DRGs & MS-DRGs. System that takes into consideration the role that a hospitals case mix plays in influencing costs

Similar documents
Case-mix Analysis Across Patient Populations and Boundaries: A Refined Classification System

Disclosure of Proprietary Interest

CASE-MIX ANALYSIS ACROSS PATIENT POPULATIONS AND BOUNDARIES: A REFINED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR INTERNATIONAL USE

Public Dissemination of Provider Performance Comparisons

Carondelet Health Network APR DRG Information for Physicians September 2014

Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) are a type of

USE OF APR-DRG IN 15 ITALIAN HOSPITALS Luca Lorenzoni APR-DRG Project Co-ordinator

Hospital Payments and Quality Initiatives

THE IMPACT OF MS-DRGs ON THE ACUTE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER. Dynamics and reform of the Diagnostic Related Grouping (DRG) System

3M Health Information Systems. 3M Clinical Risk Groups: Measuring risk, managing care

Overview of Final Rule for FY 2011 Revisions to the Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Clinical Documentation: Beyond The Financials Cheryll A. Rogers, RHIA, CDIP, CCDS, CCS Senior Inpatient Consultant 3M HIS Consulting Services

DC Inpatient APR-DRG Payment for Acute Care Hospitals

Attending Physician Statement- Major organ / Bone marrow transplantation

UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT AND CARE COORDINATION Section 8

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

A preliminary analysis of differences in coded data from Australia and Maryland

Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) Programs: What Role Should Compliance Play?

Developing ABF in mental health services: time is running out!

Successes in Nutrition Support: Malnutrition Initiative

3M Health Information Systems. The standard for yesterday, today and tomorrow: 3M All Patient Refined DRGs

Definitions/Glossary of Terms

Essentials for Clinical Documentation Integrity 2017

INCENTIVE OFDRG S? MARTTI VIRTANEN NORDIC CASEMIX CONFERENCE

The Nexus of Quality and Finance

Complex Decision-Making Around the Use of Extreme Technologies at the Edges of Medicine in the Pediatric ICU: The Case of Extracorporeal Life Support

Reimbursement Policy. Subject: Inpatient Readmissions Committee Approval Obtained: Effective Date: 10/01/13

Health Economics Program

This is the Full Title of a Session

General Background of CDI

RE: Two-Midnight Policy and Potential Short Stay Payment Solutions

Goodbye PPS: Hello RCS!

What is CDI? 2016 HTH FL Boot Camp. HIM/Documentation: Endurance in the Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) Race

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

Appendix H. Alternative Patient Classification Systems 1

Appendix #4. 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) for Classification of Chronically Ill Children and Adults

WHA Risk-Adjusted All Cause Readmission Measure Specification Rev. Oct 2017

How Allina Saved $13 Million By Optimizing Length of Stay

The Shift is ON! Goodbye PPS, Hello RCS

Value of the CDI Program Cindy Dennis, MHS, RHIT

Value of the CDI Program Cindy Dennis, MHS, RHIT

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized Title 63. Public Health and Safety

INPATIENT HOSPITAL REIMBURSEMENT

Outpatient Hospital Facilities

Advance Directive for Health Care pursuant to 63 O.S

How BC s Health System Matrix Project Met the Challenges of Health Data

UW MEDICINE ICD-10 Program UW MEDICINE ICD-10

2018 Biliary Reimbursement Coding Fact Sheet

Benefit Criteria for Outpatient Observation Services to Change for Texas Medicaid

Hospital Clinical Documentation Improvement

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Demonstrating the Chain of Medical Necessity. Presented by Evan M. Gwilliam, DC MBA BS CPC CCPC QCC CPC-I MCS-P CPMA CMHP AAPC Fellow Vice President

Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)

HCT Coding & Documentation

MQii Malnutrition Knowledge and Awareness Test

Carolinas Collaborative Data Dictionary

ICD-CM Coding The Structural Considerations

OHIO MEDICAID. OHA APR-DRG Rebase & EAPG Implementation Overview Sept.14, 2017

Fiscal Year 2014 Final Rule: Updates for LTCHs

Medicaid Hospital Rate Advisory Group

THE PEPPER AND YOUR CDI PROGRAM. Kat McFarland, RN, MN, ACM Director Care Management Providence Regional Medical Center Everett 9/28/2018

Kaiser Permanente (No. and So. California) 2018 Union

Using APR DRGs to Verify Medicaid Payment and Improve Hospital Care: Let s Talk Methodology and Strategy

FY2018 Proposed Rule: Payment and Quality Reporting

Presented by: Jodie Edmonds VP Medicaid Revenue Consultant Passport Health Communications

3M Health Information Systems. A case study in coding compliance: Achieving accuracy and consistency

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

Medicaid Policy Changes and its Detrimental Effects on Neonatal Reimbursement and Care

PSYCHIATRY SERVICES: MD FOCUSED

Health Assessment Survey

INPATIENT/COMPREHENSIVE REHAB AUDIT DICTIONARY

So How Do You Convince Your Hospital Leadership Your Idea is Best for Patient Care? Mission, Quality, Cost, and Standardization

Coding Analysis Related to Commercialization of the XPANSION Skin Grafting Instruments Provided by The Institute for Quality Resource Management

Optima Health Provider Manual

Evaluation and Management

State of Ohio Living Will Declaration with Donor Registry Enrollment Form and State of Ohio Health Care Power of Attorney

CMS QUALITY MEASURES, COULD MEAN TO YOU MALNUTRITION, AND WHAT IT. Part I of Nutrition Division Webinar Series

Advance Health Care Planning

Social Security Scheme on Health Care for Person Defined by the Provisions of the Labour Law. Date June, 16, 2016 Heng Sophannarith

Course Module Objectives

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007

Does Health IT Adoption Lead to Better Information or Worse Incentives?

Part I. New York State Laws and Regulations PRENATAL CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (i.e., implementing regs on newborn testing program)

The Medicare Prospective Payntent Systent

THE ART OF DIAGNOSTIC CODING PART 1

Advance Directive. What Are Advance Medical Directives? Deciding What You Want. Recording Your Wishes

Criteria for granting privileges:

ICD-10 Implementation: No Margin, No Mission

ICU Research Using Administrative Databases: What It s Good For, How to Use It

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Purpose

Evaluation and Management Auditing Back to the Basics. Objectives. Audit Start with the benchmarks CMS MEDPAR by specialty 4/22/2013

Clinical Costing Clinical Costing processes and business application in the hospital setting Health Finance Fundamentals Program 2018

Inpatient Hospital Services

A Primer on Activity-Based Funding

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

Payment Policy: High Complexity Medical Decision-Making Reference Number: CC.PP.051 Product Types: ALL

MEDICARE CCLF ANALYTICS: MEDICARE ANALYTICS DATA ENGINE (MADE)

Reimbursement for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Hospital Inpatient, Emergency Department and Other Outpatient Settings 1

The World of Evaluation and Management Services and Supporting Documentation

Case Mix - Putting HIMs in the Mix. HealthAchieve November 3, 2014 Greg Zinck Manager, Case Mix Canadian Institute for Health Information

Transcription:

DRGs & MS-DRGs What are DRGs? System that takes into consideration the role that a hospitals case mix plays in influencing costs Relates the type of patients a hospital treats (case mix) to the costs incurred Groups like-patients with like-resource consumption and LOS patterns together Shows the clinical complexity and consumption of hospital resources DRGs were the first system to allow the measurement of a hospital s case mix (CM) complexity Direct measure of the resource consumption and therefore the cost of providing care A hospital with a complex CM means that the hospital patients are consuming more resources and therefore the cost of care is higher A complex case mix in DRG terms does not imply that the hospital treats patients having a greater severity of illness, higher risk of mortality, greater treatment difficulty, poorer prognosis, or greater need for intervention In order to be practical and meaningful, the DRG system needed to meet the following (4) criteria: Patient characteristics used in the definition of DRGs should be limited to information routinely collected in hospital abstract systems Patients are grouped into DRGs based on Principal diagnosis Co morbidity Complication Principal procedure Secondary procedure Age

Sex Discharge status Each DRG should contain patients with a similar pattern of resource intensity Each DRG group has a set payment rate that is based on historical charge and payment data Costs are reimbursed (80% of costs) Each DRG should contain patients who are similar from a clinical perspective DRG assignment is primarily based on diagnosis and/or procedure performed Fully packaged system Example: DRG 127 Heart Failure and Shock One DRG is assigned per encounter/admission Costs for all services are included in the payment for the one DRG Pharmaceutical Supplies Nursing Facility accepts profit or loss Drives facilities to practice cost management Patient health information (PHI) data needed to group DRGs One principal diagnosis (dx) and up to 8 additional dx One principal procedure (px) and up to 5 additional px Age Sex Discharge status

DRG Components Group number MDC Assignment Major diagnostic category 25 Medical/surgical status Medical/surgical/pre-MDC Title LOS GMLOS AMLOS Relative weight Measure of resource intensity for a particular type of encounter Code range that drives DRG assignment Steps in Assigning a DRG: Pre-MDC assignment Nine DRGs for which the MDC of the principal diagnosis is not taken into consideration for DRG assignment. The cases are directly assigned based upon procedure codes only Heart transplant 103 Liver transplant 480 Bone marrow transplant 481 Tracheostomy (face mouth neck) 482 Lung transplant 495 Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant 512 Pancreas transplant 513 Tracheostomy (except face mouth neck) with major procedure 541

Tracheostomy (except face mouth neck) without major procedure 542 MDC Determination What is the MDC of the principal diagnosis (dx) Principal diagnosis Definition: established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care The MDC of the principal diagnosis used for assignment Medical/Surgical status determination Was an operating room (OR) procedure performed? Yes: surgical status No: medical status Refinement Various questions are used to isolate the correct DRG assignment This process allows the DRG system to group together like patient from the clinical perspective with like resource consumption Is a complication or co morbidity (CC) present? Is the principal diagnosis complicated? Is a major complication or complex diagnosis present? Is the patient s age greater or less than 17 years of age? What is the patient s sex? What is the patient s discharge disposition (alive, expired, or against medical advice? What is the birth weight of the baby (for neonates)? Complication: A condition arising during the hospital stay that prolongs the LOS by at least one day in approximately 75% of the cases Co morbidity: A pre-existing condition which because of its presence with the principal diagnosis will increase the LOS by at least one day in 75% of the cases A major complication/co morbidity (MCC) is a category of CC that is of a higher severity.

MS-DRGs Basics: 1) Effective date 10/1/2007 2) 745 groups 3) Utilizes CC diagnoses and MCC diagnoses 4) Three tiered system Development: Three Steps Consolidation of existing DRGs into base DRGs Categorization of each diagnosis as a MCC, CC or non-cc Revision criteria: - Does this condition require intensive monitoring? - Does this condition result in the use of expensive and technically complex services? - Does this condition result in extensive care requiring a greater number of caregivers? Subdivision of each base DRG into subclasses based on CCs In order for a subgroup to be created all five criteria had to be met: 5) A reduction in variance of charges of at least 3 percent 6) At least 5 percent of the patient in the MS-DRG fall within the CC or MCC subgroup 7) At least 500 cases are in the CC or MCC subgroup 8) There is at least a 20 percent difference in average charges between subgroups 9) There is a $4,000 difference in average charge between subgroups