Improving Preparedness For Radiological Transportation Events Through Exercises

Similar documents
WM 07 Conference, February 25 March 1, 2007, Tucson, AZ. Response to a Transportation Accident Involving Radioactive Material Simplified

Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) Update May 12, 2015

PLANNING DRILLS FOR HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY AND INCIDENT PREPAREDNESS AND TRAINING

2015 Oregon Crude Oil-Rail Response Facilitated Tabletop Exercise Final After-Action Report

Lessons Learned from Local Radiation Shelter Exercises and Resources to Help Advance Radiation Preparedness Within Local Jurisdictions

MEDICAL-TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: BIOLOGICAL/INFECTIOUS DISEASE

NARR Quarterly Call. NARR Quarterly Call. September The Community Reception Center (CRC) Tool Kit. September 2016

SCENARIO 19 Emergency Planning for a Propane Bulk Plant

STATE EMERGENCY FUNCTION (SEF) 10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. I. Lead Agency: Colorado Department of Public Safety (CDPS), Colorado State Patrol (CSP).

National Incident Management System (NIMS) Implementation Plan

Emergency Preparedness Planning Document Introduction

Course offerings for the 2010 Fire School include:

COURSE CATALOG. Safety Through Preparedness

REGULATORY DOCUMENTS. The main classes of regulatory documents developed by the CNSC are:

ESF 10 Hazardous Materials

AUSTIN/MOWER COUNTY-WIDE

Professional Emergency Manager Exam Application

Emergency Preparedness and Primary Care Medical Practices Session 4 Evaluation of the Plan Training and Exercises

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex

July Hospice Fundamentals All Rights Reserved 1. Plan for the Webinar. The Rule & Its Dates

NYS Office of Homeland Security Upcoming Training Course spotlights and schedule

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation

The Emergency Operations Plan. The Emergency Operations Plan

Public Safety and Security Response Exercise Evaluation Guide

Coldspring Excelsior Fire and Rescue Standard Operating Policies 6565 County Road 612 NE Kalkaska, MI Section 4.13 INCIDENT COMMAND MANAGEMENT

EPA's Radiological Emergency Response Program

EXPLOSIVES ATTACK IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TECHNICAL SERVICES CATALOGUE

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) Davison County

DHS FY08 Standards Program Review Date: August 21, 2008

Radiological Emergency Response Exercise. Medical scenario. Exercise Manual

CMS CoPs: New Emergency Preparedness Requirements

Emergency Preparedness

Spill Prevention and Control

ASTHO s Radiation Partnership Portfolio Update

CIP Cyber Security Incident Reporting and Response Planning

ESF 10 - Oil and Hazardous Materials

Worker Safety and Health Support Annex. Coordinating Agency: Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH)

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TABLETOP EXERCISE JULY 13, 2005 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL OMAHA, NEBRASKA

INCIDENT COMMANDER. Date: Start: End: Position Assigned to: Signature: Initial: Hospital Command Center (HCC) Location: Telephone:

Code Silver/Active Shooter Tabletop Exercise for Community Health Centers

Radiological Preparedness in the Tampa Bay Region

Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP)

NIMS and the Incident Command System (ICS)

THE EFFICACY OF THE TABLE-TOP OR 'WHITE PAPER' APPROACH TO EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING OF DRILLS AND EXERCISES

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #10 Oil and Hazardous Materials

Steve Relyea 401 Golden Shore, 5th Floor Executive Vice Chancellor and

Radiological Emergency Preparedness and Response Training and Capability Development in South East Asia

National Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS)

RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (REPP)

IA5. Hazardous Materials (Accidental Release)

National Certification Program Study Guide

ANNEX D RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

Emergency Preparedness Challenges Facing Long Term Care

Program of Instruction Course Syllabus

Palm Beach County Fire Rescue

Medical Response Planning for Radiological and Nuclear Events: the Overview

Applying Radiation Protection Issues to Hospitals Radiological Emergency Preparedness

INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM Hazardous Materials LESSON ICS Hazardous Materials Refuge Area Manager

Prepublication Requirements

Pediatric Medical Surge

MODULE 3 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL OPERATIONS NFPA MISSION-SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES

GAO NUCLEAR REGULATION. Progress Made in Emergency Preparedness at Indian Point 2, but Additional Improvements Needed

WRIGHTWOOD GOLDEN GUARDIAN DISASTER EXERCISE (WGGDE) November 13-15, (ExPlan)

Emergency Management for Law Enforcement Executives. Minnesota Chiefs of Police CLEO Academy December 2, 2014

State Homeland Security Strategy (SHSS) May 24, 2004

ANNEX H HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE

NYC Radiological Planning

David Jansen PE, LEED AP Director, Office of Radiation Protection Washington State Department of Health

Center for Domestic Preparedness

Western Michigan University. Training Program

Emergency Management Coalition of Eastern Alabama. 27 February 2013

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KANSAS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. ESF4-Fire Fighting

AFTER ACTION REPORT/IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Mississippi Worker Safety and Health Support Annex

Emergency Preparedness Near Nuclear Power Plants

Emergency Management Element. CMS Rule for. HRSA Form 10 HRSA PIN Joint Commission NIMS OSHA Best Practices. Emergency

4 ESF 4 Firefighting

Tanjung Pinang, Indonesia

ANNEX Q HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The Arizona Division of Emergency Management s Use of Community Emergency Response Teams in State Exercises

State Homeland Security Strategy (SHSS) February 3, 2006

Managing Radiological Emergencies. The Hendee Brothers Eric -Waukesha Memorial Hospital Bill - Medical College of Wisconsin

2016 Final CMS Rules vs. Joint Commission Requirements

Public Health s Role in Healthcare Coalitions

Welcome to the self-study Introductory Course of the:

CYBER ATTACK SCENARIO

Jefferson Parish Emergency Management. New EOC/911 Center

FIREFIGHTING EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF #4) FORMERLLY FIRE SERVICES OFFICER

St. Paul Lutheran FSE AAR Westshore Regional CERT October 15, 2014

2018 NWO Regional Exercise

Wednesday, September 27, :00 A.M. 12:00 P.M. Kern County Public Health Department 1800 Mt. Vernon Avenue San Joaquin Room

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) TERRORISM RESPONSE ANNEX

Emergency Scenarios. National Response Plan. Example: Goiânia, Brazil September Goiânia Radiological Accident. Goiânia Public Health Impacts

Program of Instruction Course Syllabus

UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex

CRITICAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

Before we begin. Summary on CMS rule for minimum Emergency Preparedness requirements

Transcription:

Improving Preparedness For Radiological Transportation Events Through Exercises Ella B. McNeil, Manager Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Office of Transportation, U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Tom Clawson, John Riley Technical Resources Group, Inc. 3765 East Sunnyside Road Idaho Falls, ID 83406 ABSTRACT This paper describes the efforts by the Department of Energy to assist states and tribes along transportation corridors to prepare for an incident involving the transportation of radioactive materials and wastes by partnering with communities to conduct radiological transportation drills and exercises. INTRODUCTION It is estimated there are approximately three million radioactive material shipments made in the United States on an annual basis. The Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management (EM), is responsible for approximately 20,000 of these shipments per year. As the use of radioactive material increases, so does the possibility that first responders will encounter a transportation incident involving radioactive material. To ensure responders have the appropriate knowledge and skills to respond safely and effectively to transportation accidents involving radioactive material, the Department of Energy s Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) actively pursues opportunities to partner with local jurisdictions to conduct exercises involving both high- and low-level radioactive waste transportation scenarios. Using a comprehensive approach to prepare for exercises, hundreds of responders have been given the opportunity to participate in TEPP-sponsored radiological transportation exercises. A community approach is always used during the exercise development process. All potential responder agencies are invited to participate, including hospitals, law enforcement, fire departments, emergency management agencies, community aid agencies such as the Red Cross, and state and federal emergency management and radiological response assets. After participants for an exercise have been determined, each agency is strongly encouraged to complete the TEPP Needs Assessment, answering a series of questions designed to identify possible procedural, training, and/or equipment gaps that could affect the agency s ability to successfully respond to a radiological transportation accident. The Needs Assessment has been automated, so it can be completed online. The online application will automatically generate the report for the response jurisdiction. 1

The Needs Assessment is divided into two sections, planning and training, and the flow chart (see Figure 1) follows the path of each. Even if the TEPP Needs Assessment reveals adequate planning and training, the conduct of a drill or exercise can be used to validate the jurisdiction s planning and training. If the assessment reveals needed improvement areas, TEPP has model plans and procedures and training that the jurisdiction can implement. A suite of tools has been developed to aid the response jurisdictions in their readiness activities. All of the tools are readily available and can be accessed on the TEPP web site at www.em.doe.gov/otem. TEPP model procedures have been developed to assist the response jurisdiction in modifying their existing emergency plans and procedures to address a radiological transportation accident. The procedures are not allinclusive, but were developed to meet the minimum national guidance for responding to a radiological transportation accident. The procedures are designed for use by trained and qualified emergency responders, and additional procedural requirements may be implemented according to appropriate state, tribal, or local requirements. TEPP has developed six procedures that can be incorporated into a jurisdiction s existing standard operating procedures: o Hazardous Materials Incident Response Procedure o First Responder Procedure for Transportation Accidents Involving Radiological Materials o Emergency Medical Services Procedure for Properly Handling and Packaging Potentially Radiologically Contaminated Patients o Medical Examiner/Coroner Procedure on the Handling of a Body/Human Remains that are Potentially Radiologically Contaminated o Radioactive Material and Multiple Hazardous Materials Decontamination Procedure o Model Recovery Procedure Figure 1 Flow chart showing TEPP Needs Assessment process. In addition to the procedures listed above, TEPP has developed the Model Planning Annex, which provides a basic structure and annotated guidance for preparing a transportation addendum to an existing emergency plan. 2

Once the jurisdiction has addressed weaknesses that were identified in their plans and procedures, they will need to address any gaps in training. To assist agencies with responder training, TEPP developed the Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT) program. MERRTT has a modular design, consisting of 16 concise, easyto-understand modules, four textbook exercises, and five hands-on practical exercises. This design allows a jurisdiction to integrate the modules into existing hazardous material training. MERRTT addresses the training concerns of states, tribes, and local jurisdictions and provides fundamental knowledge for responding to transportation incidents involving radioactive material and builds on training in existing hazardous materials curricula. The material is designed to meet the training needs of persons serving in fire service, law enforcement, emergency medical service, emergency management, public works, or on a hazardous materials team. The MERRTT program is flexible and allows instructor delivered programs or student paced self-study. Designed in modular format, the materials include student manuals, instructor guides, and viewgraphs to facilitate delivery. A MERRTT Go-Kit provides training aids to enhance MERRTT training and contains a radiation detection device, miscellaneous radiation sources (e.g. smoke detector), a Type A package and inner container, radiation labels and placards, and a copy of the Emergency Response Guidebook. MERRTT has also been approved by the Continuing Education Coordinating Board of Emergency Medical Services for Continuing Education Hours (CEH). Medical CEHs are awarded for each module completed. Once a jurisdiction addresses all of its identified planning and Figure 2 Cover of MERRTT training weaknesses, an exercise is conducted to validate the Student Study Guide planning and training. To assist in validating a jurisdiction s planning and training, TEPP uses the Department of Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) process in preparing its drills and exercises. To begin the exercise process, an initial planning meeting is held with participating agencies where exercise objectives are agreed upon, and Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-sanctioned activities and criteria are chosen. Next, a mid-term planning meeting is conducted to review and finalize the exercise scenario package. Scenario planners also coordinate details such as selection of realistic props, including: wrecked vehicles; smoke generators or propane-generated fire props; moulage supplies for victim role-players; positioning of roadblocks to ensure unwanted traffic stays out of the exercise scene; and purchasing of lunches for players during the after-action debriefing. Before the exercises are conducted, TEPP-sponsored controller/evaluator training is offered, and briefings are conducted for both controllers/evaluators and players. In some cases, first responders participate in coached and walk-through drills prior to full-scale exercises that enable them to perform specific response functions with hands-on use of equipment while receiving step-by-step guidance from qualified controllers/instructors on proper response actions and techniques. These drills include: scene size-up and hazards assessment; setup and operation of a decontamination corridor; scene surveys and mapping; and the packaging and transfer of a contaminated patient. Tabletop exercises are sometimes conducted in advance 3

of the evaluated exercise to give participating agencies an opportunity to discuss their procedural response steps and communication protocols in a no-fault environment. In the past 18 months, TEPP has sponsored HSEEP compliant tabletops, drills, and exercises in four communities, including: one tabletop, three drills, and a full-scale exercise in North Platte, Nebraska one drill in Zachary, Louisiana two drills and a full-scale exercise in Groton, Connecticut three drills in Topeka, Kansas Figure 3 Responders at a TEPP exercise extinguish a simulated transportation fire involving radiological materials. In addition, in March 2010, three training drills and a full-scale exercise will be conducted in Lincoln, Nebraska; in April 2010, three tabletop exercises have been scheduled in Winston- Salem, North Carolina; and in July 2010, one full-scale exercise has been schedule in Storrs, Connecticut. After TEPP conducts an exercise, players are given an opportunity to self-identify problems, after which controllers and evaluators meet to review and evaluate all objectives, activities, and criteria. TEPP assists communities in the development of an After-Action Report (AAR) in accordance with DHS criteria. While TEPP personnel can make recommendations on the best way to correct identified findings, the final corrective action report is the responsibility of the host jurisdiction. Lessons learned are shared with other jurisdictions through the DHS process. For communities that would like to conduct exercises without the direct involvement and planning assistance offered by DOE, TEPP provides Drill-In-A-Box scenario manuals online that cover a variety of high- and low-level waste accident scenarios. These scenarios, which are streamlined for easy implementation, are currently being modified to incorporate DHS-compliant objectives, activities, and criteria. 4

While exercises help measure how well prepared a community is to respond to a radiological accident, the true test of preparedness has been experienced several times by agencies called upon to respond to actual radiological transportation accidents. In May 2009, twenty-six firefighters from the Beckley, West Virginia Fire Department participated in two-day MERRTT classes. Only three months later, in August 2009, these same firefighters responded to a tractor-trailer fire involving 36,000 pounds of uranium hexafluoride being transported by the DOE. Afterwards, an officer for the fire department credited TEPP training for helping his department respond calmly, quickly determine that no release of material had occurred using survey instrumentation, and stop an unnecessary evacuation that had been ordered for a nearby town. In 2008, response agencies in Indiana responded to a transportation accident involving a radiography source after participating in TEPP training. Later the same year, hazmat teams in Idaho responded to a radiological incident and release of contamination at a fixed facility after participating in a TEPP exercise. The Idaho Regional Hazmat Team also credited the TEPP training and exercise program for helping them respond successfully. CONCLUSION Figure 4 Fire Department responders from Beckley, WV were glad they went through MERRTT training before responding to an actual event involving uranium hexafluoride. The overall goal of TEPP is to address the emergency response needs of state, tribal, and local governments. This is accomplished by meeting emergency first responders training and knowledge needs, and by reducing the concerns of first responders about responding to any accident or incident involving DOE radiological materials shipments. One highly successful method of achieving this goal is by partnering with communities to conduct drills and exercises. Preparing to conduct an exercise is a comprehensive process that can be as useful as the conduct of the exercise itself. The preparation process involves conducting a Needs Assessment, improving procedures, conducting MERRTT training for response agencies, and may also include conducting hands-on coached drills for specific field response activities, and/or tabletop drills that focus on multiple agency interaction. The conduct of an exercise validates the training and procedures, and gives responders an opportunity to respond to a realistic simulation. The post-exercise process identifies areas for improvement, and corrective actions that will help agencies improve their response to radiological transportation accidents. Stakeholders participating in TEPP training, drills and exercises have provided positive feedback, even writing letters of thanks to DOE head quarters citing the effectiveness of the TEPP process. TEPP exercises, as the culmination of a comprehensive training approach, will continue to be a useful DOE tool to help prepare emergency responders at all levels across the nation. 5