI Mayor. To: Date: 03/16/2016.

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

2016 Measure B Program Areas

Members: Peter Tannen. Page 6:00 1.

RE: Plans and Programs Committee May 15, 2012

SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATIONS AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR PROGRAMS AUTHORIZED BY PROPOSITION 84 FUNDING

Petaluma City Council Goals and Priorities for 2017 and 2018

Oakland Fund for Children and Youth Meeting of the Planning and Oversight Committee (POC)

Dr. Edward Chow, Health Commission President, and Members of the Health Commission

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

LIFELINE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS

SILICON VALLEY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR BART EXTENSION TO MILPITAS, SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

VTP Highway Program. Semi-Annual Report April 2013

9 WHEREAS, Planning Code, Section provides for the imposition of interim zoning

Subject: Lifeline Cycle 4 Grant Funding

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action.

Managed Care Organization Hospital Access Program Hospital Participation Agreement

City of Seattle Partnering Agreement. December 2017

3. Award and execute contract modifications for up to $1,200,000.

San Mateo County Measure A Grade Separation Program

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

PLANNING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

A. The term "Charter" means the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco.

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA M E M O R A N D U M

@Count Adminlstrato~s 51

City of Greenfield Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency. Meeting Agenda October 24, :00 P.M.

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

San Francisco to San Jose (Caltrain) / HNTB

Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

BALBOA RESERVOIR PROJECT Recap: Project History & January CAC Meeting

SUBJECT: ACTIONS RELATED TO THE MINETA SAN JOSE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - PERIMETER SECURITY TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

James Berg, Chief of Police Oliver Collins, Acting Captain, Operations Division

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

NOW, THEREFORE, the Navy and the School District hereby agree as follows:

Puget Sound Gateway Program

STATUS AND KEY ACTIVITIES

Staff Report. (925)

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MINUTES OF JACKSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING APRIL 26, 2016

CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DOWNTOWN RETAIL & RESTAURANT BUSINESS GRANT PROGRAM

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Memorandum Plans and Programs Committee February 12, 2013

J:\2006\Memo Items\7 - July 2006\Lifeline Transportation Program FY0607.doc Page 2 of 5

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting 13

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2877

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

193i4 X5()JPSg0 1 (-9

BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Request for Proposals for Exterior Concrete Structural Analysis Services for The Mount Umunhum Radar Tower Project

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

REPORT TO THE DULLES CORRIDOR COMMITTEE

A. CALL TO ORDER /PLEDGE/ INVOCATION Mr. Frohlich called the meeting to order and led the pledge. Mr. Lincoln led the invocation.

Transcription:

BD041018 RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 04-2647 WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE U.S. 101/I-280 MANAGED LANES PROJECT IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $227,000 AND TO NEGOTIATE AGREEMENT PAYMENT TERMS AND NON-MATERIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, The San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (FCMS) is a performance-based assessment of strategies for improving travel time and reliability for travelers on U.S. 101 and I-280 in San Francisco that is focused on producing near and mid-term recommendations for implementation in the next five to ten years; and WHEREAS, The need for the study was identified in the 2013 San Francisco Transportation Plan, which forecasts a continued increase in demand for travel by San Francisco residents, visitors, and workers to and from Downtown and the Eastern Neighborhoods and the Peninsula and South Bay; and WHEREAS, In December 2017, through Resolution 18-25, the Transportation Authority Board unanimously approved the appropriation of $200,000 in Prop K sales tax funds to fund the next phase of the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes project, which will produce of the Project Study Report/Project Development Support (PSR/PDS) report as required by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for projects that affect the state highway system; and WHEREAS, In order to advance the project, Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 must be executed with Caltrans; and WHEREAS, Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 defines the responsibilities for both the Transportation Authority and Caltrans for project development work required for the project; and WHEREAS, The Transportation Authority is responsible for all project costs, including Page 1 of 4

BD041018 RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX preparation of the PSR/PDS report, and reimbursement to Caltrans for review and approval of the PSR/PDS; and WHEREAS, Budget for services identified in this agreement will be provided by Prop K sales tax funds appropriated through Resolution 18-25, $500,000 in Congestion Management Agency planning funds, and an additional $750,000 in Measure A transportation sales tax funds provided through a funding agreement with San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA); and WHEREAS, Sufficient funds for Fiscal Year 2017/18 project activities are included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget amendment and funds for next fiscal year will be reflected in that fiscal year s budget; and WHEREAS, At its March 28, 2018 meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee considered and adopted a motion of support for the staff recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 with Caltrans for the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes project in a total amount not to exceed $227,000; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Transportation Authority hereby authorizes the Executive Director to execute Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 with Caltrans for the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes project in a total amount not to exceed $227,000; and be it further RESOLVED, That the Executive Director is hereby authorized to negotiate contract payment terms and non-material contract terms and conditions; and be it further RESOLVED, That for the purposes of this resolution, non-material shall mean contract terms and conditions other than provisions related to the overall contract amount, terms of payment, and general scope of services; and be it further RESOLVED, That notwithstanding the foregoing and any rule or policy of the Transportation Authority on the contrary, the Executive Director is expressly authorized to execute agreements and amendments to agreements that do not cause the total agreement value, as approved herein, to be Page 2 of 4

BD041018 RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX exceeded and that do not expand the general scope of services. page 3 of 4

Agenda Item 12 Memorandum Date: March 28, 2018 To: Transportation Authority Board From: Eric Cordoba Deputy Director Capital Projects Subject: 4/10/18 Board Meeting: Authorize the Executive Director to Execute Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 with the California Department of Transportation for the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes in a Total Amount Not to Exceed $227,000 and Negotiate Agreement Payment Terms and Non-Material Agreement Terms and Conditions RECOMMENDATION Information Action Adopt a Motion of Support to Execute Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 with the California Department of Transportation for the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes in the County of San Francisco and part of San Mateo County in a Total Amount Not to Exceed $227,000, and Authorize the Executive Director to Negotiate Agreement Payment Terms and Non-Material Agreement Terms and Conditions. SUMMARY To address freeway congestion on the U.S. 101/I-280 corridor, the Transportation Authority is conducting a study to explore the feasibility of a carpool or express lane from the U.S. 101/I-380 interchange near San Francisco International Airport into Downtown San Francisco. The final report for this study will be released in May 2018. The next phase of work will establish the purpose and need and range of alternatives for the U.S. 101/I-280 Managed Lanes project and produce the Project Initiation Document (PID) or Project Study Report/Project Development Support Report (PSR/PDS) as required by the California Department of Transportation, also known as Caltrans, for projects that affect the State Highway System. In order to advance the project, Cooperative Agreement 04-2647 must be executed with Caltrans. The agreement defines the responsibilities for both the Transportation Authority and Caltrans for project development work required for the project. Through the agreement, Caltrans is requesting reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $227,000 for work associated with this agreement. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other: Page 1 of 3

Agenda Item 12 DISCUSSION Background. The San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (FCMS) is a performance-based assessment of strategies for improving travel time and reliability for travelers on U.S. 101 and I-280 in San Francisco. The FCMS is focused on producing near and mid-term recommendations for implementation in the next five to ten years. The need for the study was identified in the 2013 San Francisco Transportation Plan, which forecasts a continued increase in demand for travel by San Francisco residents, visitors, and workers to and from Downtown and the Eastern Neighborhoods and the Peninsula and South Bay. Introducing active management to existing freeways can help move both current and future travelers in the corridor more reliably and efficiently. An update on preliminary results and ongoing outreach for FCMS is provided in a separate agenda item for this same meeting. We anticipate seeking Board approval of the final report for FCMS this spring. Caltrans approval is required for the next phase of project work and for implementation of any modifications to the State Highway System. Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647. The overall project budget for the next phase of work in which we will prepare the PSR/PDS, is $1,450,000. We have secured full funding for this phase including $200,000 from a Prop K appropriation approved in December 2017, through Resolution 18-25; $500,000 in CMA planning funds, and an additional $750,000 in Measure A transportation sales tax funds provided through a funding agreement with San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA). Our initial schedule anticipates completion of the project development phase, including Caltrans review and a signed PSR/PDS by all parties, by January 2019. Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2647 defines the responsibilities for both the Transportation Authority and Caltrans for project development work required for the project. Government Code section 65086.5 authorized Caltrans to review and approve PIDs prepared by local agencies as reimbursed work. Caltrans responsibilities include review and approval of the PSR/PDS prepared by the Transportation Authority, provision of relevant Caltrans proprietary data and maps for the project area to the Transportation Authority, participation in project development team meetings, and provision of independent quality insurance of the work performed by the Transportation Authority and its consultants. The culmination of this phase of work will be approval of the PSR/PDS and hence approval to move into the environmental clearance phase. The Transportation Authority is responsible for preparation of the PSR/PDS, and reimbursement to Caltrans. Project costs will be shared between the Transportation Authority and SMCTA. The latter is covering the costs associated with the portion of the project that is in San Mateo county extending from the U.S. 101/I-380 interchange near San Francisco International Airport to the San Francisco county line. Caltrans staff have reviewed the project description and evaluated the expected level of effort. FINANCIAL IMPACT Budget for services identified in this agreement will be provided for by Prop K sales tax funds, federal CMA planning funds and Measure A sales tax funds from SMCTA. Amounts corresponding to this Page 2 of 3

Agenda Item 12 year s anticipated expenditures are included in the Transportation Authority s proposed Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Amendment. CAC POSITION The CAC considered this item at its March 28, 2018 meeting and unanimously adopted a motion of support for the staff recommendation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS None. Page 3 of 3