Indirect Costs/Facilities & Administrative/Overhead

Similar documents
Financial Administrator Development Program: Indirect Costs/Facilities & Administrative/Overhead

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200

INDIRECT COST POLICY

Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs

Understanding F&A THE RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT NETWORK. Presented by. TRAIN at the University of South Florida

Policies Superseded: ACAD 301 (portion) Revised: January 2016: March 2016

Indirect Cost Rates Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding F&A THE RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT NETWORK. Presented by. TRAIN at the University of South Florida

Policy(ies) Superseded: ACAD 301 (portion) Revised: January 2016, March 2016, March 2017

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS - UPDATE FEBRUARY 2015

Base. Base Determination and Cost Sharing. Bases represent the direct cost activities of an institution. Generally they consist of: 2/10/2014

Institutional Directions and Challenges:

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Policy for Cost Sharing and Matching Funds on Sponsored Projects Effective July 1, 1998

Office of Sponsored Programs Budgetary and Cost Accounting Procedures

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (New Uniform Guidance)

UC San Diego Policy & Procedure Manual

U.S. Patents Awarded in 2005 Top 20 Universities

Cost Sharing Administrative Guidelines

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200

UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. AOA Conference Sacramento, CA January 12, 2014

Effective: April 1, 2016

Academic Medicine Investment in Medical Research Results of AAMC Survey. NECA Conference September 29, 2015

UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. Budget Officers Meeting January 28, 2015

STATEMENT OF POLICY PURPOSE

Facilities (F) & Administrative (A) Costs Rate

University of Pittsburgh SPONSORED PROJECT FINANCIAL GUIDELINE Subject: SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING

Division of Research & Graduate Studies. Office of Grants and Contracts

OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN

Uniform Guidance Sponsored Projects Services

Gifts vs. Grants Implications for Indirect Costs

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. AU SPAN Martha Taylor Larry Hankins

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SERIES: SESSION 2 BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP Amber Jensen Sarah Marcotte November 17 th, 2016

An Exercise in Effort

Special Edition: MAXIMUS Impact Assessment of January 2017 Updates to CAS Best Practices Manual. February 24, 2017

Subcontract Monitoring

OUTGOING SUBAWARD GUIDE: INFORMATION FOR UWM PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS VERSION 1, JULY 2015

UNIFORM GUIDANCE - IMPLEMENTATION 2 CFR 200 SUMMARY. Office of Contracts and Grants December, 2014

Guidance on Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries

Vanderbilt University Policy for Cost Sharing on Sponsored Projects

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

7/1/16 - until amended - 9.1%

Tuition, Fees, and Room & Board Rates Academic Year

FAQ S FOR UNIFORM GUIDANCE

MSU s Financial Administrator Development Program Post-Award Contract and Grant Administration

Patti Manheim, Director, OCGA

University of Pittsburgh

Federal Grants Compliance Training

Finding Funding, Budget Preparation, and Proposal Submission for Sponsored Research

Effort Reporting Again

Research Administration at Emory Foundation Program DAY THREE: Sponsored Projects Administration

Finding Funding, Budget Preparation, and Proposal Submission for Sponsored Research

45 CFR 75 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Health and Human Services Awards

Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring

Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs per A 21. University of Missouri System Published 2009

Developing Proposal Budgets

The Rollout of OMB A-81 and its Effect on UH

Presenter. Changes to Federal Programs & Single Audits (A-87, A-21, A-122, A-102, A-110, A-89, A-133 & A-50) The New OMB Uniform Guidance

Table of Contents. Introduction 2 How to Use This Guide 2 Best Practices for Budget Preparation 2

Financial Research Compliance. April 2013

Template D Plain-crimson-dark 1

AFOSR GRANTS OVERVIEW AFOSR. Air Force Office of Scientific Research. RINA MARTINEZ and MATT SLOWIK Air Force Office of Scientific Research

UNIFORM GUIDANCE IMPLEMENTATION

Sponsored Programs and Research Compliance SUBRECIPIENT COMMITMENT FORM

Johns Hopkins University Research Administration (JHURA) Fall 2015

UNIFORM GUIDANCE UPDATE

Office of Planning and Budgets Facilities Planning and Space Management

Uniform Guidance. Overview and Implementation Plan. November 21, 2014

Guide for Proposal Development and Sponsored Research

Administrative and Indirect Costs. What s the difference?

STUDENT FEE RATES and CONCEPTUAL BUDGET PLAN FY 2015

Writing a Proposal Budget: Lab

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION FORUM Allowable Costs. Uniform Guide

OMB Uniform Guidance: Cost Principles, Audit, and Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards

Financial Oversight of Sponsored Projects

Working with Gift Funds

SJSU Research Foundation Cost Share Policy

The Metis Foundation Office of Grant and Contract Administration SUBRECIPIENT INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE FORM

RSP 101: Introduction to Research and Sponsored Programs Policies and Procedures. Marcus W. Shute, P.E., Ph.D.

Building a Budget. Rebecca Hunsaker Gaye Bugenhagen University of Maryland, College Park

Activity Reporting System (ARS)

Costing and Procurement Updates

2013 U. of Iowa 86% 85% 87% 2014 U. of Colorado Boulder 84% 86% 86% U. of Nebraska Lincoln 84% 83% 82%

Table of Contents. Introduction 2 How to Use This Guide 2 Best Practices for Budget Preparation 2

University of Illinois FY13 Federal Audit Corrective Action Plans Incomplete Documentation in Client Eligibility Files

Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. AUSPAN Martha Taylor

Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs Cost Sharing. Published 2010

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY 7A-4 COST SHARING POLICY. Responsible Executive: Gary K. Ostrander, Vice President for Research

UC BERKELEY. The Seven Deadly Sins. Proposal Development. October 16, 2014

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA Office for Research COST SHARING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

US News and World Report Rankings Graduate Economics Programs Ranked in 2001

Communication No. 1, Attachment E, FY15 Indirect Cost Recovery Distribution Policy & Special Policy

2014 Salary and Benefits Report

OMB Uniform Guidance ( UG ) Briefing. ASRSP & OSR Brown Bag Tuesday, January 27 th

Accounting and Administrative Manual Section 100: Accounting and Finance

10 CFR 600: KNOW YOUR REQUIREMENTS

Accounting and Administrative Manual Section 100: Accounting and Finance

COST SHARING POLICY COST SHARING POLICY PAGE 1 OF 8

EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY. Sponsored Research Accounting Cost Share Guidelines

Office of the Controller and Business Services

Transcription:

Indirect Costs/Facilities & Administrative/Overhead Presenters: Andrew Cascaddan, Manager, Contract and Grant Administration Ryan Kelemen, Administrator/F&A Analyst, Contract and Grant Administration

Agenda Introduction to Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs F&A Rate Negotiation Process F&A Rate Recovery Questions 2

Introduction to F&A Costs Resources required to undertake a sponsored project include associated direct and indirect (or F&A) costs Direct costs costs that can be specifically identified to a sponsored project F&A or Indirect costs costs incurred for common or joint objectives and cannot be readily identified with a specific sponsored project these are real costs! Institutional Support cost share, startup funds, etc. F&A is calculated internally and negotiated with the federal government to arrive at an agreed-upon amount 3

Is it true that our 55% means ½ the project costs are for F&A? Contrary to popular belief it is actually about 1/3 Project with $100,00 in Direct Costs and F&A of 55%: $100,000 65% Direct Costs* $55,000 35% F&A Costs** $155,000 100% Total Project Costs *$100,000/$155,000 = 65% **$ 55,000/$155,000 = 35% 4

Receive MSU Financial Statement Sepa costs (direct vs. indirect) Allocate indirect costs to functions Calculate the actual administrative limit Submit proposed Negotiate final 5

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final University fiscal year financial data is received for analysis 6

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Identify direct versus indirect costs Sepa indirect costs into cost pools Direct costs are sepad by function 7

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Identify direct versus indirect costs Reminder: Direct costs are costs that can be specifically identified to a sponsored project Examples Faculty salaries (teaching/research), lab supplies (teaching/research), travel, services, sub-awards 8

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Two main components of indirect costs Facilities Operations and Maintenance of Plant heating, lighting, custodial services, landscape services, campus security, routine building maintenance (~$155 million)* Building and Equipment Costs depreciation of buildings and equipment, interest costs associated with new buildings/equipment (~$85 million)* Library portion of the cost of books and other library materials (~$21 million)* *Amounts reflect FY14 Financial Data 9

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Administrative General and Administrative Expenses expenses of executive administration, MSU business office, other central admin offices: President, Provost, Personnel, General Counsel, Controller, etc (~$103 million)* Departmental Administration administrative and support expenses of departments, colleges and divisions that support common or joint activities (~$146 million)* Office supplies, Administrative salaries, etc. 10

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Administrative Continued Sponsored Projects Administration expenses of units that administer sponsored projects: Office of Sponsored Programs (pre-award), Contract and Grants Administration (post-award), Vice President for Research and Graduate studies; provides services for multi-colleges, e.g. proposal review, fiscal management, etc (~$14 million)* 11

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Major Functions of the University Instruction teaching and training activities of an institution; departmental research Organized Research all research and development activities of an institution that are sepaly budgeted and accounted for Other Sponsored Activities programs and projects which involve the performance of work other than instruction and organized research Other Institutional Activities all other activities of the institution including athletics, residential housing, etc. 12

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final ADMINISTRATIVE COST POOLS INSTRUCTION Limited to 26% General Administration Departmental Administration Sponsored Program Administration Student Services MTC* ORGANIZED RESEARCH FACILITY COST POOLS Building Depreciation Building External Interest Land Improvements Equipment Depreciation Operations and Maintenance Library Space OTHER SPONSORED ACTIVITY OTHER INSTITUTIONAL ACTIVITY *Modified Total Costs 13

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final Divide the F&A costs by direct costs for each function to get the actual 14

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final F&A Rate Components for On-Campus Research Calculated 67%, Capped at 64%, Negotiated 55% effective 7/1/16-6/30/19 General Administration 7.7% Departmental Administration 12.70% Sponsored Projects Administartion 5.60% Total Administrative Cost Pools 26% Building Depreciation 3.9% Equipment Depreciations 3.3% Interest 2.7% Operations & Maintenance 18.1% Library 1.0% Total Facilities Cost Pools 29.0% Total F&A Rate 55% 15

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final MSU submits proposed to cognizant agency Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Calculation of the is reviewed and on-site visit may be scheduled Rate is proposed and submitted every 3-4 years 16

Sepa costs Allocate indirect costs to functions Submit proposed Negotiate final After the review is completed, the federal auditors will negotiate with MSU to determine a final Length of agreement Escalating vs. fixed Compromise Next proposal due 12/31/2018 using FY 2017-18 data, 6 months after fiscal year end Goal to establish s to be used beginning 7/1/2019 17

F&A Rate Recovery Most sponsored projects pay the negotiated Exceptions: USDA 22/30% TFFA = 28.205 or 42.857% of MTDC or TDC USDE ~8.0% TDC State of Michigan 20% TDC (when not federal flow-thru) Non-profits 0% or per organization s written policy Testing (including clinical trials) 26% TDC If sponsors don t pay full F&A, more institutional support devoted to research Indirect Cost Waiver/Reduction Process Written justification from PI submitted to departmental chair, then college research associate dean If approved, request is submitted to VPRGS for consideration 18

F&A Rate Recovery How are F&A expenses recorded on the project? KFS automatically records nightly to object code 6487 The is applied according to the F&A base Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) which is all direct expenses except equipment, graduate tuition, and the amount of subawards > $25k Total Direct Costs (TDC) Many others During FY 16-17, F&A charges recovered $73 million for MSU 19

F&A Rate Recovery F&A Recovery - $73M 10.0% 10.0% 7.5% Back to College ($7.3M) Back to Department ($7.3M) 72.5% To VPRGS ($5.5M) F&A Support to the General Fund ($52.9M) 20

How does MSU s compare to the Big 10? For FY 17, the average F&A for organized research in the Big 10 was 54.5% Big Ten Facilities & Administrative Rates F&A Cognizant Agency Institution 2016-17 1 ONR Illinois - Urbana-Champaign 58.6% 2 ONR Penn State **57.2% 3 HHS Northwestern 56.5% 4 HHS Indiana 56.0% 5 HHS Rutgers *55.0% 6 HHS Michigan *55.0% 7 HHS Purdue 55.0% 8 HHS Michigan State 55.0% 9 HHS Ohio State *54.0% 10 HHS Wisconsin 53.0% 11 HHS Iowa 52.5% 12 HHS Maryland *52.0% 13 HHS Minnesota 52.0% 14 HHS Nebraska 52.0% Big Ten Average 54.5% HHS Wayne State 54.0% ONR Stanford *58.0% HHS Duke 59.0% ONR MIT *54.7% HHS Harvard - Medical School 58.5% * = Provisional Rate ** = Fixed Rate 21

Questions? Contract and Grant Administration F&A contacts: Evonne Pedawi pedawiev@cga.msu.edu Andrew Cascaddan cascadda@cga.msu.edu Kasey Schiellerd marsh229@cga.msu.edu Ryan Kelemen kelemenr@cga.msu.edu 22

Appendix: Review of Federal Regulations 2 CFR Part 200 the Uniform Guidance (or UG) Appendix III Replaced OMB Circular A-21 Developed to appropriately allocate indirect costs to sponsored projects Establishes accounting principles upon which the indirect cost must be calculated Costs must be allocable, allowable, reasonable, consistently treated, and necessary Division of Cost Allocation (DCA) Best Practices Manual Developed to assist DCA staff in reviewing and analyzing College and University F&A proposals 23