ASTHO s Radiation Partnership Portfolio Update

Similar documents
David Jansen PE, LEED AP Director, Office of Radiation Protection Washington State Department of Health

Lessons Learned from Local Radiation Shelter Exercises and Resources to Help Advance Radiation Preparedness Within Local Jurisdictions

BIOTERRORISM AND PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE: A NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE TRAINING PLAN

2011 FDA SOUTHEAST REGION ANNUAL SEMINAR. 11/09/11 Karen Smallwood, RRHR

Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex

To obtain a copy of the report, please contact Tarajee Knight at the CSTE National Office: or

Medical Response Coordination Following an IND Detonation

Patient Movement Following a Radiological Mass Casualty Incident

WHO's response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident (2012) Seminar on the recovery and reconstruction of Fukushima, 3 September 2014, Geneva

Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Radiation Crisis: A National Review of the U.S. Domestic Public Health and Medical Response

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) TERRORISM RESPONSE ANNEX

Medical Response Planning for Radiological and Nuclear Events: the Overview

NUCLEAR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES

National Commission on Children and Disasters 2010 Report to the President and Congress August 23, Report Publication Date: October 2010

HPP-PHEP Cooperative Agreement CDC-RFA-TP

NYC Radiological Planning

ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Attention on public health preparedness has increased

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 Section-by-Section Summary

AREN T WE READY YET? CLOSING THE PLANNING, RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY GAPS FOR RADIOLOGICAL TERRORISM

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Homeland Security Recommendations Related to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Public Health Chemical Emergency Response Plan. Michael L. Holcomb, Ph.D. Public Health Toxicologist, State of Oregon

Nuclear Disaster Guidelines. for Preparedness, Response and Recovery. (Version: March 31, 2016) (English Translation)

Worker Safety and Health Support Annex. Coordinating Agency: Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH)

Module NC-1030: ESF #8 Roles and Responsibilities

Certified Hazard Control Manager (CHCM) Certified Hazard Control Manager Security (CHCM-SEC) Examination Blueprint/Outline

MEDICAL SURGE. Public Health and Medical System Planning to Promote Effective Response. Nora O Brien, MPA, CEM Connect Consulting Services

RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (REPP)

Emergency Preparedness Near Nuclear Power Plants

February 24, TRAIN Learning Network: Managing, Sharing, Disseminating Public Health Training Content for Today s Workforce

Nuclear Plant Emergency Response

Nuclear Plant Emergency Response

Mississippi Worker Safety and Health Support Annex

PEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 8 PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL

Communication Toolkit. Promoting the Impact and Importance of the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Program

Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreements (CDC) Hospital Preparedness Program (ASPR - PHSSEF) FY 2017 Labor HHS Appropriations Bill

Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) ANNEX 1 OF THE KNOX COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Dr. Gerald Parker Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Office for Public Health Emergency Preparedness

Public Health s Role in Healthcare Coalitions

Report on the CDC-CRCPD Roundtable on Communication and Teamwork: Keys to Successful Radiological Response

National Public Health Performance Standards. Local Assessment Instrument

ANNEX Q HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Chapter 1 - History and Current Status of Emergency Management

Details of Study Report 1 1 Introduction 2 International Emergency Response Systems 3 Present Situation and Approach in East Asia 4 Conclusion

ANNEX 8 ESF-8- HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

About the Association of State & Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO)

CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR and EXPLOSIVE (CBRNE) PLAN

Public Health Preparedness. Presentation to the Emergency Management Standing Oversight Committee January, 2014

Terrorism Consequence Management

San Francisco Bay Area

Radiological Consequence Management

Technical Volume 3 Emergency preparedness and response

Emergency Scenarios. National Response Plan. Example: Goiânia, Brazil September Goiânia Radiological Accident. Goiânia Public Health Impacts

ESF 10 - Oil and Hazardous Materials

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY REORGANIZATION PLAN November 25, 2002

CDC Tools for Radiological Preparedness & Response

Regional Patient Tracking Concept of Operations Version 2, October 2016

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REQUIREMENTS Long Term Care Facility Overview

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TECHNICAL SERVICES CATALOGUE

WM 07 Conference, February 25 March 1, 2007, Tucson, AZ. Response to a Transportation Accident Involving Radioactive Material Simplified

Improving Preparedness For Radiological Transportation Events Through Exercises

MEDICAL-TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: BIOLOGICAL/INFECTIOUS DISEASE

ANNEX 8 ESF-8- HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES. SC Department of Health and Environmental Control

A Program in. Occupational and Environmental Health & Safety. Emergency Planning: Terrorism, Security, and Communication. July 25 29, 2016 Boston, MA

EMS Subspecialty Certification Review Course. Mass Casualty Management (4.1.3) Question 8/14/ Mass Casualty Management

Model City Emergency Operations Plan and Terrorism Annex

1. What services do your healthcare coalitions provide to its members?

Building Community Resilience to Disaster: Lessons Learned from Community-based Initiatives. Malcolm Williams, PhD, MPP March 18, 2014

MAHONING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH MAHONING COUNTY YOUNGSTOWN CITY HEALTH DISTRICT

Central Maine Regional Health Care Coalition BYLAWS

Planning for Specific Hazards: Bolstering Health Center Staff Readiness for an Outbreak Kristine Gonnella, MPH

Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex. Coordinating Agencies: Cooperating Agencies:

CONTENTS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE: MODEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR STATE LONG- TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAMS

If you have any questions or comments regarding the following Public Health Emergency Response Plan, please contact:

Mass Transportation/Evacuation Tabletop Exercise August 21, 2013

Public Health Infrastructure in the United States: An Integrated System

Mississippi Support Function #8- Public Health and Medical Services Annex

Chemical Terrorism Preparedness In the Nation s State Public Health Laboratories

Draft 11/3/2017. Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Public Health Emergency Preparedness Hospital Emergency Preparedness

Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Requirements (Mandates)

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 375-X-2 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ASSISTANT DIRECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATIONAL RESPONSE PLAN

Operational Plan in Support of the Finger Lakes Public Health Alliance Intermunicipal Agreement Between the Counties of Chemung, Livingston, Monroe,

Rethinking Nuclear Disaster Response Planning: The Nuc/Rad Incident & Exercise Planner

The National Preparedness System (NPS) Moving Preparedness into a Net Centric Environment

Kanawha Putnam Emergency Management Plan Functional Annex. (completed by plan authors) Local / County Office of Emergency Management

PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE PREPAREDNESS STRATEGIC PROGRAMMATIC PLAN,

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response

NHSPI v.1.0 Project Briefing & Launch Plan 2013 ASTHO Annual Meeting

Federal Funding for Homeland Security. B Border and transportation security Encompasses airline

Unit 7. Federal Assistance for Mass Fatalities Incidents. Visual 7.1 Mass Fatality Incident Response

Regulatory,Quality & Emergency Preparedness. MaryBeth Parache Director, Quality Affairs New York Blood Center

ANNEX D RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

Emergency Management Plan

55 th IAEA General Conference IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Programme Monday 19 September Friday 23 September 2011

Are the conclusions of the IAEA Fukushima Daiichi report of relevance in a Nordic context?

Chatham County EMERGENCY OPERATIONS Plan INCIDENT ANNEX G RADIOLOGICAL

DOD INSTRUCTION DOD PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES

Response to Fukushima NPP Accident - Medical Response in Korea -

Transcription:

ASTHO s Radiation Partnership Portfolio Update HEATHER MISNER, MPP DIRECTOR, PREPAREDNESS AND CLINICAL OUTREACH ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS

NARR Overview

National Alliance for Radiation Readiness (NARR) A coalition of organizations committed to improving the nation s ability to prepare, respond, and recover from radiological emergencies at the local, state, and national levels. o 18 Member Agencies o 10 Federal Partners o Administered by the ASTHO through a cooperative agreement with the CDC, National Center for Environmental Health, Radiation Studies Branch

NARR Membership American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) American Hospital Association (AHA) American Medical Association (AMA) American Public Health Association (APHA) Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH) Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Health Physics Society (HPS) International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) National Disaster Life Support Foundation (NDSLF) National Emergency Management Association (NEMA) National Public Health Information Coalition (NPHIC) Radiation Injury Treatment Network (RITN) Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health (SDMPH)

Federal Partner Agencies Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response/US Department of Health and Human Services (ASPR/HHS) US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) US Department of Energy (DOE) US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Purpose To serve as the collective voice of health in radiological preparedness through the: o Participation in national dialogue o Provision of thoughtful feedback on policies and guidelines o Convening of partners to raise awareness and resolve emergency issues To build radiological emergency preparedness, response and recovery capacity and capabilities

NARR Clearinghouse www.radiationready.org Forum for sharing resources, tools, and best practices related to radiation planning, response, recovery

Interactive Webinars Poison Control Center Collaborations with Public Health Communicating with the Public in a Radiation Disaster NYS Clinical Data Management System: Use for Medical Countermeasure Response and Population Management Radiological Emergency Preparedness and Hostile Action Based Exercises: Federal, State, and Local Perspectives

Fukushima After Action Report

Fukushima After Action Report Review of the US public health and medical response to domestic concerns arising from the 2010 incident at the Japanese Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant AAR identifies: o Key strengths o Background environmental data included nuclear power plants o HHS Regions IX and X immediately convened calls that included federal, state, local, and tribal representatives o Collaborative development of passenger screening guidelines o Shortcomings o Lessons learned o Opportunities for improvement

Traveler Screening Guidance

Passenger Screening Tabletop Exercise Purpose Identify key activities associated with passenger screening at an airport following an radiological exposure in another country Validate and identify opportunities for improvement in the passenger screening protocols developed following the Fukushima Daiichi incident of 2011. Goal Enhance preparedness of federal, state, and local responders responsible for coordinating and conducting passenger screening at US airports following a radiological release

Tabletop Exercise Objectives Understand and/or identify state and local response requirements Clarify response roles and communication channels How the Epidemiological Assessment form can inform next steps Identify key topics for public information releases Identify information to distribute to passengers and those potentially exposed at the airport

Exercise Strengths Partnership numerous response agencies that worked well together Knowledge clear understanding of the issues surrounding radiation emergencies Open Dialogue existed between federal, state, and local responding agencies

Traveler Screening Guidance Workgroups Formation of 4 work groups Communications Screening and Epidemiological Assessment Bioassay Guidance Emergency Management Role Participants included NARR members, DPHP, State epidemiologists, Laboratory personnel, and Public information officers

Traveler Screening Guidance Present an introduction to screening travelers arriving at U.S. ports of entry (POE) who may be contaminated with or exposed to radioactive material following an international radiological incident Be used by state, local, and tribal public health professionals as part of their existing jurisdictional emergency operations plans and procedures during traveler screening activities Provide information that is intended to bolster, not replace existing plans

Traveler Screening Guidance Divided into sections that walk the planner/responder through the traveler screening process beginning with consent and registration and ending with the (optional) development of a long term registry

Purpose of TS Guidance Provide state, local and tribal planners with guidance on how to: Screen, decontaminate, or provide medical follow up and long term health follow up for travelers, staff at U.S. international POE, and others with contamination or exposure. Communicate information and risk effectively with travelers, who may need: Urgent medical referral Decontamination, or Reassurance that they are not contaminated or exposed Collect and use contamination, exposure, and epidemiologic data to provide situational awareness and to determine post incident public health impacts of the radiologic incident.

Planning Assumptions International radiological incident results in potentially exposed and/or contaminated travelers arriving at U.S. international POE. Radiological incident known situation, not a covert attack. Arriving travelers may or may not have been screened for radiological exposure and/or contamination prior to departing where the incident occurred. Response is scalable to the size of the incident. May be a need to screen a large number of people, even though only a small percentage may be found to be exposed and/or contaminated.

Planning Assumptions Traveler screening occurs once travelers have been cleared by customs and immigration. If decontamination is deemed necessary, external decontamination will be performed at the POE. Local and state government will be responsible for conducting traveler screening and management. CDC Quarantine Stations located at some international airports will assist in the traveler screening and management process. Federal aid and resources may not be available immediately.

Appendices Included Planning and Response Stakeholder Organizations Consent/Adolescent Assent/Parent Permission Form Traveler Screening Tracking and Epidemiologic Assessment Data Collection Form

Appendices Included Radiation Injury Treatment Network Centers Communication Templates Guidance Development Workgroup Members Resources

Next Steps Editorial review at ASTHO Layout and design Guidance will be posted online at www.radiationready.org

RITN Radiation Awareness Project Joint project completed October 2016 Surveyed over 200 preparedness, radiation control, and emergency management professionals Research questions: To what extent are preparedness coordinators across the country are involved in preparedness planning activities for potential radiation emergencies? What capabilities do public health preparedness coordinators possess nationally with respect to radiation preparedness? What level of awareness and interaction do state and local public health preparedness coordinators have with RITN and NDMS?

The Radiation Injury Treatment Network (RITN) is a group of voluntary hospitals focused on preparing to respond to a large scale radiological incident that results in casualties with acute radiation syndrome, that occurs distant to their location. RITN comprises of medical centers with expertise in the management of bone marrow failure, stem cell donor centers and umbilical cord blood banks across the US. RITN is preparing to Accept casualties from a distant incident Provide supportive care for casualties with marrow toxic injuries Provide treatment expertise to practitioners caring for casualties at other locations Collect data on casualties treated at their treatment facility Facilitate marrow transplantation for the small percentage of casualties who require hematopoietic stem cell transplantation RITN Overview Presentation www.ritn.net

Project Objectives To address areas for improvement in radiation emergency preparedness at state and local health departments across the United States by: Increasing the understanding of the preparedness coordinators awareness of radiation emergency concerns nationally; Enhancing the understanding of the radiation emergency response capabilities of preparedness coordinators and available planning activities; Expanding the level of awareness and interaction of preparedness coordinators with the RITN and NDMS.

Survey Responses NACCHO Survey Participation by State ASTHO Survey Participation by State

Awareness of Medical Evacuation Not at all knowledgeable Not very knowledgeable Somewhat knowledgeable Very knowledgeable KNOWLEDGE LEVEL 1.7% 20.7% 65.5% 12.1% PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPANTS

Types of Radiation Plans Sheltering of evacuees Community reception centers Medical countermeasure distribution Ingestion pathway Messaging templates Separate screening/decon from reception center Medical evacuation outside jurisdiction Animal/pet decontamination RITN coordination 42.6% 35.2% 33.3% 24.1% 72.2% 66.7% 64.8% 63.0% 57.4% Other None 3.3% 9.3% Don't know 20.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of jurisdictions

Training Completed in Last 24 Months Community Reception Centers 60.0% Sheltering of Evacuees 53.3% Ingestion Pathway 36.7% Medical Countermeasure Distribution 33.3% Capability Other Animal/Pet Decontamination 20.0% 23.3% Radiation Injury Treatment Network (RITN) 6.7% None 3.3% Don t know 13.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of jurisdictions

Familiarity with RITN

For the current list of RITN centers, please see the RITN website at www. ritn.net/about

Participation in RITN Exercise

Overall Radiation Preparedness Awareness Radiation Preparedness Awareness

Findings and Recommendations Survey findings highlight gaps in radiation planning and spotty awareness even within the same health department Major challenges include funding, resources, information flow, and time Proximity to nuclear facility affects priority ranking

Thank you! HMISNER@ASTHO.ORG