NEPA Delegation: New Directions for TxDOT

Similar documents
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures for Environmental Documents

MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

Agency Agency Comments Received Response to Comments American Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA)

FOR REINVESTMENT ACT. NILAH DEVANEY NWRO, AWARDING OFFICIAL

Using Partnerships to Improve Delivery of Programs in VDOT

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ON-THE-JOB TRAINING AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES (OJT/SS) PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES LLANO COUNTY

AWARDING FIXED OBLIGATION GRANTS TO NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

The FAST Act: New Department of Transportation Tribal Self-Governance Program and Tribal Transportation Provisions

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INSPECT, SAMPLE, AND TEST FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL AND MONITOR ABATEMENT PROJECTS PUBLICATION

Procedures for Local Public Agency Project Administration (Revised 5/2014)

TxDOT Statewide 2017 TA Set-Aside Questions & Answers

City of Malibu Request for Proposal

Maintaining Project Consistency throughout the Project Development Process

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 39 Environmental Review of Transportation Projects

Special Approval per TAC Part A - LG Qualifications Statement (Local Government Agency management of project development process elements)

Division A Federal Aid Highways And Highway Safety Construction Programs

FY 2017 Title VI/Nondiscrimination Plan

2900 Mulberry Ave Muscatine, Iowa (563) Request for Proposal (RFP) Professional Architecture / Engineering Services

Archeological Sites and Cemeteries

Business Plan Grant Program. Application/Rules

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Phone# (928)

Planning Resources - Tribal. Kenneth Petty

Nevada Department of Transportation Traffic Operations Policy Memorandum Traffic Signal Warrant Approval Process

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the DUBUQUE Metropolitan Planning Area; and

THE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Concession Operations for Concession Stand at JOHNSTON HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC COMPLEX

ARRA Overview. ATTWG Symposium Anchorage, AK April 7, 2009

Tribal Transportation Program Delivery Guide

CMS Ignored Congressional Intent in Implementing New Clinical Lab Payment System Under PAMA, ACLA Charges in Suit

Measuring and Improving Locally Administered Projects Performance. Robert Guercia, VDOT Russ Dudley, VDOT Lorenzo Casanova, FHWA October 24, 2012

Overview of the New EDGAR (formerly the Uniform Grants Guidance)

Module 3 Advance Funding Agreements between the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and a Local Government (LG) for Transportation Projects

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

CONTRACTORS SAFETY PROCEDURES Health and Safety Procedures Overview. Safety is a high priority of the Chinook s Edge School Division No. 73.

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CSJ: PASS-THROUGH FINANCE PROJECT

DALLAS HORSESHOE PROJECT RFQ Q & A MATRIX #6. (February 14, 2012)

General guidance regarding common compliance issues Child Care Payments Compliance

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District

Application for registration of food business

Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014

TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) SET ASIDE PROGRAM July 2016

Agency for Health Care Administration

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

A High Level Overview of West Virginia State Procurement

JOINT PROCESS REVIEW OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTERED FEDERAL-AID PROGRAM

City of Jacksonville, Alabama Public Square Overlay District. Façade Improvement Program APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT

NEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

TIER 1 CUT OFF GUIDELINES (7/30/12)

Expediting Project Delivery Webinar - Streamlining Decision Making in Project Delivery

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR. Document Management System for a Tribal Governmental Organization PROPOSAL NO. FY2012/041

Projects from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Enacted February 17, 2009

Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance

Guidance. Historical Studies Review Procedures

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Employee Telework Screening Survey

T E X A S D E P A RT M E N T O F T R A N S P O RT AT I O N TITLE VI IMPLEMENTING PLAN

TxDOT Internal Audit Local Government Project Oversight Function ( ) Department-wide Report

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS

SA CONNECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) SCOPE OF SERVICES

Update on the 2007 Disparity Study February 2011

Section Q. Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting

Arizona Tribal Transportation Partnership Steering Committee Meeting Notes

Best-Value Procurement Manual. MnDOT Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting (OCIC)

LIBRARY COOPERATIVE GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND [Governing Body] for and on behalf of [grantee]

Chesapeake Bay Restoration Strategy FAQs

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

Iowa DOT Update 2016 APWA Fall Conference JOHN E. DOSTART, P.E.

Per the requirements of ARRA, all. themselves before asking any question in order to have themselves and the question/answer shown on

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Program

Legal Advertisement County of Benzie REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

American Honda Foundation

TRANSPORTATION 2050 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Call in number: Passcode:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: SAN EXPANSION & OPTIMIZATION

WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has been asked to participate in consultation for and to be an invited signatory to this Programmatic Agreement (PA); and

WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA MPO EXPLAINED

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

CITY OF LYNWOOD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For BUSINESS LICENSE SERVICES

County Transportation Infrastructure Fund Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions

MEMORANDUM July 17, 2017

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

Apologies Michael, but lets work off of the attached update version. James Bass came back with a few additional minor tweaks to the language.

Strategic Projects Division

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For East Bay Community Energy Technical Energy Evaluation Services

NYC Agency Safe Handling Program for Universal & Electronic Waste

PUBLIC MEETING. For I-10 East, I-410 to Loop 1604

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Welcome to the Public Meeting for the State Highway 68 Project. SH 68 Project Office Information Environmental Constraints & Study Corridors

Transcription:

TxDOT Short Course October 16, 2013 NEPA Delegation: New Directions for TxDOT Cindy Adams, HDR

What is NEPA Delegation? Formal Assignment of responsibilities from Federal to State Government Assignment occurs through MOU, based on State application MOU: Officially approves State s application Identifies FHWA s and State s roles and responsibilities Defines Assignment requirements

Path to Entering Assignment Program Many elements involved: Waive sovereign immunity Identify desired scope Prepare application Adjust organization, as appropriate Negotiate MOU Develop policy, procedure, tools, checklists Train staff

Scope of Assignment Tremendous flexibility offered, from specific projects to the entire federal-aid highway program Texas poised to request broad responsibilities all projects on and off State Highway System Excluding specific projects requested by District Engineers and projects not eligible for assumption FHWA retains discretion on what to assign: it may withhold assignment of specific projects or responsibilities

Application Completing Application a top priority Application identifies Scope of program requested for Assignment Current & Proposed Organization Current & Proposed Procedures, Tools Roles and responsibilities Training Resources for program Application contents represent TxDOT s commitments to the program

Goals of NEPA Assignment Streamline environmental process Save time in project delivery Continue to meet stringent federal environmental protection standards Show TxDOT s leadership in transportation delivery

All Environmental Laws, Regulations, and Policies Remain The Same But TxDOT, not FHWA, will be legally responsible to ensure compliance Can be sued in Federal court State Highway System NEPA documents Local Roadway NEPA documents TxDOT required to comply with all FHWA NEPA regulations, policies, and formal guidance Streamlining comes from eliminating review layer, not from shortcutting legal requirements Penalty for not following requirements ranges from loss of federal funding for specific project to loss of NEPA Assignment

FHWA Keeps These Responsibilities Engineering decisions Air quality conformity determinations Government to government consultation with tribes US DOT responsibilities for statewide and metropolitan planning Multi-modal projects, unless requested through separate application

And Changes Roles Moving from project to program-level responsibilities, providing: Training support Technical assistance and policy interpretation Assignment Program audits Twice yearly for the first two years; once a year thereafter Process and Program reviews

Checks and Balances TxDOT must comply with all FHWA NEPA regulations, policies, and formal guidance Agencies & public will have opportunity to comment on application TxDOT will be solely responsible & solely liable for the responsibilities it assumes, and will defend all claims in Federal court FHWA will audit program including how well TxDOT meets specified performance measures U.S. Secretary of Transportation will submit annual reports to Congress

Key MOU Requirements TxDOT will maintain its project files, including for local roadway projects, and make them available for FHWA inspection with 5 days notice TxDOT will carry out regular QA and QC to ensure it is meeting the requirements of law and MOU TxDOT will maintain adequate organization and staff capability to effectively carry out NEPA Assignment TxDOT will report quarterly to FHWA on its approvals and decisions

More MOU Requirements FHWA will provide no project-level assistance TxDOT will perform self-assessments at least every 6 months Determine if its processes are working properly, identify weaknesses, and take corrective action TxDOT to provide a summary of the selfassessment to FHWA FHWA will reassume authority for any project it determines TxDOT is out of compliance with MOU

Audit Issues TxDOT will need to effectively document its decisions For audit purposes, If it s not documented, it didn t happen Quality of record keeping this may be difficult adjustment for some staff TxDOT will need to demonstrate it has followed its own required procedures as well as FHWA requirements

Audit Lessons Learned FHWA acutely focused on the details of identified procedures Files must be kept in good order following requirements Must follow the letter of QC requirements and document review procedures for compliant findings No environmental document may be signed until all reviews are completed & documented

NEPA Assignment Benefits More efficient environmental review process Timesaving will result from eliminating one layer of government review Improved timeframe for project letting Streamlines consultation processes by Allowing direct formal consultation between TxDOT and federal resource agencies Reducing consultation parties from three to two, making consultation more efficient Increased focus on local decision-making Opportunity to be in forefront of new approach

Assignment Program Risks TxDOT will take on legal liability for decisions TxDOT attorneys will defend actions & decisions in Federal court For project both on and off State highway system No more FHWA backstop ; black hat Can be politically difficult to make right decision Penalty for poor performance ranges from Deficient findings in Federal Register to loss of assignment program

Assignment Program Creates New Model Change from end-check to built-in quality TxDOT and FHWA agree on program standards Established in Application and MOU TxDOT performs work, prepares and approves environmental documents Environmental documents conform to mutually established standards and expectations FHWA audits program to ensure it meets requirements & is generally successful

Program Success TxDOT will develop a successful program, based on Skilled & dedicated environmental staff 40+ years of preparing NEPA documents for FHWA Careful quality control Tools, guidance, & staff support Commitment to training, & to sharing best practices between Districts Learning from audits and self-assessments

We Need your Help Need ideas and input from Districts in developing the program and its procedures Need your support in following procedures that are established