Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study

Similar documents
TEX Rail Corridor Memorandum of Agreement 1

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY AMARILLO DISTRICT. AUGUST FY 2009 Quarterly Revisions

Lessons Learned for a Transit Public-Private Partnership. Phillip A. Washington, General Manager Regional Transportation District

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

Katy Trail Extension from McCommas Boulevard to White Rock Station

Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:

(This page intentionally left blank)

AGENDA. Regional Transportation Council Thursday, September 13, 2018 North Central Texas Council of Governments

Meeting Minutes. Project: Subject: Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Location: Attendees:

Strategic Projects Division

Subject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue

VTA s Capital Projects Program & BART Phase II Procurement Opportunities. VTA s Procurement Fair and Workshop. November 1, 2016

Media Contacts Regarding Hyperloop

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Amarillo District May FY 2010 Quarterly Revisions

REGIONAL 10-YEAR PLAN AND NEXT DECADE OF PROJECTS. Regional Transportation Council December 8, 2016

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Puget Sound Gateway Program

School Siting and Transportation

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Appendix F Public Meeting Summaries. F1: May 2013 Public Meeting Summary F2: September 2013 Public Meeting Summary

SUNIGA/LEMAY MULTI-MODAL AND FREIGHT CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Update. State Route 91 Advisory Committee June 4, 2010

AGENDA ITEM H-3 PAGE 57 STAFF REPORT. City Council Meeting Date: 5/8/2018 Staff Report Number: CC

Build America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

2013 Louisiana Transportation Conference

Appendix E Major Stakeholder Meeting Summaries. E1: Ash Grove Cement Company E2: Holcim E3: UPRR E3: BNSF E4: IIIPOD E5: Skyline Landfill E6: Oncor

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

June 3 5, 2014 Corpus Christi, Texas

DART EXECUTIVE STAFF Source:

SH 121: FM 423 To SH 121 At US 75 Interchange. APPENDIX B: Coordination and Policy

Innovative Project Finance

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Cheyenne desires to participate in the Business Ready Community, Community Readiness Grants Program; and

GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Streetcar Planning Update Dallas City Council Transportation and Environment Committee November 8, 2010

JOINING FORCES ALIGNING COMMUNITY & MILITARY MISSIONS

Module 3 Advance Funding Agreements between the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and a Local Government (LG) for Transportation Projects

TIGER DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM Project Application

Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing

City of Seattle Partnering Agreement. December 2017

Project Budget and Schedule Status

I-95 Southbound Collector-Distributor (CD) Lanes - Rappahannock River Crossing From Exit 130 (Route 3) To Exit 133 (Route 17)

State Project No. XXXXXX City Project No. c401807

Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION

Cotton Belt Rail Corridor Innovative Finance Initiative

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS. Classification & Documentation

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement for Construction of the Placentia Avenue Railroad Grade Separation Project.

Section 130 Program Overview and Update. James (Jim) Dahlem FHWA Office of Safety Washington, DC

Appendix A: Public Involvement Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE US 59/LOOP 20/I-69W PROJECT

NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

STATE HIGHWAY (SH) 34 FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Regular Agenda D Public Hearing D

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

Texas Department of Transportation

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

RAPTS Workshop Revenue And Project Tracking System CLOSE OUT PROCEDURES August 24, a.m.

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

North Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation Beau Memory & Rodger Rochelle

Better Cultural, Arts and Recreational Amenities. Trinity Watershed Management

SIXTH STREET VIADUCT REPLACEMENT PROJECT MONTHLY EXECUTIVE MEETING REPORT NOVEMBER 2012

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

2018 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Guidance for Urban/Metropolitan Area Installation/Bases

Coordinated Transit Consultation Meetings SmartTrack, GO RER, Relief Line, Scarborough Subway Extension June 20, 2015 Highlights Report

FINAL ACTIONS Planning Commission Meeting of January 22, 2013

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

Puget Sound Gateway Program

Status Report on LVRT Activities

SILICON VALLEY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR BART EXTENSION TO MILPITAS, SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

Finance Committee October 18, 2011

ITEM 12 - Information March 18, 2015

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

TAC Agenda Item 5A Mailout - 04/13/16

The RTD FasTracks Plan

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Updated August Metro State Aid Payment Guide

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

Texas Central High-Speed Railway Project Update / Winter 2014

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Construction of Peña Bridge - March 2013 Jersey Cutoff Bridge October Eagle Project Update. East Corridor Stakeholder Committee April 23, 2013

CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA

PEPS DIVISION. Presentation for TxDOT Alliance HUB Symposium August 18, Professional Engineering Procurement Services (PEPS)

NEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Administrative Leadership Meeting

WH EREAS, the funding will be used to provide support to the selected intern for individual semester activities related to Clean Cities support.

Paul Paine Chairman, NAS Fort Worth, JRB Regional Coordination Committee Chairman, Texas Military Preparedness Commission.

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

Regional Transit System Plan. Regional Task Force Meeting No. 1

3 Multi-contract, 38-mile roadway project adapts to face challenges PMC manages 38-mile US 290 Program in Houston US 290 Program Office

US 59 Diboll Relief Route (Future I-69) Angelina County Open House Summary and Comment Response Report March 3, 2015

Transcription:

Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study Technical Advisory Group June 19, 2009

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Project History & Accomplishments March 6, 1992 Agreement between TxDOT, UPRR and BNSF executed on North- South Trench design for I-35W/I-30 Highway Interchange Design December 1, 2003 Elected Official Briefing chaired by Congressman Martin Frost August 10, 2005 Federal Project Funding of $1,600,000 August 8, 2006 Agreements executed with City of Fort Worth, City of Arlington, Tarrant County, FWTA, UPRR and BNSF for project scope of work and local match November 28, 2006 1st Round of Public Meetings

Project History & Accomplishments May 15, 2007 Contract executed with Consultant Team and Notice to Proceed Issued November 13, 2007 2nd Round of Public Meetings February 18, 2009 3rd Round of Public Meetings January 06 June 09 18 TAG Committee Meetings

NCTCOG Project Objectives 1. Mutually acceptable to project partners, develop a set of: (1) immediate improvements & (2) mid-term improvements. 2. Achieve environmental clearance for Environmental Assessment (EA) with federal approval (FONSI) for mid-term improvements.

A A Progression of Improvements Short Term Improvements A system of at-grade solutions Commuter rail opportunities Mid-Term Improvements Grade separated solution Trench, Fly-Over or FWWR Bypass Commuter rail opportunities Long-Term Improvement Regional Rail Bypass (not part of this study and/or environmental process)

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Immediate Short -Term Improvement Package Short-Term BNSF, UPRR, and City of Fort Worth Joint Project Installing 3rd North-South Track for additional capacity Several auto/pedestrian street crossing improvements Implementation: 1 3 years Estimated cost = $70 Million Pursuing ARRA TIGER funds

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Draft Locally Preferred Alternative Recommendation Recommendation (January / February 2009) Based on Measures of Effectiveness Evaluation Results and Public/Political Input: Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA): North-South Trench with additional improvements to north and south ends. Developed as a progressive build-upon set of improvements to at-grade improvements. Improved Commuter Rail Opportunities Reconstruction of the Hole in the Wall allowing simultaneous TRE and SW2NE operations through the location. New parallel bridge over Lancaster Avenue providing double track operations between ITC and T&P Stations. Long-Term: Regional Rail By-Pass will be further studied in future as another improvement to accommodate the relocation of thrumovement trains.

Comments from Union Pacific Railroad (April / May 2009) Believes evaluation has prematurely eliminated options without full due diligence; requests continuing evaluation of all grade separation options, including: East-West Fly-Over East-West Trench (new proposed option) Very concerned about impact to rail operations during construction of a North- South Trench that resides in same footprint Concerned about capital expenditure for at-grade improvements that are thrown away with North-South trench option Requests consideration of an Offset North-South Trench that alleviates construction concerns and maintains all existing at-grade tracks Any improvement must not have any profile grade greater than 1.00% Due to existing operational criteria associated with trains in corridors approaching Tower 55 Current design has 1.39% profile grade in southbound trench Requests roads in trench for maintenance, potential 4 th track Creates extremely wide cross-section that may not fit between existing structures

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

North-South Trench w/ 3 Tracks

East West Trench

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Draft LPA Comments from City of Fort Worth Staff (May / June 2009) Opposes any major rail trench or bridge in East-West direction that: Creates significant commercial and residential real estate acquisitions Causes severe disruption to current grade-separated North-South access across I.H. 30 or the current railroad corridor Impedes ability to redevelop area immediately south of I.H. 30 Further enhances the divide between Downtown and Near South Side & Near East Side neighborhoods Requires Lancaster Avenue to remain as major east-west thoroughfare with all full capacity lanes and access; including ability for streetcar to navigate proposed grades Understands concerns of railroads regarding operational impacts during construction; which should be mitigated with North-South Trench Tower 55 Improvements should enhance future commuter rail opportunities

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

Draft LPA Comments from BNSF Railway (May / June 2009) Is also very concerned about impacts to rail operations during construction period of 2 3 years Requests further evaluation of operational impacts during construction Requests consideration to use FWWR on certain days during construction as alternate route if proposed operational phasing creates a back up of traffic attempting to get through Tower 55

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions

NCTCOG/Consultant Review & Response East-West Trench Evaluation Requires total acquisition of approximately 15 properties, partial acquisition of approximately 15 properties, and the displacement of approximately 16 structures Requires reconstruction of major street access to/from Downtown with bridge structures over trench (Main Street, Jennings Street, and proposed Hemphill-Lamar Connector) Creates new railroad tunnel underneath I.H. 35W Potentially impacts the Henderson Street underpass and bridge columns for I.H. 30 overpass Eliminates the Henderson Street/8 th Avenue/Summit Avenue ramps to/from I.H. 30 Potentially impacts the Pine Street underpass and at-grade connection to/from Everman Spur Does not enhance future commuter rail opportunities

June 19, 2009 Technical Advisory Group Meeting Week of June 29, 2009 30 day notification of upcoming public meetings July 14, 2009 Fort Worth City Council; Infrastructure and Transportation Committee July 28, 2009 Fort Worth City Council August 3, 2009 Public Meetings at Fort Worth ITC August 7, 2009 TAG Committee Meeting August 11, 2009 Fort Worth City Council Next Steps & Schedule for Public Comment August 13, 2009 Regional Transportation Council Meeting June/July 2009 (TBD) Briefings with Arlington City Council, TxDOT-Fort Worth, TxDOT-Austin

Questions & Comments Tom Shelton, P.E., AICP Senior Program Manager Streamlined Project Delivery tshelton@nctcog.org (817) 704-5633 Jeffrey C. Neal Program Manager Streamlined Project Delivery jneal@nctcog.org (817) 608-2345 Randall Heye Randall Heye Transportation Planner II Streamlined Project Delivery rheye@nctcog.org (817) 704-2545

Meeting Agenda Welcome & Introductions Approval of the April 17, 2009 Meeting Minutes Review of Project s s Goals & Objectives Status of At-Grade Improvement Design & Funding Application Receipt of Comments from Union Pacific Railroad Status of Improvement Alternatives Responding to UPRR Comments Comments from City of Fort Worth Comments from BNSF Railway Review of Improvement Alternatives Evaluation and Schedule for Public P Comment Next Steps & Questions