Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs

Similar documents
ifpti.org Research Presentation

GRANT GUIDANCE CALENDAR YEAR Retail Program Standards Grant Program.

OH Mentorship Participants

IFPTI Fellowship Cohort V: Research Presentation

This Standard applies to the essential elements of a training program for regulatory staff.

TSC Guidelines. AIPLA Headquarters Street South Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22202

FSMA User Guide. Food Safety Modernization Act Guide

Public Health Accreditation Board. GUIDE to National. Public Health Department. Accreditation

Accreditation Support Initiative (ASI) for Local Health Departments

Risk Factor Study Sharing Session Panel Discussion Session II-Questions and Answers

2017 MCAFDO Annual Conference

OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR

Pharmacy Leadership Academy

Public Health Accreditation: Advancing Quality, Improving Health

Performance audit report. Effectiveness of arrangements to check the standard of rest home services: Follow-up report

FY2010 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice Meeting. July 16, 2018

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Food Standards Agency in Wales

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 Section-by-Section Summary

DELIVERING CAREER-SPANNING, STANDARDS-BASED FOOD PROTECTION TRAINING FOR STATE AND LOCAL FOOD PROTECTION OFFICIALS.

Improving Coordinate Accuracy for Cancer Cases in Oklahoma

Using Quality Improvement to Measure and Assess Public Health Emergency Preparedness Programs: Current Strategies, Opportunities, and Recommendations

Initial Evaluation of the Public Health Accreditation Program

Public Health Accreditation Board STANDARDS. Measures VERSION 1.0 APPLICATION PERIOD 2011-JULY 2014 APPROVED MAY 2011

Monitoring Your Adult Education Providers: Policy and Guidance for State Adult Education Directors

PUBLIC WORKS ACCREDITATION PROCESS GUIDE

A Publication for Child Nutrition Professionals from the National Food Service Management Institute

Portfolio Implementation as a Means for Achievement of Standards

Would you like to submit something for possible distribution in a future PHQIX newsletter? Let us know at QI Innovator Awards

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. Avenue Joseph Anoma, 01 B.P. 1387, Abidjan, CÔTE d'ivoire

Maternal Child Health Capacity for Zika Response. F e b r u a r y 2018

Maximizing the Community Health Impact of Community Health Needs Assessments Conducted by Tax-exempt Hospitals

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Virginia Mentorship Participants

FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT FRESH and HUMAN SERVICES GRANT REVIEW

State and Urban Area Homeland Security Plans and Exercises: Issues for the 110 th Congress

2018 Grants for Change REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

POST-BACCALAUREATE TRAINING IN DISPARITIES RESEARCH GRANTS

Chapter 11. Expanding Roles and Functions of the Health Information Management and Health Informatics Professional

Activities and Workforce of Small Town Rural Local Health Departments: Findings from the 2005 National Profile of Local Health Departments Study

May 12, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Certain provisions of FSMA are already in effect, namely: Mandatory recall authority (FSMA 206).

Quality Management Plan

Outsourcing of Child Welfare Services: Has Effective Oversight Been Established?

FSMA Enforcement: The First Year

Educational Program Crosswalk for the Federal Emergency Management Agency s Emergency Management Institute Emergency Management Professional Program

HOW ONE HOSPITAL EMBRACED PATIENT SATISFACTION TRANSPARENCY

AHD Webinar Series: How Academic Health Department Partnerships Can Support PHAB and CEPH Accreditation

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT

Preceptor. Mentoring. Personal Coach. Companion. Critical. Resource Facilitator. Practice Teacher ASSESSOR

HPP-PHEP Cooperative Agreement CDC-RFA-TP

FSMA Update. Jennifer Thomas Interim Director for FSMA Operations Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration May 2018

ASTHO Environmental Public Health Tracking Peer-to-Peer Fellowship Program. Final Report

STATEMENT OF POLICY. Foundational Public Health Services

AFDO FINAL COMMITTEE REPORT

National Syndromic Surveillance Program- Community of Practice Community Charter

XL Foods Inc. Independent Review Recommendations and Government Action Plan

NLN CNEA Pre-Accreditation Candidacy Policy

IECA s 2018 Summer Training Institute


SNOMED CT AND 3M HDD: THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM (HSGP) State Project/Program: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM

Public Health Accreditation Board Guide to National Public Health Department Reaccreditation: Process and Requirements

Project Title: Fiduciary Agent Contact Info:

Effectiveness of an internal audit function

Accreditation Preparation & Quality Improvement Demonstration Sites Project. Final Report

New York State E-Plan Implementation Guide for County Local Emergency Planning Committees

1st Class Care Solutions Limited Support Service Care at Home Argyll House Quarrywood Court Livingston EH54 6AX Telephone:

VALUED PROVIDER MARCH 2014 SPOTLIGHT: CHILDREN WITH SLEEP APNEA HAVE HIGHER RISK OF BEHAVIORAL, ADAPTIVE AND LEARNING PROBLEMS

Final Report ALL IRELAND. Palliative Care Senior Nurses Network

National Public Health Performance Standards. Local Assessment Instrument

Arizona Hospital Discharge Data Submission to CDC NEPHT Network Fellowship

State Emergency Management and Homeland Security: A Changing Dynamic By Trina R. Sheets

AMCHP Issue Brief. State Title V Workforce Development Survey Training Needs and Professional Development Strategies Preliminary Findings

Expanding access to counselling, psychotherapies and psychological services: Funding Approaches

Class of 2018 Candidate Information Packet

Contract Posting: RADIUS Lab Manager First Peoples Enterprise Accelerator Program

Agriculture by Choice Program. GUIDELINES April 1, March 31, 2018

The Role of Telehealth in an Integrated Health Delivery System How Telehealth Provides the Bridge Between Patients and Healthcare Providers

Washington County Public Health

Prior Assessed Learning (PAL) Application

American Osteopathic College Disclosure to Learners For Continuing Medical Education Activities

Oregon John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor

Coalition of Food Protection Task Forces Virtual Conference Coalition Building for Integration

Draft 11/3/2017. Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

National Curriculum Standards Cooperative Agreement Grant Update

Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Alberta SPOR Graduate Studentship in Patient-Oriented Research. Program Guide

THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT --- AN APPLICATION TO TRACK POLICY, REGULATORY, AND LEGISLATIVE (PRL) INITIATIVES

Leadership in Government Fellowship

Prior Assessed Learning (PAL) Application

Discussion paper on the Voluntary Sector Investment Programme

Counselor, Social Worker & Marriage and Family Therapist Board

Quick Reference. EPSRC/Energy Systems Catapult Whole Energy Systems Scoping Studies

Review of the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act

TRAINER GUIDE FOOD SAFETY ON THE GO MODULE 2: PROGRAM DIRECTOR 2012 EDITION

RE: Docket No. FDA 2015 N FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: Focus on Implementation Strategy for Prevention-Oriented Food Safety Standards

Section II: Food Service. MPR 1 Plan Review

The SIA: Overcoming Organizational Fear of Closure

Wall St. Training Valuation Case Competition Competition Guide

Transcription:

[REPORT] September 2017 Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs Introduction The U.S. Food and Drug Administration s (FDA s) Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (Retail Program Standards) serve as a guide to regulatory retail food program managers in the design and management of a retail food regulatory program and provide a means of recognition for those programs that meet these Standards. 1 Ultimately, the Retail Program Standards are intended to support retail food regulatory agencies in preventing foodborne illnesses and deaths in local communities across the United States. This aim is met by providing the sector with the foundation for the continuous improvement of food safety regulatory programs by advancing processes driving the way foods are prepared and served within the nation s food industry. The Retail Program Standards consist of nine standards, including the following: Standard 1: Regulatory Foundation Standard 2: Trained Regulatory Staff Standard 3: Inspection Program Based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) Principles Standard 4: Uniform Inspection Program Standard : Foodborne Illness and Food Defense Preparedness and Response Standard : Compliance and Enforcement Standard 7: Industry and Community Relations Standard : Program Support and Resources Standard 9: Program Assessment Since 1999, the FDA has strongly encouraged jurisdictions that regulate food service and retail food establishments to enroll in the Retail Program Standards. With over 770 jurisdictions enrolled to date, including over 00 local health departments, the FDA provides resources and guidance to help agencies implement the Retail Program Standards. Local health departments play a major role in ensuring the food people eat every day is safe. In the United States, approximately 3,000 entities regulate food safety. The vast majority of these entities are local retail food regulatory programs; at least 77% of the 2,00 local health departments in the United States educate, inspect, or license retail food establishments. 2 Through a cooperative agreement with the FDA, the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) established a mentorship program in 2012 to support retail food regulatory programs in implementing the Retail Program Standards. The program provides peer-to-peer assistance and intensive technical support to ensure entities facilitate the standards efficiently and effectively. Experienced retail food regulatory program staff advise newer agency representatives on how to get started, overcome challenges, and best apply the Retail Program Standards to further their food protection programs. Participants also gain insight on developing and implementing policies and procedures, completing selfassessments, and conducting verification audits. Since inception, over $1.4 million has been invested in the mentorship program, which has been used to provide 124 awards to retail regulatory food programs. As seen in Figure 1, on the following page, this program has also experienced continued growth. As a result,

FIGURE 1. TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS IN EACH COHORT (COHORTS 1 ) Cohort 21 Cohort Cohort 4 7 7 17 20 Cohort 3 13 Cohort 2 Cohort 1 3 Mentor Mentee participants now include local health departments from all across the nation (Figure 2). Compared to the inaugural cohort of nine local health departments, the program has nearly tripled in size, engaging 31 agencies in the sixth and most recent cohort. The mentorship program period is typically nine to months long. However, participants often have seven to eight months to make progress on their work plan after refining and finalizing their goals and objectives with their mentors. Upon completion, participating agencies typically achieve all or the majority of their goals. Additionally, as a result of the mentor-mentee relationship, program participants are able to foster meaningful relationships to help them sustain efforts on the Retail Program Standards in the future. To better understand the impact of the Retail Program Standards and the mentorship program on participating retail food regulatory programs, NACCHO conducted a retrospective survey and a review of final reports collected from the first five mentorship program cohorts. Methods In 2017, NACCHO developed and administered an electronic assessment to 4 individuals representing enrolled agencies within the first five cohorts of the mentorship program. In conjunction with a review of 93 final reports submitted by participants from the first five cohorts, NACCHO sought to explore the following four factors: Retail Program Standards impact on retail food regulatory programs. The mentorship program s impact on retail food regulatory programs (1) conformance with the Retail Program Standards; (2) communication with their governing entity regarding their retail food program; (3) adherence to the Public Health Accreditation Board requirements; and (4) staff. Success stories with the mentorship program and Retail Program Standards. Challenges with the mentorship program and Retail Program Standards. Findings and Results General Information The assessment had a response rate of 7% (43 respondents). Among the respondents, 32 individuals were mentees, seven were mentors, and four were both mentees and mentors. NACCHO collected the final reports from 93 participants from the first five cohorts of the mentorship program. Among the final reports submitted, 4 were from mentee agencies and 29 were from mentor agencies. Retail Program Standards Impact NACCHO asked respondents six overarching questions about the impact of the Retail Program Standards on their health departments. [2] Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs

FIGURE 2. MAP OF MENTORSHIP PARTICIPANTS FROM COHORTS 1 When asked if making progress on or achieving the Retail Program Standards allowed for better identification of retail food program areas in which their agencies can have the greatest impact on retail food safety, 9% of the respondents (41) answered Strongly Agree or Agree. Nearly 90% of respondents (3) answered that they Strongly Agree or Agree that participating in the Retail Program Standards enabled staff to promote wider application of effective risk-factor intervention strategies in their agencies. All respondents answered that they Strongly Agree or Agree that the Retail Program Standards assisted their agencies in identifying program areas most in need of additional attention regarding retail food safety. In addition, over % of respondents (37) answered that they Strongly Agree or Agree that the Retail Program Standards served as a means of justification for agency leadership (e.g., Board of Health, executive management) related to decisions for maintaining or increasing food safety program budgets. Over % of the respondents (37) answered that they Strongly Agree or Agree that the Retail Program Standards improved industry and consumer confidence in their retail food protection programs. Mentorship Impact on Participants Based on the final reports submitted by members of the first five cohorts, all mentees made significant progress towards their work plan s goals and objectives and more than half met their entire work plan s goals and objectives. Common work plan items included meeting components of Standard(s), meeting a specific Standard, conducting a self-assessment, developing improvement plans, and conducting verification audits. Figure 3 illustrates the number of projects that mentees completed or achieved significant progress towards completing, categorized by Standard. Many mentees were newly enrolled in the Retail Program Standards and decided to conduct an initial selfassessment (24). Other popular Retail Program Standards included Retail Program Standard 2: Trained Regulatory Staff (19) and Retail Program Standard 7: Industry and Community Relations (11). Throughout all five cohorts, participants voiced their challenges with conformance to Retail Program Standard : Program Support and Resources due to their agency s lack of resources and funding to meet the Standard. Only one participant chose to work on this Standard, reflected in Figure 3. In addition to meeting or making significant progress toward meeting the Retail Program Standards, both mentees and Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs [ 3 ]

FIGURE 3. MENTEES MET OR MADE SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS/PROJECTS Self-assessments 24 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 4 17 21 19 Standard 4 Standard 7 11 Standard 1 Standard 9 mentors stated that their staff benefited from participation in the program. Other benefits included the following: A deeper understanding of the benefits related to making progress toward meeting the Retail Program Standards; Recognition of participants within their agency as subject matter experts on the Retail Program Standards; Ability to network and interact with other health departments in the mentorship program; Ability to identify and pursue additional resources available to help conform to Retail Program Standards; Increased staff skills learned through attending trainings at FDA courses and seminars, HACCP training, and association conferences; Knowledge on improving interactions and relationships with retail food industry; and Improved public speaking skills from presenting and discussing the Retail Program Standards. The final reports also included numerous success stories about the positive impact the mentorship program and the Retail Program Standards have had on their retail food programs. Through participation in the mentorship program, respondents indicated they were able to do the following: Connect with a peer network to support their work on the Retail Program Standards; Provide food safety training to the public; Provide evidence of the need for additional food safety program staff; Apply for additional funding opportunities for the Retail Program Standards; Use funding for inspectional supplies and equipment needed for the Retail Program Standards and retail food safety program; Gain staff buy-in and support for the Retail Program Standards; and Develop and/or improve standardized inspection procedures and policies. Long-Term Impact of the Mentorship Program In the 2017 assessment, NACCHO asked mentorship participants about the impact of the mentorship program on their retail food protection program since their participation in the program, shown in Figure 4. The results demonstrate that participants in the mentorship program were able to achieve conformance to one or more Retail Program Standards and others continue to progress towards full conformance of one or more Retail Program Standards. Retail Program Standards 2 and 9 were the most popular standards included in participants work plans. The next most popular standard was Retail Program Standard 7, with eight respondents stating that they were able to conform to it. All respondents answered that they either Strongly Agree or Agree that the mentorship program has stimulated quality and performance improvement opportunities within their agencies. Furthermore, participants indicated that the program helped their agencies in better identifying strengths and weaknesses in their retail food program. When asked if the mentorship program [ 4] Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs

FIGURE 4. STANDARDS COMPLETED VS. STANDARDS PARTIALLY COMPLETED/ AWAITING VA SINCE MENTORSHIP PARTICIPATION 11 7 4 3 2 3 3 3 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard Standard Standard 7 Standard Standard 9 Standards completed Standards partially completed or awaiting VA helped their agencies better communicate about the retail food program with their Boards of Health or governing entities, 4% of participants (3) responded that they Strongly Agree or Agree. More than half of participants (24) reported that they Strongly Agree or Agree that the mentorship program helped their agency meet requirements of the Public Health Accreditation Board. All mentees stated that participating in the Mentorship Program has helped their agency achieve or make significant progress on the Retail Program Standards and that NACCHO staff provided helpful guidance, resources, and materials during the program. Over 90% of respondents (3) stated that FDA staff provided helpful guidance, resources, and materials, which also furthered progress during the mentorship program. About half of respondents (23) reported experiencing at least some problems or challenges related to making progress on the Retail Program Standards during the mentorship program, which 70% attributed to competing priorities and limited resources. Other challenges included travel costs and time, incompatible mentor, finding an auditor, lack of leadership support, lack of staff buy-in, state-level issues, NACCHO reimbursement procedures, and issues with their agencies software company. Participation in the mentorship program enabled % of respondents (37) to continue working on the Retail Program Standards after the mentorship program ended. Respondents gave various reasons for why they chose to continue working on the Retail Program Standards after the mentorship program, including the following: The completion of the self-assessment during the mentorship program enabled them to secure FDA grant funding to support work on the Retail Program Standards. The elements of the Retail Program Standards have been permanently interwoven into their food safety program. The work on the Retail Program Standards has been a continuous process to evaluate and improve retail food inspection programs. The mentorship program provided the opportunity to meet others who can serve as resources, which directly supported involvement in the Retail Program Standards. In addition, % of respondents (3) stated that their agency has used resources and contacts from the mentorship program to continue work on the Retail Program Standards. Respondents reported staying connected with the program participants in the following ways: Respondents reached out to peers for resources or guidance on programmatic issues beyond the Retail Program Standards. Impact of the NACCHO Retail Program Standards Mentorship Program on Retail Food Regulatory Programs [ ]

[REPORT] September 2017 Respondents used FoodSHIELD, an online platform that allows public health and food regulatory officials at the local, state, and federal levels across the nation to securely work together to share and borrow resources and conduct verification audits for their peers. Respondents thought the mentorship program encouraged a family tree dynamic with other participants. Participants remain connected with each other and form new connections when new participants join the program. Conclusion The results of the survey and final progress reports from the first five cohorts illustrate that the NACCHO mentorship program has successfully increased local health departments participation in and conformance with the Retail Program Standards. The benefits of the mentorship program extend well beyond the mentorship program period for many of the participants. The program has also met the FDA s goal of strengthening the role of local health departments regulatory programs, which protect retail food in the United States. NACCHO is continuing to partner with the FDA to administer the mentorship program. In the sixth cohort, NACCHO opened the program to all retail food regulatory programs, including the addition of state, territorial, and tribal programs. NACCHO will recruit the seventh cohort in the fall of 2017. References 1. Food and Drug Administration. Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards webpage. Retrieved September, 2017, from https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/retailfoodprotection/ ProgramStandards/default.htm 2. NACCHO. (2017). 201 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Washington, DC: NACCHO. Retrieved September, 2017, from http://nacchoprofilestudy.org/chapter-7/ Acknowledgments This project was made possible through the support of the Food and Drug Administration, cooperative agreement #U0FD00933-02. NACCHO is grateful for this support. The views expressed within do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsor. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Amy Chang, MS Program Analyst, Environmental Health achang@naccho.org Jennifer Li, MHS Senior Director, Environmental Health and Disability jli@naccho.org The mission of the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) is to be a leader, partner, catalyst, and voice with local health departments. 1201 Eye St, NW, 4th Floor Washington, DC 2000 www.naccho.org P 202-73-0 F 202-73-13 2017. National Association of County and City Health Officials.