I. Background Page 1 III. Definitions.. Page 2 II. Policy.. Page 1 IV. Procedural Guidelines. 2Page 3

Similar documents
GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I. BACKGROUND

When used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meanings designated:

CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

Policy 5.18 TRAFFIC CRASHES AND OTHER ROAD HAZARDS

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /14/2014 7/16/2014

Subject DEPARTMENTAL VEHICLE CRASHES. 23 September By Order of the Police Commissioner

MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 10/28/2013

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. General Order Vehicle Pursuits

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 11/24/2013

West s Utah Code Annotated _Title 26. Utah Health Code _Chapter 39. Utah Child Care Licensing Act. U.C.A T. 26, Ch.

I. Background... Page 1 IV. Procedural Guidelines... Page 4 II. Definitions... Page 1 V. Cross References... Page 8 III. Regulations...

Chattanooga Police Department - Policy Manual ADM-42 INSPECTIONS

Effective Date February 27, New Directive. Amends. Replaces: WPD GO 424

I. Background Page 1 II. Policy Page 1 III. Regulations Page 1 IV. Procedures Page 3 V. Cross References Page 5

TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.11 VEHICLE OPERATIONS

Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 12/10/13. To establish procedures for the Atlanta Police Department s Mounted Patrol Unit.

I. Background...Page 1 IV. Regulations...Page 1 II. Policy... Page 1 V. Procedural Guidelines...Page 3 III. Rules Page 1

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

CITY OF OAKLAND AGENDAREPORT

GREENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL. By the Order Of: Mark Holtzman, Chief of Police Date Reissued: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 8

CITY OF OVERLAND PARK POSITION DESCRIPTION

Fort Meade Police Department s One.is too many Officer Traffic Safety Program PROJECT NARRATIVE

POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Charter of the Credit and Risk Committee Danske Bank A/S CVR no

COMPLIANCE PLAN PRACTICE NAME

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: COPY CONTRACTOR, MEDICAL STAFF, REFERRAL SOURCE AND EMPLOYEE SCREENING POLICY

Consolidated City of Jacksonville OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF GENERAL ORDER X.32 (10) RESCINDS: X.31 ( ) SCOPE: CPRS/3

CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE RICHMOND FIRE DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER 01-3

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Missoula Police Department Policy Manual. Firearms

SNOW HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT

THIS ORDER CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED SECTIONS: 2. DEPUTY/COURT SECURITY ACTION (During Use Of Force/No Firearms) page 26

Page 1 of 7 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT PURSUIT AND EMERGENCY DRIVING GENERAL ORDER JAN 2012 ANNUAL

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.4

TYPE OF DIRECTIVE LINE PROCEDURE SUBJECT VEHICULAR PURSUITS REFERENCE G-1, Code of Virginia ,

NGAR REG Operating and Parking Vehicles on State Military Reservations

CHAPTER MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION THERAPY

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA STAFF CLASS SPECIFICATION

CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Courage, Pride, and Dedication

Assessment and Program Dismissal Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Pharmacy Residency Programs

MINNEAPOLIS PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT

Disciplinary Action, Suspension, or Termination

Faculty of Science Local Area Safety and Health (LASH) Committee Rules of Procedure

CITY OF COLUMBIA. Columbia Police Department. Proposed Police Emergency Vehicle Operation and Motor Vehicle Pursuit Policy

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION. LCB File No. R September 7, 2007

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 6.9

Index as: DEPARTMENTAL AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS

Department of State Police General Order

VERIFICATION OF READINESS TO START UP OR RESTART NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Selected Aspects of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program. Department of Transportation

BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND PERFORMANCE AUDIT OCTOBER 2001

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY PROGRAM

BOARD OF FINANCE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Amends: Effective: April 1, 2002 General Order: Title: Motor Vehicle Pursuits

Employee Injury Procedures

Fishers Fire Department. Merit Commission

4-223 BODY WORN CAMERAS (06/29/16) (07/29/17) (B-D) I. PURPOSE

APPENDIX D CHECKLIST FOR PROPOSALS

SPECIAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I. BACKGROUND

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

WARNING: GIVING FALSE INFORMATION AND/OR OMITTING INFORMATION WILL IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY AN APPLICANT

It is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees.

EMTALA Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 18D 1

FIELD TRAINING EVALUATION PROGRAM

D E T R O I T P O L I C E D E PA R T M E N T

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Personal Financial Management for Service Members

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 8.3

ACCIDENT AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM (AIPP)

CHAPTER 6 Construction Traffic Management Program. Overview

Applicable To: Central Records Unit employees, Records Section Communications, and SSD commander. Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 11/18/13

Adult and Community Education Professional Administrative Clerical Computing and Technical (PACCT) Staff Award 1999

Argyle Police Department 2017 Annual Report

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

SECTION 3 PLAN & GUIDEBOOK

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

in Medication-Assisted Treatment College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA Thursday, February 09, 2012 Risk Management and Benzodiazepine Use

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date December 1, 2015

FOLLOW-UP REPORT Denver International Airport Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program

Sarnia Police Service Directory of General Records and Personal Information Banks

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

This policy shall apply to all Municipality of Jasper operations and all Municipality of Jasper employees and volunteers.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

When used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meaning designated:

DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA HANDBOOK Washington, DC May 24, 2007 VOLUNTEER TRANSPORTATION NETWORK (VTN)

YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS THIS NOTICE DESCRIBES YOUR RIGHTS TO FILE AN APPEAL WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP. PLEASE REVIEW IT CAREFULLY.

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 6.16

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER DOWNED AIRPLANES SUBJECT

Egg Harbor Fire Department and First Responders Standard Operating Policy

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1628

PATIENT RIGHTS TO ACCESS PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS California Health & Safety Code Section

II. Definitions... Page 1 V. Cross References... Page 6 III. Regulations... Page 2 VI. Attachments... Page 6

Transcription:

GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Title Crash Review Board (CRB) Topic/Number GO-SPT-401.02 Effective Date April 22, 2002 Related to: General Order 201.07 (Review Boards) Distribution A I. Background Page 1 III. Definitions.. Page 2 II. Policy.. Page 1 IV. Procedural Guidelines. 2Page 3 I. Background Crashes involving departmental vehicles often jeopardize the safety and lives of members and the public. The legal ramifications of these crashes pose a potential liability and financial burden to the Department. The Department has an obligation to its members to provide training, equipment and appropriate guidance in order to prevent vehicle crashes. The Department also has a responsibility to the public to fully investigate, bring resolution to, and hold members accountable for crashes involving negligence or violations of traffic and departmental regulations. (CALEA 26.1.4) The Metropolitan Police Department Crash Review Board (CRB) is created in order to provide command-level review and oversight of all departmental crash cases. II. Policy The policy of the Metropolitan Police Department is to reduce the number of crashes involving departmental vehicles by: A. Providing training, equipment, policy and procedures to maximize effectiveness of members driving abilities. B. Conducting high quality, professional, impartial, timely and fact based assessments of crash cases involving members of the Department. C. Holding operators accountable for the safe operation of departmental vehicles.

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 2of 7 D. Providing consistent application of departmental policies and ensuring that MPD policies and procedures have been followed. E. Seeking to raise internal and external credibility as it relates to police vehicle operation and foster the confidence, trust, and support of the community and members of the Department. F. Identifying training needs and setting new standards in police vehicle operations and accountability. G. Making police vehicle operation policy recommendations that foster safety for police officers and citizens. III. Definitions For the purpose of this order, the following terms shall have these designated meanings: A. Department Vehicles include: 1. Department - owned vehicles; 2. Vehicles rented by the Department and used for Department purposes; 3. Privately owned vehicles authorized to be used for official business; 4. Any other vehicles being officially used for Department purposes. B. Preventable crash- when the member failed to exercise reasonable care in the operation of the Departmental vehicle; failed to take reasonable action which could have avoided or prevented the crash; violated a Department rule, policy or procedure which contributed to the crash; and/or committed moving violation(s) whether cited or not. C. Non-preventable crash- when a member exercised the level of reasonable care and caution that would be exercised by an ordinary and prudent person in the same circumstances as the member, and who took reasonable precautions to prevent or minimize the effect of the crash. D. Serious bodily injury- an injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfiguration, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any limb or organ (this includes broken bones). E. Substantial property damage- total property damage to vehicles or other property resulting from a crash that exceeds three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) in value.

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 3of 7 IV. Procedural Guidelines A. Crash Review Board 1. Members of the CRB shall consist of: a. An Operations Commander (Chairman), b. Deputy Director, Corporate Support, c. Deputy Director, Institute of Police Science, d. Commander, Major Crash Unit, and e. Manager, Fleet Services Department. 2. The Executive Assistant Chief (EAC) shall schedule the rotating Operations Commander to serve as CRB Chairman quarterly. 3. The Crash Review Officer assigned to the Fleet Services Department shall serve as the CRB Recorder. The assigned member shall ensure that all related reports and available evidentiary information is available for the CRB s review. 4. As a part of their investigation, Commanding Officers shall submit a full report of all crash cases to include: a. Findings as to the cause of the crash, b. Responsible party, c. Contributing and mitigating factors, d. Whether operation of the vehicle was within Departmental policies and guidelines, e. The specific traffic regulations or Departmental policies violated, and f. A recommendation whether the crash was preventable or nonpreventable. 5. In no case shall a Commanding Officer institute any type of corrective or disciplinary action prior to final action by the CRB. (CALEA 26.1.5)

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 4of 7 6. The CRB shall meet monthly, on the 3 rd Wednesday of each month, to review cases from the previous calendar month. 7. A quorum shall consist of three (3) CRB members. 8. The CRB shall prepare a final report, documenting CRB s findings and recommendations, no later than ten (10) business days from the conclusion of the CRB s review. The report shall be forwarded through channels to the command that reported and investigated the crash case. 9. A majority vote must determine the CRB s final decision. If a majority vote cannot be obtained after discussion and votes, the Chairman makes the final decision. The dissenting member(s), if any, may submit a minority report addressing their findings with recommendations. 10. The CRB, when determining responsibility and making recommendations, shall consider, but are not limited to, the following: a. The extent and scope of driver training given to the member; b. The manner in which the vehicle was being operated, to include code one, routine patrol, etc.; c. The existence and extent of negligence on the part of the Department operator, including a determination whether the crash was the result of faulty driving, reckless driving or driving in clear disregard of Departmental orders or traffic regulations; d. Deficiencies on the part of supervisory personnel; e. Operating conditions of the vehicle; f. Adequacy of vehicle maintenance; g. Adequacy of location of installed equipment; and h. Identification of operational policy issues. 11. The CRB has the authority to render the following actions: a. Remand a case back to the Commanding Officer for further investigation,

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 5of 7 b. Rule whether a report is to be classified as preventable or non-preventable, and c. In preventable cases, where negligence or violation of traffic and/or departmental guidelines occurred, make a recommendation for corrective action or adverse action. 12. To establish a degree of continuity throughout the Department, the CRB shall utilize a Point Value System to determine the appropriate penalty for all preventable accidents. The point value system considers the circumstances contributing to the crash and the severity of the crash. (CALEA 26.1.4.c) a. Point assessments are based upon the following criteria: 1) One (1) point if the operator violated Departmental orders and guidelines that were a primary or secondary factor in the crash. 2) One (1) point if the operator committed a moving traffic violation that was a primary or secondary factor in the crash, whether cited or not. b. Additional points are assessed based upon the severity of the crash as follows: 1) One (1) point if the crash resulted in injury to any party less than serious bodily injury, to include complaints of pain or injury, without any visible injury. 2) Three (3) points if the crash resulted in serious bodily injury or death. 3) One (1) point if the crash resulted in property damage less than substantial property damage. 4) Three (3) points if the crash resulted in substantial property damage or renders a vehicle a total loss. c. The CRB calculates the total point assessment for the member when considering the penalty for preventable accidents. The total is derived by adding the point assessment for the crash case under review and the point assessment for all preventable crashes the member was charged with during the preceding twenty-four (24) months.

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 6of 7 d. Based upon the member s cumulative point assessment total, the CRB shall recommend disciplinary action as follows: 1) Less than four (4) points corrective action 2) Four (4) points or more adverse action 13. The CRB shall forward all recommendations for corrective action through channels to the respective command. The decision on the level of corrective action shall rest with the individual Commanding Officer. However, Commanding Officers shall supply the CRB with a copy of the corrective action taken. (CALEA 26.1.5) 14. The CRB shall make recommendations for adverse action to the Department Discipline Review Officer (DDRO). (CALEA 26.1.5) 15. The CRB shall forward copies of all preventable crash cases and other training recommendations to the Director of the Maurice T. Turner Jr. Institute of Police Science (IPS). 16. IPS shall be responsible for determining the appropriate level of driver re-certification or remedial training; the scheduling of members for training; and maintaining corresponding training records. (CALEA 26.1.4.a; 33.1.5; and 33.1.6) B. The CRB Recorder shall be responsible for: a. Scheduling Board Meetings; b. Notifying members of the Board of the date, time, and location of Board Meetings; c. Attending all CRB meetings; d. Assessing and reviewing all documents required by the CRB for completeness; e. Assigning a case tracking number for each case reviewed by the CRB; f. Obtaining prior crash report information on involved members for the CRB s consideration; g. Providing all pertinent reports, records, and samples to be considered, as well as all administrative and/or clerical assistance;

Crash Review Board (CRB) (GO-SPT-401.02) 7of 7 h. Preparing a summary sheet of the CRB s findings and recommendations for each case reviewed by the Board; i. Notifying members and their Commanding Officer of the CRB s findings and recommendations; j. Maintaining a computerized database containing statistical information concerning all crash reports; and k. Maintaining a complete file of the CRB records. CHR:NMJ:mcw // SIGNED // Charles H. Ramsey Chief of Police