Database Profiles for the ACT Index Driving social change and quality improvement

Similar documents
HOSPICE IN MINNESOTA: A RURAL PROFILE

Hospice CAHPS Analysis for Performance Improvement

National Hospice and Palliative Care OrganizatioN. Facts AND Figures. Hospice Care in America. NHPCO Facts & Figures edition

Please answer the survey questions about the care the patient received from this hospice: [NAME OF HOSPICE]

Overview HOSPICE QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM (HQRP) 10/10/2016

Community Performance Report

Patient Experience & Satisfaction

PO Box 350 Willimantic, Connecticut (860) Connecticut Ave, NW Suite 709 Washington, DC (202)

Palmetto GBA Hospice Coalition Questions August 7, 2001

July 2, 2010 Hospital Compare: New ED and Outpatient. Information; Annual Update to Readmission and Mortality Rates

Palliative Care in the Skilled Nursing Facility Setting: Opportunities Abound

Organization and administration of services

CAHPS Hospice Survey Podcast for Hospices Transcript Data Hospices Must Provide to their Survey Vendor

Introduction to Patient Experience Surveys

Patient Reference Guide. Palliative Care. Care for Adults

Advanced Illness Management Leveraging Person Centered Care and Reengineering the Care Team Across the Continuum

Institutional Handbook of Operating Procedures Policy

End of Life Care. LONDON: The Stationery Office Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 24 November 2008

What is palliative care?

Common Questions Asked by Patients Seeking Hospice Care

Welcome to the Richmond Integrated Hospice Palliative Care Program

Overview of Presentation

QUALITY MEASURES WHAT S ON THE HORIZON

Hospice Care for anyone considering hospice

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Wow ADVANCE CARE PLANNING The continued Frontier. Kathryn Borgenicht, M.D. Linda Bierbach, CNP

08-16 FORM CMS

Hospice Care for the Person with Cancer

Thinking Ahead. My Way, My Choice, My Life at the End. Dignity. Choice Peace. Trust. Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services

The Medicare Hospice Benefit. What Does It Mean to You and Your Patients?

Advance Directive for Health Care


Using An APCD to Inform Healthcare Policy, Strategy, and Consumer Choice. Maine s Experience

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF PALLIATIVE CARE IN MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGS. Dawn Chaitram BSW, RSW, MA Psychosocial Specialist

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

1A) National-level Data Examples: Free or Inexpensive NHANES - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). .

NURSING FACILITIES: FRIENDS OR FOES? Marie C. Berliner Joy & Young, LLP Austin, Texas (512)

Regional Hospice Palliative Care Model Action Plan

Outside the Box: A. Social Service Model of Community-based Palliative Care. Seniors At Home A division of Jewish Family and Children s Services

Caring for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illnesses: Changing Medical Practice and Patient Expectations. Aetna s Compassionate Care SM Program

Providing Hospice Care in a SNF/NF or ICF/IID facility

Cleveland Clinic Implementing Value-Based Care

Best Practices. SNP Alliance. October 2013 Commonwealth Care Alliance: Best Practices in Care for Frail and Disabled Medicare Medicaid Enrollees

Your Right to Self-Determination

Talking to Your Doctor About Hospice Care

Performance Scorecard 2013

Ready Today for The Future of Health Care and Optimal Hospice Care

ILLINOIS Advance Directive Planning for Important Health Care Decisions

Hospice 101. Janet Montgomery, BSN, MBA Chief Marketing Officer, Hospice of Cincinnati

End of Life Terminology The definitions below applies within the province of Ontario, terms may be used or defined differently in other provinces.

Digital Transformation of MOLST: Getting Started and Ensuring Sustainability

Building a Person-Centered ADVANCE CARE Planning Program. Barbara J. Smith, LBSW, MS, CHC, NHA Carolyn Stramecki, MHSA, CPHQ

Definitions/Glossary of Terms

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

CMS DATA FOR THE PUBLIC What We Intend To Do About It! Stephen Sibbitt, MD, FACP Chief Medical Officer Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Produced by The Kidney Foundation of Canada

Partnering with Hospice: Reducing Skilled Nursing Facility to Hospital Readmissions

Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) MBQIP Educational Session One Phase Two, January 2013

Chapter 4 Health and Illness

Understanding the Palliative Care Needs of Older Adults & Their Family Caregivers

Project Description: Page Memorial Hospital (PMH) identified a need for patient care coordination and continuity for post discharge care.

Cynthia Ann LaSala, MS, RN Nursing Practice Specialist Phillips 20 Medicine Advisor, Patient Care Services Ethics in Clinical Practice Committee

Our comments focus on the following components of the proposed rule: - Site Neutral Payments,

Spirituality Is Not A Luxury, It s A Necessity

CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates

Palliative and End-of-Life Care

RESPITE CARE LEGACY HOSPICE

TRANSITIONS OF CARE: INCREASING PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION ACROSS HEALTH CARE SETTINGS

Advance Care Planning: Goals of Care - Calgary Zone

OBJECTIVES DISCLOSURES PURPOSE THE GIANT LEAP FORWARD: CARE PROVIDER TO CARE MANAGER CARE PROVIDER AND CARE MANAGER

A Fresh Look at the Professional Consensus on the Ethics of End of Life Care What Good Can Ethics Guidelines Do?

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

DISCLOSURES PURPOSE THE GIANT LEAP FORWARD: CARE PROVIDER TO CARE MANAGER

Variables that impact the cost of delivering SB 1004 palliative care services. Kathleen Kerr, BA Kerr Healthcare Analytics September 28, 2017

Federal Policy Agenda / 2016 & Beyond

POLST: What s New and How Can We Do Better? Pam Hiransomboon-Vogel, DNP, FNP-BC, ACHPN

Talking to Your Family About End-of-Life Care

For More Information

AGENDA. QUANTIFYING THE THREATS & OPPORTUNITIES UNDER HEALTHCARE REFORM NAHC Annual Meeting Phoenix AZ October 21, /21/2014

Overview of the Hospice Proposed Rule

snapshot Improving Experience of Care Scores Alone is NOT the Answer: Hospitals Need a Patient-Centric Foundation

Navigating the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

HCAHPS: Background and Significance Evidenced Based Recommendations

from disparate data to informed strategies using technology to transform quality, costs, and the patient experience

Patient Experience Survey Results

TEAMBUILDING CREATING A POSITIVE CULTURE IN HOSPICE CARE

End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium

NQF s Contributions to the Nation s Health

Chapter 2. Advance Care Planning

VJ Periyakoil Productions presents

From SAS Programming with Medicare Administrative Data. Full book available for purchase here.

March 14, The Honorable Tom Price Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201

1/8/2018. Chapter 55. End-of-Life Care

Calder Health Centre Emergency Department and Out Patient Experience October to December 2013

(f) Department means the New Hampshire department of health and human services.

Deborah Austin, Director, Patient Relations/Accreditation John Muir Health February 19, 2014

Wellness along the Cancer Journey: Palliative Care Revised October 2015

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

Transcription:

Database Profiles for the ACT Index Driving social change and quality improvement

2 Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice A coalition of funders led by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, including the WellPoint Foundation, the United Health Foundation, the California HealthCare Foundation, and the Charles H. Hood Foundation The Dartmouth Atlas What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Medicare Claims Data all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99 Policymakers, the media, health care analysts and others to improve Who is the database intended for? their understanding of the efficiency and effectiveness of our health care system What part of the database is publicly available? All First year data was published 2001 Latest year data was published 2014 How frequently is data updated annually 3,436 Hospital Service Areas (HSAs) sample size/number of transactions HSAs represent local health care markets for community-based inpatient care. Geographic coverage HSA http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/methods/research_method More details s.pdf

3 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Who is the database intended for? HCAHPS What part of the database is publicly all available? First year data was published 2007 Latest year data was published 2015 How frequently is data updated annually sample size/number of transactions Geographic coverage More details CMS (the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) CMS CMS Patient satisfaction survey The HCAHPS survey is administered to a random sample of adult patients discharged from the hospital the survey includes patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid, commercial insurance, and others. It includes many hospital discharges of patients who do not require advanced care or suffer from chronic diseases such as mothers who just delivered a baby, burn victims, influenza patients and many other conditions that require hospitalization. A substantial portion of the advanced illness population is excluded from HCAHPS: Patients who die in the hospital Patients discharged to hospice care Patients discharged to nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities Proxy responses are not permitted for this survey the patient must be able to answer for themselves Patients comparing Hospitals In March 2008, 2,421 hospitals publicly reported HCAHPS scores based on 1.1 million completed surveys; in April 2015, 4,167 hospitals publicly reported HCAHPS scores based on more than 3.1 million completed surveys. On average, more than 8,400 patients complete the HCAHPS every day. Hospital http://www.hcahpsonline.org/files/hcahps_fact_sheet_june_2015.pdf

4 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Who is the database intended for? What part of the database is publicly available? HRS University of Michigan University of Michigan National Institute on Aging and the Social Security Administration In-depth survey interviews Longitudinal Older Adults, over age 50 Researchers First year data was published 1992 Latest year data was published 2016 How frequently is data updated bi-annually all sample size/number of transactions Geographic coverage More details sample size varies per question - from 30 responses to 1300 responses National https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/responserates_2017.pdf

5 Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? National Healthcare Quality Report Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Healthcare Quality Report What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Who is the database intended for? What part of the database is publicly available? s Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older Researchers First year data was published Varies per measure; between 2005-2010 Latest year data was published Varies per measure; between 2013-2016 How frequently is data updated annually sample size/number of transactions Geographic coverage More details all The Medicare enrollment database served as the sampling frame. A Round 1 sample size of 8,500 respondents was targeted. State https://www.nhats.org/scripts/sampling/nhats_round_5_sample_design.pdf

6 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Who is the database intended for? What part of the database is publicly available? NHATS First year data was published 2011 Latest year data was published 2015 How frequently is data updated The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, with data collection by Westat sponsored by the Division of Behavioral and Social Research (BSR), a division of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Annual, in-person interviews Longitudinal Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older Researchers data is publicly available for analysis; data is available in SAS and STATA formats; Claims-linked data is only available to a small number of approved academic and research institutions (Johns Hopkins, RTI, Brown) annually sample size/number of transactions Geographic coverage More details Sample Size: 8000, Medicare claims-linked about 5,500; However, only 200+ decedent's caregivers are interviewed within a last month of life interview focuses on quality of end of life care annually. National https://www.nhats.org/scripts/sampling/nhats_round_5_sample_design.pdf

7 America s Care of Serious Illness: 2015 State-by- State Report Card on Access to Palliative Care in Our Nation s Hospitals Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Who is the database intended for? What part of the database is publicly available? First year data was published 2008 Latest year data was published 2015 America s Care of Serious Illness: 2015 State-by-State Report Card on Access to Palliative Care in Our Nation s Hospitals Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) Collaboration between the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) and the National Palliative Care Research Center (NPCRC) Cambia Health Foundation American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual of Hospitals Database, supplemented with data from the National Palliative Care Registry All hospitals identified by AHA as having palliative care programs Researchers All is available; however, analyses were limited to nongovernmental, general medical and surgical, cancer and heart hospitals within the fifty states. How frequently is data updated 2008, 2011, 2015 Where analyses are limited to hospitals with fifty or more beds, the final sample included a total of 2,393 hospitals. Of these, 2,330 completed the AHA survey; this number includes 840 hospitals that participated in the sample size/number of transactions National Palliative Care Registry. An additional 63 hospitals that participated in the Registry but had not submitted data to AHA, were also included. Geographic coverage Census Region More details https://reportcard.capc.org/frequently-asked-questions/

8 Name of database Who owns the database? Who publishes the database? Who funds the database? Underlying Cause of Death Mortality Statistics Branch, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS) Underlying Cause of Death, CDC What type of data is used? What patient population is reflected in the database? Data are based on death certificates for U.S. residents All Americans Who is the database intended for? Researchers What part of the database is publicly available? all First year data was published 1999 Latest year data was published 2015 How frequently is data updated sample size/number of transactions Geographic coverage More details annually All Americans County https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/ucd.html#

Candidate Measures for the ACT Index

Candidate Care Measures for the ACT Index Goal: All people with advanced illness have their physical, emotional or spiritual symptoms assessed and addressed in relation to their goals and values.

HOSPITAL DAYS PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE 11 Down Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.5% Acute Care 20 15 10 5 0 Hospital Service Area Care Transactional Hospital readmissions Hospital admissions Positive all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

12 INTENSIVE CARE DAYS PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE Down Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.0% Acute Care Hospital Service Area Care Transactional ICU days Neutral 5 4 3 2 1 0 all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

POTENTIALLY AVOIDABLE HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR CHRONIC CONDITIONS, EXCLUDING COPD, PER 100,000 POPULATION, AGE 18 AND OVER 13 Down AHRQ Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.3% Acute Care State Care Hospital readmissions Hospital admissions Positive 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

14 PERCENT OF HOSPITAL PATIENTS IN MEDICAL COHORT READMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF DISCHARGE Down Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate -1.5% Acute Care Hospital Service Area Care Transactional Hospital readmissions Hospital admissions Positive 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

15 PERCENT OF DEATHS OCCURRING AT HOME (NHATS) NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.1% Deaths at Home National Care Negative 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

16 PERCENT OF DEATHS OCCURRING AT HOME (CDC) CDC Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.9% Deaths at Home County Care Transactional Positive 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Data are based on death certificates for U.S. residents

17 HOSPICE DAYS PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST SIX MONTHS OF LIFE Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 5.9% Hospice Hospital Service Area Care Transactional Hospice LOS Positive 25 20 15 10 5 0 all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

18 PERCENT ENROLLED IN HOSPICE DURING THE LAST SIX MONTHS OF LIFE Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 4.8% Hospice Hospital Service Area Care Transactional Hospice LOS Hospice LOS Positive 60% 40% 20% 0% all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO RECEIVED HOSPICE CARE 19 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate 4.9% Hospice National Care Hospice LOS Positive 60% 40% 20% 0% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

20 PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO RECEIVED THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF HELP IN DEALING WITH ANXIETY OR SADNESS NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.6% Anxiety or Sadness Control National Care Symptom Control Negative 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

HOSPICE PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF HELP FOR FEELINGS OF ANXIETY OR SADNESS 21 AHRQ Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.1% Anxiety or Sadness Control State Care Symptom Control Positive 95% 90% 85% 80% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

22 PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO RECEIVED THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF HELP IN DEALING WITH PAIN NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -0.8% Pain Control National Care Symptom control Negative 100% 50% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

23 PERCENT OF ALL PATIENTS DURING HOSPITAL STAY WHOSE PAIN WAS ALWAYS WELL CONTROLLED HCAHPS Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.6% Pain Control Hospital Care Pain control within 48 hours Symptom control Positive 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Random sample of adult patients discharged from the hospital; on average, more than 8,400 patients complete the HCAHPS every day.

24 PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO RECEIVED THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF HELP IN DEALING WITH BREATHING NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.4% Other Symptom Control 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% National Care Symptom control Positive Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS WHO OVERALL WOULD RATE THE DECEDENT'S CARE IN THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE AS EXCELLENT 25 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -3.2% Patient Experience: End-of-Life National Care Negative 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

PERCENT OF ALL PATIENTS WHO RATED THE HOSPITAL AS A 9 OR 10 ON A 10-POINT SCALE 26 HCAHPS Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.5% Patient Experience: Acute Care Hospital Care Rating of Provider Rating of Provider Positive 80% 70% 60% 50% Random sample of adult patients discharged from the hospital; on average, more than 8,400 patients complete the HCAHPS every day.

PERCENT OF ALL PATIENTS WHO WOULD DEFINITELY RECOMMEND THE HOSPITAL TO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY 27 HCAHPS Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.7% Patient Experience: Acute Care 80% 70% 60% 50% Hospital Care Likelihood to Recommend Likelihood to Recommend Positive Random sample of adult patients discharged from the hospital; on average, more than 8,400 patients complete the HCAHPS every day.

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO WERE ALWAYS TREATED WITH RESPECT BY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS WHO WERE TAKING CARE OF THEM 28 NHATS Patient Experience: End-of-Life Compound Annual Growth Rate -0.1% National Care Treated with Respect 100% 90% 80% 70% Treated with Respect Negative Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHOSE PERSONAL CARE NEEDS WERE ALWAYS TAKEN CARE OF AS WELL AS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN 29 Patient Experience: Advanced Illness NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -1.2% National Care Negative 90% 70% 50% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

BETWEEN THE LAST INTERVIEW AND THE TIME OF THE DECEDENT'S DEATH, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO DID THEIR FAVORITE ACTIVITY 30 NHATS Patient Experience: Advanced Illness Compound Annual Growth Rate -0.4% National Care Negative 100% 90% 80% 70% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS FOR WHOM IT WAS ALWAYS CLEAR WHICH DOCTOR WAS IN CHARGE OF THEIR CARE 31 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -0.2% EOL Decisions 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% National Care Communication Communication Negative Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS FOR WHOM DECISIONS WERE MADE ABOUT THEIR CARE OR TREATMENT THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE WANTED 32 Down NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.4% EOL Decisions National Care Negative 15% 10% 5% 0% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS FOR WHOM DECISIONS HAD TO BE MADE ABOUT THEIR CARE AND TREATMENT OF DURING THE FINAL DAYS OF THEIR LIFE 33 HRS Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.3% EOL Decisions Region Care Advanced care plan/surrogate Advanced care planning Positive 60% 40% 20% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

Candidate Communications Measures for the ACT Index Goal: People with advanced illness have care plans consonant with their goals and values and are honored.

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO PROVIDED WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS ABOUT THE TREATMENT OR CARE THEY WANTED TO RECEIVE DURING THE FINAL DAYS OF THEIR LIFE 35 HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.0% Region Communications Advanced care planning Advanced care plan/surrogate Positive 60% 40% 20% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO DISCUSSED WITH CAREGIVER THE TREATMENT OR CARE THEY WANTED TO RECEIVE IN THE FINAL DAYS OF THEIR LIFE 36 HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.7% Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Advanced care planning Positive 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Older Adults, over age 50

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO MADE LEGAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR A SPECIFIC PERSON OR PERSONS TO MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR CARE OR MEDICAL TREATMENT IF THEY COULD NOT MAKE THOSE DECISIONS THEMSELVES. THIS IS SOMETIMES CALLED A DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE. Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.5% HRS 37 Advanced Directives or Equivalents Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Treatment consistent with preferences Positive 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO WERE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR MEDICAL CARE DURING THE FINAL DAYS OF THEIR LIFE 38 HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.3% Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Advanced care planning 60% 40% 20% 0% Positive Older Adults, over age 50

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS FOR WHOM A DOCTOR(S) RECOMMENDED ANY CARE OR TREATMENT THAT THE FAMILY OR OTHER DECISION-MAKER(S) ULTIMATELY REFUSED Down 39 HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.8% Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Treatment consistent with preferences Positive 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

40 PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO RECEIVED CARE OR TREATMENT THAT THE FAMILY OR OTHER DECISION- MAKER(S) HAD ULTIMATELY REFUSED Down HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate 4.6% Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Treatment consistent with preferences 30% 20% 10% 0% Negative Older Adults, over age 50

41 HOSPICE PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED CARE CONSISTENT WITH THEIR STATED END-OF-LIFE WISHES AHRQ Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.1% State Communication Treatment consistent with preferences 100% 50% 0% Positive Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

PERCENT OF DECEDENTS FOR WHOM THE PHYSICIAN OR ANY OTHER HEALTH CARE WORKER HAD PROBLEMS FOLLOWING THE WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS Down 42 HRS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.2% Region Communications Advanced care plan/surrogate Treatment consistent with preferences Positive 60% 40% 20% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO HAD A DECISION MADE ABOUT THEIR CARE OR TREATMENT WITHOUT ENOUGH INPUT FROM DECEDENT OR FAMILY Down 43 NHATS Advanced Directives or Equivalents Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.2% National Communications CAHPS-Provider listened carefully to patient Treatment consistent with preferences Positive 10% 5% 0% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHOSE DOCTORS, NURSES, OR OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONAL TALKED WITH THEM ABOUT THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS 44 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -2.2% Spiritual National Communications Negative 60% 40% 20% 0% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO HAD AS MUCH CONTACT OF THIS KIND (RELIGIOUS BELIEF) AS THEY WANTED 45 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -0.6% Spiritual National Communications Negative 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

Candidate Caregiving Measures for the ACT Index Goal: Family or other loved ones, as designated by the person with advanced illness, are recognized and included within the unit of care and as key members of the care team. All dimensions of their experience are assessed and addressed, as desired.

47 FAMILY CAREGIVERS WHO DID NOT WANT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT TO EXPECT WHILE THE PATIENT WAS DYING AHRQ Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.1% Caregiving State Caregiving Positive 86% 84% 82% 80% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

DURING THE LAST MONTH OF LIFE, PERCENT OF CAREGIVERS WHO WERE ALWAYS KEPT INFORMED ABOUT THE DECEDENT'S CONDITION 48 NHATS Compound Annual Growth Rate -1.4% Caregiving National Caregiving Communications Negative 90% 80% 70% 60% Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

49 HOSPICE PATIENT CAREGIVERS WHO PERCEIVED PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO HOSPICE AT THE RIGHT TIME AHRQ Compound Annual Growth Rate 0.3% Caregiving 95% 90% 85% 80% State Caregiving Positive Nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+

Candidate Community Measures for the ACT Index Goal: All people with advanced illness have their social determinants of health assessed and addressed consistent with the person s goals and values.

51 PERCENT OF DECEDENTS WHO USED COMMUNITY SERVICES HRS Compound Annual Growth Rate 7.2% Community Region Community Positive 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Older Adults, over age 50

HOME HEALTH AGENCY VISITS PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE 52 Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.2% Community Hospital Service Area Community Transactional Positive 30 20 10 0 all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

53 PERCENT OF HOSPITALS WITH A PALLIATIVE CARE PROGRAM CAPC Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.4% Community Census Region Community Transactional Positive 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% All hospitals identified by AHA as having palliative care programs

Candidate Cost Measures for the ACT Index Goal: People with advanced illness and their family will receive the most cost-effective care in alignment with their goals and values.

55 AVERAGE CO-PAYMENTS PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE Down Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.3% Cost Hospital Service Area Cost Transactional Negative $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99

56 MEAN OUT-OF-POCKET FOR MAJOR MEDICAL COSTS DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE Down HRS Compound Annual Growth Rate 1.9% Cost Region Cost Negative $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Older Adults, over age 50

TOTAL MEDICARE SPENDING PER DECEDENT DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS OF LIFE 57 Down Dartmouth Atlas Compound Annual Growth Rate 3.6% Cost Hospital Service Area Cost Transactional Negative $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 all Medicare beneficiaries who died between the ages of 66 and 99