State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties

Similar documents
Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet

Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance. Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP. Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

PREPARATION GUIDE. for. North Carolina State COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT. for the Year 2018

Texas Association of County Auditors

May CGHSFOA Accounting Conference Cheyenne Mountain Resort Colorado Springs May 15, Neal Christensen, CPA, CGMA Neal

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

Post Uniform Grant Guidance implementation from an auditor perspective

Schedule of Expenditure

To the Board of Overseers of Harvard College:

Section IV. Findings

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 400

APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010

Changes to the SFA Audit as a Result of the OMB Uniform Grant Guidance and Compliance Supplement

Single Audit Reporting Package

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO

2 CFR Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards For Auditees

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Federal Grant Guidance Compliance

Presenter. Changes to Federal Programs & Single Audits (A-87, A-21, A-122, A-102, A-110, A-89, A-133 & A-50) The New OMB Uniform Guidance

APPENDIX N FEDERAL AUDIT CLAUSES

Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

30. GRANTS AND FUNDING ASSISTANCE POLICY

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2013

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland. REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS

Financial Grants Management. Session Outline. Grants Management Roles 4/19/10

December 26, 2014 NEW ADDITIONAL December 26, 2014 beginning December 26, /31/15, 6/30/16 Contents Reference Origin Appendix

Circular A-133 Audits for Non-Profits Receiving Grants Preparing for Audits and Protecting Grant Eligibility Given Current Government Priorities

Engagements under Government Auditing Standards

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards

Uniform Guidance - Lessons Learned And To Be Learned

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2015

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

STATE AID TO AIRPORTS PROGRAM NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AVIATION

Government Auditing Standards Report

2010 Mauldin & Jenkins Single Audits for for Auditees

FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012

Implementing the OMB s Super Circular (aka UGG) Presented by: Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg, Florida

Single Audit Report. State of North Carolina. For the Year Ended June 30, Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT)

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

Uniform Guidance Procurement Requirements for NC Local Governments UNC School of Government Webinar Presentation April 24, 2018

Welcome! OVERVIEW. Uniform Guidance Procurement Requirements for NC Local Governments UNC School of Government Webinar Presentation April 24, 2018

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

Subrecipient Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Northeastern University Issued Subawards

Understanding and Complying with Government Grants

Subrecipient Profile Questionnaire

OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN

Something for Everyone: Adjusting to the OMB s Super Circular May 25, :30 10:10 am 2 CPE

SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION

Subject: Financial Management Policy for Workforce Investment Act Funds

UNDERSTANDING PHA OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE NEW UNIFORM RULE ON ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES AND AUDITS: WHAT S NEW AND WHAT S NOT

PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA. Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 49 U.S.C.

South Carolina State University

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation

WHAT LAWS APPLY TO FEDERAL GRANTS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

HENDERSHOT, BURKHARDT & ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Indirect Cost Information, Guidance, and Maximum Indirect Costs Worksheet

DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER. Please note: This information revises some of the data included in Memorandum #1128

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE

Uniform Guidance Subpart D Administrative Requirements. Why This Session Is Needed. Lesson Overview & Module Objectives

EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION RAILROAD STATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. N. C. Department of Transportation Rail Division

Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2009

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC

EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANTS PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

RACE TO THE TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE

CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

CAPITALIZATION GRANT FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

2012 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement

Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Fiscal Health Series. Systems to Sustainability TM. Federal Grants

How to Draft New & Update Old Policies and Procedures. Agenda. Why?

BLOCK GRANTS FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (MHBG) State Project/Program: COMMUNITY BASED PROGRAMS / MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

University of Pittsburgh SPONSORED PROJECT FINANCIAL GUIDELINE Subject: SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

The Uniform Guidance and Procurement TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AUDITORS


STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

EPA s Implementation of OMB Uniform Grants Guidance FEDERAL DEMONSTRATION PARTNERSHIP JANUARY 12, 2015

University Enterprises, Inc. Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES BLOCK GRANTS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE

Transcription:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE DIVISION AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION JANET COWELL TREASURER GREGORY C. GASKINS DEPUTY TREASURER Memorandum #2016-11 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties Sharon Edmundson, Director, Fiscal Management Section DATE: In December 2013, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Uniform Administration Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Final Rule, (Uniform Guidance) 1 that establishes uniform cost principles and audit requirements for federal awards to nonfederal entities and administrative requirements for all federal grants and cooperative agreements. Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance addresses the audit requirements. Among the changes, thresholds for federal single audits will increase from $500,000 to $750,000. The Type A/B major program determination has increased from a minimum of $300,000 to $750,000. For auditees not considered low risk, the percentage of coverage rule requirement has been reduced from 50% to 40%. Auditees that are determined to be low-risk may have 20% of federal expenditures audited, a decrease from the current requirement of 25%. The effective date of Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance is for years ending on or after December 15, 2015, which is June 30, 2016 for most local governments and public authorities in North Carolina. 2 We have included in this memo a discussion to changes to federal single audit changes resulting from Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance. Changes to the State Single Audit requirements Whenever OMB changes their single audit requirements, we, under the authority of G.S. 159-34, assess the current State Single Audit requirements and make any appropriate changes. State single audit requirements will be adapted to reflect changes resulting from the Uniform Guidance. The effective date for changes to the State Single Audit Implementation Act is for years ending on or after June 30, 2016. 1 The Uniform Guidance supersedes and consolidates the OMB Circulars on cost principles (A-21, A-87, A-122), administrative requirements (A-89, A-102, A-122), and audit requirements (A-50, A-133). The Uniform Guidance is part of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title I, Chapter I & II, Part 200 and appeared in the Federal Register Vo. 78, No. 248, December 26, 2013. Uniform Guidance has six Subparts and was effective December 26, 2013. It applies to federal audits of fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2014. 2 Units of governments in North Carolina that have years ending December 31 and March 31 include Public Housing Authorities, Hospitals, and one Airport Authority. The changes to the State Single Audit Implementation Act will not affect these entities, so it was decided to implement changes to the State requirements at June 30, 2016 after Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance was implemented. 3200 ATLANTIC AVENUE, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604 Courier #56-20-45 Telephone: (919) 814-4300 Fax: (919) 855-5812 Website: www.nctreasurer.com

Page 2 The following summarizes the changes to the State Single Audit Implementation Act. No change to the current State Single Audit threshold of $500,000. Change the threshold to determine a major program to $500,000 from the current threshold of $300,000. Reduce the percentage of coverage of State awards to 40% from the current percentage of 50%. As it is currently, there will be no low-risk auditee determination for State awards. Sections of the Uniform Guidance that will apply to the State Single Audit Implementation Act are as follows: Section Subpart A Definitions, as applicable 200.502 Basis for determining awards expended 200.330 Sub-recipient and contractor determination 200.503 (a, b, c) Relation to other audit requirements 200.505 Sanctions 200.508 Auditee responsibilities 200.509 Auditor selection 200.510 Financial statements 200.511 Audit findings follow-up 200.331 Requirements for pass-through entities 200.521 (a, c, d, e) Management decision 200.514 Scope of the audit 200.515 Audit reporting 200.516 Audit findings 200.517 Audit documentation 200.519 Criteria for program risk A discussion of each of the sections referred to above can be found in Discussion of Single Audit in North Carolina 3 which is part of the Audit Manual for Governmental Auditors in North Carolina. Sections of the Uniform Guidance that do not apply to State awards are also discussed, such as audit costs ( 200.506) and major program determination ( 200.518). Changes to the Federal Single Audit Requirements As mentioned before, the audit requirements for federal Single Audits are effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2015. Some of the more significant changes include: Audit requirements: The threshold for a federal Single Audit has increased to $750,000 of federal awards expenditures per year. The previous threshold was $500,000. Type A programs threshold: The thresholds for Type A and Type B programs were revised. The minimum threshold has increased to $750,000 from $300,000. This threshold applies to 3 As of the date of this memorandum, Discussion of Single Audit in North Carolina is being updated and should be available March 1, 2016.

Page 3 entities with total annual federal award expenditures of $750,000 to $25 million. After $25 million, the threshold increases according to the following: When total federal award expenditures Type A/B threshold will be are $750,000 $25 million $750,000 $25 million $100 million.03 times total federal awards expended $100 million $1 billion $3 million $1 billion $10 billion.003 times total federal awards expended $10 billion $20 billion $30 million Greater than $20 billion.0015 times total federal awards expended Large loan programs: When a federal program providing loans exceeds four times the largest non-loan program, it is considered a large loan program and the auditor must 1) consider this federal program as a Type A program; and 2) exclude its values in determining other Type A programs. This recalculation of Type A programs is performed after removing the total of all large loan programs. Cluster of programs: A cluster of programs is treated as one program in determining Type A programs. If there is a large loan program that comprises less than 50% of a cluster, a cluster is not considered to be a loan program. Type A programs low-risk requirements: There were changes to the requirements for determining whether a Type A program is to be considered low-risk. Currently, a Type A program may be considered low-risk if it had a significant deficiency in internal controls and/or a material noncompliance finding. In order to be low-risk under Uniform Guidance, the program: Must have been audited as major in one of the most recent two years Must not have had any of the following in the most recent audit period: o Modified opinion (new requirement) o Material weakness in internal control o Known or likely questioned costs that exceed 5% of total expenditures of the program (new) Audit of high risk Type B program requirements: The Type B program requirements have changed. The maximum number of high-risk Type B programs that the auditor is required to test is one-fourth the number of low-risk Type A programs. The auditor is only required to perform risk assessment on Type B programs that exceed 25% of the Type A threshold. There is no longer an Option 1 or 2. For entities that expend $25M or less, risk assessment is not required on programs with less than $187,500 of expenditures. This should result in less testing of high-risk Type B programs. Percentage of coverage rule requirements: The percentage of coverage rule requirement for auditees not considered low-risk has been reduced from the current 50% to 40%. Auditees that are

Page 4 determined to be low-risk may audit 20% of federal expenditures, a decrease from 25% under previous guidance. Criteria for low-risk auditee status: The criteria for low-risk auditee status have changed; there are two new requirements and two of the remaining requirements have been modified. To be a low-risk auditee, the entity must meet the following conditions for each of the two preceding audit periods: Timely completion of Single Audits and submission of the Data Collection form to the Federal Single Audit Clearinghouse. This does not apply to the submission to the Local Government Commission. Per the auditor s opinion, the financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP or a basis of accounting required by state law (new requirement) Unmodified opinion on financial statements and on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the cognizant agency or pass-through agency can no longer provide a waiver) No deficiencies in internal control identified as material weaknesses under the requirements of GAGAS. The auditor did not report a substantial doubt about the auditee s ability to continue as a going concern. (new requirement) No Type A programs had: o material weaknesses o modified opinion on compliance (this modified the previous requirement of no material noncompliance finding) o questioned costs greater than five percent of federal awards expended Questioned costs threshold: The threshold for reporting questioned costs has increased to $25,000 from $10,000 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (SEFSA): The total federal awards expended for loan and loan guarantees are required to be reported on the face of the schedule. This is in addition to the requirement that that the amount of loan outstanding be included as a note to the schedule. For a cluster of programs, the total amount expended for the cluster should be presented. Summary of Prior Audit Findings: If a prior year finding was not fully corrected, a description for the reason for the reoccurrence is required. Other notable changes: Federal agencies (or other agencies) do not have the authority to grant extensions of the due date for submitting reports.

Page 5 The terms must and should are included. The term must is used in the Uniform Guidance denotes a requirement. Should is used to indicate a recommendation, but not a requirement. The terms must and should differ from those in the auditing standards. The term contractor has replaced the term vendor. A sub-recipient may either be a contractor or a sub-recipient. The non-federal entity may concurrently receive federal awards as a recipient, a sub-recipient, and as a contractor. There are changes to the Single Audit reporting package requirements: Unless restricted by Federal statutes or regulations, the auditee must make copies available for public inspection. Auditees and auditors must ensure that their respective parts of the reporting package do not include protected personally identifiable information. If you have questions about these changes, please contact Jim Burke at (919) 814-4301 or via email at james.burke@nctreasurer.com or Manasa Cooper at (919) 814-4296 or via email at manasa.cooper@nctreasurer.com.