Kotava A. 1*, Sasnouskaya A. 2. Belarus. Chernobyl Aaccident, The Gomel Regional Hospital, Belarus ABSTRACT

Similar documents
INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT

Radiation protection and public health of nuclear professionals and the public living in the vicinity of radiation hazardous facilities in Russia

In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful. Message from DR HUSSEIN A. GEZAIRY REGIONAL DIRECTOR WHO EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION.

MONITORING HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES EXPOSED TO IONIZING RADIATION

Report of the Expert Meeting on Epidemiological Studies Targeting Emergency Workers at the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

République du SENEGAL. Un Peuple -Un But -Une Foi CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY. Seventh Review Meeting. Vienna-Austria

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TECHNICAL SERVICES CATALOGUE

Convention on Nuclear Safety

WHO's response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident (2012) Seminar on the recovery and reconstruction of Fukushima, 3 September 2014, Geneva

PROBLEMS OF WORLD AGRICULTURE

Emergency Preparedness Near Nuclear Power Plants

Massey University Radiation Safety Plan Version

NUCLEAR MEDICINE James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital

Safety Reports Series No.40

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Advance Unedited Version

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK. 1 July 2003 No IX-1672 Vilnius (As last amended on 2 December 2010 No.

AAPM Responds to Follow up Questions from Congress after Hearing on Radiation in Medicine

Nuclear Disaster Guidelines. for Preparedness, Response and Recovery. (Version: March 31, 2016) (English Translation)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

<Introduction> <Reply to the recommendations>

Technical Volume 3 Emergency preparedness and response

Public Health Consequences of Radiation Emergencies: WHO Agenda

Note verbale dated 3 November 2004 from the Permanent Mission of Kazakhstan to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee

Safely Working with Radioactive Materials

Emergency Management Nuclear Power Generation

University of Maryland Baltimore. Radiation Safety Procedure

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Homeland Security Recommendations Related to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Radiation Licensure and Management (RS100) Course

Ukraine Consolidated Operational Plan 2014

Fifty Shades Of Gray A Medical Physicists Guide as RSO. Kevin Nelson, Ph.D, CHP Mayo Clinic Florida

Radiation Protection Adviser (RPA) Register

ALBANIA FIRST REGULAR NATIONAL REPORT. under the. Convention on Nuclear Safety

Norwegian Nuclear Emergency Organisation

Identifying and addressing the support needs in relation to medical and industrial applications of ionizing radiation and lessons learned

Sotirios Economides Department of Licensing & Inspections Greek Atomic Energy Commission

LAW ON RADIATION PROTECTION AND SAFETY

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS SERIES. GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS No. GSR Part 1 (Rev.1)

Responding to A Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) Medical Aspects of Response

2011 FDA SOUTHEAST REGION ANNUAL SEMINAR. 11/09/11 Karen Smallwood, RRHR

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2012), Vol. 148, No. 1, pp. 3 8 Advance Access publication 20 February 2011

AREN T WE READY YET? CLOSING THE PLANNING, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY GAPS FOR RADIOLOGICAL TERRORISM

Updated activities on Occupational Radiation Protection in ILO

COURSE CATALOGUE. Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defence Centre of Excellence VYSKOV, CZECH REPUBLIC JCBRN COE

REVIEW Chernobyl Humanitarian Assistance and Rehabilitation Programme (CHARP),

Radiation Protection Procedures for the Cincinnati Proton Therapy Center (CPTC)

International and national actions in response to a radiation emergency

WORKSHOP on "Radiation monitoring and radiation protection culture for people living in long-term contaminated areas"

The Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Radiation Therapy Practice Standards


Republic of the Philippines Department of Science and Technology PHILIPPINE NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE Commonwealth Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City

Ch. 129 NUCLEAR MEDICINE SERVICES CHAPTER 129. NUCLEAR MEDICINE SERVICES GENERAL PROVISIONS

IMO CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. Report of co-operation activities with the IAEA. Note by the Secretariat

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Occupational Ionizing Radiation Protection Program

Mobile Positron Emission Tomography

EMERGENCY ARRANGEMENTS OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Radiological Consequence Management

Regulatory framework and safety requirements for new (gen III) reactors

Practical Recommendations to Occupational Health Services of Nuclear Facilities for Monitoring of Internal Exposure to Radionuclides

Final Report. (Main Text)

RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL LICENSE

Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Guidelines. Preparedness, Response and Recovery. Saving lives, changing minds.

Medical Response To Radiation Incidents

The Alphabet Soup of Regulatory Compliance: Being Prepared for Inspections. Objectives. Inspections are often unannounced, so DOCUMENTATION

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE), number 297, of the 12 th of December 2002

University of Sussex. Radiation (Ionising) Safety Policy

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

APEx Program Standards

Historical Timeline of Major Nuclear Events

H. APPENDIX VIII: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 8 - HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES

National Report related to the Convention of Nuclear Safety

Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 1. Emergency Exposure Dose Control in the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP 4

Royal Decree 1546/2004, of June 25 th, approving the Basic Nuclear Emergency Plan

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION AND HEALTH CANADA

Worker Safety and Health Support Annex. Coordinating Agency: Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH)

Establishing a Radiation Safety Culture in Health Care

The Code of Conduct on the Safety of Research Reactors

7 TH REVIEW MEETING OF THE CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY VIENNA, AUSTRIA, 27 MARCH - 7 APRIL 2017

DOE Response to a Nuclear or Radiological Incident. Alan Remick Consequence Management Programs Manager

GSR Part 7 Requirements

Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex

Emergency Scenarios. National Response Plan. Example: Goiânia, Brazil September Goiânia Radiological Accident. Goiânia Public Health Impacts

EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY. ISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, March 1, 2012

Dose estimation of the radiation workers in the Cyclotron and. PET/CT center

Civil Protection Operational Management Plan of Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Provisional translation)

DIRECTIVES. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2009/71/EURATOM of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

RADIATION SAFETY: IS. E. Vano (Madrid/ES) Monday 28 th Sept :30 12:45 MY CATH LAB DOING ENOUGH? Radiation Protection Pavilion

Measures to Strengthen International Co-operation in Nuclear, Radiation and Transport Safety and Waste Management

09/13/2017 ZAPAD-2017 Q&A. The Warsaw Institute Foundation

RMM 700 Radiation Safety Program for University Laboratories

Note verbale dated 5 November 2004 from the Permanent Mission of Ghana to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee

Thank you for inviting me to discuss the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

Awareness of Necessity for Radiation Risk Communication among Municipalities Adjacent to Nuclear Power Plants in Japan

1540 COMMITTEE MATRIX OF PANAMA

We are very excited to provide this update for your Radiation for Dental Safety Manual.

Projects GNOME and SEDAN The PLOWSHARE Program

The ASRT is seeking public comment on proposed revisions to the Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy titled Medical Dosimetry.

Transcription:

Creation and development of the State Registry of persons exposed to radiation as a result of the Chernobyl accident and other radiological emergencies in the Republic of Belarus Kotava A. 1*, Sasnouskaya A. 2 1 Center of Health and Social Development, The Yanka Кupala State University of Grodno, Belarus 2 Regional Center of the State Registry of Persons Exposed to Radiation as a Result of the Chernobyl Aaccident, The Gomel Regional Hospital, Belarus ABSTRACT Introduction: Creation and development of a national database of persons from Belarus affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe has been an important and actual challenge. Its aim is to help health care professionals make an objective evaluation of this group s health status and monitor it prospectively. Updated data on creation, development, objectives and challenges of operating the State Registry of persons exposed to radiation as a result of the Chernobyl accident and other radiation emergencies (State Registry) are presented. Material and methods: Analysis of the system used by registrars to collect and process information in the State Registry. General ways to improve the process, define strategic objectives of the registry s functions and categories of persons affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe have been suggested. Results: State Registry is a unique medical information system in terms of volume (more than 200,000 people registered thus far) and territorial scope (whole territory of Belarus). Conclusion: State Registry provides long-term personalized account of changes in state-observed contingents and forms the basis for an objective evaluation of the disaster s real impact on the health of the affected population in Belarus. Key words: affected population, State Registry, Chernobyl catastrophe. * Corresponding author: Ozeshko 22 str., Grodno, Belarus, 230023 Tel.: +379296195954, Fax. +375232485562 Email: kottova@mail.ru (Aksana Kotava) Received: 18.05.2012 Accepted: 25.08.2012 Progress in Health Sciences Vol. 2(2) 2012 pp 7-11. Medical University of Bialystok, Poland 7

Prog Health Sci 2012, Vol 2, No2 : Creation and development State Registry Chernobyl acciden INTRODUCTION The Chernobyl nuclear plant accident is one of the most significant technological disasters of the second half of the 20 th century in terms of radiation levels and population and territory exposed. As a result of this accident a vast territory of the former Soviet Union, even at a great distance from the plant had been contaminated with a complex mixture of radionuclides. Belarus, Ukraine and Russia were affected the most [1, 2]. From the first days after the accident, the government of the former Soviet Union, organized and carried out extensive activities to estimate the radiation and examine and protect the population. In June 1986 the All-Union Distributed Registry of Persons Exposed to Radiation Following the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (AUDR) was created. The purpose of the AUDR was to provide long-term, automated, personal account of persons exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl accident, their children and future generations, doses, assessment of health status and its changes. In 1987, were developed and approved by the Statute of Union a distributed registry of persons exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl accident, the basic registration and accounting forms registry and instructions for their completion. In accordance to its Statute the State Registry included observations on four levels: union, republic, region and district. Many scientific institutions were involved in the creation of AUDR. At the district level AUDR was positioned in the hospitals directly involved in the medical care of the affected population. This level included collection, accumulation, storage and updating information on individuals by filling out registration and account forms and sending them to higher level (regional) registry. One of the main objectives of AUDR was to establish a database of individual annual doses and identify categories of observation. State Registry also included data on chronic conditions from before the accident and, changes in health after the accident. The volume and quality of recorded medical and dosimetric information, organizational structure, interdepartmental and territorial cooperation in the AUDR allowed to assume that it would have become the first objective database on the radiological consequences the Chernobyl accident based on direct radiation-epidemiological studies in liquidators and population of the contaminated territories. However, in 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, AUDR ceased to exist. Since December 1991, this database has expanded to include personal medical and dosimetric information on 659 292 people, including 284 919 participants of liquidation of the consequences of the catastrophe. More than 47% registered are from the Russian Federation (22.5% - in Russian liquidators) and Belarus (26.5% - the population of the affected areas of the country) [1,2]. In the most affected countries: Belarus, Ukraine and Russia independent personalized registries have been created, including only the citizens from those countries. Information on the population of Belarus affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe from AUDR has been passed on to Belarus. The purpose of this study is to present an update on the creation, development, objectives and challenges of operating the State Registry of persons exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl and other radiation emergencies. MATERIAL AND METHODS Since 1992, improvement of the former Belarusian part of AUDR has been assigned to the Belarusian Center of Medical Technology, Computer Science, Management and Health Economics. First of all, while maintaining continuity, the registration and accounting documents and registries, instructions for their completion, medical ambulatory cards have been revised. The most important strategic goal - computerization of all levels of the registry, was carried out by entering the information into the database directly from primary medical records. In 1992-1993 new software was created allowing for automatisation of data collection, statistical reporting, converting and up-loading data from clinical examination. New software passed the experimental stage, which revealed various inaccuracies, errors, later adjusted [2-4]. At the same time work was carried out on the testing accounts from the registry and medical records. Additions and changes in accounting forms of the registry, medical records, obtained during testing were developed in 1994. In 1993 the Government of Belarus passed a resolution "On creation of the Belarusian State Registry of Persons Exposed to Radiation due to Chernobyl", which approved the Statute of Belarusian State Registry. The main objectives of the State Registry are: collection of personal data of persons exposed to radiation; automated registration doses received; documentation of chronic diseases from before the accident; monitoring of health status of irradiated population after exposure, its changes and results of rehabilitation; 8

dynamic long-term updating of the information on the observed contingent; creation of information and reference data sets on users request; control of the completeness and compliance with the terms of clinical examination of the observed individuals; international exchange of medical and dosimetric information. The purpose of the State Registry was to provide information on the outcomes of clinical examination of the population affected by the Chernobyl accident; therapeutic interventions based on this examination and structure, nature and trends of morbidity and disability in other regions. It also develops recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease; improvement of health care of the population exposed to radiation and scientific studies on health effects of the accident. RESULTS Presently the collection of personal medical data is performed annually in more than 200 regional offices of the State Registry on four levels: health care organization, district level, regional and republican level. Employees of the State Registry collect information about individuals from their medical records, enter data in the State Registry, and are responsible for their quality and reliability. All the information about the victims is concentrated in the medical cards and in the history of the child's development, exactly from these primary documents health information gets directly into the database [5-7]. There are 7 groups of primary accounting (GPA) and 4 risk groups (A, B, C, D) (Table 1). First group (1 GPA): 1.1 - persons who took part in the 1986-1987 liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe within the evacuation zone (exclusion) or performed duties there during that period (including temporarily seconded), including military personnel and conscripts; 1.2 - persons who took part in the 1988-1989 liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe within the evacuation zone (exclusion) or performed duties there during that period (including temporarily seconded or sent), including military personnel and conscripts and persons who took part in the 1986-1987 decontamination of, buildings, livestock in the areas of primary and subsequent resettlement, including military personnel and conscripts. Second group (2 GPA): persons evacuated or who fled from evacuation zone in 1986. Third group (3 GPA): persons residing or working in the areas of primary and subsequent resettlement who resettled on their own or who had left these areas after a disaster. Fourth group (4 GPA): those born to those in group 1-3, except for children enrolled in groups 2 and 3. Fifth group (5 GPA): persons residing or working in the area with the right to resettle in the area or stay with periodical radiation control and residents of the settlements where the average annual effective dose exceeded 1 millisievert (msv) per year. Sixth group (6 GPA): persons involved in or affected by the elimination of accidents and their consequences in other civil or military nuclear facilities, as well as the victims of these accidents or as a result of tests, exercises or other activities related to nuclear facilities, including nuclear weapons. Seventh group (7 GPA): disabled as a result of the Chernobyl disaster of the number of citizens who do not have the status of "victim of the Chernobyl catastrophe", as well as children and adolescents with a disease of a blood-forming organ (acute leukemia), thyroid gland (adenoma, cancer) and malignant tumors if they have not been assigned to other groups of primary records. Risk group A (from subgroup 1.1 GPA): persons who took part in 1986 in the aftermath of the Chernobyl catastrophe within the evacuation zone. Risk group B (from 2 and 3 GPA): persons who received radiation doses due to external and internal exposure in the first year after the accident from lists generated by the Republican Dispensary of Radiation Medicine. Risk group C (from 2 to 5 GPA): persons exposed to radioactive iodine as a result of the Chernobyl accident, from 0 (in utero) to 18 years old at the time of the accident (born 1968-86) and not assigned to risk group B. Risk group D: people who due to internal exposure measurements of human radiation spectrometer during the year exceed the allowable levels and do not tend to decrease. In the beginning of 2012 the State Registry contained information on more than 200 000 people 1-4, 6, 7 GPA. 149 468 are alive. 12.8% from this number were children 0-17 years old. The largest numbers of registered persons in 1-4, 6, 7 GPA was in Gomel (51.2%), Mogilev (13.2%) and Minsk region (11.3%). In other areas, records contain almost the same number of people affected by Chernobyl (Minsk city - 8.5%, Brest region - 5.5%, Vitebsk region - 5.1%, Grodno - 5.2%). The distribution of the affected population from the Chernobyl accident is presented in 9

Prog Health Sci 2012, Vol 2, No2 : Creation and development State Registry Chernobyl acciden Table 1. Population of the Republic of Belarus according to the group of primary accounting (GPA) DISCUSSION GPA % 1 41.4% 2 3.1% 3 42.3% 4 12.1% 6 0.2% 7 0.9% Compared with year 2000, the number of persons registered at the national level of the State Registry decreased by 17.3%, which is associated mainly with natural population decline. Considering that cohort of persons of the 1-4 GPA is "closed" and will continue to age over next few years, we should expect accelerated decline, primarily due to natural causes (death). It is therefore essential to carry out studies to assess the medical and biological consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe at the union level and collect information on persons living in the areas with the right to resettlement and periodic radiation control (5 GPA). This will provide unique, up-to-date data on the health of individuals residing in the territories of radioactive contamination and exposed to chronic irradiation in low doses from 1986. Such data collection (5 GPA) has not been conducted at the union level. In addition, the State Registry does not include radiation doses not only for people currently or previously living in the contaminated areas, but also the liquidators. It makes it impossible to conduct an in-depth radiationepidemiological analysis. 113000 people from Belarus participated in the liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe, of whom 94798 people have been registered in the State Registry. Radiation doses are known only for about 7000 of registered liquidators, i.e. less than 10% of all liquidators. In addition, these doses varied greatly from a few msv to several hundred msv in individuals in the same conditions exposed to radiation in the same locality and at the same time. So far, dose verification has not been completed and no consensus on dose reconstruction exists among dosimetry specialist [8]. Thus, 25 years after the Chernobyl catastrophe, Belarus has no reliable information on individual radiation doses (including in liquidators) which would render itself suitable for scientific analysis. CONCLUSIONS State Registry is a unique medical information system in terms of volume (more than 200,000 people registered) and territorial scope (whole territory of Belarus). It gives us hope that this personalized, longitudinal database of health status changes in Belarusian population will answer the question about the real health costs of the Chernobyl accident. Improvement in the functioning of the State Registry needs to include: maintaining continuity and support at the appropriate level of State Registry, ascertainment of individual radiation doses of the general population and liquidators, improved staffing levels and technical support, collection and analysis of the information on persons from 5 GPA at the union level. A unique complex of medic-organizational measures (a form of medical-preventive action) on liquidation of consequences of the Chernobyl accident is developed. The complex operation and development of multifunctional systems registry ensures and is a reliable information base of radiation, health and social protection and rehabilitation people of the Belarus, exposed to ionizing radiation and large-scale epidemiological studies can be carried out. Conflicts of interest The authors have declared no conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1. Polyakov CM, Grakovich AA, Malakhova IV. Chernobyl registry - the main data base for studying the health status of populations affected by of the Chernobyl accident. Medical and biological aspects of the Chernobyl accident. 2005 Jan; 20-24. 2. Bennett B, Repacholi M, Carr Z. Health Effect of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes. Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group "Health". Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006; 160 p. 3. Antipova S, Denisevich N, Lomath L. Methodical guidelines for collection and control of information about persons, be taken into account in the Belarusian State registry of persons exposed to radiation as a result of the Chernobyl accident. Minsk; 2001; 35 p. 4. Nadolnik L, Netsetskaia Z, Vinogradov V. Effect of long term exposure to low dose gamma irradiation on the rat thyroid status. Radiats Biol Radioecol. 2004 Jan-Feb; 44(1): 76-80. 5. Tsyb AF, Dedenkov AN, Ivanov VK, Stepanenko VF, Pozhidaev VV. [The 10

development of an all-union registry of persons exposed to radiation resulting from the accident at the Chernobyl atomic power station]. Med Radiol (Mosk). 1989 Jul; 34(7):3-6. (Russian) 6. Baverstock K, Williams D. The Chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health consequences and the international response. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sept; 114(9):1312-17. 7. Sasnouskaya A. Health status of the Republic of Belarus affected by of the Chernobyl accident. Gomel. 2006; 250 p. 8. Shevchuk VE, Gurachevsky VL. 20 years after Chernobyl accident. Consequences in Belarus and their overcoming. Minsk. 2006, p. 96-104. 11