DATA QUALITY AND DATA USES. Agenda. Chicago, Illinois. Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Similar documents
Program Highlights. A User s RQRS Experience Mildred Nunez Jones, BA, CTR Northside Hospital Cancer Institute

Presentation Objectives

Objectives. Cancer Registry Abstracting

EHR Enablement for Data Capture

How can oncology practices deliver better care? It starts with staying connected.

Health Care Data Sets & Information Support Services at the UMHS

10/28/2011. Important Accreditation Facts: New Program Categories, Accreditation Awards, Commendations and the OAA

AHIMA/NCRA Cancer Registry Management Program PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENT

Best Practices to Improve Your Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting. March 20, 2013

Describe the process for implementing an OP CDI program

Achieving HIMSS Level 7 Implications for HIM. Children s Health System of Texas

5/12/2011. Important Accreditation Facts: New Program Categories, Accreditation Awards, Commendations and the OAA

Northwestern University Department of Urology

Using Data to Yield High Impact Business Intelligence Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Healthcare Solutions Nuance Clintegrity Quality Management Solutions. Quality. The Discipline to Win.

POPULATION HEALTH PLAYBOOK. Mark Wendling, MD Executive Director LVPHO/Valley Preferred 1

Pioneers in Quality Proven Practices: Keys to ecqm Success Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) s Journey

PSI-15 Lafayette General Health 2017 Nicholas E. Davies Enterprise Award of Excellence

CAC: Understanding the Technology and Lessons Learned from Early Adopters and The Next Big Thing : Core Measures and Quality Reporting

A Multi-Phased Approach to Using Clinical Data to Drive Evidence-Based EMR Redesign. Kulik, Carole Marie; Foad, Wendy; Brown, Gretchen

Domain 1 Patient Engagement

Accountable Care Atlas

TRENDS IN CANCER PROGRAMS

Electronic Physician Documentation: Increased Satisfaction

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY MCVH

Not the Same Old EOD: the New and Improved SEER EOD for 2018 and Beyond

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

Outpatient Hospital Facilities

Review Date: 6/22/17. Page 1 of 5

2/20/2013. Statewide, Population-Based, Incidence. Dr. Youjie Huang DOH State Director of Cancer Registry Operations

Initial Assessment, Survivorship Care Plans

Catherine Porto, MPA, RHIA, CHP Executive Director HIM. Madelyn Horn Noble 3M HIM Data Analyst

Recognizing that there were both issues with and opportunities

Reconciling Abstracted to Electronic Quality Measures

Chief Development Officer Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children s Hospital of Chicago

Surgical Performance Tracking in a Multisource Data Environment

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

1. General description

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2

Primer on Quality Improvement and Integrating MOC into my Practice. Erik Stratman, MD

Registry General FAQs

ASTS HRSA JCAHO NATO American Society of Transplantation. Disclosure. UNOS/CMS Regulations

10/20/2016. Working within the Value-Based World

EMPI Patient Matching Solution Product Use Cases: Epic Electronic Health Record Integration

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

Administrators. Medical Directors. 61% The negative impact on our hospital-based program s. 44% We will need to consider the most appropriate or most

CMS Oncology Care Model s Standards for Patient Navigation

Academic Clinical Practice Work Group Strategic Plan DRAFT June 3, 2014

AHRQ Quality Indicators. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

Chapter 11. Expanding Roles and Functions of the Health Information Management and Health Informatics Professional

uncovering key data points to improve OR profitability

Regional Director of Health Information Management (HIM) Operations. Trinity Health Loyola University Health System Maywood, Illinois

2. What is the main similarity between quality assurance and quality improvement?

Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting Program

National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme EVIDENCE GUIDE FOR: Colorectal MDT. Version 1

INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR OXFORD COVERAGE REIMBURSEMENT PART I OXFORD HEALTH PLANS OXFORD HEALTH PLANS (NJ), INC.

A New Clinical Operating Model Transforms Care Delivery and Improves Performance

Prior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:

Click to edit Master title. style. Click to edit Master title. style. style 8/3/ Are You on Track?

HIMSS Submission Leveraging HIT, Improving Quality & Safety

Using Facets of Midas+ Hospital Case Management to Support Transitions of Care. Barbara Craig, Midas+ SaaS Advisor

Visualizing the Patient Experience Using an Agile Framework

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM

A Qualitative Study of Master Patient Index (MPI) Record Challenges from Health Information Management Professionals Perspectives

KNOW Strategic Objectives

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

Quality of Electronic Pathology (E-path) Records: A Function of Time, X Factors and One Constant

Survivorship Care: Building a Program

HIGHMARK RADIATION THERAPY AUTHORIZATION PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

UMC Southwest Cancer Center

Creating an Effective Physician Governance Within a Health System. Donn Sorensen, M.B.A., FACMPE President Mercy East Region

INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME

Understanding the Implications of Total Cost of Care in the Maryland Market

Documentation, Coding and Reimbursement for Medical Oncology in 2018

ALLIED PHYSICIAN IPA ADVANTAGE HEALTH NETWORK IPA ARROYO VISTA MEDICAL IPA GREATER ORANGE MEDICAL GROUP IPA GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PHYSICIANS IPA

Measure #138: Melanoma: Coordination of Care National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

Karl Bilimoria MD MS Director, ISQIC. Faculty Scholar, American College of Surgeons

Menu Item: Population Management

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Population and Sampling Specifications

Director of Medical Staff Services South Shore Hospital

TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICINE

Patient Navigation & Satisfaction

Healthcare Financial Management Association October 13 th, 2016 Introduction to Accountable Care Organizations and Clinically Integrated Networks

STANDARD / ELEMENT EXPLANATION SCORING PROCEDURE SCORE

Operator Training in HDR Brachytherapy: Preventing Treatment Errors. Disclosure

Optum Anesthesia. Completely integrated anesthesia information management system

TOWN HALL CALL 2017 LEAPFROG HOSPITAL SURVEY. May 10, 2017

Defining Roles within the Cancer Registry

Identify obstacles, and understand the aspects of the revenue cycle that you should be focusing on at your organization

Rapid-Learning Healthcare Systems

Northern Ireland Peer Review of Cancer MDTs. EVIDENCE GUIDE FOR LUNG MDTs

Oncology Home Care: A Strategy for Growth & Improved Clinical Performance. Our Story. What s So Special About Specialty Care?

3M Health Information Systems. A case study in coding compliance: Achieving accuracy and consistency

Jumpstarting population health management

Nursing Peer Review SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 HYATT REGENCY CHICAGO CHICAGO, IL. Register by July 24 and SAVE $100!

improvement program to Electronic Health variety of reasons, experts suggest that up to

Using Data for Proactive Patient Population Management

Overview. Overview 01:55 PM 09/06/2017

Transcription:

DATA QUALITY AND DATA USES May 8, 2008 By Sue Kessler Manager, Transcription and Registries Northwestern Memorial Hospital Agenda Northwestern Memorial Hospital Hospital Quality Plan and Objective Tumor Registry Statistics Manager Job Description and Responsibilities Data Quality and Uses Summary Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago, Illinois Second oldest hospital in Chicago (1865) Only acute care hospital in Chicago s central area Chicago s most preferred hospital (National Research Corporation) for 11 years Primary teaching affiliate of Northwestern s Feinberg School of Medicine Average of 17% operating cash flow margin for last 20 years AA+ bond rating by Standard and Poor s and Aa/AA category rating for more than 25 consecutive years Approximately $1 billion in revenue Feinberg and Galter Pavilions New Prentice Women s Hospital

NMH Statistics Located downtown Chicago IL, between the Lake Superior and Michigan Ave Accreditations National Cancer Institute designated The Joint Commission Founding member of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Listed in Hospitals & Health Networks magazine s list of America s 100 Most Wired hospitals and health systems for state-of-the-art technology supporting patient care Successfully completed rare 4-way domino paired kidney exchange transplant surgery FY07 NMH Statistics 897 Patient beds Feinberg Pavilion Prentice Women s Hospital Stone Institute of Psychiatry 43,855 Inpatients admissions 477,065 Hospital outpatient registrations 35,000 Routine mammogram screenings performed yearly at Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center 12,137 Inpatient surgical cases 18,758 Outpatient surgical cases 76,701 Emergency department visits 1,545 Medical staff 37 Medical Oncologists 7 Radiation Oncologists 6,962 Organization wide employees A Typical Day At NMH 119 Inpatient Admissions 1,203 Outpatient Registrations 202 Emergency Department Visits 83 Surgeries (60% Outpatient) 27 Deliveries 1,600 Concurrent Active Electronic Health Record Users 90,000 New Orders Processed Online 225 Philanthropic Interactions

NMH Mission and Strategy Mission: Northwestern Memorial is an academic medical center where the patient comes first Strategy: To Provide the Best Patient Experience (BPE) from the Patient s Perspective To Recruit, Develop and Retain the Best People who Share the Organization s Values and Achieve Results To Develop the Resources to Achieve Our Mission and Vision through Exceptional Financial Performance As a Result, NMH Has Been Recognized for Quality and Excellence Most Preferred Hospital for 12 Years Leapfrog Group s Top Hospitals List UHC Top 10 for Quality and Accountability 2005 National Quality Health Care Award Achieved Magnet Status, 2006 Named to 100 Best Companies for Working Women for 7 Years 8 Specialties in U.S. News & World Report of Best Hospitals Achieving Best Patient Experience Determining Improvement Priorities Use of Data to Understand and Improve Quality and Patient Safety Comprehensive Claims Data Review Adverse Event Database DASHBOARD PRIORITIES Literature

Achieving Best Patient Experience Determining Improvement Priorities Prioritize the Drivers to be Addressed National Efforts/Literature (IHI Save 100K Lives, Leapfrog, JCAHO, CMS) Consensus Meetings with Clinical and Operational Leadership Implement Improvements to Measurably Improve Quality and Patient Safety Use of Process Improvement Methodology (DMAIC) Leverage Information Technology Ideal System Collect and enter data once as part of normal work flow Rely on structured data vs. free text Use same data format i.e. dates/time and same numerators and denominators-population and definitions are the same Timing requirements allow for use of standard databases not customized or double work Physician concerns are same as Hospital s and CMS or requesting Agencies so buy in is not a problem Ideal System Data available in Medical Record is captured and available for automatic extract Eliminate mapping and use standard system with built in logic No variability in where and how data is stored in Medical Record Data collected for internal purposes can be used for external reporting

How to Decide Which Measures Determine the Best Patient Experience Dashboard Criteria Measures Used on the Hospital Dashboard Measures that assist with accountability and support key initiatives Measures that are externally transparent and have not shown sustained performance Measures Used on the Hospital Dashboard Measures that have been approved by the Professional Standards Committee and have not shown sustained performance and which remain relevant Each measure selected must have a key quality committee also responsible for oversight

Electronic Medical Record Advantages Data readily available for all caregivers to view Most data in one system No more paper system registry Disadvantages Only as good as a physician or house staff document Cut and paste feature readily available and used often Private physicians charts are not in the EMR Tumor Registry Statistics NMH Registry began in 1976 Reference date is 1992 Largest registry in the state of Illinois Accessioned 3823 for 2006 92% follow up rate Follow approximately 10,688 analytic patients per year

Statistics (cont) Submit data monthly to the IL State Cancer Registry and yearly to the National Cancer Data Base Received a 3 year Award with Commendation from the American College of Surgeons (ACoS) Commission on Cancer in 2006, next survey 2010 20% increase in the number of analytic cases seen from 2002-2006 Electronic Registry System software Staffing 4 full-time abstractors Accession, abstract and conduct follow up activities for required malignancies diagnosed and/or treated at the abstracting facility. All credentialed, 2 RHIT, 1 CTR, 1 RHIA, CTR 1 health information clerk Reviews all pathology reports, disease and operation, cytology, and radiation oncology rosters for reportable cases. Conducts follow up activities to track patients outcomes. 1 manager Manage the staff, attend to the high level requests and activities Facilitate the Quarterly Committee on Cancer meeting which comprises of 25 physicians, clinicians and administrative staff. Facilitate the Executive Cancer Committee, a subcommittee of the Committee on Cancer. Instrumental in providing the data for the Cancer Program Annual Report and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer survey. Data Collection Review surgical pathology, radiation oncology rosters, cytology rosters, dermatology pathology reports, bone marrow reports for eligibility, treatment, and follow up Abstract pertinent information from the patients medical record, EPIC, outside pathology reports and communication with outside registries Maintain follow up on patients until they expire or 100 years old

Data Strengths Abstractors trained to collect the same data Ability to utilize many systems to collect pertinent data Support of the Committee on Cancer State of IL and National Cancer Data Base require specific edits to ensure data is clean Data Weaknesses Can only enter what the physician has documented Medical Oncology not always performed as an inpatient Patient not always good historian Database has set fields to complete, can only add a small percentage of additional fields Patients move without leaving a forwarding address Committee on Cancer Purpose is to set goals, plan, initiate, implement, evaluate and improve all cancer related activities at NMH. Governed by the American College of Surgeons (ACoS) Commission on Cancer Multidisciplinary committee, includes physicians, clinicians and administrative staff, with a designated chairman. Meet quarterly, first Monday of February, May, August, and November

Executive Cancer Quality Committee Subcommittee of the Committee on Cancer Meets monthly Discuss data quality, patient care satisfaction, treatment discrepancies Completes a monthly dashboard for reporting Key quality committee responsible for oversight of registry data Day to day work Quality Plan Monthly peer review Software edits for NCDB and State of IL submissions CP3R and E-quip edits in system, run on selected populations monthly to ensure we are collecting all pertinent data for submissions and data requests Physicians staging to ensure compliance ACoS required 10% monthly review Tumor Registry Manager Reports Manager of: Tumor Registry Medical Transcription Master Patient Index Departments All interact with each other

Tumor Registry Manager Reports Medical Transcription Contact physicians to complete delinquent procedure dictations, outstanding signatures, and tumor staging forms Interact with physicians and house staff on a weekly/monthly basis Create in EMR tumor staging forms Tumor Registry Manager Reports Master Patient Index Responsible to ensure data integrity in the medical record number assignment process Verify correct patient information and linkage with encounters Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Facilitate the Committee on Cancer Coordinate the planning of the agenda and speakers Contact speakers Present the dashboards and administrative report

Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Executive Quality Cancer Committee Dashboard Run reports to review data, treatment Recommend physician education for documentation Investigate options for obtaining pertinent information Notify private practices of importance of information and make arrangements to review their charts either online or paper Data Comparison Dimensions of Practice Measure Goal Baseline Timeframe Baseline FY07 Q1 FY07 Q2 FY07 Q3 FY07Q4 Surgical Volume Pancreas 30 8 6 8 10 Esophagus 20 9 5 6 4 Gastric 22 11 10 7 8 Rectal 65 15 22 19 14 Data Comparison (cont) Dimensions of Practice Measures Goal Baseline Timeframe Baseline FY07 Q1 FY07 Q2 FY07 Q3 FY07 Q4 Documentati on % of case compliant with clinical staging 99.9% 99.9% 99.3% 99.4% 98.9% % of physician s complaint with overall staging 100% 100% 99.8% 99.5% 99.9%

Data Comparison (cont) Dimensions of Practice Measures Goal Baseline Timeframe Baseline FY07 Q1 FY07 Q2 FY07 Q3 FY07 Q4 Process Measures Breast Cancer BRT 97% 95% 96% 93% 97% MAC 95% 100% 99% 98% 100% HT 96% 87% 86% 89% 90% Data Comparison (cont) Dimensions of Practice Measures Goal Baseline Timeframe Baseline FY07 Q1 FY07 Q2 FY07 Q3 FY07 Q4 Colorectal Cancers 12RLN 82% 85% 80% 76% 88% RECRT 100% 95% 99% 97% 96% Adjuvant Chemo 95% 67% 92% 88% 91% Survival Comparison

Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities (cont) Software Vendor Interact for high level discrepancies Create enhancements to the software to streamline the work flow (discuss Mainframe Merge) Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities (cont) Staffing Mentor lead abstractor to handle the day to day operations Communicate with staff regulatory changes and hospital wide quality measures Create and institute quality assurance measures, CP3R and Equip Monitor edit error rates Assure staff has required tools to complete their jobs Staff education to ensure familiar with treatment Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Initiatives Create concurrent abstracting procedure issues: How to systemically track incomplete abstracts Continually relooking up patients to add information, etc What to do with backlog, how do we catch up When do we abstract, immediately, 1 month from date of 1 st contact

Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Initiatives Create Quality position Handle the quality of data Create reports for requests, Assure data is concise and complete Identify documentation discrepancies Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Instrumental in creating an Enterprise Data Warehouse Lead for importing Tumor Registry data Patient s information will be in one location Complete data pulls Tumor Registry Manager Responsibilities Instrumental in creating an Enterprise Data Warehouse Data users can contact one individual/area to obtain information Disadvantages Duplicate information Conflicting information Garbage in, Garbage out

Class of Case Analytic Cases diagnosed at the accessioning facility and/or administered any of the first course of treatment there after the registry s reference date. Analytic cases class 1-2 are included in the treatment and survival analysis. Nonanalytic Cases accessioned at the accessioning facility for recurrent or progression of disease. All first course of treatment done elsewhere. Nonanalytic cases (class of case 3-9) are not usually included in the routine treatment or survival statistics. The Commission on Cancer does not require registries in approved programs to accession, abstract, or follow these cases. Data Uses Data Information Request Log Purpose: Data from the tumor registry is used for special studies to assist medical and administrative staff in managing patients and services effectively. A data request/usage log is maintained for these requests.

Reasons for a Request Comparison with national and state registries Treatment AJCC staging Incidence by site Clinical Trials Follow up Updating databases Types of Data Requested Race and ethnicity Number of specific site (exp lung) in a specific timeframe Histology Class of Case Status of last contact, expired or alive AJCC TNM staging Examples of a Data Request Incidence of race and sex for all analytic 2006 cases Histology for FY2006 breast cancer patients for a grant Breakdown of all cancer patients for FY2006 for the Cancer Program Annual report

Examples of a Data Request Class of case and AJCC staging for all breast patients FY2001-2003 for trending Follow up for database updating, provided list of their patients Incidence by class of case for all endometrial cancer patients FY1992-2004 for a clinical trial NCDB Benchmark Elements 5 year survival by AJCC stage Breast and colon cancer by first course of treatment Prostate cancer stage by race by age Age, gender, race, stage, histology, first treatment, surgical procedure NCDB Benchmark Elements Geographical area: all States, ACS division, State Hospital Type: Community Care Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Teaching/Research, Other Diagnosis years 1998-2004

Data Uses Completion of committee dashboard Reflects NCDB CP3R and E-quip measures Survival analysis and comparison Staging compliance Surgical volume IRB Approval All requests that provide patient identifiers, exp name, mrn, ssn Any request for patient information other than your own patients or list of your patients Summary

Websites American College of Surgeons http://www.facs.org/cancer/index.html National Cancer Data Base http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/index.html SEER http://seer.cancer.gov/ Northwestern Memorial Hospital http://www.nmh.org Questions? Contact Sue Kessler Health Information Management, Manager, Transcription and Registries Office: 541 N Fairbanks, Suite 1475 Chicago IL 60611 Phone: 312-926-0379 Email: skessler@nmh.org Thank You!